Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.
1.1 Why do Nations Trade ? What are some of the major argument for and against
a Free Trade ? What are the Consequences (Benefits and Costs) of Free Trade
(Present: at Individual/Firms/Nation)?
Nation Trade because:
Adam Smith detailed the benefits of specialization and division of labor in his book The
Wealth of Nations. Each worker could become an expert in a small area, greatly
increasing efficiency
- Differences in the technology used in each country (i.e., differences in each
country’s ability to manufacture products): The quality of goods and services is likely
to increases as competition encourages innovation, design and the application of new
technologies. Trade will also encourage the transfer of technology between countries.
- Differences in the total amount of resources (including labor, capital, and land) found
in each country :
Division of labour:
+ A division of labour means breaking down production into small, interconnected
tasks, and then allocating these tasks to different workers based on their suitability to
undertake the task efficiently. When applied internationally, a division of labour
means that countries produce just a small range of goods or services, and may
contribute only a small part to finished products sold in global markets.
Capital
Trade increases competition and lowers world prices, which provides benefits to
consumers by raising the purchasing power of their own income, and leads a rise in
consumer surplus
Trade also breaks down domestic monopolies, which face competition from more
efficient foreign firms
- The proximity of countries to each other (i.e., how close they are to one another)
- Specialize in the manufacture and export of products can be produced most
efficiently in that country : The exploitation of a country's comparative advantage,
which means that trade encourages a country to specialise in producing only those
goods and services which it can produce more effectively and efficiently, and at the
lowest opportunity cost.
Producing a narrow range of goods and services for the domestic and export market
means that a country can produce in at higher volumes, which provides further cost
benefits in terms of economies of scale.
- Import products can be produced more efficiently in other countries.
- Trade is also likely to increase employment, given that employment is closely related
to production. Trade means that more will be employed in the export sector and,
through the multiplier process, more jobs will be created across the whole economy.
The major argument for Free Trade
- All countries can benefit if each country specializes in production those goods it
can produce best and satisfy their other wants and needs by trading for
them.This will lead to an optimum and efficient utilization of resources and,
hence, economy in production.
- Free trade can raise aggregate economic efficiency and aggregate economic
welfare.
- Because of unrestricted trade, global output increases since specialization,
efficiency, etc., make production large scale. Free trade enables countries to
obtain goods at a cheaper price. This leads to a rise in the standard of living of
people of the world. Thus, free trade leads to higher production, higher
consumption and higher all-round international prosperity.
- Free trade will benefit a country even if it is less efficient than all other countries
in every industry
- Accessibility of Domestically Produced Goods and Services: Free trade enables
each country to get commodities which it cannot produce at all or can only
produce inefficiently. Commodities and raw materials unavailable domestically
can be procured through free movement even at a low price.
- Free trade would cause world resources to be utilized most efficiently,
maximizing world welfare.
- Import products can be produced more efficiently in other countries
- Competitive Spirit: Free Trade keeps the spirit of competition of the economy.
As there exists the possibility of intense foreign competition under free trade,
domestic producers do not want to lose their grounds. Competition enhances
efficiency. Moreover, it tends to prevent domestic monopolies and free the
consumers from exploitation
- Greater International Cooperation: Free trade safeguards against discrimination.
Under free trade, there- is no scope for cornering raw materials or commodities
by any country. Free trade can thus promote international peace and stability
through economic and political cooperation.
- Free from Interference: Free trade is free from bureaucratic interferences.
Bureaucracy and corruption are very much associated with unrestricted trade.
The major argument Against Free Trade (Protectionism):
- Governments do restrict free international trade in order to protect domestic
industries from foreign competition. The restriction of international trade is
called protectionism.
- Supporters of "protectionist" laws claim that keeping out foreign goods will
+ Save jobs
+ Give ailing domestic industries a chance to recover and prosper
+ Reduce the trade deficits
+ More growth opportunities: Protectionism provides local industries with
growth opportunities until they can compete against more experienced firms in
the international market
+ Lower imports: Protectionist policies help reduce import levels and allow the
country to increase its trade balance.
+ More jobs: Higher employment rates result when domestic firms boost their
workforce
+ Higher GDP: Protectionist policies tend to boost the economy’s GDP due to a
rise in domestic production
+Protectionism can also prevent dumping
+Protectionism makes domestic firms less competitive in the export market
+Protectionism could improve a nations economic well-being is when a country
has monopoly power over a goods.
