Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1007/s12206-023-0718-9
Citation:
Zhang, Y., He, Z., Liu, C., Wang, M., Abstract The current advanced aero-engine fan rotors are usually integrally-bladed rotor
Xuan, H., Qu, M., Fang, Z. (2023). Re- discs, and the root of the fan blade has irregular curved surface, which brings technical difficul-
search on the explosion release method
and damage mechanism of titanium alloy ties and challenges to achieve the blade releasing. In this paper, the dynamic response and
fan blade. Journal of Mechanical Science energy dissipation process of the titanium alloy blade under shaped charge jet explosion were
and Technology 37 (8) (2023) ?~?. analyzed by numerical model, and the explosion damage mechanism of titanium alloy fan
http://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-0718-9
blades was clarified. Finally, a FBO test was conducted to verify the blade explosion release
method in rotating state. Through the energy dissipation analysis of the whole explosion proc-
Received November 24th, 2022 ess, it can be seen that the overall residual kinetic energy of the blade is about 15.7 J, which is
Revised March 5th, 2023 only 0.02 % of the initial kinetic energy of the releasing blade in rotating. It is indicated that the
Accepted April 10th, 2023 explosion separation method will not generate additional kinetic energy to the released blade.
† Recommended by Editor
Chongdu Cho
1. Introduction
Aero-engine includes many high-speed rotor components, such as fan, compressor, turbine,
etc. When these rotor parts are impacted by external objects (such as bird strike) or damaged
by material fatigue, it is easy to cause blade released-off. The rotor blade fragments will impact
the casing, causing serious damage. If the casing is not strong enough to contain broken rotor
fragments, the fragments may penetrate the casing, causing the engine to lose power, and
even further impact the oil circuit, control circuit or other structural components of the aircraft.
Such "uncontainment accident" of the engine is easy to cause catastrophic consequences [1].
Considering the serious consequences of aero-engine un-containment accidents, the world's
aviation powers have strict rules on the casing containment, such as the federal aviation regu-
lations (FAR-33) in the United States [2], European Union Aero Engine Certification Specifica-
tion (CS-E 810) [3], China Aviation Engine Airworthiness Regulations (CCAR-33) [4]. Article
33.94 of FAR-33 stipulates: it must be demonstrated by engine tests that the engine is capable
of containing damage without catching fire and without failure of its mounting attachments when
operated for at least 15 seconds, unless the resulting engine damage induces a self shutdown
after the event of “Failure of the most critical compressor or fan blade while operating at maxi-
mum permissible r.p.m”. The blade failure must occur at the outermost retention groove or, for
integrally-bladed rotor discs, at least 80 percent of the blade must fail.
The blade release speed needs to be precisely controlled in the containment test. If the
speed is too high or too low, it will directly affect the damage of the casing, which will greatly
interfere with the reasonable design of the casing [5]. Therefore, the precise and controllable
© The Korean Society of Mechanical blade released-off technology at constant speed is one of the key technologies in the casing
Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH containment test. At present, there are three mainstream blade released-off methods, namely
Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023
1
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 37 (8) 2023 DOI 10.1007/s12206-023-0718-9
2
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 37 (8) 2023 DOI 10.1007/s12206-023-0718-9
3
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 37 (8) 2023 DOI 10.1007/s12206-023-0718-9
4
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 37 (8) 2023 DOI 10.1007/s12206-023-0718-9
⎛1⎞
2.3 Material model and parameters D = ∫ ⎜ ⎟ dε ep (6)
⎝ εf ⎠
In the explosion numerical simulation, the material model is
used to describe the dynamic response of the material under where the failure strain is defined as:
the action of external force, such as deformation, flow and
