Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUBMITTED TO THE
BY
Researcher Name: Kazi Mohammad Junaid
ENROLLMENT NO:- 204111181409
1|Page
PANVEL, NAVI MUMBAI 410216
I further declare that to the best of my knowledge this thesis does not contain
any part of any work which has been submitted for the award of any degree
either by this university or by any other university/ deemed university without a
proper citation.
2|Page
CERTIFICATE OF THE SUPERVISOR
III. Fulfills the requirements of the ordinance related to LL.M Degree of the
university and,
IV. It is up to the standard in respect of both content and language for being referred
to the examiner.
3|Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my visionary & research guide DR.
AVANI MISTRY and co-supervisor DR. BHANU SAXENA, who have devoted
their valuable time thereby providing invaluable guidance throughout this
research.
Last but not the least, my implied thanks to all those not named, as it is impossible
to name everyone and I also appreciate the affectionate, valuable co-operation and
help of my colleagues.
4|Page
Plagiarism Report
5|Page
ABSTRACT
Women who have been sexually attacked once are more likely to be sexually
assaulted again, according to research (re-victimized). Social support, personal
behaviour, and psychological health are all elements that influence the chance of
a woman being re-victimized. According to this study, a combination of these
characteristics lead to a woman's self-perception as a sexual assault victim or
survivor. Re-victimization is determined by this self-perception. Twenty women
were interviewed in order to learn more about the victim or survivor experience.
The relationship between mentality and re-victimization. The incident had
serious implications for all of the women. Some women develop a victim
attitude as a result of negative repercussions. Some women were able to see the
good side of their assault and developed a survivor mindset as a result of it. The
negative repercussions of the initial victimisation were linked to re-
victimization, as was the victim mindset that emerged from the negative
outcomes. Non-re-victimization reasons were similar to non-re-victimization
reasons, and they were linked to good outcomes of the assault and the survivor
attitude that arose from the positive results. A sexual assault victim's general
attitudes and behaviours affect whether she regards herself as a victim or a
survivor, which has a considerable impact on her chances of re-victimization.
6|Page
TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS
Etc Ex carta
& And
Vs. Versus
Ors. others
i.e. That is
e.g. example
No. Number
7|Page
LIST OF AUTHORITIES
3. Devanand Vs State.
14. Mukesh and Anr Vs State for NCT of Delhi and Anr.
8|Page
LIST OF STATUES
1. Child marriage restraint Act.
9|Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page. 111-111
DecJhanvition by the candidate. 111-111
Certificate of the supervisor. 111-111
Acknowledgement. 111-111
Plagiarism Report. 111-111
Abstract. 111-111
Table of Abbreviations. 111-111
List of Authorities. 111-111
List of Statues. 111-111
10 | P a g e
CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS
I. Introduction to the participants. 111-111
II. Introduction to results. 111-111
Victim thoughts
I. Believed she deserved it. 111-111
II. Negative self-perception. 111-111
III. Emotionally damaged. 111-111
IV. Sexual remission . 111-111
V. Personal relations and perceptions. 111-111
Survivor thoughts
I. Moving on from the assault. 111-111
II. Empowered by the assault and 111-111
experience.
III. Positive impact on her character. 111-111
11 | P a g e
CHAPTER SIX: CASE STUDY
I. Suryanelli Rape Case, Kerala 1996. 111-111
12 | P a g e
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
One of the biggest problems in our society today is the prevalence of sexual
assault. Official police records of female sexual assault differ greatly from the
actual occurrence of female sexual assault. The Uniform Crime Report (UCR)
states that throughout the India 58.6 per 100,000 female inhabitants were
forcibly raped (which includes attempts or assaults to commit rape) in 2008
(INDIAN Department of Justice, 2009). The NCVS (National Crime
Victimization Survey) found that 140 per 100,000 females over the age of 12
were raped or sexually assaulted in 2008 and only 47% were reported to the
police (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2009). While these numbers are high, the
actual occurrence of rape is even higher than that reported by the NCVS because
the NCVS only includes the statistics for women who acknowledge that they
were sexually assaulted or raped. Furthermore, the NCVS only collects data for
children age 12and older, so children under the age of 12 who are sexually
assaulted or rapedare not included in these statistics.
There are several important questions to ask in regard to the problem of sexual
assault and rape in our society: What is sexual assault? What is rape? Who is
susceptible to gaining the attention of a voyeur, being sexually assaulted, 2 or
raped? What happens after a rape is committed? The Bureau of Justice Statistics
(2010) provides this definition of sexual assault:
These crimes include attacks or attempted attacks generally involving unwanted
sexual contact between victim and offender. Sexual assaults may or may not
involve force and include such things as grabbing or fondling. Sexual assault
also includes verbal threats. (p.7)
According to this definition, it is reasonable to assume that many women have
been sexually assaulted and never reported it to the police. Here is an illustration
of a common occurrence of sexual assault by definition: a woman is in a bar and
13 | P a g e
walks by a man who squeezes her buttocks. This is sexual assault that will not
likely be reported to the police.
The Bureau of Justice Statistics (2010) provides this definition of rape: Forced
sexual intercourse including both psychological coercion as well as physical
force . . . This category also includes incidents where the penetration is from a
foreign object such as a bottle. Includes attempted rapes . . . [which] includes
verbal threats of rape. (p.7) By this definition of rape, there are many instances
where the woman may not even consider that she was raped. For example, a
boyfriend threatens to break up with his girlfriend if she does not have sex with
him; this is psychological coercion and is rape according to its definition. Many
young women in this type of 3 situation may not believe themselves to have
been raped and would not report this to the police or in a victimization survey.
All women are susceptible to sexual assault and rape. However, after a woman is
raped or sexually assaulted, either as a child or an adult, she is significantly more
susceptible to additional incidents of rape or sexual assault (i.e. re-
victimization). Instances of re-victimization in victims of child sexual abuse,
adolescent sexual assault, and adult sexual assault range from 15% to 72%
(Mason, Ullman, Long, Long, & Starzynski, 2009). In a report from the
Department of Justice, women who were not raped prior to age 18 had a 9%
victimization rate; women who were raped prior to age 18 were twice as likely
to be raped after age 18, an 18% re-victimization rate (Tjaden & Thoennes,
1998).
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
SURVIVOR OR VICTIM
After a person has been sexually abused, many factors have the potential to
contribute to her re-victimization. Social support, self-blame, social reactions,
substance use, alcohol use, risk taking ounselli, risky sexual ounselli,
acknowledgment status, PTSD symptoms, and coping strategies all impact a
woman’s experience after her sexual assault and lead to her becoming either a
survivor or a victim. A woman who has been sexually abused and is supported
by family and police; blames the perpetrator rather than herself; refrains from
substance use and alcohol abuse; does not engage in risky ounselli and utilizes
constructive coping strategies will be substantially less likely to be re-
victimized. Healthy management strategies can help a woman better understand
her victimization. In better understanding her victimization she has the potential
to live (survive) in a way that puts her less at risk for being re-victimized. A
person who does not understand her victimization has little potential to change
the circumstances she finds herself in and will remain at risk for re-
1
“FEMALE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER’S EXPERIENCE OF WORKPLACE HARASSMENT”(2018)
https://scholarshipworks.llib.csub.edu/etd/621
“NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY REPORT” (2018)
Compensation Scheme for Women Victims/Survivors of
Sexual Assault/other Crimes – 2018
www.nalsa.gov.in
16 | P a g e
victimization. There are two ways a woman can view her victimization: she can
be a survivor or a victim. A woman who is a survivor of sexual victimization has
learned to deal with her victimization in a positive way, rather than allow her
victimization to define who she is as a person. A woman who is a victim has not
yet learned to deal with her victimization in a positive way and allows her
victimization to define who she is. The terms “victim” and “survivor” are
utilized in many different areas of study, such as in domestic violence, sexual
abuse, and in the medical field in relation to cancer diagnoses. Throughout
various research studies, a woman with a victim mentality is described as being
powerless, hopeless, passive, feelings of worthlessness, and having a lack of
agency in the circumstances of her life (Dunn, 2005; Kuban & Steele, 2011;
Brosi & Rolling, 2010; Park, Zlateva & Blank, 2009). A survivor mentality is
depicted as a woman being empowered, creating a meaning out of her
experiences, being equipped with choice, participating in her own healing,
feeling safe and validated, having hope, and living after a traumatic experience
(Hunter, 2010; Kuban & Steele, 2011; Brosi & Rolling, 2010; Park et al., 2009).
In general, a victim mentality is when a person allows things to happen to
him/her; whereas a survivor mentality is when a person takes control of the
circumstances.2
RE-VICTIMIZATION DEFINED
17 | P a g e
victimization is most often defined as a subsequent abuse in the same violence
category (i.e. being sexually victimized and then being sexually victimized again
at a later time) (Barnes, Noll, Putnam, & Trickett, 2009; Ullman, 1996; Macy et
al., 2006; Ullman et al., 2008; Mason et al., 2009; Combs-Lane & Smith, 2002).
While some scholars agree on the definition of re-victimization, society as a
whole differs on what is classified as re-victimization. In this report, the term re-
victimization will refer to sexual victimization that occurs in more than one
incident.
SOCIAL SUPPORT3
3
(Stevens et al., 2005), (Maier, 2008, p. 787), (Barnes, Noll, Putnam, & Trickett, 2009; Ullman, 1996; Macy et al., 2006; Ullman et
al., 2008; Mason et al., 2009; Combs-Lane & Smith, 2002)
18 | P a g e
(Phanichrat & Townshend, 2010, p. 73). Rather, the victims suffer the abuse
without seeking social support.
Self-blame is tied to problem drinking, which will later be discussed as a
personal ounselli linked to re-victimization. However, problem drinking impacts
self-blame and the social reactions to a woman’s sexual assault. Self-blame and
problem drinking have a reciprocal relationship: women who blame themselves
for the sexual assault are more likely to have problem drinking and women who
have problem drinking are more likely to blame themselves for the sexual
assault (Macy et al., 2006; Ullman et al., 2008). Additionally, problem drinkers
who are victims of sexual assault disclosed their sexual assault to more formal
and informal support sources, resulting in more positive and negative social
reactions to their sexual assault (Ullman et al., 2008). For example, a woman
who tells her friends, parents, police, and peers about her sexual assault will
have more
reactions (negative and positive) from these people compared to a woman who
solely reports her victimization to one friend. Negative social reactions, such as
being treated differently, not being believed, and having someone take control,
were related to psychological symptoms and poor recovery from the sexual
assault (Ullman, 1996). Unfortunately, positive social reactions toward a victim
of sexual assault have had mixed results, whereas negative social reactions
(Borja, Callahan, & Long, 2006) and societal blame of the victim (Ullman,
1996) have had destructive effects on recovery. The pattern within these studies
is that victims who have self-blame and problem drinking are not given social
support, whether the lack of social support comes before or after the self-blame
and problem drinking is still to be determined. As a society, the mentality of
victim blame must shift to a mentality of assailant blame in an effort to help
evolve the recovery of the victim into the life of a survivor.
Social support alone has varied results. The type of social support sought by the
sexual assault victim has varying degrees of effectiveness. Almost three quarters
of respondents in a study on social support and sexual assault re-victimization
disclosed to formal and/or informal sources about the assault (Mason et al.,
2009). Of those sources, religious sources were rated as the most supportive by
nearly 80% of the respondents who disclosed to this source;
19 | P a g e
medical professionals, police, and parents were the least supportive– all were
rated as being helpful less than 60% of the time, according to those who
disclosed to this source (Mason et al., 2009). Though reasons for reporting to the
police vary, the most common reason women reported their sexual assault to the
police was the desire to prevent their offender from raping another woman or
themselves (Patterson & Campbell, 2010).
Interestingly, re-victimized survivors were less likely to disclose to parents,
police, and rape crisis centers than non-re-victimized survivors (Mason et al.,
2009). Even though police, medical professionals, and parents were considered
least supportive, victims who disclosed to these sources were less likely to be re-
victimized, leading to the conclusion that these sources were actually the most
helpful. Women who felt they were listened to had fewer psychological
symptoms and better recovery from the sexual assault (Ullman, 1996).
“Survivors who receive less positive support in the form of information and
emotional support may be more susceptible to being reassaulted” (Mason et al.,
2009, p. 69).
PERSONAL BEHAVIOUR
PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH
As much of the literature has found, the factors that contribute to re-
victimization are interlinked. The psychological health of a woman who
experienced sexual assault is no exception. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
(PTSD) is intertwined with many other factors associated with re-victimization,
including social support, risky personal ounselli, risky sexual ounselli, and
acknowledgement status. In their study on social support and sexual assault re-
victimization, Mason et al. (2009) found that re-victimized participants had
significantly higher PTSD symptom severity scores than non-re-victimized
participants. PTSD is related to alcohol consumption and social reactions.
Ullman et al. (2008) found that problem drinkers had higher levels of PTSD
symptoms; additionally, participants who exhibited PTSD symptoms had more
negative social reactions. Those with PTSD symptoms disclosed their sexual
assault more often, and, in turn, received more negative social reactions;
however this disclosure may not have occurred directly after the assault and
delayed disclosure was related to more severe PTSD symptoms (Ullman et al.,
2008). Those who acknowledged their victimization were more likely to exhibit
greater PTSD symptomology (Littleton et al., 2009; Layman et al., 1996). Of the
acknowledged victims, 19% experienced an attempted rape and 31%
experienced a completed rape within a six-month follow-up period (Littleton et
al., 2009).