+Protectionism permits the new and upcoming firms to work and develop at an
aceptable rate. Because they will not be pressured by foreign, more experienced
firms
Benefits of International Trade ( Give more examples)
Individuals
- Consumption of better quality products with lower prices : International trade
enables a country to consume things which either cannot be produced within its
borders or production may cost very high.Therefore it becomes cost cheaper to
import from other countries throgh foreign trade
- Consumption of diverse products : Imports and exports of different countries
provides opportunities to the consumer to buy and consume those goods which
can not be produced in their own country . They therefor get a diversity in choice
Firms
- Greater business opportunities
- Greater profit
Nation
- Fast economic growth
- Job creation
Costs of International Trade
Individuals
- Loss of jbs employed in the less competitive industries
Firms
- Face stronger competition and may lose competitive edge : Increased competition
With more trade, domestic firms will face more competition from abroad.
Therefore, there will be more incentives to cut costs and increase efficiency. It
may prevent domestic monopolies from charging too high prices.
Nation
- Greater income disparity
- Possibility of environmental degradation in developing countries : International
trade help a country to utilize its resources to the maximum limit . If the country
does not takes up import and exports then its resources remain unexplored . Thus
it helps to eliminate thw wastage of resources
- Greater vulnerability to foreign shocks
OR
2. What were the Mercantilists view on Trade ? What are the new contribution of
Mercantilist’s views on Trade ? What is the weak point of Mercantilist’s ? Discuss?
The Mercantilists view on trade:
- Mercantilism is an economic theory that advocates government regulation of
international trade to generate wealth and strengthen national power. Merchants and the
Government work together to reduce the trade deficit and create a surplus. It funds
corporate, military, and national growth. Mercantilism is a form of economic
nationalism.It advocates trade policies that protect domestic industries
- Export surpluses brought inflow of gold and silver.
- Trade policy was to encourage exports and restrict imports.
- One nation gained only at the expense of another.
Mercantilism suggests that it is in a country’s best interest to maintain a trade
surplus – to export more than it imports. To ensure that a country exported a lot
and imported only a little, the Mercantilists were in favor of high tariffs.
Mercantilism advocates government intervention to achieve a surplus in the
balance of trade
The new contribution of Mercantilist’s views on Trade
- To recognize the importance of International Trade.
- Mercantilism suggests that countries | government should design policies that lead to
an increase in their holdings of gold and silver.
- This was usually done by increasing exports and limiting imports. This economic
philosophy was used by Europeans from about the 1500s to the late 1700s.
- To ensure that a country exported a lot and imported only a little, the mercantilists
were in favor of high tariffs. Mercantilism advocates government intervention to
achieve a surplus in the balance of trade
The weak point of Mercantilist’s
- The key problem with the mercantilist view is that it views trade as a zero sum game,
where if one country benefits the other must lose. As an economic philosophy,
Mercantilism is flawed. Mercantilism weakens country in long run; enriches only a
few
- In 1770s, Adam Smith argued that import restrictions would reduce the gains from
specialization and make a nation poorer. He used absolute advantage to explain the
benefits of trade.
- It creates high levels of resentment.
Trickle-down economics works on paper. It just doesn’t work well in real life thanks
to the inherent greed that so many people have. Why give others money when you
can keep it for yourself? The rich tend to get richer in a system of mercantilism and
the working class gets to be stagnant at best. Eventually this creates resentment,
which leads to rebellion, and ultimately it led to many colonies seeking out their own
independence.
- It creates a preference for the mother nation to always be first.
Many colonies are also treated as a foreign nation in a system of mercantilism. This
means the colonies are forced to sell their local raw materials for a bargain basement
price and then be forced to purchase manufactured goods at a higher price than
necessary. This creates an even wider wealth gap between the different income
classes.
- There is always a risk of local raw materials and resources running out.
Because mercantilism is based on the complete use of natural resources, there will
always be a day when those resources run out. Natural resources are finite in nature,
so even if there is an extensive reserve in place that can be accessed, that reserve will
one day run out. If that happens sooner rather than later, then the entire economy can
collapse.
- The system is ultimately quite inefficient.
