Professional Documents
Culture Documents
"Eat Bulaga" hosts Tito Sotto, Vic Sotto and Joey de Leon
STAR / File
MANILA, Philippines — After more than 40 years as one of the most
successful noontime TV shows in the Philippines, Eat Bulaga and its titular
cast parted ways over various unresolved differences.
The split was set off by a bitter spat between the management of Television
and Production Exponents, Inc. (TAPE) and its cast members, top billed by
Tito Sotto, Vic Sotto, and Joey De Leon (TVJ).
Trademark vs copyright
First, it's important to know the difference between a trademark and
copyright.
Atty. Anthony Peralta, a senior partner at Consunji, Bonifacio & Peralta law
offices, defined a trademark as which “refers to a name, a brand, or a logo
given to goods or services to distinguish it from others.”
“For example, for every episode of 'Ang Probinsyano' they filed copyright
applications so that no one would copy it,” Peralta, who also teaches at the
De La Salle University College of Law, told Philstar.com in an interview.
The TVJ trio and Antonio Tuviera — co-founder of TAPE who tapped Tito,
Vic and Joey to host Eat Bulaga in 1979 — applied for the trademark of the
brand on Feb. 27, 2023, but it is still under review by the Intellectual
Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL).
What now?
The IPOPHL has its hands full, as it will need to scrutinize the application of
the longtime hosts of Eat Bulaga. Peralta noted that a principle in
trademark law is "first to file".
A review could take three to six months, considering that the IPOPHL is
one of the most advanced across Asia, Peralta said.
Developments?
In a statement sent to Philstar.com on Wednesday, IPOHPL said it issued
a notice to TAPE on June 6 to answer a petition filed by TVJ on June
2 seeking the cancellation of the “Eat Bulaga” and “EB” trademarks.
The petition fell under the purview of Section 151 of the Philipppines’ IP
code, which indicates that "any person who believes that he is or will be
damaged by the registration of a mark" may file a petition to cancel directed
to the IPOPHL’s Bureau of Legal Affairs.
In this case, the IPOPHL floated two scenarios. If TAPE fails to file an
answer to the petition, the decision will be declared in default. The decision
would then be reviewed by an adjudication officer based on merits and
facts, including petitions and pieces of evidence submitted.
But if TAPE files an answer, the two parties are mandated to undergo
mediation.
“If they reach an amicable settlement, the case will be deemed resolved
based on a Compromise Agreement approved by the BLA. However, if
there is no settlement, the cases will be assigned to an Adjudication Officer
for proper resolution or decision,” the IPOPHL said.
TAPE has 30 days upon receipt of the notice to file and answer
TVJ's petition.
“They (TAPE) should apply before June 14, they should not wait until the
last day,” Peralta said.