Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WIRE ROPE
CHAPTER
WR
WIRE ROPE
he IADC Drilling Manual is a series of reference guides assembled by volunteer drilling-industry professionals with
T expertise spanning a broad range of topics. These volunteers contributed their time, energy and knowledge in
developing the IADC Drilling Manual, 12th edition, to help facilitate safe and efficient drilling operations, training, and
equipment maintenance and repair.
The contents of this manual should not replace or take precedence over manufacturer, operator or individual drilling
company recommendations, policies or procedures. In jurisdictions where the contents of the IADC Drilling Manual
may conflict with regional, state or national statute or regulation, IADC strongly advises adhering to local rules.
While IADC believes the information presented is accurate as of the date of publication, each reader is responsible
for his own reliance, reasonable or otherwise, on the information presented. Readers should be aware that technology
and practices advance quickly, and the subject matter discussed herein may quickly become surpassed. If professional
engineering expertise is required, the services of a competent individual or firm should be sought. Neither IADC nor the
contributors to this chapter warrant or guarantee that application of any theory, concept, method or action described in this
book will lead to the result desired by the reader.
Authors
Brent Dein, WireCo WorldGroup
Dennis Fetter, WireCo WorldGroup
ISBN: 978-0-9915095-7-7
CHAPTER WR
IADC brings the collective knowledge and experience of the global drilling industry
to the workforce through industry-developed print, electronic and multimedia tools
and resources accessible in one convenient location.
From books to industry news to manuals and more—IADC is the definitive source.
The Technical Resources Center contains a variety of items, including:
• IADC Bookstore and e-Bookstore: textbooks, guidelines, checklists, model
contracts and more.
• Online Safety Toolbox: Safety Alerts, safety meeting topics, near hit/miss
forms and safety posters.
• Knowledge, Skill & Ability (KSA) Competencies Database: filter competencies
based on various criteria and generate a unique set of KSAs for each type of
position on a rig.
• Industry news: quick access to Drilling Contractor magazine and IADC Drill Bits
newsletter.
• Reports: Onshore and Offshore US Federal Regulatory Summaries and the
International Regulatory Summary provide easy to access updated information
on industry regulation.
www.IADC.org/technical-resources
WIRE ROPE WR–1
Introduction Definition
The drilling line is a machine. It is an assembly of precision Drilling lines and wire lines are known as and are used inter-
parts, each can move independently, requires lubrication, is changeably with the term “wire rope”. Reference to all three
static until an external force is applied and it transmits energy. of these terms will be prevalent throughout this manual.
The information that follows will guide you in the selection, Wire rope is an intricate network of close tolerance, precision
care and use of drilling lines. Instructions are included for made steel wires, much on the order of a machine, where
attaching wire rope clips, socketing wire rope, seizing wire each part has a job to do. Each part must work in a perfect
rope, etc. relationship with the other part for the rope to properly func-
tion. Proper care and handling is mandatory to receive the
To keep the wire line costs at a minimum, the rig crews and
highest service at the highest level of safety.
all levels of operations management should know how to ob-
tain maximum safe life from the drilling line. The following is
basic to that objective. Nomenclature
Wire rope comprises just three parts—core, strand and wire
A. Select the proper size and type line to meet the
(Figure WR-1).
requirements.
B. Care for the line to prevent damage. Become familiar with each part; it is surprising how many
C. Compute the service obtained from the line in times a “wire” is reported to be a “strand”.
Ton-Miles.
Each of the components are detailed later in this manual.
D. Choose a cut-off program that best suits your
Wire rope is described and identified with numerals and ab-
conditions and follow it carefully. This will greatly
breviations. It is important to understand these terms and
increase the service obtained from the line.
to relate them to the wire rope specified within our industry.
When a new line is received, the reel number, make and
The following is an example description of a rotary drilling
description of the line should be recorded on the daily
line; the identifying terms are translated and explained
drilling report.
individually.
The ton-mile service should be computed daily and a record
5,000 ft × 1 in. 6×19 S-IWRC EIP SZ (RR) PRF
kept so cut-offs can be made after a proper interval of service.
5,000 ft = Length of wire rope, ft
1 in. = Nominal diameter of wire rope, in.
6 = Number of outer strands per wire rope
19 = Number of wires per outer strand
S = Seale outer strand wire pattern
Core
IWRC = Independent wire rope core
Strand
Wire EIP = Extra improved plow steel
SZ (RR) = Right regular lay
PRF = Preformed strands
This translates to a 5,000 ft length of 1 in. diameter, 6-strand
rope with 19 wires in each strand laid in a Seale pattern (S).
The strands of the rope are laid around an Independent Wire
Rope Core. The strength grade of the rope is Extra Improved
Plow Steel (EIP). The strands are laid in a Right Regular Lay
(SZ or RR) pattern and are preformed (PRF) in a helical shape
Rope prior to closing the rope.
6×19 6 16 through 26
8×19 8 16 through 26
Most ropes are manufactured larger than the nominal diam- Single layer
eter. When first placed in operation, strands of new unused
rope will “seat in” and “pull down” from its original diame-
ter. Therefore, measurements recorded for future reference
and comparison should be taken after the rope has been in
service for a short period of time. See Table WR-1 for rope
diameter vs. tolerances.
Table WR-1: Rope diameter vs. tolerance. Figure WR-3: Example of a single-layer strand.
Combined patterns
When a strand is formed in a single operation using two or
more of the foregoing constructions, it is referred to as a
“combined pattern”. Beginning from the center wire, the first
two layers constitute a Seale pattern. The third layer, with
two different wire sizes is a Warrington pattern. The fourth
layer of the same diameter wires forms a Seale pattern.
Seale
The Seale construction has two layers of wires around a
center wire with the same number of wires in each layer. All
wires in each layer are the same diameter and the strand
Figure WR-7: Strands formed in a single operations using two or
is designed so that the larger outer wires rest in the valleys
more of the foregoing constructions is called a “combined pattern.”
between the smaller inner wires. Above is 49 Seal Warrington Seale (1-8-8-(8+8)-16) strand.
Preforming
Preforming is a process by which strands are helically
formed into the shape they will assume in the finished rope.
When a preformed rope is cut, the end does not unlay. If strands
are unlayed from the rope, they retain their helical shape. When
Figure WR-5: Seale construction features two layers of wires
around a center wire, with the same number of wires in a non-performed rope is cut, it will open up or "broom" unless
each layer. This example is 19 Seale (1-9-9) strand. the end has been secured (seized) before cutting.
Lay
The first element in describing Lay is the DIRECTION of
Figure WR-6: Warrington construction features two layers strands lay in the rope—Right or Left. When you look along
of wires. The inner is a single size wire, and the outer has a rope, strands of a Right Lay rope spiral to the right. Left Lay
two wire diameters, alternating large and small. Drawing is rope spirals to the left.
of 19 Warrington (1-6-(6+6) strand.
The second element in describing lay is the relationship be- The grade of rope refers to the strength of a new unused
tween the direction the strands lay in the rope and direction wire rope. Standard 6 strand EEIP ropes within the same
the wires lay in the strands. classification and having an IWRC have a nominal strength
about 10% higher than EIP ropes.
In Regular Lay, wires are laid opposite the direction the
strands lay in the rope. In appearance, the wires in Regular Galvanized ropes are those in which the individual wires
Lay are parallel to the axis of the rope. have had a zinc coating applied to their surface to provide
increased corrosion resistance. The proper grade of rope to
The second element in describing lay is the relationship be-
use depends on the specific characteristics of the application.
tween the direction the strands lay in the rope and direction
the wires lay in the strands.
Cores
In Regular Lay, wires are laid opposite the direction the
The primary purpose of a core in wire rope is to provide a
strands lay in the rope. In appearance, the wires in Regular
foundation or support for the strands. Approximately 7 ½%
Lay are parallel to the axis of the rope.
of the nominal strength of a 6-strand IWRC rope is attribut-
ed to the core.
Wire rope cores are usually one of three types (Figure WR-
12). The first, fiber core (top) is either of natural fiber, such as
sisal or man-made fiber, such as polypropylene. The second,
independent wire rope core (center) is literally an indepen-
dent wire rope called IWRC. Finally, strand core (bottom) is
Figure WR-9: Left lay, regular lay.
a strand composed of wires.
In Lang Lay, wires are laid the same direction as the strands lay in
the rope and the wires appear to cross the rope axis at an angle.
The third element in describing lay is that one rope lay is the
length along the rope axis which one strand uses to make
one complete helix around the core.
Table WR-4: Typical sizes and constructions of wire rope for oilfield service.
Service and well depth Wire rope inches Wire rope description
Rod & Tubing Pull Lines
Shallow 1/2 to 3/4 incl. 6×26 WS or 6×31 WS
Intermediate 3/4, 7/8 RRL or LRL IPS,EIP or EEIP, IWRC
Deep 7/8 to 11/8 incl.
Rod Hanger Lines 1/4 6×19, RRL, IPS, FC
Sand Lines
Shallow 1/4 to 1/2 incl.
Intermediate 1/2, 9/16 6×7 or 5×7 or 5×7 Swaged Bright or Galv.2, RRL IPS, FC
Deep 9/16, 5/8
Drilling Lines—Cable Tool (Drilling & Cleanout)
Shallow 5/8, 3/4
Intermediate 3/4, 7/8 6×21 FW, RRL or LRL, PS or IPS, FC
Deep 7/8, 1
Casing Lines—Cable Tool
Shallow 3/4, 7/8
Intermediate 7/8, 1 6×25 FW, RRL, IPS, FC or IWRC
Deep 1, 1 1/8 6x25 FW, RRL, IPS or ElP, IWRC
Drilling Line—Coring and Slim-Hole Rotary Rigs
Shallow 7/8, 1 6×26 WS, RRL, IPS or EIP, IWRC
Intermediate 1, 1 1/8 6×19 S or 6×26 WS, RRL, EIP or EEIP, IWRC
May have compacted strands or be plastic impregnated.
Drilling Lines—Large Rotary Rigs
Shallow 1, 1 1/8 6×19 S or 6×21 S or 6×26WS, RRL, EIP or EEIP, IWRC.
May have compacted strands or be plastic impregnated
Deep 1 1/4 to 2 incl.
5/8 to 7/8 incl. 6×26 WS or 6×31 WS, RRL, IPS EIP or EEIP, IWRC
Winch Lines—Heavy Duty
7/8 to 1 1/8 incl. 6×36 WS, PF, RRL, IPS EIP or EEIP, IWRC
Horsehead Pumping—Unit Lines
Shallow 1/2 to 1 1/8 incl.4 6×19 Class or 6×36 Class or 19×7, IPS, FC or IWRC
Intermediate 5/8 to 1 1/8 incl.3 6×19 Class or 6×36 Class, IPS, FC or IWRC
7/8 to 2 3/4 incl. 6×19 Class, Bright or GaIv., RRL, ElP or EEIP, IWRC
Offshore Anchorage Lines 1 3/8 to 4 3/4 incl. 6×36 Class, Bright or GaIv., RRL, ElP or EEIP, IWRC
3 3/4 to 4 3/4 incl. 6×61 Class, Bright or GaIv., RRL, ElP or EEIP, IWRC
Mast Raising Lines5 1 3/8 and smaller 6×19 Class, RRL, EIP or EEIP, IWRC
1 1/2 and larger 6×36 Class, RRL, EIP or EEIP, IWRC
Guideline Tensioner Line 3/4 6×25 FW, RRL, IPS or EIP, IWRC
6×36 WS or 6×41 WS or 6×41 SFW or
6×49 SWS, RRL, IPS or EIP, IWRC or
Riser Tensioner Lines 1 1/2 and larger
8×36 class RL IWRC
May have compacted strands and/or be plastic impregnated.