Because materials and goods are shipped back and forth between colonies and their
mother nation, the price of goods is inflated more than it needs to be. Even with
modern shipping methods, it costs less to manufacture goods locally where raw
resources are available than it does to ship those items back and forth. Because of
this, it also creates vulnerabilities in both economies should those shipments be
intercepted by someone else.
3. How were the Adams Smith (Theory of absolute advantage’s ) views on trade ? How
were gains from trade generated ? What policies did Adam Smith advocate in
International Trade ? What did he think was the proper function of government in the
economic life of the Nation?
Adams Smith (Theory of absolute advantage’s ) views on trade
- "It is the maxim of every prudent master of a family, never to attempt to make at
home what it will cost him more to make than to buy.” (Adam Smith)
- Specialization and trade among regions and countries are based upon the same
principle as among individuals.
- 1776 Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nation
+ Word’s wealth is not a fixed quantity
+ International trade
Increase the general level of productivity within a country
Increase world output (wealth)
- Adam Smith argued that a country has an absolute advantage in the production of a
product when it is more efficient than any other country in producing it
- According to Smith, countries should specialize in the production of goods for which
they have an absolute advantage and then trade these goods for the goods produced
by other countries
Gains from trade generated
- In 1770s, Adam Smith argued that import restrictions would reduce the gains from
specialization and make a nation poorer. He used absolute advantage to explain the
benefits of trade. Adam Smith argued that a country has an absolute advantage in the
production of a product when it is more efficient than any other country in producing
it
- When one nation has absolute advantage in production of a commodity, but an
absolute disadvantage with respect to the other nation in a second commodity, both
nations can gain by specializing in their absolute advantage good and exchanging
part of the output for the commodity of its absolute disadvantage.
Policies Adam Smith advocate in International Trade
- According to Smith, countries should specialize in the production of goods for which
they have an absolute advantage and then trade these goods for the goods produced
by other countries
- Specialization and trade advantage both countries.
- Adam Smith and other classical economists advocated policy of laissez-faire, or
minimal government interference with economic activity.
- Free trade would cause world resources to be utilized most efficiently, maximizing
world welfare.
The function of government in the economic life of the Nation
- As one might expect from Smith’s conviction that markets were extremely efficient,
he was in favor of a government that did not hamper the working of the market
- However, Smith emphasized the fact that the government should
+ Maintain law and order
+ Ensure the defense of the nation from foreign enemies,
+ Erect and maintain public works that private citizens would not build
+ Subsidize education for those who could not afford it, and
+ Regulate international trade when free trade endangers ‘infant industries’ or
compromises national security
4.
4.1 In that way was Ricardo’s law of Comparative Advantage superior to Smith’s
Theory of Absolute Advantage ?( Compare the theory of Absolute Advantage
and Comparative Advantage ?)
4.2 Why this theory is more relevant to the modern trade situation ?
4.3 How do gains from Trade Arise with Comparative Advantage?
4.1 Ricardo’s law of Comparative Advantage superior to Smith’s Theory of
absolute advantage:
A country has an absolute advantage when it produces a large number of goods with the
same resources that other country are using, on the other hand, the comparative
advantage means producing better quality at cheaper price incurring lower opportunity
cost than the other country.
The Smith does not take the limitation of production factor into the account while
Ricardo does. According to Smith, a country would produce all the goods in which they
are better performing. They have low absolute cost after having an absolute advantage;
spend fewer factors in making one unit of product, but it cannot be the manufacturing
center of all goods and services. A country cannot outperform in all types of goods and
secondly, it cannot take an advantage of economies of scale which leads to inefficiency if
a country tries to produce all goods and it may lead to an increase in prices.
Instead, Ricardo focused on the relative cost of production. He emphasized that the
country should produce those goods in which they have comparatively low opportunity
cost than the other countries. A country has to decide what to produce and what to
sacrifice. This gives other countries an opportunity to produce goods efficiently and to
take advantage of economies of scale in which a large number of goods are produced at a
low cost.
Compare the theory of Absolute Advantage and Comparative Advantage:
7.
7.1 What can we say from the Trade pattern between two countries ?
Trade is the exchange of goods and services between countries. Goods bought into a
country are called imports, and those sold to another country are called exports.
Developed countries have a greater share of global trade than developing countries .
Trading globally gives consumers and countries the opportunity to be exposed to
goods and services not available in their own countries, or which would be more
expensive domestically.
The importance of international trade was recognized early on by political
economists like Adam Smith and David Ricardo.
