Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DECLARATION
We as a group declare that this proposal report is my own research and has neither been used
nor submitted in any institution or university for any academic award.
Signature……………………...........
Date………/…………/…………….
ACKNOLEDGEMENT
We extend our sincere thanks to the Almighty GOD who has gifted us with life and has
enabled us to reach this academic height as He has been the provider of all the necessary
requirements.
Great thanks to my beloved family and friends for their endless encouragement and moral
support and for their prayers and piece of advice given to me in the course of this project.
Our sincere gratitude also goes to my supervisor Mr. Kimbowa George for his continuous
guidance during this research. His advice and tireless effort were quite instrumental for the
success of this research
Table of content
1. CHAPTER ONE
1.1 Introduction
Introduction
Biogas, a renewable energy source produced through the anaerobic digestion of organic matter, has
a long history of utilization dating back to ancient civilizations. The design and construction of biogas-
powered systems have evolved significantly over time, driven by technological advancements,
environmental concerns, and the need for sustainable energy solutions(Barui & Mondal, 2023).
1.2 Background
Access to clean and reliable water supply is a global concern, particularly in rural and underserved
communities. Across the world, various initiatives and research projects have been undertaken to
address this issue through innovative approaches, including the integration of renewable energy
technologies with water supply systems.
In Africa, where water scarcity and energy poverty are prevalent, there has been increasing interest
in decentralized solutions to provide sustainable water and energy services to rural populations.
Countries like Kenya, Tanzania, and Ethiopia have implemented pilot projects and research initiatives
focusing on biogas-powered water supply systems, demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of such
integrated approaches (Winrock International, 2017; Mwirigi et al., 2020).
In Uganda, a landlocked country in East Africa, access to clean water remains a significant challenge,
especially in rural areas where centralized infrastructure is often lacking. Despite efforts by the
government and development partners to improve water access, many communities continue to rely
on unsafe sources or travel long distances to fetch water (Ministry of Water and Environment, 2018).
Nakaseke District, located in central Uganda, exemplifies the broader water and energy challenges
faced by rural communities in the country. With limited access to modern energy sources and
unreliable water supply services, residents rely on traditional biomass for cooking and heating, while
also facing water scarcity issues, particularly during dry seasons (UBOS, 2020).
Within Nakaseke District, Kapeeka sub-county stands out as a potential area for implementing
innovative solutions to address water and energy challenges. Its rural character, combined with
agricultural activity and community engagement opportunities, makes it a suitable candidate for
research and pilot projects aimed at implementing biogas-powered water supply systems (Gasana &
Cavendish, 2015):
Background
The concept of biogas production can be traced back to as early as 10th century BC, with evidence of
biogas being utilized in ancient Persia for heating baths. However, it was not until the 19th century
that biogas gained traction as a viable energy source, with the development of anaerobic digestion
technology by scientists such as Alessandro Volta and Sir Humphry Davy. The first commercial biogas
plant was established in Exeter, England, in 1895, marking the beginning of modern biogas utilization.
Worldwide Biogas-powered systems are utilized worldwide across various sectors, including
agriculture, wastewater treatment, and decentralized energy production. According to the
International Energy Agency (IEA), there were over 20,000 biogas plants operating globally in 2020,
with significant installations in Europe, Asia, and North America. These systems collectively produce
millions of cubic meters of biogas annually, displacing fossil fuels and reducing greenhouse gas
emissions.
Biogas Utilization in Africa: In Africa, biogas utilization has gained momentum in recent years, albeit
at a slower pace compared to other regions. Countries such as Kenya, Tanzania, and South Africa
have made notable strides in promoting biogas technology for rural electrification, cooking, and
agricultural applications. However, challenges such as limited access to financing, inadequate
infrastructure, and policy barriers hinder the widespread adoption of biogas-powered systems in
many African countries.
