{Forensic Accounting v Forensic Accounting a5 accounting , auditing,investigative skill qp20) 30053(4)($: company §, financial statement 0300620: [3&:(gSo0p5 v Forensic Accounting 4, qpogudajoda0 95 O26P= 43 3096 0053(G14$ [gooopon v Forensic Accounting 06 Forensic Audit $¢ Forensic investigation o3dloéaopon {)) Forensic Investigation Forensic investigation 2099 or6p:8[9Ez sc sa[GCzqoz9 ’ (legal proceding / settle dispute) oR0RE 39053(G194§ Forensic Accountant 9 Evidence peanne: 29 § [give o ae cpdc§:0p saa0Es0€ :(gSo095u Geo) o3C Planning, Evidence gathering, quality control review SC resultapo report op 05 602[§6203 (goo0 p51 6{) Forensic Audit F 6 ¢ aes | | Forensic Audit 299 Forensic investigation Gi G fs “¢: . C0UE§0Y3202C:4) specific audit procedure ° ‘e feces aps09:{GI[G: ege[oga:qzg oeocw ( quantation of financia loss) 07 320020002 c Gober esa, ce . ooeso:[9ce{G: finding 4p:s¢ Evidence @a00C:(9C209[gdaop5u 8 sO? P {Matter to be considered before acceptance ° c : : ° ° Gjcpe0026929 skill & experience §] /) Forensic investigation 2929 special Cc Cc fe} . eae nature [gea006(o96 Fraud 1200620203 66 ie ° c. ° ° $¢ Legal framwork 4p: 306[07pC: 03/ #95 EjAudit client 9 forensic investigation c c c : ° ° 3a0jU3a0QQC Ethical threat 9/°9) e.g self review threat, advocat threat Fi Gar ri a GJ Investigator 2979 interview $¢ 4 9g 4 ° ¢ ei interrogation technique 9232020) Training oc cae ° ODSC Ce 9/99)@ Experience s¢ Senior audit staff 4p20> sa0p2[G)qep [goeorre [oF high audit fee euz8C Ce 9/25) L J i {Planning the investigation : ‘7 ie Investigation Team soeg(gE 339602 GG s 2 . 6329 0068024000 ( Objective of a ‘ a 3° o 9° ca ° investigation) 290092@00380090) plan ONG ( () _() GS JI c BIOPC? OOC SOO CYSBUO!OIUDII "i a x a a i Investigation §, objective saes{gc ° Vv fraud 32q)|?32003 . < < eee fraud |Gd6sox9 SDUD600DND 0 v ig ° co Oo) Gi losplG v fraud Op POA? 090939202900 v fraud 90020) sa[gp:onwo8esx06 220908 b3a905000303 LoL fo} c c a v fraud goleevreieng 990099602 oloéad V fraud e[opfap:42099;03 regefagtuenan Vv «ps 54 Hap) soohilgis evidence gea0eG v fraud 602 cobsloovsal wfgdecaoé ©7790QUSGsx0}A5 3 [03[Gjajoe02 (godlooudu oO{) Geathering evidence . Ge s : c Investigator 2 audit evidence 96s00C: Cc ODC v 2 e Cc is | ee = V fraud “AIeegFePoge Ylocopaps Vv fraud 9 O[20Q§29A200 Eun onyoRe Gago} a Vv egelozrads gee a Se : sufficient [goesaoc PESOICzq\O PIIIG\g}C0D . . ¢ ° c 6952 evidence ple er ceca 1 oc 290560930[Go ooc{gsc gepou ald gx ooc[ge 69DqgP 5 §209830003 squ poll {) Reporting Reporting saes(gC Finding 4p: 309 sa0y|p2 qybeo: [9c [geoo een 32008 o0(gé ege[aqiad: ilaeienee $C Cee 332020) evidence opoloc a9 p01 8 {gé internal control 322 sg p08 ‘fac: elope fraud 4ps s[godogic cobsloobsal a(go a 6300€ internal control canes 2OgSO 99 (039) |ajmaps copd: Jlocoop5u{court proceeding Cees 9e9[gC: ca case 4p: 2320209 investigation woos ieee evidence 4pé 209 06p24)308 rE[Yqep5i1 Orgp243 © GOIDE209 cy cece wad (Gqep5u 08 § C:[Gecooeal non - accountant ape zdloé : =e goeog: 8600) accounting | issue * Uoogg Frecopdeogs Gesleqcsqes orc[GSe e099 p01 2 GO oe i