Unidades Franqueadas:

Curso:
Nível:

ATENÇÃO
Antes de qualquer inclusão de notas, Student's Name
inclua primeiro a listagem de alunos em
"Student's Name" e para a inclusão de
notas, clique nos botões abaixo.
Isabella Barbosa dos Santos
Victor Henrique dos Reis Santos

INCLUSÃO DE NOTAS Manoela Bichara Barcelos Gonçalves

Laura Matta de Azevedo Barra
Caroline Vieira Pereira
Miguel Jorge Solano Ribeiro
Writing Bits Teodoro Paro Vinhal

Checkpoints

Speaking Moments & Project

Speaking & Writing Showcase

a

A
 MACAÉ - RJ Turma: PT2 MF2
PLUS TEEN Dias: seg/qua
2 Professor: Yasmim

Resumo de Notas - Mid-term

Speaking Moments
Writing Bits Checkpoints & Project Writing Bits

8.75 7.00 7.00 10.00

9.58 8.50
9.17 7.50
8.75 7.50
8.75 8.25
8.00 7.50
8.00 7.50
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
8.50 0.00
7.50 0.00
7.50 0.00
8.25 0.00
7.50 0.00
7.50 0.00
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
smim

Resumo de Notas - End-of-term

Speaking Writing
Writing
Checkpoints Moments & Showcase (x2 Speaking Showcase
Showcase Weight Grade)
Project
10.00 10.00 10.00 20.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
- - - - -
 Speaking
Showcase (x2 Final Grade
Weight Grade)

0.00 7.28
0.00 2.66
0.00 2.42
0.00 2.38
0.00 2.53
0.00 2.30
0.00 2.30
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
Resumo de notas Writi

Student's Name

Isabella Barbosa dos Santos

Victor Henrique dos Reis Santos
Manoela Bichara Barcelos Gonçalves
Laura Matta de Azevedo Barra
Caroline Vieira Pereira
Miguel Jorge Solano Ribeiro
Teodoro Paro Vinhal
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Writi
Student's Name
Isabella Barbosa dos Santos
Victor Henrique dos Reis Santos
Manoela Bichara Barcelos Gonçalves
Laura Matta de Azevedo Barra
Caroline Vieira Pereira
Miguel Jorge Solano Ribeiro
Teodoro Paro Vinhal
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
 Writing Bit 1

Content & Task

Language Text organisation Average
achievement

Band 3,5 Band 3 Band 3 7.92

Band 4 Band 3,5 Band 3,5 9.17
Band 4 Band 3,5 Band 3,5 9.17
Band 3,5 Band 3 Band 3 7.92
Band 3,5 Band 3 Band 3 7.92
Band 3,5 Band 3 Band 3 7.92
Band 3,5 Band 3 Band 3 7.92
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

Writing Bit 3
Content & Task
Language Text organisation Average
achievement
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
 Writing Bit 2

Content & Task

Language Text organisation Average
achievement

Band 4 Band 3,5 Band 4 9.58

Band 4 Band 4 Band 4 10.00
Band 4 Band 3 Band 4 9.17
Band 4 Band 3,5 Band 4 9.58
Band 4 Band 3,5 Band 4 9.58
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

Writing Bit 4
Content & Task
Language Text organisation Average
achievement
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Writing Bits 1 &2

Average Grade

8.75
9.58
9.17
8.75
8.75
3.96
3.96
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

Writing Bits 3 & 4

Average Grade
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
 Bands Notas
Band 4 10.00
Band 3,5 8.75
Band 3 7.50
Band 2,5 6.25
Band 2 5.00
Band 1,5 3.75
Band 1 2.50
Band 0 0.00

Writing Guidelines
Content & Task achievement
Relevance
Communicative message
Number of words