In Uganda, like other African nations, faces energy and environmental challenges that biogas
technology can help address. While the adoption of biogas systems in Uganda has been relatively
modest, there is growing recognition of its potential benefits, particularly in rural areas where access
to modern energy services is limited. Initiatives such as the Uganda National Biogas Program (UNBP)
have been established to promote the dissemination of biogas technology and provide support to
households and communities interested in adopting biogas systems.
The future of biogas-powered systems appears promising, with projections indicating continued
growth and diversification of applications. The increasing emphasis on renewable energy, circular
economy principles, and sustainable development goals is expected to drive further investment and
innovation in biogas technology. Key areas for future development include the integration of biogas
into decentralized energy grids, expansion of biogas production from diverse feedstocks, and
enhancement of end-use applications such as transportation fuel and industrial processes.
In addition, access to clean water remains a significant challenge in rural areas of Uganda, including
Nakaseke District. Despite agricultural activity generating organic waste suitable for biogas
production, communities continue to face water scarcity issues, particularly during dry seasons.
Traditional water supply systems are often unreliable and unsustainable, exacerbating health risks
and hindering agricultural productivity. Addressing these challenges requires innovative solutions
that integrate renewable energy technologies with water supply infrastructure. Thus, there is a
pressing need to design and construct biogas-powered water supply systems tailored to the specific
socio-economic and environmental context of rural communities in Nakaseke District, Central
Uganda. Limitation of fossil energy reserves, threats posed by environmental destruction, harmful
effects of greenhouse gas emissions and problems arising from disposal and recycling of human
excreta, livestock and municipal waste have caused to increasing public interest to utilization of
renewable energy especially from waste and biogas production(Ogur, E.; Irungu, 2015).
1.5. Abstract
It is estimated that nearly 1.3 billion tonnes of food including fresh vegetables, fruits, meat, bakery,
and dairy products are lost along the food supply chain. Also, the carbon footprint of food waste is
estimated to contribute to the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by accumulating approximately 3.3
billion tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere annually (Paritosh et al., 2017)
The biogas industry has been identified to be uniquely positioned to address nine of the 17
sustainable development goals (SDGs) – perhaps conceivably more than any other sector (WBA,
2017) (Table 1). These nine SDGs pertain to food and energy security, well-being, gender equality,
sustainable water management and sanitation, resilient regions and cities, sustainable
industrialization and combating the effects of climate change (Figure 1).
Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well- Reducing indoor air pollution by substituting
being for all at all ages solid biomass-based domestic fuels with biogas
Treating and recycling sewage and organic
wastes to reduce odours and the spread of
diseases
Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower Reducing the burden of collecting firewood to
all women and girls improve the quality of women’s and children’s
lives, reducing household labour in cooking
Goal 6: Ensure availability and sustainable Providing decentralized, local treatment of bio-
management of water and sanitation for all solids in remote and rural communities to
reduce odours and the spread of disease
Stabilizing and recycling bio-solids through AD
to allow them to be applied back to land
Reducing the carbon loading of wastewater to
reduce impact on water bodies
Goal 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote Improving the self-sufficiency and sustainability
inclusive and sustainable industrialization and of industries by extracting the energy from their
foster innovation own effluents and using it for the self-
generation of electricity and/or heat
Collaboration between industries and
agriculture for mutual benefit Generating short-
term construction employment and long-term
equipment manufacturing and maintenance
employment Encouraging growth of micro-
enterprises by providing reliable electricity that
can be stored and used when needed, that is
baseload energy
Goal 11: Make cities and human settlements Preventing spread of diseases through collection
inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable and proper management of organic waste
Improving sanitation and hygiene through
decentralized and local treatment of bio-solids
Stabilizing the sludge from wastewater
treatment to protect the marine environment
and urban air quality Improving urban air quality
by substituting fossil fuel with bio-methane in
vehicles Improving urban air quality by
substituting solid fuel for domestic cooking and
