You are on page 1of 47

Survey Data in Macroeconomics

II. Survey Datasets and Methodological Issues

Prof. Dr. Lena Dräger

Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, GSEFM field course


Email: ldraeger@uni-mainz.de

1 / 47
Outline

1 Survey Datasets

2 Qualitative vs. Quantitative Questions

3 Wording Issues

4 Truncation

2 / 47
Survey Datasets

Relevant Survey Datasets

3 / 47
Survey Datasets

Relevant Surveys

Professional forecasters: SPF US (Philadelphia Fed), SPF Eurozone (ECB),


Consensus Economics & Blue Chip

Households: University of Michigan Survey of Consumers (US), Survey of


Consumer Expectations (US), Joint Harmonised EU Programme of Business
and Consumer Surveys (most EU countries), British Household Panel, DNB
Household Survey (Netherlands), Household Finance and Consumption
Network (ECB)

Firms: ifo Business Survey (Germany), survey of New Zealand Firms


conducted by Coibion, Gorodnichenko & Kumar, Duke University Survey of
Chief Financial Officers (CFO), Industrial Trends Survey by the
Confederation of British Industry (UK), Survey on Inflation and Growth
Expectations (Banca d’Italia)

4 / 47
Survey Datasets

Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) in the US

https://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/
real-time-center/survey-of-professional-forecasters/

Forecasts by private sector economists in businesses, the financial


sector and university research centres

Conducted by the Philadelphia Fed

Quarterly data since 1968q4, data collected by the Philadelphia Fed


since 1990

Publicly available: Mean, median, cross-sectional dispersion and


microdata

5 / 47
Survey Datasets

Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) in the US

Sample size around 30, with a panel dimension (anonymous)

Includes only quantitative macroeconomic expectations (forecasts)

Probability distribution forecasts for annual inflation and GDP growth


and the probability of a recession

Forecasters give quarterly projections for 5 quarters and annual


projections for the current year (nowcast) and the next year ⇒ fixed
horizon and fixed event forecasts!

6 / 47
Survey Datasets

Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) in the US

Forecasted variables, US Business Indicators:


GDP (growth)
GDP chain-weighted price index
Corporate profits after tax
Civilian unemployment rate
Industrial production index (growth)
Housing starts
Three-month Treasury Bill rates (since 1981q3)
Moody’s AAA Corporate Bond Yield (from 1981q3-2016q4)
10-year Treasury Bond rate (since 1992q1)

7 / 47
Survey Datasets

Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) in the US

Forecasted variables, GDP and its components (all since 1981q3):


Real GDP
Real personal consumption expenditures
Real Nonresidential fixed investment
Real residential fixed investment
Real Federal government consumption expenditures & gross investment
Real state and local government consumption expenditures & gross
investment
Real change in private inventories
Real net exports of goods and services

8 / 47
Survey Datasets

Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) in the US

Forecasted variables, CPI and PCE inflation (all growth rates):


CPI inflation (since 1981q1)
Core CPI inflation (since 2007q1)
PCE inflation (since 2007q1)
Core PCE inflation (since 2007q1)
Long-term (10-year) forecasts (except CPI all since 1992q1 and
collected only in the first quarter each year):
CPI (since 1991q1)
Real GDP
Productivity growth
Stock return (S&P 500)
10-year Treasury Bond return
3-months Treasury Bill return

9 / 47
Survey Datasets

Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) at the ECB

https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/ecb_surveys/survey_of_
professional_forecasters/html/index.en.html

Professional forecasters at financial or non-financial institutions in the


European Union

Sample size around 90, with panel dimension (anonymous)

Quarterly, conducted by the ECB since 1999q1

Aggregate and microdata publicly available

Includes quantitative forecasts and quantitative probability distribution


forecasts and point forecasts for underlying assumptions
10 / 47
Survey Datasets

Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) at the ECB

All forecasts are for the Eurozone

Forecasted variables:
HICP inflation
Real GDP growth
Unemployment rate
Assumptions on the ECB’s main refinancing rate, oil prices, USD/EUR
exchange rate and labour cost changes

Forecast horizons (mostly fixed event):


Current calendar year
Next calendar year, and calendar year after that
4-5 calendar years ahead
“Rolling horizon” one-year ahead from latest available data publication

11 / 47
Survey Datasets

Consensus Economics

http://www.consensuseconomics.com/

Survey conducted by a private firm, collecting quantitative economic


forecasts from about 700 economists each month

Not publicly available

Forecasts by the same forecaster for several countries

Forecasting firms are identified

Only fixed event forecasts

12 / 47
Survey Datasets

Consensus Economics

Range of macroeconomic and financial forecasts (GDP growth,


unemployment, inflation, interest rates, exchange rates etc.)

