Solution to Previous Year Questions

Course Code: 506

Course Name: Advanced Financial

Managhement

Year: 2018

Prepared By: Shafi Al Mehedi

1|Page Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st

Question no. 1
To estimate the expected rate of return of an individual security held in a well diversified
portfolio we use CAPM. Clarify the issue.
CAPM, or Capital Asset Pricing Model, is a widely used finance theory that helps estimate the expected rate of
return for an individual security within a well-diversified portfolio. Let me break down the key concepts and
clarify how it works.
**1. ** Expected Rate of Return:
The expected rate of return on a security is the anticipated gain or loss from holding that security over a specific
period. It is crucial for investors as it helps them evaluate the potential profitability of an investment.
**2. ** Individual Security vs. Portfolio:
In finance, investors often hold a portfolio of different securities instead of investing in a single security. A well-
diversified portfolio contains a mix of assets, which helps spread the risk. Individual securities within this
portfolio contribute to the overall performance.
**3. ** CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing Model):
CAPM is a financial model that establishes a relationship between the expected return of an asset, the risk-free
rate of return, the asset's beta, and the expected market return. The formula for CAPM is as follows:
Expected Return=Risk-Free Rate+�×(Market Return−Risk-Free Rate)Expected Return=Risk-
Free Rate+β×(Market Return−Risk-Free Rate)
 Risk-Free Rate: The theoretical return on an investment with no risk (usually approximated by
government bond yields).
 Beta (β): A measure of the asset's volatility in relation to the market. A beta of 1 indicates the asset moves
with the market; less than 1 indicates lower volatility, and more than 1 indicates higher volatility.
 Market Return: The expected return of the entire market.
**4. ** Clarifying the Issue:
The issue that CAPM addresses is how to estimate the expected return of an individual security within a well-
diversified portfolio. Here's how it does that:
 Diversification: A well-diversified portfolio eliminates unsystematic (specific to a particular company or
industry) risk. CAPM focuses on systematic risk, which is the risk related to the entire market.
 Beta: By using beta, CAPM quantifies how much the price of an individual security is expected to move
concerning the overall market movement. A higher beta means the stock is riskier but also has the potential
for higher returns, and vice versa.

2|Page Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st

  Risk-Adjusted Return: CAPM provides a risk-adjusted expected return. It considers both the risk-free
rate and the market risk, offering investors a basis to assess whether the potential return compensates for
the risk taken.
In summary, CAPM addresses the challenge of estimating the expected return of an individual security within a
diversified portfolio by factoring in the security's volatility (beta) in relation to the market and provides a
standardized way for investors to evaluate and compare different investment opportunities.

What do you understand by SML graph? How does it differ from CML? What is the relation
between CML and efficient frontier?
The SML (Security Market Line) and CML (Capital Market Line) are essential concepts in finance that help
investors understand the relationship between risk and return. Let's delve into each of them and explore their
differences and connection to the efficient frontier:
SML (Security Market Line):
Definition: The Security Market Line (SML) is a graphical representation of the Capital Asset Pricing Model
(CAPM). It shows the relationship between the expected return and the beta (systematic risk) of a security or a
portfolio.
Key Points:
1. Slope: The slope of the SML represents the market risk premium, which is the additional return investors
expect to receive for taking on additional risk beyond the risk-free rate.
2. Intercept: The SML intersects the y-axis at the risk-free rate because, according to CAPM, the risk-free
rate is the expected return for a risk-free asset (like government bonds).
3. Positioning: Securities or portfolios that lie above the SML are considered undervalued (they offer a
better return for a given level of risk), while those below are overvalued.
CML (Capital Market Line):
Definition: The Capital Market Line (CML) is a tangent line drawn from the risk-free rate to the efficient frontier
of a risky portfolio. It represents a set of portfolios that achieve the maximum expected return for a given level of
risk.
Key Points:
1. Tangent Portfolio: The point where the CML touches the efficient frontier represents the optimal
portfolio (tangent portfolio). This portfolio offers the best risk-return tradeoff.
2. Combining Risk-Free Asset: By investing in a combination of the risk-free asset and the tangent
portfolio, investors can create portfolios along the CML. The weightage of the risk-free asset and the
tangent portfolio in the mix determines the risk-return profile of the portfolio.
3|Page Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st
Relation Between CML and Efficient Frontier:
1. Efficient Frontier: The efficient frontier is a graph representing a set of portfolios that maximize expected
return for a given level of risk or minimize risk for a given level of expected return. It comprises all the
portfolios that offer the highest expected return for a given level of risk or the lowest risk for a given level
of expected return.
2. Connection: The CML is a specific line on the efficient frontier. It represents portfolios that combine a
risk-free asset (represented by the risk-free rate) and a risky portfolio (tangent to the efficient frontier).
The tangent portfolio is the one offering the highest Sharpe ratio (a measure of risk-adjusted return),
making it the optimal portfolio.
In summary, the SML illustrates the relationship between expected return and beta for individual securities or
portfolios, while the CML represents portfolios that combine the risk-free asset and the optimal risky portfolio,
providing the best risk-return tradeoff. Both the CML and the efficient frontier are integral concepts in portfolio
theory, helping investors make informed decisions about their investments.

