Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The investment in industrial sector (with the surplus earned) will shift the MP curve
outward right as from aa to bb and then to cc. In this way agri. sector will be able to get rid
of labor until the MPL = real wages = AB = constant institutional wage (CIW) which is
obtained by dividing the total agri. output ORX (b part of Fig) by AD amount of labor. In
other words, the slope of ORX curve represents real wage rate. Thus the MPL = CIW where
the tangent to the total output line ORX at X is parallel to OX. In the second phase DK
amount of labor were employed. But still MPL < CIW or CIW > MPL. It means that in this
phase a certain amount of labor is still surplus or they are prey to disguised unemployment.
The first stage of FR model is very similar to Lewis. Disguised unemployment comes
into being because the supply of labor is perfectly elastic and MPL = 0. Therefore, such
disguised unemployed are to be transferred to industrial sector at the constant institutional
wage.
[3]
In the second stage of FR model (phase) agri. workers add to agri. output but they
produce less than institutional wage they get. In other words, in the second stage the labor
surplus exists where APL > MPL, but it is not equal to subsistence (institutional) wages.
Accordingly, such disguised unemployed also have to be transferred to the industrial
sector. If the migration to the industrial sector continues a situation is eventually reached
where the farm workers produce output equal to institutional wages. This would mean that
productivity in the agriculture sector has gone up. With this the third phase (stage) starts.
In the third stage of FR model the take-off situation comes to an end and there begins
the era of self-sustained growth where the farm workers produce more than the
institutional wage they get. In this stage of economic growth, the surplus labor comes to an
end and the agri. sector becomes a commercialized sector. All such is explained with the
Fig.
Accordingly, they have to be shifted to the industrial sector. As labor are transferred to
industrial sector a shortage of labor will develop in agri. sector. In other words, it will be
difficult for the industrial sector to get the labor at same prevailing constant wages. As a
result, the wages in the industrial sector will rise as from T to Q in (a) part of Fig.
After point T the turn which occurs in the SZ curve is known as "Lewis Turning Point". In
the 3rd phase the agri. laborers produce more than CIW. (As here MPL > CIW shown in (c)
part of Fig). In this phase the take-off comes to an end and self-sustained growth starts.
This is also known as point of commercialization (of agri.) in FR model. Here the
economy is fully commercialized in the absence of disguised unemployment. Such
commercialization took place at the cost of absorption of disguised unemployment in
industrial sector.
of widespread famine and misery have not materialized on a global scale, his ideas have
influenced discussions about population, resources, and sustainability throughout history.
4.b) Briefly explain the Lewis economic development model with suitable
graph.
In Lewis model the transformation process or the process of structural change starts by
an autonomous expansion in demand in industry as a result of changes in domestic
consumer tastes, in government purchases, or in international markets. When these
profits are ploughed back into industrial capital formation, demand for industrial
output (both for consumption goods by newly employed workers and investment by
capitalists) rises, causing further shifts of labour out of agriculture into industry.
The process comes to a halt when agricultural productivity rises to a point where the
supply price of labour to industry increases, i.e., a point at which agricultural
alternatives of output and income are sufficiently attractive to the would-be industrial
workers to keep them in farming. In the absence of rural-urban differences in the cost
of living, this occurs when the marginal product of labour in the two sectors are equal.
Since there is surplus labour from the subsistence sector, the capitalist sector draws its
labour from the subsistence sector and it is assumed that as a result of rapid increases
in population in already densely populated countries the supply of unskilled labour is
unlimited.
Lewis has assumed and made the point that capitalists will have to pay a margin of
about 30% above average subsistence pay, because the surplus workers need some
incentive to move and in any case part of the difference is needed to compensate them
for the higher cost of living in urban areas. This surplus is the key to the Lewis model of
development. In Fig. 14 OS is the average product of the subsistence sector—the
amount a man would receive there. Here, OW is the capitalist wage. We start with a
fixed quantity of capital, and in this situation the demand for labour is represented by
the marginal productivity schedule of labour NQ. Under profit-maximizing conditions,
labour will be applied to the point where the wage, W, equals marginal productivity,
i.e., Q1, corresponding to Oa number of workers. Workers in excess of O a will earn
whatever they can in the subsistence sector.
in the subsistence sector will start to rise, causing wages in the capitalist sector to rise,
and then the first phase of development will have ceased as the supply curve of labour
has ceased to be horizontal, but has turned up wards.