Language
Target grammar & lexis
Range
Accuracy

Text organisation
Coherence
Cohesion
Genre
Re-submission requested: below 60%
Re-submission encouraged: between 79% and 60%
All content is relevant to the proposed task. The communicative message i
The content is mostly relevant to the proposed task. The communicative messa
The content is partially relevant to the proposed task. The communicative mess
The content is (mostly) irrelevant. The communicative message is minimally/not
The content is irrelevant. The communicative message is not transmitted.
The student is able to use a wide range of structures and vocabulary appropriat
The student is able to use a range of structures and vocabulary appropriate for
The student shows a limited range of structures and vocabulary for the target le
The student shows a very limited range of structures and vocabulary for the targ
The student shows an irrelevant range of structures and vocabulary for the
The text is well-organised, cohesive and coherent. The elements of the text are
The text is generally well-organised, cohesive and coherent. The elements of th
The text is partially (well-) organised, cohesive and/or coherent. The elements o
The text is (mostly) disorganised, incohesive and/or incoherent. The elements o
The text is disorganised. The communicative message is not transmitted.
BANDS
4
3
2
1
0
Bands
4
3
2
1
0
Bands
4
3
2
1
0
Resumo de notas
Checkpoint
Student's Name
Checkpoint 1

Isabella Barbosa dos Santos

Victor Henrique dos Reis Santos 9.00
Manoela Bichara Barcelos Gonçalves
Laura Matta de Azevedo Barra
Caroline Vieira Pereira 8.50
Miguel Jorge Solano Ribeiro
Teodoro Paro Vinhal
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Checkp
Student's Name
Checkpoint 3

Isabella Barbosa dos Santos

Victor Henrique dos Reis Santos
Manoela Bichara Barcelos Gonçalves
Laura Matta de Azevedo Barra
Caroline Vieira Pereira
Miguel Jorge Solano Ribeiro
Teodoro Paro Vinhal
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Checkpoints - Mid-term Checkpoints

Checkpoint 2 Average Grade Average Grade

0.00 0.00
8.00 8.50 8.50
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
8.00 8.25 8.25
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00

Checkpoints - End-of-term
Checkpoint 4 Checkpoint 5 Average Grade

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Checkpoints

Average Grade

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Resumo de notas

Student's Name

Isabella Barbosa dos Santos

Victor Henrique dos Reis Santos
Manoela Bichara Barcelos Gonçalves
Laura Matta de Azevedo Barra
Caroline Vieira Pereira
Miguel Jorge Solano Ribeiro
Teodoro Paro Vinhal
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Student's Name
 Student's Name

Isabella Barbosa dos Santos

Victor Henrique dos Reis Santos
Manoela Bichara Barcelos Gonçalves
Laura Matta de Azevedo Barra
Caroline Vieira Pereira
Miguel Jorge Solano Ribeiro
Teodoro Paro Vinhal
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
 Speakin
Communication and Collaboration Engagement 1
The student is able to convey intended
message in English and shows clarity
The student contributes with ideas and
of arguments. The student works
engages with activities and homework
collaboratively with peers towards the
assignments
co-construction of knowledge and
meaning

Communication and Collaboration Engagement

The student is able to convey intended
message in English and shows clarity
The student contributes with ideas and
of arguments. The student works
engages with activities and homework
collaboratively with peers towards the
assignments
co-construction of knowledge and
meaning
 Speaking Moments & Project - Mid-term
Language 1 Critical thinking & Autonomy

The student is able to use appropriate

The student poses relevant questions,
grammar, vocabulary and
analyses problems and proposes
pronunciation expected for
solutions
the level.

Speaking Moments & Project - End-of-term

Language 1 Critical thinking & Autonomy
The student is able to use appropriate
The student poses relevant questions,
grammar, vocabulary and
analyses problems and proposes
pronunciation expected for
solutions
the level.
king & Autonomy 1

The student has a positive attitude Average Grade

to self and peer asssessment
activities and acts upon feedback

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

of-term
king & Autonomy 1 Project development & achievement 1
The student has a positive attitude The student played an active role in all
to self and peer asssessment stages of the project, contributing to a
activities and acts upon feedback successful project outcome
 Racional
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###

Average Grade
Average Grade

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Resumo de notas

Students´ names

Isabella Barbosa dos Santos

Victor Henrique dos Reis Santos
Manoela Bichara Barcelos Gonçalves
Laura Matta de Azevedo Barra
Caroline Vieira Pereira
Miguel Jorge Solano Ribeiro
Teodoro Paro Vinhal
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Student's Name
 Student's Name

