Professional Documents
Culture Documents
prepared by
1 | STF 3013
INTRODUCTION
The Final Year Project 1 (STF 3013) constitutes the proposal and preliminary (progress) components
of the full Final Year Project undertaken by final year students during the first semester of their final
year. The proposal document describes the proposed intention and justification of the project and
generally includes the problem statement, objectives, literature background, proposed methodologies
and a timeline needed to finish the project.
All sections and their sub-sections (hence, the headings and sub-headings) should be listed
appropriately with their associated page numbers. Roman numerical (i, ii, and iii) is to be used for
page numbers starting from Title and Front Cover, Table of Contents, List of Tables, List of Figures,
List of Abbreviations and Summary. Arabic numerical (1, 2, and 3) is for subsequent pages,
beginning from the Introduction, until the end. Please refer to Appendix A for format of the Title
and Front Cover and Appendix B for the Table of Content.
Details of each sections and their allocated evaluation marks (in percentage) are as follows:
Summary (10%)
The Summary section should provide a brief outline of the proposed intention for the study and
should contain the problem statement, main aim, general methodology in performing the research,
expected outcomes and key implications. This section should not exceed 250 words, and do not
require any sub-sectioning. The whole Summary should encompass of only one (1) paragraph.
Introduction (20%)
The main items that should be included in this section are the research background, problem
statement and the proposed objectives. The research background should be relevant and focused on
the problem statement. Whenever and wherever information is taken or adapted from literature, the
source must be cited. In-text citation should be based on an appropriate and standard referencing
system (refer to the Literature Review section, 2nd paragraph). The proposed objectives must be
specific and seek to address the research questions. The Introduction should not exceed two (2)
pages, without any sub-section.
2 | STF 3013
Literature Review (30%)
This section should be devoted to reviewing literatures related to the study, and it should be relevant
and specific to the proposed study. Students should use this section to strengthen the background of
their study so that readers will have adequate knowledge to properly understand the research
proposal. This can include a review on the taxonomy, methodology, current state of the knowledge,
and gaps in the knowledge. The Literature Review should have proper sub-sections, each with sub-
headings, related to the project. Only figures/diagrams, tables or charts (if any) that are directly
relevant to the main body of text should be included in this section. Extra figures/diagrams, tables, or
charts should be incorporated in the Appendices.
In writing this section, students are advised to include the latest literature relevant to their studies.
Except for direct quotations, all statements (or arguments) taken from literature must be paraphrased;
and quotations and statements taken/adapted from literature must have proper citation of the source.
In referring to sources of literature, in-text citations should be included in the main body of text
whenever necessary. In-text citation should follow the Harvard Referencing system only, that is, last
name followed by year. Refer to the example below:
A research proposal should represent a research document that explains the intention and
rationale of the proposed study (Smith, 1970). According to Jefferson and Wayne (1979), for
most types of research study, it is sufficient to have only one research question for each research
proposal. However, studies have shown that the complexity of most disciplines today may
warrant the need for more that one research question in a single study (Simms et al., 1982).
Citation of any publication with three or more authors should use the surname of only the first
author, followed by et al., and the year of publication.
The simultaneous and quantitative analysis of endogenous expression will be carried out using
the SAGE assay (Kinzler and Vogelstein, 1990). Subsequently, comparative profiles will be
analyzed using the MATCTM Software (Version 1.0.2, Techsource, USA) which is based on the
Spearman-Longines Matrix Algorithm (Spearman et al., 1989). Additionally, the Q-Test (Lang,
1995) will be performed for statistical validation of the differential profile among samples.
Sub-sections can be used to demarcate different parts of the methodology, for example, Field
Method, Laboratory Work, and Statistical Analysis.
3 | STF 3013
facts. In addition, they must be coherent to the research question and hypothesis of the proposed
study.
References (10%)
All references cited in the text should be listed here, and similarly, all authors named in this section
must be cited in the thesis. Statements or methods by previous researchers whose authenticity have
been acknowledged must laso be cited. Generally, each reference should contain the following items:
1. Author’s name
2. The publication year of the article
3. Title of the article
4. Name of the journal
5. Volume and page
Examples of listing references based on Harvard Referencing system are shown below:
Jia, B. H.; Li, J. F. and Gu, M. (2007). Two-photon Polymerization for Three-Dimensional Photonic
Devices in Polymers and Nanocomposites. Australian Journal of Chemistry, 60 (7), 484-495.
Bergeron, B. (2002). Bioinformatics computing. New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education Inc. and
Prentice Hall.
Ipor, I. B.; Tawan, C. S.; Ismail, J. and Bojo, O. (1998). Floristic Compositions and Structures of
Forest at Bario Highlands, Sarawak. In G. Ismail, & L. Din (Eds.), A Scientific Journey
Through Borneo: Bario, the Kelabit Highland of Sarawak. (pp. 113-132). Kuching, Malaysia:
Pelanduk Publication.