heating with biogas Reducing greenhouse gas
emissions by using biogas-based renewable
energy in buildings, homes and industry
Goal 13: take urgent action to combat climate Reducing carbon dioxide emissions by replacing
change and its impacts fossil-fuel-based energy sources with biogas and
commercial fertilizers with digestate bio-
fertilizer Reduction of methane and nitrous
oxide emissions from livestock manures
Reduction of methane and generation of
renewable energy from food and other organic
wastes Capturing emissions from landfills
Reducing deforestation by replacing solid-
biomass-based domestic fuels with biogas
Goal 15: Protect, restore and promote Recirculating nutrients and organic matter in
sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, organic wastes through AD and returning them
sustainably manage forests, combat to the soil in the form of digestate bio-fertilizer
desertification, and halt and reverse land Substituting firewood with biogas as a domestic
degradation and halt biodiversity loss fuel, reducing deforestation
1.7. Justification
The integration of biogas with water supply systems aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs), particularly Goal 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) and Goal 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy),
emphasizing the importance of access to clean water and sustainable energy for all (United Nations,
2015). In Uganda, the government has prioritized renewable energy development and rural water
supply as key components of its development agenda (Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development,
2019; Ministry of Water and Environment, 2018). However, there remains a gap in the
implementation of biogas-powered water supply systems, necessitating research to explore the
potential and challenges specific to the Ugandan context.
Nakaseke District, particularly Kapeeka sub-county, faces significant water scarcity challenges,
exacerbated by limited access to modern energy sources (UBOS, 2020). The implementation of a
biogas-powered water supply system in this local context offers a sustainable solution that addresses
both water and energy need simultaneously, benefiting the local community and promoting socio-
economic development.
The design of a biogas-powered water supply system integrates two crucial aspects of sustainable
development: renewable energy and clean water access. Biogas, generated from organic waste,
offers an eco-friendly alternative to traditional fossil fuels. With a potential of reducing biomass
consumption by up to 16% (Korberg et al., 2020). When utilized to power water supply systems, it
not only ensures reliable access to clean water but also contributes to environmental conservation.
This literature review explores existing research, technologies, and methodologies relevant to the
design of such systems, aiming to provide insights and guidance for the development of an efficient
and sustainable biogas-powered water supply system.
This work aims to design a unique concept of a biogas-fuelled power generating system and analysis
performance that can enhance renewable-based power generation for a water supply system.
With the increase in energy demand, the problems related to load shedding, grid outages, etc. have
increased, which results in huge economic loss for sectors that only depend on electricity for water
supply therefore, more investment toward power sources is necessary to mitigate this problem. The
development of biomass-based power sources will lead to waste management, overcome energy
demands, and help in lowering load shedding. Therefore, strengthening Biogas power generation will
not only increase the power capacity of Renewable energy sources (RESs) but also minimize the
depletion of fossil fuelss
Access to clean water is fundamental for human health, agriculture, and industrial activities.
Traditional water supply systems often rely on fossil fuels for pumping and distribution, leading to
environmental pollution and resource depletion. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in
integrating renewable energy sources into water supply systems to mitigate these issues. Solar, wind,
and hydropower have been extensively studied for this purpose, but biogas presents unique
advantages due to its versatility and compatibility with existing infrastructure.
c) During pumping hours, the inflow of water through leaks may cause water contamination.
2.1.3. Biogas
Biogas a renewable fuel that's produced when organic matter, such as food or animal waste, is
broken down by microorganisms in the absence of oxygen. This process is called anaerobic digestion.
For this to take place, the waste material needs to be enclosed in an environment where there is no
oxygen.
The biogas fuel is produced in a fermenter by the process of fermentation. The raw materials like
agricultural waste, kitchen waste, organic waste, etc. are injected into the fermenter through the
inlet and the gas which is generated is connected to the biogas engine with a valve.
I. Hydrolysis
Hydrolysis is the first step of anaerobic digestion that takes place without the presence of oxygen.
