mportant Facts about Armed Forces Tribunal

The exam-relevant facts about Armed Forces Tribunal are mentioned below:

1. It is an Indian military tribunal.

2. It is a statutory body. (Learn the difference between statutory and quasi-judicial bodies in the
linked article.)
3. The principal bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal is located in New Delhi.
4. Armed Forces Tribunal has regional benches located in the cities mentioned below:

 Chandigarh – Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Chandigarh

 Lucknow – Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand

 Kolkata – West Bengal, Bihar, Jharkhand, Orissa and U.T. of Andaman and Nicobar
Islands

 Guwahati – North-East Region

 Chennai – Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Pondicherry

 Kochi – Kerala, Karnataka and Lakshadweep

 Mumbai – Maharashtra and Gujarat

 Jaipur – Rajasthan

 Jabalpur – Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh

 Jammu – Jammu and Kashmir

5. Regional benches of Chandigarh and Lucknow have three benches each while the remaining have
a single bench.
6. The tribunal follows the procedure as is practised in the High Court of India; and for that Armed
Forces Tribunal ( Procedure) rules, 2008 are followed by it.
7. Only a retired SC judge or a retired Chief Justice of High Court can become the chairperson
8. Paramilitary forces are not considered to be a part of the Armed Forces Tribunal jurisdiction

Composition of the Armed Forces Tribunal

The tribunal is composed of:

1. Judicial Members – They are the retired high court judges.

2. Administrative Members – They are either retired members of the Armed Forces or a Judge
Advocate General. The qualifications to be appointed as the administrative members of the Armed
Forces Tribunal are:

 For retirees from Armed Forces – Holder of a rank of Major General or an equivalent post
or above for a period of three years or more.
  For Judge Advocate General – Experience in the post for at least one year.

3. The current organizational structure of the Armed Forces Tribunal (As of 30th November 2020) is:

 Chairperson of Armed Forces Tribunal (Principal Bench) – Justice Rajendra Menon

 Members – Justice Mrs Sunil Gupta, Lt.Gen. Phillip Campose, Air Marshal BBP Sinha,
and Lt. Gen. PM Hariz

Note: There is a dress code for the members of the Armed Forces Tribunal:

 White shirt
 Collar band, and
 Black coat/ jacket

There are other constitutional, statutory and quasi-judicial bodies in India. Read about them in the linked
article.

Jurisdiction of Armed Forces Tribunal | Powers/Functions

1. The Armed Forces Tribunal is empowered to adjudicate appeals against any order, decision,
finding or sentence passed by a court-martial or any matter connected therewith or incidental
thereto.
2. The tribunal is empowered to grant bail to an accused who is in military custody. The bail so
provided can be with or without conditions as the tribunal may decide.
3. The circumstances for the tribunal to allow the appeal against court martial orders are:

 The court martial findings are legally not sustainable.

 The court martial findings include wrong decisions on questions of law.

 Miscarriage of justice due to material irregularity.

4. The Armed Forces Tribunal can take the following actions over the order of the court-martial:

 Remit the whole sentence or a part of a sentence with or without conditions

 Mitigate the awarded punishment

 Commute the punishment to a lesser one or even enhance it.

 Release the appellant on parole with or without conditions.

 Suspend the sentence of imprisonment

 Modify order as it thinks appropriate

5. The Armed Forces Tribunal acts as a criminal court for the purposes of relevant sections of the
Indian Penal Code and Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. (Know in detail
about Criminal Courts in India in the linked article.)

Who can appeal before the Armed Forces Tribunal?

An aggrieved person by the court martial order, decision or finding can appeal before the Armed Forces
Tribunal.

Note:

1. The tribunal can also dismiss the appeal if the court martial findings are found to be justified.
2. The tribunal can allow an appeal against conviction.
3. Any appeal by a person against a decision given by the tribunal can only be taken up in the
Supreme Court.