Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Proxy Wars
Proxy Wars
What is meant by the term “Proxy War”? Are there any extrinsic factors at play in the internal security situation of Pakistan?(2020)
A proxy war is an armed conflict between two states or non-state actors which act on the instigation(ishtiaal angaizi,
agwa,bhrakna,uksana) or on behalf of other parties that are not directly involved in the hostilities(dushmani)
Or
Proxy warfare is best defined as the direct or indirect sponsorship of third-party conventional or irregular forces that lie outside of the
constitutional order of states engaged in armed conflict.
Examples
War Dates Combatant 1 Combatant 2 Result
Internal conflict in 1948–present Myanmar Opposition forces Ongoing
Myanmar
Burma (until 1989) ABSDF All Burma Students'
Tatmadaw Democratic Front
Myanmar Police Arakan Army
Force DKBA-5Democratic Karen
Supported by: Buddhist Army - Brigade 5
India knukaren National Union
China[280]
Israel[281] (formerly)[282] knlakaren National
Russia[283] Liberation Army
Philippines kiokachin Independence
Ukraine Organisation
North Korea
Yugoslavia (until 1988) Kiakachin Independence
Army
mndaamyanmar National
Democratic Alliance Army
ssanshan State Army-North
ssasshan State Army - South
tnlata'ang National Liberation
Army
uwspunited Wa State Party
Sectarian groups
Jundallah
Jaish ul-Adl
Jundallah (Pakistan)
al-Qaeda
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi
Sipah-e-Sahaba
plopalestine
Liberation Supported by:
Organization United States
United Kingdom
Hamas
France
Fatah Germany
Canada
Supported by: Australia
Egypt (1948–78) Egypt (since 1978)[
Iraq
Syria
Italy (1956)
Germany (1956)
Cuba
Algeria
Bangladesh
Soviet Union
Lebanon
Supported by:
Soviet Union
China
asalaarmenian Secret
Army for the Liberation of
Armenia (ASALA) (1970s
–1988)
Syria
Greece
Cyprus
Iran
Iraq
Libya
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Yemeni Crisis (part of Iran- 2011–present Yemen (Hadi Yemen (Supreme Political Ongoing
Saudi Arabia proxy government) Council)
conflicts) Saudi-led coalition Supported by:
Supported by:
Iran
Iraq
Somalia
North Korea
United States
Russia
Eritrea
Syria
United Kingdom
France
Pakistan
Canada[389]
Italy[
Turkey
Other militias:
Lebanese Communist
Party
Fatah
First Libyan Civil War 2011-2011 Anti-Gaddafi forces Libya Combatant 1 Won
Supported by:
Iran
IRP Islamic
Renaissance Party of Supported by:
Tajikistan Russia
Uzbekistan
Democratic reformists
Kyrgyzstan
Gorno-Badakhshan
Jamiat-e Islami
Islamic State of
Afghanistan
Taliban factions2
Supported by:
al-Qaeda
Islamic Renaissance
Party of Tajikistan (IRP)
Pakistan
Iran
Sri Lankan Civil War 1983–2009 Liberation Tigers of Sri Lanka Combatant 2 Won
Tamil Eelam Maldives
India
Supported by:
Libya Supported by:
India (until 1987) Pakistan
Supported by:
Pakistan
United States
United Kingdom
China
Saudi Arabia
West Germany
United Kingdom
Turkey
Egypt
France
Israel
Japan
Shia Mujahedeen:
Harakat i-Islami
Afghan Hezbollah
Nasr Party (IVOA)
Coirgacorpus of Islamic
Revolution Guardians of
Afghanistan
Shura Party
Irmislamic Revolution
Movement
UOIF
Raad Party
Supported by:
Iran
aloafghanistan
Liberation
Organization
Samaazman-e
Azadibakhsh-e
Mardom-e Afghanistan,
Amfffafghanistan
Mujahedin Freedom
Fighters Front
Supported by:
Sri Lanka
United Arab Emirates
Jordan
Malaysia
Supported by:
China
Soviet Union
South Yemen
East Germany
Supported by:
Albania
Bulgaria[
Yugoslavia
1945–1946 Azerbaijan People's Imperial State of Iran Combatant 2 Won
Iran crisis of 1946 Republic
Republic of Mahabad Supported by:
Supported by: United States
Soviet Union
The regional power struggle between Shias and Sunnis is evident throughout the Middle East and North Africa. This conflict dates back more
than a thousand years and stems from religious differences between the two sects. Like in the past, Shia and Sunni leadership are currently
using these differences to increase their spheres of power, prestige and influence. These divisions have aggravated(barhana) already existing
tensions in the Islamic world with Shia Iran supporting Shia groups – and Sunni nations, such as Saudi Arabia supporting Sunni groups. These
endeavors(koshishein) are based on opposing strategic interests. As such, sectarian conflict will continue to shape the region into the
foreseeable future. This is evident by examining proxy conflicts throughout the region, such as in Iraq, Syria and Yemen. The political framework
that will eventually emerge will have profound(gehra) strategic consequences for the region and beyond.