In hydrolysis process, insoluble complex biomass is converted into the soluble organic compound in
the
presence of hydrolytic bacteria, proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates are all transformed into sugars,
ammonia acids, and fatty acids in this process.
II. Acidogenesis
It involves converting soluble organic compounds to short chain fatty acid and alcohol. Acidogenesis
is the second stage of the anaerobic digestion process also known as
fermentation process. The bacteria involved in this process are known as acid formers. The water and
acetic
acid (CH3COOH) are transformed into hydrogen (H2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) at the end of this
process.
III. Acetogenesis
Acetogenesis is the third stage of the AD process. Carbon dioxide, acetic acid and hydrogen are
formed from short-chain fatty acid and alcohol is known as acetogenesis. It involves the
hydrogenation and dehydrogenation process.
IV. Methanogenesis
Methanogenesis is considered the last phase of the anaerobic digestion process. The end product of
methanogenesis is methane gas (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), and water (H2O). The methanogenesis
process has two stages. In the first stage, acetic acid is converted into methane, and in the second
stage, hydrogen is converted into methane by utilizing carbon dioxide.
Dairy manure is fed into the biogas digester. Biogas is produced after the retention period. In
general retention period for diary, manure is around 45 days. The fixed dome type biogas reactor is
generally used for power generation. In fact, the methane gas output depends on the temperature of
the reactor (Treact), the reactor volume (V), summation of volatile fatty acids concentration in reactor
(Sv), methanogens concentration (Xmeth), and constant monod half velocity for methanogens (Ksc).
Amount of methane gas from the biogas reactor is given in the
Where ρ is density of water 1g/〖 cm 〗3 and E Motor is the motor efficiency is 92% or higher
Where Z is the suction lift which is the distance between suction end to the pump centreline
Pa is atmospheric pressure, Pv is vapour pressure of water and H f are friction losses in the pipes.
Q = A*V or Q = ( π /4 ¿ D 2∗V
Where;
Q= flow (m 3 /s ¿
While V is assumed and Q is known, it is easy to calculate the diameter/ size of the required pipe.
H L=f ( L/ D ) ( V 2 /2 g )
Where:
V is the velocity of water in pipe between 0.7 m/s – 3m/s (Ashok k, 2019)
Integration of Biogas and Water Supply: The integration of biogas into water supply systems involves
multiple components and considerations, including biogas production, storage, purification, and
utilization for pumping and distribution. Research efforts have focused on optimizing system design
and operation to maximize energy efficiency and minimize environmental impact.
Methodology: Sharma et al. (2019) utilized a participatory approach involving local communities to
design and construct low-cost anaerobic digesters suitable for small-scale water supply systems in
rural areas. The design process involved assessing available resources, such as feedstock and labor, to
optimize system efficiency and affordability.
Results: The constructed biogas power generation system demonstrated promising performance,
producing sufficient biogas to power water pumps consistently. The simplicity of the design
facilitated easy replication and maintenance, making it suitable for resource-constrained settings.
Limitations: Despite its effectiveness, the design approach may not be universally applicable, as local
conditions and resource availability vary across regions. Additionally, the scalability of the system for
larger water supply networks may require further optimization and engineering expertise.
Practical Implications: The participatory design approach adopted in this study holds significant
practical implications for community-based water supply projects, enabling local stakeholders to take
ownership of the system and ensure its long-term sustainability.
Results: The performance evaluation revealed satisfactory system efficiency, with the biogas-
powered water pump meeting the water demand of the community consistently. However,
fluctuations in gas production and occasional mechanical failures were observed, highlighting the
need for continuous monitoring and maintenance.
Limitations:
The field trial duration may not have captured long-term performance trends, and the study's focus
on a specific geographic location limits the generalizability of the findings to other contexts.
Methodology: Mengistu et al. (2019) conducted surveys and water consumption assessments in rural
communities to estimate water demand and usage patterns. Economic analysis was performed using
cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness methodologies, considering factors such as capital investment,
operation, and maintenance costs.
