22/03/24, 11)42 AM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

.
W.P.(C) 195/2010
.
.
RAHUL MEHRA .....
Petitioner
Through: Mr. Prashant Bhushan with Mr. Mayank Misra and Mr. Rahul Mehra,
Advocates
.
.
versus
.
.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Mr. Devvrat, Advocates for UOI
Mr. Anil Grover, Advocate for R-2 and R-3
Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, Advocate for R-4
Mr. Neeraj Choudhary, Advocate for R-5
Mr. Surender Goel, Advocate for R-11
.
.
CORAM:
HON?BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON?BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
.
.
O R D E R
10.03.2010
.
In the first instance, the Union of India should file an affidavit
indicating the extent of control its exercises on each of the Respondent Sports
Federations and the amount given to them by way of funds and other W.P.(C)
195/2010 Page 1 of 2
.
facilities. The Union of India should also categorically state whether the
accounts of the Sports Federations are maintained and if so the latest audit
report should be filed along with a statement as to who has audited the accounts
of the Sports Federations. The audited accounts should be brought to court in a
sealed cover on the next date of hearing.
The affidavit be filed within four weeks.
We make it clear that we do not propose to extend the time for filing the
affidavit because a detailed affidavit has not been filed by the Union of India
since it appeared in the matter on 20th January, 2010 which is almost two months
ago.
List on 7th April, 2010.
.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
.
.
.
MUKTA GUPTA, J
MARCH 10, 2010
mm/vn
.
.
.
.
.
.
W.P.(C) 195/2010 Page 2
of 2
8#

https://dhcappl.nic.in/dhcorderportal/PrintTextOrder.do Page 1 of 1