22 | P a g e
PTSD is highly associated with re-victimization as well as many other factors
also linked with re-victimization. Substance use and sexual ounselli was
predicted by PTSD symptomology; in this study the women who experienced
PTSD symptoms may have engaged in substance use or risky sexual ounselli to
reduce the stress (Messman-Moore et al., 2009). Both PTSD symptoms and
substance use was a factor highly associated with re-victimization; however, the
causal relationship between substance use and PTSD symptoms is unknown
(Messman-Moore et al., 2009). The women experiencing PTSD symptoms were
more likely to engage in risky sexual ounselli, which is linked to re-victimization
(Fargo, 2009). Perhaps it is necessary to address the PTSD symptoms of women
who have experienced sexual assault to better understand other issues such as
alcohol consumption, negative social reactions, acknowledgement status,
substance use, and risky sexual ounselli.
PTSD is highly associated with re-victimization as well as many other factors
also linked with re-victimization. Substance use and sexual ounselli was
predicted by PTSD symptomology; in this study the women who experienced
PTSD symptoms may have engaged in substance use or risky sexual ounselli to
reduce the stress (Messman-Moore et al., 2009). Both PTSD symptoms and
substance use was a factor highly associated with re-victimization; however, the
causal relationship between substance use and PTSD symptoms is unknown
(Messman-Moore et al., 2009). The women experiencing PTSD symptoms were
more likely to engage in risky sexual ounselli, which is linked to re-victimization
(Fargo, 2009). Perhaps it is necessary to address the PTSD symptoms of women
who have experienced sexual assault to better understand other issues such as
alcohol consumption, negative social reactions, acknowledgement status,
substance use, and risky sexual ounselli. After a person has been sexually
assaulted there are limitless ways to cope with the traumatic event. People can
cope in two broad categories: constructively or destructively. Constructive
coping strategies are aimed at gaining family and social support, whereas
destructive coping strategies include increased drinking, smoking, or staying
away from friends and family members (He, Zhao, & Ren, 2005). In a study on
the role of coping strategies in relation to sexual abuse and re-victimization,
coping was defined as “cognitions reflecting a desire to avoid” (Fortier et al.,
23 | P a g e
2009, p. 316). Avoidant coping is the most frequent strategy used by childhood
sexual abuse survivors (Sigmon, Greene, Rohan, & Nichols, 1996). As severity
of childhood sexual abuse and trauma symptoms increased, avoidant coping
increased (Fortier et al., 2009). The level of childhood sexual abuse severity
predicts avoidant coping, which predicts trauma symptoms, which predicts re-
victimization severity (Fortier et al., 2009). Another study by Phanichrat and
Townshend (2010) on coping strategies utilized by victims of sexual assault
found that avoidance coping is characterized by three themes: suppression of
thoughts and feelings, escapism, and dissociation. Suppression of thoughts and
feelings included: denial, keeping busy, substance abuse, alcohol, and self-harm.
Escapism is a conscious process that included: hiding, running away, finding a
safe place, and attempted suicide. Dissociation is an unconscious process that
includes floating off, disconnection, and forgetfulness. All participants in this
study undertook avoidance coping prior to utilizing problem-focused coping (a
more healthy form of coping). Problem focused coping can be separated into
four categories: seeking support, cognitive engagement, acceptance, and seeking
meaning. Seeking support included: sharing with others, disclosure, joining
survivors groups, and spiritual support. Cognitive engagement included:
reframing, self-reflective strategies, positive thinking, and external attribution of
abuse responsibility. Acceptance included: self-acceptance, acceptance of the
abuse, and life-long process of coping. Seeking meaning included: helping
others/survivors and advocacy. Avoidant coping was a temporary necessity to
prepare the participants to cope with the sexual abuse in a healthy manner
(Phanichrat & Townshend, 2010).
Sexual assault can have a significant effect on the way a woman views herself
and her actions in the future, contributing to her self-perception as a victim or
survivor. Niehaus et al. (2010) found that childhood sexual abuse has an
emotional impact on the survivor and can affect the way she views her sexuality.
Survivors were more likely than non-victims to have a negative perception of
their own sexuality (i.e. describing their sexual ounselli as immoral or dirty
rather than passionate and loving); yet survivors were “less inhibited and more
likely to approach rather than avoid sexuality and sexual situations when
compared to nonvictims” (Niehaus et al., 2010, p. 1370). As has been discussed
24 | P a g e
above, engaging in greater amounts of sexual activity increases the risk of re-
victimization. Therefore, the way a person views herself and her sexuality after
her initial sexual assault can be an influential factor in re-victimization.
CONCLUSION
The literature has demonstrated that the factors that contribute to re-
victimization are extremely complex and interrelated. Each element linked with
re-victimization is correlated to another element linked with re-victimization;
however, there has not been a study conducted that involves all of these factors.
Therefore, it is important to discover which factors are the most important and
which factors combined together most significantly influences re-victimization.
The purpose of this study is to discover if overall healthy management strategies
help a woman better understand her victimization, live in a way that puts her less
at risk for being victimized, and view herself as a survivor rather than a victim.
The self-perception as survivor and healthy management strategies may insulate
a woman from re-victimization.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Several research questions can stem from the previous literature presented. The
literature clearly illustrates that numerous factors (i.e. social support (Macy et
al., 2006; Phanichrat & Townshend, 2010; Niehaus et al., 2010), self-blame
(Burt. 1980), disclosure (Ullman et al., 2008; Ullman, 1996; Mason et al., 2009),
alcohol abuse (Kilpatrick et al., 1997; Koss & Dinero, 1989; Combs-Lane &
Smith, 2002; Fargo, 2009), substance use (Kilpatrick et al., 1997), risk taking
ounselli (Fargo, 2009; Messman-Moore et al., 2009), risky sexual ounselli
(Niehaus et al., 2010), acknowledgement status (Littleton et al., 2009), PTSD
symptoms (Messman-Moore et al., 2009; Fortier et al., 2009), and coping
strategies (Phanichrat & Townshend, 2010) can influence re-victimization.
There are two major research questions to be asked in this qualitative research,
which are directly related to the relationship between re-victimization and
victim/survivor status.
25 | P a g e
Research Question 1: Is a woman with a survivor mentality of her sexual assault
protected from re-victimization?
Research Question 2: Is a woman with a victim mentality of her sexual assault
vulnerable to re-victimization?
For this research, the terms “victim” and “survivor” will be defined based on the
descriptions used throughout various research studies. A woman with a victim
mentality is defined as being powerless, hopeless, passive, feelings of
worthlessness, and having a lack of agency in the circumstances of her life
(Dunn, 2005; Kuban & Steele, 2011; Brosi & Rolling, 2010; Park et al., 2009).
4
In summary, a person with a victim mentality allows things to happen to her. A
survivor mentality is defined as a woman being empowered, creating a meaning
out of her experiences, being equipped with choice, participating in her own
healing, feeling safe and validated, having hope, and living after a traumatic
experience (Hunter, 2010; Kuban & Steele, 2011; Brosi & Rolling, 2010; Park et
al., 2009). In other terms, a person with a survivor mentality takes control of the
circumstances of her life.
4
A survivor’s mentality(Dunn, 2005; Kuban & Steele, 2011; Brosi & Rolling, 2010; Park et al., 2009)(e-book), women against
sexual assault (Hunter, 2010; Kuban & Steele, 2011; Brosi & Rolling, 2010; Park et al., 2009)(e-book),self support (Macy et al.,
2006; Phanichrat & Townshend, 2010; Niehaus et al., 2010(e-book)
26 | P a g e
CHAPTER THREE
METHODS
SAMPLING/PARTICIPANTS
The purpose of this study is to obtain in-depth interviews and ferret out central
themes of how outside factors affected the victim herself, how these aspects
influenced her perception of herself, and which factors she believes had the most
significant impact on her re-victimization or non-re-victimization. The
participants in this study are women who have been sexually assaulted or raped
and women who have been re-victimized (or sexually assaulted or raped on
more than one occasion). These women were selected through snowball
sampling and found through various means. Psychologists, sexual assault
victim’s advocates, and personal acquaintances were asked to inquire if the
sexual assault victims were willing to participate in a confidential survey. The
research sought to obtain a survey representative of the women within the
sampling frame. The sampling frame is women who have been sexually
victimized and re-victimized. Snowball sampling is one method to find victims
of a crime that is not openly discussed and often bound by confidentiality
(Patten, 2009). Each woman participating in the survey was distributed a
demographic survey and interviewed by me. In ethnographic research, or
participant research with in depth interviews, the participants are typically few in
number (Hughes, King, Rodden, & Andersen, 1995). This research’s goal is to
gather in-depth interviews from twenty women participants in total to discover
their personal stories of sexual assault.5
INTERVIEW SCHEDULE
5
Few women (Hughes, King, Rodden, & Andersen, 1995)(e-book).
27 | P a g e
The materials to be used in the research experiment are relatively few. One of
the materials used was previous literature. Through the literature, many
questions about the women’s perceptions of her sexual assault arose. The
previous research facilitated the discovery of different interview questions to be
asked.
Another material used was a mobile phone as a recording device. An important
aspect of the interview process is recording the interview either through the use
of a voice recorder, thorough note taking, or a combination of the two; some
participants may initially be uneasy with the recorder, but later become more
comfortable with the device (Francis, 2004). The use of a recorder allowed me to
return to the interview when ounselli certain themes at a later stage of the
research process (Francis, 2004). The interviewee was asked if she had any
issues with being recorded throughout the interview, informed that any questions
could be skipped if necessary, and, most importantly, that the interview could be
terminated at any time (see Appendix C). The interviewee was provided a list of
emergency contacts with professionals who are available to them 24 hours a day
(see Appendix D). The interview process was recorded, including the questions
asked and the answers given by the respondents. The tape recorder was set up
directly between the interviewer and the interviewee. The interview asks
questions about the women’s perception of the important factors that influenced
her re-victimization or non-re-victimization, including: social support, alcohol
use, substance use, personal ounselli, and psychological health. No other
technical equipment was used throughout the interview process.
DESIGN
Though quantitative research provides more data, it typically provides more data
that is not as in-depth and personal as qualitative research, especially when
discussing highly personal topics such as sexual assault and rape, and the factors
that may have contributed to re-victimization (Babbie, 2005). In-depth
interviews are useful because they “allow for exploration, reflexivity, creativity,
mutual exchange and interaction” between the researcher and the participants
(Caine, Davison, & Stewart, 2009, p. 489). For these reasons, this research study
28 | P a g e
is constructed as qualitative research, rather than quantitative research. The
purpose of this research is to discover personal stories and the women’s
perception of her victimization. Qualitative research was chosen for this research
project because the in-depth interviews with these women produces original
answers that cannot be predicted and incorporated into a multiple choice
questionnaire (that a quantitative study would employ).
Conducting interviews produces a better understanding of the women’s
experience of sexual assault or rape because every incident is different and
unique. The story-telling nature of qualitative research is more desirable in
understanding the woman’s sexual victimization and the factors that lead to her
re-victimization or lack thereof. When a factor appears to be important, more
time can be spent on that topic or if a factor is not as applicable to a certain
person that factor can be discussed to a lesser degree and the interview
continued. The disadvantages of using a qualitative research technique are the
limited number of interviews that can be conducted because of time, access, and
monetary limits. This research is exploratory in nature and can be utilized to
shape future quantitative research. It is generalizable to populations who have
been sexually assaulted on one or more occasions. Table 1 below describes the
design and rationale for developing the questionnaire I used when interviewing
the participants.
5. What types of people did you tell? Mason et al., This study discusses various different
29 | P a g e
Friends, family, police, rape 2009 forms of social support, how helpful the
crisis centers? women perceived these disclosures and
repeated victimization rates. Women
perceived informal social support to be
more helpful; however, women who
disclosed to formal
social support systems were less likely to
be re-victimized.
6. How did those you told react to your Ullman, 1996; Ullman’s study shows that
disclosure? Borja et al., 2006; negative social reactions lead to poor
Mason et al., recovery from the assault. Borja’s study
shows that positive social reactions had
2009
mixed results with neutral and+ve effects
on recovery.Mason’sstudy suggests that
women who receive less positive social
support may be more likely to be re-
victimized.
7. In what ways did each of their reactions Ullman, 1996; This study shows that negative social
affect you? If it was a positive reaction, Borja et al., reactions lead to poor recovery from the
how did it help you? If it was a negative assault. Borja’s study shows positive social
2006
reaction, how did it impact you? reactions had mixed results with neutral
and positive effects on recovery. Mason’s
study suggests that women who have less
positive social support may be more likely
to be re-victimized.
8. What types of ways did you deal with Macy et al., 2006; These studies suggest that selfblame leads
your first sexual assault? Ullman et al., to re-victimization. This question allows
2008; Phanichrat the participant the opportunity to provide
& Townshend, her own perception of how she coped with
2010 the trauma.
9. Do you feel there is anything that could Macy et al., 2006; Macy’s study found that placing the blame
have been done that may have made you Ullman et al., on the assailant has significant positive
less likely a target for sexual assault? 2008; Phanichrat effects on the
& Townshend, woman during and after sexual aggression
2010 and women who place blame on herself
are more likely to be re-victimized.
Ullman’s study found that women who
place blame on herself have more negative
social reactions. Phanichrat’s study
suggests that the stigma of abuse and fear
of
rejection and public perception may inhibit
a victim from disclosing their assault.
10. Thinking back, is there anything you Macy et al., 2006; Macy’s study found that placing the blame
believe you could have done to prevent the Ullman et al., on the assailant has significant positive
assault? 2008; Phanichrat effects on the
& Townshend, woman during and after sexual aggression
2010 and women who place blame on herself
are more likely to be re-victimized.
Ullman’s study found that women who
place blame on herself have more negative
social reactions. Phanichrat’s study
suggests that the stigma of abuse and fear
of
rejection and public perception may inhibit
a victim from disclosing their assault.