fracture. The material model can be divided into three parts:
equation of state, constitutive model and failure model. The
(
ε f = D1 + D2e D σ 3
∗
) (1 + D ln ε )(1 + D T )
4
∗
5
∗
(7)
5
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 37 (8) 2023 DOI 10.1007/s12206-023-0718-9
TNT_*MAT
-3 -3 -1
ρ/(g/cm ) A/GPa B/GPa R1 R2 ω E/(J·m ) D/(m·s ) Pcj/GPa
9
1.0 371 3.2 4.5 1.5 0.3 3.6×10 6097 7.63
TC4_*MAT_JOHNSON_COOK
-3
ρ(g/cm ) G/ GPa E/ GPa PR A/GPa B/GPa N C
-2 -2
4.44 0.410 1.13 0.33 1.098×10 1.092×10 0.93 0.014
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5
-0.09 0.27 0.48 0.014 3.87
TC4_*EOS_GRUNEISEN
C S1 S2 S3 γ α E0 V0
0.513 1.03 0 0 1.23 0 0 1
Pb_*MAT_Steinberg-Guinan
G0/GPa σ0/MPa σmax/MPa β n GP′ GT′ (MPa/K) σ P′
-4
8.6 8 100 110 0.52 1 -9.98 9.30×10
Pb_*EOS_SHOCK
3
ρ0/(kg/m ) Γ C0/(m/s) S
11340 2.74 2006 1.43
6
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 37 (8) 2023 DOI 10.1007/s12206-023-0718-9
(a) SG1
(b) SG2
(c) SG3
(1#) (2#)
4 X Direction 4 X Direction
Y Direction Y Direction
Acceleration(×105 m/s2)
Acceleration(×105 m/s2)
2 2
0 0
0.1
0.02
-2 -2
0.0
0.00
-4 -4 -0.1
-0.02 40 50 60 70 80
40 50 60 70 80
(3#) (4#)
4 X Direction 2 X Direction
Y Direction Y Direction
Acceleration(×105 m/s2)
Acceleration(×105 m/s2)
2 1
0 0
-2 -1
-4 -2
As shown in Fig. 8, in the direction of blade thickness, the pulse width of 3# and 4# is basically maintained at about
high-frequency pulse width of Gauss points 1# and 2# are 0.06 ms. Although the 1#-4# Gauss points of the blade are in
basically maintained at about 0.02 ms, and the high-frequency the same position of the jet, there is a significant difference in
7
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 37 (8) 2023 DOI 10.1007/s12206-023-0718-9
4 4
(5#) X Direction (6#) X Direction
Y Direction Y Direction
2 2
Acceleration(×105 m/s2)
Acceleration(×105 m/s2)
0 0
0.6
-2 0.3 -2
0.5
0.0
-0.3
0.0
-0.6
-4 70 80 90 100 -4
100 105 110 115 120
8
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 37 (8) 2023 DOI 10.1007/s12206-023-0718-9
3. Static explosion test The static explosion test device is shown in Fig. 11.
3.1 Test method design
3.2 Static explosion test results
Compared with the traditional equal-thickness flat specimen,
the complex surface structure of the fan blade has obvious The static explosion test results are shown in Fig. 12. The
variable thickness characteristics, which leads to uneven stress damage and deformation on both sides of the explosive are
distribution in the section during the blast cutting process. relatively small, but the damage along the thickness direction is
Therefore, in order to effectively obtain a reasonable surface relatively large. The reason is that the main intrusion manner of
explosive cutting method, it is necessary to carry out experi- the shaped jet explosion is the high-pressure impact damage
mental verification. Because there is no centrifugal load of the along the thickness direction. By comparing SG1 and SG2, it
blade in the static test, only the local damage caused by the can be seen that the explosive cutting effect of the shaped jet
explosion needs to be considered. Therefore, 1/3 of the overall is stable, which is basically the same as the simlulation.
blade is selected as the static explosion test sample to facilitate For the SG3 specimen, the middle opening is used for ex-
sample processing and reduce manufacturing costs. The three plosive cutting in this specimen. Since the specimen is a
blade slotting schemes in Fig. 4 were selected to process the curved structure, the thickness in the middle is much larger
static explosion. than that in the two sides. Therefore, most of the energy is lost
In the test, the shell of the shaped jet cutter should have a from the weak points on both sides during the explosion, result-
good constraining effect on the energy of the explosion. Plum- ing in an insignificant effect of explosion damage on the SG3
bum is selected as the shell material for its large density and specimen. In order to accurately evaluate the residual strength
ductility. TNT explosives with high power and high explosive of the specimen after the explosion, the static tensile strength
pressure are selected, and the detonating device adopts elec- tests of the specimens were carried out on a tensile testing
tronically controlled detonators. machine.
