Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Collected here are fifty-one key thinkers and fifty-one authors, recogniz-
ing that women are fifty-one percent of the population.There are actually
one-hundred-and-two thinkers featured in these pages, as each author is a
feminist thinker, too: scholars, writers, poets, and activists, well-established
and emerging, old and young, and in-between.These feminists speak the
languages of art, politics, literature, education, classics, gender studies, film,
queer theory, global affairs, political theory, science fiction, African Amer-
ican studies, sociology, American studies, geography, history, philosophy,
poetry, and psychoanalysis. Speaking in all these diverse tongues, conver-
sations made possible by feminist thinking are introduced and engaged.
Key figures include:
• Simone de Beauvoir
• Doris Lessing
• Toni Morrison
• Cindy Sherman
• Octavia Butler
• Marina Warner
• Elizabeth Cady Stanton
• Chantal Akerman
• Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak
• Audre Lorde
• Barbara E. Johnson
• Sappho
• Adrienne Rich.
Showing readers that feminist theory remains one of the most exciting
sites for engaging questions of both political thought and action, Fifty-
One Key Feminist Thinkers creates a remarkable conversation between
feminist theorists past and present. Considering questions of identity,
freedom, power, justice, desire, autonomy, inclusion, difference, and
what ‘counts’ as feminism, Fifty-One Key Feminist Thinkers offers read-
ers a thought-provoking vision of the past and future of feminist theory.
Cristina Beltrán, Associate Professor,
Department of Social and Cultural Analysis, New York University, USA
Lori Marso has done an artful job of selecting authors to tell the stories
of feminism. This is a delightful collection of the intellectual contribu-
tions of a range of feminist thinkers.
Falguni A. Sheth, Associate Professor of Women’s,
Gender and Sexuality Studies, Emory University
FIFTY-ONE KEY
FEMINIST THINKERS
Typeset in Bembo
by Cenveo Publisher Services
for Luci
Women can be angry, wild, passionate, powerful, loving, violent, frus-
trated, sad, truthful, hungry, tender. Women can change the world;
women can be free.
This page intentionally left blank
C ONTENTS
Historical timeline ix
List of contributors xi
Preface xxi
Acknowledgments xxiii
vii
CONTENTS
Index 263
viii
H ISTORICAL TIME L I N E
ix
HISTORICAL TIMELINE
x
C ONTRIBUTOR S
xi
CONTRIBUTORS
xii
CONTRIBUTORS
xiii
CONTRIBUTORS
xiv
CONTRIBUTORS
xv
CONTRIBUTORS
xvi
CONTRIBUTORS
xvii
CONTRIBUTORS
xviii
CONTRIBUTORS
xix
CONTRIBUTORS
xx
PRE FAC E
xxi
PREFACE
xxii
ACKNOWLEDGMEN T S
This book is for Luci whose “Women Who Changed the World” has
always been an inspiration.
xxiii
This page intentionally left blank
ABIGAIL ADAMS (1744–1818)
Patricia Moynagh
Abigail Adams is often held up as a feminist thinker and rightly so. Her
most quoted line “Remember the Ladies” appears in a letter, dated
March 31, 1776, written to her husband, John Adams, future president
of the United States. But at this moment, the United States is not
yet united. Just shy of 100 days from declaring its independence from
Great Britain, the newly envisioned nation is a messy work in process,
a battleground occupied by factious stakeholders. The idea of liberty
is unquestionably in the air, expressed loudly in the call for independ-
ence from King George III and his occupying army, the redcoats. Yet
many contenders express loyalty to the so-called “mother country,”
and some, even if they desire independence, fear that freedom for all
could bring disorder. The prospect of expanding liberty electrifies
some and terrifies others.
