Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ORIGIN:
The inception of cloud computing adoption is where the idea of multiple cloud services technology
originated. At first, businesses mostly depended on one cloud service provider to host their apps and take
care of their IT infrastructure. However, as cloud computing developed and companies started looking into
the many services offered by various cloud providers, the concept of utilizing several cloud services at once
gained popularity.
The desire for more resilience and redundancy is one of the main factors driving the adoption of various
cloud services. There may be dangers associated with relying exclusively on one cloud provider in terms of
possible disruptions or outages. Through the distribution of workloads over various cloud platforms,
enterprises can mitigate the effects of the unavailability of a single provider and guarantee uninterrupted
operations.
Furthermore, multi-cloud methods' growing popularity can be attributed in large part to the need for
increased agility and flexibility in IT operations. Distinct features, services, price structures, and geographic
coverage are provided by various cloud providers. By utilizing a variety of suppliers, businesses may select
the solutions that best meet their unique needs, be they compliance, cost-effectiveness, performance
optimization, or geographic reach.
HISTORY:
•Early 2000s: The first wave of cloud computing users relied solely on one supplier.
• Mid-2000s: As a result of the introduction of various cloud services by AWS and other providers, interest in
cloud designs grows.
• The Late 2000s: To ensure redundancy and catastrophe recovery, organizations begin investigating various
cloud services.
• In the early 2010s, orchestration tools and containerization technologies like Docker helped multi-cloud
methods gain acceptance.
• Mid-2010s: The rise in popularity of hybrid cloud architectures paves the way for multi-cloud deployments.
• The late 2010s saw the emergence of cloud management platforms and DevOps techniques as a result of
issues with data security and governance.
• 2020s: Continued expansion in the use of multiple clouds, with an emphasis on workload optimization and
cutting-edge innovations such as edge computing.
ABSTRACT:
Using numerous cloud service providers or platforms at once is a strategic approach known as multiple cloud
services technology. The goal of this strategy is to improve an organization's application management and IT
infrastructure by utilizing the advantages of various cloud providers, like Google Cloud Platform (GCP),
Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and others. This strategy has the advantages of increased
performance, cost optimization, flexibility, and robustness. But it also brings with it difficulties like data
security issues, complex management, and interoperability. Organizations must implement best practices
including automation, cloud-agnostic design, strong security measures, and compliance standards to utilize
different cloud services efficiently. All things considered, many cloud services technology provides an all-
encompassing approach to managing IT infrastructure, fusing the benefits of various cloud providers while
resolving issues through strategic planning and implementation.
INTRODUCTION:
The deliberate use of several cloud service providers or platforms to manage an organization's IT applications
and infrastructure is known as multiple cloud services technology. With this strategy, companies can make
use of the advantages offered by many cloud service providers, like Google Cloud Platform (GCP),
Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and others, for a range of uses.
The ability to deploy apps closer to end users for better performance and user experience, reduced risk of
downtime due to provider-specific issues, and increased flexibility in selecting the best-fit services based on
specific requirements like performance, cost, compliance, and geographical presence, and cost optimization
through competitive pricing and resource allocation are some of the main advantages of multiple cloud
services technology.
Nonetheless, there are drawbacks to managing several cloud platforms, including interoperability issues,
complicated management, and worries about data security. For enterprises to fully capitalize on the
advantages of multi-cloud deployments, best practices such as automation, cloud-agnostic design, strong
security measures, and compliance standards must be implemented.
LITERATURE REVIEW:
Depends on the
underlying
network
infrastructure
for
dependability
and
performance.
7. Keeps an eye on Evaluates the Thorough The difficulty of
FEDARGOS- several cloud cost, security, observation of handling many
V1: A infrastructures performance, federated clouds. data sources.
Monitoring from different and resource
Architecture federated clouds. utilization of Centralized Privacy issues
for Federated federated clouds. administration to with data.
Cloud Centrally gathers provide effective
Computing and compiles analysis. Dependence on
Infrastructures monitoring data. precise
Prompt information
Puts alerting notifications for from federated
systems in place efficient problem- clouds.
for prompt solving.
notifications. scalable for large- Potential effects
scale of ongoing
infrastructure monitoring on
monitoring. performance.