During the test installation process, the electronically con- Through the quasi-static tensile test, the residual strength of
trolled detonator and the TNT explosive were put into the load- the TC4 simulated blade after the blasting test is obtained. The
ing position together. One end of the electronically controlled experimental objects are TC4 blade simulation specimens with
detonator was connected to the TNT explosive, and the other different slotting methods (after the blasting test), as shown in
end was connected to the detonation signal line. In order to Fig. 12. The test was conducted on the MTS test system, the
ensure that the TNT explosives on both sides can be deto- protective load was set to 120 KN. As the target breaking load
nated at the same time, a high-speed detonating cord is se- should be lower than 30 % of the released blade centrifugal
lected to connect and fix the TNT explosives on both sides. load. So δmax is marked as the target limit load.
The tensile specimens are shown in Fig. 13, where both the
Fig. 11. Static explosion test device. Fig. 12. The explosion results of the blades simulation.
9
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 37 (8) 2023 DOI 10.1007/s12206-023-0718-9
120
SG1
SG2
100
δmax
SG3
80
Force/kN
60
Area—α
40
20
0
0 1 2 3 4
Displacement/mm
SG1 and SG2 specimens were pulled off within the limit load.
Fig. 15. Schematic diagram of rotating explosion test system.
After the blasting test, there were obvious cracks at both ends
inside the slot. During the tensile test, the stress is concen-
trated at the crack tip, and some internal damage has accumu- drive shaft of the spin test bench. A safety protection ring is
lated, so it is more likely to be pulled off. However, the SG3 installed inside the tester to withstand the impact of the releas-
was not broken under the target load δmax, because the remain- ing blade.
ing area of the blade basin was too large, so it could not be In the test detonation system, the lead wire of the electric
easily broken. detonator is connected to the wireless detonation signal receiver,
The force-displacement curve of the specimen during the and a signal antenna is installed inside the test cavity. The deto-
tensile process as shown in Fig. 14. The peak loads of the SG1 nation signal is transmitted through the external detonation con-
and SG2 specimens are 56 KN and 52 KN, respectively, less trol circuit to realize the explosion released-off process.
than 30 % of the centrifugal load δmax. It is worth noting that in The blades used in the test are installed 180 degrees sym-
the force-displacement curve of the SG1 test piece, it can be metrically. The blade tip size is about 1020 mm. During the test,
seen that its tensile process has experienced two stages, indi- the rotor was speed up to 13600 r/min and keep steady for
cating that the two ends of the test piece SG1 are not simulta- 30 s. Then the detonation signal was given. When the blade is
neously fractured. Due to the different residual areas on both released by explosion, the blade impact the containment guard
sides of the SC1 specimen, the residual area on one side is ring, cuts off the trigger wire wound inside the guard ring. A
small. During the stretching process, the small position of the trigger signal is formed and triggers the speed control system
remaining area is first broken when the peak load is reached, to control the test bench to slow down and stop in time. At the
and then the main force-bearing part becomes the other side same time, the high-speed camera installed at the bottom of
until all the ends are broken, as shown in the area α in Fig. 14. the test bench was also trigged to photograph the process of
Considering that both ends of the SG1 test piece are not blade released off.
broken at the same time, the released attitude of the blade will According to the static blasting test results of the previous
change in the rotating state, so the test piece SG1 is not a blade simulation parts, the same method was used in the rotat-
preferred solution. The SG3 specimen was not broken at ing blasting test. The installation method of the explosion de-
120 KN, which was higher than the requirement of 30 % cen- vice and the blade slotting method in rotation test are the same
trifugal load δmax. In summary, the slotting method of the as those of the specimen SG2 in static test. The lead wire of
specimen SG2 is selected as the optimal solution. the electric detonator is connected to the detonation system
and controlled by wireless detonation. During the test, when
the rotor reached to the predetermined speed and maintains
4. Blade explosion release test under rotat- the load, the detonation button was pressed to output the deto-
ing conditions nation signal, so that the blades break and released-off at the
According to the previous simulation and static explosion test predetermined speed. The installation process of the explosive
research, the appropriate explosion separation method was device is shown in Fig. 16.
