You are on page 1of 5

International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 115 (2024) 109276

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

International Journal of Surgery Case Reports


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijscr

Case report

Solitary bone plasmacytoma mimicking a lesion of odontogenic origin: A


case report
Zhiguo Liu a, b, Minyi Cui a, b, Siyi Zheng a, b, Hongyan Liu a, b, *
a
Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, Guangdong, China
b
Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center of Oral Disease, Guangzhou 510055, Guangdong, China

A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T

Keywords: Introduction and importance: Solitary bone plasmacytoma (SBP) is an early-stage plasma cell malignancy. It is an
Solitary bone plasmacytoma extremely rare condition and its diagnosis may not be straightforward. This report presents a case of maxillary
Periapical lesion SBP.
Maxillary
Case presentation: A 48-year old man sought care for persistent swelling and pain in the periapical region of the
Misdiagnosis
left maxillary molars. He had been diagnosed with “apical periodontitis” and root canal treatment of teeth #26
Case report
and #27 was ineffective. Extra-oral examination revealed swelling at the left maxilla. Intraoral examination
revealed a hard, non-fluctuant swollen region in the buccal alveolar mucosa adjacent to the apices of teeth
#25–27. Cone-beam computed tomography revealed extensive bone destruction in the left maxilla. The patient
underwent partial maxillary resection and radical maxillary sinusotomy. Further testing (positron emission CT
scan, histopathological and immunohistochemical examination) confirmed the diagnosis of SBP. The patient had
a recurrence two years later, which was managed with left subtotal maxillectomy and radiotherapy. There was
no evidence of recurrence during 20 months of follow-up.
Discussion: SBP may mimic an odontogenic lesion when found in the jaw bone. To confirm the diagnosis, routine
blood test, complete body skeletal survey, metastatic investigations and histopathology should be performed.
Radiotherapy is the primary treatment.
Conclusion: SBP may occur in the maxilla mimicking an odontogenic lesion. Surgery may be part of the diagnostic
procedure and an adjunct to definitive radiation. Radiotherapy is the primary treatment.

1. Introduction report presents a rare case of maxillary SBP mimicking a lesion of


odontogenic origin. The diagnosis and management of the case are
Plasma cell neoplasms are abnormal proliferations of monoclonal B- described as below.
cells that rarely occur in the jaw bones. These neoplasms have various
clinical presentations, including multiple myeloma (generally located in 2. Case presentation
the bone marrow) and solitary plasmacytoma (SP, characterized by a
single mass of clonal plasma cells, with minimal or no bone marrow This work has been reported in line with the SCARE Guidelines [7]
plasmacytosis or systemic involvement). SP can present as solitary bone and the PROCESS criteria [8].
plasmacytoma (SBP, limited to one site in the axial skeleton) or extra­ A 48-year-old man visited the Department of Operative Dentistry and
medullary plasmacytoma (EMP, usually limited to soft tissues) [1,2]. Endodontics in our hospital with persistent pain and swelling in the
Most SBP patients develop myeloma (median time to progression, 2–4 periapical region of the left upper molars for two months. He was
years) and the overall median survival ranges from 7.5 to 12 years [3]. diagnosed with “apical periodontitis” of teeth #26 and #27 at a pe­
SBP mostly affects red marrow-containing bones including the femurs, ripheral dental clinic and endodontic treatment was started. However,
pelvis, ribs, and vertebrae. It is rare in oralfacial region and only 4.4 % of the pain and swelling did not subside. The patient denied any further
SBP have been reported in mandible [4,5]. Maxillary SBP is an history of surgical treatment, sustained fever, systemic diseases, al­
extremely rare condition and its diagnosis may be difficult [6]. This lergies, or unintended weight loss. The patient had no significant past

* Corresponding author at: Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, Guangdong, China.
E-mail address: liuhyan@mail.sysu.edu.cn (H. Liu).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109276
Received 13 December 2023; Received in revised form 11 January 2024; Accepted 12 January 2024
Available online 22 January 2024
2210-2612/© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Z. Liu et al. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 115 (2024) 109276

