Madhur Goyal

19010272

The Gavel and the Glimmer: The Power of Media in Shaping Justice in To Kill a
Mockingbird and A Time to Kill

Abstract

This paper examines the portrayal of media's influence on racially charged trials in Harper
Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird and John Grisham's A Time to Kill. While both movies
acknowledge media's presence, they diverge in its portrayal. To Kill a Mockingbird depicts
media as a largely passive observer, allowing pre-existing racial bias to fester. A Time to Kill
showcases a more aggressive media, manipulating public opinion through sensationalism.
The paper explores the ethical dilemmas posed by media's influence and proposes solutions
such as promoting ethical journalism, strengthening judicial independence, fostering media
literacy, and harnessing technology for transparency.

Introduction

The courtroom serves as a battleground for justice, where evidence and arguments clash.
However, beyond the confines of the judicial chamber lies another powerful force that can
sway public opinion and potentially influence a trial's outcome: the media. This paper
analyses how To Kill a Mockingbird and A Time to Kill portray the power of media in
shaping justice within racially charged trials in the American South.

The Silent Witness: Media in "To Kill a Mockingbird"

Scout Finch, the young narrator of To Kill a Mockingbird, makes no mention of media
sensationalizing Tom Robinson's trial. This reflects the reality of small-town media in the
1930s, lacking the resources or inclination for extensive coverage. However, the absence of
overt media presence doesn't preclude its subtle influence. The trial itself becomes a spectacle
for the townspeople, and rumours spread like wildfire. Atticus Finch, Tom Robinson's lawyer,
becomes a target for whispers and gossip due to his defence of a black man. This suggests
that even without active media manipulation, the audience's presence can exert pressure on
the judicial process. The townspeople, fuelled by pre-existing racial prejudice, act as a de
facto media, disseminating their own biased narratives and influencing the social atmosphere
surrounding the trial.

The Amplified Voice: Media in "A Time to Kill"

1
Madhur Goyal
19010272

In contrast, media plays a much more aggressive role in A Time to Kill. Carl Lee Hailey's
trial, a black Vietnam veteran charged with murdering the men responsible for his daughter's
rape and death, attracts national media attention. Grisham paints a vivid picture of reporters
swarming the courthouse, vying for exclusive interviews and sensationalizing the case.
Television broadcasts air dramatized accounts of the crime, further inflaming racial tensions
in the already divided town of Clanton.

The media becomes a platform for both sides of the case. Jake Brigance, Carl Lee's lawyer,
utilizes the media to directly address the jury pool, appealing to their sense of justice and
highlighting the town's history of racial injustice. The prosecution, fuelled by racist
sentiments, uses media appearances to paint Carl Lee as a violent threat. This media war
creates a trial by public opinion, shifting the focus away from legal evidence and towards
emotional manipulation.

The Power of Perception: Media's Impact on Justice

The contrasting portrayals of media in both movies highlight its power to shape public
perception. In To Kill a Mockingbird, the lack of media control allows pre-existing racial
prejudice to fester, ultimately leading to a miscarriage of justice. Without a neutral platform
to present the facts, public opinion remains entrenched in bigotry, making it impossible for
Atticus's defence to sway the jury.

In A Time to Kill, the media's manipulation of public opinion takes centre stage. The trial
becomes a media spectacle, overshadowing the legal arguments and focusing on the
emotional narratives spun by both sides. While Brigance manages to utilize the media to his
advantage, the constant presence of cameras and reporters creates an atmosphere of
sensationalism that threatens to undermine the integrity of the judicial process.

The Ethical Quandary: Media's Responsibility

Both movies raise critical questions about the ethical responsibility of the media in covering
legal proceedings. To Kill a Mockingbird suggests that a lack of media oversight can allow
prejudice to flourish. On the other hand, A Time to Kill warns against using the media as a
tool for manipulation. In both cases, the ideal of a media that serves as an objective observer
of the judicial process remains elusive.

The Limitations of Objectivity: Race and Media Bias

2
Madhur Goyal
19010272

Achieving media objectivity proves particularly challenging when it comes to racially

charged cases. Both movies highlight the media's tendency to perpetuate existing racial
biases. In To Kill a Mockingbird, the Maycomb newspaper likely reflects the town's racist
ideology, potentially downplaying evidence that could support Tom Robinson's innocence. A
Time to Kill offers a more explicit portrayal of media bias, with national news outlets
focusing on sensational aspects of the case and framing the narrative through a white
supremacist lens. This reinforces the notion that media, even in its attempt to be objective,
can be unconsciously influenced by the dominant cultural narratives around race.

The Rise of Advocacy Journalism and its Implications

The movies also raise questions about the role of advocacy journalism in the courtroom. A
Time to Kill presents Jake Brigance's strategic use of media as a form of activism. By
directly addressing the public and challenging the town's racist narrative, Brigance attempts
to influence public opinion in favour of his client. This approach raises ethical concerns.
While advocacy journalism can be a powerful tool for exposing injustice, it blurs the line
between reporting and activism. Can journalists effectively advocate for a cause while still
maintaining objectivity in their reporting of the facts?