11. Initially, who did you think was Macy et al., 2006; Macy’s study found that placing the blame
30 | P a g e
responsible for the assault? Has that Ullman et al., on the assailant has significant positive
changed for you today? 2008; Phanichrat effects on the
& Townshend, woman during and after sexual aggression
2010 and women who place blame on herself
are more likely to be re-victimized.
Ullman’s study found that women who
place blame on herself have more negative
social reactions. Phanichrat’s study
suggests that the stigma of abuse and fear
of rejection and public perception may
inhibit a victim from disclosing their
assault.6
12. 14 Did your personal ounselli remain Fargo, 2009; Fargo’s study found that risky ounselli and
the same as prior to your first sexual Messman-Moore risky sexual ounselli were linked to re-
assault or did it change? What is your et al., 2010 victimization. Messman’s study found
typical ounselli? emotion dysregulation influenced risky
sexual behaviour and number of lifetime
sexual intercourse partners and increased
vulnerability for
re-victimization.
13. 15 After your first sexual Combs-Lane & Smith, 2002; Comb’s study stated that one way to
victimization, did you intend on drinking Fargo, 2009; indicate re-victimization may be to
heavily? Engaging in sexual ounselli? Kilpatrick et al.,1997 question victims of their intentions to be
Participate in activities involving exposure involved in risky behaviors. Fargo’s study
to potential perpetrators? found women who knew they would
engage in risky behaviors were actually
involved in more risky
behaviors.Kilpatrick’s study suggested that
women who are in contact with drug
dealers are more likely to be re-victimized
because they are around potential
predators.
14. 16 How has being a victim of sexual Fargo, 2009; Messman- These studies all discuss sexual ounselli
assault impacted your sexual ounselli? Moore et al., 2010; and re-victimization and this question
Combs-Lane & Smith, 2002; allows the respondent to give and account
Kilpatrick et al.,1997 of how the sexual assault impacted her
sexual ounselli.
LIMITATIONS
CHAPTER FOUR
RESULT
INTRODUCTION TO PARTICIPANTS
INTRODUCTION TO RESULTS
8
Assault after effects Fargo, 2009; Messman-Moore et al., 2010;(e-book)
35 | P a g e
I have stated and mentioned in this dissertation work 10 interviews out of 20
interviews which I have conducted with 20 women who have previously been
raped or sexually assaulted on one or more than one occasion. Of those 20
women, 15 were re-victimized and only 5 were victimized on one occasion.
Within the group, there were a total of 27 re-victimizations; meaning, there was
a total of 47 sexual assaults or rapes amongst the 20 women. Out of all 47 sexual
assaults or rapes, only two qualify as stranger rape. In all other instances, the
woman was familiar with the perpetrator in some aspect. He may have been a
relative, a friend, or an acquaintance. There was a significant difference in the
average age of the victim and the average age of the perpetrator. Many of the
women were victimized during their childhood; however, many of the men who
victimized them were much older. The youngest woman who was victimized
was 2 1/2 years old and the oldest woman victimized was 27 years old. The
average age of victimization was 12.65 years old. The youngest perpetrator was
13 years old and the oldest perpetrator was about 65 years old. The average age
of the perpetrator was 31.8 years old. The average age difference between the
victim and perpetrator was 19.19 years. On average, the perpetrator was 19 years
older than the woman he victimized. There was only one case in which the
perpetrator was younger than the victim. In this instance, the victim was 20 years
old and the perpetrator was 19 years old.
Throughout the interviews, four categories became evident. The four categories
are as follows: victim thoughts, survivor thoughts, reasons for re-victimization,
and reasons for non-re-victimization. Table 4 on page 68 is a chart that
summarizes each woman and her status as victim, survivor, or a person who
transformed from a victim to a survivor. It also describes how each woman was
linked to that category.
VICTIM’S THOUGHT
The women in the study had both victim thoughts and survivor thoughts. Some
women had only victim thoughts, some women only had survivor thoughts,
while other women had victim thoughts at one point in her life and then had a
transformation where she began developing survivor thoughts.
36 | P a g e
BELIEVED SHE DESERVED IT
The sexual assault affected women in regard to how they view themselves and
their emotional health as well. Five women reported feeling dirty or disgusting.
Eight had feelings of low self-esteem. Bilquis, who was sexually assaulted by
her step-father and raped by her husband, said, “Boys told me they wanted to put
a bag over my head and screw me” (Bilquis, personal communication,
November 2013). Six women felt numb inside. Stacy, for example, whose
physically abusive husband raped her, said she felt numb inside and simply went
through the motions. Five women dissociated themselves from the event. Six
were insecure. Ruby, who was sexually assaulted on five occasions, said, “I
became very insecure; I became the girl that everyone liked to pick on … the
loser” (Ruby, personal communication, February 2013). One woman was
nervous and one was depressed. Self-blame was a prominent negative
37 | P a g e
consequence of the assault; a startling twelve women blamed herself for the
assault in some aspect. Vandana, at
13 years old ran into the bathroom in an attempt to escape her two 13 year
oldassailants, said the sexual assault changed her perception of herself
becauseshe “felt crappy and ashamed” (Vandana, personal communication,
August 2013).These thoughts of self-blame, numbness, dissociation, insecurity,
and low selfesteem are evidence of a woman with a victim mentality.
SEXUAL REMISSION
SURVIVOR’S THOUGHT
9
Personal interviews of assaulted and victimized women
41 | P a g e
10
CHAPTER FIVE
ARTICLES AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS
INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in W.P. (C) No. 565/2012 titled Nipun Saxena
Vs. Union of India opined that “it would be appropriate if NALSA sets up a
Committee of about 4 or 5 persons who can prepare Model Rules for Victim
Compensation for sexual offences and acid attacks taking into account the
submissions made by the learned Amicus. The learned Amicus as well as the
learned Solicitor General have offered to assist the Committee as and when
required. The Chairperson or the nominee of the Chairperson of the National
Commission for Women should be associated with the Committee.”
The Committee held rounds of meetings and it was decided to prepare a separate
“Chapter” or a “Sub-Scheme” within the existing Victim Compensation Scheme
for victims of sexual assault.
The Committee drafted Part – II of the Victims Compensation Scheme and
invited suggestions/comments from various stakeholders on the draft. Taking
into consideration the suggestions/comments, the Committee has finalized the
Compensation Scheme for women Victims/Survivors of Sexual
Assault/other Crimes and submitted the same before the Hon’ble Supreme
Court of India on 24.04.2018.
Submissions were made before the Hon’ble Bench and other stakeholders were
also heard on 10.05.2018. Additional suggestions received during the hearing
10
www.nalsa.gov.in, nalsa-dla@nic.in
42 | P a g e
were also incorporated and final Scheme was filed before the Hon’ble Supreme
Court of India on 11.05.2018. On this day, after hearing NALSA and Ld.
Amicus Curiae, Hon’ble Bench was pleased to accept this Scheme and directed
all the State Governments/UT Administrations to implement the same in their
respective States/UTs.
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India further observed that while nothing should be
taken away from this Scheme, but it does not preclude the State
Governments/UT Administrations from adding to the Scheme.
11
(1) This Chapter may be called the Compensation Scheme for Women
Victims/Survivors of Sexual Assault/other Crimes, 2018.
(2) It shall come into force on the date as and when ordered by Hon’ble Supreme
Court of India.
(3) It shall apply to the victims and their dependent(s) who have suffered loss,
injury, as the case may be, as a result of the offence committed and who require
rehabilitation.
11
www.nalsa.gov.in, nalsa-dla@nic.in
43 | P a g e
2. DEFINITIONS
(c) “District Legal Services Authority” means the District Legal Services
Authority (DLSA)constituted under section 9 of the Legal Services Authorities
Act, 1987(Act 39 of 1987) for a District of the National Capital Territory of
Delhi;
(d) ‘Form’ means form appended to the Scheme as applicable to this Chapter.
(e) ‘Fund’ means State fund i.e. victim compensation fund constituted under the
State Victim Compensation Scheme.
(f) ‘Central Fund’ means funds received from CVCF Scheme, 2015.
44 | P a g e
Fund apart from funds received from the State Victim Compensation Fund
which shall be utilised only for victims covered under this Chapter]
(h) ‘Government’ means ‘State Government’ wherever the State Victim
Compensation Scheme or the State Victim Compensation Fund is in context and
‘Central Government’ wherever Central Government Victim Compensation
Fund Scheme is in context and includes UTs.
(i) ‘Injury’ means any harm caused to body or mind of a female.
(j) ‘Minor’ means a girl child who has not completed the age of 18 years.
(k) ‘Offence’ means offence committed against women punishable under IPC or
any other law.
(l) ‘Penal Code’ means Indian Penal Code, 1860 (45 of 1860);
(n) “State Legal Services Authority” means the State Legal Services Authority
(SLSA), as defined in Section 6 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (39
of 1987)
(o) ‘Sexual Assault Victims” means female who has suffered mental or physical
injury or both as a result of sexual offence including Sections 376 (A) to (E),
Section 354 (A) to (D), Section 509 IPC.
(p) ‘Woman Victim/ survivor of other crime’ means a woman who has
suffered physical or mental injury as a result of any offence mentioned in the
attached Schedule including Sections 304 B, Section 326A, Section 498A IPC
(in case of physical injury of the nature specified in the schedule) including the
attempts and abetment.
45 | P a g e
(2) Words and expressions used in this Chapter and not defined here, shall have
the same meaning as assigned to them in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
or/and the Indian Penal Code, 1860.12
(1) There shall be a Fund, namely, the Women Victims Compensation Fund
from which the amount of compensation, as decided by the State Legal Services
Authority or District Legal Services Authority, shall be paid to the women
victim or her dependent(s) who have suffered loss or injury as a result of an
offence and who require rehabilitation.
(2) The ‘Women Victims Compensation Fund’ shall comprise the following:-
(a) Contribution received from CVCF Scheme, 2015.
(b) Budgetary allocation in the shape of Grants-in-aid to SLSA for which
necessary provision shall be made in the Annual Budget by the Government;
(c) Any cost amount ordered by Civil/Criminal Tribunal to be deposited in this
Fund.
(d) Amount of compensation recovered from the wrong doer/accused under
clause 14 of the Scheme;
(e) Donations/contributions from International/ National/ Philanthropist/
Charitable Institutions/ Organizations and individuals permitted by State or
Central Government.
(f) Contributions from companies under CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility)
(3) The said Fund shall be operated by the State Legal Services Authority
(SLSA).
12
www.nalsa.gov.in, nalsa-dla@nic.in
46 | P a g e
A woman victim or her dependent (s) as the case may be, shall be eligible for
grant of compensation from multiple schemes applicable to her. However, the
compensation received by her in the other schemes with regard to Section 357-B
Cr.P.C., shall be taken into account while deciding the quantum in the such
subsequent application.
47 | P a g e
Explanation: In case of acid attack victim the deciding authority shall be
Criminal Injury Compensation Board as directed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in
Laxmi vs. Union of India W.P.CRML 129/2006 order dated 10.04.2015 which
includes Ld. District & Sessions Judge, DM, SP, Civil Surgeon/CMO of the
district.
(1) Gravity of the offence and severity of mental or physical harm or injury
suffered by the victim;
(4) Loss of employment as a result of the offence, including absence from place
of employment due to mental trauma, bodily injury, medical treatment,
investigation and trial of the offence, or any other reason;
(7) Whether victim became pregnant as a result of the offence, whether she had
to undergo Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP)/ give birth to a child,
including rehabilitation needs of such child;
(11) Financial condition of the victim against whom the offence has been
committed so as to determine her need for rehabilitation and re-integration needs
of the victim.
(12) In case of death, the age of deceased, her monthly income, number of
dependents, life expectancy, future promotional/growth prospects etc.
(13) Or any other factor which the SLSA/DLSA may consider just and
sufficient.13
(3) After consideration of the matter, the SLSA or DLSA, as the case may be,
upon its satisfaction, shall decide the quantum of compensation to be awarded to
the victim or her dependent(s) taking into account the factors enumerated in
Clause 8 of the Scheme, as per schedule appended to this chapter. However, in
deserving cases, for reasons to be recorded, the upper limit may be exceeded.
Moreover, in case the victim is minor, the limit of compensation shall be deemed
to be 50% higher than the amount mentioned in the Schedule appended to this
chapter.
* Victims of Acid attack are also entitled to additional compensation of Rs. 1 lac
under Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund vide memorandum no.
24013/94/Misc./2014-CSR-III/GoI/MHA dated 09.11.2016(copy attached)
50 | P a g e
Victims of Acid Attack are also entitled to additional special financial assistance
up to Rs. 5 lacs who need treatment expenses over and above the compensation
paid by the respective State/UTs in terms of Central Victim Compensation Fund
Guidelines-2016, no. 24013/94/Misc/2014-CSR.III, MHA/GoI
(4) The SLSA/DLSA may call from any record or take assistance from any
Authority/Establishment/Individual/ Police/Court concerned or expert for
smooth implementation of the Scheme.
(5) In case trial/appellate court gives findings that the criminal complaint and the
allegation were false, then Legal Services Authority may initiate proceedings for
recovery of compensation, if any, granted in part or full under this Scheme,
before the Trial Court for its recovery as if it were a fine.14
10. THE ORDER TO BE PLACED ON RECORD—
Copy of the order of interim or final compensation passed under this Scheme
shall be placed on record of the trial Court so as to enable the trial Court to pass
an appropriate order of compensation under Section 357 of the Code. A true
copy of the order shall be provided to the IO in case the matter is pending
investigation and also to the victim/dependent as the case may be. 11.