Criticisms:
The Lewis model is close to the Ricardian one. It neglects the central concern of
Ricardo: how the price of food is to be held down. If it he assumed, however, that the
supply of labour to industry is infinitely elastic at a steady wage because of surplus
labour in agriculture, this can help explain initial development which comes to an end
when wages start to rise with increased capital formation.
SET B
5. a) Briefly explicate the market structure of agricultural marketing system in
LDCs.
In many Least Developed Countries (LDCs), the agricultural marketing system often
exhibits characteristics of imperfect or traditional market structures rather than the well-
defined market structures seen in more developed economies. Here's a brief explication of
the market structure of agricultural marketing systems in LDCs:
1. **Fragmentation**: Agricultural markets in LDCs are often highly fragmented, with
numerous small-scale farmers producing diverse crops and often lacking coordination
among themselves. This fragmentation can lead to inefficiencies in production,
distribution, and marketing.
2. **Informality**: Many agricultural markets in LDCs operate informally, with
transactions occurring through traditional channels such as local markets, roadside stalls,
or direct sales from farm to consumer. This informal nature can result in limited market
information, lack of price transparency, and difficulties in enforcing regulations.
3. **Limited Infrastructure**: LDCs often have inadequate infrastructure for
agricultural marketing, including poor transportation networks, storage facilities, and
market infrastructure. This lack of infrastructure can hinder the efficient movement of
agricultural products from rural areas to urban markets, leading to high transaction costs
and post-harvest losses.
4. **Weak Institutions**: Agricultural marketing systems in LDCs may suffer from weak
institutional support, including inadequate market regulations, limited access to credit and
insurance, and insufficient extension services for farmers. These institutional weaknesses
can constrain market efficiency and hinder the adoption of modern agricultural practices.
5. **Market Power**: In some cases, agricultural markets in LDCs may be dominated by
a few powerful intermediaries, such as traders, processors, or input suppliers, who exercise
significant market power. This concentration of market power can lead to exploitative
practices, unfair pricing, and limited bargaining power for small-scale farmers.
6. **Vulnerability to External Shocks**: Agricultural markets in LDCs are often
highly vulnerable to external shocks, such as adverse weather conditions, fluctuations in
[10]
global commodity prices, or trade disruptions. These shocks can exacerbate food
insecurity, rural poverty, and economic instability in LDCs.
Overall, the market structure of agricultural marketing systems in LDCs is characterized by
fragmentation, informality, limited infrastructure, weak institutions, market power
dynamics, and vulnerability to external shocks. Addressing these challenges requires
comprehensive strategies that promote market integration, improve infrastructure and
institutions, strengthen value chains, and enhance the resilience of rural livelihoods.
5. b) Define money market. Briefly explain the nature and role of rural money market.
The money market refers to a segment of the financial market where short-term
borrowing and lending of funds occur. It deals with instruments that have a maturity
period typically ranging from overnight to one year. The primary participants in the money
market are financial institutions, corporations, governments, and central banks.
The rural money market refers to the segment of the financial market that operates
specifically within rural areas, catering to the financial needs of rural households,
agricultural enterprises, and small businesses. It functions similarly to the broader money
market but with a focus on rural areas and their unique characteristics.
Nature of the Rural Money Market:
1. **Localized Operations**: The rural money market primarily operates within rural
communities, often in areas where access to formal financial institutions may be limited.
2. **Informality**: In many cases, the rural money market operates through informal
channels, including local moneylenders, savings groups, and cooperatives, alongside
formal financial institutions such as rural banks and microfinance institutions.
3. **Short-Term Financing**: Similar to the broader money market, the rural money
market deals with short-term financial instruments with maturities ranging from overnight
to one year. These instruments may include short-term loans, agricultural credit, savings
products, and microfinance loans.