Countries and Regions:


G-7 and Western Europe
Eastern Europe
Latin America
USA

Special surveys:
Foreign exchange markets forecasts
Commodity forecasts in energy and metal markets

13 / 47
Survey Datasets

Blue Chip Surveys

Blue Chip Economic Indicators and Blue Chip Financial Forecasts

Financial market and economic forecasts, survey conducted by a


private firm

Forecasts of yields along the yield curve

Forecasting firms are identified

Focus on US economy

Not publicly available

14 / 47
Survey Datasets

University of Michigan Survey of Consumers

https://data.sca.isr.umich.edu/

Large household survey in the US, microdata available since 1978m1

Sample representative of the US population, cross-section of about


500 households

Rotating panel dimension: Every month, about 40% of respondents


are (randomly) chosen to be re-interviewed after 6 months

Aggregate and microdata publicly available

15 / 47
Survey Datasets

University of Michigan Survey of Consumers

Includes quantitative macro expectations (point forecasts) on one-year


ahead and 5-10-years ahead inflation, gas price inflation, house price
inflation
Qualitative macro expectations and attitudes on changes in business
and buying conditions, unemployment, interest rates, inflation
Qualitative and quantitative micro expectations on changes in
personal and family income, financial household situation
Percent chances that certain events occur

Large range of socio-demographic characteristics


Further interesting questions: Index of consumer confidence, news on
business conditions observed, assessment of government’s economic
policy

16 / 47
Survey Datasets

Survey of Consumer Expectations

https://www.newyorkfed.org/microeconomics/sce

Conducted by the New York Fed since 2013m6

Sample representative of the US population, cross-section of about


1,300 households

Rotating panel dimension: Households stay in the panel for up to 12


months

Aggregate and microdata publicly available (with a lag)

17 / 47
Survey Datasets

Survey of Consumer Expectations


Large range of subjective macro and micro expectations:
Inflation, incl. home prices and prices of gas, food, rent, medical care,
education
Unemployment
Interest rates
Stock market and credit availability
Taxes and government debt
Own employment situation
Own income and spending

Includes both point forecasts and probability distribution forecasts and


percent chances of binary outcomes
Forecasts for various ranges (1 year and 3 years)
Additional modules on credit access, labour market and spending
(each quarterly), one special module and yearly modules on the
housing market, consumption and saving
18 / 47
Survey Datasets

Joint Harmonised EU Programme of Business and Consumer


Surveys

https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/
indicators-statistics/economic-databases/
business-and-consumer-surveys_en

Monthly since 1985m1 (not all countries and not all questions)

Representative household samples

Harmonized questionnaire in all EU countries

Aggregate and sub-group data publicly available, microdata depends

19 / 47
Survey Datasets

Joint Harmonised EU Programme of Business and Consumer


Surveys
Macro and micro perceptions (past 12 months) and expectations (next
12 months):
Changes in consumer prices
Major purchases of durable consumer goods
Change in savings
General economic situation
Own financial situation

Qualitative expectations of:


Unemployment
Purchase car or house
Home improvements
Consumer confidence indicator

Only qualitative expectations! Quantitative data fielded since 2003,


but not published. Exception: Swedish Consumer Tendency Survey20 / 47
Survey Datasets

DNB Household Survey (Netherlands)


https://www.centerdata.nl/en/projects-by-centerdata/
dnb-household-survey-dhs
Panel of 2000 Dutch households, yearly data from 1993-2015

Topics fielded include:


Economic aspects of financial behavior including subjective reasons for
investment decisions
Inflation expectations
Employment
Housing and mortgages
Health
Pensions
Income, assets and loans
Psychological characteristics
Personal characteristics

Data publicly available after registration


21 / 47
Survey Datasets

Household Finance and Consumption Network (ECB)

https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/economic-research/
research-networks/html/researcher_hfcn.en.html