10. Cloud PMW algorithm Time spent on Effective work The complexity
Based Multi- for effectively tasks, use of scheduling with of
Robot Task allocating tasks to resources, the PMW administration
Scheduling several robots at scalability, and algorithm. and
Using PMW once. effectiveness of implementation.
Algorithm performance.
Makes use of Optimal use of
cloud resources to cloud resources Reliance on
manage and for job cloud
assign tasks. distribution. connectivity and
infrastructure.
Tasks and keeps Numerous robots
an eye on work together to
performance in increase Issues with
real-time. performance. performance and
scalability in
Monitoring in different
real-time for environments.
flexible
scheduling.
Possible
variations in
performance
depending on
the network and
available
resources.
11. Enhancing Sky Cap is a loss- Rate of data loss, Improved service The complexity
multi-cloud aware coordinator accessibility of deployment using of
service for the services, a loss-aware administration
deployment deployment of dependability, approach using and
with Sky Cap: multi-cloud and effectiveness Sky Cap. implementation.
A loss-aware services in sky of adaption.
coordinator in computing. Enhanced service Reliance on
sky accessibility and measurements
computing A loss-aware dependability. and network
method takes conditions.
network problems Multi-cloud performance and
and probable data deployment scalability
loss into account. resilience. issues.
effective
Deployment over monitoring-based Need knowledge
several clouds to adaptation. to monitor and
increase adjust.
availability and
dependability.
Observation and
modification
grounded in loss-
aware metrics.
Concerns about
scalability arise
from data centre
clusters and
rising demand.
Locating the
greatest
Services:
Selecting the
greatest services
from a variety
of offered
possibilities.
LIST OF KEYWORDS:
1. Multi-cloud: Using multiple cloud service providers simultaneously.
2. Hybrid cloud: Integrating public and private cloud services.
3. Cloud service providers: Companies offering cloud services.
4. Cloud computing: On-demand delivery of computing resources over the internet.
5. Cloud infrastructure: Hardware and software components supporting cloud services.
6. Service orchestration: Coordinating multiple cloud services for seamless operation.
7. Cloud integration: Integrating different cloud services and platforms.
8. Inter-cloud communication: Communication between different cloud environments.
9. Cloud deployment models: Different ways to deploy cloud services (public, private, hybrid).
10. Cloud networking: Networking infrastructure supporting cloud services.
11. Cloud automation: Automating tasks and processes in cloud environments.
12. Cloud management platforms: Tools for managing and monitoring cloud services.
13. Cloud migration: Moving applications and data to the cloud.
FUTURE WORK:
• Interoperability and Integration: Creating standardized frameworks and protocols to enable smooth
integration and interoperability across various cloud platforms and providers. Facilitating data
interchange, workload migration, and application portability throughout various cloud environments
are some examples of this.
• Security and Compliance: To guarantee strong data protection, privacy, and regulatory compliance
across a variety of cloud services, security methods, and compliance frameworks are being advanced.
This entails improving identity management, auditing capabilities, access limits, and encryption
methods.
• Performance Optimisation: By utilizing technologies like edge computing, content delivery networks
(CDNs), and distributed caching, performance may be continuously improved across multi-cloud
systems. This entails cutting latency, speeding up reaction times, and boosting the functionality of the
application as a whole.
• Cost management: Creating sophisticated optimization and cost management plans to efficiently
control spending and optimize cost savings in multi-cloud installations. This entails using pricing
models to optimize cloud service utilization, allocating resources based on cost-efficiency indicators,
and automating cost analysis.
• AI and Automation: By combining machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities
in multi-cloud settings, jobs can be automated, resource allocation can be optimized, workload
demands can be predicted, and decision-making can be improved. Predictive analytics, auto-scaling,
and intelligent task placement are examples of this.
• Integration of Edge and IoT: This approach combines edge computing and Internet of Things (IoT)
technology with various cloud services to facilitate distributed computing at the edge, low-latency
applications, and real-time data processing. This calls for the smooth integration of cloud
infrastructure, edge devices, and IoT platforms.