To better understand how modern global trade has evolved, it’s important to
understand how countries traded with one another historically. Over time, economists
have developed theories to explain the mechanisms of global trade. The main
historical theories are called classical and are from the perspective of a country, or
country-based. By the mid-twentieth century, the theories began to shift to explain
trade from a firm, rather than a country, perspective. These theories are referred to as
modern and are firm-based or company-based. Both of these categories, classical and
modern, consist of several international theories.
7.2 What dose Heckscher and Ohlin theory postulate ?
The Heckscher-Ohlin theory argues that trade occurs due to differences in labor,
labor skills, physical capital, capital, or other factors of production across countries.
- Countries have different relative abundance of factors of production.
- Production processes use factors of production with different relative intensity.
They wanted to explain this increase in trade during the “golden age” of international
trade.
- Definition: A nation will export the commodity whose production requires the
intensive use of the nation’s relatively abundant and cheap factor and import the
commodity whose production requires the intensive use of the nation’s relatively
scare and expensive factor.
- Or: the relatively labor-rich nation exports the relatively labor-intensive commodity
and imports the relatively capital -intensive commodity.
Heckscher-Ohlin theorem: An economy has a comparative advantage in producing,
and thus will export, goods that are relatively intensive in using its relatively
abundant factors of production, and will import goods that are relatively intensive in
using its relatively scarce factors of production.
In summary, the capital-abundant country exports the capital-intensive commodity,
and the labor-abundant country exports the labor-intensive commodity.
PART 2 :
8. What is primary function of tariffs in industrial nations ? What are the advantages and
disadvantages of Ad valorem and Specific Tariff ?
Tariffs have three primary functions: to serve as a source of revenue, to protect
domestic industries, and to remedy trade distortions (punitive function).
- The revenue function comes from the fact that the income from tariffs provides
governments with a source of funding. In the past, the revenue function was indeed
one of the major reasons for applying tariffs, but economic development and the
creation of systematic domestic tax codes have reduced its importance in the
developed countries. For example, Japan generates about 90 billion yen in tariff
revenue, but this is only 1.7 percent of total tax revenues (fiscal 1996). In some
developing countries, however, revenue may still be an important tariff function.
- Tariffs is also a policy tool to protect domestic industries by changing the conditions
under which goods compete in such a way that competitive imports are placed at a
disadvantage. In some cases, “tariff quotas” are used to strike a balance between
market access and the protection of domestic industry. Tariff quotas work by
assigning low or no duties to imports up to a certain volume and then higher rates to
any imports that exceed that level.
- Punitive tariffs may be used to remedy trade distortions resulting from measures
adopted by other countries.
The advantages and disadvantages of Ad valorem and Specific Tariff
12. Why do nations subsidize exports? To what problems do these subsidies give rise ?
Analyze few industries that China use the exports subsidize.
What are the major forms of subsidies that governments grant to domestic producers?
A subsidy may provide import-competing producers the same degree of protection as
tariff or quota but at a lower cost in terms of national welfare. It could have long-term
benefits for the economy. Explain.
Nations subsidize exports because:
- Export subsidies are foreign trade policies undertaken by domestic governments
that are intended to "protect" domestic production by restricting
foreign competition. In general, a quota is simply a quantity restriction placed on
a good, service, or activity. For example, employers often face hiring quotas for
different demographic groups and sales representatives often have quotas for
sales activities.
- Domestic Employment: Because foreign imports are produced in other countries
by foreign workers, subsidizing exports and increasing domestic production also
increases domestic employment.
- Low Foreign Wages: Subsidizing the exports of domestic production "levels the
competitive playing field" compared to imports produced by foreign workers
who receive lower wages.
- Infant Industry: If foreign imports compete with a relatively young domestic
industry that is not mature enough nor large enough to benefit from economies of
scale, then export subsidies protect the "infant industry" while it matures and
develops.
- Unfair Trade: Foreign imports might be sold at lower prices in the domestic
economy because foreign producers engage in unfair trade practices, such as
"dumping" imports at prices below production cost. Export subsidies once again
seek to "level the competitive playing field."
- National Security: Export subsidies can also encourage domestic production of
goods that are deemed critical to the security of the national economy.
- The main form of subsidy is a member of party government or any public body
to certain companies for their financial contributions and the right price or
income support, directly or indirectly increase the output of a product from its
territory or reduce the importation of certain products within its territory, or
Members of other damage to the interests of the formation of a government
measure.