51 | P a g e
cards. Interim amount shall be disbursed in full. However, as far as the final
compensation amount is concerned, 75% (seventy five percent) of the same shall
be put in a fixed deposit for a minimum period of three years and the remaining
25% (twenty five percent) shall be available for utilization and initial expenses
by the victim/dependent(s), as the case may be.
(2) In the case of a minor, 80% of the amount of compensation so awarded, shall
be deposited in the fixed deposit account and shall be drawn only on attainment
of the age of majority, but not before three years of the deposit. Provided that in
exceptional cases, amounts may be withdrawn for educational or medical or
other pressing and urgent needs of the beneficiary at the discretion of the SLSA/
DLSA.
(3) The interest on the sum, if lying in FDR form, shall be credited directly by
the bank in the savings account of the victim/dependent(s), on monthly basis
which can be withdrawn by the beneficiary
52 | P a g e
Provided further that in cases of acid attack a sum of Rs. One lakh shall be paid
to the victim within 15 days of the matter being brought to the notice of
SLSA/DLSA. The order granting interim compensation shall be passed by the
SLSA/DLSA within 7 days of the matter being brought to its notice and the
SLSA shall pay the compensation within 8 days of passing of order. Thereafter
an additional sum of Rs.2 lakhs shall be awarded and paid to the victim as
expeditiously as possible and positively within two months.
Subject to the provisions of sub-section (3) of Section 357A of the Code, the
State Legal Services Authority, in proper cases, may institute proceedings before
the competent court of law for recovery of the compensation granted to the
victim or her dependent(s) from person(s) responsible for causing loss or injury
as a result of the crime committed by him/her. The amount, so recovered, shall
be deposited in Woman Victim Compensation Fund.
The authority empowered to issue the dependency certificate shall issue the
same within a period of fifteen days and, in no case, this period shall be
extended: Provided that the SLSA/DLSA, in case of non-issuance of
Dependency Certificate, after expiry of 15 days, may proceed on the basis of an
affidavit to be obtained from the claimant.
53 | P a g e
Superintendent, Child Care Institutions where the child is lodged or in absence
thereof, DDO/SDM, as the case may be.
16. LIMITATION-
Under the Scheme, no claim made by the victim or her dependent(s), under sub-
section (4) of Section 357A of the Code, shall be entertained after a period of 3
years from the date of occurrence of the offence or conclusion of the trial.
However, in deserving cases, on an application made in this regard, for reasons
to be recorded, the delay beyond three years can be condoned by the
SLSAs/DLSAs.
17. APPEAL:
In case the victim or her dependents are not satisfied with the quantum of
compensation awarded by the Secretary, DLSA, they can file appeal within 30
days from the date of receipt of order before the Chairperson, DLSA.
Provided that, delay in filing appeal may be condoned by the Appellate
Authority, for reasons to be recorded, in deserving cases, on an application made
in this regard.
(1) In case this Chapter is silent on any issue pertaining to Victim Compensation
to Women, the provisions of Victim Compensation Scheme of the State would
be applicable.
(2) Nothing in this Scheme shall prevent Victims or their dependents from
instituting any Civil Suit or Claim against the perpetrator of offence or any other
person indirectly responsible for the same.
54 | P a g e
Explanation: It is clarified that this Chapter does not apply to minor victims
under POCSO Act, 2012 in so far as their compensation issues are to be dealt
with only by the Ld. Special Courts under Section 33 (8) of POCSO Act, 2012
and Rules (7) of the POCSO Rules, 2012.
FORM –I
APPLICATION FOR THE AWARD OF COMPENSATION UNDER COMPENSATION
SCHEME FOR WOMEN VICTIMS/SURVIVORS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT/OTHER CRIMES,
2018 FOR INTERIM/FINAL RELIEF FOR WOMEN
15
NALSA’s “Compensation Scheme for women Victims/Survivors of Sexual Assault/other Crimes -2018”
56 | P a g e
(ARTICLE)
STOPPING RAPE
Towards a comprehensive policy
By “Sylvia Walby, Philippa Olive, Jude Towers, Brian Francis, Sofia Strid, Andrea Krizsán, Emanuela
Lombardo, Corinne May-Chahal, Suzanne Franzway, David Sugarman, Bina Agarwal and Jo Armstrong”
( I will just use some of the content to the above article to support my research)
INTRODUCTION
Rape shatters lives. Its traumatising effects can linger for many years after the
immediate pain and suffering. Rape is a consequence and a cause of gender inequality.
It is an injury to health; a crime; a violation of women’s human rights; and costly to
both the economy and society. Stopping rape requires changes to many policies and
practices. There is no simple solution; rather, a myriad of reforms are needed to prevent
rape. New policies are being innovated around the world, north and south, which are
often intended to prevent rape and to support victims/survivors simultaneously. This
book provides an overview of the current best practice from around the world for
ending rape. In order to prevent rape, it is necessary to know what causes rape. The
57 | P a g e
selection of the examples of good and promising practice in this book is guided by a
theory of the causes of rape. The causal pathways that lead to rape involve many of
society’s institutions. These pathways are embedded in the state and public services,
including the criminal justice system and healthcare; culture, media and education; in
other forms and contexts of violence; and in the economy. Stopping rape requires the
effective mobilisation of all of these actors and institutions. It is not a single institution
that needs to change, however: most social institutions need reform, and society needs
transforming. Prevention is not a simple matter of changing attitudes such as by
‘educating’ boys, although every reform makes a contribution. Preventing rape
requires reforms in the many institutions that make up the social system. This, in
turn, requires the deepening of the gender dimension of democracy, and a
reduction in overall gender inequalities. The enormity of the task of preventing
rape does not make it impossible. Stopping rape can be achieved step by step. In
order to achieve this goal we need institutions that support the health and welfare
of victims, deliver justice, deepen democracy, reduce gender inequalities, and
reduce other forms of violence, as well as cultural change. The theories,
evidence and practice presented in this book are a contribution to the knowledge
base needed to prevent rape.
This book is concerned with ‘what works’ to prevent rape. It identifies and
evaluates recent strategies and policy practices from around the world, including
the UK and the European Union (EU), drawing on the international academic
and policy literature. Preventing rape requires reforms to policies for major
institutions concerned with: strategy, planning and coordination; victim and
healthcare services; law and the criminal justice system; conflict zones; culture,
media and education; and the economy. Separate chapters of the book address
the reforms needed in each of these policy fields.
The strategic development of effective policy to stop rape requires both the
development of specialist expertise and for actions by mainstream institutions to be
routinely informed by such expertise. The concept and practice of ‘gender
mainstreaming’ was developed when it was recognised that effective policy
development for gender equality required both the development of specialist expertise,
and also that normal policy actors incorporate these new practices into their mainstream
work. There is often a tension between the specialist expertise and the mainstream, but
this is, or at least can be, productive of deep positive changes in a broad range of policy
developments. The concept of ‘mainstreaming’ is applied here to the policy and
practices needed to stop rape. There needs to be both specialist units focused on the
development of expertise in stopping rape, and also the application of this expert
knowledge by normal policy actors in a wide range of mainstream policy domains. •
Coordination of service provision: the multiplicity of responses from a myriad of
specialist and mainstream services requires coordination at national and local level in
order to be effective. There is a need for national-level coordination and funding of
policies, and also local-level cooperation of the services needed to serve victims. At the
local level, services need coordination in order to ensure that a focus on the needs of the
victim is achieved. The international and regional levels are important for exchanging
best practice.
• Specialised services for victim-survivors: The development of specialised services
focused on the needs of the victimsurvivors is very important.
• Research, data and statistics: strategic planning requires a knowledge base to provide
the evidence to evaluate policy developments. It requires research, data and statistics.
Policies need to be assessed to find out ‘what works’ best in particular locations. It is
necessary to know how frequent rape is and how it is patterned, which requires
59 | P a g e
population surveys. It is necessary to know how successful services are in their specific
contribution to the stopping of rape, which requires relevant administrative data. It is
necessary to develop theories, tested against evidence, as to what causes rape in order to
help theevaluation of what is effective in preventing rape.
• Deepening gendered democracy: the development of a viable strategy to prevent rape
requires the deepening of gendered democracy, reducing the gender imbalance in
decisionmaking, so that women as well as men have an effective voice in the myriad of
relevant institutions where decisions are made as to policy priorities. This includes the
voices of those who have suffered rape. Deepening the gender dimension of democracy
is part of the overarching strategy to develop the institutions, policies and practices
needed to stop rape. It is unlikely that this can be achieved without a reduction in
overall gender inequality.
It is important to look after the victim-survivors. The hurt and harms from rape
are considerable and often long lasting. It is possible to mitigate the effects of
rape by good practice, speeding healing and recovery. This is potentially offered
both by specialised standalone support services and by expert practices based
within mainstream health services. The health system is potentially an important
source of assistance to victims of rape, helping them to recover, but, if poorly
organised, it may exacerbate the problem. Looking after the victims of rape is
not only important in its own right, but it also contributes to the effectiveness of
preventative practices, for example, by helping victim-survivors to endure the
gruelling processes of the criminal justice system to secure the convictions
necessary to remove impunity from rapists. Survivors of rape also have the
potential to contribute knowledge to assist the development of the best form of
services for victims, to educate the public in the realities of rape, and to
contribute to the improvement of policies. Strengthening the ability of victim-
survivors to contribute to these processes of deterrence, public education and
policy reform is important for the prevention of rape in the future.
60 | P a g e
Rape is illegal in most places in the world, but the implementation of laws
against rape is notoriously inadequate and still needs reform. The purpose of the
criminal justice system is to stop people from committing crime by deterrence
through punishment, and by rehabilitation in prisons and treatment programmes.
But most rapists are not convicted, which generates impunity. The deterrent
effect of potential punishment depends on rapists being convicted in the courts.
This requires reforms of the criminal justice system so that rapists are more
usually convicted. This is not to promote a punitive state, but rather the
development of a gender-sensitive state, which responds to the concerns of
victim-survivors of rape.
Conflict zones
Rape is more common when other forms of violence are more common. Rape is
more frequent in zones of conflict than of peace. The use of rape as a weapon of
war has consequences for the long-term perpetuation of ethnic hatred and
political instability. The absence of effective sanctioning of offenders can be
significant in conflict zones, where informal interventions to sanction offenders
may also be absent. Attempts to reduce the higher rates of sexual violence in
conflict zones have included reducing the gender imbalance in decision-making
in peacekeeping forces. Improving the gender balance in decision making is
important in decisional arenas, from peace keeping to parliaments. Reducing war
and other forms of violence is important for reducing rape.
The prevention of rape requires the changing of minds so that no man wants to
rape. The public decJhanvition that rape is a crime, and hence wrong, offers
significant symbolic power, which may be further enhanced by the successful
use of criminal sanctions. But contemporary culture is ambiguous and
contradictory on the status of rape, not least in the new social media. Aspects of
61 | P a g e
pornography and the commercialisation of sex can contribute to gendered
images that can be conducive to rape. Such ‘rape culture’ can have detrimental
effects on the treatment of victims by the police, juries and others. Hence,
culture, media and
education have become additional sites of action to prevent rape.
Economy
62 | P a g e
causal pathway in the reverse direction, which appears to flow from economic
inequality to violent crime, asFajnzylber et al (1998) found in a study for The
World Bank Indeed, there are a multitude of criminological studies, largely
based in the global north, finding that economic inequality is linked to violent
crime, as in the meta-review of 63 studies by Chirico’s (1987) of 34 studies by
Hsieh and Pugh (1993),and the meta-analysis of over 200 studies by Pratt and
Cullen(2005). This is part of a wider social science literature that links violence
to other aspects of society (Wallaby, 2009, 2013; Ray,2011; Wallaby et al,
2014).Further, reductions in the amount of resourcing for services to prevent
violence against women (Towers and Wallaby, 2012) can have effects on the
level of violence. Changes in the financing of services for victim-survivors can
have an impact not only on their well-being but also on their ability to respond
through engaging in the prosecution of the rapist and in public education about
the realities of rape. These wider consequences of the funding of services for
victim-survivors can assist the prevention of further rapes.16
Gender equality
63 | P a g e
1976;Kelly, 1988; Wallaby, 2009; Brown and Walk late, 2012). This connection
operates at several levels: gendered economic and cultural inequalities increase
the vulnerability of the victim and the motivation and capacity of the rapist;
gendered inequalities indecision-making and politics reduce the likelihood of
institutions prioritising rape prevention policies; and the form of the gender
regime affects the structuring of gendered institutions and the relations between
them. The development of effective policy requires input from those who have
experienced rape and from gender experts, and it requires gender balance in the
key decision-making arenas in order to secure this. Making the relevant changes
in policies requires the mobilisation of relevant actors. This in turn also requires
gender balance in each of the relevant domains of decision-making, from the
police to peacekeepers to parliamentarians. The gender imbalance in decision-
making means that women’s experiences and interests are underrepresented
when crucial decisions are made in professional bodies, parliaments and conflict
zones. Gender inequalities in the governance and practice of culture, media and
education have implications for the likelihood that these institutions propagate
rather than contest rape myths, which affect juries making
verdicts of guilt and innocence in trials.'
