Problem 1. Consider a two-asset model with prices given by
(P 1 , P 2 ) (3, 9) w; ww 1/4 w ww ww (4, 6) / (6, 8) GG 1/4 GG GG 1/2 GG# (6, 4) Is there arbitrage in this market? If not, find all martingale deflators. Problem 2. Consider the one-asset model with price process Pt = 1{t<τ } where τ is a random variable taking values in {1, 2, . . .}. (a) Suppose that there is a non-random time T > 0 such that τ ≤ T almost surely. Show that there is an arbitrage. (b) Suppose P(τ = k) = (1 − p)k−1 p for a constant 0 < p < 1, so τ has the geometric distribution. Show that there is no arbitrage. Can you find a martingale deflator? Problem 3. Consider a three-asset model with asset 1 cash so that P01 = P11 = 1 and assets 2 and 3 given by (P 2 , P 3 ) (9, 8) ; ww ww 1/3 ww ww (6, 7) GG GG GG 2/3 GG# (3, 5) Is there arbitrage in this market? If not, find all equivalent martingale measures with respect to the cash numéraire. Problem 4. Let (Ω, F, P) be a probability space, and let W be a random vector with the d-dimensional normal Nd (0, I) distribution, where I is the d × d identity matrix. Fix a constant vector α ∈ Rd and define an equivalent measure Q on (Ω, F) by the density dQ 2 = eα·W −|α| /2 . dP Prove that the random variable Ŵ = W − α has the Nd (0, I) distribution under Q. Problem 5. Consider a d+1 asset model P = (1, S), where the first asset is cash while assets 2, . . . , d + 1 have time-0 price S0 ∈ Rd and time-1 prices S1 with the Nd (µ, V ) distribution, where µ ∈ Rd and V is a positive semi-definite d × d matrix. Find necessary and sufficient conditions on the data S0 , µ and V such that there is no arbitrage. When there is no arbitrage, use the previous problem to find a martingale deflator. 1 Problem 6. (Stiemke’s theorem) Let A be a m × n matrix. Prove that exactly one of the following statements is true: • There exists an x ∈ Rn with xi > 0 for all i = 1, . . . , n such that Ax = 0. • There exists a y ∈ Rm with (AT y)i ≥ 0 for all i = 1, . . . , n such that AT y 6= 0. What does this have to do with finance? Problem 7. Consider a discrete time model with n asset with prices (Pt )t≥0 and dividends (δt )t≥1 . Explain why an appropriate self-financing condition is Ht · (Pt + δt ) = Ht+1 · Pt + ct . Let Z be a positive process such that the process t ! X Zt Pt + Zs δs s=1 t≥0
is a martingale. Show that there is no arbitrage in this market.
Problem 8. Consider a discrete time model with a asset with positive prices (Pt )t≥0 and non-negative dividends (δt )t≥1 . Show that there is a self-financing trading strategy with cor- Qt δs responding wealth process Qt = Pt s=1 1 + Ps . What is the financial significance of this process? Let Z be a positive adapted process. Show that the process Zt Pt + ts=1 Zs δs t≥0 P
is a martingale if and only if (Zt Qt )t≥0 is.
Problem 9. In discrete-time models, an asset is called risk-free iff its price process is pre- dictable. Suppose that asset 1 and asset 2 are risk-free, that the market with prices (P 1 , P 2 ) has no arbitrage, and that P01 = P02 . Show that Pt1 = Pt2 a.s. for all t ≥ 0. Problem 10. A bond1 is an asset that pays a fixed amount (the principal) at a fixed future time (the maturity date). Suppose that assets 1, . . . , n are bonds, each of principal amount £1, where asset i matures at time i. Show that if there is no arbitrage in the market, then each bond is a numéraire asset. Let H be the investment strategy of holding bond t during the interval (t − 1, t]. Show that the corresponding wealth process (called the money-market account) is risk-free. Problem 11. Let X and Y be martingales (with respect to the same filtration). Show that if XT = YT almost surely for some non-random T > 0, then Xt = Yt almost surely for all 0 ≤ t ≤ T. Problem 12. (Bayes’s formula) Let P and Q be equivalent probability measures defined on (Ω, F) with density Z = dQ dP . Let G ⊆ F be a sigma-field. Prove the identity: EP (ZX|G) EQ (X|G) = EP (Z|G) for each bounded random variable X. 1Many real world bonds pay the bondholder a fixed amount on a regular basis, every three months for instance, before the maturity date. These payments are called ‘coupons.’ The bonds we are now considering here are actually zero-coupon bonds. 2 Problem 13. Consider a single period market with two assets. The first asset is a riskless bond with prices B0 = 1 and B1 = 1 + r for a constant r. The second asset is a stock with prices (St )t∈{0,1} . Let (φ∗ , π ∗ ) be the optimal solution to the problem maximise EU (φB1 + πS1 ) subject to φB0 + πS0 = x for a given concave increasing utility function U . Prove that the investor is holds a non- negative number of shares of the stock if E S1 > (1 + r)S0 Does this agree with your intuition? Problem 14. (Tower property of conditional expectation) Let X and Y be identically distributed random variables taking values in the set {2n : n ≥ 0} such that X/Y ∈ {1/2, 2} almost surely and 1 P(X = 2n , Y = 2n+1 ) = 2−n = P(X = 2n+1 , Y = 2n ) for n ≥ 0. 4 1 (a) Show that P(X = 1) = 4 and 3 P(X = 2n ) = 2−n for n ≥ 1. 4 (b) Show that P(Y = 2|X = 1) = 1 and 1 P(Y = 2n+1 |X = 2n ) = = 1 − P(Y = 2n−1 |X = 2n ) for n ≥ 1. 3 (c) Let Z = Y − X. Show that E(Z|X = 1) = 1 and E(Z|X = 2n ) = 0 for n ≥ 1. (d) From part (c) we have E(Z|X) = 1{X=1} and hence 1 E(Z) = E[E(Z|X)] = > 0. 4 However, by symmetry we also have E(Z|Y ) = −1{Y =1} and 1 E(Z) = E[E(Z|Y )] = − < 0. 4 What has gone wrong?!
Philippine Refining Company (Now Known As "Unilever Philippines (PRC), Inc."), Petitioner, vs. Court of Appeals, Court of Tax Appeals, and The Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 118794