4. **Focus on Agriculture and Rural Development**: The rural money market is
particularly focused on financing agricultural activities, rural development projects, and
small-scale enterprises that contribute to the rural economy.
Role of the Rural Money Market:
1. **Providing Access to Finance**: The rural money market plays a crucial role in
providing access to finance for rural households, smallholder farmers, and rural
entrepreneurs who may have limited access to formal banking services.
2. **Supporting Agricultural Activities**: By providing short-term financing for
agricultural inputs, equipment purchases, and crop production, the rural money market
supports the growth and development of the agricultural sector in rural areas.
3. **Facilitating Savings and Investment**: The rural money market offers various
savings and investment products tailored to the needs of rural savers, helping them
accumulate funds for future expenses, emergencies, or investments in income-generating
activities.
[11]
7 a) What are the factors determining the types and size of farms?
The type and size of a farm can be determined by various factors, including:
1. **Location**: Climate, soil type, topography, and access to water can dictate the type of
crops that can be grown and the suitability for livestock farming.
2. **Market Demand**: Farmers often consider market demand for certain products
when deciding what to produce. They may choose crops or livestock that have a higher
demand in their region or that fetch better prices.
3. **Available Resources**: This includes land availability, capital investment, labor
availability, and access to machinery and technology. These resources can influence both
the type and size of the farm.
4. **Government Policies**: Subsidies, regulations, and incentives provided by the
government can impact the type of farming practices and the size of farms.
5. **Farmers' Expertise and Preferences**: Farmers' skills, knowledge, and
preferences play a significant role in determining the type of farming they undertake. Some
farmers may have expertise in a particular type of crop or livestock, influencing their
choices.
6. **Environmental Considerations**: Concerns about sustainability and
environmental impact can influence farming practices. Some farmers may opt for organic
farming or adopt conservation practices, which can affect the type and size of the farm.
7. **Market Accessibility**: Proximity to markets and transportation infrastructure can
influence the scale and type of farming. Farmers may choose to produce perishable goods
closer to markets to minimize transportation costs and maximize freshness.
8. **Risk Management**: Farmers may consider risk factors such as weather patterns,
pests, diseases, and market volatility when determining the type and size of their farms.
Diversification and scale of operations can be strategies to mitigate risks.
These factors interact in complex ways, and farmers often need to balance multiple
considerations when making decisions about their farm type and size.
and productivity. They may also have the capacity to adopt advanced farming techniques,
such as precision agriculture, that can improve yields and reduce waste.
3. **Access to Resources**: Larger farms may have better access to financial capital,
land, labor, inputs, and markets, which can contribute to higher productivity. They may be
able to invest in irrigation, mechanization, fertilizers, and improved seeds, which can
increase yields and output.
4. **Management Capacity**: Larger farms may have more professional management
structures and capabilities, allowing for better planning, decision-making, and
implementation of farming practices. This can lead to improved productivity through
better utilization of resources and adoption of modern technologies.
5. **Risk Management**: Larger farms may have greater resilience to risks such as
weather fluctuations, market volatility, and pest outbreaks, due to their diversification,
scale, and resources. This can help maintain stable production levels and reduce the impact
of adverse events on productivity.
6. **Local Context**: The relationship between farm size and productivity can vary
significantly depending on the local context and specific conditions. In some cases, small-
scale farms may be more productive per unit of land or labor due to factors such as
intensive cultivation, agroecological practices, or niche markets.
7. **Social and Environmental Considerations**: Small-scale farming systems may
play important roles in preserving biodiversity, maintaining cultural heritage, and
promoting sustainable land management practices. While larger farms may achieve higher
productivity levels, they may also face challenges related to environmental degradation,
social equity, and rural livelihoods.
Overall, the relationship between farm size and productivity is influenced by a complex
interplay of factors, and there is no one-size-fits-all answer. Both small-scale and large-
scale farming systems have unique strengths and challenges, and policies should aim to
support diverse agricultural models while promoting sustainable and equitable
development.
[15]