Professional Documents
Culture Documents
القيمة الحجاجية لبعض المحسنات البديعية من خلال كتاب الإيضاح في علوم البلاغة للخطيب القزويني
القيمة الحجاجية لبعض المحسنات البديعية من خلال كتاب الإيضاح في علوم البلاغة للخطيب القزويني
ﱡ ﳈ ﳉ ﳊ ﳋﳌ ﳍ ﳎ ﳏ ﳐﱠ
٨٨g
ﻧﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞﱠ ﻟﻤﺎ ﺃﻋﺎﻧﻨﺎ ﻭﻭﻓﱠﻘﻨﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪ ،ﻭﰲ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺍﺿﻊ
ﻳﻌﺪ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﻄﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﺍﻫﺘﻢ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﺷﺮﺣﺎ ﳌﺨﺘﺼﺮﻩ ))ﺗﻠﺨﻴﺺ
ﺍﳌﻔﺘﺎﺡ(( ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﺗﻮﺳﻊ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﹰﺎ ﰲ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻪ ،ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻀﺒﻂ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﲢﺖ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﱪﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻭﻗﺴﻤﺎ ﺛﺎﻟﺜﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻗﺪ
ﺃﺿﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻋﺎ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ،ﳑـﱠﺎ ﺃﺛﺮﻯ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﺘﺘﻄﻮﺭ ﻭﺗﺘﺴﻊ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ
ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻨﻮﻧﺎ ﻋﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺷﻜﱠﻠﺖ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﳐﺼﻮﺻﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﺸﻒ ﺃﻏﻮﺍﺭ ﻓﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ،
ﺣﻴﺚ ﻋﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻛﻌﻠﻢ ﲢﺴﲔﹴ ﻭﺗﺰﻳﲔﹴ ،ﻳﻜﺴِﺐ ﺣﻠﱠﺔﹰ ﻟﻸﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ،ﻭﲡﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﻨﺎ ﻳﻄﻤﺢ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻮﺱ ﺍﳌﺘﻠﻘﲔ ،ﻓﻴﻤﻨﺢ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻣﻴﺰﺓ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ،ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺃﻭﻟﹰﺎ
ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺰﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﲎ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔﹰ ﺑﺎﳋﺼﻮﺹ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺍﻋﻲ ﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻫﻮ ﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ،ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﻻﺑﺪ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻧﺼﻞﹸ ﺎ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﲢﺪﻳﺪﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ
))ﺷﻜﺮﻱ ﺍﳌﺒﺨﻮﺕ(( ﺇﱃ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮﹴ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﱄ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ))ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻲ(( ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺈﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭﺍﺕ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﺔ ﰲ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻻﻻﺕ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺘﺠﻴﺐ ﺑﺪﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﳍﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺗﺸﻤﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﺪﺧﻠﹰﺎ ﻭﻭﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺸﻒ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺷﻜﺮﻱ ﺍﳌﺒﺨﻮﺕ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻪ ،ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﻧﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻭﻉ
ﰲ ﲢﻠﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻮﺍﻝ ،ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ،ﺃﻱ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻗﺎﻭﻳﻞ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺮﺍﻩ ﻳﻮﺍﻛﺐ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺳﻨﺤﺎﻭﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻗﺪﺭ
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻄﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ،
ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻄﻠﱠﺐ ﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﲑ ﻭﻓﻖ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻷﻗﺎﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﳌﻨﻈﻮﺭ ،ﻭﺣﺴﺐ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﻇﱠﻔﻨﺎ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻔﻲ ﻣﺸﻔﻮﻋﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ،ﻭﻗﺴﻤﻨﺎ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ
ﺇﱃ ﻣﺪﺧﻞﹴ ﻭﻓﺼﻠﲔﹺ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻭﺧﺎﲤﺔ.
-ﺃ-
ﻣﻘﺪﻣـﺔ
ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ :ﻭﳛﻤﻞ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ))ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭﺍﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ(( ،ﻭﺣﺎﻭﻟﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﺮﺽ
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﺮﻓﻬﺎ ،ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﺘﺒﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﳜﻲ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ
ﻭﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺃﻫﻢ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻃﺮﺃﺕ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻭﻭﺿﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﲢﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ))ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ(( ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﺟﺰﺀﺍ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎ ﻟﺒﺤﺜﻨﺎ،
ﺗﻌﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻭﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺻﻠﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻟﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻟﻐﺔﹰ ﻭﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎ ،ﻭﻋﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ
ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺗﺨﺬﻧﺎﻩ ﻛﺂﻟﻴﺔ ﻧﻌﺘﻤﺪﻫﺎ ﰲ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ :ﻓﻌﻨﻮﺍﻧﻪ ))ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ((،
ﻭﺗﻨﺎﻭﻟﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺣﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻄﺮﺍﺩ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺰﺍﻭﺟﺔ،
ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺘﺒﺎﻉ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﺎﻭﻟﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺷﻜﺎﻝ
ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻄﻴﻄﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺗﻨﺎﻭﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﺧﲑﺍ ﺧﺎﲤﺔ ﺧﺮﺟﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻮﺻﻠﻨﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪﻧﺎ ﰲ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺃﳘﱢﻬﺎ :ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻃﺒﻘﻨﺎ ﰲ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺘﻨﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ))ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ(( ﻟﻠﺨﻄﻴﺐ ﺟﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ،ﻛﻤﺎ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ )) ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻲ (( ﻟﻸﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﺍﻟﺪﻛﺘﻮﺭ
ﺷﻜﺮﻱ ﺍﳌﺒﺨﻮﺕ ،ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺙ ،ﻛﻜﺘﺎﺏ)) ﻣﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ (( ﻟﻠﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ،
ﻭ))ﺍﳌﺼﺒﺎﺡ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ(( ﻟﺒﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ
ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﲞﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻭﺍﺟﻬﺘﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻓﺘﻜﻤﻦ ﰲ ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳋﻮﺽ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﺎﻝ ،ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺃﻥﱠ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻳﺸﻜﱢﻞ ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻤﻴﺰﻩ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ
ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲡﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺸﻜﻞﹴ ﺎﺋﻲ ،ﻭﲟﺠﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺿﻨﺎ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ.
ﻭﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﰲ ﺇﲤﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺃﻭﻟﹰﺎ ،ﳋﲑ ﻋﻮﻥ ﱄ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺑﻔﻀﻠﻪ ﻭﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﻪ،
ﻭﺳﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﻭﺣﻔﻈﻪ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞﱠ ،ﰒﱠ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺳﺘﺎﺫ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿﻞ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﻃﻠﺤﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﳌﻔﻴﺪﺓ ﻭﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﺎﺗﻪ
-ﺏ-
ﻣﻘﺪﻣـﺔ
ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﱄ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﱂ ﻳﺒﺨﻞ ﻋﻠﻲ ﲜﻬﺪﻩ ﻭﻭﻗﺘﻪ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪﺗﻪ ﱄ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﰲ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺇﳒﺎﺯﻩ ،ﻓﹶﻠﹶﻪ ﻛﻞﱡ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻻ ﺃﻧﺴﻰ ﻛﻞﱠ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﻫﻢ ﻭﻟﹶﻮ ﺑﺸﻲﺀٍ
ﻗﻠﻴﻞﹴ ﰲ ﺇﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ.
-ﺝ-
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ
ﺽ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ
ﲟﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺧﺎﺻﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﻷﻛﺎﺩﳝﻲ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍﻻﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺑﻌﺮ ﹺ
ﺍﳌﻬﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﱠﻖ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ،ﺍﺭﺗﺄﻳﻨﺎ ﺃﻭﻟﹰﺎ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻧﻠﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ:
/2-1ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻟﻐـﺔﹰ:
ﻳﺼﺐ ﺍﳉﺬﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻱ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺟﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﻆ "ﺏ" "ﺩ" "ﻉ ، "ﰲ ﻛﻞﱢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﳐﺘﺮﻉ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﺎﺀ
ﰲ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ "ﺑﺪﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻳﺒﺪﻋﻪ ﺑﺪﻋﺎﹰ ﻭﺍﺑﺘﺪﻋﻪ :ﺃﻧﺸﺄﻩ ﻭﺑﺪﺃﻩ ،ﻭﺑﺪﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﻴﺔﹶ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﻄﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﺣﺪﺛﻬﺎﹶ.
ﻭﺭﻛﻲ ﺑﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻪ ﺍﳊﻔﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻉ ،ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭﻻﹰ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻨـﺰﻳﻞ ] :ﻗﻞ ﻣﺎ
ﻛﻨﺖ ﺑﺪﻋﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻞﹺ[ ،ﺃﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﹸﺭﺳﻞﹶ ،ﻗﺪ ﺃﹸﺭﺳﻞﹶ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺭﺳﻞﹲ ﻛﺜﲑ.1"
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ "ﺑﺪﻉ" ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻘﺎﺭﺑﻪ" ،ﺑﺪﻉ :ﺃﺑﺪﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﺑﺘﺪﻋﻪ:
ﺍﺧﺘﺮﻋﻪ ،ﻭﺍﺑﺘﺪﻉ ﻓﻼﻥﹲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺳﻘﺎﺀٌ ﺑﺪﻳﻊ :ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﻳﻘﹶﺎﻝﹸ :ﺃﺑﺪﻋﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺎﺏ ﺇﺫ ﺃﻛﹶﻠﹶﺖ،
ﻭﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻪ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﺟﺎﺀﺕ ﺑﺄﻣﺮﹴ ﺣﺎﺩﺙ ﺑﺪﻳﻊﹴ".2
ﻭﺬﺍ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﳑﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﳛﻤﻞﹸ ﻣﻌﺎﱐ ﺗﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﳐﺘﺮﻉ
ﻭﳏﺪﺙ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ.
-1ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ،ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﺍﻟﻨﻴﻞ -ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ ،ﺩﻁ ،ﺩﺕ ،ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺪﻉ ،ﺹ.229
- 2ﺍﻟﺰﳐﺸﺮﻱ ،ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ،ﺗﺢ :ﺑﺎﺳﻞ ﻋﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ-ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﺝ ،1ﻁ1419 ،1ﻫـ1998/ﻡ،
ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺪﻉ،ﺹ.50
-9-
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ
ﻟﻘﺪ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺗﻨﻮﻋﺎ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﹰﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﻴﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﱠﺎﺩ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﺩﱃ ﻛ ﱡﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﺪﻟﻮﻩ ﻭﺃﺷﻔﻰ ﻏﻠﻴﻠﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻠﺴﻞ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﲏ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ
ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﺓ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺧﻀﻊ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺪ ﻭﺟﺰﺭ ﰲ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﲔ ،ﺗﻜﻮﻧﺖ ﺧﻼﻝ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﻭﺭﺅﻯ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻭﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ،ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﳕﻴﺰ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺘﲔ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﺼﻄﻠﺢ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻭﳘﺎ:1
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺳﻨﻘﻒ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺓ ﳏﻄﱠﺎﺕ ﳓﺎﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺭﺻﺪ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﲑﺍﺕ ﻭﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻭﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻧﺸﺄﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻭ ﺃﻭﻝﱡ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﳌﺼﻄﻠﺤﻪ ﻇﻬﺮ ﰲ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻭﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔ ﺳﻨﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﺎﺣﻆ )ﺕ255ﻫـ( ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺃﻭﻝ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﺗﻰ ﺑﻠﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﻘﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺓ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ))ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﻴﲔ((" ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﺒﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﺆﻟﱢﻒ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﳉﻴﺪ ،ﻭﻳﺼﻨﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﻼﺕ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﻳﺆﻟﱢﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺼﺎﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻔﺔ ،ﻣﻊ
ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﺠﻴﺐﹴ ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺣﺴﻦ ﺩﻝﱟ ﻭﺇﺷﺎﺭﺓ :ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﺑﻦ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺩﺃﺏ ،ﺃﺣﺪ ﺑﲏ ﻟﻴﺚ ﺑﻦ ﺑﻜﺮ
ﻭﻛﻨﻴﺘﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ" ،2ﰒ ﺷﺮﻉ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ"،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﺒﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﺍﺀ ﳑﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳚﻤﻊ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ
ﺍﳉﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺧﺮﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ :ﻛﻠﺜﻮﻡ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﺎﰊ ،ﻭﻛﻨﻴﺘﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻇﻪ
ﻭﺣﺬﻭﻩ ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﱠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻌﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻟﱢﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻛﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺮﻱ ،ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﺃﺷﺒﺎﻫﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﺎﰊ ﳛﺘﺬﻱ ﺣﺬﻭ ﺑﺸﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻭﱂ
-1ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ،ﲨﻴﻞ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻴﺪ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﱢﻠﺴﺎﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﺼﻴﺔ ،ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﺩﻁ1998 ،ﻡ،
ﺹ.13
-2ﺍﳉﺎﺣﻆ ،ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﻴﲔ ،ﺗﺢ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ ،ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﳒﻲ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ–ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﺝ ،1ﻁ1418 ،7ﻫـ1998/ﻡ،
ﺹ.51
-10-
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ
ﻳﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﻟﱢﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﺻﻮﺏ ﺑﺪﻳﻌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺸﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺑﻦ ﻫﺮﻣﺔ" ،1ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ
ﺍﳉﺎﺣﻆ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥﱠ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻳﺼﺐ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻃﻠﻖ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻋﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺧﻄﺒﺘﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺷﻌﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻃﺒﻌﺔ ﻭﺳﺠﻴﺔ ﻭﺣﺴﻦ ﻗﻮﻝﹴ ﻣﻔﺎﺧﺮﺓ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﲜﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺗﻌﺒﲑﻩ ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﺍﺛﺘﻪ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ))ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﻴﲔ(( ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺷﻬﺐ ﺑﻦ ﺭﻣﻴﻠﺔ:
2
ﻫﻢ ﺳﺎﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻘﻰ ﺑﻪ *** ﻭﻣﺎ ﺧﲑ ﻛﻒ ﻻ ﺗﻨﻮﺀ ﺑﺴﺎﻋﺪ
ﺇﺫﹾ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺳﻌﺎ ﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﺎﺣﻆ" :ﻗﻮﻟﻪ )):ﻫﻢ ﺳﺎﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻫﺮ((
ﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺜﹶﻞﹲ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ" ،3ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﺩ ﺍﳉﺎﺣﻆ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻬﻢﹴ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﺪﻳﻪ ﰲ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ،ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻠﻪ ﻓﺎﻗﺖ ﻟﻐﺘﻬﻢ
ﻛﻞﱠ ﻟﻐﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺭﺑﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞﱢ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ.4"
ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺃﺗﻰ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰ )ﺕ296ﻫـ( ﻟﻴﺆﻟﱢﻒ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﲰﺎﻩ ))ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ(( ،ﻭﻗﺪ
ﲢﺪﺙ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻋﻲ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻗﺎﺋﻠﹰﺎ" :ﻗﺪ ﻗﺪﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻨﺎ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻭﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ
ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻭﺃﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﺪﻣﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲰﺎﻩ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻟﻴﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺑﺸﺎﺭﺍ ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎ
ﻭﺃﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﺍﺱ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﻘﻴﻠﻬﻢ ﻭﺳﻠﻚ ﺳﺒﻴﻠﻬﻢ ﱂ ﻳﺴﺒﻘﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻦ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻛﺜﺮ ﰲ ﺃﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﻓﻌﺮﹺﻑ ﰲ
ﺯﻣﺎﻢ ﺣﱴ ﺳﻤﻲ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﻓﺄﻋﺮﺏ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﺩﻝﱠ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ" ،5ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻧﻈﺮﺓﹰ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ
- 1ﺍﳉﺎﺣﻆ،ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﻴﲔ ،ﺗﺢ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ ،ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﳒﻲ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ–ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﺝ ،1ﻁ1418 ،7ﻫـ1998/ﻡ،
ﺹ.51
- 2ﺍﳉﺎﺣﻆ ،ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﻴﲔ ،ﺗﺢ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻫﺎﺭﻭﻥ ،ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﳒﻲ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ–ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﺝ ،4ﻁ1418 ،7ﻫـ1998/ﻡ،
ﺹ.55
- 3ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.55
- 4ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.56 ،55
- 5ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺗﺢ :ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻣﻄﺮﺟﻲ ،ﻣﺆ ﺳﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ1433 ،1ﻫـ2012/ﻡ،
ﺹ ) 9ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ (.
-11-
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ
ﻋﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻱ ،ﻭﻗﺴﻢ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔﹰ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔﹰ ﺃﹶﺩﺭﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﲢﺖ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ،ﺗﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ "ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﻈﺮﻩ ﻭﻫﻲ :ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺓ،
ﻭﺍﳉﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻄﺎﺑﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺭﺩ ﺃﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻣﻬﺎ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻓﻬﻮ-ﻛﻤﺎ
ﻳﻘﻮﻝ : -ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﲰﺎﻩ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺍﳉﺎﺣﻆ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ".1
ﻭﻗﺪ ﲢﺪﺙ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻨﻪ":ﻫﻮ
ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﲰﺎﻩ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺍﳉﺎﺣﻆ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻧﻲ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻠﱡﻒ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻮﺍ ﻛﺒﲑﺍ" ،2ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﻀﻤﲔ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﺝ
ﻛﻠﱡﻬﺎ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺳﺒﺎﻗﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺿﻢ ﻛﻞﱢ ﻣﺎ ﻛﹸﺘﺐ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ
ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﳏﺎﺳﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﻫﻲ":ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻔﺎﺕ ،ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻛﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻤﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻋﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﰒﱠ ﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ
ﻓﻴﺘﻤﻤﻪ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ،ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﲎ ،ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺍﳌﺪﺡ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﱠﻡ،
ﲡﺎﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﻫﺰﻝﹲ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳉﺪ ،ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﻤﲔ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﺾ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻨﺎﻳﺔ ،ﺍﻹﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ
))ﺍﳌﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ(( ،ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺒﻴﻪ ،ﺇﻋﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻋﺮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﰲ ﻭﺗﻜﻠﱡﻔﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ،ﺃﻭ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ،ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻻﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀﺍﺕ" ،3ﻟﺘﺘﻀﺢ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰ ،ﻭﻟﻌﻞﱠ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﶈﺎﻭﻟﺔ
ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻛﻌﻠﻢﹴ ﺑﻼﻏﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞﱟ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ.
ﻭﱂ ﻳﻐﺐ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﺑﻦ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ )ﺕ337ﻫـ( ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﺎ ﰲ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻪ
ﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﻪ ))ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ(( ،ﻭﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ))ﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ(( "ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ)) :ﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮ
ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ(( ﻷﰊ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﺑﻦ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻛﺘﺎﰊ)) ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ((
ﻭ))ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺜﺮ(( ﻭﺃﺣﺪ ﺭﺟﻠﲔ ﳘﺎ ﺃﻭﻝﹸ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻢ ))ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ(( ﻭﺭﺳﻢ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻭﺿﺢ ﺠﻪ،
ﻭﺃﺑﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ ﺳﺒﻴﻠﻪ" ،4ﻭﳑﺎ ﻳﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﱢﻒ ﺫﻭ ﻣﻠﻜﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺷﻐﻮﻓﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﻟﻮﺟﻮﻩ
- 1ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﻋﺘﻴﻖ ،ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﺩﻁ ،ﺩﺕ ،ﺹ.14
- 2ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺹ.69
- 3ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ،ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﻋﺘﻴﻖ ،ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺹ.15
- 4ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﺑﻦ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ،ﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ،ﺗﺢ :ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ،1
1405ﻫـ1985/ﻡ ،ﺹ)04ﻣﻘ ﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﶈﻘﱢﻖ(.
-12-
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ
ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﻋﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﳏﺎﺳﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﻭﰲ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ "ﻭﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ:
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺻﻴﻊ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺠﻊ ،ﻭﺍﺗﺴﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻥ ،ﻭﺍﺷﺘﻘﺎﻕ ﻟﻔﻆ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻔﻆ ،ﻭﻋﻜﺲ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ
ﺑﻨﺎﺀٍ ،ﻭﺗﻠﺨﻴﺺ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﺄﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺎﺭﺓ ،ﻭﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﻣﻮﻓﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻤﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﲟﻌﺎﻥ
ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺩﻟﺔ ،ﻭﺻﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺗﻠﺨﻴﺺ ﺍﻷﻭﺻﺎﻑ ﺑﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺻﻒ
ﺑﺘﻜﺮﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻒ ،ﻭﺗﻜﺎﻓﺆ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺯﻱ ،ﻭﺇﺭﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻮﺍﺣﻖ ،ﻭﲤﺜﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ" ،1ﻭﻟﻌ ﱠﻞ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﺑﻦ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﺻﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﻭﲤﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﺪ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ
ﻭﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﻴﻎ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺼﻴﺢ ﻭﺍﺗﺴﺎﻕ ﻧﻈﻤﻪ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﻧﻴﻪ ،ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻠﻪ ﺫﺍ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺑﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻣﻠﺔ .
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ )ﺕ366ﻫـ( ﻓﻘﺪ ﳓﻰ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻨﺤﻰ ﺁﺧﺮ ،ﻓﻔﻲ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻌﺮ ،ﻭﺍﺣﺘﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﺍﺀ ﺣﺬﻭﻩ ﰲ ﺷﻌﺮﻫﻢ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻣﻴﺰ ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﰲ ﺷﻌﺮ
ﺍﻷﻗﺪﻣﲔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺁﻝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﱪﻩ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪﺍ " ،ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺇﻧﻤﺎ
ﺗﻔﺎﺿﻞﹸ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻮﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺑﺸﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻭﺻﺤﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺟﺰﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻔﻆ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺗﺴﻠﱢﻢ
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﳌﻦ ﻭﺻﻒ ﻓﺄﺻﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺷﺒﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﺭﺏ ،ﻭﺑﺪﻩ ﻓﺄﻏﺰﺭ ،ﻭﳌﻦ ﻛﹶﺜﹸﺮﺕ ﺳﻮﺍﺋﺮ ﺃﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺷﻮﺍﺭﺩ
ﺃﺑﻴﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻭﱂ ﺗﻜﹸﻦ ﺗﻌﺒﺄ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺠﻨﻴﺲ ﻭﺍﳌﻄﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻭﻻ ﲢﻔﻞ ﺑﺎﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺼﻞ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ
ﻭﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﺾ".2
ﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﺗﺴﻢ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺍﻷﻗﺪﻣﲔ ﺑﺘﻤﻴﺰﻩ ﺑﺎﳉﻮﺩﺓ ﻭﲨﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻭﺣﺪﺍﺛﺘﻪ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻃﺎﺑﻌﺎ
ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪﻳﺎﹰ ﺍﺗﺼﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻨﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪ ﻭﺍﻹﻓﺮﺍﻁ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ "ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺃﻓﻀﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ،
ﻭﺭﺃﹶﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺍﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺴﻦ ،ﻭﲤﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺧﻮﺍﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺷﺎﻗﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﱡﻄﻒ ،ﺗﻜﻠﱠﻔﻮﺍ
ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺬﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﹶﺴﻤﻮﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﳏﺴﻦﹴ ﻭﻣﺴﻲﺀٍ ،ﻭﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﻭﻣﺬﻣﻮﻡﹴ ،ﻭﻣﻘﺘﺼﺪ ﻭﻣﻔﺮﻁ ،3"ﻭﱂ
ﻳﻌﻂ ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺃﳘﱢﻴﺔﹰ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺔﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻋﺎ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﺎ ﻳﱪﺭ ﻗﻠﱠﺔ ﻋﻨﺎﻳﺘﻪ
ﺎ" ،ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻨﻮﻑ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﻨﻴﺲ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻄﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ
ﻻ ﻳﺸﻐﻞ ﺑﺘﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺷﻐﻞﹶ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ،ﻭﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ،
ﻭﻳﻨﻬﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ﻭﻳﺴﻮﺀ ﲤﻴﻴﺰﻩ ،ﳑﻦ ﺍﻧﺸﻐﻠﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ
ﻭﺍﳌﻄﺎﺑﻘﺔ".1
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻵﻣﺪﻱ )ﺕ370ﻫـ( ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺬﻫﺐ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺍ ﻋﻤﺎ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ))ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺯﻧﺔ(( ﻭﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﰲ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺃﰊ ﲤﱠﺎﻡ" ،ﺃﻥﱠ ﺃﺑﺎ ﲤﱠﺎﻡ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻓﻴﺨﺮﺝ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﶈﺎﻝﹺ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﳓﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺱ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰ ﺑﺎﷲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﻋﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻬﺮﻭﻳﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻴﻪ :ﺃﻥﱠ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ :ﻣﺴﻠﻢ
ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ،ﻭﺃﻥﱠ ﺃﺑﺎ ﲤﱠﺎﻡ ﺍﺗﺒﻌﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﻓﺘﺤﻴﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻛﺄﻧﻬﻢ ﻳﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﺇﻏﺮﺍﻗﻪ ﰲ ﻃﻠﺐ
ﺍﻟﻄﱢﺒﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﻨﻴﺲ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺍﺕ ،ﻭﺇﺳﺮﺍﻓﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﺱ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺗﻮﺷﻴﺢ ﺷﻌﺮﻩ ﺎ ،ﺣﱴ ﺻﺎﺭ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﳑﺎ ﺃﺗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻢ ﻏﺮﺿﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻭﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻣﻞ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻈﱠﻦ ﻭﺍﳊﺪﺱ".2
ﻭﻧﻠﻤﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻵﻣﺪﻱ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻳﱪﺯ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﰲ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺃﰊ ﲤﱠﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﲢﻴﺮﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ
ﻭﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﺇﻳﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺷﻌﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ.
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻫﺒﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺎﱐ )ﺕ386ﻫـ( ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻭﻋﺪﻫﺎ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ
ﻭﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ :ﺍﻹﳚﺎﺯ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﺒﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺓ،
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻼﺅﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺻﻞ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﻧﺲ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺼﺮﻳﻒ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻀﻤﲔ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ ،ﻭﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ" ،3ﻭﰲ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ
ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺴﲑﻩ ،ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺠﻊ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ" ،ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺑﻼﻏﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺳﺠﺎﻉ
ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺎﱐ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺳﺠﺎﻉ ﻓﺎﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﳍﺎ" ،4ﻭ ﻟﻌﻞﱠ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ
- 1ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺳﻼﻣﺔ ،ﺑﻼﻏﺔ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻮﻧﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻷﳒﻠﻮ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ1369 ،ﻫـ1950/ﻡ ،ﺹ.240 ،239
-2ﺍﻵﻣﺪﻱ ،ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺯﻧﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺃﰊ ﲤﱠﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺘﺮﻱ ،ﺗﺢ ،ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺪ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺻﻘﺮ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﺍﻟﻨﻴﻞ -ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ ،ﺝ،3ﻁ،4
1410ﻫـ1990 /ﻡ ،ﺹ.139 ،138
- 3ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺎﱐ ،ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺖ ﰲ ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ،ﺿﻤﻦ ))ﺛﻼﺙ ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﰲ ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ(( ،ﺗﺢ :ﳏﻤﺪ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﷲ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺯﻏﻠﻮﻝ
ﺳﻼﻡ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﻁ ،3ﺩﺕ ،ﺹ.76
- 4ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.97
-14-
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺎﱐ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻟﺪﻳﻪ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺻﺪﺍ ﻹﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﰲ
ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﰊ ﻫﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺴﻜﺮﻱ )ﺕ395ﻫـ( ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ))ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﺘﲔ(( ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺩﺧﻞ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻨﻮﻧﺎ ﺑﻼﻏﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﲬﺴﺔ ﻭﺛﻼﺛﲔ ﻧﻮﻋﺎ ﺑﻼﻏﻴﺎ ﺣﺼﺮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻓﺮﺩ
ﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻼ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻷﻗﺪﻣﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﰲ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺩﺭﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺮﻭﻫﺎ ﻭﺃﻥﱠ
ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻣﺎﺀ ﱂ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮﻫﺎ؛ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳌﺎﱠ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺨﻢ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﶈﺪﺛﲔ؛ ﻷﻥﱠ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺳﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻠﱡﻒ ،ﻭﺑﺮﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻮﺏ ،ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ،ﻭﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳉﻮﺩﺓ".1
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻠﱠﺎﱐ )ﺕ 403ﻫـ( ﻓﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺑﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﲬﺴﺔ ﻭﺛﻼﺛﲔ ﻓﻨﺎ ﺑﻼﻏﻴﺎ ﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺣﻮﻝ
ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﻉ ":ﻭﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﺍ ،ﻓﺎﻗﺘﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻛﺮ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻧﺒﻬﻨﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻧﺬﻛﺮ ،ﻛﺮﺍﻫﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﻮﻳﻞ ،ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺫﻛﺮ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ".2
ﻭﲟﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻠﱠﺎﱐ ﻋﻦ ))ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ(( ،ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻷﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺫﺍ ﺃﳘﻴ ﺔ
ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﰲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ،ﻭﺑﺪﻳﻊ ﻧﻈﻤﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻪ ﻭﲤﻴﺰﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﰲ ﺧﻄﺒﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﻢ.
ﻭﰲ ﳏﺎﻭﻟﺘﻪ ﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻷﺩﻕ ﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺫﻛﺮ ﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﲑﻭﺍﱐ )ﺕ456ﻫـ( ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ
))ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺪﺓ(( ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺎ ﻟﻐﻮﻳﺎ ﺃﻭﺳﻊ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ":ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺮﺍﻉ ﻭﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ - ،ﻭﺇﻥﹾ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﳘﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ -ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺮﺍﻉ :ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﱵ ﱂ ﻳﺴﺒﻖ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻹﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﲟﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﻗﻂ ،ﻭﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﺇﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻋﺮ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻈﺮﻑ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﱂ ﲡﺮﹺ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﺓ ﲟﺜﻠﻪ ،ﰒ ﻟﺰﻣﺘﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺔ
ﺣﱴ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺪﻳﻊ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﺗﻜﺮﺭ ،ﻓﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺮﺍﻉ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﲎ ،ﻭﺍﻹﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻟﻠﱠﻔﻆ؛ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﰎﱠ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻋﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﰐ
ﲟﻌﲎ ﳐﺘﺮﻉ ﰲ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺑﺪﻳﻊﹴ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﱃ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻣﺪ ،ﻭﺣﺎﺯ ﻗﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻖﹺ".1
ﻭﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﻴﻖ ،ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﱠﻖ ﺑﺎﻹﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ،ﻟﻨﺴﻮﻕ ﻭﳔﺘﺮﻉ ﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﱐ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ.
ﻭﳌﺎﱠ ﻭﺻﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ )ﺕ471ﻫـ( ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ،
ﻭﲟﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻔﻆ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﲎ؛ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ ﰲ ))ﺃﺳﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ(( ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻨﻴﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺠﻊ ،ﻗﺎﺋﻠﹰﺎ ":ﺃﻣﺎ
))ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻨﻴﺲ(( ﻓﺈﻧﻚ ﻻ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﺴﻦ ﲡﺎﻧﺲ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻔﻈﺘﲔ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻣﻌﻨﻴﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﺎ ﲪﻴﺪﺍ،
ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﺮﻣﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻊ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺮﻣﻰ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺍ" ،2ﰒﱠ ﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻨﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﲎ
ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﺒﻴﻦ ﻟﻚ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﻄﻲ ))ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻨﻴﺲ(( ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻴﻠﺔ ،ﺃﻣﺮ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺑﻨﺼﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ،ﺇﺫﹾ ﻟﻮ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﱠﻔﻆ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﺴﻦ ،ﻭﳌﺎ ﻭﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻌﻴﺐ ﻣﺴﺘﻬﺠﻦ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺫﹸﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻜﺜﺎﺭ
ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻟﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ".3
ﻭﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﻣﻦ ﲤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺭﺍﻋﻰ ﺃﳘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻨﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﺔ
ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺧﺪﻣﺘﻪ ﳍﺎ ﻟﻘﻴﻤﺘﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻟﻠﺴﺠﻊ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻋﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﺪﻣﲔ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ "ﻭﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﺪﻣﲔ
ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﻛﻮﺍ ﻓﻀﻞﹶ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺠﻊ ،ﻭﻟﺰﻣﻮﺍ ﺳﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺒﻊ" ،4ﻭﻗﺪ ﻻﻣﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺳﺮﺍﻑ ﰲ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻹﺧﻼﻝ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ":ﻭﻗﺪ ﲡﺪ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻛﻼﻣﺎ ﲪﻞ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻪ
ﻓﺮﻁ ﺷﻐﻔﻪ ﺑﺄﻣﻮﺭ ﺗﺮﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺳﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻳﻨﺴﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﱠﻢ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻴﺒﲔ،
- 1ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﲑﻭﺍﱐ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺪﺓ ﰲ ﳏﺎﺳﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﻭﺁﺩﺍﺑﻪ ﻭﻧﻘﺪﻩ ،ﺗﺢ :ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳉﻴﻞ ،ﺳﻮﺭﻳﺎ ،ﻁ، 5
1401ﻫـ1981/ﻡ ،ﺹ.265
- 2ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ ،ﺃﺳﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ،ﺗﺢ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﻓﻬﺪ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺷﺎﻛﺮ ،ﻣﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﱐ ،ﺟﺪﺓ -ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻮﺩﻳﺔ ،ﺩﻁ ،ﺩﺕ ،ﺹ.7
- 3ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.8
- 4ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.8
-16-
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ
ﻭﻳﺨﻴﻞﹸ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲨﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺖ ﻓﻼ ﺿﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻴﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺃﻥﹾ ﻳﻮﻗﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻣﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻃﻠﺒﻪ ﰲ ﺧﺒﻂ ﻋﺸﻮﺍﺀٍ ،ﻭﺭﺑﻤﺎ ﻃﻤﺲ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﱠﻔﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻭﺃﻓﺴﺪﻩ".1
ﻭﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﳐﺸﺮﻱ )ﺕ 538ﻫـ( ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻓﺈﻧﻨﺎ ﳒﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ "ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺮﺍﺭ
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮ ﻧﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺰﳐﺸﺮﻱ ﻻ ﻳﻌﲎ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺴﲑﻩ ))ﺍﻟﻜﺸﺎﻑ(( ﲟﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺁﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺪﻳﻊ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ
ﻋﺮﺿﺎ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺪﻩ ﺫﻳﻠﹰﺎ ﳍﺎ".2
ﻭﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺰﳐﺸﺮﻱ ﱂ ﻳﻌﻂ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺔ ﺗﻀﻌﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻢ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ " ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻋﺎﻩ ﺗﻔﺴﲑﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﱐ ﰲ ))ﺍﻟﻜﺸﺎﻑ(( ﺃﻥﹾ ﻳﺸﲑ ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺓﹰ ﺧﻔﻴﻔﺔﹰ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺩ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺁﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﱢﻛﺮ
ﺍﳊﻜﻴﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺍﻟﻄﱢﺒﺎﻕ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺎﻛﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﱠﻒ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻻﻟﺘﻔﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺍﳌﺪﺡ ﲟﺎ
ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﱠﻡ ،ﻭﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﲑ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻄﺮﺍﺩ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﻳﺪ" ،3ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺿﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻛﺮ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﲡﻠﱠﻰ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﻔﺴﲑﻩ" ،ﺗﻠﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﻣﺴﺎﳘﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﳐﺸﺮﻱ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﳘﺔ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺧﺪﻣﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ،
ﲟﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﺛﺮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺑﻼﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﻭﺇﻋﺠﺎﺯﻩ".4
ﻭﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻨﻘﺬ )ﺕ584ﻫـ( ﺗﻮﺳﻊ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﻟﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ))ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ(( ،ﻭ"ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻦ ﲬﺴﺔ ﻭﺗﺴﻌﲔ ﺑﺎﺑﺎ ،ﺫﻛﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﺘﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺮﻧﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ".5
ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺮﻓﻨﺎ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﺍﺀ ﺣﺬﻭﻩ ﰲ ﺃﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﻢ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻠﱡﻒ ﰲ ﺗﻮﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺑﺪﻳﻊ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻨﻘﺬ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺩ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ" ،ﻫﺬﺍ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﲨﻌﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﺮﻕ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﺪﻣﲔ ﺍﳌﺼﻨﻔﺔ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﳏﺎﺳﻨﻪ ﻭﻋﻴﻮﺑﻪ،
ﻓﻠﻬﻢ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﺑﺘﺪﺍﻉ ،ﻭﱄ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻹﺗﺒﺎﻉ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﻗﻔﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ :ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻻﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰ ،ﻭﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﳊﺎﱄ ﻟﻠﺤﺎﲤﻲ ،ﻭﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﶈﺎﺿﺮﺓ ﻟﻠﺤﺎﲤﻲ ،ﻭﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﺘﲔ ﻟﻠﻌﺴﻜﺮﻱ ،ﻭﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻤﻊ ﻟﻠﻌﺠﻤﻲ،
ﻭﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺪﺓ ﻻﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﻴﻖ ،ﻓﺠﻤﻌﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮﺕ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻣﺜﺎﻻﺗﻪ ،ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﻛﺘﺎﰊ ﻣﻐﻨﻴﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﻟﺘﻀﻤﻨﻪ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ".1
ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺨﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ )ﺕ 606ﻫـ( ﻓﺈﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﺮﻯ ﻣﻮﻗﻔﹰﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ))ﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﳚﺎﺯ ﰲ ﺩﺭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﻋﺠﺎﺯ(( ،ﻭ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻆ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﱠﻒ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﱘ ﻭﺑﻼﻏﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﰊ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮ
ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ ))ﺩﻻﺋﻞ ﺍﻹﻋﺠﺎﺯ(( ،ﻭ))ﺃﺳﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ(( ﳏﺎﻭﻟﹰﺎ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ
ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﺋﻠﹰﺎ " :ﻭﳌـﱠﺎ ﻭﻓﱠﻘﲏ ﺍﷲ ﳌﻄﺎﻟﻌﺔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻄﺖ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ
ﻣﻌﺎﻗﺪ ﻓﻮﺍﺋﺪﳘﺎ ﻭﻣﻘﺎﺻﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﺋﺪﳘﹶﺎ ،ﻭﺭﺍﻋﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﺮ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﻭﺿﺒﻄﺖ
ﺃﻭﺍﺑﺪ ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻻﺕ ﰲ ﻛﻞﱢ ﺑﺎﺏﹴ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻴﻘﻴﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﲨﻌﺖ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻢﹺ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﻃﻨﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻤﻞﱢ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﺯ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺨﻞﱢ" ،2ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻀﻤﻨﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﳑﺎ
ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ" ،ﻭﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔﹰ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ))ﺣﺪﺍﺋﻖ ﺍﻟﺴﺤﺮ ﰲ ﺩﻗﺎﺋﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ(( ﻟﻠﻮﻃﻮﺍﻁ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﻳﻨﻘﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻤﺜﱢﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺼﻄﻠﺤﺎﺎ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ" ،3ﻭﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ" ،ﻋﺪ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺪ ﻣﻌﻈﻤﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻭﺃﻣﺜﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﻮﺍﻁ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﻩ
ﺍﳌﻄﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺰﺍﻭﺟﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻌﻨﻴﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﻣﻌﺎ" ،4ﻛﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺘﺮﻱ:
1
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻓﻠﺞ ﰊ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ *** ﺃﺻﺎﺧﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﻓﻠﺞ ﺎ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ
"ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ،ﻭﺍﻻﻟﺘﻔﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺍﻻﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻠﻤﻴﺢ" ،2ﻭﻧﻠﻤﺢ
ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺻﻨﻔﻬﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻛﺎﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﻫﺎ ﶈﺎﺳﻦ
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡﹺ" ،ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ :ﺇﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﲔ ،ﺃﻱ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﺑﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﱠﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﺪ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺟﻪ" ،3ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻠﺤﻆﹸ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﰲ ﻛﻞﱢ ﻣﺮﺓ
ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻓﻦ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﻭﺗﻮﺳﻊ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻪ ﺷﻴﺌﹰﺎ ﻓﺸﻴﺌﹰﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺮﹺﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺣﻮﻟﻪ
"ﻭﻳﻠﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ :ﲡﺎﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺖ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﺍﻹﻏﺮﺍﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻖ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺩﺓ ﻭﳎﺘﻤﻌﺔ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺸﻬﺪ
ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﺄﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻟﻠﻮﻃﻮﺍﻁ ﺳﺎﻗﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ،ﰒﱠ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺠﺐ" ،4ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﲤﺜﱠﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﻮﺍﻁﹸ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﺍﺀ:
5
ﺃﻳﺎ ﴰﻌﺎ ﻳﻀﻲﺀ ﺑﻼ ﺍﻧﻄﻔﺎﺀ *** ﻭﻳﺎ ﺑﺪﺭﺍ ﻳﻠﻮﺡ ﺑﻼ ﳏﺎﻕ
ﻓﺄﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺭ ،ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺻﻲ؟ *** ﻭﺃﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﻊ ،ﻣﺎ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻗﻲ؟
6
"ﻭﺃﺧﲑﺍﹰ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻊ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲤﺜﱠﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﻮﺍﻁﹸ".
ﻭﺑﻮﺻﻮﻟﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ )ﺕ 626ﻫـ( ﺩﺧﻞ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺍ ،ﻭﺷﻬﺪﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﻛﻜ ﱟﻞ
ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ،ﻟﻴﺨﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ ﻭﻣﻦ
ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ))ﻣﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ(( ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﻮﻳﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ،
"ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺴﻤﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ،ﲢﺪﺙ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﻑ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ
- 1ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺘﺮﻱ ،ﺗﺢ :ﺣﺴﻦ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﰲ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﻡ ،2ﻁ ،3ﺩﺕ ،ﺹ.844
- 2ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﻋﺘﻴﻖ ،ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺹ.38
- 3ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.40
- 4ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ40
- 5ﻓﺨﺮ ﺍﻟ ﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ ،ﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﳚﺎﺯ ﰲ ﺩﺭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﻋﺠﺎﺯ ،ﺹ.116
- 6ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﻋﺘﻴﻖ ،ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺹ.40
-19-
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺷﺘﻘﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﻭﺍﻷﻛﱪ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻞﹶ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻮ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﻟﺚ ﻓﺨﺺ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺃﳊﻖ ﻤﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﺎﺣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺤﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻔﻈﻴﺔ
ﻭﺍﳌﻌﻨﻮﻳﺔ".1
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻬﻤﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻤﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﺤﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻑ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﳐﺼﻮﺻﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﺎﺭ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻟﻘﺼﺪ ﲢﺴﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ".2
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ﻟﻔﻈﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻌﻨﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﱂ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﻩ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ،ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺒﻌﺜﺮﺓ
ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﲔ ،ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﺒﺎﻗﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻮﻳﺔ
ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻲ" :ﺍﳌﻄﺎﺑﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺎﻛﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﲑ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺰﺍﻭﺟﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﱠﻒ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ،
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻖ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻖ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ،
ﻭﺍﻹﻳﻬﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺍﳌﺪﺡ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﱠﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺳﻮﻕ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻣﺴﺎﻕ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻭﲡﺎﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﻑ،
ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺘﺒﺎﻉ ،ﰒ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ،ﻭﺍﻻﻟﺘﻔﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺍﻹﳚﺎﺯ ﻭﺍﻹﻃﻨﺎﺏ" ،3ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻔﻈﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﻓﻬﻲ" :ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻨﻴﺲ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺷﺘﻘﺎﻕ ،ﻭﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺠﻊ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﺻﻴﻊ" ،4ﺃﻣﺎ
ﻣﺎ ﳜﺺ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻣﺮ ﱂ ﻳﺴﺒﻖ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﺣﺪ ،ﻭ"ﻻ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﺣﺪﺍ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﺔ
ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﺎﺣﺔ ﺍﻷﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻓﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻧﺮﻯ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ
ﻭﻻ ﺩﺭﺍﻳﺔ ،ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﺗﻔﺼﻞ ﻛﻞﱠ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺴﻤﻴﻪ".5
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ )ﺕ686ﻫـ( ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻟﱠﻒ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ))ﺍﳌﺼﺒﺎﺡ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ((
ﻭﻫﻮ ﲟﺜﺎﺑﺔ ﺗﻠﺨﻴﺺ ﳌﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ))ﻣﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ(( ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﻗﺴﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﺸﻜﻞﹴ ﺁﺧﺮ،
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ" :ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ :ﻓﺎﻷﻭﻝ:ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﺯ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﻟﺘﻤﺎﻡ
- 1ﺷﻮﻗﻲ ﺿﻴﻒ ،ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﻭﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﺍﻟﻨﻴﻞ -ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ ،ﻁ ،9ﺩﺕ ،ﺹ.287
- 2ﺍﻟ
ﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ ،ﻣﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ،ﺗﺢ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪ ﻫﻨﺪﺍﻭﻱ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ1420 ،1ﻫـ2000/ﻡ،
ﺹ.21
- 3ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ،ﺷﻮﻗﻲ ﺿﻴﻒ ،ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﻭﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ،ﺹ .313 ،312
- 4ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ،ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.313
- 5ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ ،ﻣﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ،ﺹ) ،21ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﶈﻘﱢﻖ(.
-20-
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ
ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ،ﻭﰲ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﱠﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻴﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ :ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﺯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﳑﺎ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺍﻓﻴﺔ ﺑﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ
ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺧﻔﺎﺋﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﻟﺚ :ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﺎﺣﺔ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ".1
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻓﹰﺎ ﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﺎﺣﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺗﺘﺄﻟﱠﻒ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ:
"ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺗﻮﺍﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﺎﺣﺔ".2
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﲤﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺭﺟﻌﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﺎﺣﺔ" ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﺎ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﲰﺎﻩ ))ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ(( ،ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﻟﺘﺼﺒﺢ ﻣﺘﻀﻤﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻮﻣﺎ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ:
ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ".3
ﻭﲟﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺻﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺧﻼﻓﹰﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺣﺼﺮ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻋﻪ" ،ﻭﻟﻌﻞﱠ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺷﻲﺀ ﲤﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻮﺳﻊ ﺑﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﰲ
ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻭﲬﺴﲔ ﻧﻮﻋﺎ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﲔ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺳﺘﺔ
ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ" ،4ﻭﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﺑﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺇﱃ
ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﺎﺣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺟﻌﻞ ﰲ ﻛﻞﱢ ﻓﺼﻞﹴ ﻗﺴﻤﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ "ﺇﻣﺎ ﺭﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﺎﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻔﻈﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺭﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﺇﻣﺎ ﳐﺘﺼﺔ ﺑﺎﻹﻓﻬﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﻴﲔ ،ﻭﺇﻣﺎ
ﳐﺘﺼﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺰﻳﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﺴﲔ".5
ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﺝ ﲢﺖ ﻛﻞﱢ ﻗﺴﻢ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ "ﻗﺴﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻓﻬﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺒﻴﲔ،
ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺘﻤﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﺱ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺬﻳﻴﻞ ،ﻭﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﻳﺪ،
- 1ﺑﺪﺭ ﺍﻟ ﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﺍﳌﺼﺒﺎﺡ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻁ1409 ،1ﻫـ1989/ﻡ ،ﺹ) ،5 ،4ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ(.
- 2ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.159
- 3ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﻋﺘﻴﻖ ،ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺹ.54
- 4ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.54
- 5ﺑﺪﺭ ﺍﻟ ﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ،ﺍﳌﺼﺒﺎﺡ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺹ.161
-21-
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ
ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺎﻟﻐﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺴﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻳﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﺴﲔ ﻣﺜﻞ :ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻖ" ،1ﻭﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺛﺎﻟﺜﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ.
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ )ﺕ792ﻫـ( ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﺎ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ))ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻬﺎﺕ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ(( ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺴﻤﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ،ﺟﻌﻞ ﰲ ﻛﻞﱢ ﻗﺴﻢﹴ
ﻓﻨﺎ ﺃﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻑ ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﲢﺴﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﱡﻖ ،ﻣﻊ
ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ".2
ﻭﺑﺪﺍ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻏﻤﻮﺽ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ ﺷﺮﺡ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﰲ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﻗﹸﻠﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻌﺾ ،ﻟﻴﺨﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺴﲔ ﻻ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ،
ﻛﺎﻟﺘﺤﺴﻴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﱡﻖ؛ ﻣﻊ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺔ
ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﻊ ﻋﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺻﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻨﺎﻋﱵ
ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺻﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺶ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺟﺔ".3
ﻭﻧﻠﺤﻆ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﲡﻠﱠﻰ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ ﺑﺄﺩﻕ ﺩﻗﺎﺋﻘﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳌـﱠﺎ ﺭﺑﻄﻪ
ﺑﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﱢﻞ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻠﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ.
ﻭﻣﻊ ﻗﺪﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ )ﺕ739ﻫـ( ﻭﺟﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻮﻓﱠﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻬﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ
ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ،ﺇﺫﹾ ﺳﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻄﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻪ ﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑﻪ ))ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ((
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﰲ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺘﻪ" :ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﻭﺗﻮﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ؛ ﺗﺮﲨﺘﻪ ﺑـ))ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ(( ﻭﺟﻌﻠﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﳐﺘﺼﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲰﻴﺘﻪ ))ﺗﻠﺨﻴﺺ
ﺍﳌﻔﺘﺎﺡ(( ،ﻭﺑﺴﻄﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻟﻪ؛ ﻓﺄﻭﺿﺤﺖ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻌﻪ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻓﺼﻠﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻴﻪ
ﺍﻤﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻤﺪﺕ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻼ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﺮ ،ﳑـﱠﺎ ﺗﻀﻤﻨﻪ ))ﻣﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ((".1
ﻭﰲ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋﺮﻑ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﲢﺴﲔ
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺔ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﻩ ﺿﺮﺑﺎﻥ :ﺿﺮﺏ
ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ،ﻭﺿﺮﺏ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻔﻆ".2
ﻭﺣﺴﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻟﻠﻤﺤﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻟﻔﻈﻴﺔ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻳﺔ" ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳚﺮﻱ ﰲ ﺇﺛ ﹺﺮ
ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ ،ﻭﺗﻮﺳﻊ ﰲ ﻋﺮﺿﻬﺎ ﻭﺳﺮﺩ ﺃﻟﻮﺍﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻌﻞﱠ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ
ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻪ ﺑﺎﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺳﺎﻕ ﰲ ﺃﻟﻮﺍﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﺛﻼﺛﲔ ﻟﻮﻧﺎ ﻭﺳﺎﻕ ﰲ ﺃﻟﻮﺍﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻔﻈﻴﺔ
ﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﻟﻮﺍﻥ".3
ﻭﻟﻌﻞﱠ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﺳﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺎﻛﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ ﰲ ﻧﻈﺮﺗﻪ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ
ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻱ ﻟﻪ"،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﺍﻻﺗﺠﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﺪﺃﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ ﲜﻌﻞ
ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻭﺟﻮﻫﺎ ﻟﺘﺤﺴﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﺍﺻﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺪﺃﻩ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﲜﻌﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻭﻗﺴﻤﺎ
ﺛﺎﻟﺜﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ" ،4ﻏﲑ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳎﺪﺩﺍ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ،ﻓﺎﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ ﲜﻌﻞ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻠﺤﻘﹰﺎ ﻟﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ،ﻭ"ﻓﹶﺼﻞﹶ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻓﺼﻠﹰﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﹰﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺧﻮﻳﻪ
ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ،ﻭﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﺒﻌﻪ ﳏﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ
ﻓﺼﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻢ ﲢﺴﲔ ﻭﺗﺰﻳﲔ" ،5ﻟﻴﻜﺘﻤﻞ ﻭﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻛﻤﺒﺤﺚ ﻭﻋﻠﻢﹴ ﳝﺜﱢﻞ ﺟﺰﺀﺍ ﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻨﺼﺮﺍ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻐﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻲ.
1
-ﺟﻼﻝ ﺍﻟ ﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ،ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ1424 ،1ﻫـ2003/ﻡ،
ﺹ) 11ﻣﻘ ﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ(.
- 2ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.255
- 3ﺷﻮﻗﻲ ﺿﻴﻒ ،ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﻭﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ،ﺹ.347
- 4ﺷﻜﺮﻱ ﺍﳌﺒﺨﻮﺕ ،ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻲ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ2006 ،ﻡ ،ﺹ.95
- 5ﺑﺴﻴﻮﱐ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻓﻴﻮﺩ ،ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ))ﺩﺭﺍﺳﻴﺔ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﻴﺔ ﻭﻓﻨﻴﺔ ﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ(( ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺣﺴﺎﺀ
ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ -ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﻁ1418 ،2ﻫـ1998/ﻡ ،ﺹ.113
-23-
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭﺻﻠﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﳌﻨﻄﻖ:
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎ
ﺟﺎﺀ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻄﺮﺣﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﺮﻛﱠﺐ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺯﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﻌﺎﻝ" ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝﱠ ،ﺃﻱ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﱠﺮﻳﻖ
ﺍﳌﺮﺷﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭﻓﻖ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﱄ ﻫﻮ ﺩﻟﻴﻞﹲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﱠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ
ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻭﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﱠﻖ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻓﺈﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﻠﺐ
ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻞ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﳌﺴﺆﻭﻝ ﺑﺈﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻓﺎﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺇﺫﻥﹾ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻝﱢ ،ﻭﻫﻮ
ﻃﻠﺐ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ،ﻣﻦ ﺟﹺﻬﺔ ﻏﲑﻩ ﲞﻼﻑ ﻣﺪﻟﻮﻝ )ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ( ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻃﻠﺐ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺟﹺﻬﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﺟﹺﻬﺔ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻋﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﺃﴰﻞﹸ" ،1ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺎﻥ ﺎ ﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻭﺟﻬﺔﹶ ﻧﻈﺮﹴ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﺩﻟﻴﻠﹰﺎ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺎ ﻭﺑﺮﻫﺎﻧﺎ ﻳﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ
ﻏﺮﺽﹴ ﻣﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻳﻘﻮﺩﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻬﻢﹴ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﱠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ" ،ﻓﺈﻥﱠ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ
ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔﹰ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺁﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ،ﻭﲣﺮﻳﺞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ،ﻭﻭﻓﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﹰﺎ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻟﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺑﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﺒﻨﻴﺔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻫﲔ ﻭﺣﺠﺞ ﻣﺆﻳﺪﺓ ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﻞ ،ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻻﻗﻨﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺻﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻴﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺿﺒﻂ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ" ،2ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺘﻀﺢ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﻳﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﱢﻫﻦ ﻟﻴﺼﻞﹶ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻜﹾﻢﹴ
ﻣﺎ،ﻭ"ﻫﻨﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺃﻥﹾ ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻭﺇﱃ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﻪ
-1ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺫﺍﻛﺮ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ،ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭﳎﺎﻻﺗﻪ ،ﳎﻠﱠﺔ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ،ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳌﻠﻚ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ،
ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺖ ،ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ2011 ،02ﻡ ،ﺹ.74
- 2ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.75 ،74
-25-
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
))ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ((ROBERTﰲ ﺃﻭﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﹺ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ)ﻧﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻭﻓﻘﹰﺎ ﳌﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ،ﻣﻦ
ﺣﻜﻢﹴ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﻠﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ،(ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻳﻀﻴﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ)،ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ
ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ ﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺑﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ.1"(
ﻭﲟﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻁﹲ ﺫﻫﲏ ﻳﻨﻄﻠﻖ ﺑﺪﺀًﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﻭﻣﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ
ﻳﺴﺘﻨﺒﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﺎ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ،ﻓﹶﻠﹶﺎﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻘﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻟﻴﺒﲏ ﻣﻦ
ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﻀﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ،ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ "ﻗﻮﻟﹰﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ
ﻟﺰﻡ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺮﺩ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ" ،2ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﻜﱢﻞ ﻋﻼﻗﺔﹰ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔﹰ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻧﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﻌﲔ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﹰﺎ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﹰﺎ ،ﻭﺬﺍ ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﻫﺎﺗﻪ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﹰﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻧﺎ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺎ" ،ﻓﺎﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔﹲ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺔﹲ ﻳﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻣﺴﻠﱠﻢ
ﺑﺼﺤﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻧﺎﲡﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥﹸ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓﹰ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ
ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻃﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺋﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺀ ،ﺃﻭ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ
ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﹰﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺍ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺘﲔ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﹰﺎ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻴﺎ" ،3ﻭﻣﺠﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞﱢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔﹲ
ﺃﻭ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔﹲ ﺗﻨﻄﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺻﻮﻟﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ،ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﲟﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ.
ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺗﺘﺒﻨﻰ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﻼﻕ ﻣﻦ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﺘﱪﻫﺎ
ﻛﻤﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﺣﻜﻢﹴ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ ﲟﺜﺎﺑﺔ ﺃﺩﻟﱠﺔ ﻧﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ،
ﻭﺬﺍ ﻓﺎﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺗﺪﺭﺝ" ﻳﻮﺻﻠﻨﺎ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻟﺔ ﻭﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻛﻤﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ،ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻟﺪﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻧﻌﺮﺿﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺇﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﺎ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺻﺪﻗﻬﺎ"،4
ﻟﺬﺍ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻧﻘﻮﻡ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﺑﺘﻘﻮﱘ ﺻﺤﺔ ﻭﺳﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
- 1ﺭﻭﺑﲑ ﺑﻼﻧﺸﻲ ،ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﺗﺮ :ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻴﻌﻘﻮﰊ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ،ﺩﻁ1424 ،ﻫـ2003/ﻡ ،ﺹ.03
- 2ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.9
- 3ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺫﺍﻛﺮ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ،ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭ ﳎﺎﻻﺗﻪ ،ﺹ.75
- 4ﺭﻭﺑﲑ ﺑﻼﻧﺸﻲ ،ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﺹ.71
-26-
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻛﹶﻤﺴﻠﱠﻤﺔ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ "ﲟﻄﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻀﺎﻣﻴﻨﻪ" ،1ﻷﻧﻨﺎ ﺑﹺﺼﺪﺩ ﺇﺛﺒﺎ
ﺕ
ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝﹺ ﺣﻜﻢﹴ ﺛﺎﻥ ،ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﻧﺎﺗﺞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﺪﻟﻮﻝ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﺎﺑﻊﹴ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻧﺺ،
ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥﹸ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ" ﻧﺼﺎ ﺣﺎﻣﻠﹰﺎ ﳌﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﳐﺼﻮﺹﹴ ،ﻭﺃﻥﱠ ﻛﻞﱠ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﻣﺒﲏ ﺑﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻣﺼﻮﻍ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺎﺕ ﳏﺪﺩﺓ ،ﲝﻴﺚ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺄﺗﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻀﻤﻮﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻌﻴﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﻨﺺ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺃﹸﺣﻴﻂﹶ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻀﻤﻮﻧﻴﺔ"،2
ﻭﺬﺍ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥﱠ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﲢﻤﻞ ﰲ ﻃﻴﺎﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺩﻻﻻﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭ ﻣﻀﺎﻣﲔ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﻧﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻭ ﺁﻟﻴﺎﺕ ،ﺪﻑ ﲢﺪﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﻹﺣﺎﻃﺔ ﺎ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻣﺎ
ﳚﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﻭﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻀﺎﻣﲔ ،ﻭﺗﻌﺮﻑ"ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺠﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻀﺎﻣﲔ ﺑـ )ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ( ﺃﻭ )ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴﺔ(
ﺃﻭ )ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺘﻴﺔ(" ،3ﻭﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﻨﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻧﺒﲏ ﺑﻪ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﺎ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺗﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﲞﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺃﳘﱡﻬﺎ ﺛﻼﺙ "ﻭﻫﻲ):ﺧﺎﺻﻴﺔ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ
ﻭﺍﳌﻀﻤﻮﻥ( ﻭ)ﺧﺎﺻﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻄﺎﻕ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﰲ( ﻭ)ﺧﺎﺻﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺭﺝ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺗﺐ(" ،4ﻭﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﻨﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﺗﺘﺠﻠﱠﻰ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻜﻢ
ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺧﻼﻟﻪ ﺩﻻﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﻟﻠﻨﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻪ
ﻭﻣﻀﻤﻮﻧﻪ ،ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﳏﻤﻮﻟﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﺘﺸﻜﱢﻞ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻟﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺪﺭﺝ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ
ﻛﺤﻜﻢﹴ ﺑﻨﺎﺋﻲ ﺎﺋﻲ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺤﺪﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ
"ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺿﺮﻭﺏ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﱠﺔ ﻫﻲ) :ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ( ﻭ)ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﻴﻞ( ﻭ)ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺀ(" ،5ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻬﺘﻢ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﱡﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺑﻨﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻦ "ﺷﻜﻞﹴ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻟﺘﻘﺪﱘ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﲢﺪﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﻴﻤﻬﺎ
- 1ﻃﻪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ،ﲡﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﰲ ﺗﻘﻮﱘ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺙ ،ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﻘﺎﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ ،2ﺩﺕ ،ﺹ.23
- 2ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.23
- 3ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.23
- 4ﻃﻪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ،ﺍﻟﱢﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ ،ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﻘﺎﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ1998 ،1ﻡ ،ﺹ.35
- 5ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.38
-27-
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ" ،1ﻟﺬﺍ ﺗﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻔﺎﻅ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲤﺎﺳﻚ ﺑﲎ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ" ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻬﻤﻨﺎ ﳓﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﻛﱢﺪ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻟﻠﻨﺺ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﳋﺎﺹ ﻭﺑﻨﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻳﺆﻛﱢﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺴﺘﻌﻤﻠﻪ ﰲ ﺧﻄﺎﺑﺎﺗﻨﺎ ﻭﺣﻮﺍﺭﺍﺗﻨﺎ ،ﻣﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ) :ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ(،
)ﻣﺘﲔ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ() ،ﻧﺎﺻﻊ ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ() ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻼﻥ ،ﻻ ﻳﻌﻘﻞ ﺻﺤﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞﹲ(،
)ﻫﺬﻩ ﺃﺩﻟﱠﺔﹲ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﺿﺔﹲ ﻭﺣﺠﺞ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﻀﺔﹲ() ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﻮﻝﹲ ﻣﺮﺩﻭﺩ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺪ ،ﻭﺍﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ() ،ﻓﹸﻼﻥﹲ
ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞﹺ ﻭﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ( ،ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺑﲑ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺸﺎﺭ ﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻲ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﱄ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ".2
ﻭﻳﺘﺒﻴﻦ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﻄﻖ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ
ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺻﺢ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺤﺠﺔ ﻭﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻘﻮﺩﻧﺎ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻳﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻮﺎ ﻃﺮﻕ ﻋﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻭﺁﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻋﺔ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ
ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺇﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺎﺗﻪ "ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﲣﺘﺺ ﺑﻜﻮﺎ ﺗﻘﺒﻞ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﱡﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻘﻞﹴ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ
ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻝ ﺑﲔ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺣﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻭﺃﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ،ﺣﱴ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﰲ
ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻳﻨﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﻭﻭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﳜﺮﺟﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻠﺤﻘﻬﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻮﻧﺎﺕ ﺣﻘﻠﻴﺔ ،3"ﻷﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻹﻓﻬﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺘﻨﺎ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻭﺇﻧﺘﺎﺟﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎﺋﻲ
ﺍﳌﻌﺮﰲ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ "ﻻ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﻓﻬﻤﻪ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻔﻬﻴﻤﻪ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻬﻴﻢ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺗﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﺄﺻﻮﻝ ﻭﻓﺼﻮﻝ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺎﺕ" ،4ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺮﺗﺐ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳋﻮﺽ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺓ ﺁﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﰲ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﻮﺽ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺓ ﳎﺎﻻﺕ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﺨﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﺴﻠﻜﹰﺎ ﳍﺎ ﰲ ﺑﻠﻮﻍ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﺎ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻣﻠﹰﺎ ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻋﺪﺓ ﺗﺴﲑ ﻭﻓﻘﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻳﺘﺤﺘﻢ ﻋﻨﻪ "ﺗﺸﺎﺑﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ
- 1ﺃﻧﺪﺭﻳﻪ ﺟﺎﻙ ﺩﻳﺸﲔ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﻭﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ،ﺗﺮ :ﻫﻴﺜﻢ ﻟﹶﻤﻊ ،ﺍﳌﺆ ﺳﺴﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﺩﻁ ،ﺩﺕ،
ﺹ.25
- 2ﺃﺑﻮﺑﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﺍﻭﻱ ،ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ،ﻣﺆ ﺳﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﱢﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ2010 ،1ﻡ،
ﺹ.18
- 3ﻃﻪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ ،ﲡﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﰲ ﺗﻘﻮﱘ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺙ ،ﺹ.82
- 4ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.82
-28-
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺎﳌﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺗﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻴﺔ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺣﺚ
ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺻﻮﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ" ،1ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺠﺎ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳﺎ ﰲ
ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻘﺎﺻﺪ ﻛﻞﱢ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻞ ﻭﺣﺘﻤﻴﺎ ﰲ ﺑﻠﻮﻍ ﻣﻜﺎﺳﺐ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺣﱴ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺻﻞ
ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺼﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻀﻊ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﰲ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺷﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻭﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ
ﻭﻋﺎﻣﺔ" ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻋﻢ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻥﹾ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺔ ﺧﺎﺻﻴﺔ ﺇﺿﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺗﻠﺤﻖ ﻛﻞ ﻋﻠﻢﹴ ﻳﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﰲ
ﲢﺼﻴﻞ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞﱠ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺩﺧﻞ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺁﺧﺮ ﲟﻨـﺰﻟﺔ ﺁﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻻﺗﻪ" ،2ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﻄﻲ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ
ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﰲ ﻛﻞﱢ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺛﺮﺍﺀ ﳌﻌﺎﺭﻓﻪ ﺇﻧﺘﺎﺟﺎ ﻭﲢﺼﻴﻠﹰﺎ .
ﻭﻧﻈﺮﺍ ﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﰲ ﺗﺒﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻟﻪ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﳛﻞﱡ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﳏﻞﱠ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ،
"ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺑـ )ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ( ،ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﱡﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ" ،3ﻭﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺗﺴﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ ﺃﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﺸﻜﱢﻞ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺎﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻳﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ
ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝﹴ ﻣﺴﻠﱠﻢ ﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﺔ" ،4ﻟﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﻫﺎ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﰲ ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀﺍﺗﻪ ،ﻭ "ﺗﺸﻤﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺙ ﻛﻞﱠ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻻﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ
ﰲ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻻﺕ".5
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺈﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺣﻜﻢﹴ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺭﺑﻄﻬﺎ ﺑﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺩﻟﱠﺔ ﻭﺑﺮﺍﻫﲔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﻪ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺎ
ﻓﺎﳌﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﻫﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥﹾ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﻟﻴﺠﻮﺯ ﻭﻳﺼﺢ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﺎ ﻛﺤﺠﺔ ،ﻓﺎﳊﺠﺔ
"ﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﺳﻤﻴﺖ ﺣﺠﺔﹰ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺤﺘﺞ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﺼﻢ ﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ،ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﹰﺎ ﻷﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ،ﻭﻴﺌﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﻷﺟﻞﹺ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﹰﺎ" ،6ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ
ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺲ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺗﺴﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ،ﻓﻴﺘﺒﻴﻦ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ
ﺑﺎﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺎﺝ ،ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﻋﻼﺋﻘﻴﺎ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺁﻟﻴﺔﹰ ﻟﻪ
ﲢﻤﻞ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻭﺍﳍﺪﻑ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﻗﻨﺎﻉ ،ﻭﻳﺘﺠﻠﱠﻰ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﻞﱢ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺸﺘﻐﻞ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺎﻻﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻧﻪ ﺁﻟﻴﺔﹲ ﺗﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻧﺘﺎﺝ
ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻛﺎﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻭﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﰲ ﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺻﻞ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﳌﺪﻯ ﺩﻗﱠﺔ
ﻭﺻﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﲞﺼﻮﺹ ﺃﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﺴﻢ ﺑﻪ،
ﻫﻮ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺘﺸﻜﱠﻞ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻭﺯﻭﺍﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﺓ
ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲡﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ.
/2-2ﺻﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﳌﻨﻄﻖ:
ﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﺪﺃﺕ ﺗﺘﻀﺢ ﺍﳌﻼﻣﺢ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﻄﻖ ﻣﻊ
ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ،ﺣﻴﺚ "ﺍﻋﺘﱪ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ
ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻟﱠﻒ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺑﻮﺻﻔﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺎ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﲝﻮﺛﻪ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ )) ﺍﻷﺭﻏﺎﻧﻮﻥ ((
ﺃﻱ )ﺁﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ( ،ﻗﺪﻡ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺼﻨﻒ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻜﻮﻥﹶ ﻣﻦ ﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻛﺘﺐ ﲨﻊ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﻞﱠ
ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ".1
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲣﺘﺺ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ " ﺁﻟﺔ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻴﺔ ﺗﻌﺼﻢ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﱢﻫﻦ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ" ،2ﺃﻣﺎ ﲞﺼﻮﺹ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭﰲ ﲢﻘﻴﻘﻪ ﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻭﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺻﺎﺋﺒﺔ" ،ﺃﻥﱠ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﹶﻢ ﻟﻄﹸﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺑﺎﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﻃﺮﻕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﱡﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺮﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ
ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻛﻨﺎ ﻧﻌﺒﺮ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﺲ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻟﻐﺮﺽ
1
-ﺣﺴﻦ ﺑﺸﲑ ﺻﺎﱀ ،ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﻼﺳﻔﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﻓﺎﺀ ﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﱢﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ،ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ-ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﻁ،1
2003ﻡ ،ﺹ.44
- 2ﳏﻤﺪ ﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﳌﻈﻔﺮ ،ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻟﻠﻤﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ،ﺩﻁ1427 ،ﻫـ2006/ﻡ ،ﺹ.12
-30-
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻬﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻬﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺪﻳﻘﻴﺔ ﻓﺈﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ" ،1ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﺸﻒ
ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻭﻣﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ،ﻭﻳﺸﻜﱢﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ
ﻋﻨﺼﺮﺍ ﻗﻮﻳﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ" ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ)(Raisonnement
ﻣﺼﻄﻠﺢ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﻠﻪ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﻃﻦ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ )) ﺍﻷﺭﻏﺎﻧﻮﻥ (( ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻪ ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺪﻣﻪ ﻟﻠﻘﻴﺎﺱ) (syllogismeﻳﺼﺪﻕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻔﻴﺪﻩ
ﻣﺼﻄﻠﺢ )ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ( ﻋﻨﺪﻩ -ﺣﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﻔﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ -ﻭﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻔﻴﺪﻩ
ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻠﺢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ" ،2ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳒﺪﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﻼﻧﺸﻲ ﺣﻴﺚ "ﺍﻧﻄﻠﻖ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻠﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ )ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ( ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ...ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺫﻫﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ
) (Discursiveﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺗﺮﺑﻂ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ
ﺑﺎﻟﺜﱠﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻫﻲ )ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ( ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ) (Inférenceﻭﻫﻲ )ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺑﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ("،3
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻗﺪ ﻻ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻨﺎ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺎ ﻭﻳﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻛﻤﺜﺎﻝﹴ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ":ﻟﻮ ﻛﻨﺎ ﳒﻬﻞ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ﻳﺒﻴﺾ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻠﺪ ﻓﺈﻥﱠ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﺠﻮﺍﺏ
ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺗﻨﺎ ﰒﱠ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺒﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺗﻨﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻛﻞﱠ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﺒﻴﺾ ،ﻭﺃﻥﱠ ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥﹲ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ
ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻧﺸﻜﱢﻞ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﺎ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻛﻞﱡ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﺒﻴﺾ ﻓﺎﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺯﻳﺪﺍ ﻳﺒﻴﺾ،
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻓﺎﺳﺪﺓﹲ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻓﺴﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﲑ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥﱠ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﲑ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﻭﻓﻘﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻲ ،ﻓﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﻧﺸﺄ ﻋﻦ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﻧﻴﺔ" ،4ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﲑ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻣﻊ ﺷﺮﻭﻁ ﺻﺪﻕ ﻭﺻﺤﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﺸﻜﱠﻞ ﲟﻘﺘﻀﺎﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ،ﻭﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﻨﺎ
ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﻊ ﺑﺪﺍﻳﺔﹰ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺗﻨﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺸﺘﺮﻁ ﺻﺤﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺳﻼﻣﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ
ﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﻄﺄ ﰲ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺘﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ" ،ﻓﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﱢﻢ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﲑ،
- 1ﳏ ﻤﺪ ﺻﻨﻘﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻲ ،ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﺋ ﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﱢﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ-ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ،ﻁ1435،1ﻫـ2013/ﻡ،
ﺹ.25
- 2ﻫﺸﺎﻡ ﺍﻟ ﺮﻳﻔﻲ ،ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ،ﺿﻤﻦ ))ﺃﻫ ﻢ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ(( ،ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ:
ﲪﺎﺩﻱ ﺻ ﻤﻮﺩ ،ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺮﲰﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻬﻮﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻧﺴﻴﺔ ،ﺩﻁ ،ﺩﺕ ،ﺹ.99
- 3ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ،ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.100 ،99
- 4ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻨﻘﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻲ ،ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﺹ.19 ،18
-31-
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺑﻞ ﻳﺮﺷﺪﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﲑ" ،1ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻳﺘﺒﻌﻪ ﺧﻄﺄ ﻭﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ " ،ﻓﻘﺪ
ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﹺ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﲑ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﻃﺌﺔ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ
ﺗﻔﻜﲑﻩ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺌﺔ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ" ،2ﻟﺬﺍ
ﻳﺘﻌﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻻﺗﻨﺎ ﻭﺗﻔﻜﲑﻧﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺗﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻗﺎﻟﺐﹴ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺳﻠﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ "ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﺳﺲ
ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻔﱠﻞﹸ ﺑﺘﻨﻘﻴﺤﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﻓﺎﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻤﻮﻥ ﻛﻞﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﺄﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻴﻢ؛ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺇﻥﱠ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻫﻮ ﺧﺎﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ".3
ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺎﻻﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺇﻧﺘﺎﺝﹴ ﻭﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻭﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ
ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ،ﻭ"ﳕﻮﺫﺝ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺎﺕ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺘﻪ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳍﻨﺪﺳﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﺸﺘﻐﻞ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﹴ ﻟﻠﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻲ" ،4ﺣﻴﺚ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻟﻐﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﺩﻭﺍﺎ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻃﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺬﺍ ﻓﻠﹸﻐﺔﹸ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺗﺘﻐﻴﺮ ﻭﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ "ﺷﻬﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ
ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺗﻐﲑﺍ ﰲ ﺃﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ" ،5ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻳﺴﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﻟﻐﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ
ﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﻏﺮﺽ ﻛﻞﱢ ﻋﻠﻢﹴ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ "ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﰲ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ )ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ(
ﺃﻗﺎﻭﻳﻞ ﺑﻠﻐﺔ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ،6"ﻭﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻲ"ﻗﺪ ﺗﺘﺴﻊ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻀﻴﻖ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻌﻤﻠﺔ ،ﻣﻦ ﺛﻮﺍﺑﺖ ﻭﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻭﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﲢﻮﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ،ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺤﺼﺮ ﺎ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ" ،7ﻓﻠﹸﻐﺔﹸ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻭﺗﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﲑ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻣﻨﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﻭﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺎﻝ"ﻗﻮﻝﹲ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺃﻭ ﻗﻮﻝﹲ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ )ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺎﻃﺐ( ﻗﻮﻟﹰﺎ ﺑﻠﻐﺔ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ،8"ﻭﺗﺆﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ
ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﺍ ﻛﺒﲑﺍ ﻭﻓﻌﺎﻟﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺇﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻻﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥﱠ "ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﰲ
ﳎﺎﻝ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﰲ ﻟﻐﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺭﻣﺔ ،ﲝﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺯﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﺎﺥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻱ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﺪ ﰲ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﺃﻗﺮ ﺑﺄﻥﱠ ﺍﻛﺘﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﱢﻖ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ،ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ )ﻛﻞﱡ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲﹴ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻌﻠﱡﻢﹴ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻘﱡﻞ ﻳﻨﻄﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻣﺴﺒﻘﹰﺎ( ،ﻓﺎﳌﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻨﻄﻠﻖ ﺗﻌﻘﱡﻞ ﻣﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﺎ ،ﺗﻨﺒﺜﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻣﺴﺒﻘﹰﺎ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺘﺞ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻﺑﺪ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ،ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ،ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺔ ﲞﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺩﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻟﻮ
ﺑﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺑﺴﻴﻄﺔ ،1"ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥﱠ ﻟﻐﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺗﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭﻧﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﺮﺗﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﱢﻫﻦ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺑﻨﻈﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﶈﻜﻢ ﻭﺑﻨﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﺸﻜﱠﻞ ﺎ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ "ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻤﺘﻊ ﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔﹸ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻨﻴﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥﱠ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻳﻨﺴﻴﻨﺎ
ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻟﻸﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻹﺟﺮﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻭﳔﺺ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﱢﻛﺮ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ" ،2ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺩﻭﺍﺕ
ﺗﺴﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﻛﹶﺮﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺣﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﱪﺯ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ
ﻭﻗﺪﺭﺍﺎ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥﱠ" ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﺗﺆﺩﻱ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺩﻭﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻇﺎﺋﻒ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺠﺰ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﺎﻕ
ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﲞﺎﺻﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﻨﻔﺮﺩ ﺎ".3
ﻭﻧﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﺼﻒ ﺑﺄﻧﻬﺎ ﻟﻐﺔﹲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔﹲ ﲢﻤﻞ ﰲ ﻃﻴﺎﺎ
ﺃﺳﺴﺎ ﻭﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﱢﻫﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺎﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺑﻐﺾ
ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﺎﺋﻒ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﺩﻳﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ.