Abbreviations
WS Warrington Seale IPS Improved Plow Steel RRL Right Lay
S Seale ElPS Extra Improved Plow Steel LRL Left Lay
FW Filler-Wire PRF Preformed FC Fiber Core
PS Plow Steel NPF Non-preformed IWRC Independent Wire Rope Core
2
Bright wire sand lines are regularly finished; galvanized finish is sometimes required.
3
pplies to pumping units having one piece of wire rope looped over an ear on the horsehead and both ends fastened to a
A
polished rod yoke.
4
Applies to pumping units having two vertical lines (parallel) with sockets at both ends of each line.
5
See API Spec. 4E – Specification for Drilling and Well Servicing Structures.
Care and handling 4. Braking reels: Brake the reel flanges so that the rope
does not become loose on the reel while being unwound
Field care and use of wire rope and so an even tension is applied on the rope between
A. Handling on reel the blocks; do not apply the brake on the rope itself.
1. U
se of binding or lifting chain: When handling wire rope 5. Tension on rope: Keep the line in tension to make sure
on a reel with a binding or lifting chain, wooden blocks that it is tightly wound on the drum. Insufficient tension
should always be used between the rope and the sling in during installation and after slip-and-cuts can cause im-
order to prevent damage to the wire or distortion of the proper spooling.
strands in the rope.
6. Tight spooling: The rope should be spooled under a suf-
2. U
se of bars: Bars for moving the reel should be used ficient load to ensure tight spooling.
against the reel flange and not against the rope.
7. Swivel-type stringing grip: To start stringing the rope, re-
3. S
harp objects: The reel should not be rolled over or move the old rope from the dead line anchor and fasten
dropped on any hard, sharp object in such a manner that it to the new rope with a swivel grip. The grip becomes
the rope will be bruised or nicked. tighter as the load increases. This will prevent transfer-
ring the twist from one piece of rope to the other. Care
4. Dropping: The reel should not be dropped from a truck
should be taken to see that the grip is properly applied.
or platform. This may cause damage to the rope as well
as break the reel. 8. Winding old rope: Wind all the old rope on the draw-
works drum and slip enough of the new rope into the
5. Mud, dirt, or cinders: Rolling the reel in or allowing it to
system to permit attaching to the drum. Never pull rope
stand in any medium harmful to steel such as mud, dirt,
through a loosened clamp. Keep as much back tension in
or cinders should be avoided. Planking or cribbing will be
the rope as possible because slackness can cause loops
of assistance in handling the reel as well as in protecting
and/or kinks to form.
the rope against damage.
9. Fastening new line: Fasten the new line so that it will not
6. Corrosion: To minimize the effects of corrosion on wire
run back through the blocks. Remove the swivel grip.
rope, care should be taken to store and lubricate the
Then take the old line off the drum and transfer it to a
wire rope properly. Corrosion may be particularly severe
storage reel. Attach the new line to the drawworks drum
in environments containing high concentrations of salt
and provide enough wraps so that the proper number
or acid. Corrosion reduces a wire rope’s strength, resis-
will be on the drum at the pick-up point.
tance to fatigue, and service life.
10. Number of wraps on drawworks drum: When the traveling
7. Welding and flame cutting: Never use wire rope in an
block is at the lower pick-up point, 6–9 wraps should be on
arc welding circuit. The grounding clamp can arc or the
the drum (if grooved). Plain faced drums must have a full lay-
individual wires can arc and damage the line. If using a
er of line plus 4–6 wraps on the second layer as needed.
torch near the wire rope, always protect the rope from
the flame and sparks. 11. Deadline anchor: Hold-down sheaves are the best way to
anchor the line when cut-off practices are to be employed.
B. Proper steps in stringing line Such sheaves should be of sufficient diameter to prevent
dog-legging the line and should be at least 15 times the
1. Preliminary work: Attach the traveling block to the hang
rope diameter. The line should go around the hold-down
line, or otherwise support in a vertical position. The best
sheaves in the same direction as it comes over the dead-
position is where the elevators are in pick-up position
line sheave and from the storage reel. Never anchor the
near the rotary table.
dead end of the line to a wooden or steel joist if you plan to
2. Position of the reel: Provide a permanent location for the utilize a cut-off procedure. Such practices will put severe
reel of drilling line. This should be as close as practical to dog-legs in line which will cause premature damage when
the dead-line anchor. The reel should be firmly support- this section is later moved into service. Exercise great
ed on its horizontal axis with the line unwinding from care so that the deadline clamps do not kink, flatten, or
beneath the reel drum (not from the top of the drum). otherwise crush or distort the rope.
3. Stringing of blocks: When leading the line from the reel 12.
Completing string-up: After anchoring the dead-line
to the first crown sheave use snatch blocks with large end, raise the traveling block and take off the supporting
diameter sheaves to guide the line and keep it from rub- line. The block, hook and elevators may then be lowered
bing on derrick members or other obstructions. through the V-door far enough to unreel the line on the
drum so that it can be re-reeled tightly.
13. Break-in period: Whenever possible, a new rope should clamped to the drilling line when it is necessary to do
be run under a light load for a short period after it has considerable jarring in one place.
been installed. This will help to adjust the rope to work-
perating speed: Experience has indicated that wear in-
4. O
ing conditions. It is suggested that 15 cycles with 3 joints
creases with speed; economy results from moderately
of pipe would be sufficient break-in.
increasing the load and diminishing the speed.
14. New coring or swabbing line: If a new coring or swab-
5. Maximum rope speed: Excessive speeds when blocks are
bing line is excessively wavy when first installed, two to
running up light may injure wire rope. For most drums, a
four sinker bars may be added on the first few trips to
maximum rope speed of 4,000 ft of rope travel per min
straighten the line.
for hoisting or lowering is recommended.
C. Care of wire rope in service 6. Line fatigue: Fast line fatigue is also caused by line whip
and natural vibrations, therefore, a wire line stabiliz-
1. Handling: The recommendations or handling as given
er must be employed. Reverse bending at the deadline
under A and B inclusive, should be observed at all times
anchor or too small a diameter of the deadline sheave
during the life of the rope.
(crown block) may produce a set in the line which will
2. Design factor: The design factor should be determined cause excessive wear when a cut-off procedure is utilized.
by the following formula:
7. Sheave maintenance: Vibration causes drilling line fa-
B tigue and shortens line life. Failure due to vibration is
Design Factor = most serious at the deadline (crown block) sheave. This
W
all the excess energy caused by line whip and vibration.
Wherein:
Make certain the reeving system minimizes vibration.
B = Nominal catalog strength of the wire Rope - in Considerable line whip results from fast line movement
pounds in the spooling process unless wire line stabilizers are
used. As the line goes through sheaves, its momen-
W = Fast line load - in pounds
tum tends to throw it outward, much as a car rounding
a. When a wire rope is operated close to its minimum design a curve on the highway. It is prevented from doing this,
factor, care should be taken that the rope and related equip- however, by the tension on the line. This sudden angular
ment are in good operating condition. At all times, the op- acceleration and deceleration will produce vibrations,
erating personnel should use diligent care to minimize which in a long, unsupported, fast moving, flexible line,
shock, impact, and acceleration or deceleration of loads. can result in severe whipping, if a stabilizer is not used.
b. Successful field operations indicate that the following Wobbly sheaves can produce shimmying, which will
design factors should be regarded as minimum. induce vibration in the drilling line. This may lead to
whipping. The wobble may also cause the line to receive
Table WR-5: Wire rope life varies with design abnormal wear from the sides of the sheaves, which fur-
factor. Longer rope life generally results from ther reduces rope life.
maintaining high design factors.
8. Sheave alignment: All sheaves should be in proper align-
Minimum
ment. The last sheave should line up with the center of
design factor
the hoisting drum.
Cable-tool line 3
Sand line 3 9. Sheave grooves: On all sheaves, the arc of the bottom
Rotary drilling line 3 of the groove should be smooth and concentric with the
Rotary drilling line when setting casing 2 bore or shaft of the sheave. The centerline of the groove
should be in a plane perpendicular to the axis of the bore
Pulling on stuck pipe and similar 2
infrequent operations or shaft of the sheave.
Mast raising and lowering line 2.5 Sheave grooves that have been altered by prior ropes are
bound to shorten the life of new rope. From the stand-
c. Wire rope life varies with the design factor. Therefore,
point of wire rope life, the condition and contour of sheave
longer rope life can generally be expected when relative-
grooves are of material importance. Sheave grooves should
ly high design factors are maintained.
be checked periodically with the gauge for worn sheaves
3. Application of loads: Sudden, severe stresses are in- and dimensions in Table WR-6. The sheave grooves should
jurious to wire rope and such applications should be have a diameter of not less than that of the gauge; other-
reduced to a minimum. A jerk line may be rigged and wise the reduction in rope life can be expected. Recondi
Table WR-6: Worn, new and maximum tioned sheave grooves should conform to the recommend-
groove radii for wire rope. ed radii for new and reconditioned sheaves as given in
Nominal wire Groove radius Groove radius Groove radius Table WR-6. Each operator should establish the most eco-
rope diameter minimum worn minimum new maximum nomical point at which sheaves should be re-grooved by
In. Mm In. Mm In. Mm In. Mm considering the loss in rope life which results from worn
0.250 6.5 0.128 3.25 0.134 3.40 0.138 3.51 sheaves as compared to the cost involved in re-grooving.
0.313 8.0 0.160 4.06 0.167 4.24 0.172 4.37 10. Corrugated sheaves: If rope is operated very long with
0.375 9.5 0.192 4.88 0.199 5.05 0.206 5.23 heavy loads, or if the metal is too soft, scouring or cor-
0.438 11.0 0.224 5.69 0.232 5.89 0.241 6.12 rugation of drums and sheaves will occur. When radial
0.500 13.0 0.256 6.50 0.265 6.73 0.275 6.99 pressure causes corrugation in grooves, there is a filing
0.563 14.5 0.288 7.32 0.298 7.57 0.309 7.85
action during every stop and start. When new rope is
installed after such corrugations form, its lay will not fit
0.625 16.0 0.320 8.13 0.331 8.41 0.344 8.74
the imprints left by previous ropes and very rapid wear
0.750 19.0 0.384 9.75 0.398 10.11 0.413 10.49
will take place.
0.875 22.0 0.448 11.38 0.464 11.79 0.481 12.22
1.000 26.0 0.513 13.03 0.530 13.46 0.550 13.97
Table WR-7: Tangents of fleet angles.
1.125 29.0 0.577 4.66 0.596 15.14 0.619 15.72
Ratio of “A” to “B” Fleet angle,
1.250 32.0 0.641 16.28 0.663 16.84 0.688 17.48
Tangent of “W” degrees degrees
1.375 35.0 0.705 17.91 0.729 18.52 0.756 19.20
0.009 1/2
1.500 38.0 0.769 19.53 0.795 20.19 0.825 20.96
0.013 3/4
1.625 42.0 0.833 21.16 0.861 21.87 0.894 22.71
1.750 45.0 0.897 22.78 0.928 23.57 0.963 24.46
0.017 1
1.875 48.0 0.961 24.41 0.994 25.25 1.031 26.19 0.022 1 1/4
2.000 52.0 1.025 26.04 10.060 26.92 1.100 27.94 0.026 1 1/2
2.125 54.0 1.089 27.66 1.126 28.60 1.169 29.69 0.031 1 3/4
2.250 58.0 1.153 29.29 1.193 30.30 1.238 31.45 0.035 2
2.375 60.0 1.217 30.91 1.259 31.98 1.306 33.17
2.500 64.0 1.281 32.54 1.325 33.66 1.375 34.93 When these danger signs are found, it is economical
2.625 67.0 1.345 34.16 1.391 35.33 1.444 36.68 to have the grooves turned smooth. In most cases, the
2.750 71.0 1.409 35.79 1.458 37.03 1.513 38.43 sheaves should be replaced. In replacing the sheaves,
make sure the metal is sufficiently hard to take the ex-
2.875 74.0 1.473 37.41 1.524 38.71 1.581 40.16
pected loading. Cast steel can stand only about 900 psi
3.000 77.0 1.537 39.04 1.590 40.39 1.650 41.91
of pressure, but other alloy steels will take up to 2,000
3.125 80.0 1.602 40.69 1.656 42.06 1.719 13.66
psi and will stand wear much longer. If corrugations are
3.250 83.0 1.666 42.32 1.723 43.76 1.788 15.42 occurring even with the best steel, chances are that
3.375 86.0 1.730 43.94 1.789 45.44 1.856 17.14 the rope diameter is too small for the work load or not
3.500 90.0 1.794 45.57 1.855 47.12 1.925 48.89 enough lines are being used between the blocks, or the
3.750 96.0 1.922 48.82 1.988 50.50 2.063 52.40 sheave diameter is too small.