- The export subsidy is a government intervention, therefore it has, as all trade
policies, the purpose to modify something in a country's terms of trade, in order
to pursue some specific political objectives. One of the main purposes that can be
found for export subsidies is to encourage national producers. As an example, in
developed countries, an export subsidy is given in order to protect their producers
in the international market from the competition of other countries, poorer
countries, where the cost of factors of production, such as labour or land, is much
cheaper and as a consequence, also the final price of the good will be lower.
Other important purposes could be to support income to the nation, stabilise
prices and equalise balance of payments (the record of a country's transactions
with the rest of the world).
Explain
- A government subsidy granted to import-competing producers leads to increased
domestic production and reduced imports. The subsidy revenue accruing to the
producer is absorbed by producer surplus and high-cost production (protective
effect). A subsidy granted to exporters allows them to sell their products abroad
at prices below their costs. However, it entails a deadweight welfare loss to the
home country in the form of the protective effect and the consumption
effect.Omit the consumer taste
13. Do You agree or don’t agree with Protectionism ? What are the benefits and arguments
against Protectionism ?
Give some examples and trade tools that developed Nations : US, EU, Japan used to
protect their Industry | Agricultural
We agree with Protectionism. Because:
- Trade protectionism is a policy that protects domestic industries from unfair
competition from foreign ones.
- Protectionism is a politically motivated defensive measure. It makes the country
and its industries less competitive in international trade.
- Trade protectionism brings temporary benefits to domestic producers, ensuring
the social goal of securing jobs for certain groups of workers.
- Protection of trade helps redistribute income. The redistribution of social income
is the intervention of the State through the provisions of law, policies to mobilize
and persuade high-income people to contribute to the State to help the
community and low-income people
The benefits of protectionism:
- An advantage of protectionism is that it keeps the domestic economy rolling. Since
there is a decrease in imports, domestic firms have less competition, and so are able
to continue. The domestic economy will also be strengthened because unemployment
will be down due to the domestic firms and they will be able to produce and sell more
goods with a lot less difficulty, giving firms less reason to decrease its costs by
decreasing its workforce. Those with jobs will continue to consume while allowing
the economy to flow.
- Protectionism permits the new and upcoming firms to work and develop at an
acceptable rate, because they will not be pressured by foreign, more experienced
firms. The new firms can grow until they themselves are big enough to compete in
international markets, encouraging positive features for the domestic economy in the
future.
- Protectionism can also prevent dumping, this is where foreign and bigger economies
enter an economy and sell their goods at a price lower than the costs of production.
It can be seen that trade protection offers the following advantages:
- Reduce the competitiveness of imported goods
- Protection of domestic producers; help them to strengthen their strengths in the
domestic market
- Help manufacturers increase their competitiveness to penetrate foreign markets
- Help to regulate the international payment balance of the country, reasonable use of
foreign currency payment of each country.
Arguments Against Protectionism.
- Various arguments are used against protectionism. These include: Inefficiency of
resource allocation in the long run - the imposition of tariffs, or other protectionist
measures, in the long run results in losses of allocative efficiency.
- Protectionism invites a retaliatory response and countries can get locked into trade
war : Risk of Retakiation , Market Distortion , Higher prices for consumers , Regress
effect on income inequality , By-passing import controls , Higher cost for exporters.
The WTO has found it impossible to negotiate a wide ranging global trade agreement
Besides these advantages , the following disadvantage are also mentioned:
- It hurt the process of developing international trade , causing economic isolation in a
globalized world
- Imposing dependency and stagnation in domestic businesses , resulting in stronger
protection , makes the strategic , investment and business industries less flexible .
Investment and business activities are no longer effecttive
- Cause lack of variety in design , style, quality of good , as commodity prices become
more expensive than commercial liberalization , causing damage to consumers.
- Market distortion and loss of Economic Efficiency
- Protectionism can be an ineffective and costly of sustaining jobs and supporting
domestic economic growth
- Higher prices for Consumers
Example: In G-7, Japan and Germany particularly responded strongly to the trend of
trade protectionism. Ahead of the meeting, Japanese Finance Minister Shoichi Nakagawa
announced that Tokyo would resist any manifestation of trade protectionism. He
emphasized that the lesson from the Great Depression in the early 20th century made it
clear that the closure would lead to disaster and at the G-7 Conference, Japan will discuss
measures to prevent this from happening again.