/2-1-1ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻟﻐﺔﹰ :ﻳﺼﺐ ﺍﳉﺬﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻱ ﳌﺎﺩﺓ )ﺡ،ﺝ،ﺝ( ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺟﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻌﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻗﺪ
ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ" :ﺍﳊﺞ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪ ،ﺣﺞ ﺇﻟﻴﻨﺎ ﻓﻼﻥﹲ ﺃﻱ ﻗﺪﻡ ،ﻭﺣﺠﻪ ﳛﺠﻪ ﺣﺠﺎ :ﻗﺼﺪﻩ،
ﻭﺣﺠﺠﺖ ﻓﻼﻧﺎ ﻭﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪﺗﻪ ﺃﻱ ﻗﺼﺪﺗﻪ" ،1ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪ ،ﻭﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺁﺧﺮ
"ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺔ :ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ :ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﺍﳊﺠﺔﹸ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻓﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳋﺼﻢ؛ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﺯﻫﺮﻱ :ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻟﻈﱠﻔﺮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳋﺼﻮﻣﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺭﺟﻞﹲ ﻣﺤﺠﺎﺝ ﺃﻱ ﺟﺪﻝﹲ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﺎﺻﻢ ،ﻭﲨﻊ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ،ﺣﺠﺞ
ﻭ ﺣﺠﺎﺝ ، ﻭﺣﺎﺟﻪ ﳏﺎﺟﺔﹰ ﻭﺣﺠﺎﺟﺎ :ﻧﺎﺯﻋﻪ ﺍﳊﹸﺠﺔﹶ ،ﻭﺣﺠﻪ ﳛﺠﻪ ﺣﺠﺎ :ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺠﺘﻪ ،ﻭﰲ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ :ﻓﺤﺞ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻣﻮﺳﻰ ﺃﻱ ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺔ :ﻭﺍﺣﺘﺞ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﺗﺨﺬﻩ ﺣﺠﺔﹰ".2
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ )ﺣﺠﺞ(" ،ﺍﺣﺘﺞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺼﻤﻪ ﲝﺠﺔ ﺷﻬﺒﺎﺀَ ،ﻭﲝﺠﺞ ﺷﻬﺐﹴ،
ﻭﺣﺎﺝ ﺧﺼﻤﻪ ﻓﺤﺠﻪ ،ﻭﻓﻼﻥﹲ ﺧﺼﻤﻪ ﳏﺠﻮﺝ ، ﻓﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﳏﺎﺟﺔ ﻭﻣﻼﺟﺔﹲ".3
ﻭﻇﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﺃﻥﱠ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺗﺘﻔﻖ ﻭﺗﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﰲ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﲔ ﻃﺮﻓﲔ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺧﺼﻤﲔ ﰲ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ،ﳛﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﻗﻨﺎﻉ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﲝﺠﺔ
ﻛﻮﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻐﻠﱡﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺼﻤﻪ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﺣﻴﺚ "ﻭﺑﺮﺟﻌﻮﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺪﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻣﻮﺳﻴﺔ ﳒﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﻠﺖ ﻟﻔﻆ )ﺍﳊﺠﺔ( ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻓﹰﺎ ﻟـ )ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ( ،ﻭ)ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ(".4
ﻭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﱪﺯ ﺍﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻱ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻠﺢ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ.
/2-1-2ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎ:
ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺻﻄﹸﻠﺢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﺃﻥﱠ "ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ) (Argumentationﲨﻠﺔﹲ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺆﺗﻰ ﺎ ﻟﻠﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱﹴ ﺃﻭ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻟﻪ ،ﺃﻭ ﻫﻮ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ".1
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﶈﺎﺟﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ،ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ:2
ﻓﻤﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻔﲔ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﺗﺘﻠﺨﺺ ﰲ ﺷﻴﺌﲔ:3
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﻳﺆﺗﻰ ﺎ ﻟﺪﻋﻢ ﺃﻃﺮﻭﺣﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ.
ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﺇﻥﱠ "ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻳﻬﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺞ ﻭﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ،ﻷﻥﱠ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﰲ ﺫﺍﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ،
ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﻣﺘﺮﺍﺑﻄﺔ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﺧﺮ ،ﻓﻜﺄﻧﻤﺎ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﻳﺴﺘﻤﺪ ﻗﻮﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ:
ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻛﻘﻮﺓ ﺩﺍﻋﻤﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻧﺎﻓﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﻛﻘﻮﺓ ﻣﺆﻛﱢﺪﺓ ،4"ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﻓﺎﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴ ﹲﺔ
ﺗﻔﺮﺽ ﻗﻴﻤﺘﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﻴﺠﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻌﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺪﻑ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻹﻗﻨﺎﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺘﻠﻘﻲ.
- 1ﲨﻴﻞ ﺻﻠﻴﺒﺎ ،ﺍﳌﻌﺠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻲ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﺒﻨﺎﱐ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﺝ ،1ﺩﻁ1982 ،ﻡ ،ﺹ.446
- 2ﺃﻧﺪﺭﻳﻪ ﻻﻻﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﻻﻻﻧﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻴﺔ ،ﺗﺮ :ﺧﻠﻴﻞ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺧﻠﻴﻞ ،ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﻮﻳﺪﺍﺕ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ-ﺑﺎﺭﻳﺲ ،ﻡ ،1ﻁ، 2
2001ﻡ ،ﺹ.94
- 3ﻋﻠﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺳﻠﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﺣﻆ ﰲ ﺿﻮﺀ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ))ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﺃﳕﻮﺫﺟﺎ(( ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﺱ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﻋﻤﺎﻥ-
ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ ،ﻁ2010 ،1ﻡ ،ﺹ.80
-4ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.80
-35-
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺃﻣﺎ ﲞﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﳍﺪﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﻘﱢﻘﻪ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥﱠ "ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻹﻗﺘﻨﺎﻉ convictionﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ
ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻳﻘﻊ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﻭﺳﻄﻰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ La démonstrationﻭﺍﻹﻗﻨﺎﻉ
،3"La persuationﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺮﺡ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﻠﺤﺠﺎﺝ "ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻠﱢﻢ
ﻗﻮﻟﹰﺎ ﻕ) 1ﺃﻭ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ( ﻣﻮﺟﻬﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﻗﻮﻟﹰﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻕ) 2ﺃﻭ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ
ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ( ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺃﻛﺎﻥ ﻕ 2ﺻﺮﳛﺎ ﺃﻡ ﺿﻤﻨﻴﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻕ 2ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﺠﺔ
ﻕ 1ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻋﻤﻞ ﳏﺎﺟﺔ" ،4ﻟﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﳓﺎﻭﻝ ﺎ ﺍﻹﻗﻨﺎﻉ ﲟﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺗﻨﺒﲏ
ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﻧﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺣﺠﺎﺟﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻧﺴﻮﻕ ﺎ ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻟﻨﺎ.
- 1ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻮﻟﺔ ،ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﺃﹸﻃﹸﺮﻩ ﻭﻣﻨﻄﻠﻘﻪ ﻭﺗﻘﻨﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺼﻨﻒ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ)ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ( ﻟﺒﲑﳌﺎﻥ ﻭﺗﻴﺘﻴﻜﺎﻥ ،ﺿﻤﻦ
))ﺃﻫﻢ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ(( ،ﺹ.299
- 2ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.299
- 3ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.300
4
-ﺷﻜﺮﻱ ﺍﳌﺒﺨﻮﺕ ،ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ،ﺿﻤﻦ))ﺃﻫ ﻢ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ((،
ﺹ.360
-36-
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﹰﺎ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﹰﺎ ،ﻓﺎﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﻭﺍﺳﻊ ﺍﺎﻻﺕ ﻭ"ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ -ﺇﻥﹾ ﺻﺢ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺎ -ﻫﻮ ﻣﺮﻛﱠﺐ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻜﻮﻥﹲ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻄﺒﲔ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻫﻮ
)ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ(ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻛﻠﻲ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﻓﻬﻮ)ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ( ﻭﻫﻮ ﻧﻌﺖ ﻳﻀﻤﺮ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ
ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ،ﺑﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﺪﺩﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻫﻮ ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭﺻﻔﺔﹲ
ﲣﺼﻴﺼﻴﺔﹲ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ" ،1ﻭﰲ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻓﺎﳉﺎﻣﻊ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ "ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ،
ﻭﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﳓﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﲑ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺔ ﻭﺗﻨﻈﻴﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﺸﻜﻞﹴ ﺧﺎﺹ
ﻟﻴﺼﻞ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ،ﻭ ﻫﻮ ﲢﺼﻴﻞﹸ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﳎﻬﻮﻟﺔ ،2"ﻓﻴﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻌﲎ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥﱠ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﱠﺐ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻟﻠﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ " ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺔ ﻓﻸﻥﱠ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﱢﻫﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﺼﻢ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﻟﻠﻐﻠﺒﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ،
ﻓﺎﳊﺠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﺒﺔ ،ﻭﺃﹸﻃﻠﻘﺖ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﻟﻠﻐﻠﺒﺔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ
ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐﹺ ﺑﺎﺳﻢﹺ ﺍﳌﺴﺒﺐ ،ﻓﺎﳊﺠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﺒﺔ ،ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﺃﹸﻃﻠﻘﺖ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺞ ﻟﻠﻐﻠﺒﺔ" ،3ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻬﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﻃﺮﻕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ"،ﻓﺄﺳﻤﻰ ﻫﺪﻑ
ﻟﻠﻤﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻭﺃﻗﺼﻰ ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ" ،4ﻭﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻭﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ
ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻌﻤﻞﹸ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ "ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ،ﻭﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ
ﺍﻟﱪﺍﻫﲔ" ،5ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﱪﺯ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻭ ﺳﻌﺔ ﳎﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ.
- 1ﳏ ﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ،ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭﳎﺎﻻﺗﻪ ،ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ:ﺣﺎﻓﻆ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻮﻱ ،ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﺇﺭﻳﺪ -ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ1431 ،ﻫـ2010/ﻡ ،ﺹ.652
- 2ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻨﻘﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻲ ،ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﺹ.330
- 3ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.330
- 4ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﲑﻭﺍﱐ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﺹ.84
5
-ﳏ ﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳊﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﻲ ،ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻴﺰ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﻮﺓ ﻟﻠﻄﱢﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ،1
1432ﻫـ2011/ﻡ ،ﺹ.12
-37-
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻬﺘﻢ ﺎ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻓﻨﺠﺪﻫﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻪ" ،ﻭﻳﺮﺩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻪ:
)ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻑ ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺔ( ﻭﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻳﻌﻠﱢﻢ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺎ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ
ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ )ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻑ( ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ )ﺍﳊﺠﺔ( ﻓﻬﻮ ﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﻫﲔ ،ﻭﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﺑﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺃﻥﱠ )ﺍﳊﺠﺔ( ﻫﻲ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ" ،1ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻫﻮ
ﳎﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﺩﻧﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻌﺒﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻤﻦ ﰲ ﺁﻟﻴﺎﺗﻪ،
"ﻓﺎﳌﻨﻄﻖ -ﺑﺘﻌﺒﲑ ﺃﺧﺼﺮ -ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺑﺎﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﻃﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺞ
ﻟﻠﻤﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺪﻳﻘﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻌﺒﺮ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻃﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺑﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻑ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺒﺮ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ
ﻃﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ".2
ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺎﻝ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﻜﱢﻞ ﻧﻮﺍﺓ
ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥﱠ "ﻟﹸﺐ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻣﺮﻛﱠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻳﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ
ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ) ،3"(quasi-demonstrationﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﳛﺼﻞ ﲡﺎﻧﺲ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ" ،ﻓﻌﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﳋﻠﻂﹸ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ )ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺣﺠﺠﻚ = ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻨﻚ( ،ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺘﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﱪﺗﲔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺯﻣﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﳍﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻣﲔ ﲣﺘﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﹰﺎ
ﻭﺍﺿﺤﺎ" ،4ﻓﻤﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻳﺘﻠﺨﺺ ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻧﻪ ":ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻣﺆﻟﱠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﻳﻨﺘﺞ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎ
ﺑﺎﻟﺬﱠﺍﺕ ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭﺍ" ،5ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﺠﺔﹸ ﻓﻴﺘﺤﺪﺩ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ" :ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﺄﻟﱠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﻳﺘﺠﻪ
ﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏﹴ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﺼﻞ ﺎ" ،6ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻹﺟﺮﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ
ﰲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ"،ﻓﺎﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻤﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻻﺕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻃﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺘﻤﻲ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺒﻴﻌﻲ" ،1ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ
ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻌﻤﻠﺔ ﻛﺈﺟﺮﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺗﺼﺎﻍﹸ ﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ"ﺣﺼﻮﻝ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫﻨﺔ ﺃﻣﺮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ" ،2ﺣﻴﺚ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ
ﺍﳌﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ ،ﻓﺎﳌﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻛﺤﺠﺞ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ "ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻳﻨﻬﺾ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺠﺞ
ﻣﻔﻴﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻔﻴﺪﺓ ،ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ،ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ". 3
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ ﺗﺴﺘﻤﺪ ﻗﻮﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺟﺎﺀﺕ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻗﻮﺎ ﻛﺤﺠﺞ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﱠﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ" ﲡﺴﻴﺪﻫﺎ ﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻱ؛ ﻛﻤﺎ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ" ،4ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥﱠ ﻣﺪﻯ
ﺻﺤﺔ ﻭﺳﻼﻣﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﺒﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻭﺍﻵﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﺗﺼﺎﻍ ﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ.
ﻭﺗﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﺸﻜﱠﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺸﻜﱢﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻢ ﳏﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃ ﹾﻥ
ﳓﺪﺩ ﺃﻫﻢ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﻭﻣﺰﺍﻳﺎ ﻭﺃﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻫﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺗﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﰲ "ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﱄ
ﻭﺃﺑﻌﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﻣﻌﺮﰲ ﻋﺎﻡ ﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻭﻃﺮﻕ ﻣﻌﺎﳉﺔ ﺍﳌﻠﻔﻮﻇﺎﺕ"،5
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺗﺸﻜﱢﻞ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﰲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻓﺎﳌﺴﺘﺪﻝﱡ" ﻳﺘﻤﻜﱠﻦ ﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻳﺮﺗﺐ
ﻭﻳﺴﻠﺴﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ" ،6ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺃﻥﹾ"ﻳﻌﺒﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺻﺪ ﻭﳛﻘﱢﻖ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﺍﻑ
ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻣﺜﻠﹰﺎ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺠﺰ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻓﻌﻠﹰﺎ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺎ ﻟﻴﻨﺒﲏ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻌﻞﹲ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﺘﻨﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ" ،7ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﱪﺯ
- 1ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ،ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭﳎﺎﻻﺗﻪ ،ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ:ﺣﺎﻓﻆ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻮﻱ ،ﺹ.180
- 2ﺻﺎﺑﺮ ﺍﳊﺒﺎﺷﺔ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ،ﺻﻔﺤﺎﺕ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ،ﺩﻣﺸﻖ-ﺳﻮﺭﻳﺎ ،ﻁ2008 ،1ﻡ ،ﺹ.69
- 3ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.69
- 4ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳍﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻦ ﻇﺎﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮﻱ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﻴﺠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ )ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﻟﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ( ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺪﺓ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ-ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ،
ﻁ2004 ،1ﻡ ،ﺹ.444
- 5ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﺻﺤﺮﺍﻭﻱ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﻠﻴﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﱢﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ-ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ2005 ،1ﻡ ،ﺹ.15
- 6ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳍﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻦ ﻇﺎﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮﻱ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﻴﺠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ )ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﻟﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ( ،ﺹ.17
- 7ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.18
-39-
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﱄ ﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥﱠ "ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺳﻮﺍﺀﺍ ﺃﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﳏﻜﻮﻣﺔ ﺑﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻟﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﳐﺼﻮﻣﺔ ﺃﻡ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﱢﺪﺓ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ" ،1ﻭﻫﺬﺍ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﻴﻦ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﳘﱢﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﻭﺟﻬﺔ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺍﻋﻲ ﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ
ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ "ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻟﻠﺘﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﻳﺪﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﻈﱠﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ".2
ﻭﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺣﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻳﻌﻤﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺓ
ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ" ،ﻓﺎﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻘﺪﱘ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﻟﱠﺔ ﺍﳌﺆﺩﻳﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺘﻤﺜﱠﻞ ﰲ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﺗﺴﻠﺴﻼﺕ
ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻳﺘﻤﺜﱠﻞ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺇﳒﺎﺯ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ،ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ
ﻫﻮ ﲟﺜﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻫﻮ ﲟﺜﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ".3
ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﻨﻄﻠﻖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻗﺪ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ،
"ﻓﺎﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻻﻳﻮﺟﻪ...ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺖ ﰲ ﺻﺪﻕ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎﻩ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ
ﻏﺮﺿﻪ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﻗﻨﺎﻉ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻃﺮﻕ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﻭﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﺭﺗﻜﺎﺯﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﲡﻌﻞ
ﺃﺩﻟﱠﺘﻪ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥﹸ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓﹰ ﺑﻞ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﻀﻤﺮﺓﹰ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﲣﻀﻊ ﻟﺸﺮﻭﻁ
ﺩﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ" ،4ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﻓﺈﻥﱠ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻻ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻻﺗﻨﺎ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﻴﺔ ﲤﺎﻣﺎ ﻷﻥﱠ
ﻫﺪﻓﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﻭﺍﻹﻗﻨﺎﻉ "ﻓﺎﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺧﻄﺎﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻖ ﻟﻠﻜﻠﻤﺔ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻻ
ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻫﲔ ﻭﺃﺩﻟﱠﺔ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻲ" ،5ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ ﻓﺎﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺎﻃﺌﺔ.