4.000 103. 2.050 52.07 2.120 53.85 2.200 55.88 11.
Rope inspection: Equipment that is not maintained
4.250 109.0 2.178 55.32 2.253 57.23 2.338 59.39 properly not only deteriorates itself, but also aids in de-
4.500 115.0 2.306 58.57 2.385 60.58 2.475 62.87 stroying wire rope ervice life in the process. Frequent
4.750 112.0 2.434 61.82 2.518 63.96 2.613 66.37 inspection of the equipment to determine its operating
5.000 128.0 2.563 65.10 2.650 67.31 2.750 69.85
condition and replacement of worn or broken parts is
good economics when operating a rig. This is preventa-
5.250 135.0 2.691 68.35 2.783 70.69 2.888 73.36
tive maintenance versus remedial maintenance.
5.500 141.0 2.819 71.60 2.915 74.04 3.025 76.84
5.750 148.0 2.947 74.85 3.048 77.42 3.163 80.34 12. Fleet angle: When a wire rope is led from the drum onto
the last sheave, it is parallel to the sheave groove only
6.000 154.0 3.075 78.11 3.180 80.77 3.300 83.82
when at one point on the drum, usually the center. As
Minimum worn groove radius = nominal rope radius + 2 1/2% the rope departs from this point either way, an angle is
Minimum new groove radius = nominal rope radius + 6%
created which starts wear on the side of the rope. This
Maximum groove radius = nominal rope radius + 10%
angle is called the fleet angle.
The fleet angle, although necessary, should be held to Table WR-8: Clip attachment.
a minimum. Experience indicates that it should be held Courtesy the Crosby Group
to less than 1 1/2 degrees for smooth faced drums and to Rope diameter Minimum no. Amt of rope to Torque
less than 2 degrees for grooved drums. Any greater an- (in.) of clips turn back (in.) (ft-lb)
gle creates needless wear on the sides of the rope. This
1/8 2 3 1/4 4.5
holds true for either grooved or smooth drums. Poor
fleet angles cannot only cause excessive abrasive wear, 3/16 2 3 3/4 7.5
but also build-up excessive torque in a rope.
1/4 2 4 3/4 15
To check the fleet angle, Figure WR-13 can be used. The
5/16 2 5 1/4 30
fleet angle is the included angle between a line repre-
senting travel of the rope across the drum and a line 3/8 2 6 1/2 45
drawn through the center line of the lead sheave perpen-
7/16 2 7 65
dicular to the axis of the drum. Fleet angles for several
ratios of “A” & “B” are shown in Table WR-7. 12/2 3 11 1/2 65
9/16 3 12 95
5/8 3 12 95
3/4 4 18 130
7/8 4 19 225
1 5 26 225
1 1/8 6 34 225
1 1/4 7 44 360
1 3/8 7 44 360
Figure WR-13: Use in conjunction with 1 1/2 8 54 360
Table WR-8 to check fleet angle.
1 5/8 8 58 430
1 3/4 8 61 590
13. Lubrication of sheaves: In order to ensure a minimum turn-
ing effort, all sheaves should be kept properly lubricated. 2 8 71 750
14. Worn drums: Roughly worn drums may cause excessive 2 1/4 8 73 750
wear on the rope. Corrugations cause cutting of ropes.
2 1/2 9 84 750
15. Drum spooling: Heavy wear to a rotary line occurs while
2 3/4 10 100 750
spooling on the drum. Each succeeding layer causes
cross-over points and change of layer points. At the 3 10 106 1,200
cross-over points and change of layer points where the
3 1/2 12 149 1,200
rope climbs from one layer to the next, wear is usual-
ly severe. In the portion of the line that spools last and
On smooth face drums, where ropes operate on and off
when the blocks are raised and loaded, terrific cribbing
the first layer, right lay and left lay ropes are not inter-
and wear occur when the load of the drill string is sud-
changeable. The proper direction of rope lay is based on
denly lifted. In a portion of the line that lies next to the
the location of the drum attachment and whether or not
drum, which must withstand the loading of all the other
the spooling is under-wind or over-wind.
layers, crushing is considerable.
The advantage of using the proper lay rope on a smooth
16. Proper spooling: Smooth faced drums are sometimes
drum is that rotation of the rope as it spools on the drum
encountered and the biggest problem is to get the line
under tension will cause it to hug the preceding wrap. If
to spool evenly and snugly. Unless the rope is started
the improper lay is used, the rope will try to open spool.
correctly, the wraps in the first layer may tend to spread
apart. This can accelerate “cutting-in” of subsequent Care must be exercised to prevent over-run in paying out
layers and result in flattened, distorted or crushed rope rope to avoid slack rope on the drum which causes ex-
and a loss of thread lay. cess abrasion on drum and rope at take-up. Slack rope
has a tendency to slide across groove dividers which cuts An improvement in spooling methods is the controlled
the rope severely when loads are applied. Rope can be cross-over system. This is a grooving system where the
parted or severed with a quick take-up of slack. cross-over points are controlled thereby reducing wear
and vibration. Instead of being a helical shape like a coiled
Drum grooves should be checked with a sheave gauge
spring, most of the grooves are parallel to the drum flang-
for proper contour before installing a new rope.
es. Normally at the cross-over points, pitch changes rap-
17. Poor spooling: Poor spooling can sometimes be traced idly where the line is crossed from one groove to the next.
to the way the line leaves the dead end side of a smooth In controlled spooling, the change in pitch is less severe.
faced drum. If it leaves the flange at too great an angle, it In controlled pyramid spooling, wear and cutting-in is par-
maintains this angle all across the drums so that it leaves allel and there is no tendency for the line to slip over.
a big gap at the opposite flange. Thus successive layers
20. Counter-balanced pyramid spooling: Considerable vibra-
of line cross over that initial layer sharply and will tend
tion of the spooling drum and wire line at high speed results
to cut at the gaps—line crushing and shorter life result.
from the eccentricity of spooled line on the drum when
It is most important to get the first drum layer full and
one cross-over point is present. This makes the center of
tight without overcrowding so that it will support the
gravity slightly off center of the drum. Counter-balanced
succeeding layers. That is to say the first layer acts as a
spooling was developed to overcome this problem.
“grooving” for the following layers.
Counter-balanced spooling consists of 2 cross-over
One way to assist proper drum winding is by means of
points on opposite sides of the drum. This is achieved
a riser strip or wedge on the dead end side. These strips
by making the pitch at each cross-over point only half
are as high as the rope diameter and taper from 0 to
that of the single cross-over drum. The grooves are still
the diameter of the rope in width. The starter strip trav-
parallel, but those on one side of the drum are displaced
els flush around the dead end flange. It keeps the first
half a groove width from those on the other side. This
wrap straight and tends to eliminate the gap at the other
along with special pitch control bars at the flanges cause
flange. Piling up of wraps at the flange is prevented by
a line to move only 1/2 of the rope diameter at a time.
turn-back rollers or kick plates.
21. Block and hook weight: Slack line causes severe wear
18. Grooved drums: Wear due to cross-over points cannot
because of cutting and scrubbing of one layer of line
be completely avoided. It can be reduced by controlled
against the next. This condition is most likely to occur
spooling, which is provided by grooved drums.
when going back in the hole, where the traveling block
In any type of spooling there must necessarily be two is brought up fast with no load other than the weight of
crossover points with each wrap. As a lower layer pro- the block and hook to hold the line in tension. When the
ceeds in one direction across the spool, the next lay- full load of the drill string is picked up from this position,
er must proceed in the other direction. Along most the top layer from the drum may cut into the loosely
of the turn, the upper wrap rides in a groove between spooled layers. To keep this line tight and to minimize
two wraps of the lower layer. The rope must leave this the spooling damage to the line, it is important to use
groove in order to cross to the next groove and in doing a heavy traveling block and hook. See Table WR-9 for
so, crosses over a wrap of the line in the lower layer. Two theoretical weights of blocks, hooks, links and elevators.
ropes are crossed over in each drum revolution.
22. Seizing of wire rope: Before cutting, a wire rope should
With smooth faced drums, and where wire line slipping be securely seized on each side of the cut by serving
is employed, new rope is spooled onto worn rope. The with soft wire ties. For socketing, at least two addition-
worn rope has a smaller diameter and when it is wound al seizings should be placed at a distance from the end
tight, the new line will not track. The new line instead will equal to the length of the basket of the socket. For large
jump a wrap and leave a gap into which the line of the ropes, the seizing should be several inches long and se-
next layer will cut. Therefore, we suggest that slipping is curely wrapped. This is very important as it prevents the
only helping to temporarily relieve a wearing condition in rope untwisting and helps maintain equal tension in the
the drilling line between blocks. strands when the load is applied.
19. Pyramid spooling: Utilizing grooving allows an upper layer 23. Procedure for seizing wire rope:
of line to track a lower, despite the fact that the lower layers a. The seizing wire should be wound on the rope
may be worn. In this manner, cutting in is reduced. How- by hand. The coils should be kept together and
ever, it is necessary that the grooving includes filler plates considerable tension maintained on the wire.
at each end so that when the second and following layers
start, they start smoothly and leave no gap for cutting in.
b. After the seizing wire has been wound on the rope, the
ends of the wire should be twisted together by hand
in a counterclockwise direction so that the twisted
portion of the wires is near the middle of the seizing.
a thimble for turning back the rope add one additional clip.
Trav Blk E D C B A H
7 6 5 Lft Hand 8 Crn Blk 1 2 3 5 6
Trav Blk A B D E G
8 6 5 Rt Hand 8 Crn Blk 6 5 4 2 1
Trav Blk E D B A H
9 6 5 Lft Hand 8 Crn Blk 1 2 3 4 5
Trav Blk A B C D G
10 6 5 Rt Hand 8 Crn Blk 6 5 4 3 2
Trav Blk E D C B H
WIRE ROPE
11 6 5 Lft Hand 6 Crn Blk 2 3 4 5
Trav Blk B C D G
12 6 5 Rt Hand 6 Crn Blk 5 4 3 2
Trav Blk D C B H
13 6 5 Lft Hand 6 Crn Blk 1 3 4 6
Trav Blk A C E G
WR–13
14 6 5 Rt Hand 6 Crn Blk 6 4 3 1
Trav Blk E C A H
WR–14 WIRE ROPE
1. Minimum fleet angle from the drawworks drum to the 4. Determining maximum pull: The fast line during hoist-
first sheave of the crown block and from the crown block ing has a load greater than the total weight being lifted
sheaves to the traveling block sheaves. divided by the number of parts of line. The load is in-
creased by the friction of the sheave bearings and the
2. Proper balancing of crown and traveling blocks.
bending of the line around the sheaves.
3. Convenience in changing from smaller to larger number
Starting at the deadline sheave, each successive line
of lines, or from larger to smaller number of lines.
has, during hoisting, an extra load on it caused by the
4. Locating of deadline on monkey board side for “sum” of the frictional loads from all previous rotating
convenience and safety of derrickman. sheaves. Since the fast line experiences the accumula-
tion of frictional forces from all of the rotating sheaves,
5. Location of deadline anchor and its influence upon
its load is the greatest and should be used when calcu-
the maximum rated static hook load of derrick.
lating design factors.