invasion of the left maxillary sinus by the tumor. The CBCT images
showed no signs of root resorption (Fig. 2). Biochemistry analysis of the
blood and urine was unremarkable.
The patient was directed to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Department. Histopathological analysis of frozen biopsy samples
showed a round and sheet-like arrangement of tumor cells while a few
cells had large nuclei with atypia and rare mitosis, suggesting a possible
diagnosis of odontogenic tumors. Partial maxillary resection and radical
maxillary sinusotomy were performed. Pathological analysis showed a
diffuse pattern of plasmacytoid cells characterized by large, atypical,
and eccentric nuclei, dichromatic cytoplasm, and occasional mitosis in
bone tissues (Fig. 3A). Immunohistochemical examination confirmed a
population of cells positive for kappa (Fig. 3B) and negative for lambda
immunoglobulin light chain (Fig. 3C). The above findings were consis­
tent with plasmacytoma. A positron emission CT scan was performed
and proved no tumor cell infiltration to other tissues. Bone marrow bi­
opsy examination showed no abnormalities. Based on the clinical and
histologic findings, the patient was diagnosed with solitary bone plas­
macytoma. Radiotherapy was suggested, however, the patient refused.
Fig. 1. Periapical radiograph revealed incomplete endodontic treatment of Two years later, the patient was re-evaluated with tumor recurrence.
teeth #26 and #27 and presence of lower radiodensity area at the apices of CBCT showed the extraction of teeth #25–28 and defective alveolar
teeth #26 and #27. crests on these teeth and the inferior wall of the left maxillary sinus. The
alveolar bone of the first premolar was irregularly absorbed. A soft tissue
medical history. mass was observed in the left maxillary sinus. The lesions penetrated
Extraoral examination revealed the presence of a hard bony swelling into the left nasal cavity and the bone on the inner wall of the left
measuring 3.0 × 4.0 × 2.0 cm at the left maxillary region with a well- maxillary sinus was absorbed (Fig. 4). Left subtotal resection of the
defined tender boundary and obliteration of the buccal sulcus. No maxilla was performed. Pathological analysis showed findings similar to
numbness was observed in the left infraorbital region. There were no those in previous reports. The patient was referred to the Cancer Center
palpable lymph nodes, blockage of the left nasal cavity, or numbness. for radiotherapy to a dose of 50Gy in 25 fractions. During the 20-month
Intraoral examination revealed a hard swelling in the region of the follow-up period, the patient reported no discomfort or pain.
buccal alveolar mucosa associated with teeth #25–27. The access cav­
ities of teeth #26–27 were previously sealed with temporary cement and 3. Discussion
were negative to a cold and electrical pulp test. The periapical area of
teeth #26–27 was slightly sensitive to percussion and showed no SBP is an early-stage plasma cell-localized malignant lesion that may
mobility. The teeth #25 and #28 were responsive to cold stimuli mimic an odontogenic lesion when occurs in the jaw bone. In the present
without any tenderness. Periapical radiograph examination revealed study, the lesion was located around the apical area of the maxillary
incomplete endodontic treatment of teeth #26 and #27 and the pres­ molars, mimicking periapical radiolucency. Further workup including
ence of a lower radiodensity area at the apices of teeth #26 and #27 CBCT and histopathological testing was used to confirm the diagnosis
(Fig. 1). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) machine (DCT-pro, and for treatment planning. Non-odontogenic lesions in the dento-
VATECH, Korea), which demonstrated poorly defined destruction alveolar region are likely to be misdiagnosed as odontogenic origins.
(approximating 29.5 × 28.5 × 20.5 mm), with intra-tumoral thin and Sirotheau et al. evaluated 56 cases referred to oral pathology initially
straight septa at the apices of teeth #25–27 in the left maxilla. The misdiagnosed as periapical lesions. They found that 29 % (16/56) of
associated buccal and palatal cortexes were destroyed without root cases represented malignant lesions. The most common malignancies
resorption. Soft tissues emanating from the bone was observed and a included metastatic injuries (31.5 %) and carcinomas (25 %) and pre­
strip-like high density was seen in the soft tissue mass, suggesting sented with pain and swelling [9].

Fig. 2. Initial Cone Beam Computed Tomographic imaging revealed a poorly defined destruction at the apices of the teeth #25–27 in the left maxilla. The adjacent
buccal and palatal cortex was destructed. Soft tissue emanating from the bone was demonstrated, and a strip-like shadow with high density was also found in the soft
tissue mass. The tumor invaded to the left maxillary sinus (arrow). The CBCT showed no signs of root resorption (A) Coronal section, (B) sagittal section, (C)
axial section.

