TRINITY INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES RANKED A+ CATEGORY INSTITUTE OF GGSIPU,DELHI PNP Y aa: \a on)FACTS OF THE CASE BCU UCR nr GRC ur Runner ey ene Gree ie Abe ute ee eure Cee Ste CECE R aU COE Cg CU Rac et Cg economy through a variety of income generating mechanisms. Dene iA ee MoCo Cie aor Me Ucar curt Po Cu UCSC Uta cm CCM Cun POC Ui eC Na: eMC Cm Cel eae Ur rong Bsns G use re Re ae cee rr) PCOS RUC Ce NaC RR Rear CUR Pacifica. Isola, being a densely populated island nation has become STS Cte Ur Stuer act Ue ceo Menu nonce Manu Relea ae a Lan Pct me Meek m Reo ACC eC a Com eee ee Cae TC a Ce STE Ue POISE Weise a Une eM oe ne Co Rae EY regressive standing between the two. Pacifica shares its maritime boundary RTM a SCS CC CRC tet Ria toe Ur sovereignty against Isola multiple times. But in a proactive attempt to See Or ane Ct ar eee eee tact Rega PO RCE ame essa CCRC aU Beco started to take place between Isola and these island nations. This, however _ does not please the cause of Pacifica and consequently, " 4.Pacifica, with compelling urgency, delineates the socioeconomic Ces CenrC m Cc Cus im mma ccc UC a oR ee eR ee on ance Cae eS na eo A disruption of traditional fishing grounds and the diminishing fish stocks due to Isola's activities have already led to economic hardship for coastal Se a eae er me OMT OR eat Sua Sie COSC ite a Ce Ee CT Pears ecu ue cu a a eke eR iis Demo eS CoRR eis UCU CEU: BCCI u ae eg De eceet ee Tnnig ste ae na ee oe OPC nan Wace Meee ee aU Cu uc cy Pee ee eee Co) Ce CU eR eee CC eee Lee Cae CMR RS Me MLM cure Maca CiCea tan Ge cee MC ceo)Se US Cae eC ee Cee a eco Mme MT lg EUnet Mar eo once cea ce GUC eO eRe cena euc ee enter Re Rm ac Cease ee nacre Cane cour mur amuse) Chey GIR eR CnC a Cu ome Cu ein Me Ciums an ae Umer TE Cetus amc Rees Can mut ean ce mm tt a) integral to its cultural identity and historical narratives. Isola vehemently SSAC amar Grn ROE at Ce CUS ucts BUR te tae ie ore ei Or UN ue Re eu Ne CMe inet recur Re ICUS Oe nena Cie ere Ce ee anne ee Cm Lary Ge inertia cers cca eu aecet icin ain etic tut Rial cla oe 7. In response, Pacifica vehemently denies any alignment with external powers seeking to intervene in regional affairs. It stresses its commitment to upholding international law and engaging in diplomatic solutions to protect its maritime Tce oie Me a ON Le Co MO ol OH Cee a eae euCce Cate cncCine emer) Secretar UC ene eactnie cee nen urn’ CaineeCeCCrent iets san) Pa Re RUB ak elite and contemporary legal principles, striking a balance between sovereignty and Roleaeie rinisacaariiaeorearites Beat eee icc CuecemU Ruee ielat Rett ials Seto ee Oe RRC ee Mle ae LO CCU Cnn eet ear Race cen ied See CRE er at Meee mer rte LAU EL eg SEC Mu ue RUC Melia mW MN emer tie Mee Leelee eu RT aR el CCR eC mo Cc "state under UNCLOS to sustainably manage and benefit from its natural eR eae et CU a co) which Isola's actions breach Pacifica's rights and responsibilities for resource COU ue CS A RU Uoe ON Guenter ne gear i Co Uae ci Pree Geen nace caer uci a meee) Reece et ana hee ena ue Cuca err ia Cee Rue turuse CoRR Cuma mane re ty destabilizing the entire region. Pacifica urges the ICJ to consider the urgent Gee Ree eRe en RCC nec on eS CTT eur U Ue eee she ee ae ei ee Racesee ee neu cree meeG et eesti POC ene ne Tae a ee ee Ces Da ree eee CR elt fe om OM Ete Wn eer RC ues uuu Ret cn Ne Sec Re Ua een oe a once Reco ee minut rejects internationalization of what it perceives as historical domestic affairs Bee or oe Or UN cura unis ice s aan case raises a critical legal query regarding the evaluation and reconciliation eeu iC mu ie nec particularly UNCLOS. The ICJ faces the challenge of balancing historical DC Sau mee Meu Ue Oc ee Cer ad Pree RR eRe CUE CUE Lo PEM ie eee Cie eae nat cian a te eae eC tc Uc meen me TMs Ce ec CoM TCU me Ca affiliations with non-regional powers as potential threats. The case prompts a eee urea eeu etc cr idee amare iene eho Muec a CoM nM ure Mec Com ag Hera cance er CR Pune ec ecurd ein om tet lee Rese Cutscene rasa a its Neem Cnc cm Uae come ed Gece uC Grae s Pee Mee on ee iC aT CRN cur RO ere ce So nation emphasizes UNCLOS' fundamental objective of fostering cooperation SEC CRe UR cau ten taka ate Cantar eect) Sea OC RL ec ue ue ue Ca Uo Cee ae CC Ue Ouse Oran urea kT aca) PS Coat Renae aan RCC Ce DRUG o ce Re cue tk Uece arene oles} Cesar cae Cur Us te rue egret Ree Cee ic Mcec ears este UL ue uLe PEM Me to RU eM ett er ec aa Cr Cee Cae cee See Cen eC U ua acne Or home Rec I aU) ST Ue Ce Ly Sa UN RM ee Ue le mC ce See CIS eect Cuca ae CUCU Ter corse ar Be eee en cuss ee Cue Cenc er kmh pec ae Se rece Re eee ect atte ae region.ISSUES OF THE CASE 1.Whether Pacifica's failure to assert its rights or pursue legal remedies in response to historical agreements, understandings, or other prior dealings with Isola amounts to a waiver, and if so, whether such waiver impacts the maintainability of certain claims brought before the International Court of Justice? 2.Whether Isola's actions allegedly affecting Pacifica's fishing industry align with UNCLOS provisions regarding the management and benefit of natural resources within Lav a-¥4 3.Whether UNCLOS provide mechanisms to prevent Tice aRe Malte MMe MeLe Relea g a right to defend its territories, creating a legal conflict between maritime governance principles and national security interests? | 4.Whether the present case would serve the interest of BIE tel d axles WNGR iS ess neC Leernna ce ane cu Cu eur Ir Pema ar et etter enero tie aieur urns Pacer mae cone ur me cue nt com neta cee meee ee CaN cu rua etme cree cl usec? CORLEW ic ucien mC rie een ns cece lod foc ae aes Cun tear usar estar etait rie eto