5. Fast line loads and design factors: Fast line loads and over” points on the drum and prevent line piling up at the
design factors for various hook loads with 6, 8, 10, and drum flanges. Weight box type stabilizers are considered
12 parts of line are shown in Table WR-10. This table is far superior as far as drum spooling is concerned. Dead-
based on the Extra Improved Plow and Improved Plow line stabilizers reduce vibration in the deadline adjacent to
with independent wire rope cores. the deadline anchor and deadline sheave.
4. Draw works drum: The diameter and length of the drum 12. Size and number of drill collars: Is one of the variable fac-
is important. A drum of small diameter and length re- tors in determining the total excess weight when figuring
quires more drum wraps to raise the blocks. This leads ton-mile service per round trip.
to more layers of rope on the drum and therefore more
13. Drill stem tests: Means extra round trips over and above
“cross-over” wear points. A grooved drum increases
those necessary to change bits.
wire line service by supporting the rotary line and giv-
ing a tighter wrap. The condition of the drum clutch and 14. Coring: Also means extra round trips and more line wear.
brake greatly affects line life. If these are not properly
15. Stuck pipe: Jarring and manipulation to un-stick drill pipe
adjusted the resulting jerking and shock loads must be
causes extreme strain and wear on rotary line. No ton-mile
borne by the rotary line.
method of service wear can determine the damage here!
5. Types of string-up—6, 8, 10 or 12 lines: Governs the load Careful visual inspection should be made, and damaged
each part of the line must carry, determines the total line line removed from the system regardless of the length of
in the String-Up, and also determines the length of time cut required.
that wear points must remain in the system.
16. “Twist offs” and “fishing” jobs: Often mean several extra
6. Dead line anchor or clamp: The size, type and condition round trips to completely remove the “fish” or obstruc-
of the anchor has a direct effect on the rotary line. If it tion before normal drilling can be resumed.
is too small or otherwise distorts the line, it may form a
17. Setting casing: Length and size will vary, but it still means
“dog-leg” in the line which will set up a stress point. This
additional trips, connections, and line wear.
stress point will result in undue wear and early fatigue,
necessitating a long cut to get it out of the system.
18. Fleet angle: Taken into consideration with the proper
7. Wire line stabilizer and turn-back rollers: These two piec- wire line stabilizer can be the basis for solving many of
es of equipment help extend wire line life. The wire line the reasons for poor spooling on a rig. Therefore, the
stabilizer relieves vibration or “whip” on the “fast” line. proper fleet angle should be of paramount importance
The turn-back rollers help relieve shock at the “cross- when determining the excess laps.
Table WR-11: E indicator—drill collar weight factor, drill collar dimensions (in.)
# of Drill 5 3/4 × 2 1/4 6 × 2 1/4 6 1/4 × 2 1/4
4 1/8 × 2 4 3/4 × 2 1/4 5 3/4 × 2 13/16
Collars 6 × 2 13/16 6 1/4 × 2 13/16 6 1/2 × 2 13/16
1 1 400 600 700 800 900
2 2 700 1,300 1,500 1,700 1,900
3 3 1,100 1,900 2,200 2,500 2,800
4 4 1,500 2,600 2,900 3,300 3,800
5 5 1,900 3,200 3,700 4,200 4,700
6 6 2,200 3,800 4,000 5,000 5,600
7 7 2,600 4,500 5,100 5,800 6,600
8 8 3,000 5,100 5,900 6,700 7,500
9 9 3,400 5,700 6,600 7,500 8,500
10 10 3,700 6,400 7,300 8,300 9,400
Table WR-11 (continued): E indicator—drill collar weight factor, drill collar dimensions (in.)
# of Drill 6 × 2 1/4 6 3/4 × 2 1/4 7 1/4 × 2 13/16 7 3/4 × 3 8×3 9×3
Collars 63/4 × 2 13/16 7 × 2 13/16 7 3/4 × 2 13/16 8 × 2 13/16
1 1,000 1,200 1,300 1,500 1,700 2,200
2 2,100 2,300 2,600 3,100 3,300 4,400
3 3,100 3,500 3,900 4,600 5,000 6,500
4 4,200 4,600 5,200 6,100 6,700 8,700
5 5,200 5,800 6,500 7,700 8,300 10,900
6 6,300 7,000 7,800 9,200 10,000 13,100
7 7,300 8,100 9,100 10,700 11,700 15,300
8 8,400 9,300 10,400 12,300 13,300 17,400
9 9,400 10,400 11,700 13,800 15,000 19,600
10 10,500 11,600 13,000 15,300 16,700 21,800
Ton-mile calculations are available for any type or size of drill pipe in both mud and
air drilling. Contact a UNION WIRE ROPE representative for
A. Introduction the Indicator(s) you require.
In the early 1940s, a drilling contractor would have pur-
chased only enough rotary drilling line to string-up the B. Examples of ton-mile calculations
reeving system. Depending upon the height of the derrick
and the number of parts of line to be used, lengths would
EXAMPLE 1
vary from 650 ft to 1,750 ft. In working the line, heavy wear
would occur in a few localized sections: where the rope Round trip ton-miles
makes contact with the traveling block sheaves, and where
Situation: At a depth of 11,000 ft, a round trip is made to
the rope makes contact with the crown block sheaves when
change the bit.
the slips are pulled going in or coming out of the hole, and on
the drum where each wrap of rope crosses over the rope on Drill Pipe = 4 1/- in. (l6.6 lb/ft)
the layer below. Broken wires at these points of critical wear
Drill Collars = ten, 7-1/4 in. (119.2 lb/ft)
would result in the retirement of the entire string up, even
though the remainder of the rope was in good condition. Traveling block assembly weight (hook, elevators,
traveling block) = 27,000 lb
For these reasons, it is important that the drilling line be cut
off at the proper rate. The purpose of this Simplified Cut-Off Drilling Fluid = mud
Practice is to give the drilling contractor a method for keep-
Solution:
ing track of the amount of work done by the drilling line and
a systematic procedure for making cuts of the appropriate 1) Determine weight factor due to collars: On Table
length at the appropriate time. The objective is to obtain WR-11, locate proper drill collar number and read
maximum rope service without jeopardizing the safety of weight factor due to collars in appropriate column.
the rig operation.
Weight factor due to collars = 13,000 lb
In conjunction with the record keeping required for the cut-off
2) Determine total weight factor: Add together
procedure, daily visual inspection of the drilling line should be
Weight Factor due to Collars and weight of
made for broken wires and any other rope damage. It must be
Traveling Block assembly.
remembered that in all cases, visual inspection of the wire
rope by the drilling contractor must take precedence over Traveling Block Assembly Weight = 27,000 lb
any predetermined calculations. + Weight Factor due to Collars = 13,000 lb
Total Weight Factor = 40,000 lb
The only complicated part of a cut-off procedure is the de-
termination of how much work has been done by the wire rope. 3) Determine Ton-Miles Per Round Trip: On
Methods such as counting the number of wells drilled or keep- Table WR-10, locate depth and read round trip
ing track of days between cuts are not accurate because the ton-miles in appropriate column.
loads change with depth and with different drilling conditions.
Round Trip Ton-Miles = 337 T-M
The various operations performed (drilling, coring, fishing, set-
ting casing, etc.) subject the rope to different amounts of wear. Note: For laying down drill pipe at the end of well, figure
one-half of round trip ton-miles for drill string in question.
For an accurate record of the amount of work done by a drill-
ing line, it is necessary to calculate the weight being lifted
and the distance it is raised and lowered. In engineering
terms, work is measured in foot-pounds. On a drilling rig the
loads and distances are so great that we use “ton-miles.”
One ton-mile equals 10,560,000 ft-lb and is equivalent to
lifting 2,000 lb a distance of 5,280 ft.
Depth 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000
1,000 5 9 13 17 20 24 28 32 36 39
1,200 7 11 16 20 25 29 34 39 43 48
1,400 8 14 19 24 29 35 40 45 51 56
1,600 10 16 22 28 34 40 46 52 58 64
1,800 12 18 25 32 39 46 52 59 66 73
2,000 13 21 29 36 44 51 59 66 74 82
2,200 15 24 32 40 49 57 65 74 82 90
2,400 17 27 36 45 54 63 72 81 90 99
2,600 20 29 39 49 59 69 79 89 98 108
2,800 22 33 43 54 64 75 86 96 107 117
Weight Indicator Reading (1000's Lbs.) Weight Indicator Reading (1000's Lbs.)
Design Design
12 Lines 14 Lines 16 Lines 12 Lines 14 Lines 16 Lines
Factor Factor
411 463 511 9.9 690 778 857 5.9
416 468 516 9.8 702 791 872 5.8
420 473 521 9.7 715 805 887 5.7
424 478 527 9.6 727 819 903 5.6
429 483 532 9.5 740 834 919 5.5
433 488 538 9.4 754 850 936 5.4
438 493 544 9.3 768 866 954 5.3
443 499 549 9.2 783 882 972 5.2
448 504 556 9.1 799 899 991 5.1
453 510 562 9 815 917 1011 5
458 515 568 8.9 831 936 1032 4.9
463 521 574 8.8 848 956 1053 4.8
468 527 581 8.7 867 976 1076 4.7
474 533 588 8.6 885 997 1099 4.6
479 540 595 8.5 905 1019 1123 4.5
485 546 602 8.4 926 1043 1149 4.4
491 553 609 8.3 947 1067 1176 4.3
497 559 616 8.2 970 1092 1204 4.2
503 566 624 8.1 993 1119 1233 4.1
509 573 632 8 1018 1147 1264 4
516 581 640 7.9 1044 1176 1296 3.9
522 588 648 7.8 1072 1207 1330 3.8
529 596 657 7.7 1101 1240 1366 3.7
536 604 665 7.6 1131 1274 1404 3.6
543 612 674 7.5 1164 1311 1444 3.5
550 620 683 7.4 1198 1349 1487 3.4
*The design factors were calculated using Case A from the API 9B formula with 4% sheave loss. They do not include shock loads or acceleration stresses.
Weight Indicator Reading (1000's Lbs.) Weight Indicator Reading (1000's Lbs.)
Design Design
6 Lines 8 Lines 10 Lines 6 Lines 8 Lines 10 Lines
Factor Factor
60 77 93 9.9 101 130 156 5.9
61 78 94 9.8 103 132 159 5.8
62 79 95 9.7 105 134 162 5.7
62 80 96 9.6 107 137 165 5.6
63 81 97 9.5 109 139 168 5.5
63 82 98 9.4 111 142 171 5.4
64 82 99 9.3 113 145 174 5.3
65 83 100 9.2 115 147 177 5.2
66 84 101 9.1 117 150 181 5.1
66 85 103 9 119 153 185 5
67 86 104 8.9 122 156 188 4.9
68 87 105 8.8 124 160 192 4.8
69 88 106 8.7 127 163 196 4.7
69 89 107 8.6 130 167 201 4.6
70 90 109 8.5 133 170 205 4.5
71 91 110 8.4 136 174 210 4.4
72 92 111 8.3 139 178 215 4.3
73 93 113 8.2 142 183 220 4.2
74 95 114 8.1 146 187 225 4.1
75 96 115 8 149 192 231 4
76 97 117 7.9 153 197 237 3.9
77 98 118 7.8 157 202 243 3.8
78 100 120 7.7 161 207 249 3.7
79 101 121 7.6 166 213 256 3.6
80 102 123 7.5 171 219 264 3.5
81 104 125 7.4 176 225 271 3.4
*The design factors were calculated using Case A from the API 9B formula with 4% sheave loss. They do not include shock loads or acceleration stresses.
Weight Indicator Reading (1000's lbs.) Weight Indicator Reading (1000's Lbs.)