Rethinking ‘prevention’
The prevention of rape requires the development of practices that disrupt the
causal pathways leading to rape. In order to prevent rape, it is thus necessary to
identify the causes of rape. One approach includes ‘prevention’ within an
ambitious attempt to identify the policy architecture needed for effective
national strategies to end violence against women, articulated in the6Ps of
‘perspective, policy, prevention, provision, protection and prosecution’ (Coy et
al, 2008; Kelly et al, 2011), which has contributed to the development of UK
national strategy and plans (HM Government, 2009, 2010, 2015). Another
approach, led from public health, distinguishes between primary,secondary and
64 | P a g e
tertiary prevention, drawing on an ‘ecological model’ (Bronfenbrenner, 1977,
1979; Heise, 1998; WHO, 2002,2014b; Loots et al, 2011; Walden and Wall,
2014). Each of these approaches to ‘prevention’ contributes important elements
to a model of causation of rape, but each has some limitations. Three revisions
of two approaches to the theorisation of prevention are proposed. First, looking
after victim-survivors helps to prevent rape.It not only helps to mitigate the
harms, but it is necessary: for the proper functioning of the legal and justice
system, that rape victims be supported to endure its processes so as to end
impunity for rapists; for the education of the public, policy-makers and
politicians, that rape victims are supported to speak out; and for the reform of the
institutions that engage with rape, that survivors confidently engage in their
reform. Services for victims are part of prevention. Second, prevention concerns
more than changes to culture, norms and attitudes. It requires reforms in all
major social institutions, not only culture, media and education; changing
attitudes is not enough. All the sites of intervention that have been identified are
relevant and important, even if of varying importance. Hence it is necessary to
have and to improve interventions in: strategic planning and decision-making;
specialised victim support; health services; law and the criminal justice system;
conflict zones; culture, media and education; and the economy. Third, the theory
of rape that underpins the strategy for prevention should draw on the concept of
‘institution’ in preference to that of ‘risk factor’, and connect the components of
the analysis using complex systems theory rather than merely statistical
correlations. It should draw on social scientific understandings of social
institutions and how these constitute the social system that is a society. The
model of prevention needs to be able to address both negative and positive
feedback loops (for example, the treatment and subsequent conduct of the
survivor).The evidence that is included should be all evidence: the field is not
yet so maturely developed, and nor is rape the type of phenomenon for which
relevant evidence can be restricted to the standards possible in medical science
(for example, random control trials and experimental methods written up in pee
review ed journals). When reviewing the knowledge base in this book, a broad
range of evidence is admitted for critical scrutiny. A more fully developed model
or theory of gender-based violence is needed. The effort put into developing an
65 | P a g e
effective approach to ‘prevention’ (Coy et al, 2008; Kelly et al, 2011;WHO,
2002, 2014b) indicates the importance of this agenda. This new approach to
theorising rape is developed during the course of the book, and is found in the
concluding chapter.
Definitions of rape
66 | P a g e
(2002) treats rape, other forms of sexual violence and violence in general, as
issues of public health. WHO Resolution WHA49.25 in 1996 ‘declares that
violence is a leading worldwide public health problem.’ Rape is defined as:
‘Physically forced or otherwise coerced penetration – even if slight – of the
vulva or anus, using a penis, other body parts Oran object’ (WHO, 2002, p
149).The legal definition of rape varies slightly between legal regimes. At its
core, rape is coerced violation or penetration of the body. The nature of the
coercion is variously understood as the absence of consent, the use of force, the
threat of use of force, or a wider context of generalised coercion. There are
variations in whether the penetration can be with any object or is restricted to the
penis; whether the part of the body penetrated can include the mouth or anus, or
is restricted to the vagina. In legal terms, variations in the object and orifice
determine whether rape is only ever an offence by a man against a woman, or if
men can also be victims, or women can also be perpetrators. Legal developments
are discussed in more detail in the review of law below. The popular definition
of rape is often more restricted than the legal definition. Not only the general
public, but also even survivors of actions that are legally rape are reluctant to use
the term ‘rape’ unless the circumstances are more extreme than thelaw requires
(Wallaby and Mayhill, 2001). This is probably relatedto the stigmatisation of
rape victims in popular culture (Southland Wallaby, 1991). This discrepancy
between popular and legal definitions of rape has consequences for the treatment
of victims of rape and for the conviction of rapists by courts that use juries.
Social scientific research has investigated the range of meanings attached to the
term ‘rape’, and explored the implications of the different ways in which rape is
defined in both law and popular culture. The findings from this research mean
that some recent surveys offer behavioural descriptions rather than the summary
term ‘rape’ to respondents, gaining better understanding of the meaning of the
act to the survivor (Wallaby and Allen, 2004;Fisher, 2009). Further research has
developed the concept of ‘continuum of sexual violence’ so as to capture the
way in which small events are connected to create a context that is more
threatening than the sum of its parts (Kelly, 1988).The terms ‘victim’ and
‘survivor’ are used interchangeably in this book, although there are different
connotations attached to them. The use of the more conventional term, ‘victim’,
67 | P a g e
has-been subject to the criticism that it denies agency to the raped woman, and
hence that the term ‘survivor’ should be used instead to take account of her
actions (Kelly, 1988). However, it is also argued that to attribute agency to the
person who has-been raped is misleading since it might imply that actions bythis
person could have made a difference, and is thus consistent with victim blaming.
This study follows the practice that has developed in the field of using both
terms, ‘victim-survivor’, but when this is overly complex, the term ‘victim’ is
used, while cognisant of its limitations. ‘Forced marriage’ might be considered
to include rape, since the sex is without consent because the marriage was
‘forced’. However, since the coercion into the marriage may be from the family
and kin of the woman, rather than from the man she marries, it is not clear that
the man, who did not coerce the marriage, is, in law, a rapist. A similar issue
arises in the case of trafficking of women for purposes of sexual exploitation,
where the sex is without consent since the victim was trafficked, but where the
man may be unaware that this is the case and believes the woman to have
consented. It is not clear that the man who buys the (coerced) sex is, in law, a
rapist. In law, the rapist is person who knows that he is coercing the woman as
he rapes her, but in the cases of forced marriage and trafficking, the coercionist
being done by someone other than the person engaging in the sex. Hence, while
the man doing the sex in both of these cases is not usually considered in law to
be a rapist, from the woman’s point of view this is nevertheless sex without
consent, because of the coercive context created by others.
68 | P a g e
services and their coordination so that the victim-survivor receives the best
support. SACT (Sexual AssaultCrisis Team) practice is an example of best
practice in the provision of these services. SACT is a rape crisis shelter
intervention in the US that provides residential-based support for victim-
survivors of rape, sexual assault and sex trafficking, including those in the
immediate aftermath of a rape; those coming to terms with historic rape
experiences, including as a child; and those who have returned to the area to
testify at trial. SACT has been identified as an example of best practice by a
2011 resource sharing project for the National Sexual Assault Coalition (see
www.nsvrc.org/organizations/84).The shelter was established in 2002, and
serves around 20-30 victim survivors in its shelter overnight. Unlike many
domestic violence shelters, all residential accommodation is in solo rooms to
accommodate the specific need for privacy of many rape victim-survivors. The
shelter works with both female and male victims of rape and sexual violence. Its
designed to have two completely separate sides, allowing female and male
victim-survivors’ privacy. Clients are also less likely to have young children
with them compared with those staying in domestic violence shelters.
Importantly, the board that oversees SACT is made up of people from the
communities it serves. The average stay in the shelter is three to five days,
although individuals who are looking for new housing options or who have other
needs might stay longer. There is no limit to the time SACT permits a survivor
to stay; as long as they are working towards their goals, they can keep their
residential place (Bein and Hurt, 2011).As well as residential accommodation,
SACT provides a 24-hour sexual assault hotline answered by trained advocates,
and a range of advocacy services for both residential and non-residential clients,
including hospital advocacy, legal advocacy, attorney consultation through a
specialist law project, education, training and support programmes, information
and training on date rape, stranger rape, surviving incest, inner child workshops,
ritualised or sadistic abuse, different types of harassment, support groups, for
profit, worship, or group/gang-related sexual violence and criminal activity, and
school and community safety programmes. SACT is now certified to provide
bystander training and offers an onsite campus office at the local military
academy, adding prevention programming to all aspects of the SACT
69 | P a g e
programme (SACT, 2013). SACT is a non-profit organisation staffed by
personnel with over 40 hours of initial training in sexual violence, and ongoing
training in supporting victim-survivors of rape and sexual assault. Recipients are
female victim survivors of rape and sexual assault and male victim-survivors of
rape and sexual and domestic assault. As well as serving the local community,
referrals to SACT have also come from across the country, including California,
Connecticut, New York and Boston. The goal of SACT is to provide
comprehensive services to victim-survivors of sexual violence, including
emergency shelter and transitional housing for female victims of sexual violence
and male victim-survivors of sexual or domestic violence, legal and medical
advocacy, crisis services, support groups and educational forums. To address the
problem of sexual violence in the community, these services are designed to
meet the needs of both female and male victim-survivors, and services are also
available to victim-survivors’ non-offending family members and support
networks(SACT, 2013). SACT’s vision is that ‘the shelter serves every non-
offending human being’ (2013). SACT is designed to provide immediate support
to victim-survivors of rape, including accessing health and legal services; tore-
build victim-survivors’ self-esteem and self-confidence; and to come to terms
with what has happened to them no matter when the rape occurred (that is,
SACT works with victim-survivors in the immediate aftermath of a rape and
with those who were raped longer ago, including those adults who experienced
rape or sexual abuse as children). In addition, SACT provides training around
prevention, dating violence and healthy relationships to help prevent re-
victimisation in the future by enabling victim-survivors, non-offending family
members, high schools and colleges, the community at large, and other
professionals to better understand the nature of sexual violence, and to develop
access to independent living through education and training. Prior to the opening
of the shelter, SACT was already providing outreach services, but was having
difficulty finding appropriate shelter for victim survivors of rape. While the local
domestic violence shelter would certainly take in female sexual assault victim-
survivors, the shelter’s massive workload prevented the development of specific
services tosupport rape and sexual assault victim-survivors in their recovery.
SACT already had this expertise from running the 24-hour hotline and outreach
70 | P a g e
services for victim-survivors of rape, and therefore the shelter was conceived of
to fill an identified need using the knowledge and skills already available in the
local rape and domestic and sexual assault support community (Bein and Hurt,
2011).In keeping with its vision (to serve every non-offending human
being),SACT provides residential services to male victims of rape, sexual and
domestic violence, as well as female victims of rape and sexual violence. This
enables SACT to address a gap in local provision because the local domestic
violence shelter was not able to house men, so male clients were being housed in
hotel rooms that did not enable a good model of support and recovery to be
delivered, and created additional concerns around client safety and client-
advocate meetings (Bein and Hurt, 2011).The shelter ensures issues of privacy
and personal safety are taken very seriously. For example, they recognised that
the shelter would need to offer bathrooms and showers that individuals could use
privately, and that shelter residents would need to be able to lock their doors and
be alone whenever they chose. All bedrooms are designed for solo occupation,
unless there is a non-offending partner whom the survivor chooses to accompany
them. While many of these requirements are similar to those for domestic
violence victim-survivors, other ‘rules ‘that work well in these types of shelters
need to be adapted to support victim-survivors of rape. SACT also houses family
members of victim survivors who have come to town to provide support in the
immediate aftermath of a rape, as well as victim-survivors who are returning to
town to deal with legal processes and trials. SACT works collaboratively with
organisations across the country, which enables it to meet the needs of diverse
range of recipients. For example, through collaborative work with the state-wide
Vermont Pride Center, SACT provides specialised services to the lesbian, gay,
bisexual, trans or questioning (LGBTQ) community, especially the transgender
community and bias/hate crime victims. Their needs for safe housing and shelter
are for longer periods of time as the violence often occurs in the home or they
are already on the streets and cannot return to their home of origin. They must
re-establish their lives in a different location. SACT also works in collaboration
with the local children’s advocacy centre, for child victims and non-offending
parents or guardians, and receives referrals from mental health agencies,
therapists, other community programmes such as the Council on Aging, as well
71 | P a g e
as other shelters and network programmes when they have reached capacity.
SACT also provides shelter and services for victim-survivors and the
professionals who are involved in the work of stopping human sex trafficking,
including law enforcement, attorneys and both state and federal professionals.
2. Data. Have data to assess if the plan is working – surveys to measure the
extent of rape and sexual assault in society; administrative statistics to assess if
each policy body is achieving their planned contribution; and research to
investigate newinterventions.
5. Criminal justice. Reduce the attrition of cases as they proceed through the
criminal justice system, from a police report to conviction, and reduce secondary
victimisation.
72 | P a g e
7. Culture, media and education. Challenge the new and old media to reduce the
propagation of rape myths and rape culture.
8. Economy. Ensure all victims have access to income to mitigate the effects of
rape – reduce gendered economic inequalities to reduce vulnerability.
10. Reduce violence. Prioritise policy options that reduce violence, so as to cease
feeding violence with violence.17
Conclusions
Hence we conclude that theories of the causation of rape need to deepen in
sophistication in order to better establish the foundations for policy based on
‘what works’. It is necessary to go beyond the simple models of rape that
identify only the ‘risk factors’ that affect the vulnerability of victims to rape and
the propensity of men to rape. It is important to build a complex systems model
that includes each of the institutions that currently contributes to rape, and that
could potentially be part of prevention. Each of the relevant institutions has an
effect not only on individuals, but also on the other institutions relevant to rape.
The effects of institutions on institutions are important – they should not be
neglected, as is often the case in the ‘risk factor’ model. One implication is that
better provision for victim-survivors of rape can prevent rape, in addition to
mitigating its harms. Better provision of services has been focused on mitigating
the harms of rape on the victim-survivor. But it has wider effects. Abetter
supported victim-survivor is more able to effect change son relevant institutions.
Stronger victim-survivors are better able to endure the criminal justice system,
thereby leading to higher conviction rates; to speak out and educate the public
and policy-makers on the reality of rape, thereby challenging rape myths; and
17
Tewksbury, R., Jennings, W.G. and Zgoba, K. (2012) ‘A longitudinal examination of sex offender recidivism prior
to and following the implementation of SORN’, Behavioral Sciences and the Law, vol 30, no 3, pp 308-28.
