Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s11164-011-0349-0
Received: 8 May 2011 / Accepted: 12 July 2011 / Published online: 27 July 2011
Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011
Introduction
In recent years there has been increasing interest to the development of organic/
inorganic hybrid materials [1]. These materials have a good combination of the
different properties of the individual components and have potential applications in
123
324 A. Olad, R. Nosrati
123
Polyaniline/ZnO nanocomposite 325
Experimental
Ammonium persulfate (APS), hydrochloric acid, and methylene blue (MB) were
purchased from Merck Chemicals and were used as received. The structure and
characteristics of MB dye are shown in Table 1. Aniline was purchased from Merck
123
326 A. Olad, R. Nosrati
Chemicals and was doubly distilled before use. ZnO nanoparticles with an average
particle size of less than 50 nm were purchased from Neutrino Company.
Nanocomposite synthesis
Characterization
Photodegradation experiments
123
Polyaniline/ZnO nanocomposite 327
Absorbance (a.u.)
Analysis of X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns was used to investigate the structure of
PANI/ZnO nanocomposite. Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of PANI/ZnO
nanocomposite, ZnO nanoparticles, and pure PANI. The XRD patterns of pristine
PANI has a weak broad peak at 2h = 25, because of its amorphous structure with
low crystallinity. The XRD patterns of ZnO nanoparticles have characteristic peaks
of ZnO with the crystalline structure of wurtzite. The XRD patterns of PANI/ZnO
nanocomposite include the characteristic peaks of both PANI and ZnO, which
confirms the formation of nanocomposite with lower crystallinity.
123
328 A. Olad, R. Nosrati
Intensity (a.u.)
15 25 35 45 55 65 75
2theta (deg.)
Fig. 2 XRD patterns of polyaniline (PANI) (a), PANI/ZnO nanocomposite (b), and ZnO nanoparticles (c)
Absorbance (a.u.)
Fig. 3 UV–visible spectra of ZnO nanoparticles (a), pristine PANI (b), and PANI/ZnO nanocomposite (c)
123
Polyaniline/ZnO nanocomposite 329
transfer from PANI to ZnO via hydrogen bonding. According to these results, the
PANI/ZnO nanocomposite synthesized in this study has an absorption peak in the
visible light region, in other words it can be photoactivated by visible light
irradiation, which has no effect on health, in contrast with the pristine ZnO
photocatalyst nanoparticles which are photoactivated under harmful UV light
irradiation. This may be the main advantage of the PANI/ZnO nanocomposite
prepared in this study, which has a special structure which is only photoactivated
under visible light irradiation and has higher photocatalytic activity in this region
compared with previously reported PANI/ZnO composite materials [19, 27].
Morphological studies
123
330 A. Olad, R. Nosrati
Photocatalytic studies
123
Polyaniline/ZnO nanocomposite 331
Comparison of photocatalysts
0.8
0.6
C/C0
0.4
under UV
irradiation
0.2
under Visible
light irradiation
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (min)
123
332 A. Olad, R. Nosrati
0.8
0.6
C/C0
0.4
ZnO
0.2
PANI
PANI/ZnO nanocomposite
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (min)
Fig. 7 Normalized concentrations of MB in solution against contact time during photocatalytic degradation
by use of the different photocatalysts ZnO nanoparticles, pristine PANI, and PANI/ZnO nanocomposite
under visible light irradiation. [photocatalyst] = 1500 mg L-1, initial dye concentration = 10 mg L-1
123
Polyaniline/ZnO nanocomposite 333
0.8
0.6
C/C0
0.4
no photocatalyst
123
334 A. Olad, R. Nosrati
On the basis of the experimental results obtained in this study, and in accordance
with previous reports on photocatalytic reactions of ZnO and PANI/ZnO
nanocomposite [21, 22, 27], the mechanism of photocatalytic activity of PANI/
ZnO under visible light irradiation can be predicted. Under visible light irradiation
ZnO itself is not excited and has no photocatalytic activity (Fig. 7). Visible light
absorption and photocatalytic behavior was observed when the surface of ZnO
nanoparticles was modified by PANI photosensitizer. Visible light irradiation causes
the PANI molecules to be excited and transfer electron to the conduction band of
ZnO nanoparticles (Eq. 2). Electrons in the conduction band of ZnO can reduce
molecular oxygen and produce the superoxide anion radical (Eq. 3). This radical
may form hydrogen peroxide or organic peroxides in the presence of oxygen and
organic molecules (Eqs. 4, 5, 6). Hydrogen peroxide can be generated in another
path (Eq. 7). Hydrogen peroxide can form hydroxyl radicals which are powerful
oxidizing agents (Eqs. 8, 9). The radicals produced are capable of attacking organic
pollutants with formation of intermediates which react with hydroxyl radicals to
produce the photocatalytic products (P) (Eq. 10).