- 1ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺑﻮﻝ ﻭﺟﺎﻙ ﻣﻮﺷﻼﺭ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ))ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺻﻞ(( ،ﺗﺮ:ﺳﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺩﻏﻔﻮﺱ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺒﺎﱐ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﻠﻴﻌﺔ
ﻟﻠﻄﱢﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ-ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ2003 ،1ﻡ ،ﺹ.71
- 2ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﺻﺤﺮﺍﻭﻱ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ،ﺹ.16
- 3ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ،ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭﳎﺎﻻﺗﻪ ،ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ:ﺣﺎﻓﻆ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻮﻱ ،ﺹ.58
- 4ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ،ﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻫﻲ ،ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ )ﲝﺚ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺭﻗﺎﺕ( ،ﺹ.139 ،138
- 5ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ،ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭﳎﺎﻻﺗﻪ ،ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ:ﺣﺎﻓﻆ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻮﻱ ،ﺹ.57
-40-
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺗﺴﺘﻬﺪﻑ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺇﻗﻨﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺃﻭ ﺇﻧﺸﺎﺀ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ...ﺍﱁ" ،1ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ
ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﻳﺼﻮﻏﻬﺎ ﻛﺪﻟﻴﻞﹴ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻣﺎ ،ﻭﺑﺎﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺣﺠﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻳﺘﺸﻜﱠﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻐﺔ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓﹰ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻀﻤﺮﺓﹰ ﲝﺴﺐ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻧﺒﻴﻦ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ:2
-3ﺃﻧﺎ ﻣﺘﻌﺐ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﱠﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﳍﺎ،
ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻳﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻛﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻟﻪ "،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﺭﻧﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ،ﻓﺴﻨﺠﺪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﱠﰎ
ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻭﰎﱠ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻭﺃﹸﺿﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﰲ
ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﻟﺚ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺼﺮﺡ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻣﻀﻤﺮﺓﹲ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ ،ﻭﳒﺪ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺫﹸﻛﺮﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻭﺃﹸﺿﻤﺮﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺔﹸ" ،3ﻟﻴﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺧﻼﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺃﳘﱢﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ ﰲ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ.
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻻﺕ" ،ﺇﺫﹾ ﻳﺼﻮﻍﹸ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺧﻄﺎﺑﻪ
ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﻭﻓﻖ ﺍﳌﻘﺘﻀﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻪ ﰲ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺃﺩﻭﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺁﻟﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ
ﻻ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻧﻐﻤﺎﺳﻪ ﰲ ﺳﻴﺎﻗﻪ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﺎﺑﺔ ﳌﻘﺘﻀﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ
ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ" ،1ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺘﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻭﺗﺘﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﺎﺋﻒ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﺩﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﻮﺎ ﻟﻐﺔ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ" ،ﻭﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﺑﺎﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﳐﺼﻮﺻﺔ ﻻ
ﲣﺘﺺ ﲟﺠﺎﻝﹴ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﻄﻮﺍﻋﺔﹲ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﳍﺎ ،ﺇﺫﹾ ﳜﺘﺎﺭ ﺣﺠﺠﻪ
ﻭﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺑﻨﺎﺋﻬﺎ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﻒ ﲞﻄﺎﺑﻪ" ،2ﳑﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ،ﻭﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﻣﻌﺎ ﺑﻨﻴﺘﲔ
ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺗﲔ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﻤﺎ ﺇﻧﺸﺎﺀ ﺩﻻﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ،ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺇﻥﱠ "ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺃﺑﺮﺯ
ﺃﳕﺎﻁ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺠﺰ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻪ) (le supportﻫﻮ
ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ" ،3ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﺴﺒﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻨﻮﻉﹴ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻻﺕ ،ﻓﻤﻦ
ﺧﻼﳍﺎ "ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓﹰ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻳﺔﹰ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﻮﻱ" ،4ﻭﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔﹸ ﻋﻨﺼﺮﺍ ﺣﻴﻮﻳﺎ ﳌﺎ ﲤﻠﻜﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﻃﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﻭﺷﺤﻨﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺛﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﺎ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﹰﺎ ،ﳝﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻴﺔ ﺑﺄﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﺩﻻﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻋﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﺎﺋﻒ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺆﺩﻳﻬﺎ ،ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ
ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ.
- 1ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ،ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭﳎﺎﻻﺗﻪ ،ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ :ﺣﺎﻓﻆ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻮﻱ ،ﺹ.77
- 2ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.79
- 3ﺻﺎﺑﺮ ﺍﳊﺒﺎﺷﺔ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ،ﺹ.62
4
-ﻓﻴﻠﻴﺐ ﺑﻼﻧﺸﻴﻪ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭﺳﺘﲔ ﺇﱃ ﻏﻮﻓﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺗﺮ :ﺻﺎﺑﺮ ﺍﳊﺒﺎﺷﺔ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺭ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺎﺫﻗﻴﺔ ،ﺳﻮﺭﻳﺎ ،ﻁ،1
2007ﻡ ،ﺹ.154
-42-
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺧﻼﺻﺔ:
ﻧﺴﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﳑﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺲ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺻﺎﺭﻣﺔ ،ﻓﻬﻮ
ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺫﻫﻨﻴﺔ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﱢﻫﻦ ﲢﺼﻴﻞ ﻭﺇﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﳛﻘﱢﻖ ﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻓﻪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺪ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺎ ﺇﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﻭﺇﻧﺸﺎﺀ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ
ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺋﺒﺔ ،ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻘﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ،ﻷﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻳﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﲣﺮﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺇﻃﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﲑ ﺍﻟﺬﱢﻫﲏ
ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺋﺐ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻄﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺻﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ
ﺧﻄﺌﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺪﻭﺭﻩ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﻴﺔ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺒﲎ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﻩ ﻭﻳﺴﻠﻚ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻪ ﻭﻓﻖ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﲑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺲ ﻭﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ،ﺗﺴﺘﻤﺪ ﻃﺎﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﻭﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ
ﺻﺎﺭﻣﺔ ،ﺗﻀﻤﻦ ﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﺻﺎﺋﺒﺔ ﻭﺳﻠﻴﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺑﻨﺎﺀﺓ
ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺎﻥ ﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ،ﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻓﻬﺎ
ﻭﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺴﲑ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻣﻨﻮﺍﻟﻪ.
-43-
ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ
ﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﺒﺤﺜﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ،ﺣﻴﺚ "ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻭﲢﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻮﻱ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﳒﺪﻩ ﰲ
ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺧﺮﺓ ﻣﻨﺬ )) ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﰲ ﺗﻠﺨﻴﺺ ﺍﳌﻔﺘﺎﺡ (( ﻟﻠﺨﻄﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ" ،1ﻟﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ﻓﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ.
ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ":ﺃﻥﹾ ﻳﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻠﱢﻢ ﺣﺠﺔﹰ ﻟﻤﺎ ﻳﺪﻋﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ" ،2ﻭﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺣﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﳛﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻠﱢﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥﹾ
ﻳﺄﰐ ﲝﺠﺞﹴ ﻟﻜﻼﻣﻪ ،ﻭﻧﺮﻯ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﹰﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﺗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ )) ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﳉﻮﺯﻳﺔ (( ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ﲢﺖ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ )) ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺠﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﻱ (( ،ﻭ"ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻠﱢﻢ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝﱡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﻀﺮﺏ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﻘﻮﻝ" ،3ﻭﻛﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﺎﻣﻞﹴ ﻭﺃﺩﻕ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ،ﳒﺪ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﲔ
ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭ"ﻫﻮ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ
ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻄﻠﻮﺏ" ،4ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﻹﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ "ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺗﻤﻜﱢﻦ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺣﺠﺔ ))ﺃﻭ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ(( ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﲝﻴﺚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﻠﺰﻣﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ
ﺑﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ" ،5ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺣﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﰲ ﺇﻃﺎﺭﹴ
ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﱄ ﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ.
ﻭﻳﻀﺮﺏ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﻣﺜﻠﹰﺎ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﳝﺔ ،ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ] :ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺁﳍﺔ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺍﷲ ﻟﻔﺴﺪﺗﺎ[ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ :ﺍﻵﻳﺔ.22
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ،ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥﱠ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ،ﳛﺼﻞ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﳍﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻏﲑ
ﺍﷲ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺎﺯﻡ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻣﺎ ﻟﻪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ "ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺎﺯﻡ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﻰ ﺍﳌﻠﺰﻭﻡ" ،1ﺃﻱ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺁﳍﺔﹰ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻠﻦ ﺗﻔﺴﺪﺍ ،ﻭﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﻓﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ
ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﻋﺘﱪ )ﻕ( ﺣﺠﺔﹰ ﺗﺪﻋﻢ )ﻥ( ﺿﻤﻦ ﻗﺴﻢﹴ ﺣﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺈﻥﱠ ﺳﻠﺒﻬﺎ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻠﺐ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺘﻬﺎ
ﺃﻱ:2
ﻥ ) ﺃ( ﻕ
ﻥ )ﺏ( ﻕ
ﻥ ) ﺃ( ﻕ
ﻥ )ﺏ( ﻕ
ﻓﺎﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﺗﺸﺘﺮﻁ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤ ﹶﻞ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﻔﻆ ﻳﻮﺿﺢ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺷﺮﻃﻴﺔ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥﱠ "ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺆﺷﺮ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺳﻲ
ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺯ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻣﺆﺷﺮ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺑﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ".3
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺮﺍﻩ ﰲ ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ )ﻟﻮ ،(ﻭ"ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ )ﻟﻮ (ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻠﻔﻮﻅ ﻟﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻴﺔ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻴﻬﺎ
ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻻ ﳒﺪﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﺃﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻧﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺓ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺍﺳﻢ
ﻭﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﱄ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﳕﻄﺎﹰ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎ ﰲ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻠﻔﻮﻇﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ،ﻭﰲ ﲢﻠﻴﻠﻨﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻃﺎﺭ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﲟﺨﻄﱠﻂ )) ﺗﻮﳌﲔ
((toulminﻟﻠﺤﺠﺎﺝ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﳐﻄﱠﻂﹲ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻣﻜﻮﻧﺎﺕ ،ﳓﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻧﻀﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻟﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔﹰ
ﳌﺜﺎﻟﻨﺎ ،ﻟﺘﺘﻀﺢ ﻭﻇﺎﺋﻔﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﻃﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ:2
- 1ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ،ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﻃﻠﺤﺔ ،ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺩﻱ ))ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﲢﻠﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻭﺣﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻢ ﻟﻠﺮﺍﻓﻌﻲ(( ،ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﺇﺭﺑﺪ-ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ ،ﻁ2012 ،1ﻡ ،ﺹ.158
- 2ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ،ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ،ﺹ.159
-47-
ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾﹺ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ
ﻓﻤﺎ ﻧﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﱠﻂ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﺸﻜﱠﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﲢﻠﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻧﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﳝﺜﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﺎﹰ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﻴﺎ ﳛﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﱠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻭﺿﻌﺖ
ﲟﻘﺘﻀﺎﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ )ﺍﻟﻀﺎﻣﻦ( ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻧﺪ ،ﻭﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺎﺯﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﻨﺘﻔﻲ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻪ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ.
ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ
ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺁﳍﺔﹰ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ
ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﻟﹶﻮ
ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺍﷲ
-48-
ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾﹺ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ
ﻓﻤﺎ ﻗﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﲢﻠﻴﻠﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﳍﺔ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺍﷲ ،ﻷﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺎﺯﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﳘﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ
ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻣﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ،ﻭﲟﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﱂ ﺗﻔﺴﺪﺍ ﲝﻜﻢﹺ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ
ﺧﻼﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻷﻟﻮﻫﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻳﻨﻔﻲ ﺗﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻵﳍﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ ﰲ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻧﻪ "ﻟﹶﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﱂ ﺻﺎﻧﻌﺎﻥ ،ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻻ ﳚﺮﻱ ﺗﺪﺑﲑﳘﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﹴ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺘﺴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡﹴ ،ﻭﻟﻜﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ﻳﻠﺤﻘﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ".1
ﻭﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﳍﺔ ﻏﲑ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺆﺷﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻠﻔﻮﻅ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺓ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻌﻤﻠﺔ ))ﻟﹶﻮ ،((ﺇﺫ ﻫﻲ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺒﺮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺓ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ "ﺇﻧﺸﺎﺀ
))ﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ(( ﺃﻭ ))ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﻻﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ(( ،ﻓﺎﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺑـ )) ﻟﹶﻮ (( ﻳﺪﻝﱡ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺬﺏ ﲨﻠﱵ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻣﻌﺎ" ،2ﺃﻱ:ﻛﺬﺏ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﳍﺔ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻛﺬﺏ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺽ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺏ
ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻧﺎﺗﺞ ﻋﻦ ﻛﺬﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﻨﺎ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﳍﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻏﲑ ﺍﷲ ﻧﺎﺟﻢ ﻋﻦ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ،
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺗﺨﺬﻧﺎﻩ ﻛﻔﺮﺿﻴﺔ ،ﻷﻥﱠ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﳌﺴﻠﱠﻤﺔ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻛﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺪﻗﻬﺎ ﺃﻭﻻ ،ﻛﻮﺎ ﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﺣﺠﺔﹰ
ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﻧﺘﺨﺬﻫﺎ ﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺘﻨﺎ.
- 1ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ ،ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ،ﺗﺢ ،ﳏﻤﺪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺙ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ-ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﺝ ،2ﻁ،3
1404ﻫـ1984/ﻡ ،ﺹ.25
- 2ﺷﻜﺮﻱ ﺍﳌﺒﺨﻮﺕ ،ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻲ ،ﺹ.140
-49-
ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾﹺ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﻧﻜﺮﻱ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ "ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﺣﺠﺔ ﺇﻗﻨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺑﺮﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﺗﺸﲑ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﺣﺠﺔﹲ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺔ ﻻﺷﺘﻤﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻼﺯﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ".1
ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﻣﺜﺎﻟﹰﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺑﻐﺔ:
2
ﻣﻠﻮﻙ ،ﻭﺇﺧﻮﺍﻥ ،ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺪﺣﺘﻬﻢ *** ﺃﹸﺣﻜﱠﻢ ﰲ ﺃﻣﻮﺍﳍﻢ ﻭﺃﻗــﺮﺏ
ﻛﻔﻌﻠﻚ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻡﹴ ﺃﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﺻﻄﻔﻴﺘﻬﻢ *** ﻓﻠﻢ ﺗﺮﻫﻢ ﰲ ﻣﺪﺣﻬﹺﻢ ﻟﻚ ﺃﺫﻧﺒﻮﺍ
ﻭﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻫﺪ ،ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻄﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻧﺘﺞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺁﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻄﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﻱ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ:
ﻥ ) ﺃ( ﻕ
ﻥ )ﺏ( ﻕ
ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻹﳚﺎﺏ ﰲ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ،ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ) ﺃ ( ﺑﺜﺒﻮﺕ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﻣﺪﺡ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺑﻐﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻠﻮﻙ ﻭﺍﻹﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺠﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﺈﻋﻄﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﺇﻳﺎﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﻝ ﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻣﺪﺣﻪ ﳍﻢ ،ﻷﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺑﺎﳌﺪﺡ ،ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﻳﺘﺤﻘﱠﻖ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﺑﺘﺤﻘﱡﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ،ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺔﹰ ﺷﺮﻃﻴﺔﹰ،
- 1ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﻧﻜﺮﻱ ،ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﰲ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ ))ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ(( ،ﺗﺢ :ﻗﻄﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﺑﻦ ﻏﻴﺎﺙ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ
ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺎﻣﻴﺔ ،ﺣﻴﺪﺭ ﺁﺑﺎﺩ ،ﺍﳍﻨﺪ،ﺝ ،2ﻁ1975 ،1ﻡ ،ﺹ .15 ،14
- 2ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺑﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﱡﺑﻴﺎﱐ ،ﺷﺮﺡ ﻭﺗﻘﺪﱘ :ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺗﺮ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ1416 ،3ﻩ1996/ﻡ،
ﺹ.28
-50-
ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾﹺ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺷﺮﻁ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺎﺯﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺪﺡ ﻟﻴﺘﺤﻘﱠﻖ ﺍﳌﻠﺰﻭﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﺑﺎﳌﺎﻝ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺏ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ.
ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺳﻠﺐ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ،ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ )ﺏ( ﻣﺆﺩﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻠﺐ ﺛﺒﻮﺕ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ،
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻣﺪﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺑﻐﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻠﻮﻙ ﻭﺍﻹﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﻟﻦ ﻳﺠﺎﺯﻯ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﱂ ﳝﺪﺣﻬﻢ ،ﻓﺸﺮﻁﹸ ﳎﺎﺯﺍﻢ ﻟﻪ
ﻫﻮ ﻣﺪﺣﻪ ﳍﻢ ،ﻓﺈﻥﹾ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺤﻘﱠﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻓﻠﻦ ﻳﺘﺤﻘﱠﻖ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ،ﺃﻱ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ.
ﻥ ) ﺃ( ﻕ
ﻥ )ﺏ( ﻕ
ﻓﻬﻨﺎ ﻧﺮﻯ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻹﳚﺎﺏ ﰲ ﲢﻘﱡﻖ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ،ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ )ﺃ( ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﲢﻘﱡﻖ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ
ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺻﻄﻔﻴﺖ ﻗﻮﻣﺎ ﻭﻓﻀﻠﺘﻬﻢ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻬﻢ ﻳﺮﺩﻭﻥ ﻓﻀﻠﻚ ﺑﺎﳌﺪﺡ ﺣﺴﻨﺎ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﺪﺡ
ﻳﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻻﺻﻄﻔﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻕ"،ﺃﻧﺖ ﺃﺣﺴﻨﺖ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻡﹴ ﻓﻤﺪﺣﻮﻙ ،ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﻮﻡ ﻓﻤﺪﺣﺘﻬﻢ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻣﺪﺡ ﺃﻭﻟﺌﻚ ﻻﻳﻌﺪ ﺫﻧﺒﺎ ،ﻓﻜﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺪﺣﻲ ﳌﻦ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺇﱄﱠ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺫﻧﺒﺎ".1
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﰲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﲢﻘﱡﻖﹺ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ،ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ )ﺏ( ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺛﺒﻮﺕ
ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﺗﺤﺴﻦ ﻟﻘﻮﻡﹴ ﺍﺻﻄﻔﺎﺀﺍ ﳍﻢ ،ﻓﻠﻦ ﳝﺪﺣﻮﻙ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻓﺎﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳚﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﳚﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺘﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ"،ﻓﺎﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ
ﻻ ﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﺭﺍﺑﻂ ﺣﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﻳﺴﻌﻰ ﺇﱃ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﻻﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ" ،1ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳒﺪﻩ ﰲ ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ))ﺇﺫﺍ(( ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ.
ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ
ﺗﺤﻜﱠﻢ ﰲ ﺃﻣﻮﺍﳍﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﺪﺣﺖ ﻗﻮﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﻢ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﲢﻠﻴﻠﻨﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﺗﻀﺢ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻃﺮﻓﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺎﺯﻡ ﻭﺍﳌﻠﺰﻭﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻌﺘﱪﻩ
ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺣﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﺎﲡﺎﹰ
ﻋﻨﻪ ﻛﺠﺰﺍﺀ ﻟﻪ ،ﻓﺎﳌﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻲ ﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ))ﺍﳌﺪﺡ(( ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺗﺞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺃﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﻫﻮ
))ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﻥ(( ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻨﻔﻴﺎ ،ﺃﻱ ))ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺪﺡ(( ،ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﻲ
ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﱢﻖ ﻭﻣﺸﺘﺮﹺﻁﹲ ﺑﻮﻗﻮﻋﻪ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺗﺞ ﻣﻨﻔﻴﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﺃﻱ ))ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﻥ(( ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﲢﻘﱠﻖ
ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺪﺡ ،ﻷﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﺪﺡ ﻳﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﻥ" ،ﻓﺎﻟﺜﱠﺎﺑﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝﹴ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡﹴ ﺇﱃ ﻻﺯﻡﹴ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ" ،1ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺎﺯﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻠﺰﻭﻡ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺰﺍﻣﻴﺔ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺻﻮﺭﺗﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﳘﺎ:2
ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺡ ﺑﺎﻹﺣﺴﺎﻥ ،ﰲ ﺃﻥﹾ ﲤﺪﺡ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺤﺴﻦ
ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﺤﺴِﻦ ﳌﻦ ﻣﺪﺣﻚ ﺟﺰﺍﺀﺍ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ .
ﺬﺍ ﺗﺘﺠﻠﱠﻰ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺈﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻧﺴﺘﺪﻝﹸ ﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ،ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥﱠ "ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ﺃﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﺣﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﻳﻮﻇﱢﻔﹸﻪ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻠﱢﻢ ﻹﻗﻨﺎﻉ ﺧﺼﻤﻪ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ" ،3ﻭﻳﺘﺤﻘﱠﻖ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺑﺈﳚﺎﺩ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻧﺼﻞﹸ ﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻛﺪﻟﻴﻞﹴ" ،ﻭﺗﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺍﳊﺠﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻷﻧﻬﺎ
ﺗﺴﺎﻕ ﻷﺟﻠﻪ ،ﻓﺎﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ))ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻄﻠﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ (( ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﺻﻠﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻟﺰﻭﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﺰﻭﻡ" ،1ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﻴﺔ ﻧﺼﻞﹸ ﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ
ﺑﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﲞﺎﺻﻴﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ "ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﻭﻇﱢﻔﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲤﺘﺰﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﺳﺎﻟﻴﺐ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﲟﺎ ﳝﻨﺢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺳﻠﻮﺏ
ﻗﻮﺓﹰ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺑﻼﻍ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ" ،2ﻭﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺠﺞ ﻋﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﺪﻑ
ﺍﻹﻗﻨﺎﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻗﺼﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻄﻤﺢ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺟﻞﱡ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ.
ﻳﻨﺪﺭﺝ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻄﺮﺍﺩ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ "ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﲎ
ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﺘﺼﻞﹴ ﺑﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﺑﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ" ،3ﻭﻣﺜﺎﻟﹸﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﻛﻘﻮﻝ
ﺍﳊﻤﺎﺳﻲ )ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻮﺃﻝ(:
4
ﻭﺇﻧﺎ ﻟﻘﻮﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﺳﺒﺔﹰ *** ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﺗﻪ ﻋﺎﻣﺮ ﻭﺳﻠﻮﻝﹸ
ﻓﻤﺎ ﻧﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻲ ،ﻫﻮ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻗﺼﺪﻳﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﺗﻼﺯﻣﻴﺎ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﺳﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ:
ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡ
ﻭﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﺳﺒﺔﹰ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻴﺒﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺒﻴﻠﱵ ﻋﺎﻣﺮ ﻭﺳﻠﹸﻮﻝ ﻓﺈﻥﱠ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻴﺒﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ،
ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ،ﻫﻨﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻻﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ،ﻓﻨﺘﺞ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻛﺮ
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ،ﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻴﲔ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻫﻲ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﺟﻤﻌﺖ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻻﺷﺘﺮﺍﻛﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺠﺎﺀ ﺇﺛﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻣﻌﲎ ﻧﺎﺗﺞﹴ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺬﺍ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﺝ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻴﲔ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻗﻮﻟﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ:
ﻥ ﻕ
ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﺃﻱ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﻋﻴﺒﺎ ،ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩﺍ ﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﻋﺎﻣﺮ
ﻭﺳﻠﻮﻝ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻴﺒﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﳌﺮﻭﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻟﻪ.
-55-
ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾﹺ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ
ﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ،ﻓﻨﻼﺣﻆ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ:
ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ ،ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ،ﺇﺫﹾ ﺇ ﱠﻥ
ﺗﻘﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻃﺎﻋﺘﻪ ﺷﺮﻁ ﰲ ﲢﻘﱡﻖﹺ ﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﺑﺄﺳﻪ ﻭﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﻟﺘﺤﻘﱡﻘﻪ ﻛﺠﺰﺍﺀ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ
ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﺠﺰﺍﺀ ،ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻘﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺎﻋﺘﻪ ﻳﻨـﺰﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺄﺱ ﺑﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ،
ﻓﺎﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺇﻟﱠﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﱠﺎﻋﺔ ،ﻭﲟﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺮﻁ ﻭﲢﻘﻖ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﺃﻱ ﻗﻮﻝ
ﻭﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥﱠ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﳛﺘﻢ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻭﺳﻠﺒﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﲢﻘﱡﻖ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻓﻠﻨﺎ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻧﻀﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ:
ﻥ ) ﺃ( ﻕ
ﻥ )ﺏ( ﻕ
ﻓﻌﺪﻡ ﳊﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﺄﺱ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﱴ ،ﻫﻮ ﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺗﻘﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻃﺎﻋﺘﻪ ﻟﻪ ،ﺇﺫﹾ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺭﺿﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻳﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺄﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻘﺎﺀ
ﻭﺇﻥﹾ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺮﻡ ،ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺳﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺳﻠﺐ ﳉﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ،ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻘﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺎﻋﺔ ﻳﻠﺤﻖ ﺍﻟﺒﺄﺱ ﻛﺠﺰﺍﺀ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﻓﺴﺒﺐ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺳﻠﺒﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻋﻠﱠﺔﹲ ﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ،ﻷﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﳊﺼﻮﻝ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ
ﻷﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺷﺮﻃﻴﺔ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻼﺯﻡ ﺟﺰﺁﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ.
-56-
ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾﹺ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ
ﻭﲟﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺷﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﻫﻨﺎ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﻮﺍﻝ ﺗﻮﳌﲔ:
ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ
ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺄﺱ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﺗﻘﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﻃﺎﻋﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺷﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﹶﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ،ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺛﺒﻮﺕ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻲ "،ﺇﺫﹾ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ
ﺛﺒﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺛﺒﻮﺕ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ،ﻓﺘﻮﺟﺪ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﻭﺗﻨﺘﻔﻲ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻪ ،ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ
ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺷﺮﻁ ،ﻃﺮﺩﺍ ﻭﻋﻜﺴﺎ ،ﻻﻃﺮﺩﺍ ﻓﺤﺴﺐ" ،1ﻓﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﱠﺎﻋﺔ ﷲ ﻳﻠﺤﻖ ﺍﻟﺒﺄﺱ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺛﺒﻮﻤﺎ
ﻓﻴﻤﻨﻊ ﺑﺄﺳﻪ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻣﺎ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ.
ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ:
3
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺑﺖ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﻓﻔﺎﺿﺖ ﺩﻣﺎﺅﻫﺎ *** ﺗﺬﻛﱠﺮﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﰉ ﻓﻔﺎﺿﺖ ﺩﻣﻮﻋﻬﺎ
ﻓﻨﻼﺣﻆ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺟﺰﺍﺀﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻄﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺗﻌﻠﱠﻖ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻄﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ،ﻓﻨﺘﺞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺷﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﳕﺜﱢﻠﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻵﰐ:
ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﺃﺻﺎﺧﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﻓﻠﺞ ﺎ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻓﻠﺞ ﰊ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡ
ﺃﺻﺎﺧﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﻓﻠﺞ ﺎ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻓﻠﺞ ﰊ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ
ﻓﻤﺎ ﻧﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﰲ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﻫﻮ ﳉﺎﺝ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ ﻭﳉﺎﺝ ﺍﳍﺠﺮﹺ ،ﻓﻠﺰﻡ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﱠﺔ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺐ ﻣﺎ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺇﱃ ﳉﺎﺝ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﳍﺠﺮ.
ﻭﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻌﻨﻴﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻣﻌﻄﻰ ﻭﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ:
ﺃﺻﺎﺧﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﻓﻠﺞ ﺎ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻓﻠﺞ ﰊ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ
ﻥ )ﺏ( ﻕ
ﻭ ﱂﹾ ﺗﺼﺦ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﻭ ﱂﹾ ﻳﻠﺞ ﺎ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﻟﹶﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﳌﺎ ﰿﱠ ﺎ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ
ﻓﻘﺪ ﺯﺍﻭﺝ ﺑﲔ ﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻭﺇﺻﺎﺧﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﻭﳉﺎﺝ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ،ﰲ ﺃﻥﹾ ﺭﺗﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻟﻜﻼﹶ ﲨﻠﱵ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ،ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ
ﲨﻠﺔ ﺷﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺣﺪ ﺫﺍﺎ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﳍﺎ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺷﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﺇﺫﹾ ﺃﺩﺕ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ
ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ "ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﻣﺘﺘﺎﺑﻌﺔ ،ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻂ ﲟﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ،ﻓﺘﺼﺒﺢ
ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ" ،1ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺣﺠﺔﹰ ﻟﻠﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺣﺠﺔ ﳌﺎ
ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ،ﻟﺘﺼﺒﺢ "ﻛﻞﱠ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺗﺴﺘﺘﺒﻊ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ،ﻓﺘﺼﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﳌﺎ
ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ" ،2ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﻧﻪ" ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﻨﺎﺀﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻠﺴﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻲ ﺍﻟﻈﱠﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻭﻝ
ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ" ،3ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺐ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ،ﺃﻱ ﻛﺎﻵﰐ:
ﻥ ﻕ
ﻓﻴﺼﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺋﻴﺔ ،ﻭﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥﹾ ﳕﺜﱢﻞ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ
ﲟﺨﻄﱠﻂ ﺗﻮﳌﲔ ﻟﺘﺘﺒﻴﻦ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ:
ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ
ﰿﱠ ﺎ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﺎ ﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺍﳍﻮﻯ
ﻓﻨﺮﻯ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺑﺜﺒﻮﺕ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳍﺠﺮ ﻛﹶﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ،ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺎﱐ
-60-
ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾﹺ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﺘﺮﻙ ﺣﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻮﺍﻫﺎ ﻓﹶﻴﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﺒﻲ ﳍﺎ ،ﻓﺎﺳﺘﻤﻌﺖ ﻫﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﻓﺎﺯﺩﺍﺩ ﻫﺠﺮﻫﺎ ﱄ
ﻭﻓﺎﺭﻗﹶﺘﲏ ،ﲝﺠﺔ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﱂ ﺗﻄﻖ ﻣﻦ ﳛﺎﻭﹺﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﻴﲏ ﻭﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻭﺣﺠﺔ
ﳊﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ،ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﻓﻨﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺟﺰﺍﺀﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺃﺩﻯ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺗﻌﻠﱠﻖ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ
ﰲ ﻋﺠﺰ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮﻱ ،ﳌﻼﺯﻣﺔ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﺑﻮﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﺎﻵﰐ:
ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡ
ﻭﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺗﺂﻟﻒ ﻣﻌﻨﻴﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺟﻮﺍﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﳉﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﻭﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﻟﻠﺸﺮﻁ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﺗﺴﻠﺴﻠﹰﺎ ﺷﺮﻃﻴﺎ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﲨﻠﱵ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻣﻌﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺗﻴﺐ ،ﲤﺎﻣﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ.
ﻓﺎﻟﺸﺎﻋﺮ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺯﺍﻭﺝ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﺏ ﻭﺗﺬﻛﱡﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﹸﺮﰉ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺍﺀ ﻭﻧﺘﺞ ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﺾ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﺀ
ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻛﺠﺰﺍﺀ ﳍﻤﺎ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻋﺘﱪﻧﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺃﺩﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ
ﲨﻠﺔ ﺷﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻧﺎﲡﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻨﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥﹾ ﻧﻌﺘﱪ ﺑﺎﳌﺜﻞ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ
ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﻧﺎﲡﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ" ،ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺑﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﰲ ﺗﺴﻠﺴﻞ
ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﻭﺑﺎﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﺃﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﻟﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ،ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻴﻪ )ﺑﲑﳌﺎﻥ ﻭﺯﻣﻴﻠﻪ( ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ" ،1ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺴﻠﺴﻞ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳒﺪﻩ ﰲ ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺗﺴﻠﺴﻞﹲ ﺷﺮﻃﻲ ﺑﲔ ﲨﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﻠﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﺬﺍ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥﹾ
ﻧﺮﺑﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻭﻝ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﺮﺍﺏ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﺞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻓﻴﺾ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻉ.
ﻥ ) ﺃ( ﻕ
ﻥ )ﺏ( ﻕ
ﻟﻦ ﺗﺘﺬﻛﱠﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﹸﺮﰉ ﻭﻟﻦ ﺗﻔﻴﺾ ﺩﻣﻮﻋﻬﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﲢﺘﺮﺏ ﻳﻮﻣﺎ ﻟﻦ ﺗﻔﻴﺾ ﺩﻣﺎﺅﻫﺎ
ﻓﻨﻼﺣﻆ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺷﺮﻃﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺷﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﻣﻊ
ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ،ﻟﻨﺘﻤﻜﱠﻦ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻛﻤﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ
ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ:
ﻥ ﻕ
-62-
ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾﹺ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ
ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ
ﻭﺬﺍ ﺻﺎﺭ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎ ﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﺯﻣﻴﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺄﺧﺬﹸ ﺻﻮﺭﺍ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔﹰ ﻭﻣﺘﻨﻮﻋﺔﹰ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ،ﺇﺫﹾ ﻳﻀﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺷﺮﻃﹰﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺷﺮﻃﻲ ﻧﺎﺗﺞ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻗﻮﻟﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻟﻪ.
-63-
ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾﹺ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ
ﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺘﺒﺎﻉ ﻓﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻮﻱ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ" :ﺍﳌﺪﺡ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﺘﺒﻊ
ﺍﳌﺪﺡ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ" ،1ﻛﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﰊ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﻴﺐ ﺍﳌﺘﻨﺒﻲ:
2
ﳍﹸﻨﺌﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺄﻧﻚ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﻧﻬﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺣﻮﻳﺘﻪ***
ﻭﻧﻼﺣﻆ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ،ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺷﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﺗﻼﺯﻣﻴﺔ ،ﺇﺫﹾ ﺍﺳﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﻭﻧﺘﺞ
ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻧﻀﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ:
ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡ
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺪﺡ ﻣﻮﺟﻪ ﳌﻦ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺘﻞ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺋﻪ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﻧﻚ ﺒﺖ ﻭﻗﺘﻠﺖ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻋﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻋﺸﺘﻪ ﺩﻫﺮﺍﹰ ﳍﹸﻨﺌﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﲞﻠﻮﺩﻙ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻗﺘﻠﻪ ،ﻓﺎﳌﺪﺡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﺨﻠﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺄﻥ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳋﻠﻮﺩ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻋﻴﺶ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﻮﺍﺀ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﻔﺲﹺ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻠﻰ ﺩﻻﻟﺔﹲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻭﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﺓ
ﺍﻟﻌﻴﺶ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻌﻴﺶ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻞ ﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﳋﻠﻮﺩ ﻳﺘﻄﻠﱠﺐ ﺩﻫﺮﺍ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﹰﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﱠﺎﺯﻡ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻀﻮﺭ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺣﺘﻮﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﺭ ﳌﻠﺰﻭﻡ ﺍﳋﻠﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ ،ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﳋﻠﻮﺩ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﻻﺣﺘﻮﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﺭ" ،ﻓﺎﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺎﺯﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻡ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﺍﺗﻪ ﺇﻳﺎﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺎﻭﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻼﺯﻣﲔ ﻓﻴﺼﲑ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺎﺯﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻠﺰﻭﻡ ﺇﺫﺍﻙ ﲟﱰﻟﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻠﺰﻭﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺎﺯﻡ" ،1ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﱪﺭ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺎﺯﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻠﺰﻭﻣﻪ ﻋﻜﺴﻴﺔ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺷﺮﻃﻴﺔ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻟﻸﻭﻝ ﻻﻟﺘﺰﺍﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ،
ﻟﺬﺍ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻵﰐ:
ﻥ ) ﺃ( ﻕ
ﻭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺐ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ:
ﻥ )ﺏ( ﻕ
ﻓﺎﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺣﺘﻮﺍﺀ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺘﻠﺖ ﻟﺘﻬﻨﺄ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺄﻧﻚ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍﱂ ﲢﻮﻩ ﻓﻠ ﻦ
ﺗﺨﻠﱠﺪ ﻭﺳﺘﻌﻴﺶ ﻛﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻓﺎﳋﻠﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻟﻠﻌﻴﺶ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻞ ﻭﻣﻼﺯﻡ ﻟﻪ ،ﺣﱴ ﺗﻨﺎﻝ ﺻﻔﺔ ﺍﳋﻠﻮﺩ،
ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻂ )ﻟﹶﻮ (ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﻌﺎﺩ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﳋﻠﻮﺩ ،ﺇﺫﹾ ﻫﻲ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ،ﺃﻱ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺋﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻓﹶﻠﹶﺎ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺓ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻓﺎﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻟﻪ
ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ.
ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ
ﳍﹸﻨﺌﹶﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﲞﻠﻮﺩﻙ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﺣﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺒﺖ ﻟﻮ
ﻓﺎﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺷﺮﻃﻴﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﻷﻥﱠ ﻗﺘﻞﹶ ﺍﻷﻋﺪﺍﺀ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﺻﻼﺡ ﻟﻠﺪﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻥﱠ "ﻣﺪﺣﻪ ﺑﺒﻠﻮﻏﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺎﻋﺔ ﺇﺫﹾ ﻛﹶﺜﹸﺮ ﻗﺘﻼﻩ،
ﲝﻴﺚﹸ ﻟﻮ ﻭﺭﺙ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﺭﻫﻢ ﳋﹸﻠﱢﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺘﺒﻊ ﻣﺪﺣﻪ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﺳﺒﺒﺎ ﻟﺼﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ
ﻭﻧﻈﺎﻣﻬﺎ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﻬﻨﺄﺓﹰ ﲞﻠﻮﺩﻩ" ،1ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺇﻥﱠ ﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳋﻠﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﺘﻒ ﻻﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ
ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ.
ﺧﻼﺻﺔ:
ﻟﻘﺪ ﺣﺎﻭﻟﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﺒﻴﻘﻲ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﺑﻐﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺸﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ
ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻀﻤﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ،ﻓﺮﺃﹶﻳﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﲢﻤﻞ ﰲ ﻃﻴﺎﺎ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ
ﻭﺍﻟﺒﲎ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ،ﺗﺘﻨﺎﺳﻖ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ،ﺗﺸﻜﱢﻞ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ،
ﻭﻗﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺟﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﱠﻄﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﺒﲏ
ﻭﺗﺘﺄﻟﱠﻒ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺣﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ.
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺪﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﻭﺍﻹﻗﻨﺎﻉ ﺍﲡﺎﻩ
ﺍﳌﺘﻠﻘﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻣﻊ ،ﻭﳏﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﻟﻴﻘﺘﻨﻊ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ،ﻭﺗﻌﺘﱪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺻﺪ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺻﺪﻫﺎ.
-67-
ﺧﺎﲤـﺔ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﻞﱢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﻤﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺘﻘﺼﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﻃﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻀﻤﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﲡﻠﱠﺖ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺎﺕ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ،ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎﹶ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺍﺗﺴﻢ ﰲ ﺑﻨﺎﺋﻪ ﲜﻤﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﲢﻤﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻭﻇﺎﺋﻒ ﺗﺆﺩﻳﻬﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ.