Results: The study identified significant variations in water demand across different seasons and
demographic groups, highlighting the need for flexible system design and capacity planning.
Economic analysis demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of biogas-powered water supply systems
compared to conventional alternatives, particularly in off-grid areas with limited access to electricity.
Limitations: The economic analysis may have overlooked certain indirect costs and benefits
associated with biogas technology adoption, such as environmental and social impacts. Additionally,
the study's reliance on survey data introduces potential biases and uncertainties in water demand
estimation.
Practical Implications: Findings from the water demand assessment and economic analysis inform
decision-making processes and investment priorities, facilitating the adoption of sustainable water
supply solutions in resource-constrained settings.
Methodology: Kumar et al. (2020) conducted comprehensive pump tests using a hydraulic test rig to
evaluate the performance of biogas-driven water pumps. The experiments involved measuring
parameters such as flow rate, head, and power consumption at different operating points.
Results: Pump testing revealed the hydraulic efficiency and energy consumption of biogas-powered
water pumps under different load conditions. The experimental data facilitated the characterization
of pump performance curves and the identification of optimal operating points for energy-saving
purposes.
Limitations: The laboratory-based pump testing may not fully capture real-world performance
variations due to factors such as system dynamics and environmental influences. Additionally, the
study's focus on a specific pump model limits the generalizability of the findings to other pump types
and configurations.
Practical Implications: Insights gained from pump testing contribute to the selection and optimization
of biogas-powered water pumps for optimal system performance and energy efficiency, facilitating
the deployment of sustainable water supply solutions in diverse settings
Concepts
For specific objective one:
Anaerobic Digestion Process: The process of converting organic matter into biogas through anaerobic
digestion is fundamental to biogas power generation systems (Sharma et al., 2019).
Gas Storage Systems: Proper design and construction of gas storage facilities are essential to ensure
efficient utilization of biogas for power generation (Rahman et al., 2021).
System Integration and Automation: Integration of biogas power generation systems with water
supply infrastructure and automation technologies enhances system efficiency and reliability (Kumar
et al., 2020).
Field Trials and Experimental Setup: Field trials and controlled experiments are conducted to
evaluate the performance of biogas-powered water supply systems under real-world conditions
(Sharma et al., 2019).
Data Analysis and Interpretation: Data collected during performance testing are analyzed to assess
system behavior and identify areas for improvement (Kumar et al., 2020).
Comparative Studies: Comparative studies may be conducted to compare the performance of biogas-
powered water supply systems with conventional systems or alternative renewable energy sources
(Mengistu et al., 2019).
Population and Demographic Analysis: Population growth and demographic characteristics are
important factors influencing water demand projections and consumption estimates (Kumar et al.,
2020).
Climate and Environmental Factors: Climate conditions and environmental factors such as
temperature, precipitation, and land use patterns influence water demand dynamics and seasonal
variations (Li et al., 2018).
Water Supply Infrastructure: The availability and condition of existing water supply infrastructure
play a significant role in determining water demand and distribution capabilities (Rahman et al.,
2021).
Hydrological Modelling: Hydrological modelling techniques are used to simulate water demand
scenarios and predict future water usage patterns based on various influencing factors (Sharma et
al., 2019).
Life Cycle Costing: Life cycle costing considers the total cost of ownership of the system over its
operational lifespan, including initial investment, operation, maintenance, and decommissioning
costs (Rahman et al., 2021).
Economic Viability Assessment: Economic viability assessment evaluates the financial sustainability
of the biogas-powered water supply system by comparing its costs to the benefits it generates over
time (Kumar et al., 2020).
Financial Metrics: Financial metrics such as payback period, return on investment (ROI), and net
present value (NPV) are used to quantify the economic performance and profitability of the system
(Li et al., 2018).