73 | P a g e
thus to contribute to rape prevention. The institutions relevant to the causation
and prevention of rape are themselves shaped by wider societal forms, including
the gender regime and the system of violence. Gender regimes vary in gendered
economic inequalities, gendered imbalances in decision-making, gendered
participation in civil society, and gendered violence. Variations in gender
inequality shape the institutions of the system of rape: reducing gendered
inequalities reduces rape. Societies vary in the extent to which they are violent:
institutions generating violence cluster so that if there is more of one form of
violence, there are more of the other forms of violence. Reducing violence
overall reduces rape. The production and prevention of rape can be understood
to occur at three levels of analysis: societal-level systems (gender regimes,
overall violence); social institutions (planning/political, health, law and criminal
justice, conflict/military, civil society, economy); and individual victims and
rapists.18
2. Definitions.—
In this Act. unless the context otherwise requires—(a) “brothel“ includes any
house, room, conveyance or place, or any portion of any house, room,
conveyance or place, which is used for purposes of sexual exploitation or abuse
for the gain of another person or for the mutual gain of two or more prostitutes;
(aa) “child“ means a person who has not completed the age of sixteen years;
(b) “corrective institution“ means an institution, by whatever name called (being
an institution established or licensed as such under Section 21), in which
persons, who are in need of correction, may be detained under this Act, and
includes a shelter where under trials may be kept in pursuance of this Act;
(c) “magistrate“ means a Magistrate specified in the second column of the
Schedule as being competent to exercise the powers conferred by the section in
18
Tewksbury, R., Jennings, W.G. and Zgoba, K. (2012) ‘A longitudinal examination of sex offender recidivism prior
to and following the implementation of SORN’, Behavioral Sciences and the Law, vol 30, no 3, pp 308-28.
74 | P a g e
which the expression occurs and which is specified in the first column of the
Schedule;
(ca) “major“ means a person who has completed the age of eighteen years;19
(cb) “minor“ means a person who has completed the age of sixteen years but has
not completed the age of eighteen years;
(d) “prescribed“ means prescribed by rules made under this Act;
(e) [1] [ * * * * * * ].
(f) “prostitution“ means the sexual exploitation or abuse of persons for
commercial purposes, and the expression “prostitute” shall be construed
accordingly;
(g) “protective home“ means an institution, by whatever name called being an
institution established or licensed as such under Section 21), in which persons
who are in need of care and protection, may be kept under this Act and where
appropriate technically qualified persons, equipment’s and other facilities have
been provided but does not include,—
(i) a shelter where under trials may be kept in pursuance of this Act, or
(ii) a corrective institution;
(h) “public place“ means any place intended for use by, or accessible to, the
public and includes any public conveyance;
(i) “special police officer” means a police officer appointed by or on behalf of
the State government to be in charge of police duties within a specified area for
the purpose of this Act;
(j) “trafficking police officer“ means a police officer appointed by the Central
Government under sub-section (4) of Section 13.
Comments
(b) being the owner, lessor or landlord of any premises or the agent of such
owner, lessor or landlord, lets the same or any part thereof with the knowledge
that the same or any part thereof is intended to be used as a brothel, or is wilfully
a party to the use of such premises or any part thereof as a brothel, shall be
punishable on first conviction with imprisonment for a term which may extend
to two years and with fine which fine which may extend to two thousand rupees
and in the event of a second or subsequent conviction, with rigorous
imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years and also with fine.
(2-A) For the purposes of sub-section (2), it shall be presumed, until the contrary
is proved, that any person referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) of that sub-
section, is knowingly allowing the premises or any part thereof to be used as a
76 | P a g e
brothel or, as the case may be, has knowledge that the premises or any part
thereof are being used as a brothel, if,—
(b) a copy of the list of all things found during the search referred to in clause (a)
is given to such person.
(3) Notwithstanding any thing contained in any other law for the time being in
force, on conviction of any person referred to in clause (a) or clause (d) of sub-
section (2) of any offence under that sub-section in respect of any premises or
any part thereof, any lease or agreement under which such premises have been
leased out or held or occupied at the time of the commission of the offence, shall
become void and inoperative with effect from the date of the said conviction.
4. Punishment for living on the earnings of prostitution .—(1) Any person over
the age of eighteen years who knowingly lives, wholly or in part, on the earnings
of the prostitution of any other person shall be punishable with imprisonment for
a term which may extend to two years, or with fine which may extend to one
thousand rupees, or with both, and where such earnings relate to the prostitution
of a child or a minor, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term of not
less than seven years and not more than ten years.
(2) Where any person over the age of eighteen years is proved,—
77 | P a g e
(c) to be acting as a tout or pimp on behalf of a prostitute, it shall be presumed,
until the contrary is proved, that such person is knowingly living on the earnings
of prostitution of another person within the meaning of sub-section (1).
(b) in the place to which she may have gone as a result of the inducement or to
which he/she is taken or caused to be taken or an attempt to take him/her is
made.
Provided that the court may for adequate and special reasons to be mentioned in
the judgment, impose a sentence of imprisonment for a term which may be less
than seven years.
(2) Where any person is found with a child in a brothel, it shall be presumed,
unless the contrary is proved, that he has committed an offence under sub-
section (1).
(4) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, no suit, prosecution or other legal
proceeding shall lie against such woman or girl at the instance of the person by
whom she has been detained, for the recovery of any jewellery, wearing apparel
or other property alleged to have been lent or supplied to or for such woman or
girl or to have been pledged by such woman or girl or for the recovery of any
money alleged to be payable by such woman or girl.
Provided that the Court may, for adequate and special reasons to be mentioned
in the judgment, impose a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than seven
years.
shall be punishable on first conviction with imprisonment for a term which may
extend to three months, or with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees, or
with both, and in the event of a second or subsequent conviction with
imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months and also with fine,
which may extend to two hundred rupees, and if the public place or premises
happen to be a hotel, the license for carrying on the business of such hotel under
any law for the time being in force shall also be liable to be suspended for a
period of not less than three months but which may extend to one year:
18. Closure of brothel and eviction of offenders from the premises .—(1) A
Magistrate may, on receipt of information from the police or otherwise, that any
house, room, place or any portion thereof within a distance of two hundred
metres of any public place referred to in sub-section (1)of Section 7 is being run
or used as a brothel by any person, or is being used by prostitutes for carrying on
their trade, issue notice on the owner, lessor or landlord or such house, room,
place or portion or the agent of the owner, lessor or landlord or on the tenant,
lessee, occupier of, or any other person in charge of such house, room, place, or
81 | P a g e
portion, to show cause within seven days of the receipt of the notice why the
same should not be attached for improper use there of,and if, after hearing the
person concerned, the Magistrate is satisfied that the house, room, place or
portion is being used as a brothel or for carrying on prostitution, then the
Magistrate may pass orders,—
(a) directing eviction of the occupier within seven days of the passing of the
order from the house, room, place, or portion;
(b) directing that before letting it out during the period of one year or in a case
where a child or minor has been found in such house, room, place or portion
during a search under Section 15,during the period of three years, immediately
after the passing of the order, the owner, lessor or landlord or the agent of the
owner, lessor or landlord shall obtain the previous approval of the Magistrate;
20
Immoral traffic prevention Act, 1956(https://legislative.gov.in)
The Indecent Representation of Women Prohibition, Act 1986 (https://legislative.gov.in)
21
The Indecent Representation of Women Prohibition, Act 1986 (https://legislative.gov.in)
82 | P a g e
An Act to prohibit indecent representation of women through advertisements or
in publications, writings, paintings, figures or in any other manner and for
matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
83 | P a g e
(i) the publication of which is proved to be justified as being for the public good
on the ground that such book, pamphlet, paper, slide, film, writing, drawing,
painting, photograph, representation or figure is in the interest of science,
literature, art, or learning or other objects of general concern; or
(ii) which is kept or used bona fide for religious purposes;
22
The Indecent Representation of Women Prohibition, Act 1986 (https://legislative.gov.in)
85 | P a g e
the company, such director, manager, secretary or other officer shall be
proceeded against and punished accordingly.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section,— (a) “company” means any
body corporate and includes a firm or other association of individuals; and
(b) “director”, in relation to a firm, means a partner in the firm.
24
Indian penal code. 1860 (https://legislative.gov.in),
. Subs. by Act 4 of 1898, s. 2, for section 4.
10. Subs. by the A.O. 1950, for cls. (1) to (4).
11. Ins. by Act 10 of 2009, s. 51 (w.e.f. 27-10-2009).
12. Subs. by s. 51, ibid., for the Explanation (w.e.f. 27-10-2009
90 | P a g e
Preamble.—WHEREAS it is expedient to provide a general Penal Code for
2[India]; It is enacted as follows:—
1. Title and extent of operation of the Code.—This Act shall be called the
Indian Penal Code, and shall 3[extend to the whole of India 4[except the State of
Jammu and Kashmir]].
2. Punishment of offences committed within India.—Every person shall be
liable to punishment under this Code and not otherwise for every act or omission
contrary to the provisions thereof, of which he shall be guilty within 5[India]
6****.
3. Punishment of offences committed beyond, but which by law may be
tried within, India.—
Any person liable, by any 7[Indian law], to be tried for an offence committed
beyond 8[India] shall be dealt with according to the provisions of this Code for
any act committed beyond 8[India] in the same manner as if such act had been
committed within 5[India].
9[4. Extension of Code to extra-territorial offences.—The provisions of this
Code apply also to any offence committed by—
10[(1) any citizen of India in any place without and beyond India;
91 | P a g e
(2) any person on any ship or aircraft registered in India wherever it may be.]
11[(3) any person in any place without and beyond India committing offence
targeting a computer resource located in India.]25
12[Explanation.—In this section—(a) the word “offence” includes every act
committed outside India which, if committed in India, would be punishable
under this Code; (b) the expression “computer resource” shall have the meaning
assigned to it in clause (k) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Information
Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000);]
1[Illustration]
2***A, 3[who is 4[a citizen of India]], commits a murder in Uganda. He can be
tried and convicted of murder in any place in 5[India] in which he may be
found.
25
Indian penal code. 1860 (https://legislative.gov.in),
1. The Indian Penal Code has been extended to Berar by the Berar Laws Act, 1941 (4 of 1941) and has been
declared in force
in—
Sonthal Parganas, by the Sonthal Parganas Settlement Regulation 1872 (3 of 1872) s. 2;
Panth Piploda, by the Panth Piploda Laws Regulation, 1929 (1 of 1929), s. 2 and the Sch.;
Khondmals District, by the Khondmals Laws Regulation, 1936 (4 of 1936), s. 3 and the Sch; and
Angul District, by the Angul Laws Regulation, 1936 (5 of 1936), s. 3 and the Sch.
It has been declared under s. 3 (a) of the Scheduled Districts Act, 1874 (14 of 1874), to be in force in the following
Scheduled Districts, namely: the United Provinces Tarai Districts, see Gazette of India, 1876, Pt. I, p. 505; the
Districts of
Hazaribagh, Lohardaga [now called the Ranchi District, see Calcutta Gazetta, 1899, Pt. I, p. 44] and Manbhum and
Pargana Dhalbhum and the Kolhan in the District of Singhbum—see Gazette of India, 1881, Pt. I, p. 504.
It has been extended under s. 5 of the same Act to the Lushai Hills—see Gazette of India, 1898, Pt. II, p. 345.
The Act has been extended to Goa, Daman and Diu by Reg. 12 of 1962, s. 3 and Sch; to Dadra and Nagar Haveli
by Reg. 6
of 1963, s. 2 and Sch. I.; to Pondicherry by Reg. 7 of 1963, s. 3 and Sch. I and to Lakshadweep by Reg. 8 of 1965,
s. 3 and Sch.
2. The words “British India” have successively been subs. by the A.O. 1948, the A.O. 1950 and Act 3 of 1951, s. 3
and the Sch.,
to read as above.
3. The Original words have successively been amended by Act 12 of 1891, s. 2 and Sch. I, the A.O. 1937, the A.O.
1948 and the A.O. 1950 to read as above.
Https://devgan.in/ipc/section/354
4. Subs. by Act 3 of 1951, s. 3 and the Sch., for “except Part B States”.
5. The original words “the said territories” have successively been amended by the A.O. 1937, the A.O. 1948, the
A.O 1950 and
Act 3 of 1951, s. 3 and the Sch., to read as above.
92 | P a g e
Basically assault on women is defined under Section 354 to 354 D of the
Indian Penal Code, 1680. And hence let us go through those sections of
Indian Penal code, 1860.
SECTION 354
Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty.—
Whoever Assaults or uses criminal force to any woman, intending to outrage or
knowing it to be likely that he will there by outrage her modesty, 1[shall be
punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be
less than one year but which may extend to five years, and shall also be liable to
fine].
26
27
Https://devgan.in/ipc/section/354
4. Subs. by Act 3 of 1951, s. 3 and the Sch., for “except Part B States”.
5. The original words “the said territories” have successively been amended by the A.O. 1937, the A.O. 1948, the
A.O 1950 and
Act 3 of 1951, s. 3 and the Sch., to read as above.
6. The words and figures “on or after the said first day of May, 1861” rep. by Act 12 of 1891, s. 2 and the First Sch.
7. Subs. by the A.O. 1937, for “law passed by the Governor General of India in Council”.
93 | P a g e
(2) Any man who commits the offence specified in clause (i) or clause (ii) or
clause (iii) of sub-section (1) shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a
term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
(3) Any man who commits the offence specified in clause (iv) of sub-section (1)
shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may
extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.