The Perils of Social Media: A Modern Dilemma

The conversation about media's influence on the justice system cannot be complete without
acknowledging the rise of social media. Unlike the controlled media environments depicted
in both movies, social media creates a free-for-all of information dissemination. Unverified
rumours, biased opinions, and inflammatory rhetoric can spread like wildfire on social media
platforms, potentially influencing jurors and swaying public opinion before a trial even
reaches the courtroom. This raises concerns about the ability to ensure a fair trial in the age
of social media and the need for stricter regulations or ethical guidelines for online discourse
surrounding legal proceedings.

Beyond the Black and White: The Nuances of Media's Influence

Ultimately, both movies resist simplistic portrayals of media's influence. While media can be
a powerful tool for manipulation, it can also be a platform for truth-telling and social critique.
The key lies in recognizing the media's multifaceted nature and encouraging responsible
journalism that upholds the principles of fairness and accuracy.

Finding Humanity: The Power of Narrative in "To Kill a Mockingbird"

3
Madhur Goyal
19010272

To Kill a Mockingbird offers a more optimistic perspective. Scout's innocent narration serves
as a counterpoint to the town's prejudice. By focusing on the human element of the case –
Tom Robinson's innocence and Atticus Finch's courage – the movie suggests that even in the
face of media silence, narratives that prioritize empathy and fairness can resonate with the
audience. Scout's coming-of-age story highlights the power of education and personal growth
in combating societal prejudice.

Taking a Stand: Activism in the Media in "A Time to Kill"

A Time to Kill presents a more cynical view. While the media's sensationalism poses a threat
to justice, the movie also acknowledges the potential of using the media for social activism.
Brigance's strategic use of media platforms allows him to challenge the town's racist narrative
and directly appeal to the jury. This suggests that even within a flawed media landscape,
lawyers and activists can utilize the media to expose injustice and advocate for change.

The Power of Framing: Shaping Public Discourse

Both movies highlight the concept of framing, a media tactic that emphasizes certain aspects
of an issue while downplaying others. In To Kill a Mockingbird, the framing of Tom
Robinson as a dangerous black man likely influenced the jury's verdict. A Time to Kill
showcases the prosecution's attempt to frame Carl Lee Hailey as a violent criminal rather than
a grieving father seeking revenge. Understanding how media frames narratives surrounding
legal cases allows for a more critical analysis of media coverage and its potential impact on
public perception.

The Symbiotic Relationship: Media and the Legal System

It's important to acknowledge the symbiotic relationship between media and the legal system.
The media relies on the legal system for newsworthy stories and courtroom drama. In return,
the legal system benefits from media coverage, which can raise public awareness about
important legal issues and hold the justice system accountable. However, this
interdependence can also create a dynamic where media spectacle takes precedence over the
pursuit of truth.

Looking Forward: The Changing Media Landscape

The media landscape has undergone a dramatic transformation since the publication of these
movies. The rise of social media has created new opportunities for both disseminating

4
Madhur Goyal
19010272

information and spreading misinformation. Legal proceedings are now often live-streamed,
blurring the lines between courtroom drama and public spectacle. This necessitates a renewed
conversation about the ethical responsibility of journalists and media consumers in the digital
age.

Media Literacy: Empowering the Public

Both movies emphasize the importance of media literacy in a world saturated with
information. Readers of To Kill a Mockingbird are encouraged to question the underlying
biases present in the Maycomb Journal. Similarly, A Time to Kill highlights the need to
critically analyse media portrayals and separate fact from sensationalized narratives.
Educating the public on media literacy is crucial for ensuring that citizens can critically
evaluate media coverage and form their own informed opinions about legal cases.

The Search for Solutions: A Multifaceted Approach

There are no easy solutions to the challenges posed by media's influence on the justice
system. However, several approaches can help mitigate these challenges:

Promoting Ethical Journalism: Upholding ethical standards in journalism is paramount.

This includes fact-checking, avoiding sensationalism, and presenting balanced coverage of all
sides of a legal case. Journalistic codes of ethics can provide valuable guidelines for
responsible reporting on legal proceedings.

Strengthening Judicial Independence: An independent judiciary free from undue media

pressure is essential for ensuring fair trials. Judges can play a role in mitigating media
influence by enforcing stricter courtroom rules regarding media presence and by limiting
public access to potentially prejudicial information.

Fostering Media Literacy: Equipping the public with media literacy skills is crucial in the
digital age. Educational initiatives can help citizens learn to critically analyse media
coverage, identify bias, and distinguish between fact and opinion.

Leveraging Technology for Transparency: Technology can be a double-edged sword in the

courtroom. However, it can also be used to promote transparency. Live-streaming court
proceedings, while requiring careful consideration of potential ethical issues, can increase
public access to the legal system and hold it accountable.

A Balancing Act

5
Madhur Goyal
19010272

The ideal scenario lies in achieving a balance where the media can report on trials fairly and
accurately, allowing the legal process to unfold without external pressures. However, both
movies acknowledge the limitations of such a solution. In deeply divided societies, even fair
media coverage may struggle to overcome pre-existing biases. The responsibility lies not
only with the media, but also with the legal system, educators, and the public itself, to work
together to ensure that media serves as a force for truth and justice, not manipulation and
spectacle.