• Sustainability and Green Computing: Encouraging green computing techniques and sustainability
projects in multi-cloud settings to minimize carbon emissions, maximize energy efficiency, and
support environmentally friendly cloud operations.
• This includes installing energy-efficient technology, embracing renewable energy sources, and
streamlining data centre operations.
• Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT) and Blockchain: Investigating how to combine DLT and
blockchain with multi-cloud services to improve security, trust, and transparency in distributed
applications and data transactions. This covers data provenance, smart contracts, and identity
management based on blockchain.
CONCLUSION:
REFERENCES:
[1] J. Zhu, P. He, Z. Zheng, and M. R. Lyu, ‘‘Online QoS prediction for runtime service adaptation via adaptive matrix
factorization,’’ IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2911–2924, Oct. 2017.
[2] H. Wang, L. Wang, Q. Yu, Z. Zheng, A. Bouguettaya, and M. R. Lyu ‘‘Online reliability prediction via motifs-based
dynamic Bayesian networks for service-oriented systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 556–579, Jun.
2017.
[3] A. Liu et al., ‘‘Differential private collaborative Web services QoS prediction,’’ in Proc. World Wide Web, 2018, pp.
1–24. doi: 10.1007/s11280-018- 0544-7.
[4] A. Liu et al., ‘‘Privacy-preserving shared collaborative web services QoS prediction,’’ J. Intell. Inf. Syst., vol. 99, pp.
1–20, Aug. 2018. doi: 10.1007/s10844-0180525-4.
[5] A. K. Tripathy and P. K. Tripathy, ‘‘Fuzzy QoS requirement-aware dynamic service discovery and adaptation,’’ Appl.
Soft Compute., vol. 68, pp. 136–146, Jul. 2018.
[6] N. Chen, N. Cardozo, and S. Clarke, ‘‘Goal-driven service composition in mobile and pervasive computing,’’ IEEE
Trans. Services Compute., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49–62, Feb. 2018.
[7] Z. Zheng, X. Wu, Y. Zhang, M. R. Lyu, and J. Wang, ‘‘Qos ranking prediction for cloud services,’’ IEEE Trans. Parallel
Distrib. Syst., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1213–1222, Jun. 2013.
[8] A. Liu, Q. Li, L. Huang, S. Ying, and M. Xiao, ‘‘Coalitional game for community-based autonomous web services
cooperation,’’ IEEE Trans. Services Comput., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 387–399, Sep. 2013.
[9] S. Wen, Q. Li, L. He, A. Liu, J. Tao, and L. Lv, ‘‘Towards automatic construction of skyline composite services,’’ J.
Web Eng., vol. 13, nos. 5–6, pp. 361–377, Nov. 2014.
[10] C. Tang, S. Wen, Q. Li, Y. Xiong, and A. Liu, ‘‘Probabilistic Top-k Dominating Composite Service Selection,’’ in Proc.
IEEE Ninth Int. Conf. E-Bus. Eng., Sep. 2012, pp. 1–8.
[11] S. Wen, C. Tang, Q. G. Li, D. Chiu, A. Liu, and X. N. Han, ‘‘Probabilistic top-K dominating services composition with
uncertain QoS,’’ Service Oriented Comput. Appl., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 91–103, Mar. 2014.
[12] E. K. Asl, J. Bentahar, H. Otrok, and R. Mizouni, ‘‘Efficient community formation for Web services,’’ IEEE Trans.
Services Comput., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 586–600, Jul. 2015.
[13] A. Metrouh and F. Mokhati, ‘‘Social Web services discovery: A community-based approach,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Inf.
Integr. Web-Based Appl. Services, Dec. 2013, pp. 275–279.
[14] H. Yahyaoui, Z. Maamar, E. Lim, and P. Thiran, ‘‘Towards a community-based, social network-driven framework
for web services management,’’ Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1363–1377, Aug. 2013.
[15] X. Zhang, Y. Yin, M. Zhang, and B. Zhang, ‘‘A composite web services discovery technique based on community
mining,’’ in Proc. IEEE AsiaPacific Services Comput. Conf., Jan. 2010, pp. 445–450.
Plagiarism check: