SEOCESSo IIT IFT T aaa Tees ees eed f =, ; ee oles Name: _Michser Meath Sections IST Ls _ daw: fag 30",2° DENSITIES OF ORGANIC LIQUIDS Laboratory Report Observations and Data (5 marks) ** Remember to carefully note the gradations and calibrations on the two pipettes so that you report your values with the appropriate number of significant figures. “ IMPORTANT: on an analog scale like a graduated pipette, the final significant figure ported is found by ESTIMATING the liquid level’s position in between the graduation marks bracketing the observed bottom of the meniscus (ie., between the slightly-too-high scale gradation and the slightly-too-low scale gradation). A zero at the end means it was exactly level with one of the scale’s finest increment marks, “OBSERVATIONS iene [ethyl acetate [ texane | acetone {unknown |Does it dissolve in water? [vo | Wo [NO [No | 1fnot, does it sink or float? [Foo | Foot | Fook | Float) [DATA OBTAINED USING VOLUMETRIC PIPETTE | mass of empty vial and cap (555. lu [AMS fea | | mass of vial, cap and liquid 17-004 [Uo yaglt2. 82.8 | 12-0657 g) | mass of liquid ¥ lot? [pws [0,413 | 0.445 | te.22« 4 & | volume of liquid delivered 9.50 | 0,50 | Se jogo [DATA OBTAINED USING GRADUATED PIPETTE | mass ofempty vial and cap 55S ‘ted lla HS {2 22 | mass of viel, eap and liquid [1867 {ia.te9 12.04 |12..69¢ 9 |massofliuid [23 forty [oth [0-474 {initial pipette reading AsSte3 lo 1n9 [? 148 | 4. [final pipette reading Cb Rhy, 0.565|0,649 [0.649 al | volume of liquid delivered — lost [o,a36 | 9, S01 | 0, Sos] CHEM 205 LAB: DENSITY = p.7Interpretations of Results & Conclusions 1. (2 marks) Calculate the densities of the four liquids you studied and complete the table below, giving values 10 the appropriate number of significant figures exis pois (eer eeellee= Density (g-mL") = mass (g) volume (mL) iduated pipette data average experimental density accepted value (from Table 1) 2. (2.5 marks) Calculate the average of your three relative (%) errors, Use this % error to determine your range of density values for your unknown liquid. Based on this range and the possibilities listed in Table 1, what is the likely identity of your unknown liquid? List more than one choice if your results are ambiguous, and comment on how accurate you feel your results are. W218 47.5 | 1S 4 OFL x0.075> 9.069 hay a eee 3 Coe he oe /o,851, 0.994 \ FF Gases on out (esuliy, te Untoorn Iquid is Cttte- Toluene (9-867) o¢ et] acefate (0.402) We (ee or ve lumefte, plbetle dota wos very accatde ig ove gioducred piPeHe dota Seems rtore PreciSeybur ley ace rote . 3. (1.5 marks) Suppose you were slow to cap the vials after measuring out the liquids, and some evaporated. What effect would this have on the densities you calculated? Would this cause poor accuracy, low precision, or both? Explain briefly. = Mis, Would cove the moss to be lor thon ‘i should be Cebiive to He Wendy (case volvne, — The cesullng density Volved would b@ lower theo expe de) lorer accuracy de the yolue bel Furtle, £60m Catsing the occeptes volve- ct giver The Some ri feclSlin world colop VQ Sapof © Gem 205 LAB: DENSITY —p.8 = } oo foom Consitlens ,Nelvms of Viquid ond $]1m® to put the Cop on. =VULVUVUVOVUV UV UV VwVeTT VN 4. (2 marks) To permit comparison of the precision of the two pipette types, obtain the ethyl acetate densities from three other pairs of students working near you in the lab. Complete the table below to obtain the average value of the density and its average deviation for the two different pipette types. (Remember, (1) you must calculate the average density before youcan calculate the deviations, and (2) average deviation is calculated using the absolute values of the individual deviations.) | ty from ar | Run | volumetric | Deviation | graduated | Deviation | Pipettedata | (volumetric) | pipette data | (graduated) -—-— - (ee satan | 0.40 ow [0872 [0,055 ms | cite : [2 Joa hoon [0.434 bo,o1m [3 Jot oo [0.875 Foor [4 [ago | oc [5,889 Foor hem ies| 0:9 Olid ey x [0.036 javeraes | 0.90 | 0,005) 0.917 Note: A better way to compare precision would be 10 make each student pair repeat the whole experiment several times. That would eliminate deviations caused by differences in technical skills, but we don't have time for that! ._ (2 marks) Consider the average deviations you just calculated for the two pipette types. Which pipette type yielded more precise results? Does this match your expectations based con how the two pipettes are calibrated (i,, ther level of significant figures) and how they are used? Explain briefly. — The volunttie plpetie ielies care precise fesults bard 2 of Sample o€ meosirements = This does ae Motch ovr expectat)os boseal on jhe (evel of Signet AGUS. TWS ig mo likely div fo fuinon ertor When U5iny the goduk eo pipure, and ver iifle error win Meosutlnn eva 0140 ml) (fom thy yolumebtic pipette . CHEM 205 LAB: DENSITY ~p.9re Flack. quia Aye ee 6, m» Chemca’s PF (ivi ond (Led cong! take} Dbo me dd] 12) cy (UmetlE AY Ey lay prose of viol MeasSulé empt+ V Chemihn's « Rece/é Ue dln Crabidel Pipette wl iow yeep oF How's) B mee plow | eee fe ae ould peg Oo