PANI=ZnO þ visible light ! PANIþ =ZnO þ e
CB ð2Þ
e
CB þ O2 ! O
2 ð3Þ
H2 O þ O
2 ! OOH þ OH
ð4Þ
2OOH ! O2 þ H2 O2 ð5Þ
O
2 þ MB ! MB OO
ð6Þ
OOH þ H2 O þ e
CB ! H2 O2 þ OH
ð7Þ
H2 O2 þ e
CB
! OH þ OH
ð8Þ
H2 O2 þ O
2
! OH þ OH þ O2
ð9Þ
OH =O
2 =PANI
þ
þ MB ! intermediates ! P ð10Þ
Under UV irradiation, ZnO nanoparticles can be excited, producing photogen-
erated electron–hole pairs and achieving photocatalytic activity. Generated holes in
the valence band of ZnO can be transferred to the PANI molecules and can reach the
surface of photocatalyst where they can make contact with the dye molecules, to
cause to their degradation. Photogenerated electrons on the conduction band of ZnO
can also react with oxygen and produce superoxide anion radicals which cause
degradation of MB dye molecules. Therefore, PANI and ZnO together have a
synergetic effect on the photocatalytic behavior of each other. PANI causes a shift
in the wavelength of the light needed for excitation of ZnO nanoparticles toward the
visible light region. Also PANI causes some delay in recombination of electron–
hole pairs generated in ZnO nanoparticles and so causes an increase in the efficiency
of photocatalytic activity. In other words, by increasing the lifetime of the electron–
hole pairs, the photocatalytic efficiency of the ZnO–PANI system is also increased.
The photocatalytic degradation pathway of methylene blue under UV or visible light
123
Polyaniline/ZnO nanocomposite 335
Conclusion
123
336 A. Olad, R. Nosrati
Acknowledgments The financial support of this research by the University of Tabriz is gratefully
acknowledged.
References
1. J.H. Chen, C.Y. Cheng, W.Y. Chiu, C.F. Lee, N.Y. Liang, Eur. Polym. J. 44, 3271 (2008)
2. B.K. Sharma, A.K. Gupta, N. Khare, S.K. Dhawan, H.C. Gupta, Synth. Met. 159, 391 (2009)
3. Y. Li, J. Gong, M. McCune, G. He, Y. Deng, Synth. Met. 160, 499 (2010)
4. B.K. Sharma, A.K. Gupta, N. Khare, S.K. Dhawan, H.C. Gupta, J. Alloy Compd. 477, 370 (2009)
5. S. Ameen, M.S. Akhtar, S.G. Ansari, O.B. Yang, H.S. Shin, Superlattice Microst. 46, 872 (2009)
6. S.P. Sharma, M.V.S. Suryanarayana, A.K. Nigam, A.S. Chauhan, L.N.S. Tomar, Catal. Commun. 10,
905 (2009)
7. A.H. Gemeay, R.G. El-Sharkawy, I.A. Mansour, A.B. Zaki, J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 308, 385 (2007)
8. R. Qiu, L. Song, Y. Mo, D. Zhang, E. Brewer, React. Kinet. Catal. 94, 183 (2008)
9. D.S. Dhawale, D.P. Dubal, A.M. More, T.P. Gujar, C.D. Lokhande, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 147,
488 (2010)
10. A.A. Khan, M. Khalid, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 117, 1601 (2010)
11. X. Chen, Z. Zhou, W. Lv, T. Huang, S. Hu, Mater. Chem. Phys. 115, 258 (2009)
12. S. Sonawane, B. Neppolian, B. Teo, F. Grieser, M. Ashokkumar, J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 5148 (2010)
13. Y. Yang, Y. Chu, Y. Zhang, F. Yang, J. Liu, J. Solid State Chem. 179, 470 (2006)
14. Y. He, Powder Technol. 147, 59 (2004)
15. X. Peng, Y. Chen, F. Li, W. Zhou, Y. Hu, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 7158 (2009)
16. M. Chang, X. Cao, H. Zeng, J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 15544 (2009)
17. W. Shen, Z. Li, H. Wang, Y. Liu, Q. Guo, Y. Zhang, J. Hazard. Mater. 152, 172 (2008)
18. S. Chakrabarti, B.K. Dutta, J. Hazard. Mater. B 112, 269 (2004)
19. S. Ameen, M.S. Akhtar, Y.S. Kim, O.B. Yang, H.S. Shin, Colloid Polym. Sci. 289, 415 (2011)
20. C. Wang, X. Wang, B.Q. Xu, J. Zhao, B. Mai, P. Peng, G. Sheng, J. Fu, J. Photoch, A. Photobio,
Chem. 168, 47 (2004)
21. M.A. Behnajady, N. Modirshahla, R. Hamzavi, J. Hazard. Mater. B 133, 226 (2006)
22. R. Qiu, D. Zhang, Y. Mo, L. Song, E. Brewer, X. Huang, Y. Xiong, J. Hazard. Mater. 156, 80 (2008)
23. S. Yang, Y. Ishikawa, H. Itoh, Q. Feng, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 356, 734 (2011)
24. X. Liu, H. Wu, F. Ren, G. Qiu, M. Tang, Mater. Chem. Phys. 109, 5 (2008)
25. N.I. Kovtyukhova, A.D. Gorchinskiy, C. Waraksa, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 69–70, 424 (2000)
26. S. Mridha, D. Basak, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 142111 (2008)
27. H. Zhang, R. Zong, Y. Zhu, J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 4605 (2009)
28. J. Tschirch, R. Dillert, D. Bahnemann, B. Proft, A. Biedermann, B. Goer, Res. Chem. Intermed. 34,
381 (2008)
29. F. Ping-feng, Z. Zhuo, P. Peng, D. Xue-gang, The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering 8, 65
(2008)
30. J. Kim, W. Choi, H. Park, Res. Chem. Intermed. 36, 127 (2010)
123