Like many, Abigail Adams was directly and adversely affected by
these conditions, raising her four children in the war zone that Mas-
sachusetts had become. John’s role as a delegate (representing his state)
took him away to Philadelphia (often for long periods) where, as a
member of the Continental Congress, he was a leading founder of
self-proclaimed revolutionary forces formulating ideas about how to
govern. In his absence, Abigail played deputy husband. To her role of
running the family, finances and farming were added. Referring to the
revolutionary movement of which John was increasingly becoming a
major contributor, he implored Abigail in 1774 “to take Part with me
in this struggle” [1774] (1975, 59).
Join him in struggle she certainly would. Little did he expect her
to seek its logical conclusion through expansion of liberty for slaves
and women. Their physical separation, while difficult for them, has left
researchers a treasure trove. She in Braintree (later named Quincy in
1803) and he in Philadelphia, their only way to connect was through
letter-writing. Reading their epistolary exchanges (they preserved
1,160 letters between them) provides great insight into their times and
how they differently understood the future of the nation.
Abigail wants women to be positively positioned to live their lives
more fully. She contests the many and various laws, barriers, and
customs that diminish women to a vassal caste, a subordinate spe-
cies, legally superfluous. With all this talk of liberty, what of women’s,
she asks. Yet even before she gets to her famous command to “be
more generous and favourable” to women “than your ancestors,” she
1
ABIGAIL ADAMS (1744–1818)
I have sometimes been ready to think that the passion for Liberty
cannot be Eaquelly Strong in the Breasts of those who have been
accustomed to deprive their fellow Creatures of theirs.
[1776] (1975, 120)
As much as two years prior (1774), she had written to John on the
same topic: “I wish most sincerely there was not a Slave in the prov-
ince.” She added:
As the letter continues, it’s clear she is thinking much more widely
about liberty and beseeching her husband to do the same. She knows
he opposes slavery. She also knows she is his most trusted advisor and
confidante. A frequent salutation to each other is “Dearest Friend”
and she invokes this appellation over that of “Master” whether in
relation to slave or wife, telling him to “give up the harsh title of
Master for the more tender and endearing one of Friend” [1776]
(1975, 121).
Abigail herself was not oppressed by race or class, but by her sex.
But when Abigail advocated on behalf of her sex, John dismissed her
as a “rebel” by using the same adjective, “sausy,” to describe her unruli-
ness as he had to depict other “rebels” six years earlier in 1770. At that
time, he defended British soldiers who shot and killed five “rioters,”
an event that would be dubbed the Boston Massacre. Maybe there was
some lawyerly honor in his commitment to show that British soldiers
could get a trial in his state (he never regretted this decision, calling
it one of the most “gallant” and “manly” of his life), but there is no
undoing his words [1773] (2008–2015). In the courtroom, he depict-
ed the crowd that threw oyster shells and snowballs at the soldiers as
“most probably a motley rabble of sausy boys, negroes and mulat-
toes, Irish teagues and out landish jack tarrs” [1770] (2008–2015, 12).
Among the “jack tars” was the black seaman, Crispus Attucks. Five of
the seven soldiers, along with their captain, were acquitted and the
other two were eventually exonerated, while the murdered—those
2
ABIGAIL ADAMS (1744–1818)
who had acted out against the injustices of the British—could not
tell their stories.To John, “rebels,” the category into which John’s wife
was quickly descending, were dispensable, but not so the “revolu-
tionaries.” The rebels were the dispossessed, the forgotten, the non-
stakeholders. Those who rebelled, rather than revolutionized, did not
count in the same way. They counted not, in fact: the new nation
would be for the haves.
Responding to Abigail’s letters, John viewed her as impertinently
out of line. If Abigail advocated for women she was with the “sausy
boys,” but if she kept to her class and race, she was a patriot. Attempt-
ing to reach him in yet another way, Abigail declares: “Men of Sense
in all Ages abhor those customs which treat us only as the vassals of
your Sex” [1776] (1975, 121). Upon reading her “extraordinary Code
of Laws” [1776] (1975, 122–23), John replies: “I cannot but laugh”
[1776] 1975, 122–23). After enumerating—in jest-like fashion—all
the insubordinate groups such as Children, Apprentices, “Colledges,”
Indians and Negroes, that have become “disobedient,” “grown tur-
bulent,” or otherwise “insolent,” John says her letter was “the first
Intimation that another Tribe more numerous and powerfull than all
the rest were grown discontented” [1776] (1975, 123).
