UNIVERSITY CASEBOOK SERIES®
ANTITRUST LAW AND
TRADE REGULATION
CASES AND MATERIALS
SEVENTH EDITION
A. Dou@Las MELAMED
Professor of the Practice of Law,
Stanford Law School
Ranpat C. PICKER
‘James Parkor Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law,
University of Chicago Lav School
PHILIP J. WEISER
Hattield Professor of Law and Telecommunications,
Dean Bmeritus, and Bxective Director of the
Silicon Flatiron Center for Law, Technology,
tnd Entrepreneurship
University of Colorado Law Schoo!
DIANE P. Woop
Chief Cireuit Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit
Senior Lecturer in Law,
University of Chicago Law Schoo!
FOUNDATION
PRESSCHAPTER 2
MARKET POWER AND THE
MEANING OF COMPETITION
1. Market Power
2, The Limits of Permissible Competition
8, The Challongos of Applying the Antitrust Law (and the Concept of
Market Power)
1. MARKET POWER
A. MARKET POWER: DEFINITION AND SIGNIFICANCE
‘Market power is one of the most basic notions in antitrust, but that
does not mean that it is well understood or that itis easy to convey what
is at stake, The most natural path, we think, and the one that we will
follow, is to start with the absence of market power—a competitive
situation—and with that as the baseline, build up @ notion of mariet
power as a deviation from competitive conditions.
1. AN INPRODUCTION To THE ECONOMICS OF COMPETITION AND
‘MONOPOLY
‘The most basic tool in antitrust economics is the demand curve,
Demand curves can be either for a particular individual or for a group of
individuals or for even the economy as a whole. A demand curve
represents the willingness of the covered individuals to pay for the good
in question, And the most basic property of demand curves is that
consumers want more of the good as it becomes less expensive,
Consumers will buy more cases of Diet Coke at $3.99 than they will at
$4.25, That is true both because some individual consumers will buy
more Diet Coke at a lower price and because some consumers will not
buy any Diet Coke at the higher price. Put differently, demand curves
slope down, When economists say that—and they do say that with some
frequency—they have in mind the idea of a graph with price on the Y-
axis and quantity on the X-axis. High prices imply low quantities, and
low prices imply high quantities. Demand curves slope down. This is
illustrated by Figure 2.1.
1o Manion Power AND THE MEANING OF ComPurrrioN Cuarren 2
$2___Manuer Powen aun Tu Mean or Cowrermon ____—Ciarren
Demand Curve
10
In Figure 2.1, the vertical axis, labeled P, shows the unit price for
the product at issue, in this ease Diet Coke. ‘The horizontal axis, labeled
Q, shows the number of units of the product. The demand eurve, which
is typically labeled D, shows the number of units that consumers are
willing to buy at each price. Ifthe price is 10, eonsumers are not willing
to buy any units, They are willing to buy some number of units (1 unit in
Figure 2.1) ifthe price is 9, a larger number (2 in Figure 2.1) if the price
is 8, and 60 on, Another way of putting the point is that the demand curve
depicted in Figure 2.1 shows that consumers are willing to pay up to 9,
but no more, for the first unit of Diet Coke, up to 8 for the second unit,
tand so on. As we will see, however, the actual price that consumers will,
have to pay might be less than those shown on the demand curve.
a. Competitive Markets
Demand curves are important because they help frame how to think
about competitive markets. In a competitive market, goods are produced
80 long as consumers are willing to pay for those goods amounts that
‘excoed the cost af creating those goods. There is quite a bit embedded in
‘that statement. This is not an abstract statement about how much a
given consumer might enjoy consuming a particular good. Instead, it
focuses on the willingness of a consumer to pay for a good and, in doing
0, it focuses on the ability of that consumer to pay for the good. When
wwe think ahout competitive markets, we take demand curves as a given
and then assess how goods are produced relative to that demand eurve.
‘The stylized version of a competitive market assumes that producers
are each relatively small and each believes that it is a price-taker. That
means that each believes that the final price for the good is set by the
“market” and that its production is too small to influence that price. That
‘makes decision-making for the firm quite simple, If the current market
price excoeds its marginal cost—that is, the cost of making the next unit
of the good—the firm should make move units of the good. Put numberssscri0Nt Manes Powsn
on that. If the current market price ig $6 and the firm can make
additional units for $4, it will make a profit of $2 on the next uni: that it
eroates. And it should do that as fast as it can and make as many as
possible.
Of course, each firm is in the same position, and the only way for all,
of them in the aggregate to sell more of the good in question than the
amount they could sell at a price of $6 is for priee to go down. Why?
Demand eurves slope down. Consumers will take more of the good only if
the price goes down. That should start to make clear the dynamics of
‘competition at work here and the natural result of that outcome. In a
competitive market, if all of the firms that can make units for $4 keep
making units as long as the price excaeds $4, the price will decline until
it equals $4. Now, let's flip the facts and consider the opposing situation,
If the current market price of the good is $2 and it costs $4 to produce
each unit of the good, the firm should cut production because at the
current price it would lose $2 per unit. As each firm cuts production,
overall output will drop; and again, because demand curves slope down,
the market price of the good will rise as production drops until the price
equals marginal cost. Thus, in a competitive market, price equals
marginal cost. This is illustrated by Figure 2.2.
Stop to consider the beauty of what just took place. Producers
produce goods as long as consumers are willing to pay for them, No
consumer who is willing to pay more than it costs to create the next unit,
of the good is left unsatisfied. And no producer makes a good that isn't
‘covered by what a consumer is willing to pay for it. It costs one producer
more to make the good than it costs another producer, only the low cost.
Producer will keep producing the good and selling it at the low price. A
‘competitive economy is said to be economically efficient in that () enough
‘output is produced to satisfy all the demand of eonsumera who value the
product in excess of its cost of production (“allocative efficiency”) and Gi)
output is produced at minimum cost (“productive efficiency’)
Let's take a closer look at Figure 2.2. The point of an example like
the one set out in Figure 2.1 is to remove much of the complexity of the
real world to allow the core points to stand out. The idea that damand
‘curves slope down is captured in a simple equation P = 10-Q. Just put
4 few numbers in that to see what happens. At a price of 2—