2
Z. Liu et al. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 115 (2024) 109276

Fig. 3. Histological examination of the bone tissue. (A) H&E-stained section shows a diffused pattern of plasmacytoid cells characterized by large, atypical and
eccentric nuclei, dichromatic cytoplasm and occasional mitosis in bone tissues (100×). Immnunohistochemical stain revealed a population of cells positive for kappa
(B) and negative for lambda immunoglobulin light chain (C) (100×).

There are very few retrospective studies reporting the occurrence of guidelines to diagnose SBP: normal bone marrow without evidence of
SBP in jaw bones. In the maxillofacial region, SBP is relatively common clonal plasma cells, a biopsy-proven bone solitary lesion with evidence
in the mandible, especially in bone marrow-rich areas including the of clonal plasma cells, magnetic resonance imaging, or CT of the spine
retromolar trigone, angle, and ramus [10]. Swelling and pain are the and pelvis showing normal skeletal characteristics (except for the pri­
primary clinical presentations of SBP in the jaw, occasionally with mary solitary lesion), and the absence of end-organ damage such as
mobility of the associated teeth and numbness of the lips [11]. The In­ hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, or bone lesions [12]. The
ternational Myeloma Working Group recommends the following findings from clinical examination in this case were consistent with the

3
Z. Liu et al. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 115 (2024) 109276

Fig. 4. Cone Beam Computed Tomographic imaging of two years after the first operation. The CBCT revealed the defective alveolar crest of these teeth and inferior
wall of the left maxillary sinus. The crest bone of alveolar of the teeth #24 was absorbed irregularly. Soft tissues were penetrated into the left nasal cavity, and bone
of the inner wall of the left maxillary sinus was resorbed (arrow). (A) Coronal section, (B) sagittal section, (C) axial section.

above criteria. Funding


SBP is easy to be misdiagnosed as odontogenic tumor. The radio­
graphic presentation was close to that of odontogenic myxoma in the The authors state that this study has received no financial support.
CBCT images: fine and straight septa separated the tumor into trian­
gular, square, or rectangular spaces, mimicking a “tennis racket” or Author contribution
“honeycomb” pattern [13]. Therefore, SBP should also be differentiated
from odontogenic myxoma radiographically. Zhiguo Liu: Investigation, Writing- original draft.
SBP itself is a radiosensitive lesion, so radiotherapy is always Minyi Cui: Investigation, Resources, Writing- original draft
considered the primary treatment [14,15]. Local control rates can be Siyi Zheng: Writing- original draft.
achieved in 80–90 % of cases with radiation therapy alone [16]. But Hongyan Liu: Investigation, Resources, Writing-review and editing,
Ghiassi-Nejad et al. reported that in the United States, only 66.5 % of Validation.
patients with solitary plasmacytoma received radiotherapy [17].
Sometimes, surgical intervention is indicated, especially in cases of
Guarantor
compromised neurological and structural instability [18]. In a system­
atic survey about solitary plasmacytoma of the jaws, nearly 58 % of
Hongyan Liu.
patients underwent surgical treatment, including only surgical treat­
ment or associated radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy [15]. In many
Research registration number
instances, patients have had surgery as part of the diagnostic procedure
and an adjunct to definitive radiation. In the present case, the patient
Not applicable.
underwent surgery without subsequence radiotherapy initially and
suffered a relapse of the SBP. Radiotherapy was performed for the
recurrent lesion. Conflict of interest statement

4. Conclusion The authors declare that they have no any financial and personal
relationships with other people or organisations that could inappropri­
In conclusion, SBP may occur in the maxillary bones mimicking an ately influence (bias) their work.
odontogenic lesion without specific clinical manifestations. Non-
endodontic lesions should be considered during differential diagnosis Data availability
of apical periodontitis. Microscopic analysis of biopsy samples should be
performed to rule out the possibility of malignancy when necessary. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are
Radiotherapy can be considered the primary treatment after definite available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
diagnosis.
References
Consent
[1] J. Caers, B. Paiva, E. Zamagni, X. Leleu, J. Bladé, S.Y. Kristinsson, et al., Diagnosis,
treatment, and response assessment in solitary plasmacytoma: updated
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publi­ recommendations from a European Expert Panel, J. Hematol. Oncol. 11 (1) (2018)
cation of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the 10, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-017-0549-1.
[2] P. Finsinger, S. Grammatico, M. Chisini, A. Piciocchi, R. Foà, M.T. Petrucci, Clinical
written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this
features and prognostic factors in solitary plasmacytoma, Br. J. Haematol. 172 (4)
journal on request. (2016) 554–560, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.13870.
[3] M.A. Dimopoulos, L.A. Moulopoulos, A. Maniatis, R. Alexanian, Solitary
Ethical approval plasmacytoma of bone and asymptomatic multiple myeloma, Blood 96 (6) (2000)
2037–2044.
[4] Z. El Zouiti, C. Amezian, F. Elayoubi, A.E. Tsen, Solitary plasmacytoma of
The protocols were approved by the University Ethic Committee at mandible: a case report, Radiol Case Rep 19 (1) (2024) 66–69, https://doi.org/
the Sun Yat-sen University, China (KQEC-2020-08). 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.09.061.
[5] H. Suryavanshi, S. Patankar, S. Dhumal, S. Choudhari, Solitary plasmacytoma of
jaw bone: a case report and systematic review of fifty cases from literature, J Oral
Maxillofac Pathol 25 (1) (2021) 205, https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_251_
20.