Nyanti, L.; Ismail, N. and Lo, M. L. K. F. (2005). Fish, Crustacean and Cephalopod Fauna and Their
Fisheries of the Paloh Mangrove, Rajang Estuary, Sarawak. In A. A. Tuen & I. Das (Eds.),
Wallace in Sarawak – 150 years later. Proceedings of an International Conference on
Biogeography and Biodiversity, July 13-15, (pp. 162-177). Kota Samarahan, Malaysia:
Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2007). Laws and regulations. Retrieved July 24, 2007, from
http://www.epa.gov/epahome/lawregs.html
4 | STF 3013
Every student should refer to their supervisor for a specific style/format that is required in their
particular field/department (or is preferred by the supervisor). There is no limit on the number of
references used, but web-based (internet/online) information sources should not exceed 5% of
total references used. If internet information is used, it must be from valid sources (e.g. government
agencies, and accredited academic and research institutions). Reference from internet sources must
include the retrieval date and URL address and a hardcopy of the first page to the webpage should be
attached as appendix. Online articles from refereed journals (usually also available in printed
version) is considered as valid literature/report source and should be listed according to normal
journal paper format.
Published reports from previous Final Year Projects can be considered, as published reports and can
be cited and listed as book reference. This also applies to reports from approved Masters and
Doctoral theses. However, information from documents, data or reports that cannot be assessed by
the public is considered as unpublished data and should be cited as personal communication (pers
comm.) or as unpublished data.
PLAGIARISM
Based on the UNIMAS Academic Regulation for Undergraduate Studies (Item 11.1), plagiarism is
defined as any effort/work (including course assignment and final year project proposal/report) that
directly reproduces the published work of others without adequate acknowledgement to the original
author(s). It also includes direct adaptation or copying of sentences or paragraphs, from any
reference without citing the source. Plagiarism is an act of academic dishonesty and perpetrators can
be subjected to disciplinary action (Item 11.1, UNIMAS Academic Regulation - Undergraduate
Studies).
3. Line spacing should be double (except for Title and Summary pages). This applies also to
footnotes, lengthy quotations, appendices, and headings and sub-headings. However, legends and
captions for Tables and Figures, and list of references should be single spacing.
4. The font type and size for the main body of text should be Times New Roman, size 12. Headings
and sub-headings should be highlighted in bold. Headings should also be in Title format (with
lower case for conjunctions). Students are advised not to use the chapter system, but should
adhere to the section and sub-section system.
5. Tables and Figures are only allowed if they support and aid readers in the understanding of the
proposal. They should not contain detailed data or extensive amount of raw data, because such
table and figures should be included as Appendices. All tables and figures provided should be
referred to in the main body of text of the relevant sections (or sub-sections). Captions for all
tables should be written at the top o the table, while for figures the captions should be written at
5 | STF 3013
the bottom of the figure. The caption should be brief but sufficiently informative to reflect the
content. The font type and size for legends and captions of tables and figures should be Times
New Roman, size 10 at single spacing. If the tables and figures are taken or adapted from other
works, the appropriate sources should be cited.
7. Each proposal document should be between 10-12 pages (excluding the Appendices). Page
numbers should be printed 25 mm from the bottom edge and placed in the centre.
The research proposal should be typed using MS word format. At least two (2) hard copies of the
draft proposal should be submitted to the Programme Coordinator for the purpose of evaluation. The
draft proposal for each student will be evaluated by the Supervisor and at least one Examiner (other
than the supervisor or co-supervisor). This should be carried out before the oral presentation of the
proposal.
The corrected and final version of the proposal (in stapler-bound form) should be submitted one (1)
week after the oral presentation. One (1) hard copy of this proposal should be distributed to each of
the following person:
1. Programme Coordinator
2. Supervisor, and
3. Co-supervisor (if any).
6 | STF 3013
Appendix A: Example of the Title and Front Cover
Student’s Name
(Times New Roman, Bold 12, Centre)
Name of Programme
(Times New Roman, Normal 9, Centre)
7 | STF 3013
Appendix B: Example of the Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents ii
List of Figure iv
List of Abbreviations v
Summary 1
Introduction 2
Literature Review 4
Heading 1 4
Sub-heading 1 4
Sub-heading 2 6
Heading 2 8
Sub-heading 1 8
Sub-heading 2 11
Heading 3 13
Sub-heading 1 13
Sub-heading 2 16
Expected Outcomes 30
Work Schedule 31
References 32
Appendices 38
8 | STF 3013
Appendix C: Example of a Gantt chart on work schedule
Data analysis
Data validation:
Statistical analysis
Report writing and
presentation
9 | STF 3013