State the salient features of dividend discount model of stock valuation.

The Dividend Discount Model (DDM) is a valuation method used to determine the fair value of a stock based
on its future dividend payments. Here are the salient features of the Dividend Discount Model:
1. Focus on Dividends:
 Historical Dividends: DDM considers the historical dividend payments made by the company to predict
future dividends.
 Future Dividends: Future dividends are estimated based on the company's dividend payment history and
its ability to generate profits.
2. Time Value of Money:
 Discounting: DDM incorporates the time value of money, meaning future dividend payments are
discounted back to their present value using a discount rate.
 Discount Rate: The discount rate used in DDM is often the required rate of return, which accounts for
the risk associated with the investment.
3. Constant Growth Assumption (Gordon Growth Model):
 DDM often uses the Gordon Growth Model, assuming dividends will grow at a constant rate (g)
indefinitely.
 Formula: Value=Dividend×(1+�)Discount Rate−�Value=Discount Rate−gDividend×(1+g)
4. Limitations and Variations:

4|Page Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st

  Applicability: DDM is most suitable for stable, mature companies with a consistent dividend payment
history.
 Variations: There are variations of DDM, including the two-stage DDM (for companies with changing
dividend growth rates) and the H-model (combining high growth and stable growth periods).
5. Sensitivity to Assumptions:
 DDM is highly sensitive to the growth rate assumption. Small changes in the growth rate can significantly
impact the calculated stock value.
 Sensitivity analysis is often performed to assess the impact of different growth rate scenarios on the stock
valuation.
6. No Consideration for Non-Dividend Stocks:
 DDM is not suitable for valuing stocks that do not pay dividends. It does not account for companies
reinvesting profits back into the business instead of distributing them as dividends.
7. Long-Term Investment Perspective:
 DDM is more suitable for investors with a long-term perspective who are interested in the income
generated from dividends.
8. Market Efficiency Consideration:
 DDM assumes that the market prices stocks rationally based on their future dividends. If the market is not
efficient, DDM valuations might not accurately reflect the true value of a stock.
In summary, the Dividend Discount Model is a widely used approach for estimating the intrinsic value of a stock
based on its expected future dividend payments. However, it is important to carefully consider its assumptions
and limitations before using it for investment decisions.

A key input for the Gordon Growth Model is the expended constant growth rate in dividends
over the long term. What important issues should be noted relating to this expected growth
rate?
The expected constant growth rate in dividends (often denoted as �g) is a crucial input for the Gordon Growth
Model, also known as the dividend discount model with constant growth. Here are the important issues and
considerations related to this expected growth rate:
1. Stability and Sustainability:
 The growth rate should be stable and sustainable over the long term. Sudden changes in growth rates can
significantly impact the valuation. Historical trends and the company's future plans should be considered
to assess the stability of the growth rate.
2. Consistency with Historical Data:
5|Page Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st
  The expected growth rate should align with the company's historical growth patterns. If the historical
growth rate has been relatively stable, it may provide a reasonable estimate for the future. Deviations from
historical norms should be justified with solid reasoning.
3. Industry and Economic Factors:
 Consideration of industry-specific and broader economic factors is crucial. Industries experiencing rapid
technological advancements or economic fluctuations might have different growth rates. Analyzing
industry trends and economic forecasts can provide insights into future growth prospects.
4. Market Saturation and Competitive Position:
 Companies operating in saturated markets or facing intense competition might experience slower growth.
Assess the company's competitive position and market saturation to estimate a realistic growth rate.
5. Management Quality and Strategies:
 Competent management and effective strategic plans can drive growth. Evaluate the quality of the
management team and their ability to execute growth strategies. Company announcements, business plans,
and management discussions are valuable sources of information.
6. Dividend Payout Ratio:
 The dividend payout ratio (dividends as a percentage of earnings) influences the growth rate. A high
payout ratio implies limited reinvestment in the business, potentially leading to slower growth.
Conversely, a lower payout ratio suggests more retained earnings for future investments, supporting higher
growth.
7. Economic and Regulatory Changes:
 Changes in tax laws, regulations, or government policies can affect a company's ability to grow dividends.
Stay informed about potential legislative changes that could impact the company's financial decisions.
8. Currency and Inflation Considerations:
 If analyzing companies across different countries, consider currency exchange rates and inflation rates.
These factors can affect both dividends and discount rates, impacting the growth rate calculation.
9. Sensitivity Analysis:
 Perform sensitivity analysis by varying the growth rate to understand its impact on the valuation. This
helps in assessing the model's sensitivity to changes in the growth rate assumption.
10. Expert Opinions and Analyst Forecasts:
 Analyst reports and expert opinions can provide valuable insights into a company's future growth
prospects. However, these should be critically evaluated and not solely relied upon.

