Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://informationmatters.org | editor@informationmatters.org
Page 1
context. This makes it difficult for sentiment analysis algorithms to effectively identify sarcasm, irony,
or tricky phrases, thus leading to sentiment misclassification. Furthermore, cultural and regional
linguistic variances hinder the formulation of universal sentiment analysis models.
Subjectivity and Opinion Variability: Investment decision making is an advanced process that
requires analysing financial data and market dynamics. Sentiment analysis depends on collecting
subjective opinions conveyed in text, which can vary greatly between people and sources. Divergent
feelings may result from various investors’ interpretations of the same information. Sentiment analysis
methods frequently find it difficult to account for all of
these differences, potentially leading to biassed or
incorrect sentiment classifications.
Data Quality and Noise: The validity and accuracy of
the underlying data provide an obvious issue in sentiment
analysis for investment decision making. Financial
publications and posts to social media are vulnerable to
noise, such as redundant or misleading material, spam,
or intentional manipulation. The inclusion of noise in the
data might affect sentiment analysis results and
endanger investment decision making accuracy. It is
crucial to prevent this problem by ensuring data quality and adopting effective filtering techniques.
Limited Contextual Understanding of Financial Jargon: Financial organisations have their own
specialised vocabulary and technical terms, which sentiment analysis models often struggle to fully
comprehend. Understanding the meanings and links between financial words and concepts
necessitates subject expertise. Sentiment analysis algorithms that lack this domain expertise may
struggle to read sentiment in financial writing, potentially leading to misclassifications and incorrect
findings.
Data Availability and Timeliness: The lack of data availability and timeliness provides major barriers
to sentiment analysis for investment decision making. Making informed financial decisions requires
real-time market sentiment. Accessing reliable and up-to-date sentiment data, on the other hand,
might be daunting, especially in the case of financial publications or social media posts, which may
have reporting delays or information dissemination gaps. For rapid investing strategies, delayed or
outdated sentiment analysis data may be worthless.
Lack of Ground Truth Labels: For supervised learning, labelled data with valid ground truth
sentiment labels is often required for training sentiment analysis models. Obtaining broad and precise
sentiment labels for financial text, on the other hand, is difficult to do. The subjectivity and
complexities of financial sentiment make reaching an agreement on the ground truth difficult.
Furthermore, sentiment labelling is subjective and may differ amongst annotators, thus adding biases
to the training data.
Page 2
Page 3