Design Design
10 Lines 12 Lines 14 Lines 10 Lines 12 Lines 14 Lines
Factor Factor
205 237 267 9.9 344 398 448 5.9
207 239 270 9.8 350 404 456 5.8
209 242 272 9.7 356 412 464 5.7
211 244 275 9.6 362 419 472 5.6
213 247 278 9.5 369 427 480 5.5
216 250 281 9.4 375 434 489 5.4
218 252 284 9.3 383 443 499 5.3
220 255 287 9.2 390 451 508 5.2
223 258 290 9.1 398 460 518 5.1
225 261 294 9 406 469 529 5
228 264 297 8.9 414 479 539 4.9
230 267 300 8.8 422 489 551 4.8
233 270 304 8.7 431 499 562 4.7
236 273 307 8.6 441 510 574 4.6
239 276 311 8.5 451 521 587 4.5
241 279 315 8.4 461 533 601 4.4
244 283 318 8.3 472 546 615 4.3
247 286 322 8.2 483 559 629 4.2
250 290 326 8.1 495 572 645 4.1
253 293 330 8 507 587 661 4
257 297 334 7.9 520 602 678 3.9
260 301 339 7.8 534 617 695 3.8
263 305 343 7.7 548 634 714 3.7
267 309 348 7.6 563 652 734 3.6
270 313 352 7.5 579 670 755 3.5
274 317 357 7.4 596 690 777 3.4
*The design factors were calculated using Case A from the API 9B formula with 4% sheave loss. They do not include shock loads or acceleration stresses.
Weight Indicator Reading (1000's Lbs.) Weight Indicator Reading (1000's Lbs.)
Design Design
6 Lines 6 Lines 10 Lines 6 Lines 6 Lines 10 Lines
Factor Factor
76 97 117 9.9 127 163 197 5.9
77 98 118 9.8 129 166 200 5.8
77 99 120 9.7 132 169 203 5.7
78 100 121 9.6 134 172 207 5.6
79 101 122 9.5 136 175 211 5.5
80 102 123 9.4 139 178 215 5.4
81 104 125 9.3 141 182 219 5.3
82 105 126 9.2 144 185 223 5.2
82 106 127 9.1 147 189 227 5.1
83 107 129 9 150 193 232 5
84 108 130 8.9 153 197 237 4.9
85 109 132 8.8 156 201 242 4.8
86 111 133 8.7 160 205 247 4.7
87 112 135 8.6 163 209 252 4.6
88 113 136 8.5 167 214 258 4.5
89 115 138 8.4 170 219 264 4.4
90 116 140 8.3 174 224 270 4.3
91 117 141 8.2 179 229 276 4.2
93 119 143 8.1 183 235 283 4.1
94 120 145 8 187 241 290 4
95 122 147 7.9 192 247 297 3.9
96 123 149 7.8 197 253 305 3.8
97 125 151 7.7 203 260 313 3.7
99 127 153 7.6 208 268 322 3.6
100 128 155 7.5 214 275 331 3.5
101 130 157 7.4 221 283 341 3.4
*The design factors were calculated using Case A from the API 9B formula with 4% sheave loss. They do not include shock loads or acceleration stresses.
Weight Indicator Reading (1000's Lbs.) Weight Indicator Reading (1000's Lbs.)
Design Design
10 Lines 12 Lines 14 Lines 10 Lines 12 Lines 14 Lines
Factor Factor
174 201 226 9.9 291 337 380 5.9
175 203 229 9.8 296 343 386 5.8
177 205 231 9.7 302 349 393 5.7
179 207 233 9.6 307 355 400 5.6
181 209 236 9.5 313 362 407 5.5
183 212 238 9.4 318 368 415 5.4
185 214 241 9.3 324 375 423 5.3
187 216 244 9.2 331 383 431 5.2
189 219 246 9.1 337 390 439 5.1
191 221 249 9 344 398 448 5
193 224 252 8.9 351 406 457 4.9
195 226 255 8.8 358 414 467 4.8
198 229 258 8.7 366 423 477 4.7
200 231 261 8.6 374 432 487 4.6
202 234 264 8.5 382 442 498 4.5
205 237 267 8.4 391 452 509 4.4
207 240 270 8.3 400 463 521 4.3
210 243 273 8.2 409 474 534 4.2
212 246 277 8.1 419 485 547 4.1
215 249 280 8 430 497 560 4
218 252 284 7.9 441 510 575 3.9
220 255 287 7.8 452 524 590 3.8
223 258 291 7.7 465 538 606 3.7
226 262 295 7.6 478 553 622 3.6
229 265 299 7.5 491 568 640 3.5
232 269 303 7.4 506 585 659 3.4
*The design factors were calculated using Case A from the API 9B formula with 4% sheave loss. They do not include shock loads or acceleration stresses.
Weight Indicator Reading (1000's Lbs.) Weight Indicator Reading (1000's Lbs.)
Design Design
12 Lines 14 Lines 16 Lines 12 Lines 14 Lines 16 Lines
Factor Factor
277 312 344 9.9 464 523 576 5.9
280 315 347 9.8 472 532 586 5.8
282 318 351 9.7 481 541 597 5.7
285 322 354 9.6 489 551 607 5.6
288 325 358 9.5 498 561 618 5.5
292 328 362 9.4 507 572 630 5.4
295 332 366 9.3 517 582 642 5.3
298 335 370 9.2 527 594 654 5.2
301 339 374 9.1 537 605 667 5.1
304 343 378 9 548 617 680 5
308 347 382 8.9 559 630 694 4.9
311 351 387 8.8 571 643 709 4.8
315 355 391 8.7 583 657 724 4.7
319 359 395 8.6 596 671 739 4.6
322 363 400 8.5 609 686 756 4.5
326 367 405 8.4 623 701 773 4.4
330 372 410 8.3 637 718 791 4.3
334 376 415 8.2 652 735 810 4.2
338 381 420 8.1 668 753 830 4.1
343 386 425 8 685 772 850 4
347 391 431 7.9 703 791 872 3.9
351 396 436 7.8 721 812 895 3.8
356 401 442 7.7 741 834 919 3.7
361 406 448 7.6 761 857 945 3.6
365 412 453 7.5 783 882 972 3.5
370 417 460 7.4 806 908 1000 3.4
*The design factors were calculated using Case A from the API 9B formula with 4% sheave loss. They do not include shock loads or acceleration stresses.
4 1/2 in.− 9,000 ft = − 284 T-M 4) Determine ton-miles per round trip: Locate depth
502 T-M of 12,000 ft.
Ton-miles for a round trip with
Read under 70,000 lb column
the mixed drill string = 502 T-M.
Round trip ton-miles = 520 T-M
Ton-miles for round trip with heavy-wall drill pipe The purpose of calculating the amount of work done by
the drilling line is to give an accurate method for deter-
Situation: Having drilled to 12,000 ft with the drill string
mining when and how much drilling line to slip through
shown on the left, a round trip is to be made.
and cut off. The objective of spreading the rope wear
Drilling Fluid = mud along the length of the line can be accomplished best by
Traveling Block Assembly Weight = 30,000 lb cutting lengths proportional to the ton-miles of work ac-
cumulated. All that is necessary to maintain a consistent
Solution: Instead of trying to calculate the heavy-weight
number of ton-miles per foot of rope cut.
pipe as in a mixed drill string, treat it as additional drill
collars. Use the drill collar window on the back of the For a given rope size, any particular rig can get only so
Ton-Mile Indicator which is closest to the heavy weight many ton-miles of service. The key to a successful cut-
pipe weight or do the calculations by hand. off procedure is to spread these ton-miles uniformly
by using the optimum ton-mile per foot cut goal. A rig
1) Determine weight factor due to collars: On Table
which has been able to get about 66,000 T-M out of a
WR-11 locate proper drill collar number and read
1 3/8 in.×5,000 ft drilling line may have a string-up of
weight due to collars under appropriate column.
1,700 ft for 10 parts. The remaining 3,300 ft available
2) Determine weight factor due to heavy-wall drill to be cut off should be cut at a rate of one foot for every
pipe: Figure heavyweight pipe like drill collars. 20.0 ton-miles. (66,000 T-M %3,300 ft = 20.0 T-M/ft)
On Table WR-11 locate proper heavy-weight pipe The ton-mile goal would be 20.0.
number and read weight due to heavyweight pipe
The ton-mile goal for any rig with good past perfor-
from the window with the closest drill collar weight
mance records can be calculated in the same manner. If
is 46.7 lb/ft. An accurate value for Weight Factor
the rig is new, or if the records are unavailable, a ton-mile
due to heavy-weight pipe can also be figured
goal can be selected from Table WR-20. You will note
longhand as follows (more accurate):
that only the drilling line size and the drum diameter are
Excess weight per foot needed to determine a ton-mile goal. These are by far
= 42.0−16.6 = 25.4 the most important factors that influence ton-mile ser-
vice on a drilling rig.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 in. rotary drilling line 1 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 7.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 8.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 7.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 8.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
225 32 625 89 325 41 725 91
250 36 650 93 350 44 750 94
275 39 675 96 375 47 775 97
300 43 700 100 400 50 800 100
525 75 625 78
550 79 650 81
575 82 675 84
600 86 700 88
1. Do not accumulate more than 850 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 950 ton-miles between
Cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. Cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 850 ton-miles have been accumu- 2. So long as less than 950 ton-miles have been accumu-
lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To
determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or
calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot” is constant calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
(length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 7.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 8.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 7.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 8.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 in. rotary drilling line 1 1/8 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 9.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 9.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 9.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 9.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
425 47 825 92 525 58 925 103
450 50 850 94 550 61 950 106
475 53 875 97 575 65 975 108
500 56 900 100 600 67 1000 111
725 81 825 92
750 83 850 94
775 86 875 97
800 89 900 100
1. Do not accumulate more than 1100 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 1100 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 1100 ton-miles have been accumu- 2. So long as less than 1100 ton-miles have been accumu-
lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To
determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or
calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con- calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 9.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 9.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 9.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 9.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 1/8 in. rotary drilling line 1 1/8 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 10.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 11.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷10.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 11.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
625 63 1025 103 50 5 850 77
650 65 1050 105 100 9 900 82
675 68 1075 108 150 14 950 86
700 70 1100 110 200 18 1000 91
925 93 650 59
950 95 700 64
975 98 750 68
1000 100 800 73
1. Do not accumulate more than 1200 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 1300 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 1200 ton-miles have been accumu- 2. So long as less than 1300 ton-miles have been accumu-
lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To
determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or
calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con- calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 10.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 11.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 10.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 11.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 1/8 in. rotary drilling line 1 1/4 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 12.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 13.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 12.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 13.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
100 8 900 75 200 15 1000 77
150 13 950 79 250 19 1050 81
200 17 1000 83 300 23 1100 85
250 21 1050 88 350 27 1150 88
700 58 800 62
750 63 850 65
800 67 900 69
850 71 950 73
1. Do not accumulate more than 1450 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 1550 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 1450 ton-miles have been accumu- 2. So long as less than 1550 ton-miles have been accumu-
lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To
determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or
calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con- calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 12.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 13.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 12.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 13.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 1/4 in. rotary drilling line 1 1/4 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 12.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 13.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 12.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 13.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
250 21 1050 88 350 27 1150 88
300 25 1100 92 400 31 1200 92
350 29 1150 96 450 35 1250 96
400 33 1200 100 500 38 1300 100
850 71 950 73
900 75 1000 77
950 79 1050 81
1000 83 1100 85
1. Do not accumulate more than 1450 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 1550 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 1450 ton-miles have been accumu- 2. So long as less than 1550 ton-miles have been accumu-
lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To
determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or
calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con- calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 12.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 13.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 12.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 13.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 1/4 in. rotary drilling line 1 1/4 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 14.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 15.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 14.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 15.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