4
Z. Liu et al. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 115 (2024) 109276

[6] S. Anil, Solitary plasmacytoma of the maxilla—a case report and review of the multiple myeloma, Lancet Oncol. 15 (12) (2014) e538–e548, https://doi.org/
literature, Gen. Dent. 55 (1) (2007) 39–43. 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70442-5.
[7] C. Sohrabi, G. Mathew, N. Maria, A. Kerwan, T. Franchi, R.A. Agha, The SCARE [13] K. Wang, W. Guo, M. You, L. Liu, B. Tang, G. Zheng, Characteristic features of the
2023 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines, Int. odontogenic myxoma on cone beam computed tomography, Dentomaxillofac.
J. Surg. 109 (5) (2023) 1136–1140, https://doi.org/10.1097/ Radiol. 46 (2) (2017) 20160232, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160232.
JS9.0000000000000373. [14] S. Choudhari, S. Dhumal, M.J. Mantri, A. Gadbail, Solitary plasmacytoma of jaw
[8] R.A. Agha, M.R. Borrelli, R. Farwana, K. Koshy, A.J. Fowler, D.P. Orgill, The bone: a viewpoint on treatment modalities, Future Oncol. 17 (19) (2021)
PROCESS 2018 statement: updating consensus Preferred Reporting Of CasE Series 2409–2412, https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2021-0316.
in Surgery (PROCESS) guidelines, Int. J. Surg. 60 (2018) 279–282, https://doi.org/ [15] E.M. Lombardo, F. Maito, C. Heitz, Solitary plasmacytoma of the jaws:
10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.031. therapeutical considerations and prognosis based on a case reports systematic
[9] F. Sirotheau Corrêa Pontes, F. Paiva Fonseca, A. Souza de Jesus, A.C. Garcia Alves, survey, Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 84 (6) (2018) 790–798, https://doi.org/
L. Marques Araújo, L. Silva do Nascimento, H.A. Rebelo Pontes, Nonendodontic 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.05.002.
lesions misdiagnosed as apical periodontitis lesions: series of case reports and [16] A. Pham, A. Mahindra, Solitary plasmacytoma: a review of diagnosis and
review of literature, J. Endod. 40 (1) (2014) 16–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. management, Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 14 (2) (2019) 63–69, https://doi.org/
joen.2013.08.021. 10.1007/s11899-019-00499-8.
[10] M. Kamal, P. Kaur, R. Gupta, S. Gupta, S. Singh, Mandibular plasmacytoma of jaw - [17] Z. Ghiassi-Nejad, M. Ru, E. Moshier, S. Chang, S. Jagannath, K. Dharmarajan,
a case report, J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 8(8):Zd20-21 (2014), https://doi.org/10.7860/ Overall survival trends and clinical characteristics of plasmacytoma in the United
jcdr/2014/9565.4674. States: a national cancer database analysis, Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 19 (5)
[11] Y. Liu, K. Li, Solitary plasmacytoma of maxillofacial bones: correlation of CT (2019) 310–319.
features with pathological findings, Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 49 (1) (2020) [18] R. Soutar, H. Lucraft, G. Jackson, A. Reece, J. Bird, E. Low, D. Samson, Guidelines
20190277, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190277. on the diagnosis and management of solitary plasmacytoma of bone and solitary
[12] S.V. Rajkumar, M.A. Dimopoulos, A. Palumbo, J. Blade, G. Merlini, M.V. Mateos, et extramedullary plasmacytoma, Br. J. Haematol. 124 (6) (2004) 717–726, https://
al., International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.04834.x.

You might also like