14. What are the technical, administrative, and other non-tariff barriers to trade? How do
they restrict trade? What is the importance of these non-tariff barriers relative to tariff
barriers? Give some examples that countries used in Trading Practice?
Non-tariff barries
- Non-tariff barriers to trade (NTBs) or sometimes called "Non-Tariff Measures
(NTMs)" are trade barriers that restrict imports or exports of goods or services
through mechanisms other than the simple imposition of tariffs. The SADC says, "a
Non-Tariff Barrier is any obstacle to international trade that is not an import or
export duty. They may take the form of import quotas, subsidies, customs delays,
technical barriers, or other systems preventing or impeding trade." According to the
World Trade Organisation, non-tariff barriers to trade include import licensing, rules
for valuation of goods at customs, pre-shipment inspections, rules of origin ('made
in'), and trade prepared investment measures.
- There are several different variants of division of non-tariff barriers. Some scholars
divide between internal taxes, administrative barriers, health and sanitary regulations
and government procurement policies. Others divide non-tariff barriers into more
categories such as specific limitations on trade, customs and administrative entry
procedures, standards, government participation in trade, charges on import, and
other categories.
- Standards take a special place among non-tariff barriers. Countries usually impose
standards on classification, labeling and testing of products in order to be able to sell
domestic products, but also to block sales of products of foreign manufacture. These
standards are sometimes entered under the pretext of protecting the safety and health
of local populations.
Challenges of Globalization
- Job Mobility
One of the most common critiques of the global trade system is how it ships jobs,
especially manufacturing jobs, from less developed countries to developing countries.
Lower-skilled workers who lose manufacturing jobs in developed countries often
have a difficult time finding new, comparably compensated work.
- Western Dominance
Despite huge growth in emerging markets, the Western developed world still holds
the reigns on international order and on how capital flows from country to country
- Loss of Cultural Identity
While globalization has made foreign cultures easier to access, it has also begun to
meld cultures together. The success of certain cultures throughout the world have
caused other countries to emulate these lifestyles and culture
16. What is the globalization? Describe the benefits and challenges of current wave of
Globalization for Vietnam’s economy
Globalization is the connection of different parts of the world resulting in the expansion
of international cultural, economic, and political activities. It is the movement and
integration of goods and people among different countries. There are advantages and
disadvantages to globalization, all of which have economic, social, political, and cultural
impacts.globalization describes mainly trade practices, extending also to the
communication patterns and cultural system that underlie these practices.
Benefits of current wave of Globalization for Vietnam’s economy
- Increasing export revenues
As a result of integrating into the regional and global market, export revenues have
increased continually since 1990, speeded up sine 1995 when Vietnam joined
ASEAN and grew sharply since Vietnam joined WTO in 2007.
- Rapid increase in foreign direct investment (FDI)
As a WTO member, Vietnam has become an attractive destination for foreign
investors. Registered FDI surged to US$71 billion in 2008, compared with only $12
billion in 2006. During the three years of WTO membership, total registered FDI into
Vietnam reached more than $114 billion, 4.5 times higher than the target set for the
2006-2010 period. Of this, $29.5 billion was disbursed in the five years
- Increase in enterprises’ awareness, adaptation and performance
Joining WTO means that Vietnam has entered a large “play ground” where
Vietnamese enterprises have to compete with many giant players-big foreign
corporations with strong financial power and experience. This is also a chance for
state-owned enterprises pending on the Government protection and subsidies
restructure their operation. Otherwise they will be defeated even in the domestic
market. So under the competition pressure, the Vietnam’s enterprises will become
more effective and competitive.
- More favorable legal system for trading activities
Global economic integration and accession to the WTO have given Vietnam a chance
to refine its policy and legal system to be more transparent, sustainable and
predictable to be in line with WTO regulations and to attract more foreign investors.
Moreover, as a WTO member, Vietnam is treated as a full WTO membership.
Vietnamese enterprises have a healthy environment for development in foreign
markets. If there are trade disputes, they can be treated under WTO’s Dispute
Settlement Mechanism.