SECTION 354 B
Assault or use of criminal force to woman with intent to disrobe.—Any man
who assaults or uses criminal force to any woman or abets such act with the
intention of disrobing or compelling her to be naked, shall be punished with
imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than three
years but which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
94 | P a g e
Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person, intending thereby to
dishonour that person, otherwise than on grave and sudden provocation given by
that person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term
which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
Hence Any man who assaults or makes the use of criminal force on any woman
or abets such act with the intention of disrobing or compelling her to be naked,
shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which shall
not be less than three years but which may extend to seven years, and shall also
be liable to fine.
SECTION 354 C
VOYEURISM
Any man who watches, or captures the image of a woman engaging in a private
act in circumstances where she would usually have the expectation of not being
observed either by the perpetrator or by any other person at the behest of the
perpetrator or disseminates such image shall be punished on first conviction with
imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than one
year, but which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine, and be
punished on a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment of either
28
Https://devgan.in/ipc/section/354
4. Subs. by Act 3 of 1951, s. 3 and the Sch., for “except Part B States”.
5. The original words “the said territories” have successively been amended by the A.O. 1937, the A.O. 1948, the
A.O 1950 and
Act 3 of 1951, s. 3 and the Sch., to read as above.
6. The words and figures “on or after the said first day of May, 1861” rep. by Act 12 of 1891, s. 2 and the First Sch.
7. Subs. by the A.O. 1937, for “law passed by the Governor General of India in Council”.
95 | P a g e
description for a term which shall not be less than three years, but which may
extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Explanation 1.—For the purpose of this section, “private act” includes an act of
watching carried out in a place which, in the circumstances, would reasonably be
expected to provide privacy and where the victim's genitals, posterior or breasts
are exposed or covered only in underwear; or the victim is using a lavatory; or
the victim is doing a sexual act that is not of a kind ordinarily done in public.
Explanation 2.—Where the victim consents to the capture of the images or any
act, but not to their dissemination to third persons and where such image or act is
disseminated, such dissemination shall be considered an offence under this
section.
29
SECTION 354 D
STALKING
Stalking.—(1) Any man who—
(i) follows a woman and contacts, or attempts to contact such woman to foster
personal interaction repeatedly despite a clear indication of disinterest by such
woman; or (ii) monitors the use by a woman of the internet, email or any other
form of electronic communication, commits the offence of stalking:
Provided that such conduct shall not amount to stalking if the man who pursued
it proves that—
29
Https://devgan.in/ipc/section/354
4. Subs. by Act 3 of 1951, s. 3 and the Sch., for “except Part B States”.
5. The original words “the said territories” have successively been amended by the A.O. 1937, the A.O. 1948, the
A.O 1950 and
96 | P a g e
(i) it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime and the man
accused of stalking had been entrusted with the responsibility of prevention and
detection of crime by the State; or (ii) it was pursued under any law or to comply
with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any law; or (iii)
in the particular circumstances such conduct was reasonable and justified (2)
Whoever commits the offence of stalking shall be punished on first conviction
with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three
years, and shall also be liable to fine; and be punished on a second or subsequent
conviction, with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend
to five years, and shall also be liable to fine.
30
CHAPTER SIX
CASE STUDY
97 | P a g e
There is a constant demand for a change in the terminology from ‘rape victim’
to ‘rape survivor’ in the agenda of feminist concerns in discourses related to
rape. But beyond the feminist investment on surviving rape, a systematic reading
of public discourses presents the traumatic sustenance of layers of violence that
follows rape. The Suryanelli girl has survived rape, but the violent experience of
life after rape perpetrated by systemic structures of patriarchy places her at the
receiving end of a system that consciously alienates, humiliates and hunts her
down.
While referring to the Suryanelli rape case there are two kinds of discourses
circulated widely. One is the question of legality of the crime involved, with a
heavily prejudiced and unsympathetic legal frame work attempting to frame the
girl as an eternal victim subject for whom justice is almost impossible, mediated
through parallel machinery of the state, including law enforcement. The
impossibility of justice is not the intention of the legal machinery but it comes
through the operating forces of judgments, prosecution stands, law enforcing
offices like police stations and officers, and questions of evidence, alibis and so
on.
The second discourse is the moral discourse heavily prejudiced and antagonistic
to the survivor that happily relates the story of the fallen girl, punished for her
deviance thus providing a lesson to all women in the society. This discourse is
circulated through the specificities of the rape case but intentionally expecting to
form a larger field of reprimands, guidelines, moral lessons for any woman who
violates the unwritten codes of conduct. In both the discourses the survivor and
the harrowing experiences that she went through lie somewhere far off from the
domain of address, which rises from definitive intention to control and exploit
female sexuality. Alternatively this moral realm affects and manipulates the
operations of the legal discourse as clearly evident from the high court judgment
releasing all the accused from the Suryanelli case.
98 | P a g e
The Suryanelli rape, occurred in 1996 in Kerala, involves the abduction, severe
exploitation and rape of a sixteen year old school girl, abducted and taken to
different places in Kerala, by 42 men from all walks of life. Between January 16
and February 26 she was submitted to extreme and horrible forms of sexual
violence. The survivor named many high profiled politicians and professionals
including Congress leader and the present Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairperson PJ
Kurien as part of her assaulters, but they did not figure in the charge sheet given
the consideration of lack of evidence. Nair Service Society office bearer
Sukumaran Nair came up with a statement to support P J Kurien to say that
Kurien had met him at the office during the particular time of the day mentioned
by the girl. In 2000 September the special court for sexual assault convicted 35
of the accused for rigorous imprisonment and punishment. But in 2005, on the
basis of the appeal filed against this judgment the High Court of Kerala acquitted
all the convicted and punished just one, the third accused, that too reducing his
sentence to five years. The public which had already ostracized her got the right
weapon then to high light its moral judgment on the girl. The innuendos
promoted by many mainstream Malayalam dailies got affirmation through the
verdict.
In 2012 the girl was arrested for an alleged financial irregularity case in the
office where she was working. The lawyers of the girl say that vested interest
had set her up as her case was coming up in the Supreme Court. The recent
development in the issue is the Supreme Court’s directions to the High court to
re- examine the case, finding the High court judgment legally flawed. It should
be noted that this is based on an appeal filed by the Kerala Government against
the High court judgment, which remained pending for about seven years.
Another development in the case is the capture of the only convicted accused of
Suryanelli Case who had jumped bail earlier, making a statement that the deputy
chairman of Rajya Sabha , P.J Kurien was involved in the case and he personally
had taken Kurien to the Guest house referred to by the girl. In the light of this
statement there has been wide spread demands to re-open the case to include
Kurien in the list of the accused.
Justice delayed:
99 | P a g e
Now the delay in the legal proceedings that adds to the intense suffering and
communal ostracising of the girl for 17 years has never been addressed. The
way, the case has been handled/mis handled by the law enforcing officers, the
survivor was taken from place to place as part of the enquiry and medical
examination and some of the Malayalam dailies made titillating stories out of a
sixteen year old who was brutally raped by 42 men, all add to the legal injustice
done to her. Being a constant spectacle for the demands of a sex-starved society,
the print media that covered her case through convoluted stories celebrated her
as a piece of spicy ingredient.
That seventeen years have passed and still the crime committed to a sixteen year
old has been denied justice shows the inadequacy of the legal mechanism in the
country. It is to be noted that the rampant criticism extended by the feminist
organizations regarding the delay in sexual assault cases in the light of the Delhi
rape has resulted a speedy dealing of the Suryanelli appeal. Now the delay in
justice has resulted in many things: the sixteen year old girl has lived seventeen
years through the humiliation of a rigid moral society, the girl has been
constantly chased and hunted down by a group of accused in a defensive mode,
the entire family goes through the social stigma towards the rape survivor…the
story goes on. While considering the case will all these be concerns for law?
100 | P a g e
girl’s statement at this point. April 3, 1996 issue of the daily carried a front page
cartoon, titled Agniputri representing a girl with the list of UDF candidates and
someone from the background addressing her as comrade, prompting her to
pause and wail after reading out each name from the list. This was the most
naturalized form of misogyny that Kerala society received without any protest.
While attempting to protect P.J Kurien and those close to the Catholic
Church, Manorama violated all decencies of journalist etiquette and human
concerns”.
32
https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/kochi/2014/feb/15/Many-Victims-in-Sex-Scams-Awaiting-Justice-575992.html
Cortesy Indian Express
102 | P a g e
33
The Suryanelli case is also a typical example of a rape case fought for many
years (about seventeen years) and still reached nowhere. As in the case of
Mathura and other infamous judgments from apex courts, the Suryanelli
judgment also evokes questions on the irresponsible and insensitive functioning
of the criminal judicial system. The judgment that strives hard to prove that the
girl’s statements are false, relating to a previous experience of her lying about
the hostel fee of four hundred and fifty rupees and misusing it and also an
attempt on her part to pawn her ornament. These are the basic premise on which
the girl’s statements have been verified. The judgment reads while debating the
difference between rape and consensual sex:“When we read the evidence of
PW3, we have to be cognizant of her psyche- her mental makeup. Her past
conduct and behavior have to be borne in mind. She was only a student of 9th
standard. She had squandered Rs. 450/- entrusted to her by her father for
remitting hostel fees……That piece of conduct is admitted by her… a school girl
will always be obliged to account when hostel fee is not remitted. She was
prepared to take that risk. Added to this is, as suggested by the counsel for the
33
https://www.deccanchronicle.com/opinion/op-ed/260217/suryanelli-rape-case-time-cant-end-this-ostracisation.html
Article by Sherin B.S.
103 | P a g e
appellants that she was even courageous enough to approach a jeweler for
pledging an ornament of hers which her parents had given her to wear, meaning
thereby that she had much capability of courage of even withstanding a question
by her parents as to the loss of such ornament. She admitted during the evidence
that she had done so. So this gives indications about the conduct and mental
makeup of PW3. … She was not a normal innocent girl of that age. She was a
different person. The peculiarity in her personality must realistically be borne in
mind. The evidence of a person of her age with such a conduct certainly has to
be viewed seriously and with caution. A court cannot meekly swallow her
version. It requires serious critical assessment.” (pp. 42-43)
The very idea that the crucial question of whether the sexual acts of violence on
a ninth standard student by 42 men in a period of 40 days have been consensual
or not is arrived at on the basis of these two past instances shows the non-
empathetic and inhuman impulses behind the judgment leading to the contention
that the prosecution failed in proving the absence of consent. Rather the
judgment further claims that the unwillingness spoken by the girl now before the
court is an excuse found by her to save her face in the family and among the
relatives for her long absence of forty days from her house. During the 40 days
of sexual assault the Bench finds several instances for the girl to escape her
assaulters, in the bus stand, at the doctor’s place, lodges etc. The consideration
extended to the accused related to corroborative evidences or circumstances are
denied to the girl, where her age, intimidated psyche, physical and mental agony
of violence she was undergoing were not enough reasons for the Bench to decide
that the ninth standard girl could not plan an escape. With a clean conscience the
judgment rules out possibilities of adopting the normal approach for appreciating
the evidence of a rape victim.
104 | P a g e
34
34
https://www.deccanchronicle.com/opinion/op-ed/260217/suryanelli-rape-case-time-cant-end-this-ostracisation.html,
Article by Sherin B.S.
105 | P a g e
This is an easy washing off and shrugging away one’s responsibilities. The
constant urge to prove her evidences false overthrows and challenges this claim
to neutral justice. The non accountability of law to the female citizens and the
misogynist sentiments of arbitrators reflect in Suryanelli case as well. The recent
remarks of Justice Basant on the girl’s character reveal the prejudices underlying
the judgment.35
The ways in which Suryanelli case recurs in Kerala’s public sphere reveals the
aberrations in Kerala’s notion of modernity. While making a ponderous claim to
cultural elitism and modern consciousness related to its literacy rates, living
standards, health care and above all the pervasiveness of electoral politics and
thinking in the public sphere, the misogyny witnessed in this state is quite
ironical. Permeating all walks of life there lie misogyny and moral policing that
more or less affects all forms of political thinking in the state. No other Indian
state can parallel Kerala in misogyny regarding the way feminists and women’s
movements have been referred to in Kerala, female political party leaders have
been tarnished, and work places and other public places have alienated women.
35
https://www.deccanchronicle.com/opinion/op-ed/260217/suryanelli-rape-case-time-cant-end-this-ostracisation.html
Article by Sherin B.S.
106 | P a g e
there be a provision to address the irreparable damage in terms of mental,
physical and emotional harassment that has been done to a rape survivor and her
family for the past seventeen years? Who would choose this plight if this is
what it means to survive rape?
CHAPTER SEVEN
DISCUSSION
The purpose of this study is to obtain in-depth interviews and ferret out central
themes of how outside factors affected the victim herself, how these aspects
influenced her perception of herself, and which factors she believes had the most
significant impact on her re-victimization or non-re-victimization. The present
study suggests that the overall attitudes and behaviors of a sexual assault victim
determines whether she views herself as a victim or survivor which significantly
impacts the likelihood of her re-victimization. Previous research demonstrates
that various characteristics associated with a woman viewing herself as a victim
predispose her to re-victimization; whereas the characteristics associated with a
woman viewing herself as a survivor insulate her from re-victimization.
The findings of the interviews with the 20 women are consistent with the
findings in the research discussed in the literature review section and shed an
important light on the two research questions which are directly related to the
relationship between re-victimization and victim/survivor status. 1) Is a woman
with a survivor mentality of her sexual assault protected from re-victimization?
2) Is a woman with a victim mentality of her sexual assault vulnerable to re-
victimization?