Isabella Barbosa dos Santos

Victor Henrique dos Reis Santos
Manoela Bichara Barcelos Gonçalves
Laura Matta de Azevedo Barra
Caroline Vieira Pereira
Miguel Jorge Solano Ribeiro
Teodoro Paro Vinhal
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
 Speaking Showcase - Individua

The student's speech was clear

The student used a range of
and audible (despite technical
discourse markers and linking words
issues). Adequate use of stress
for organising own discourse.
and intonation.

Writing Showcase
 Writing Showcase

Content & Task achievement Language

g Showcase - Individual Evaluation

The student was able to use The student's linguistic

appropriate resources to command ( grammar and
sustain speech for vocabulary) was adequate to
specified time. the target level.

Showcase
Showcase

Text organisation Média

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
 Speaking Show

The student attempted to engage The content of the presentation

the audience. was relevant.
 Bands
Band 4
Band 3,5
Band 3
Band 2,5
Band 2
Band 1,5
Band 1
Band 0
Writing Guidelines
Content & Task achievement
Relevance
Communicative message
Number of words

Language
Target grammar & lexis
Range
Accuracy

Text organisation
Coherence
Cohesion
Genre
 Speaking Showcase - Group Evaluation

Students delivered the

The presentation was structured presentation within the
and organised. time
alloted.
Notas
10.00
8.75
7.50
6.25
5.00
3.75
2.50
0.00

All content is relevant to the proposed task. The co

The content is mostly relevant to the proposed task
The content is partially relevant to the proposed tas
The content is (mostly) irrelevant. The communicat
The content is irrelevant. The communicative m
The student is able to use a wide range of structure
The student is able to use a range of structures an
The student shows a limited range of structures an
The student shows a very limited range of structure
The student shows no range of structures and v
The text is well-organised, cohesive and coherent.
The text is generally well-organised, cohesive and
The text is partially (well-) organised, cohesive and
The text is (mostly) disorganised, incohesive and/o
The text is disorganised, incohesive and/or inco
 Average Grade
Students addressed the audience
´s questions and comments
appropriately

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o the proposed task. The communicative message is clearly transmitted to the target
elevant to the proposed task. The communicative message is transmitted to the targe
relevant to the proposed task. The communicative message is transmitted to a certain
irrelevant. The communicative message is minimally/not transmitted. Most/all points
ant. The communicative message is not transmitted. All points are omitted.
use a wide range of structures and vocabulary appropriate for the level. There are ver
use a range of structures and vocabulary appropriate for the level. There are some in
mited range of structures and vocabulary for the target level. There are many innacur
ery limited range of structures and vocabulary for the target level. Innacuracies obscu
o range of structures and vocabulary for the target level. Innacuracies obscure c
ed, cohesive and coherent. The elements of the text are fully appropriate to the genre
ell-organised, cohesive and coherent. The elements of the text are usually appropriate
ll-) organised, cohesive and/or coherent. The elements of the text are partially approp
organised, incohesive and/or incoherent. The elements of the text are ( mostly) inappr
ed, incohesive and/or incoherent. The elements of the text are inappropriate to t
 ted to the target reader. All points are covered and properly developed.
itted to the target reader. Most points are covered and/or developed.
mitted to a certain extent. Points are somewhat covered and/or developed.
d. Most/all points are omitted.
re omitted.
el. There are very few innacuracies which do not obscure communication.
here are some innacuracies which may obscure communication.
re many innacuracies which often obscure communication.
nacuracies obscure communication.
acies obscure communication.
riate to the genre ( format, register, layout)
ually appropriate to the genre ( format, register, layout)
e partially appropriate to the genre ( format, register, layout)
e ( mostly) inappropriate to the genre ( format, register, layout)
appropriate to the genre ( format, register, layout)
 Bands
4
3
oped. 2
1
0
Bands
ation. 4
3
2
1
0
Bands
4
3
2
1
0