determined. In order to further evaluate the effectiveness of the The high-speed photography results of blade rotational ex-
explosion separation method of complex curved blades, the plosions are shown in Fig. 17. The test results show that the
explosion separation method was tested and verified on a high- explosion released-off mode has high reliability, and the explo-
speed spin tester. The schematic diagram of the overall struc- sion firelight control is good in high-speed photography. The
ture and test system of the fan blade rotating explostion re- explosion regulation does not affect the actual shooting results,
leased-off test is shown in Fig. 15. Two fan blades are symmet- and the released posture of the explosion blade is stable, and
rically mounted on the disc. The disc is connected to the power the two blades almost break at the same time. Fan blade rota-
10
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 37 (8) 2023 DOI 10.1007/s12206-023-0718-9
t = 0 ms t = 0.3 ms
t = 0.8 ms t = 1.2 ms
Fig. 20. SEM of the explosion fracture of the released fan blade section.
tion explosion fracture damage is shown in Fig. 18. It can be
seen that the damage forms of explosion section and tensile
fracture are obviously different in blade fracture. The fracture of and crushed debris can be obviously observed at the fracture
the explosive released-off section is relatively neat, while the of blasting. The fault damage is mainly concentrated at the
tensile sections on both sides show obvious tensile morphology. explosion fracture, and shows multi-layer fault damage. This
The comparison of fan blade explosion damage between the indicates that the high-energy shock wave generated by the
simulation and test results in are shown in Fig. 19. The explo- fan blade in the shaped charge jet explosion is rapidly released
sion damage forms of fan blades are mainly concentrated in along the jet direction, which causes great damage to the
the place where TNT is placed (A) and its two ends (M and N). curved surface structure and leads to multiple faults, which is
From the damage form at A, it can be seen that TNT has a consistent with the change trend of Gaussian point energy
good destructive effect on the blade. Since the blade is a along the jet direction in the simulation results. In addition, a
curved structure, which also causes the damage at M and N is large number of cracks, ranging from 4 μm to 16 μm, were
very obvious. However, it can be seen from the simulation re- found in the micro-morphology around the explosion fracture.
sults that there is no obvious damage to the structure where Considering that titanium alloy material itself has high strength,
TNT is not placed. This also indicates that O and P are tensile but it is very sensitive to cracks and defects, which will directly
fractures under centrifugal load in the rotating explosion test. affect its strength.
Fig. 20 shows the microstructure of the fracture at the explo- The fracture morphology of tensile fracture is obviously dif-
sion location of the fan blade. Faults, stratified craters, cracks ferent from that of explosive fracture. In the case of tensile
11
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 37 (8) 2023 DOI 10.1007/s12206-023-0718-9
failure, the fracture of O and P is relatively smooth, and there nancial interests or personal relationships that could have ap-
is no crack and delamination damage. By observing the energy peared to influence the work reported in this paper.
spectrum of the explosion fracture, it can be seen that the ma-
terial composition of the fracture surface has changed obvi-
ously. A large amount of plumbum and oxygen elements can
Nomenclature------------------------------------------------------------------
be captured, which indicates that a strong chemical reaction ρ : Density
happened at the moment of explosion. mj : Mass of particle
Wij : Kernel function
5. Conclusion xij : Particle center position
x : Distance between the particles in space
The complex curved surface structure of the advanced aero- h : Smooth length
engine fan blade was considered in the research of blade re- d : Space dimension
lease method. In this paper, the effectiveness of the explosion V : Velocity
method is verified by simulation, static test and rotating test. It E : Energy
is concluded that: t : Time
1) The numerical simulation results show that the fan blades σ : Stress
are subjected to large impact and oscillation loads in a very P : Pressure
short time. Subsequently, the impact effect in the blade decays E0 : Initial internal energy per unit volume
rapidly and the blade enters the phase of low frequency vibra- V : Initial relative volume
tion stage. In addition, the stress wave pulse oscillates con- σe : Flow stress
tinuously inside the material structure. When the jet stops εep : Equivalent plastic strain
penetrating, the stress wave in the blade continues to propa- ε * : Dimensionless equivalent plastic strain rate
gate along the blade thickness direction. After colliding with the εep : Plastic strain rate
stress wave on the other side at the center of the blade, the ε0 : Reference plastic strain rate
reflected tensile wave formed propagates in opposite directions T* : Dimensionless temperature
and causes the certain tensile effect on the blade. T : Actual temperature of the material
2) From the perspective of energy, the shaped charge cutting T0 : Room temperature,
is essentially a highly transient energy distribution process. Un- σeff : Von mises equivalent stress
der the action of shaped charge jet, the material firstly absorbs Rσ : Stress triaxiality
energy linearly. At this time, the elastic deformation of the blade Γ : Gruneisen coefficient
structure occurs and the energy absorption changes with time ρ0 : Initial density
basically linearly. When the steady-state energy absorption μ : Compression ratio
reaches saturation stage, the time-energy curve shows the ε : Effective plastic strain
maximum point. This is when the jet reaches its maximum β : Hardening constant
penetration depth and then the energy starts to decrease. Fi- n : Hardening exponent
nally, the blade explosion zone continues to separate under the σ P' : Reference states of pressure
action of stress waves. The stress wave energy inside the mate- GT' : Reference states of temperature
rial is rapidly dissipated and the energy is rapidly reduced.