6|Page Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st

Considering these factors and conducting thorough research is essential when estimating the expected constant
growth rate for the Gordon Growth Model. A well-informed estimation enhances the accuracy of the valuation
and supports more reliable investment decisions.

Define some popular multiples of Comparable Method of Stock Valuation. What limitations
you find in high P/E or low P/E?
In the Comparable Company Analysis (CCA) or Comparable Method, multiples are used to compare a company's
valuation relative to similar companies in the market. Here are some popular multiples used in this method:
1. Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio:

Limitations of High P/E or Low P/E:

1. High P/E:
 Overvaluation Risk: A high P/E ratio might indicate overvaluation, suggesting that investors are willing
to pay a premium for the company's earnings. This can lead to a price bubble, making the stock vulnerable
to a price correction.
 High Expectations: High P/E ratios often imply high growth expectations. If the company fails to meet
these expectations, the stock price can drop significantly, leading to investor losses.
2. Low P/E:
 Undervaluation Risk: A low P/E ratio might suggest undervaluation, but it can also indicate market
concerns about the company's future prospects. Investors might avoid stocks with low P/E ratios, fearing
poor growth potential.
7|Page Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st
  Value Traps: Stocks with low P/E ratios might be perceived as value investments, but they could be
"value traps" if there are fundamental reasons for the low valuation, such as declining earnings or
unfavorable market conditions.
In summary, while P/E ratios are valuable tools for valuation, they should be interpreted cautiously and in the
context of the company's industry, growth prospects, and overall market conditions. High P/E ratios might
indicate investor confidence but also high risk, while low P/E ratios could signify undervaluation or fundamental
issues. Careful analysis and consideration of various factors are essential to make informed investment decisions.

A company has declared a dividend of Tk. 40 per share this year. The company is a rapidly
growing one and it is expected that the company will grow at 30% a year for the next two years.
In years 3 and 4 the expected growth rate is 18%. After that the growth rate will come down to
8% and it is expected to continue. The required rate of return from the company's stock is 18%.
Calculate the value of the stock.
To calculate the value of the stock with different growth rates, you can use the Gordon Growth Model (also known
as the dividend discount model with constant growth) for each period of growth, and then sum up the present
values of these future dividends. Here's how you can do it step by step for each period:

8|Page Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st

Explain the financial life cycle of a firm under Stage Model of Financing.
A firm that has no debt has a market value of $100 million and a cost of equity of 11%. In the
Miller-Modigliani world,
i. What happens to the value of the firm as the leverage is changed? (Assume no taxes)
ii. What happens to the cost of capital as the leverage is changed? (Assume no taxes)
iii. How would your answers to (i) and (ii) change if there are laxes? :
A firm that has no debt has a market value of $100 million and a cost of equity of 11%. In the
Miller–Modigliani world.
a. what happens to the value of the firm as the leverage is changed (assume no taxes)?
b. what happens to the cost of capital as the leverage is changed (assume no taxes)?
c. how would your answers to a and b change if there are taxes?
In the Miller-Modigliani world, the value of a firm with no debt is unaffected by changes in leverage. This is
known as the Modigliani-Miller theorem, which states that in the absence of taxes and other market imperfections,
the value of a firm is determined solely by its underlying assets and the cash flows they generate. Therefore, the
firm's value remains at $100 million regardless of the amount of debt it has.