So close to power was this soon-to-be second first lady (the term
had not yet been invented) when she told her beloved to be “more
generous” to women than his ancestors had been, Abigail Adams had
John’s ear, but it did not matter. She warns him of the hardness of
“arbitrary power” which is “liable to be broken” [1776] (1975, 127).
Finally she capitulates, while also making her best attempt to save face,
by proclaiming “not withstanding all your wise Laws and Maxims,”
women have “power not only to free ourselves but to subdue our
masters” [1776] (1975, 127).Yet Abigail is not satisfied and reaches out
to her friend and playwright Mercy Otis Warren, with whom she long
corresponded. She complains about her husband’s response. She sug-
gests how they will together “petition Congress” [1776] (2015). From
many a plea, she moves to petition.
What Abigail urged her husband to do in the spring of 1776 remains
unfulfilled. A party of one, however close to power, won’t carry the day,
not when centuries’ worth of practices and institutions to reinforce
them have promoted the diminution of women. It was not then, and is
not now, enough to plead with one’s oppressors. Nevertheless, that she
spoke up at all and left her letters for her like-minded descendants to
read shows that even a party of one is better than a non-existent one.
Speaking up should not be underestimated even if the hearer does not
like the message.
3
ABIGAIL ADAMS (1744–1818)
That the idea to “petition Congress” did not come to pass does not
diminish Abigail’s aspiration to transform her party of one into a peti-
tion of two. She was on the right track. For women to come together
for common cause remains essential for enacting change. Each time
members of the “more numerous tribe” speak out and work together
for women’s greater freedom, we are that much closer to honoring this
aspect of Abigail’s legacy.
Note to readers
First, anyone who writes about the Adamses is confronted with how to
refer to them. Scholarly convention holds that the last name is used. Yet
they share a last name (she was born a Smith). I have opted to refer to them
by their first names, but with some hesitation because women are so often
referred to this way, men less so. Second, Eighteenth Century English is dif-
ferent from our own. I have kept the original letters intact, mistakes and all.
Further reading
Gelles, Edith B. 2009. Abigail and John: Portrait of a Marriage (New York:
Harper-Collins).
Gelles, Edith B. 1992. Portia: The World of Abigail Adams (Bloomington
and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press).
Holton, Woody. 2009. Abigail Adams: A Life (New York: Free Press).
Jacobs, Diane. 2014. Dear Abigail: The Intimate Lives and Revolutionary
Ideas of Abigail Adams and Her Two Remarkable Sisters (New York: Bal-
lantine Books).
4
Abigail Adams (1744–1818)
1975. The Book of Abigail and John: Selected Letters of the Adams Family
1762–1784, edited and with an introduction by Butterfield, L. H. , Friedlaender,
Marc and Kline, Mary-Jo (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
2007. My Dearest Friend: Letters of Abigail and John Adams, edited by Hogan,
Margaret A. and James Taylor, C. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
2008–2015. Taylor, C. James (ed.). The Adams Papers Digital Edition
(Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, Rotunda).
2016. Taylor, C. James (ed.). Founding Families: Digital Editions of the Papers of
the Winthrops and the Adamses (Boston: Massachusetts Historical Society).
www.masshist.org/digitaladams/archive/letter/
Gelles, Edith B. 2009. Abigail and John: Portrait of a Marriage (New York: Harper-
Collins).
Gelles, Edith B. 1992. Portia: The World of Abigail Adams (Bloomington and
Indianapolis: Indiana University Press).
Holton, Woody . 2009. Abigail Adams: A Life (New York: Free Press).
Jacobs, Diane . 2014. Dear Abigail: The Intimate Lives and Revolutionary Ideas of
Abigail Adams and Her Two Remarkable Sisters (New York: Ballantine Books).