Challenges of current wave of Globalization for Vietnam’s economy
- Low competitiveness of nation, enterprises and products
Vietnamese enterprises are mainly medium and small-sized. None of Vietnam’s
state-owned enterprises was on the list of 1000 world biggest corporations, neither its
commercial trademarks in the list of 1000 most prestigious global trademarks. If we
want to gain strong competitiveness in international market, we must have many
strong enterprises like Sony, Toyota of Japan, or Hyundai, Samsung of South Korea
- Issues relating to macro policies and administrative procedure
A widening trade deficit, an overheating economy, and a global rise in commodity
prices caused inflation to shoot up to 23 percent in 2008.This in turn triggered a crisis
of confidence, big swings in interest rates, and a sharp fall of the dong, the local
currency”. Although this issue was over and the government has performed better
when dealing with the global financial crisis, it is an important lesson that because
the Vietnamese economy has integrated deeply into the global economy, the
exchange rates, inflation, balance of payment and budget deficit will develop
unpredictably.
- Difficulties in agricultural sector
Agriculture [1] is the main sector in the economy, accounting for 20 percent of GDP
and 66 percent of the national population. However, it is confronting with vigorous
competition in the global market. Farmers lack knowledge and professional skills.
Production technology is small and backward, which increases the production costs
compared to those of other countries and makes the quality of the products low.
Agricultural enterprises are often of small size and disperse. As a result, they have
weak financial capacity to improve production technology and labor productivity.
17. What are the benefits and challenges of ASEAN Economic Community ?
Describe the opportunities and economic benefits of Vietnam in the AEC ?
Why Vietnam actively participates in many FTAs ?
What are the benefits and costs of Vietnam when we sign FTAs and joint WTO ?
What are the challenges for Vietnam in this period: Trade tension between US- China ?
❖ Later, as trade grew, payment was made in paper currency which was linked to gold at a fixed rate
standard
❖ In the 1880s, most of the world’s trading nations followed the gold standard
❖ Under the gold standard one U.S. dollar was defined as equivalent to 23.22 grains of
❖ The amount of a currency needed to purchase one ounce of gold was called the gold
par value
The great strength of the gold standard was that it contained a powerful mechanism for achieving
balance-of-trade equilibrium (when the income a country’s residents earn from its exports is equal to the
money its residents pay for imports) by all countries
B/ Gold exchange standard (1918-1939)
❖ The gold standard worked fairly well from the 1870s until the start of World War I in
1914
❖ During the war, many governments financed their war expenditures by printing money, and in doing
so, created inflation
❖ People lost confidence in the system and started to demand gold for their currency putting pressure on
countries' gold reserves, and forcing them to suspend gold convertibility
❖ all currencies were fixed to gold, but only the U.S. dollar was directly convertible to
gold
❖ devaluations could not to be used for competitive purposes
❖ a country could not devalue its currency by more than 10% without IMF approval
❖ the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to maintain order in the international monetary system
❖ It collapsed when huge increases in welfare programs and the Vietnam War were
❖ Other countries increased the value of their currencies relative to the dollar in response to speculation
the dollar would be devalued
❖ However, because the system relied on an economically well managed U.S., when the U.S. began to
print money, run high trade deficits, and experience high inflation, the system was strained to the
breaking point
• The US dollar was the only currency that could be converted into gold
• The US dollar served as the reference point for all other currencies
• Any pressure to devalue the dollar would cause problems through out the world
After the collapse of the Smithsonian Agreement, the major currencies of North America, Europe and
Japan floated. During the 1970s, the dollar depreciated as inflation bit and then commenced its dramatic
ascent following the 1979-80 Volcker Shock when US interest rates were hiked to unprecedented levels.
By 1985, the dollar’s strength was harming US competitiveness, prompting the US, Japan, Germany,
France to sign the Plaza Accord, under which they jointly intervened to lower the dollar. Their
intervention was so effective that they had to sign another agreement in 1987 - the Louvre Accord - to
stop the further fall of the dollar. Prior to these meetings, free floating exchange rates were considered the
best but thereafter, the major countries began to cooperate more.
The international monetary system can be divided according to the regime of exchange rates or
the way of determining international reserve assets. According to the exchange rate regime, there
is an international monetary system according to the fixed exchange rate regime and the floating
exchange rate regime.
Classification according to the method of determining the international reserve assets, we have a
monetary system according to the gold standard system (gold is the only international reserve
asset), the monetary system follows the indigenous regime of a currency. country (for example,
the US dollar).