However, the cost of equity does change as leverage is increased. The cost of equity is the return required by
equity investors to compensate for the risk they bear. As leverage increases, the risk to equity investors also
increases, leading to a higher cost of equity. This is because debt introduces financial risk and increases the
volatility of equity returns.

If taxes are introduced, the answers to parts a and b would change. Taxes create a benefit for debt financing known
as the tax shield. The interest paid on debt is tax-deductible, reducing the firm's taxable income and therefore its
tax liability. As a result, the value of the firm would increase as leverage is increased because the tax shield
provides a benefit to the firm.

Similarly, the cost of capital would decrease as leverage is increased due to the tax shield. The cost of debt is
lower than the cost of equity because interest payments are tax-deductible. As the proportion of debt in the capital
structure increases, the overall cost of capital decreases, reflecting the lower cost of debt.

9|Page Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st

In summary, in the presence of taxes, increasing leverage would increase the value of the firm and decrease the
cost of capital.

State the dividend policies from a firm's and its investors' viewpoints.
Dividend policies are crucial decisions made by a firm's management and are viewed differently from the
perspectives of the firm and its investors. Here's how these policies are perceived from both viewpoints:
From the Firm's Viewpoint:
**1. ** Stability and Predictability:
 Firms often prefer stable and predictable dividend payments. Regular dividends can create investor
confidence, attract long-term shareholders, and stabilize the stock price.
**2. ** Profit Reinvestment:
 Firms may retain earnings to reinvest in the business. This retained profit can be used for research and
development, expansion, acquisitions, or debt reduction, leading to potential future growth and increased
shareholder value.
**3. ** Tax Considerations:
 Dividends are taxed differently in various jurisdictions. Firms might consider tax implications when
deciding on dividend payouts. For instance, some countries tax dividends at a higher rate than capital
gains, influencing the dividend policy.
**4. ** Cash Flow and Liquidity:
 Firms need to assess their cash flow and liquidity positions. Dividends should not jeopardize the
company's ability to meet its operational and financial obligations. Prudent cash management is vital for
business stability.
**5. ** Investor Expectations:
 Meeting investor expectations is important. If investors expect regular dividends, sudden changes in the
dividend policy can adversely affect the stock price. Clear communication about dividend expectations is
crucial.
From the Investors' Viewpoint:
**1. ** Income Stream:
 Investors, especially income-focused ones like retirees, often rely on dividends as a stable income stream.
Regular dividend payments can provide a consistent source of cash flow, helping investors meet financial
obligations.
**2. ** Capital Gains vs. Dividends:

10 | P a g e Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st

  Investors weigh the benefits of receiving dividends against potential capital gains. Some investors prefer
dividends as they provide tangible returns, while others might prefer reinvesting earnings to benefit from
stock appreciation.
**3. ** Stability and Confidence:
 Investors tend to have confidence in companies that consistently pay dividends. Regular dividends can
signal financial stability and management confidence in the company's future earnings.
**4. ** Tax Efficiency:
 In some jurisdictions, dividends might be taxed differently from capital gains. Investors consider the tax
implications of dividends when making investment decisions. Tax-efficient dividend payouts can be
attractive.
**5. ** Share Repurchases:
 Some investors prefer share repurchases over dividends. When a company buys back its shares, it reduces
the number of outstanding shares, potentially increasing the stock price and benefiting shareholders
through capital gains.
In summary, dividend policies are a balancing act for firms and investors. Firms need to balance reinvestment for
growth, cash flow, and investor expectations, while investors consider dividends as a source of income, stability,
and tax efficiency, along with potential capital gains. The chosen dividend policy often reflects the company's
financial health, growth prospects, and the preferences of its investor base.

GL Corporation, a retail firm, is making a decision on how much it should pay out to its
Stockholders. It has $100 million in investible funds. The following information is provided
about the firm:
i) It has 100 million shares outstanding, each share selling for $15. The beta of the stock s 1.25
and the risk free rate is 8%. The expected return on the market is 16%.
ii) The firm has $ 500 million of debt outstanding. The marginal interest rate on the debt $
12%.
iii) The corporation's tax rate is 50%.