Moving Forward: A Call to Action

To Kill a Mockingbird and A Time to Kill serve as powerful reminders of the enduring
tension between media freedom and the pursuit of justice. As the media landscape continues
to evolve, ongoing conversations are essential to ensure that the courtroom remains a place
where truth prevails and justice is served. By promoting ethical journalism, strengthening
judicial independence, fostering media literacy, and leveraging technology responsibly, we
can work towards a future where media plays a constructive role in upholding the principles
of a fair and just legal system.

Conclusion

This analysis has explored the complex and evolving relationship between media and the
justice system as portrayed in To Kill a Mockingbird and A Time to Kill. The contrasting
portrayals in both movies highlight the media's potential to both undermine and reinforce the
pursuit of justice.

As we wrap up our exploration of "To Kill a Mockingbird" and "A Time to Kill," it's clear
that both stories highlight how media can significantly sway the scales of justice. These
narratives vividly depict the intricate dance between media representation, legal strategies,
and societal biases, showcasing how the media can either uphold truth or perpetuate bias.

In "To Kill a Mockingbird," Harper Lee crafts a tale set in the racially tense 1930s Alabama,
where the media serves as a powerful tool in shaping public opinion. We witness Atticus
Finch, a beacon of morality in a prejudiced society, trying to counter biased media narratives
as he defends a black man falsely accused of a crime. Despite his efforts to uphold fairness,
the overwhelming influence of prejudiced media ultimately undermines the integrity of the
trial.

6
Madhur Goyal
19010272

On the other hand, "A Time to Kill" offers a stark portrayal of racial divide and systemic
injustice in a small Mississippi town. Here, media sensationalism exacerbates tensions
surrounding the trial of Carl Lee Hailey, a black man seeking justice for his daughter's
assault. Defence attorney Jake Brigance strategically employs media tactics to sway public
opinion, but the media circus surrounding the trial underscores the delicate balance between
justice and sensationalism.

In essence, the gavel symbolizes the formal mechanisms of justice, guided by principles of
fairness and impartiality. However, the glimmer of media influence casts a shadow of bias
and prejudice over the proceedings. It's a reminder of the significant responsibility media
outlets hold in shaping public perception and influencing trial outcomes.

In conclusion, it's clear that responsible media reporting and critical evaluation of its impact
are crucial in upholding the principles of justice and equality in society. "The Gavel and the
Glimmer" encapsulates the complex interplay between media, law, and society depicted in
these stories, urging us to remain vigilant in ensuring that the pursuit of justice remains
untainted by bias and sensationalism.

References

 Alderson, Valerie. Media Law and Ethics (Oxford University Press, 2021).
 Boynton, G. R. A History of American Law (Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1980).
 Ekman, Paul. Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Marriage, and Politics
(W. W. Norton & Company, 2009).
 Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed (Continuum, 2000).
 Gaines, Jane Schafer, and Leah A. Lievrouw. Collaborative Journalism: Producing
Under Pressure (Lexington Books, 2014).
 Gillmor, Donald M. We the Media: Grassroots Journalism in the Age of the Internet
(P.H. Reiher, 2004).
 Grisham, John. A Time to Kill (Dell Publishing, 1989).
 Grossman, Lawrence K. The Electronic Republic: Reshaping Democracy in the
Information Age (Oxford University Press, 1997).
 Lee, Harper. To Kill a Mockingbird (J.B. Lippincott & Co., 1960).
 Lewis, Justin. The Framing Game: Political Spin and the Media (PublicAffairs, 2004).

7
Madhur Goyal
19010272

 MacKinnon, Ronald. Reflecting on Media Ethics (Broadview Press, 2011).

 McChesney, Robert W. Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Public Interest Television in an
Age of Global Monopoly (New Press, 1999).
 Sunstein, Cass R. Infotainment Apocalypse: How the Mass Media Inflame Our
Culture (Oxford University Press, 2001).
 Wicks, Wilson. Media Literacy: Keys to Interpreting Media Messages (Wadsworth
Publishing Company, 1993).
 American Bar Association Center for Professional Responsibility. "Model Rules of
Professional Conduct." (accessed April 9, 2024).
 Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University. "Joan
Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy."
https://shorensteincenter.org/ (accessed April 9, 2024).
 Crenshaw, Kimberlé W. Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the
Movement (New York University Press, 1995).
 Early, Gerald. "Critical Race Theory and the Politics of Literary Form." Critical Race
Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement, edited by Kimberlé W.
Crenshaw, New York University Press, 1995.
 Goffman, Erving. "Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience"
Harvard University Press, 1974.
 Hackett, Robert. "Advocacy Journalism."
https://regener-online.de/journalcco/2006_2/pdf/hackett.pdf (accessed April 9, 2024).
 Society of Professional Journalists. "SPJ Code of Ethics." https://www.spj.org/pdf/spj-
code-of-ethics.pdf (accessed April 9, 2024).
 Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. "Critical Race Theory."
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/critical-phil-race/ (accessed April 9, 2024).