Socioeconomic Impact Assessment: Socioeconomic impact assessment considers the broader social
and environmental benefits of implementing a biogas-powered water supply system, beyond
financial considerations (Sharma et al., 2019).
Specific objective four:
Hydraulic Performance Testing: Hydraulic performance testing involves evaluating the flow rate,
head, and efficiency of the water pump under various operating conditions (Kumar et al., 2020).
Optimization and Calibration: Optimization and calibration of the pump involve adjusting operational
parameters to maximize efficiency and performance (Sharma et al., 2019).
Comparative Analysis: Comparative analysis compares the performance of different pump models or
configurations to identify the most suitable option for the biogas-powered water supply system
(Rahman et al., 2021).
Performance Curve Generation: Performance curve generation involves plotting pump performance
data to visualize the relationship between flow rate, head, and power consumption (Mengistu et al.,
2019).
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD): The amount of oxygen required to oxidize organic matter present
in a given volume of wastewater that can be done chemically by using dissolved dichromate in acid.
Total Organic Carbon (TOC):
Total amount of organic carbon present in a sample of aqueous waste. Total Suspended Solids (TSS):
Part of all solids in the wastewater (coarse particles to colloidal particles) that are dissolved in
wastewater.
Dissolved Oxygen (DO): Rate of oxygen dissolution in water that displays power of natural
spontaneous wastewater treatment. These factors directly affect the quality of wastewater and
resulting biogas. In addition to the above indicators, there are other factors that can change the
environment in wastewater treatment and biogas production process affect the quality and quantity
of biogas(Ogur, E.; Irungu, 2015).
PH: Methane production is largely dependent on PH value. So that if the PH value is less than 6.2,
methane production in digester will stop. So the best range of PH range for prepare methane
production will be 6.8 to 7.2. VS: the volatile solids of slog in digester that shows the amount of
bacteria's food. All of factors that are explained above and some side related factors (that will come
in following) must be consider as control parameters in control system design(Ogur, E.; Irungu, 2015).
3. CHAPTER THREE
3.1. METHODOLOGY
V dc =1.89 N c
v dh=0.1 N h
where V dc and v dh are volume of cow dung digester and human waste digester respectively
Q=V . A
2 1
1
V = ¿ R 3∗S 2
n
Where; Q-discharge
V- velocity
R- hydraulic radius
S- slope
A-Cross-sectional area
Easy installation without civil works Quick biogas production start-up after installation small digester
tank volume, therefore appropriate for few livestock
Provides constant gas pressure at Outlet Visual indication (floating gasholder level above the pit) of
the amount of available gas is possible
Very expensive compared to fixed dome digesters Steel drum (gasholder) is subject to corrosion
shorter lifespan than fixed dome technology
Long lifespan: more than 20 years Not damageable (underground) Many references for other fixed
dome technologies (e.g. 2,700 units in Rwanda, 8,000 units in Kenya and 250,000 units in Nepal) Easy
to operate Expensive technology USD 800-1500 for household units Potentially long durations before
the start-up of the biogas production Maximum size is up to 100m
Applicable for large installation of 1000 m3 scale. Large scale application for several hundreds of kW
generation is possible. Construction cost is high. Membrane life is short and it needs replacement.
We shall conduct experimental testing under various operating conditions to assess the performance
of the biogas water powered system. This involves systematically altering parameters such as biogas
feedstock composition, water flow rates, and system configurations to evaluate their impact on
system efficiency and output. Measure the flow rate of water from the system under different
operating conditions (e.g., varying loads, biogas input rates).
Performance Evaluation:
Evaluate the performance of the biogas water powered system based on key performance indicators
such as energy conversion efficiency, power output, reliability, and environmental impact. Interpret
the results in light of the system's intended applications and potential for scalability
3.1.3. Objective 3: Assess the water demand and economic analysis of the system
3.1.3.1. Water demand
Water demand is the amount of water needed or used by the individuals, households, industries,
and communities for portable purposes.