450 32 1250 89 550 37 1350 90
500 36 1300 93 600 40 1400 93
550 39 1350 96 650 43 1450 97
600 43 1400 100 700 47 1500 100
1050 75 1150 77
1100 79 1200 80
1150 82 1250 83
1200 86 1300 87
1. Do not accumulate more than 1700 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 1800 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 1700 ton-miles have been accumu- 2. So long as less than 1800 ton-miles have been accumu-
lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To
determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or
calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con- calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 14.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 15.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 14.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 15.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 1/4 in. rotary drilling line 1 1/4 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 16.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 17.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 16.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 17.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
650 41 1450 91 750 44 1550 91
700 44 1500 94 800 47 1600 94
750 47 1550 97 850 50 1650 97
800 50 1600 100 900 53 1700 100
1250 78 1350 79
1300 81 1400 82
1350 84 1450 85
1400 88 1500 88
1. Do not accumulate more than 1900 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 2050 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 1900 ton-miles have been accumu- 2. So long as less than 2050 ton-miles have been accumu-
lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To
determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or
calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con- calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 16.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 17.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 16.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 17.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 1/4 in. rotary drilling line 1 3/8 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 18.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 17.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 18.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 17.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
850 47 1650 92 850 50 1650 97
900 50 1700 94 900 53 1700 100
950 53 1750 97 950 56 1750 103
1000 56 1800 100 1000 59 1800 106
1450 81 1450 85
1500 83 1500 88
1550 86 1550 91
1600 89 1600 94
1. Do not accumulate more than 2150 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 2050 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 2150 ton-miles have been accumu- 2. So long as less than 2050 ton-miles have been accumu-
lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To
determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or
calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is const calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 17.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 18.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should 3. This program is based upon a goal of 17.0. Any attempt to
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
cuts) has been used following this particular program not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 3/8 in. rotary drilling line 1 3/8 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 18.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 19.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 18.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 19.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
1050 58 1850 103 1150 61 1950 103
1100 61 1900 106 1200 63 2000 105
1150 64 1950 108 1250 66 2050 108
1200 67 2000 111 1300 68 2100 111
1450 81 1550 82
1500 83 1600 84
1550 86 1650 87
1600 89 1700 89
1650 92 1750 92
1700 94 1800 95
1750 97 1850 97
1800 100 1900 100
1. Do not accumulate more than 2150 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 2300 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 2150 ton-miles have been accumu- 2. So long as less than 2300 ton-miles have been accumu-
lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To
determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or
calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con- calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 18.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 19.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 18.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 19.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 1/4 in. rotary drilling line 1 3/8 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 18.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 21.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 18.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 21.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
1250 63 2050 103 1350 64 2150 102
1300 65 2100 105 1400 67 2200 105
1350 68 2150 108 1450 69 2250 107
1400 70 2200 110 1500 71 2300 110
1850 93 1950 93
1900 95 2000 95
1950 98 2050 98
2000 100 2100 100
1. Do not accumulate more than 2400 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 2550 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 2400 ton-miles have been accu- 2. So long as less than 2550 ton-miles have been accumu-
mu- lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To
To determine the length to cut, refer to the above table determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or
or calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con- calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 20.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 21.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 20.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 21.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 3/8 in. rotary drilling line 1 3/8 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 22.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 23.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 22.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 23.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
100 5 1700 77 100 4 1700 74
200 9 1800 81 200 9 1800 78
300 14 1900 86 300 13 1900 83
400 18 2000 91 400 17 2000 87
1300 59 1300 56
1400 64 1400 61
1500 68 1500 65
1600 72 1600 70
1. Do not accumulate more than 2600 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 2800 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 2600 ton-miles have been accu- 2. So long as less than 2800 ton-miles have been accu-
mu- lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. mu- lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient.
To determine the length to cut, refer to the above table To determine the length to cut, refer to the above table
or calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con- or calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 22.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 23.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 22.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 23.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 3/8 in. rotary drilling line 1 1/2 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 24.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 23.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 24.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 23.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
100 4 1700 71 300 13 1900 83
200 8 1800 75 400 17 2000 87
300 13 1900 79 500 22 2100 91
400 17 2000 83 600 26 2200 96
1. Do not accumulate more than 2900 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 2800 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 2900 ton-miles have been accumu 2. So long as less than 2800 ton-miles have been accu-
lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To de- mulated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient.
termine the length to cut, refer to the above table or cal- To determine the length to cut, refer to the above table
culate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is constant or calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
(length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 24.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 23.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 24.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 23.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 1/2 in. rotary drilling line 1 3/8 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 24.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 25.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 24.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 25.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
500 21 2100 88 600 24 2200 88
600 25 2200 92 700 28 2300 92
700 29 2300 96 800 32 2400 96
800 33 2400 100 900 36 2500 100
1700 71 1800 72
1800 75 1900 76
1900 79 2000 80
2000 83 2100 84
1. Do not accumulate more than 2900 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 3000 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 2900 ton-miles have been accu- 2. So long as less than 3000 ton-miles have been accu-
mu- lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. mulated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient.
To determine the length to cut, refer to the above table To determine the length to cut, refer to the above table
or calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con- or calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 24.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 25.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 24.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 25.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 3/8 in. rotary drilling line 1 1/2 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 26.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 27.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 26.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 27.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
700 27 2300 89 800 30 2400 89
800 31 2400 92 900 33 2500 93
900 35 2500 96 1000 37 2600 96
1000 39 2600 100 1100 41 2700 100
1900 73 2000 74
2000 77 2100 78
2100 81 2200 82
2200 85 2300 85
1. Do not accumulate more than 3100 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 3200 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 3100 ton-miles have been accumu- 2. So long as less than 3200 ton-miles have been accumu-
lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To
determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or
calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con- calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 26.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 27.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 26.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 27.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 1/2 in. rotary drilling line 1 5/8 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 28.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 28.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 28.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 28.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
900 32 2500 89 900 32 2500 89
1000 36 2600 93 1000 36 2600 93
1100 39 2700 96 1100 39 2700 96
1200 43 2800 100 1200 43 2800 100
2100 75 2100 75
2200 79 2200 79
2300 82 2300 82
2400 86 2400 86
1. Do not accumulate more than 3400 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 3400 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 3400 ton-miles have been accu- 2. So long as less than 3400 ton-miles have been accu-
mu- lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. mu- lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient.
To determine the length to cut, refer to the above table To determine the length to cut, refer to the above table
or calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con- or calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 28.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 28.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 28.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 28.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for UNION WIRE ROPE cut-off program for
1 3/4 in. rotary drilling line 1 3/4 in. rotary drilling line
Goal is 31.0 ton-miles per foot cut Goal is 32.0 ton-miles per foot cut
Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 31.0 Length to cut = ton-miles since last cut ÷ 32.0
T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length T-M Since Length
Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut Last Cut To Cut
900 29 2500 81 900 28 2500 78
1000 32 2600 84 1000 31 2600 81
1100 35 2700 87 1100 34 2700 84
1200 39 2800 90 1200 38 2800 88
1. Do not accumulate more than 3700 ton-miles between 1. Do not accumulate more than 3800 ton-miles between
cuts—even on the first cut of a new line. cuts—even on the first cut of a new line.
2. So long as less than 3700 ton-miles have been accumu- 2. So long as less than 3800 ton-miles have been accu-
lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To mu- lated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient.
determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or To determine the length to cut, refer to the above table
calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con- or calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is con-
stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 31.0). stant (length to cut = T-M since last cut ÷ 32.0).
3. This program is based upon a goal of 31.0. Any attempt to 3. This program is based upon a goal of 32.0. Any attempt to
improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should improve rope service by increasing the ton-mile goal should
not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long
cuts) has been used following this particular program. cuts) has been used following this particular program.
reeving system and consequently any section of rope is in A 12-part string-up would be required for setting casing
the system longer than necessary before it is finally cut off. having a total buoyed weight of more than 480,000 lb.
Constant Weight
T.B.A. Wt. = 40,000 lb
+ Drill Collar Excess Wt. = 92,871 lb
(30−138 lb/ft) = 132,871 lb. (Total)
8-Part
String-Up
10-Part
String-Up
Figure WR-18
Table WR-24
Design factors (example only for this size and grade line)
1 3/8 in. improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
Table WR-25
Design factors
1 3/8 in. improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
Table WR-26
Design factors
1 in. extra improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
Table WR-27
Design factors
1 1/8 in. improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
Table WR-28
Design factors
1 1/8 in extra improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
100 128 154 177 6.9 238 305 366 422 2.9
102 130 156 180 6.8 247 316 379 437 2.8
103 132 159 183 6.7 256 328 393 453 2.7
105 134 161 185 6.6 266 340 408 471 2.6
106 136 163 188 6.5 276 354 425 490 2.5
108 138 166 191 6.4 288 369 443 510 2.4
110 140 169 194 6.3 300 385 462 532 2.3
111 143 171 197 6.2 314 402 483 556 2.2
113 145 174 201 6.1 329 421 506 583 2.1
115 147 177 204 6.0 345 442 531 612 2.0
Table WR-29
Design factors
1 1/4 in. improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
107 137 164 189 6.9 254 326 391 451 2.9
108 139 167 192 6.8 263 337 405 467 2.8
110 141 169 195 6.7 273 350 420 484 2.7
112 143 172 198 6.6 284 363 436 503 2.6
113 145 174 201 6.5 295 378 454 523 2.5
115 148 177 204 6.4 308 394 472 545 2.4
117 150 180 207 6.3 321 411 493 568 2.3
119 152 183 211 6.2 335 429 515 594 2.2
121 155 186 214 6.1 351 450 540 622 2.1
123 157 189 218 6.0 369 472 567 653 2.0
Table WR-30
Design factors
1 1/4 in. extra improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
Table WR-31
Design factors
1 3/8 in. improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
128 153 177 198 8.9 232 278 321 360 4.9
129 155 179 200 8.8 237 284 328 367 4.8
131 157 181 202 8.7 242 290 335 375 4.7
132 159 183 205 8.6 247 297 342 383 4.6
134 161 185 207 8.5 253 303 349 391 4.5
135 162 187 210 8.4 258 310 357 400 4.4
137 164 189 212 8.3 264 317 366 410 4.3
139 166 192 215 8.2 271 325 374 419 4.2
140 168 194 217 8.1 277 333 384 430 4.1
142 171 197 220 8.0 284 341 393 440 4.0
144 173 199 223 7.9 291 350 403 452 3.9
146 175 202 226 7.8 299 359 414 464 3.8
148 177 204 229 7.7 307 369 425 476 3.7
150 180 207 232 7.6 316 379 437 489 3.6
152 182 210 235 7.5 325 390 449 503 3.5
154 184 213 238 7.4 334 401 463 518 3.4
156 187 215 241 7.3 344 413 477 534 3.3
158 189 218 245 7.2 355 426 491 551 3.2
160 192 221 248 7.1 367 440 507 568 3.1
162 195 225 252 7.0 379 455 524 587 3.0
165 198 228 255 6.9 392 470 542 607 2.9
167 201 231 259 6.8 406 487 562 629 2.8
170 204 235 263 6.7 421 505 582 652 2.7
172 207 238 267 6.6 437 525 605 678 2.6
175 210 242 271 6.5 455 546 629 705 2.5
178 213 246 275 6.4 474 568 655 734 2.4
180 217 250 280 6.3 494 593 684 766 2.3
183 220 254 284 6.2 517 620 715 801 2.2
186 224 258 289 6.1 541 650 749 839 2.1
189 227 262 294 6.0 568 682 786 881 2.0
Table WR-32
Design factors
1 3/8 in. extra improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
147 176 203 228 8.9 267 320 369 413 4.9
149 178 205 230 8.8 272 327 377 422 4.8
150 180 208 233 8.7 278 334 385 431 4.7
152 182 210 236 8.6 284 341 393 440 4.6
154 185 213 238 8.5 290 349 402 450 4.5
156 187 215 241 8.4 297 357 411 460 4.4
157 189 218 244 8.3 304 365 420 471 4.3
159 191 220 247 8.2 311 373 430 482 4.2
161 194 223 250 8.1 319 383 441 494 4.1
163 196 226 253 8.0 327 392 452 506 4.0
165 199 229 256 7.9 335 402 464 519 3.9
168 201 232 260 7.8 344 413 476 533 3.8
170 204 235 263 7.7 353 424 489 547 3.7
172 206 238 266 7.6 363 436 502 563 3.6
174 209 241 270 7.5 373 448 517 579 3.5
177 212 244 274 7.4 384 461 532 596 3.4
179 215 248 277 7.3 396 475 548 614 3.3
182 218 251 281 7.2 408 490 565 633 3.2
184 221 255 285 7.1 422 506 583 653 3.1
187 224 258 289 7.0 436 523 603 675 3.0
189 227 262 294 6.9 451 541 623 698 2.9
192 231 266 298 6.8 467 560 646 723 2.8
195 234 270 302 6.7 484 581 670 750 2.7
198 238 274 307 6.6 503 603 695 779 2.6
201 241 278 312 6.5 523 627 723 810 2.5
204 245 282 316 6.4 545 654 753 844 2.4
207 249 287 321 6.3 568 682 786 881 2.3
211 253 292 327 6.2 594 713 822 921 2.2
214 257 296 332 6.1 622 747 861 964 2.1
218 261 301 338 6.0 654 784 904 1013 2.0
Table WR-33
Design factors
1 1/2 in. improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
Table WR-34
Design factors
1 1/2 in. improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
Table WR-35
Design factors
1 1/2 in. extra improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
Table WR-36
Design factors
1 1/2 in. extra improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
209 241 270 297 8.9 380 438 491 539 4.9
212 244 273 300 8.8 388 447 501 550 4.8
214 247 276 303 8.7 396 457 512 561 4.7
217 250 280 307 8.6 405 467 523 574 4.6
219 253 283 310 8.5 414 477 534 586 4.5
222 256 286 314 8.4 423 488 547 600 4.4
224 259 290 318 8.3 433 499 559 614 4.3
227 262 293 322 8.2 444 511 573 628 4.2
230 265 297 326 8.1 454 524 587 644 4.1
233 268 301 330 8.0 466 537 601 660 4.0
236 272 304 334 7.9 478 550 617 677 3.9
239 275 308 338 7.8 490 565 633 694 3.8
242 279 312 343 7.7 503 580 650 713 3.7
245 282 316 347 7.6 517 596 668 733 3.6
248 286 321 352 7.5 532 613 687 754 3.5
252 290 325 357 7.4 548 631 707 776 3.4
255 294 329 361 7.3 564 651 729 800 3.3
259 298 334 367 7.2 582 671 752 825 3.2
262 302 339 372 7.1 601 693 776 851 3.1
266 307 344 377 7.0 621 716 802 880 3.0
270 311 349 382 6.9 642 740 829 910 2.9
274 316 354 388 6.8 665 767 859 942 2.8
278 320 359 394 6.7 690 795 891 977 2.7
282 325 364 400 6.6 716 826 925 1015 2.6
287 330 370 406 6.5 745 859 962 1056 2.5
291 335 376 412 6.4 776 895 1002 1100 2.4
296 341 382 419 6.3 810 933 1046 1147 2.3
300 346 388 426 6.2 847 976 1093 1199 2.2
305 352 394 433 6.1 887 1022 1145 1257 2.1
310 358 401 440 6.0 931 1073 1203 1319 2.0
Table WR-37
Design factors
1 5/8 in. improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
Table WR-38
Design factors
1 5/8 in. improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
Table WR-39
Design Factors
1 5/8 in. improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
Table WR-40
Design Factors
1 5/8 in. extra improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
242 279 313 343 8.9 440 507 568 624 4.9
245 282 316 347 8.8 449 518 580 637 4.8
248 286 320 351 8.7 459 529 593 650 4.7
251 289 324 355 8.6 469 540 605 664 4.6
254 292 328 359 8.5 479 552 619 679 4.5
257 296 332 364 8.4 490 565 633 694 4.4
260 300 336 368 8.3 502 578 648 711 4.3
263 303 340 373 8.2 514 592 663 728 4.2
266 307 344 377 8.1 526 606 679 745 4.1
270 311 348 382 8.0 539 621 696 764 4.0
273 315 353 387 7.9 553 637 714 783 3.9
277 319 357 392 7.8 568 654 733 804 3.8
280 323 362 397 7.7 583 672 753 826 3.7
284 327 366 402 7.6 599 691 774 849 3.6
288 331 371 407 7.5 616 710 796 873 3.5
291 336 376 413 7.4 634 731 819 899 3.4
295 341 381 419 7.3 654 753 844 926 3.3
300 345 387 424 7.2 674 777 870 955 3.2
304 350 392 430 7.1 696 802 898 986 3.1
308 355 398 437 7.0 719 829 928 1019 3.0
313 360 404 443 6.9 744 857 960 1054 2.9
317 366 410 449 6.8 770 888 995 1091 2.8
322 371 416 456 6.7 799 921 1031 1132 2.7
327 377 422 463 6.6 830 956 1071 1175 2.6
332 382 428 470 6.5 863 994 1114 1222 2.5
337 388 435 477 6.4 899 1036 1160 1273 2.4
342 395 442 485 6.3 938 1081 1211 1329 2.3
348 401 449 493 6.2 980 1130 1266 1389 2.2
354 408 457 501 6.1 1027 1184 1326 1455 2.1
359 414 464 509 6.0 1078 1243 1392 1528 2.0
TableWR-41
Design factors
1 3/4 in. extra improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
363 416 467 516 8.9 660 756 848 936 4.9
367 421 472 521 8.8 674 772 867 956 4.8
372 426 478 527 8.7 688 788 884 976 4.7
376 431 483 534 8.6 703 806 904 997 4.6
381 436 489 540 8.5 719 823 924 1020 4.5
385 441 495 546 8.4 735 842 945 1043 4.4
390 446 501 553 8.3 752 862 967 1067 4.3
395 452 507 560 8.2 770 882 990 1092 4.2
399 457 513 566 8.1 789 904 1014 1119 4.1
404 463 520 574 8.0 809 926 1039 1147 4.0
409 469 526 581 7.9 829 950 1066 1176 3.9
415 475 533 588 7.8 851 975 1094 1207 3.8
420 481 540 596 7.7 874 1002 1123 1240 3.7
426 488 547 604 7.6 899 1029 1155 1274 3.6
431 494 554 612 7.5 924 1059 1188 1311 3.5
437 501 562 620 7.4 951 1090 1223 1349 3.4
443 508 569 629 7.3 980 1123 1260 1390 3.3
449 515 577 637 7.2 1011 1158 1299 1434 3.2
456 522 585 646 7.1 1044 1195 1341 1480 3.1
462 529 594 655 7.0 1078 1235 1386 1529 3.0
469 537 602 665 6.9 1116 1278 1433 1582 2.9
476 545 611 675 6.8 1155 1323 1485 1639 2.8
483 553 620 685 6.7 1198 1372 1540 1699 2.7
490 561 630 695 6.6 1244 1425 1599 1765 2.6
498 570 639 706 6.5 1294 1482 1663 1835 2.5
505 579 649 717 6.4 1348 1544 1732 1912 2.4
513 588 660 728 6.3 1407 1611 1807 1995 2.3
522 598 670 740 6.2 1470 1684 1889 2086 2.2
530 607 681 752 6.1 1540 1765 1979 2185 2.1
539 618 693 765 6.0 1618 1853 2078 2294 2.0
Table WR-42
Design factors
2 in. extra improved plow rotary line
UNION WIRE ROPE
400 470 539 604 8.9 726 854 979 1098 4.9
404 476 545 611 8.8 741 872 999 1121 4.8
409 481 551 618 8.7 757 891 1020 1145 4.7
413 487 557 625 8.6 773 910 1043 1169 4.6
418 493 564 633 8.5 790 930 1066 1195 4.5
423 498 571 640 8.4 808 951 1090 1223 4.4
428 504 578 648 8.3 827 974 1115 1251 4.3
434 511 585 656 8.2 847 997 1142 1281 4.2
439 517 592 664 8.1 867 1021 1170 1312 4.1
445 523 599 672 8.0 889 1047 1199 1345 4.0
450 530 607 681 7.9 912 1073 1230 1379 3.9
456 537 615 690 7.8 936 1102 1262 1416 3.8
462 544 623 699 7.7 961 1131 1296 1454 3.7
468 551 631 708 7.6 988 1163 1332 1494 3.6
474 558 639 717 7.5 1016 1196 1370 1537 3.5
481 566 648 727 7.4 1046 1231 1410 1582 3.4
487 573 657 737 7.3 1078 1269 1453 1630 3.3
494 581 666 747 7.2 1111 1308 1499 1681 3.2
501 590 675 757 7.1 1147 1350 1547 1735 3.1
508 598 685 768 7.0 1185 1396 1599 1793 3.0
515 607 695 780 6.9 1226 1444 1654 1855 2.9
523 616 705 791 6.8 1270 1495 1713 1921 2.8
531 625 716 803 6.7 1317 1551 1776 1992 2.7
539 634 727 815 6.6 1368 1610 1844 2069 2.6
547 644 738 828 6.5 1422 1675 1918 2152 2.5
556 654 749 841 6.4 1482 1744 1998 2241 2.4
564 665 761 854 6.3 1546 1820 2085 2339 2.3
574 675 773 868 6.2 1616 1903 2180 2445 2.2
583 686 786 882 6.1 1693 1994 2284 2562 2.1
593 698 799 897 6.0 1778 2093 2398 2690 2.0
* These values were calculated using 2% sheave loss and the API Fomula. They do not include shock loads or acceleration stresses.
Table WR-43
Ton-miles for jarring down
(Bumper jars)
Chart is for one pull*
(Pull is from zero load to pipe weight plus 5 ft stroke and back)
6,000 0.078 0.095 0.107 0.116 0.111 0.123 0.136 0.134 0.146 0.157 0.162
7,000 0.096 0.118 0.135 0.147 0.140 0.156 0.173 0.172 0.187 0.203 0.210
8,000 0.117 0.147 0.169 0.184 0.175 0.197 0.219 0.218 0.238 0.259 0.268
9,000 0.143 0.181 0.210 0.229 0.218 0.247 0.275 0.273 0.300 0.326 0.339
10,000 0.172 0.221 0.258 0.283 0.268 0.305 0.341 0.339 0.373 0.407 0.424
11,000 0.206 0.267 0.315 0.345 0.327 0.374 0.419 0.416 0.459 0.502 0.523
12,000 0.245 0.321 0.380 0.417 0.395 0.454 0.509 0.505 0.560 0.612 0.639
13,000 0.289 0.382 0.455 0.501 0.473 0.545 0.612 0.609 0.675 0.739 0.773
14,000 0.339 0.452 0.540 0.595 0.561 0.649 0.731 0.726 0.807 0.885 0.926
15,000 0.395 0.530 0.635 0.702 0.662 0.767 0.864 0.859 0.956 1.050 1.100
16,000 0.458 0.618 0.743 0.822 0.774 0.900 1.020 1.010 1.120 1.240 1.290
17,000 0.526 0.715 0.863 0.956 0.898 1.050 1.180 1.180 1.310 1.440 1.510
18,000 0.602 0.823 0.995 1.100 1.040 1.210 1.370 1.360 1.520 1.670 1.760
19,000 0.685 0.941 1.140 1.270 1.190 1.390 1.580 1.570 1.750 1.930 2.030
20,000 0.776 1.070 1.300 1.450 1.360 1.590 1.800 1.790 2.010 2.210 2.320
21,000 0.875 1.210 1.480 1.640 1.540 1.810 2.050 2.040 2.290 2.520 2.650
22,000 0.982 1.370 1.670 1.860 1.750 2.050 2.330 2.310 2.590 2.860 3.010
23,000 1.100 1.540 1.880 2.090 1.960 2.310 2.620 2.610 2.920 3.230 3.390
24,000 1.220 1.720 2.100 2.350 2.200 2.590 2.940 2.920 3.280 3.630 3.810
25,000 1.360 1.910 2.350 2.620 2.450 2.890 3.290 3.270 3.670 4.060 4.270
26,000 1.500 2.120 2.610 2.910 2.730 3.220 3.660 3.640 4.090 4.520 4.760
27,000 1.660 2.350 2.890 3.230 3.020 3.570 4.060 4.040 4.540 5.020 5.290
28,000 1.820 2.590 3.190 3.570 3.340 3.940 4.500 4.470 5.030 5.560 5.850
29,000 2.000 2.840 3.510 3.930 3.680 4.340 4.960 4.930 5.540 6.130 6.460
30,000 2.180 3.120 3.850 4.310 4.040 4.770 5.450 5.410 6.100 6.750 7.110
"* Example 1: If approximately 25 pulls are made on 12,000 ft of clear 5 in. (19.5 lb) pipe, the ton-miles accumulated are:
0.505×25 = 13 ton-miles.