3) The static explosion test results are in good agreement with
the simulation results. The shaped jet explosion can significantly References
reduce the strength of the blade, so that the blade is pulled off [1] N. A. Moussa, M. D. Whale, D. E. Groszmann and X. J. Zhang,
under the 30 % of the blade centrifugal load. Finally, the method The Potential for Fuel Tank Fire and Hydrodynamic Ram from
is successfully applied to the rotary explosion tests, and the Uncontained Aircraft Engine Debris, Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-
separation of the blade is ultimately caused by centrifugal load. 96/95, Federal Aviation Administration, USA (1997).
This method can not only ensure the stable moving attitude of [2] Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Aviation Regulation:
the release blade, but also provide no additional kinetic energy to Part 33-Airworthiness Standards: Aircraft Engines, Federal
the blade. This is very important for the FBO test of aero-engine. Aviation Administration, USA (1984).
[3] CS-E810, Certification Specifications and Acceptable Memis of
Acknowledgments Complimce for Engines: Compressor and Turbine Blade Fail-
ure, European Aviation Safety Agency (2015).
The project was supported by the National Major Science
[4] CCAR-33, Airworthiness Regulations for Aero Engines, Civil
and Technology Projects of China (2017-IV-0006-0043).
Aviation Administration of China, Beijing, China (2005).
[5] G. D. Roberts, D. M. Revilock and W. K. Binienda, Impact test-
Conflict of interest ing and analysis of composites for aircraft engine fan cases,
The authors declare that they have no known competing fi- Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 15 (3) (2002) 104-110.
12
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 37 (8) 2023 DOI 10.1007/s12206-023-0718-9
[6] H. J. Xuan and R. R. Wu, Aeroengine turbine blade contain- tional Journal of Impact Engineering, 36 (2) (2009) 272-282.
ment tests using high-speed rotor spin testing facility, Aero- [23] A. E. Buzyurkin, I. L. Gladky and E. I. Kraus, Determination
space Science and Technology, 10 (6) (2006) 501-508. and verification of Johnson–cook model parameters at high-
[7] Z. He, H. Xuan and C. Bai, A blade release method for FBO speed deformation of titanium alloys, Aerospace Science and
test, Experimental Techniques, 42 (3) (2018) 311-318. Technology, 45 (2015) 121-127.
[8] Y. Bin, Blade containment evaluation of civil aircraft engines, [24] L. Hu, J. Wang, M. Wang, J. Cao and T. Han, Research on
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 26 (1) (2013) 9-16. explosive separation of titanium alloy plates, Chinese Journal
[9] S. Seng, C. Frankenberger, C. R. Ruggeri, D. M. Revilock, J. M. of Vibration and Shock, 38 (13) (2019) 21-25.
Pereira, K. S. Carney and W. C. Emmerling, Dynamic Open- [25] L. L. Ma, H. Wu and Q. Fang, Damage mode and dynamic
rotor Composite Shield Impact Test Report, Technical Memo- response of RC girder bridge under explosions, Engineering
randum, NASA, USA (2015). Structures, 243 (2021) 1-27.