11 | P a g e Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st

The firm plans to finance all its investment needs at its current debt ratio.
Should the firm return money to its stockholders?
If so, how much should be returned to stockholders?
GL Corporation, a retail firm, is making a decision on how much it should pay out to its stockholders. It has $100
million in investable funds. The following information is provided about the firm:
• It has 100 million shares outstanding, each share selling for $15. The beta of the stock is 1.25 and the risk-free
rate is 8%. The expected return on the market is 16%.
• The firm has $500 million of debt outstanding. The marginal interest rate on the debt is 12%.
• The corporation's tax rate is 50%.
• The firm has the following investment projects:
Project
Project Investment Requirement After-Tax Return on Capital
A $15 million 27%
B $10 million 20%
C $25 million 16%
D $20 million 14%
E $30 million 12%

• The firm plans to finance all its investment needs at its current debt ratio.
a. Should the company return money to its stock-holders?
b. If so, how much should be returned to stock-holders?

12 | P a g e Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st

Describe the Common Characteristics of Merger or Acquisition
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) involve the combination of two or more companies to create a larger entity or
the purchase of one company by another. Several common characteristics define the process and outcomes of
mergers and acquisitions:
1. Change in Ownership:
 Merger: In a merger, two companies agree to combine their operations, assets, and liabilities to form a
new entity. The original companies cease to exist as separate legal entities.
 Acquisition: In an acquisition, one company (the acquirer) purchases another company (the target). The
target company becomes a subsidiary of the acquiring company, retaining its legal identity.

13 | P a g e Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st

2. Strategic Intent:
 Synergy: M&A activities often aim to achieve synergies, where the combined entity generates greater
value, efficiency, and profitability than the sum of individual companies.
 Diversification: Companies might merge or acquire to diversify their product offerings, enter new
markets, or enhance their competitive advantage.
3. Financial Considerations:
 Purchase Price: The acquiring company usually pays a premium over the target company's market value
to persuade existing shareholders to sell their shares.
 Funding: Acquisitions can be financed through cash, stock, debt, or a combination of these methods. The
funding structure impacts the financial health of the merged entity.
4. Due Diligence:
 Financial Analysis: Detailed financial analysis of the target company's assets, liabilities, revenue,
expenses, and future projections is conducted.
 Legal and Regulatory Compliance: Thorough examination of legal contracts, intellectual property
rights, regulatory compliance, and potential legal liabilities is essential.
5. Integration Planning:
 Operational Integration: Planning how the merged entity will operate, including combining workforces,
integrating IT systems, and streamlining business processes.
 Cultural Integration: Addressing cultural differences between the merging entities' workforces to foster
collaboration and teamwork.
6. Regulatory Approval:
 Mergers and acquisitions often require approval from regulatory authorities to ensure they do not create
monopolies or harm market competition. Antitrust regulations play a significant role.
7. Stakeholder Communication:
 Effective communication with stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and investors, is
crucial to maintain trust and manage expectations during the transition period.
8. Post-Merger Evaluation:
 Evaluating the success of the merger or acquisition by comparing actual results with the projected
synergies and financial benefits. Post-merger integration challenges and successes are analyzed for future
strategic planning.
9. Risks and Challenges:
 Cultural Clashes: Differences in organizational culture and management styles can create challenges in
integrating teams and decision-making processes.

14 | P a g e Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st

  Integration Issues: Operational challenges in aligning business processes, technology systems, and
human resources of the merged entities.
 Financial Risks: Fluctuations in the stock market, interest rates, or economic conditions can impact the
financial health of the merged entity.
In summary, mergers and acquisitions are complex processes involving strategic, financial, legal, and operational
considerations. Successful M&A activities require meticulous planning, due diligence, effective integration
strategies, and continuous evaluation to ensure the combined entity achieves its intended goals and benefits all
stakeholders involved.