Collection of household data on finances and consumption, with


detailed information on assets and liabilities

Large panels in each Euro area country

Waves approx. every 2 years, so far 2 waves in 2010-2011 and


2013-2015

Questionnaires are partly harmonized across countries

22 / 47
Survey Datasets

ifo Business Survey

Survey of German firms in trade and services

Monthly since 1991m1 (longest horizon)

Also interesting: ifo Investment Survey, bi-annually since 2007

Confidential data, only some time series publicly available

23 / 47
Survey Datasets

ifo Business Survey

Only partly publibly available, including information on questionnaires

Aggregate time series of qualitative indices available:


Business climate index Germany
Business climate German service industry
Business climate Eastern Germany
Credit constraint indicator
Employment barometer Germany
Export expectations

24 / 47
Survey Datasets

Survey on Inflation and Growth Expectations (Banca


d’Italia)
https:
//www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/indagine-inflazione/
index.html?com.dotmarketing.htmlpage.language=1

Quarterly since 1999

Panel of 1,000 firms with 50 or more workers in Italy

Firms from industry, non-financial private services and construction

Includes current perceptions and expectations of inflation 6, 12, and


24 months ahead

Data is publicly available


25 / 47
Survey Datasets

Survey on Inflation and Growth Expectations (Banca


d’Italia)

Qualitative and probabilistic expectations on:


General economic situation in Italy and in the firm’s sector
Own investment
Own employment
Own product prices
Own demand

Quantitative inflation expectations with/without anchoring (latest


data given)

26 / 47
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Questions

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Questions

27 / 47
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Questions

Survey Design

Question difficulty
Firms/households vs. professional forecasters
Media coverage
Central bank communication

Answer accuracy

Literacy and numeracy issues


Knowledge about the macroeconomy varies greatly
Non-response bias for inflation expectations greater for some
socio-economic groups (Blanchflower and Kelly, 2008)
Difficulties with working with percentages

28 / 47
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Questions

Illiteracy Measured by Non-Response Rates

Price Wording Inflation Wording


Perceptions Expectations Perceptions Expectations
All 0.06 0.08 0.12 0.09
Male 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.05
Female 0.10 0.10 0.19 0.13
16-29 0.03 0.07 0.16 0.12
30-44 0.04 0.07 0.11 0.07
45-59 0.05 0.04 0.10 0.11
60+ 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.07
Low Education 0.09 0.13 0.25 0.12
Medium Education 0.07 0.09 0.14 0.12
High Education 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03
0-25% Income 0.00 0.03 0.12 0.11
25-50% Income 0.10 0.08 0.12 0.07
50-75% Income 0.16 0.19 0.16 0.09
75-100% Income 0.00 0.03 0.04 0.04

Source: Dräger and Fritsche (2013).


29 / 47
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Questions

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Inflation Expectations

Figure: Qualitative and Quantitative Inflation Expectations in Sweden

20
4
3

0
−20
2

−40
1

−60
0

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

quantitative inflation expectations, trunc


qualitative inflation expectations, balance stat

Source: Swedish Consumer Tendency Survey.


30 / 47
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Questions

Aggregating Qualitative Questions – Balance Statistic

Qualitative survey variables are often summarized in the so-called balance


statistic:
b = s1 + 0.5s2 − 0.5s4 − s5 (1)
where s1 , s2 , s3 , s4 and s5 are the shares of answers in the categories prices
will “rise a lot”, “rise moderately”, “rise slightly”, “stay about the same”,
“fall”.

Balance statistic with three answer categories:

b = s1 − s3 (2)

31 / 47
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Questions

The Carlson-Parkin Probability Method

Method for quantifying aggregate qualitative survey expectations

For 3 answer categories by Carlson and Parkin (1975), adjusted for 5


categories by Batchelor and Orr (1988)

Quantification makes strong assumptions about distribution and


baseline information

Not more accurate than balance statistic (Maag, 2009)

Some variants are useful for quantifying qualitative disagreement


(Mokinski et al., 2015)

32 / 47
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Questions

The Carlson-Parkin Probability Method


Assumptions:
1 Expectations are formed according to a subjective probability
distribution
2 Individual distributions can be aggregated to a joint pdf f (xt+1 |Ωt )
(often assumed to be normal), which has finite first and second order
moments where E [xt+1 |Ωt ] =t µt+1 and t µt+1 is the expected value
of x at time t for period t + 1
3 There are symmetric intervals (−δ L , δ U ) and (−εL , εU ) around 0 and
around the subjective mean perceived inflation rate µ̃t such that
respondents answer that prices will:
fall if xt+1 ≤ −δ L ⇒ answer proportion t At+1
stay about the same if −δ L < xt+1 ≤ δ U ⇒ answer proportion t Bt+1
rise slightly if δ U < xt+1 ≤ µ̃t − εL ⇒ answer proportion t Ct+1
rise moderately if µ̃t − εL < xt+1 < µ̃t + εU ⇒ answer proportion t Dt+1
rise a lot if µ̃t + εU ≤ xt+1 ⇒ answer proportion t Et+1
33 / 47
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Questions

The Carlson-Parkin Probability Method

f(xt+1|Ωt)

tCt+1
tBt+1

tDt+1

tAt+1 tEt+1

L
-δt 0 δtU tµt+1 µ~ t-εt µt µ
L ~ ~
t+εt
U xt+1

Figure 1: Quantification of pentachotomous survey data

Source: Nielsen (2003). L


t −t
µ̃
U L 34 / 47
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Questions

The Carlson-Parkin Probability Method

Inverse distribution functions (quantile functions) are defined as follows:

F −1 (t At+1 ) =t at+1 (3)


−1
F (t At+1 +t Bt+1 ) =t bt+1 (4)
F −1 (t At+1 +t Bt+1 +t Ct+1 ) =t ct+1 (5)
−1
F (t At+1 +t Bt+1 +t Ct+1 +t Ct+1 ) =t dt+1 (6)
(7)

35 / 47
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Questions

The Carlson-Parkin Probability Method


Then, we get:

µ̃t (t at+1 +t bt+1 )


t µt+1 = (8)
t t+1 t bt+1 −t ct+1 −t
a + dt+1
−2µ̃t
t σt+1 = (9)
t t+1 t t+1 −t ct+1 −t
a + b dt+1
µ̃t (t at+1 −t bt+1 )
δt = (10)
t at+1 +t bt+1 −t ct+1 −t dt+1
µ̃t (t ct+1 −t dt+1 )
εt = (11)
t t+1 t bt+1 −t ct+1 −t
a + dt+1
(12)

where t µt+1 is the quantified aggregate expectation with standard


deviation t σt+1 . The quantification depends crucially on the assumed
distribution function and the value for µ̃t !
36 / 47
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Questions

Analyzing Microdata of Qualitative Expectations

In microdata, there is no immediate way of quantifying qualitative answers,


but we can use estimators that account for qualitative data:

Convert answers into dummy variables (for bivariate questions or if we


want to look at specific categories)
⇒ Probit/logit or bi-probit estimators

Use ordered probit/logit estimators


⇒ Make sure that answer categories are ordered in a meaningful way

37 / 47
Wording Issues

Wording Issues

38 / 47
Wording Issues

Wordings for Eliciting Inflation Expectations


When fielding macroeconomic expectations of non-experts, survey
wording can be important

NY Fed Project (see Bruine de Bruin et al., 2012) and Hamburg BUS
Survey (see Dräger and Fritsche, 2013):
Significant differences between perceptions and expectations given
when asked about “changes in prices in general” or the “inflation rate”

⇒ Perceptions and expectations are lower and less dispersed when asking
about “inflation”

⇒ Asking about “prices in general” seems to elicit (extreme) personal


price experiences (availability bias)

⇒ Media and central bank communication about “inflation”

⇒ What is the inflation rate that people act upon?


39 / 47
Wording Issues

Wordings for Eliciting Inflation Expectations

Figure: Distribution of Inflation Perceptions and Expectations Across Wordings

Quantitative Inflation Perceptions and Expectations


60

60
50

50
Frequency

Frequency
40

40
30

30
20

20
10

10
0

0
−5 0 5 10 15 20 25 −5 0 5 10 15 20 25
Perceived Inflation Rates, Truncated Perceived Increase in Prices in %, Truncated
60

60
50

50
Frequency

Frequency
40

40
30

30
20

20
10

10
0

−5 0 5 10 15 20 25 −5 0 5 10 15 20 25
Expected Inflation Rates, Truncated Expected Increase in Prices in %, Truncated

Source: Dräger and Fritsche (2013).


