Professional Documents
Culture Documents
[Nicole Coalla]
[February 9, 2024]
The interviewer conducted an at-home usability test using the participants personal
iPad. Another voluntary observer was in the room assisting with notes and timing the
tasks given to the participant. The session recorded and consisted of the participant’s
comments, task completion times, navigation choices, satisfaction ratings, and
feedback.
Executive Summary
The Interviewer conducted an at home usability test at the home of the interviewer
in Alpharetta, Georgia on February 9th, 2024. The purpose of the test conducted was
to assess the usability of the Levi’s website in terms of organization, navigation, and
ease of completing the activities needed.
Following this document shows the participant’s feedback, test completion rates,
time on task, satisfaction ratings, usage rating, and overall thoughts on the website.
Methodology
Sessions
The interviewer asked the participant to do a face-to-face interview over text
message. The interviewer asked for participation. The participant than proceeded to
tell the interviewer the date and time of when she was available for the session. The
After the main tasks were completed, the interviewer asked the participant several
scaled questions on a scale 5-point Likert scale of 1-5, with measures describing 1=
no problem and 5 = major problem. Some of the post task scenarios included:
The interviewer also provided questions that measured the satisfaction of the
participant on a 5-point Likert scale with measures ranging from 1= extremely
dissatisfied and 5= extremely satisfied. Included is:
At the end, the interviewer asked the participant the following overall questions:
Participants
The participant is a recent graduate from the University of North Georgia following
her post grad education at the University of St. Augustine. The participant was
scheduled for February 9th and was able to complete the test on the same day. The
participant is a female.
Role
Graduate
Student
Evaluation Tasks/Scenarios
The test participant tackled the following tasks that were created by the interviewer:
o (You’re trying to find this specific pair of jeans that your little sister
has asked for her birthday. You don’t know the name, but you know
what they look like. Go through the process of finding these specific
jeans. Please stop once you click on their image.)
o (You were talking to your dad who served in the military for several
years and found out recently than Levi’s does a discount for nonactive
soldiers. Go through the process of picking out an item and applying
the discount code. Stop when you find the code.)
Results
Task Completion Success Rate
The participant successfully completed Task 1 (find the specific pair of jeans) and Task 2 (find
the military discount code) without guidance. Complete rates are calculated at 100% for both
tasks.
Task Completion Rates
1 √ √
Success 1 1
Completion
100% 100%
Rates
Task Ratings
After the completion of each task, participants rated the ease or difficult of
completing the task for three factors:
- Using the pages and features easily
- Distinguish between men and woman products
- Information was placed easily to find
The 5-point rating scale ranged from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree).
Agree ratings are the agree and strongly agree ratings combined with a mean
agreement rating of > 4 considered as the user agrees that the information was easy
to find, that they can find the specific jeans and they can locate and apply the
military discount.
The participant agreed that it was easy to find the military discount code and apply it
to their item with a mean agreement rating of 5. At the same time, the participant
found it more difficult to find a specific pair of pants when not knowing the name of
the pants with the mean agreement rating of 2.
The participant found it relatively easy to navigate through the website. However, she found it
more difficult to differentiate between products and clicking through to find the right one with a
means agreement of 3. She found it very easy to use the military discount feature on her items
and locating it with a mean agreement rating of 4.
The participant agreed it was relatively easy to predict where things would be located
on the website. She stated that information could be found easily without any
hiccups. She rated this with a mean agreement of 5. The participant found it more
difficult to predict where her specific pants would be since they all look very similar
to each other. She rated this with a mean agreement of 2.
Time on Task
The interviewer proceeded to time the tasks that were presented to the participant.
One task was more tedious than the other, and that is reflected by the average tot.
Task 1 asked the participant to find a specific pair of jeans without knowing the
name of the jeans. This took her a total of 3 minutes to complete. Task 2 asked the
participant to find and apply the military discount code to her item and it took her a
total of 1 minute to complete. The completion times ranged from 60 seconds to 90
seconds.
For example:
Time on Task
P1 Avg. TOT*
Task 1 3 3
Task 2 1 1
Overall Metrics
Overall Ratings
After task session completion, the participants rated the site for seven overall
measures, such as:
o Easy to use
o Difficulty finding specific item
Thought Website
1 4 100%
was easy to use
Found it difficult to
1 5 100%
find specific item
Found it difficult to
find the size of 1 3 0
specific item
Found it difficult to
navigate the 1 3 0
website’s features
Is satisfied with
the organization of 1 2 0
the website
Is satisfied with
the website’s 1 1 0
appearance
Is satisfied with
how easy it was to
1 3 0
find the military
discount
*Percent Agree (%) = Agree & Strongly Agree Responses combined
Liked Most
The following comments capture what the participants liked most:
The participant showed a liking to the pages and the easiness of the website. “It was
crowded, but I was about to find the women’s, men’s, kids, and sale sections easily.”
She stated how she enjoyed the subpages found on the home page when you hover
over the gender specified pages. “It gave me a lot of options to look through.”
Liked Least
The following comments capture what the participants liked the least:
The participant found that she disliked how crowded the home page was. She stated
that there wasn’t just one thing that she could focus on and said that it was
overwhelming to look through. She wasn’t too happy about how many options of the
same type of jean there were. She stated that it was too confusing and created more
stress than peace when it came it finding her jeans.
Recommendations
The recommendations section provides recommended changes and justifications
driven by the participant success rate, behaviors, and comments. Each
recommendation includes a severity rating. The following recommendations will
improve the overall ease of use and address the areas where participants
experienced problems or found the interface/information architecture unclear.
Categorize jeans by style not The participant shows strong recommendation to High
by color change the homepage to be less distracting, and
her ratings show that. On top of that, she
Make the military discount expressed how unfortunate it was to have to
clearer in the home page. scroll all the way to the bottom to find the
Simplify the home page so military discount, when it shouldn’t be treated High
that it is less distracting and like it’s an unnecessary thing.
crowded. While the organization received a neutral rating,
she expressed her concern for the categorizing of
the jeans and how unorganized it was. That
made it harder for her to find the specific jean
that she was looking for. This was her biggest
concern as a consumer of Levi’s and recommends
this change urgently.
Conclusion
Implementing the recommendations and continuing to work with users (i.e., real lay
persons) will ensure a continued user-centered website.