What strategies could the target company's management adopt preventing future and ongoing
takeover?
Target companies often employ various strategies to prevent future and ongoing takeovers, aiming to protect their
interests and maintain their independence. Here are several strategies that target company management might
adopt:
1. Poison Pill Defense:
 Definition: The company issues new shares to existing shareholders or rights to buy additional shares at
a significant discount if a hostile takeover is attempted.
 Effect: Dilutes the ownership stake of the acquiring company, making the acquisition more expensive and
less attractive.
2. Share Buybacks:
 Definition: The company buys back its own shares from the market, increasing the demand and thus the
price per share.
 Effect: Raises the stock price, making the acquisition more costly for the acquiring company.
3. Staggered Board of Directors:
 Definition: The board of directors is divided into multiple classes, with each class serving a different
term.
 Effect: Prevents hostile acquirers from gaining control of the entire board in a single election, making it
more challenging to take over the company.
4. Supermajority Voting Provisions:
 Definition: Requiring a high percentage of shareholder votes (more than a simple majority) to approve
certain decisions, such as a merger or sale of assets.
 Effect: Raises the threshold for approval, making it more difficult for an acquiring company to gain
control.
15 | P a g e Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st
5. Golden Parachutes:
 Definition: Key executives receive lucrative financial packages if the company is taken over.
 Effect: Discourages executives from cooperating with potential acquirers, as they would lose these
benefits in case of a takeover.
6. Crown Jewel Defense:
 Definition: The company sells its most valuable assets to another party if a hostile takeover is imminent.
 Effect: Diminishes the attractiveness of the target company, making it less appealing for the acquirer.
7. White Knight Defense:
 Definition: The target company seeks a more favorable merger or acquisition deal with a friendly third
party, known as the white knight, to counter the hostile takeover attempt.
 Effect: Provides an alternative for shareholders, potentially leading to a merger that is more aligned with
the target company's interests.
8. Litigation:
 Definition: The target company initiates legal proceedings to delay or block the hostile takeover.
 Effect: Creates legal uncertainties for the acquiring company, potentially discouraging them from
pursuing the takeover further.
9. Greenmail:
 Definition: The target company buys back its shares from the hostile acquirer at a premium.
 Effect: Discourages the hostile acquirer by making a profit but also signals that the company is willing to
negotiate.
10. Restrictive Charter/Bylaw Provisions:
 Definition: Including provisions in the company's charter or bylaws that make takeovers more
challenging, such as limiting the ability of shareholders to call special meetings.
 Effect: Adds hurdles for hostile acquirers, making the process more complicated and time-consuming.
It's important to note that these strategies have their own advantages and limitations. The choice of defense tactics
depends on the specific circumstances, legal regulations in the jurisdiction, and the preferences of the target
company's management and shareholders. Often, a combination of these strategies might be employed to
maximize the chances of preventing a hostile takeover.

16 | P a g e Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st

Would it be possible to form a profitable company by merging two companies both of which
are business failures? Explain.
Merging two failing companies does not guarantee the formation of a profitable company. While mergers can
sometimes provide synergies and efficiencies that lead to a stronger business, merging two failing companies
presents significant challenges and risks. Here's why it might not be a straightforward path to profitability:
1. Underlying Issues Persist:
 If the fundamental reasons for the failure of the individual companies are not addressed, merging them
won't automatically resolve these problems. Issues like poor management, outdated business models, high
debt, or lack of market demand need to be identified and rectified.
2. Financial Challenges:
 Failing companies typically have financial issues, including debts, liabilities, and cash flow problems.
Merging these companies can result in a larger entity with consolidated financial problems, making it
difficult to secure financing or attract investors.
3. Cultural Misalignment:
 Companies often have distinct cultures, work processes, and employee attitudes. Merging failing
companies with different cultures can lead to internal conflicts, resistance to change, and a lack of
collaboration, hindering the integration process.
4. Market Perception:
 Failing companies often have damaged reputations in the market. Merging two such companies might not
improve the market perception of the new entity, making it challenging to attract customers, partners, and
suppliers.
5. Lack of Competitive Edge:
 Failing companies are usually struggling to compete effectively. Merging them might not create a stronger
competitive advantage unless the combined entity can offer a unique value proposition, innovation, or
operational efficiency that competitors lack.
6. Integration Challenges:
 Integrating operations, systems, and personnel from two failing companies can be exceptionally complex.
Poorly managed integrations can lead to disruptions in services, customer dissatisfaction, and operational
inefficiencies.
7. Management and Leadership Issues:
 Merging failing companies requires strong leadership and strategic vision. If the leadership teams of both
companies lack the necessary skills or experience, the merged entity may continue to struggle with
decision-making and direction.
17 | P a g e Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st
8. Legal and Regulatory Challenges:
 Merging failing companies might involve legal and regulatory challenges, especially if there are pending
lawsuits, contract disputes, or regulatory compliance issues. Resolving these matters can be time-
consuming and costly.
9. Lack of Innovation:
 Failing companies might lack innovation and creative solutions. Merging them without a clear strategy
for innovation and adapting to changing market demands may result in continued stagnation.
While theoretically, it's possible for a successful business to emerge from merging failing companies, it requires
meticulous planning, effective leadership, substantial investment, and a comprehensive strategy to address the
underlying issues. Companies considering such mergers should conduct thorough due diligence, develop a robust
integration plan, and assess the feasibility of creating a genuinely viable and competitive business before
proceeding.