40 / 47
Wording Issues

Wordings for Eliciting Inflation Expectations

Table: Summary Statistics Quantitative Inflation Expectations Across Wordings

Mean Median SD IQR

All Price Question 4.73 3.00 4.80 3.00


Inflation Question 3.07 2.00 3.69 1.50

Male Price Question 4.47 3.00 4.57 3.00


Inflation Question 3.01 2.00 3.71 1.50
Female Price Question 4.99 3.00 5.00 3.00
Inflation Question 3.13 2.00 3.70 2.25

Low Education Price Question 6.00 5.00 6.22 5.00


Inflation Question 4.20 2.00 5.45 3.00
Medium Education Price Question 4.73 3.00 4.74 3.00
Inflation Question 3.39 2.00 3.97 1.20
High Education Price Question 4.19 3.00 4.14 3.00
Inflation Question 2.21 2.00 2.08 1.00

0-25% Income Price Question 5.83 3.25 6.64 3.50


Inflation Question 3.11 2.00 5.00 2.00
25-50% Income Price Question 5.38 3.00 5.57 3.00
Inflation Question 3.52 2.00 4.58 2.00
50-75% Income Price Question 4.49 3.00 3.03 3.00
Inflation Question 3.47 2.10 3.38 2.50
75-100% Income Price Question 3.74 3.00 3.10 3.00
Inflation Question 2.19 2.00 1.30 1.00

Source: Dräger and Fritsche (2013). 41 / 47


Truncation

Truncation

42 / 47
Truncation

Truncation of Quantitative Survey Expectations

Estimation results can be biased if the data contains extreme outliers

This also applies to survey data of (non-expert) macro expectations

⇒ Truncation of the data

The University of Michigan Survey of Consumers truncates answers at


(-50,50%) (!)

Researchers typically truncate by dropping the top/bottom 2.5% of the


distribution or by dropping expectations outside the range (-5,30%)

43 / 47
Truncation

Truncation of Quantitative Survey Expectations

Figure: Distribution of 1 Year Ahead Inflation Expectations of US Households


4.0e+04

4.0e+04
3.0e+04

3.0e+04
Frequency

Frequency
2.0e+04

2.0e+04
1.0e+04

1.0e+04
0

0
−50 −40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20 30 40 50 −5 0 5 10 15 20
Expected Inflation 1 Year Ahead, Not Truncated Expected Inflation 1 Year Ahead, Truncated

Source: Microdata from the University of Michigan Survey of Consumers; sample period: 1978m1-2012m9;
Observations 215,823 and 202,664.

44 / 47
Truncation

Literature I

Batchelor, R. A. and A. B. Orr (1988).


Inflation expectations revisited.
Economica 55 (219), 317–331.

Blanchflower, D. G. and R. Kelly (2008).


Macroeconomic Literacy, Numeracy and the Implications for Monetary
Policy.
Working Paper Bank of England .

Bruine de Bruin, W., W. van der Klaauw, G. Topa, J. S. Down, and


O. Armantier (2012).
The effect of question wording on consumers’ reported inflation expectations.

Journal of Economic Psychology 33 (4), 749–757.

45 / 47
Truncation

Literature II

Carlson, J. A. and M. Parkin (1975).


Inflation expectations.
Economica 42 (166), 123–138.

Dräger, L. and U. Fritsche (2013).


Don’t worry, be right! survey wording effects on inflation perceptions and
expectations.
Macroeconomics and Finance Series University of Hamburg 8/2013.

Maag, T. (2009).
On the accuracy of the probability method for quantifying beliefs about
inflation.
KOF Swiss Economic Institute Working Paper 230.

46 / 47
Truncation

Literature III

Mokinski, F., X. Sheng, and J. Yang (2015).


Measuring disagreement in qualitative expectations.
Journal of Forecasting 34 (5), 405–426.

Nielsen, H. (2003).
Inflation expectations in the eu – results from survey data.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Sonderforschungsbereich 373:
Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes 13.

47 / 47

You might also like