[10] Y. Tan, Z. Huang and Q. Xiao, Theoretical study on hole evo- [26] M. Li, Z. Zong, L. Liu and F. Lou, Experimental and numerical
lution of inclination finite thickness metal plate impacted by study on damage mechanism of CFDST bridge columns sub-
shaped charge jet, International Journal of Impact Engineering, jected to contact explosion, Engineering Structures, 159 (2018)
163 (2022) 1-10. 265-276.
[11] V. M. Fomin, V. I. Zvegintsev and E. Y. Braguntsov, Specific [27] G. R. Johnson and W. H. Cook, A constitutive model and data
features of stretching and breaking of shaped-charge jets, for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high
Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, 61 (2) temperatures. Proceedings of the Seventh International Sym-
(2020) 171-180. posium on Ballistics, Hague, Netherlands (1983).
[12] T. Elshenawy, A. Elbeih and Q. M. Li, Investigation of a new [28] G. R. Johnson and W. H. Cook, Fracture characteristic of three
formula for gurney velocity estimation, Chinese Journal of Ex- metals subjected to various strains, temperature and pressures,
plosives and Propellants, 41 (4) (2019) 340-344. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 21 (1) (1985) 31-48.
[13] S. Jang et al., Experimental and numerical study on jet prop- [29] J.-Y. Chen and F.-S. Lien, Simulations for soil explosion and
erties and penetration of double-layered shaped charge, Jour- its effects on structures using SPH method, International Jour-
nal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 34 (12) (2020) nal of Impact Engineering, 112 (2018) 41-51.
5205-5212. [30] B. Leonid and L. P. Dean, Shear modulus at all pressures:
[14] T. Shi, Y. Jiang and X. Chai, Equivalent test and analysis generalized guinan-steinberg formula, Journal of Physics and
method for explosive releasing of fan blade, Chinses Journal of Chemistry of Solids, 67 (2006) 1930-1936.
Propulsion Technology, 43 (2) (2022) 392-402. [31] C. Bai and H. Xuan, Containment ability and groove depth
[15] K. Zhao, M. Wang, Z. He, Z. Xia, L. Ma and K. Hu, Design of design of U type protection ring, Chinese Journal of Aeronau-
charge structure for explosive separation of carbon fiber com- tics, 29 (2) (2016) 395-402.
posite plates, Chinses Journal of Initiators and Pyrotechnics, 1 [32] C. Xin and Z. Xue, Parameter Manual of Commonly Used
(2021) 15-18. Materials for Finite Element Analysis, Machinery Industry
[16] Z. He and M. Wang, Research on explosive separation of Press of China, China (2019).
carbon fiber composite weave plate, Shock and Vibration, 10
(2021) 1-11.
[17] C. Zhang, N. Jin and G. Li, Study an explosion resistance Zhang Yanan is Postdoctoral Fellow of
process simulatian and blast fracture failure of Ti-6 Al-4V tita- College of Energy Engineering, Zhejiang
nium alloy sheet, Journal of Materials Research and Technol- University, Hangzhou, China. He re-
ogy, 18 (2022) 4724-4737. ceived his Ph.D. from Shenyang Univer-
[18] D. R. Lesuer, Experimental Investigations of Material Models sity of Technology in June 2020. His
for Ti-6A1-4V Titanium and 2024-T3 Aluminum, DOT/FAA/AR- major research areas are structural
00/25, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA (2000). strength failure analysis and health con-
[19] D. Lv, Research on aero-engine fan blade exploding out tech- dition monitoring of aeroengines.
nology, Master's Thesis, Zhejiang University (2017).
[20] M. R. Shiravand and P. Parvanehro, Numerical study on He Zekan is the lecturer of the High-
damage mechanism of post-tensioned concrete box bridges speed Rotating Machinery Laboratory of
under close-in deck explosion, Engineering Failure Analysis, the Institute of Chemical Machinery,
81 (2017) 103-116. Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
[21] Y. Peng, A. Zhang and F. Ming, Numerical simulation of struc- He got his doctor degree June 2018 from
tural damage subjected to the near-field underwater explosion Zhejiang University in the field of high-
based on SPH and RKPM, Ocean Engineering, 222 (2021) 1-15. speed rotating machinery. His major
[22] S. Ma, X. Zhang and X. M. Qiu, Comparison study of MPM research areas are application solid me-
and SPH in modeling hypervelocity impact problems, Interna- chanics and structural strength failure analysis of aeroengine.
13