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ،ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ،ﻭﺍﻵﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ،ﻭﺳﻨﺤﺎﻭﻝ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻛﻞﱠ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﺻﻠﻨﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ:
-ﺗﺒﻴﻦ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺣﺼﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﲢﺴﲔﹴ ﻭﺗﺰﻳﲔﹴ ﻓﺤﺴﺐ ،ﺇﺫﹾ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ
ﺃﻧﻬﺎ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﲢﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﻭﺍﻹﻗﻨﺎﻉ ﺍﲡﺎﻩ
ﺍﳌﺘﻠﻘﻲ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺇﻗﻨﺎﻋﻪ ﲜﻤﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ،ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺃﻭ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ
ﻳﺬﻋﻦ ﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻣﻊ ،ﻭﻳﺴﻠﱢﻢ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ.
-ﺃﻥﱠ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻗﻨﺎﻉ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﺣﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺗﻘﻊ ﲢﺖ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﳛﺎﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﳍﺎ
ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻠﱢﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﺭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻣﻊ ﲟﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ،ﻟﻴﺼﻞﹶ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﳌﺘﻠﻘﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﺫﻋﺎﻥ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ ،ﻓﻴﻘﺘﻨﻊ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﲟﺎ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ
ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ.
-ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻼﺯﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﱠﺎﱐ ،ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ
ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻁ ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ ،ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ،ﺇﺫﹾ ﺗﺴﻠﱢﻢ ﺍﻷﺫﻫﺎﻥ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺣﺠﺞ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺮﺑﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ.
-ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺗﻨﺒﲏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ،ﻣﺎ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ.
-ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﲎ ﲜﻤﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻤﻴﺰ
ﺑﻮﻇﺎﺋﻒ ﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻂ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﺗﺴﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﻭﺭﺑﻂ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﻞ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻻﻻﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻗﺎﻭﻳﻞ ﻭﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻹﻗﻨﺎﻉ.
-69-
ﺧﺎﲤـﺔ
-ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲ ﰲ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﲡﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻧﺒﻨﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺇﻧﺘﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺗﺘﺴﻊ
ﺎﻻﺕ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻻﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﺑﲔ
ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻄﺌﻬﺎ ،ﻟﻴﺒﲏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ.
-ﺃﻥﱠ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺻﻮﺭ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﳒﺪﻩ ﻳﺘﻼﺀﻡ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻨﺎ،
ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﲢﻠﻴﻼﺗﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺪﻑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺸﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻄﺮﺣﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ،
ﻟﻴﺘﺒﻴﻦ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥﱠ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻳﻬﺘﻢ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ ﲜﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﲢﺖ ﺑﺎﺏﹴ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺑﺎﶈﺴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ
ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺃﳘﱢﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻲ ﻛﹶﻜﹸﻞ.
ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﻭﰲ ﺎﻳﺔ ﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﺇﻧﻨﺎ ﱂ ﻧﻔﹾﺼﻞ ﺑﺸﻜﻞﹴ ﺎﺋﻲ ﰲ ﲢﻠﻴﻼﺗﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻟﻜﻞﱢ ﻣﺎﻋﺮﺿﻨﺎﻩ ﻓﻴﻪ،
ﻓﻼ ﻳﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻹﺣﺎﻃﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ،ﺧﺎﺻﺔﹰ ﻭﺃﻥﱠ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﺘﻪ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﺟﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ.
-70-
ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ
ﺍﳉﺮﺟﺎﱐ )ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ( ،ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﻴﻬﺎﺕ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ: (13
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﺣﺴﲔ ،ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻵﺩﺍﺏ ،ﺩﻁ1418 ،ﻫـ1997/ﻡ.
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ )ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ( ،ﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪ، (14
ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ1405 ،1ﻫـ1985/ﻡ.
ﺍﳊﺒﺎﺷﺔ )ﺻﺎﺑﺮ( ،ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ،ﺻﻔﺤﺎﺕ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ،ﺩﻣﺸﻖ -ﺳﻮﺭﻳﺎ، (15
ﻁ2008 ،1ﻡ.
ﺩﻳﺸﲔ )ﺃﻧﺪﺭﻳﻪ ﺟﺎﻙ( ،ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮﺹ ﻭﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ،ﺗﺮﲨﺔ :ﻫﻴﺜﻢ ﻟﹶﻤﻊ ،ﺍﳌﺆﺳﺴﺔ (16
ﺍﳉﺎﻣﻌﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﺩﻁ ،ﺩﺕ.
ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ )ﻓﺨﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ( ،ﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﳚﺎﺯ ﰲ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻹﻋﺠﺎﺯ ،ﻣﻄﺒﻌﺔ (17
ﺍﻵﺩﺍﺏ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ -ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﺩﻁ1317 ،ﻫـ.
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ )ﻃﻪ( ،ﺍﻟﻠﱢﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠﻲ ،ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﻘﺎﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ، (18
ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ1998 ،1ﻡ.
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ )ﻃﻪ( ،ﲡﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﰲ ﺗﻘﻮﱘ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺙ ،ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﻘﺎﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ- (19
ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ ،2ﺩﺕ.
ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺎﱐ )ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ( ،ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺖ ﰲ ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ ،ﺿﻤﻦ)) ﺛﻼﺙ (20
ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﰲ ﺇﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ(( ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﳏﻤﺪ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﷲ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺯﻏﻠﻮﻝ ﺳﻼﻡ ،ﺩﺍﺭ
ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﻁ ،3ﺩﺕ.
ﺭﻭﺑﻮﻝ )ﺁﻥ( ﻭ ﺟﺎﻙ ﻣﻮﺷﻼﺭ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ))ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺻﻞ(( ،ﺗﺮﲨﺔ: (21
ﺳﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺩﻏﻔﻮﺱ ﻭ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺒﺎﱐ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﻠﻴﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﱢﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ،1
2003ﻡ.
ﺍﻟﺮﻳﻔﻲ )ﻫﺸﺎﻡ( ،ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ،ﺿﻤﻦ ))ﺃﻫﻢ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻟﻴﺪ (22
ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ(( ،ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ :ﲪﺎﺩﻱ ﺻﻤﻮﺩ ،ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﲰﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻬﻮﺭﻳﺔ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻧﺴﻴﺔ ،ﺩﻁ ،ﺩﺕ .
-73-
ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ
ﺍﻟﺰﺭﻛﺸﻲ) ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ( ،ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ، (23
ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﳏﻤﺪ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺙ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ-ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﺝ ،2ﻁ،3
1404ﻫـ1984 /ﻡ.
ﺍﻟﺰﳐﺸﺮﻱ )ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺟﺎﺭ ﺍﷲ( ،ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﺑﺎﺳﻞ ﻋﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺍﺭ (24
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﺝ ،1ﻁ1419 ،1ﻫـ1998/ﻡ.
ﺍﻟﺴﻜﺎﻛﻲ )ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺏ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜﺮ( ،ﻣﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪ (25
ﻫﻨﺪﺍﻭﻱ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ1420 ،1ﻫـ2000/ﻡ.
ﺳﻼﻣﺔ )ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ( ،ﺑﻼﻏﺔ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻮﻧﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻷﳒﻠﻮ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ ،ﻁ،1 (26
1369ﻫـ1950/ﻡ.
ﺳﻠﻤﺎﻥ)ﻋﻠﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ( ،ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﺎﺣﻆ ﰲ ﺿﻮﺀ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ))ﺭﺳﺎﺋﻠﻪ (27
ﺃﳕﻮﺫﺟﺎ(( ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﺱ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﻋﻤﺎﻥ -ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ ،ﻁ2010 ،1ﻡ.
ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻮﺃﻝ )ﺑﻦ ﻋﺎﺩﻳﺎﺀ( ،ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻮﺍﻥ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﲑﻭﺕ ﻟﻠﻄﱢﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ، (28
1402ﻫـ1982/ﻡ.
ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮﻱ )ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳍﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻦ ﻇﺎﻓﺮ( ،ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﻴﺠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ))ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﻟﻐﻮﻳﺔ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ((، (29
ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺪﺓ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ2004 ،1ﻡ.
ﺍﻟﺸﲑﻭﺍﱐ )ﻋﻠﻲ( ،ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻬﻴﺪ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﺩﻁ ،ﺩﺕ. (30
ﺻﺎﱀ )ﺣﺴﻦ ﺑﺸﲑ( ،ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﻼﺳﻔﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﻓﺎﺀ ﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ (31
ﺍﻟﻄﱢﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ،ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ -ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﻁ2003 ،1ﻡ.
ﺻﺤﺮﺍﻭﻱ )ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ( ،ﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ))ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ (32
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﺙ ﺍﻟﻠﱢﺴﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﰊ(( ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﻠﻴﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﱢﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ،1
2005ﻡ.
ﺻﻠﻴﺒﺎ )ﲨﻴﻞ( ،ﺍﳌﻌﺠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻲ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﺒﻨﺎﱐ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﺝ ،1ﺩﻁ، (33
1982ﻡ.
ﺻﻮﻟﺔ )ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ( ،ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﺃﹸﻃﹸﺮﻩ ﻭﻣﻨﻄﻠﻘﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﺗﻘﻨﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺼﻨﻒ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ- (34
ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ -ﻟﺒﲑﳌﺎﻥ ﻭﺗﻴﺘﻴﻜﺎﻥ ،ﺿﻤﻦ))ﺃﻫﻢ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ
-74-
ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ
ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ(( ،ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ :ﲪﺎﺩﻱ ﺻﻤﻮﺩ ،ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﲰﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻬﻮﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻧﺴﻴﺔ ،ﺩﻁ،
ﺩﺕ.
ﺿﻴﻒ )ﺷﻮﻗﻲ( ،ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﻭﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﺍﻟﻨﻴﻞ -ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ ،ﻁ ،9ﺩﺕ. (35
ﻃﻠﺤﺔ )ﳏﻤﻮﺩ( ،ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺩﻱ ))ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﲢﻠﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻭﺣﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻢ (36
ﻟﻠﺮﺍﻓﻌﻲ(( ،ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﺇﺭﺑﺪ-ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ ،ﻁ2012 ،1ﻡ.
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻠﻲ )ﳏﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳊﺎﺝ( ،ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻴﺰ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﻮﺓ ﻟﻠﻄﱢﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ (37
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ1432 ،1ﻫـ2011/ﻡ.
ﻋﺘﻴﻖ )ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ( ،ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﺩﻁ،ﺩﺕ. (38
ﺍﻟﻌﺰﺍﻭﻱ )ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ( ،ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﺒﻊ ،ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﺀ-ﺍﳌﻐﺮﺏ، (39
ﻁ1426 ،1ﻫـ2006 /ﻡ.
ﺍﻟﻌﺰﺍﻭﻱ )ﺃﺑﻮﺑﻜﺮ( ،ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ،ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﱢﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ (40
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ2010 ،1ﻡ.
ﺍﻟﻌﺴﻜﺮﻱ )ﺃﺑﻮ ﻫﻼﻝ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻬﻞ ( ،ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﺘﲔ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﻋﻠﻲ ﳏﻤﺪ (41
ﺍﻟﺒﺠﺎﻭﻱ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺇﺣﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ،ﻁ1371 ،1ﻫـ1952/ﻡ.
ﻋﻠﻲ)ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻨﻘﻮﺭ( ،ﺃﺳﺎﺳﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﱢﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ، (42
ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ1435 ،1ﻫـ2013/ﻡ.
ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ )ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ( ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ،ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭﳎﺎﻻﺗﻪ ،ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ:ﺣﺎﻓﻆ (43
ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ﻋﻠﻮﻱ ،ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﺇﺭﺑﺪ -ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ ،ﺝ ،1ﻁ،1
1431ﻫـ2010/ﻡ.
ﻓﻴﻮﺩ )ﺑﺴﻴﻮﱐ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ( ،ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ))ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﻴﺔ ﻭﻓﻨﻴﺔ ﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ (44
ﻭﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ(( ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺜﱠﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺣﺴﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﻨﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺯﻳﻊ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ -ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﻁ،2
1418ﻫـ1998/ﻡ.
ﺍﻟﻘﺰﻭﻳﲏ )ﺟﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﻦ( ،ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ)) ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ (45
ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ(( ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ1424 ،1ﻫـ2003/ﻡ.
-75-
ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ
ﺍﻟﻘﲑﺍﻭﱐ )ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺭﺷﻴﻖ( ،ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺪﺓ ﰲ ﳏﺎﺳﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﻭﺁﺩﺍﺑﻪ ﻭﻧﻘﺪﻩ، (46
ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﳏﻤﺪ ﳏﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳉﻴﻞ ،ﺳﻮﺭﻳﺎ ،ﻁ1401 ،5ﻫـ1981/ﻡ.
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﳉﻮﺯﻳﺔ )ﴰﺲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﳏﻤﺪ( ،ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺍﺋﺪ ﺍﳌﺸﻮﻕ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺁﻥ (47
ﻭﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻁ1327 ،1ﻫـ.
ﻻﻻﻧﺪ )ﺃﻧﺪﺭﻳﻪ( ،ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻋﺔ ﻻﻻﻧﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻴﺔ ،ﺗﺮﲨﺔ:ﺧﻠﻴﻞ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺧﻠﻴﻞ ،ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭﺍﺕ (48
ﻋﻮﻳﺪﺍﺕ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻡ ،1ﻁ2001 ،2ﻡ.
ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ )ﺑﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ( ،ﺍﳌﺼﺒﺎﺡ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ (49
ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﻁ1409 ،1ﻫـ1989/ﻡ.
ﺍﳌﺒﺨﻮﺕ )ﺷﻜﺮﻱ( ،ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻲ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ،1 (50
2006ﻡ.
ﺍﳌﺒﺨﻮﺕ )ﺷﻜﺮﻱ( ،ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﱡﻐﺔ ،ﺿﻤﻦ))ﺃﻫﻢ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﰲ (51
ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ(( ،ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ :ﲪﺎﺩﻱ ﺻﻤﻮﺩ ،ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﲰﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻬﻮﺭﻳﺔ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻧﺴﻴﺔ ،ﺩﻁ ،ﺩﺕ .
ﺍﳌﺘﻨﱯ ) ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻄﱠﻴﺐ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﺍﳉﻌﻔﻲ( ،ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻮﺍﻥ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﲑﻭﺕ ﻟﻠﻄﱢﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ، (52
ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ1403 ،ﻫـ1983/ﻡ.
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻴﺪ )ﲨﻴﻞ( ،ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﱢﺴﺎﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻴﺔ ،ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺮﻳﺔ (53
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﻜﺘﺎﺏ ،ﺩﻁ1998 ،ﻡ.
ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ )ﺃﲪﺪ( ،ﻣﻌﺠﻢ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻠﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﻄﻮﺭﻫﺎ ،ﻣﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺷﺮﻭﻥ، (54
ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ2007 ،2ﻡ.
ﺍﳌﻈﻔﺮ )ﳏﻤﺪ ﺭﺿﺎ( ،ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻟﻠﻤﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ،ﺩﻁ1427،ﻫـ2006/ﻡ. (55
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺰ) ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺱ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ( ،ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻣﻄﺮﺟﻲ ،ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ (56
ﺍﻟﺜﱠﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ1433 ،1ﻫـ2012/ﻡ.
ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ)ﲨﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ( ،ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺏ ،ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ،ﺍﻟﻨﻴﻞ-ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻫﺮﺓ، (57
ﺩﻁ،ﺩﺕ.
-76-
ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ
ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻨﻘﺪ )ﺃﺳﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺮﺷﺪ( ،ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﺃﲪﺪ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻱ (58
ﻭﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻴﺪ ،ﻣﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﰊ ﺍﳊﻠﱯ ﻭﺃﻭﻻﺩﻩ ،ﻣﺼﺮ ،ﺩﻁ1380،ﻫـ1960/ﻡ.
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺑﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﱡﺑﻴﺎﱐ )ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻳﺔ( ،ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻮﺍﻥ ،ﺷﺮﺡ ﻭﺗﻘﺪﱘ :ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺗﺮ ،ﺩﺍﺭ (59
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ،ﺑﲑﻭﺕ -ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻁ1416 ،3ﻫـ1996 /ﻡ.
ﺍﻟﻨﻘﱠﺎﺭﻱ )ﲪﻮ ،(ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﺟﺞ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ ﻭﳎﺎﻻﺗﻪ ﻭﻭﻇﺎﺋﻔﻪ ،ﻣﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺡ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺍﺭ (60
ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺎﺀ ،ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﻁ ،ﺍﳌﻐﺮﺏ ،ﻁ1427 ،1ﻫـ2006/ﻡ.
ﻧﻜﺮﻱ )ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﲪﺪ( ،ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﰲ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ (61
))ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ(( ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ :ﻗﻄﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﺑﻦ ﻏﻴﺎﺙ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ،ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺎﻣﻴﺔ،
ﺣﻴﺪﺭ ﺁﺑﺎﺩ-ﺍﳍﻨﺪ ،ﺝ ،2ﻁ1975 ،1ﻡ.
-ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻠﱠﺎﺕ:
(1ﺫﺍﻛﺮ )ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ( ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ،ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻪ ﻭﳎﺎﻻﺗﻪ ،ﳎﻠﱠﺔ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ،ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳌﻠﻚ
ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ،ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻳﺖ ،ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ2011،2ﻡ.
-77-
ﻓﻬﺮﺱ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ
ﻓﻬﺮﺱ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺤﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﻛﻠﻤﺔ ﺷﻜﺮ
ﺇﻫﺪﺍﺀ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻄﺮﺍﺩ54...................................................................... :
ﺍﳌﺰﺍﻭﺟﺔ58........................................................................ :
-79-
ﻓﻬﺮﺱ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺘﺒﺎﻉ64....................................................................... :
ﺧﺎﲤﺔ69........................................................................... :
-80-
ﺺ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚﻣﻠﺨ
ﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻌﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﰲﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﶈﺴ :ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﱢﺮﺓ
ﺎ ﰲ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺘﻌﲔ، ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺎﱠﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﻭﳍﺎ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﻗﺎﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺸﻒﺭﺍﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺪﺍﻭﻟﻴ ﺍﻟﺪﺘﻢ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻲﻌﺘﱪ ﻭ ﻳ،ﻌﺮﺽ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎﻴﻘﺘﻨﻊ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺄﺛﲑ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﻻﻻﺕ ﺑﹺﻬﺪﻑ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻠﻘﱢﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺇﻧﺘﺎﺟﻬﺎ ﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﻌﺪ
ﺨﺬﻫﺎ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻠﱢﻢﺎﺕ ﻳﺘﻰ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﻼﻕ ﻣﻦ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔﹲ ﺗﺘﺒﻨ،ﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ
ﺬﺍ ﻓﺎﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔﹲ ﺷﺎﻣﻠﺔﹲ ﻟﻜﻞﱢ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻳﻄﻤﺢ ﰲ ﻭ،ﺎ ﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻹﻗﻨﺎﻋﻪ ﺠﺞﹴ ﳛﺎﻭﻝ ﻭﺣﻛﻤﺴﻠﱠﻤﺎﺕ
ﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﺘﻐﻞﹸ ﺣﻴﺚﹸ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ، ﲢﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ،ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳍﺪﻑ
. ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻞﹸ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻳﻊ ﻗﻴﻤﺘﻪ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺟﻴﺔ،ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﱄ ﰲ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻬﺎ
-Summury:
building show ideas and new provisions for its predecessor, which makes the
argumentatif value of Budaiya.
-Resumé:
-83-