Write short notes on

a. Leveraged Buyouts
b. Imperfection in Hedging
c.. Clientele Effect
d. Reconstruction and Liquidation
e. Voluntary Settlement
a. Leveraged Buyouts (LBOs):
Definition: A Leveraged Buyout (LBO) is a financial strategy where an acquiring company uses a significant
amount of borrowed money (often in the form of loans or bonds) to finance the purchase of another company.
The assets of the target company are often used as collateral for the loans. LBOs are commonly conducted by
private equity firms to acquire controlling stakes in existing businesses. Key Points:
 High Debt: LBOs involve high levels of debt, which means increased financial risk. The goal is to use
the acquired company's assets and cash flows to repay the debt and generate profits.
 Restructuring: After acquisition, the acquired company might undergo restructuring, including cost-
cutting, operational improvements, and asset sales, to enhance its profitability and increase the chances of
successful debt repayment.
 Exit Strategies: Private equity firms typically plan exit strategies, such as selling the company at a higher
valuation or taking it public through an initial public offering (IPO), to generate returns for their investors.
b. Imperfection in Hedging:
18 | P a g e Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st
Definition: Imperfection in hedging refers to the inability to perfectly hedge against financial risks, such as
currency fluctuations, interest rate changes, or commodity price volatility. No hedging strategy can entirely
eliminate risk exposure. Key Points:
 Basis Risk: Hedging instruments might not perfectly mirror the underlying asset being hedged, leading
to basis risk. For example, futures contracts might not perfectly align with the price movements of the
underlying asset.
 Liquidity Constraints: In some cases, financial markets might lack sufficiently liquid hedging
instruments, making it challenging to hedge large or complex exposures effectively.
 Timing Risks: Hedging decisions are often time-sensitive. Market conditions can change rapidly, making
it difficult to execute hedging strategies at optimal moments.
c. Clientele Effect:
Definition: The Clientele Effect refers to the phenomenon where a company's stock price is influenced by the
preferences and needs of its shareholder base. Different types of investors (such as income-focused investors or
growth-oriented investors) prefer different dividend policies and investment strategies, which can affect the
company's stock price. Key Points:
 Dividend Policies: Companies might adjust their dividend policies based on the preferences of their
shareholders. For instance, if a company's shareholders prefer steady income, the company might maintain
a stable dividend payout to attract and retain these investors.
 Stock Price Impact: Changes in dividend policies can influence the stock price. A shift in dividend
payments might lead to changes in the composition of the shareholder base, affecting demand and supply
dynamics in the market.
d. Reconstruction and Liquidation:
Definition: Reconstruction and Liquidation refer to the processes of reorganizing a financially distressed or
underperforming company to improve its financial health or, in extreme cases, winding up the company's
operations and selling its assets to repay creditors. Key Points:
 Reconstruction: In reconstruction, the company undergoes financial and operational restructuring. This
might involve renegotiating debts, selling non-core assets, implementing cost-cutting measures, and
seeking new investments to improve the company's viability.
 Liquidation: Liquidation involves selling off all assets of the company to repay its debts and obligations.
This process usually occurs if the company cannot be rehabilitated or if selling assets individually is more
profitable than keeping the company operational.
e. Voluntary Settlement:

19 | P a g e Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st

Definition: Voluntary Settlement refers to an agreement between a debtor and its creditors, where the debtor
proposes a repayment plan to settle its debts voluntarily, often under the guidance of a court-appointed trustee or
mediator. Key Points:
 Negotiated Terms: The debtor negotiates with creditors to propose a repayment plan based on the debtor's
financial capabilities. Creditors might agree to reduce the total debt amount, extend the repayment period,
or lower the interest rates to facilitate successful repayment.
 Legal Protection: Voluntary settlements can provide legal protection to debtors against aggressive debt
collection actions, such as lawsuits, wage garnishments, or property seizures, allowing debtors to work
towards settling their debts in a structured manner.
 Debt Management: Voluntary settlements are often part of debt management strategies, helping debtors
avoid bankruptcy while addressing their financial obligations and gradually becoming debt-free.

20 | P a g e Shafi Al Mehedi | Finance 21st