Background
The split of the Muslim community into two denominations occurred soon after the death of Prophet Mohammad in 632 CE. The individual that
would succeed him would serve as both a religious and political leader of the Muslim world. Sunnis asserted (zor dena)that the successor(baad
mey aaney wala, jaanasheen) should be appointed and the Shia argued that succession(jaanasheeni, silsila) should be based on
lineage(nasab). The split occurred when Abu Bakr, Prophet Mohammad’s father in law and close friend was appointed as the next leader of the
Muslim world. The Shia (the party of Ali) did not accept Abu Bakr’s succession. They believed that Ali should have succeeded Prophet
Mohammad, as Ali was his cousin, son-in-law and close friend. They further believed that Prophet Mohammad explicitly named him as his
successor.
This core disagreement between the two sects has served as the premise(bunyaad) for conflict between the two factions (groh)and “continues to
shape the history of the Islamic world and the broader Middle East”. Like today, the schism(firqa waariyat) was as much about religious
leadership, as it was about power and influence. Currently, the schism is being used to fan the flames of animosity(adawat) and distrust(adam
aitmaad) that has existed between Shias and Sunnis since 632. More specifically, leaders are still using sectarianism as a tool to strengthen their
own legitimacy(qanooni haisiyat), power and influence. Similarly to the supporters of Abu Bakr and Ali, modern religious leaders are also fighting
for the leadership of and hegemony over the Muslim world and the region. This includes Iraq, Syria and Yemen where sectarian conflict has
reached destructive levels and has created a humanitarian(insaan dost) crisis.
Proxy Battlegrounds
The Middle East is in the midst(darmiyan) of a regional power struggle between Iranian allied Shias and Saudi allied Sunnis. These key players
are primarily motivated by politics and competition for influence and power. As such, Saudi Arabia and Iran are taking advantage of instability in
the region and are using religion and ancient grievances(shikayat) as instruments of policy. This has translated into a wide scale proxy conflict
that has destabilized the region.
Saudi Arabia fears Iran’s quest(talash, justuju) for regional hegemony(tasallut, baladasti) and sees its growing influence as an alarming shift in
regional balance. As such, undermining(majroh kerna) Iran and its allies, such as Iraq and Syria, and ideally reversing Iran’s gains motivate
Saudi Arabia. On the other hand, Iran is using the changing geopolitical landscape to enhance its influence and to become the dominant regional
power. To achieve their goals these powers frame geopolitical contests within a religious framework and play up sectarian tensions. Thus,
resulting in the conversion of the Middle East into their battleground without ever directly confronting each other. Moreover, their proxy war has
exacerbated(barh gaya) the volatile situation in the region, including in Syria, Iraq and Yemen. In Syria alone, as of August 2015, “almost a
quarter of a million people, including nearly 12,000 children, have been killed…since [war] broke out in March 2011…” and millions have been
displaced. Additionally, in Iraq there have been approximately 163,521 civilian deaths and in Yemen more than 1,670 civilians were killed in
the violence since March 26, 2015.
Conclusion
The magnitude(shiddat) of conflict in the region and the role of external players on its continuation(tasalsul) will have profound(gehra) strategic
consequences far into the future. As such, it is important to have a firm grasp(mazboot giraft) of the role that religion and sectarianism play
as mobilizing forces in regional politics. Moreover, by understanding the complexities associated with the Sunni-Shia conflict and how conflict
within Islam may come to shape regional relations with the outside world, the West will be better able to protect its interests and security.