Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Personality Psychology
Week 13: Applications of Personality II
Friedrich M. Götz, Ph.D.
Yilin Guo
Gordon Heltzel
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia
Welcome Back & Land
Acknowledgement
Brief
Survey
Please write
down your
chosen
response
number for
each of the 3
10 items
Today’s Learning Goals
• (1) Discuss the personality predictors of relationship
success.
• (2) Discuss the personality predictors of relationship
failure.
• (3) Evaluate evidence for personality-based romantic
preferences.
• (4) Consider the centrality of relationship-specific
variables for the explanation of relationship success. 4
Personality & Relationship Success
5
Dealmakers (Back et al., 2023; Funder, 2019)
9
Personality & Relationship Struggles
10
Deal Breakers
• Aspects of personality that prevent or undermine
relationships
• Introversion, disagreeableness
• Untrustworthiness, anger issues
• Rejection sensitivity
• Dispositional contempt
11
Dispositional Contempt (Schriber et al., 2017)
12
Contempt & Relationships
13
What Are YOU Looking For?
14
Personality-Based Preferences
• Cross-cultural study in Turkey, Pakistan, and Iran (Atari et al., 2019)
• Agreeable individuals prefer kind and dependable partners (all 3
countries)
• Open individuals prefer less religious partners (Iran, Turkey; not
Pakistan)
15
Personality-Based Preferences
• Large-scale study with over 500,000 users
and 421 potential matches on Hinge (Levy et
al., 2019)
18
Overestimating Personality Similarity
• Cross-cultural study in Brazil and the Czech Republic (Štěrbová et al.,
2017):
• Ideal partners: Men prefer self-similar partners in all Big Five
characteristics, but Neuroticism.
• Actual partners: Homogamy in personality in actual couples exists but
is considerably lower.
• Homogamy in personality is most consistent for Extraversion, and to
some degree for Openness and Conscientiousness (in heterosexual
couples)
19
In the End It’s More About Us Than You & Me
20
Determinants of Fulfilled Relationships
• Analysis of 11,196 romantic couples across 43
longitudinal dyadic datasets (Joel et al., 2019)
• Machine learning analysis to predict relationship quality
• Most important predictors (account for 45% of current relationship satisfaction)
are about the relationship itself:
• Perceived-partner commitment, appreciation, sexual satisfaction, perceived-
partner satisfaction, and conflict
• Individual differences matter as well (account for 21% of current relationship
satisfaction) but are less important; most important predictors (Big Five not
measured):
• Life satisfaction, affect, depression, attachment style 21
Due TODAY (11.59pm, Canvas):
Personal Reflection
Think about the most important relationship in your life. Do the personalities
of the people involved contribute to the challenges and the beauty of the
relationship? If yes, how?
22
THANK YOU! That’s all for today!
Enjoy the rest of your day and see
you on Wednesday!
23