"* Example 2: If approximately 100 pulls are made on 20,000 ft of clear 4 1/2 in. (16.6 lb) pipe, the ton-miles accumulated are:
1.59×100 = 159 ton-miles.
Table WR-44
Ton-miles for jarring down
(Bumper jars)
Chart is for one pull*
(Pull is from 20,000 lb under pipe weight to 70,000 lb over pipe weight and back) plus 5 ft stroke and back)
6,000 0.298 0.234 0.209 0.192 0.205 0.195 0.176 0.181 0.176 0.168 0.173
7,000 0.370 0.295 0.267 0.247 0.262 0.251 0.228 0.234 0.229 0.219 0.226
8,000 0.448 0.363 0.331 0.307 0.325 0.313 0.286 0.293 0.288 0.277 0.285
9,000 0.533 0.437 0.401 0.374 0.395 0.382 0.350 0.359 0.353 0.341 0.351
10,000 0.623 0.518 0.478 0.447 0.471 0.457 0.421 0.431 0.425 0.411 0.424
11,000 0.721 0.604 0.561 0.526 0.554 0.539 0.498 0.510 0.504 0.488 0.504
12,000 0.824 0.698 0.650 0.612 0.642 0.628 0.581 0.595 0.589 0.571 0.590
13,000 0.934 0.797 0.746 0.704 0.738 0.723 0.671 0.686 0.681 0.661 0.683
14,000 1.050 0.903 0.848 0.802 0.840 0.825 0.767 0.784 0.780 0.758 0.783
15,000 1.170 1.020 0.957 0.906 0.948 0.933 0.870 0.889 0.885 0.861 0.889
16,000 1.300 1.130 1.070 1.020 1.060 1.050 0.978 1.000 0.996 0.970 1.000
17,000 1.440 1.260 1.190 1.130 1.180 1.170 1.090 1.120 1.110 1.090 1.120
18,000 1.580 1.390 1.320 1.260 1.310 1.300 1.220 1.240 1.240 1.210 1.250
19,000 1.720 1.530 1.460 1.390 1.450 1.430 1.340 1.370 1.370 1.340 1.380
20,000 1.880 1.670 1.600 1.520 1.590 1.570 1.480 1.510 1.510 1.470 1.520
21,000 2.040 1.820 1.740 1.670 1.730 1.720 1.620 1.650 1.650 1.620 1.670
22,000 2.210 1.980 1.900 1.810 1.890 1.880 1.770 1.800 1.800 1.760 1.820
23,000 2.380 2.140 2.060 1.970 2.050 2.040 1.920 1.960 1.960 1.920 1.980
24,000 2.560 2.310 2.230 2.130 2.210 2.200 2.080 2.120 2.120 2.080 2.150
25,000 2.740 2.490 2.400 2.300 2.390 2.380 2.240 2.290 2.300 2.250 2.330
26,000 2.940 2.670 2.580 2.470 2.560 2.560 2.420 2.470 2.470 2.420 2.510
27,000 3.130 2.860 2.760 2.650 2.750 2.750 2.600 2.650 2.660 2.600 2.690
28,000 3.340 3.060 2.960 2.840 2.940 2.940 2.780 2.840 2.850 2.790 2.890
29,000 3.550 3.260 3.150 3.030 3.140 3.140 2.970 3.030 3.040 2.990 3.090
30,000 3.770 3.470 3.360 3.230 3.350 3.350 3.170 3.320 3.250 3.190 3.300
* Example 1: If approximately 25 pulls are made on 12,000 ft of clear 5 in. (19.5 lb) pipe, the ton-miles accumulated are:
0.595×25 = 15 ton-miles.
* Example 2: If approximately 100 pulls are made on 20,000 ft of clear 4 1/2 in. (16.6 lb) pipe, the ton-miles accumulated are:
1.57×100 = 157 ton-miles.
Table WR-45
Ton-miles for working casing
(Based on 30 travel)
Chart is for one pull*
(Pull is from 20,000 lb under pipe weight to 70,000 lb over pipe weight and back)
Table WR-46
Approximate traveling block assembly weights
(hook, block, elevator, and links)
Weight-Pounds Capacity-Tons
6,300 100
7,400 150
12,900 250
16,700 350
26,500 500
34,000 650
46,000 750
Table WR-47
Drill Collar Weights Pounds Per Foot
Chart is for one pull*
(Pull is from zero load to pipe weight pluse 5 ft stroke and back)
Bore of collar
Collar
1 1/2 1 3/4 2 2 1/4 2 1/2 2 13/16 3 3 1/4 3 1/2 3 3/4 4
O.D.
3 3/8 24.4 22.2
3 1/2 26.7 24.5
3 3/4 31.5 29.3
3 7/8 34 31.9 29.4 26.5
4 36.7 34.5 32 29.2
4 1/8 39.4 37.2 34.7 31.9
4 1/4 42.2 40 37.5 34.7
4 1/2 48 45.8 43.3 40.5
4 3/4 60.1 52 49.5 46.7 43.5
5 54.2 58.5 55.9 53.1 49.9
5 1/4 67.5 65.3 62.8 59.9 56.8 53.3
5 1/2 74.7 72.5 69.9 67.2 63.9 60.5 56.7
5 3/4 82.1 79.9 77.5 74.6 71.5 67.9 64.1
6 89.9 87.8 85.3 82.5 79.3 75.8 71.9 67.8 63.3
6 1/4 98.1 95.9 93.5 90.6 87.5 83.9 80.1 75.9 71.5
6 1/2 106.6 104.5 101.9 99.1 95.9 92.5 88.6 84.5 79.9
6 3/4 115.5 113.3 110.8 107.9 104.8 101.3 97.5 93.3 88.8
7 124.6 122.5 119.9 117.1 113.9 110.5 106.6 102.5 97.9 93.1 87.9
7 1/4 134.1 131.9 129.5 126.6 123.5 119.9 116.1 111.9 107.5 102.6 97.5
7 1/2 143.9 141.7 139.3 136.5 133.3 129.8 125.9 121.8 117.3 112.5 107.3
7 3/4 154.1 151.9 149.5 146.6 143.5 139.9 136.1 131.9 127.5 122.6 117.5
8 164.6 162.5 159.9 157.1 153.9 150.5 146.6 142.5 137.9 133.1 127.9
8 1/4 175.4 173.3 170.8 167.9 164.8 161.3 157.5 153.3 148.8 143.9 138.8
8 1/2 186.6 184.4 181.9 179.1 175.9 168.6 172.5 164.5 159.9 155.1 149.9
8 3/4 198.1 195.9 193.9 190.6 187.4 183.9 180.1 175.9 171.4 166.6 161.5
9 207.8 205.3 202.4 199.3 195.8 191.9 187.8 183.3 178.5 173.3
9 1/2 232.4 229.9 227.1 223.9 220.4 216.6 212.4 207.9 203.1 197.9
10 255.9 253.1 249.9 246.4 242.6 238.4 233.9 229.1 223.9
10 1/2 283.3 280.4 277.3 273.8 269.9 265.8 261.3 256.4 251.3
11 305.9 302.4 298.6 294.4 289.9 285.1 279.9
Appendix
Ton-mile formulas
The locking assembly must facilitate several requirements
in order for the remainder of the assembly to effectively drill 1. Drill ahead length of the kelly.
with casing. The assembly must allow: 2. Pull up length of the kelly.
3. Ream ahead length of the kelly.
The ton-mile tables in this manual are designated to include
4. Pull up length of the kelly to add single or double.
the most common operating situations; however, they are
5. Put kelly in rat hole.
not exhaustive. Variations in pipe weight (drill pipe, tubing,
etc.), excess weight, and fluid weight (mud, gas, air, foam, 6. Pick up single or double.
etc.) make an exhaustive set of ton-mile tables impractical 7. Lower drill stem in hole.
for this manual. Where the ton-mile tables can not be used, 8. Pick up kelly.
the following ton-mile formula (from which the tables are
Analysis of the cycle of operations shows that for any one
derived) may be applied.
hole, the sum of all operations 1 and 2 is equal to one round
trip; the sum of all operations 3 and 4 is equal to another round
A. Round-trip operations
trip; the sum of all operations 7 is equal to one-half a round
Most of the work done by a drilling line is that performed trip; and the sum of all operations 5, 6, and 8 may, and in this
in making round trips (or half-trips) involving running the case does, equal another one-half round trip, thereby making
string of drill pipe into the hole and pulling the string out the work of drilling the hole equivalent to three round trips
of the hole. The amount of work performed per round to bottom, which relation- ship can be expressed as follows:
trip can be determined by use of the following formula: Td = 3 (T2−T 1 ) (4.2)
D (Ls + D) Wm + D (M + 1/2 C) (4.1)
Tr = Wherein:
10,560,000 2,640,000
Td = ton-miles drilling
Wherein:
T 1 = ton-miles for one round trip at depth D1 (depth
Tr = ton-miles (weight in tons times distance
where drilling started after going in hole, ft)
moved
in miles) T2 = ton-miles for one round trip at depth D2 (depth
where drilling stopped before coming out of hole,
D = depth of hole, ft
ft)
Ls = length of drill-pipe stand, ft
If operations 3 and 4 are omitted, then formula 4.2
N = number of stands of drill-pipe becomes:
M = total weight of traveling block-elevator If a top-drive is used, then formula 4.2 becomes
assembly, lb
Td = (T2−T 1 )
C = effective weight of drill-collar assembly minus
If reaming is to be done while using a top drive, then
the effective weight of the same length of
formula
drill-pipe, lb
4.2 becomes
1. Core ahead length of core barrel. Since no excess weight for drill collars need be considered,
2. Pull up length of kelly. this formula becomes:
3. Put kelly in rat hole.
4. Pick up single.
5. Lower drill stem in hole. D (Lcs + D) (Wcm) DM
Ts = + × 1/2 (4.4)
6. Pick up kelly.
10,560,000 2,640,000
Analysis of the cycle of operation shows that for any one
hole the sum of all operations 1 and 2 is equal to one Wherein:
round trip; the sum of all operations 5 is equal to one-
Ts = ton-miles setting casing, ft
half a round trip; and the sum of all operations 3, 4, and 6
may, and in this case does, equal another one-half round Lcs = length of joint of casing, ft
trip, thereby making the work of drilling the hole equiva-
Wcm = effective weight per foot of easing, lb’
lent to two round trips to bottom, which relationship can
be expressed as follows: May be estimated from data given on Table WR-11 for drill
pipe or calculated as follows:
Tc = 2 (T4−T 3 ) (4.3)
Wherein: W = W ( 1 − 0.015B)