The first research question is related to the survivor mentality and if it protects
the woman from being re-victimized. The results of this research suggest that a
survivor mentality does protect the woman from re-victimization. A woman with
107 | P a g e
a survivor mentality takes control of the circumstances of her life, creates a
meaning out of her experiences, participates in her own healing, has hope, and is
equipped with choice. None of the women who had a survivor mentality were
re-victimized. All 17 of the women with a survivor mentality (including those
who transformed from a victim mentality) were not re-victimized. Sixteen
women had a victim mentality and were re-victimized; however, the majority of
women developed survivor thoughts and were not re-victimized after they
embraced a survivor mentality. Even though a woman may have had a victim
mentality and was re-victimized, the study showed that a change in the thought
process is possible after the re-victimization. A woman was often able to
embrace a survivor mentality and was then not re-victimized after that change in
mentality. The second research question is related to the victim mentality and if
it makes the woman become vulnerable to re-victimization. The results of this
research suggest that a victim mentality does make a woman more vulnerable to
re-victimization. There were numerous positive consequences as a result of
being sexually assaulted; however, there were significantly more negative
consequences. These negative consequences often had a more profound effect on
the woman. A woman with a victim mentality allows things to happen to her, is
powerless, hopeless, passive, has a lack of agency in the circumstances of her
life, and/or feels worthless. Three women who had a victim mentality were not
re-victimized and 27 re-victimizations occurred among the women when they
had victim mentalities. Three of the women had a victim mentality at the time of
the interview but had not been recently re-victimized. Mabiha had a
circumstance that set her apart from the other women. Mabiha had a victim
mentality after she was sexually assaulted when she was young. Mabiha grew up
and became more mature before she was assaulted again and in her adulthood
developed more control and ability to think things through. Although she had a
victim mentality and was not assaulted, she developed a survivor mentality later
on in life and she was protected from re-victimization. Bilquis, who was
sexually assaulted by her step-father and raped by her husband, described herself
as “still here” and lacked agency in her own circumstances in her life. Gayatri,
another person with a victim mentality, said she has not been careful and is not
sure why she hasn’t been sexually assaulted again; however, it may be because
108 | P a g e
she has not gone on any dates in the last year. Prajakta was the other woman
with a victim mentality that had not been re-victimized; however, I interviewed
her only a few weeks after her most recent victimization.
CONCLUSION
Previous research had studied re-victimization and one specific other factor;
however, none of the research did a comprehensive study involving all of the
factors included in this study and how that leads to a woman’s perception of
herself whether it is as a survivor or as a victim. Additionally, previous research
did not connect how a victim mentality or a survivor mentality affected whether
or not a woman was re-victimized. The purpose of the study was to fill in the
gap where research was lacking. This study explored the important combined
factors that are common in women who have experienced re-victimization and
how she views herself as a victim or a survivor. The following factors were used
to gain a better understanding of a woman’s victim mentality or survivor
mentality: social support, self-blame, social reactions, substance use, alcohol
use, risk taking behavior, risky sexual behavior, acknowledgment status, PTSD
symptoms, and coping strategies. I conducted 20 interviews with 20 women who
have previously been raped or sexually assaulted on one or more than one
occasion. All of the women had negative consequences of the assault, such as
low self-esteem, promiscuity, sexual remission, insecurity, and self-blame. In
general, these negative consequences lead to a victim mentality. Some women
were able to find positive consequences resulting from the sexual assault, such
as becoming a better mother, being more aware of her surroundings, or they
were able to keep others from getting assaulted or helping them through it if they
were assaulted. The ability to find positive consequences allowed many women
to develop a survivor mentality. The women with a victim mentality were re-
victimized and the women with a survivor mentality were not re-victimized.
This research suggests that a survivor mentality protects a woman from re-
victimization and a victim mentality makes her vulnerable to re-victimization.
Because of the rather small sample size, the information was able to be managed
and analyzed by me. With a larger sample of participants and the many
109 | P a g e
variables, it might be advantageous for future researchers to explore the use of
the many options available today for qualitative research and analysis, such as
The SAGE Qualitative Research Kit. The fact that the present research sample
was small made the need for such a tool not as critical. This research largely fills
the void in current research, which was lacking a connection between the various
factors leading to re-victimization. However, future research should continue to
be done in the area of survivor and victim mentality. This is a qualitative study
where I conducted in-depth interviews with a small sample size. This area of
study would benefit from having a quantitative research study conducted with a
significant participant pool.
Based on the information discovered through the interviews and analysis, many
programs and policies can be developed to prevent or lessen the amount of re-
victimization that occurs. Early counselling for women who have been
victimized would be beneficial in decreasing re-victimization as it can lead
women to adapting a survivor mentality rather than a victim mentality.
Support systems or groups, especially a group where the woman could remain
anonymous and feel safe in sharing her feelings, should be created to help
women develop a survivor mentality. These support systems should have the
same rules of confidentiality and acceptance as Alcoholics Anonymous or
Narcotics Anonymous. Self-defense classes where women are taught how to
walk and talk and act with confidence should be implemented in schools or after
school programs. If women learn how to walk and talk with confidence, they
will not look like prey to a predator and it will decrease the number of women
who are re-victimized. Sexual assault service programs often have advocates
who arrive at the hospital after a woman is raped or sexually assaulted. The
sexual assault service programs should focus on spending more time with the
women who were assaulted and providing counseling services more quickly to
help the women develop the survivor mentality sooner rather than later. Every
day a woman has a victim mentality is another day she is more likely to be re-
victimized. Though this research focuses on the person who was sexually
assaulted, there are policy implications that can be drawn, which focus on the
perpetrator. Related to the previous suggestion of discussing appropriate
touching, classes could be given to grade level students where they discuss
appropriate types of behavior in relationships and when a relationship is not a
healthy relationship and how to end unhealthy relationships. Often children
develop behaviors from observing their parents' relationships and adapting those
behaviors for themselves. If we are able to educate people (for this particular
study, it is males), how to treat their significant other and/or women in general, it
111 | P a g e
may prevent a person from adapting unhealthy behaviors. In addition to
preventing perpetrators, implications can be drawn for perpetrators who have
already been arrested and sentenced as perpetrators. Though it would be ideal, it
is unrealistic to believe that all perpetrators can change their ways. However, it
is realistic to believe that some perpetrators can change their ways. If one
perpetrator changes his ways and does not assault again, the program would be
successful. Perpetrators that have been sentence should be required to attend
classes that educate them on how to treat others, deal with anger management,
and divert the urge to commit sexual assault into a different, healthier behavior.
For those perpetrators that continually sexually assault others, there should be
harsher prison sentences and more significant restitution requirements. In recent
months, California has passed a bill which attempts to combat the significant
amount of sexual assaults that occur on college campuses. It is often referred to
as the "Yes Means Yes" bill. This law affects college state funding and will not
allow the college to receive state funds if they do not adhere to these new policy
implications. It changes the definition of sexual consent to require "an
affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity" by
all persons involved (Student Safety: Sexual Assault of 2014). The policy states
that the complainant cannot consent if he/she is asleep or unconscious, under the
influence of drugs, alcohol, or medication, or is unable to communicate due to a
mental or physical condition. Additionally, the standard for determining guilt of
the accused is the preponderance of the evidence which is a lower level of
certainty than beyond a reasonable doubt (the standard for determining guilt in a
court of law). Though this bill has negative and positive aspects, it demonstrates
that the public and lawmakers are aware of the ongoing issue and prevalence of
sexual assault in our community and are making an effort to effect positive
change (Student Safety: Sexual Assault of 2014).
112 | P a g e
REFERENCES
Personal interviews conducted on 20 numbers of women with the history of a sexual assault.
113 | P a g e
Maternity benefit Act, 1961. https://legislative.gov.in
Babbie, E. (2005). The basics of social research (3rd ed.). Canada: Thomson Wadsworth.
Barnes, J. E., Noll, J. G., Putnam, F. W., & Trickett, P. K. (2009). Sexual and physical re-
victimization among victims of severe childhood abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 412-420.
Borja, S. E., Callahan, J. L., & Long, P. J. (2006). Positive and negative adjustment and social
support of sexual assault survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19, 905-914.
Brosi, M. W., & Rolling, E. S. (2010). A narrative journey for intimate partner violence: From
victim to survivor. The Indian Journal of Family Therapy, 38(3), 237-250.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
Caine, K. J., Davison, C. M., & Stewart, E. J. (2009). Preliminary field-work: methodological
reflections from northern Canadian research. Qualitative Research, 9(4), 489-513.
Combs-Lane, A. M., & Smith, D. W. (2002). Risk of sexual victimization in college women: The
role of behavioral intentions and risk-taking behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(2),
165-183.
Dunn, J. L. (2005). Victims and survivors: Emerging vocabularies of motive for “battered
women who stay”. Sociological Inquiry, 75(1), 1-30.
Fargo, J. D. (2009). Pathways to adult sexual re-victimization: Direct and indirect behavioral risk
factors across the lifespan. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(11), 1771-1791.
Fortier, M. A., DiLillo, D., Messman-Moore, T. L., Peugh, J., DeNardi, K. A., & Gaffey, K. J.
(2009). Severity of child sexual abuse and re-victimization: The mediating role of coping and
trauma symptoms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 308-320.
Francis, D. (2004). Learning from participants in field based research. Cambridge Journal of
Education, 34(3), 265-277.
He, N., Zhao, J., & Ren, L. (2005). Do race and gender matter in police stress? A preliminary
assessment of the interactive effects. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(6), 535-547.
Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T., & Andersen, H. (1995). The role of ethnography in interactive
systems design. Lancaster, UK: CSEG. Hunter, S. V. (2010). Evolving narratives about
114 | P a g e
childhood sexual abuse: Challenging the dominance of the victim and survivor paradigm.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 31(2), 176-190.
Kahn, A. S., Mathie, V. A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgment.
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53-66.
Kilpatrick, D. G., Acierno, R., Resnick, H. S., Saunders, B. E., & Best, C. L. (1997). A 2-year
longitudinal analysis of the relationships between violent assault and substance use in women.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 834-847.
Koss, M. P., & Dinero, T. E. (1989). Discriminant analysis of risk factors for sexual
victimization among a national sample of college women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 57(2), 242-250.
Kuban, C., & Steele, W. (2011). Restoring safety and hope: From victim to survivor. Reclaiming
Children & Youth, 20(1), 41-44.
Layman, M. J., Gidycz, C. A., & Lynn, S. J. (1996). Unacknowledged versus acknowledged rape
victims: Situational factors and posttraumatic stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 124-
131.
Littleton, H., Axsom, D., & Grills-Taquechel, A. (2009). Sexual assault victims’
acknowledgment status and re-victimization risk. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 34-42
Macy, R. J., Nurius, P. S., & Norris, J. (2006). Responding in their best interests:
Contextualizing women’s coping with acquaintance sexual aggression. Violence Against
Women, 12(5), 478-500.
Maier, S. L. (2008). “I have heard horrible stories .”: Rape victim advocates perception of the re-
victimization of rape victims by the police and medical system. Violence Against Women, 14(7),
786-808.
Mason, G. E., Ullman, S., Long, S. E., Long, L., & Starzynski, L. (2009). Social support and risk
of sexual assault re-victimization. Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 58-72.
Messman-Moore, T. L., Walsh, K. L., & DiLillo, D. (2010). Emotion dysregulation and risky
sexual behavior in re-victimization. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 967- 976.
Messman-Moore, T., Ward, R. M., & Brown, A. (2009). Substance use and PTSD symptoms
impact the likelihood of rape and re-victimization in college women. Journal of Interpersonal
Violence, 24(3), 499-521.
Morris, R. G., & Marquart, J. W. (2010). In the classroom and on the streets: How to teach
qualitative field research to criminology/criminal justice graduate students. Journal of Criminal
Justice Education, 21(4), 526-539.
Niehaus, A. F., Jackson, J., & Davies, S. (2010). Sexual self-schemas of female child sexual
abuse survivors: Relationships with risky sexual behavior and sexual assault in adolescence.
Archives Sex Behavior, 39, 1359-1374.
Park, C. L., Zlateva, I., & Blank, T. O. (2009). Self-identity after cancer: “Survivor”, “victim”,
“patient”, and “person with cancer”. JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24(2), 430-
435.
Patten, M. L. (2009). Understanding research methods: An overview of the essentials (7th ed.).
Glendale, Ca: Pyrczak Publishing. Patterson, D., & Campbell, R. (2010). Why rape survivors
participate in the criminal justice system. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(2), 191-205.
115 | P a g e
Phanichrat, T., & Townshend, J. M. (2010). Coping strategies used by survivors of childhood
sexual abuse on the journey to recovery. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 19, 62-78.
Sigmon, S. T., Green, M. P., Rohan, K. J., & Nichols, J. E. (1996). Coping and adjustment in
male and female survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 4(2), 279-
297.
Stevens, T. N., Ruggiero, K. J., Kilpatrick, D. G., Resnick, H. S., & Saunders, B. E. (2005).
Variables differentiating singly and multiply victimized youth: Results from the national survey
of adolescents and implications for secondary prevention. Child Maltreatment, 10(3), 211-223.
Student Safety: Sexual Assault, Cal. S. B. 967 (2013-2014), Chapter 748 (Cal. Stat. 2014).
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against
women: Findings from the national violence against women survey. New Delhi: INDIAN
Department of Justice.
Ullman, S. E., Starzynski, L. L., Long, S. M., Mason, G. E., & Long, L. M. (2008). Exploring
the relationships of women’s sexual assault disclosure, social reactions, and problem drinking.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(9),1235-1257.
INDIAN Department of Justice. (2009). Crime in the India: Forcible Rape. Wood, E. (2006).
The ethical challenges of field research in conflict zones. Qualitative Sociology, 29(3), 373-386.
116 | P a g e
THANK YOU
117 | P a g e