A common equation used to estimate the average daily water demand for a household is:
Q=A×P×C
Where:
C = runoff coefficient which is the factor that represents the proportion of rainfall that is collected as
runoff and available for harvesting.
To accurately determine water demand involves collecting data on water use patterns, conducting
surveys and using mathematical models to simulate water usage under different scenarios.
Cost analysis
For feasibility study of this
plan, the economical evaluation is considered based on the cost benefit analysis of this
project. To calculate the capacity of the system the following assumptions were made (Ghazi
& Abbaspour, 2011): The amount of biogas production is equal to 100-160 cubic meter from
each ton of organic
wastes which can be produced about 170 kwh of electricity and 340 kwh of heating energy
(S. Ghazi1*, M. Abbaspour2, 2011).
• Each 10 cubic meters of biogas can be produced about 15 kw of AC electricity and 35000
kcal of heating water
• Each unit of biogas can produced about 25-30 cubic meter of organic fertilizer per day in
55-60° C during 15 to 20 days.
• Each cubic meter of organic compost weights 0.7 ton and the weight of 25-30 cubic
meters of produced compost is equal to 17.5 or 21 ton.
This is used for rough estimation. Past tender prices of similar projects will be referred for each
component. Cost survey for Items that are not included in past projects will be conducted in the
market.
Pump testing
Pump Selection and Installation: Select an appropriate pump type based on the system
requirements, such as centrifugal pumps or positive displacement pumps. Install the pump
according to manufacturer guidelines and industry standards to ensure proper functionality and
longevity.
4. Pump Testing Protocol: Develop a comprehensive testing protocol to evaluate the performance
of the biogas-powered water pump under various operating conditions. This should include
measurements of flow rate, head, efficiency, power consumption, and any other relevant
parameters using appropriate instrumentation.
5. Experimental Testing: Conduct experimental testing of the pump according to the established
protocol. Perform tests under varying conditions such as different biogas flow rates, water demand
levels, and system pressures to assess the pump's performance across its operating range
e appropriate type and size of biogas digester(s) on factors such as feedstock availability, energy
demand, and community needs.
Develop detailed engineering designs for the biogas generating system, including digester
dimensions, inlet and outlet configurations, gas storage options, and safety features.
Consider integration with existing water supply infrastructure for pumping and distribution purposes.
Procure materials and equipment required for constructing the biogas generating system, including
digester tanks, piping, gas storage vessels, and safety devices.
Engage local suppliers and contractors wherever possible to promote community involvement and
support local economies.
Follow engineering specifications and safety standards during the construction process, ensuring
proper installation and functionality of all system components.
Install the biogas generating system according to the designed layout and specifications, ensuring
proper alignment, sealing, and connection of all components.
Conduct rigorous testing and commissioning of the system to verify functionality, gas production
rates, and safety features.
Train local technicians and community members on system operation, maintenance procedures,
safety protocols, and troubleshooting techniques.
Establish monitoring mechanisms to track the performance of the biogas generating system over
time, including gas production, water supply reliability, energy output, and environmental impacts.
Collect data on system utilization, user satisfaction, and socio-economic benefits through surveys,
interviews, and participatory observation.
Continuously assess the system's efficiency, effectiveness, and sustainability, making adjustments as
needed to optimize performance and address emerging challenges.
Document the entire process of designing and constructing the biogas generating system, including
technical drawings, construction logs, photographs, and instructional manuals.
Disseminate findings, lessons learned, and best practices through reports, workshops, community
meetings, and online platforms to facilitate knowledge sharing and replication in similar contexts.
Table 1. Biogas and sustainable development goals. Sustainable development goal Contribution of AD
Water demand
Water demand is the amount of water needed or used by the individuals, households, industries,
and communities for portable purposes.
A common equation used to estimate the average daily water demand for a household is:
Q=A×P×C
Where:
C = runoff coefficient which is the factor that represents the proportion of rainfall that is collected as
runoff and available for harvesting.
To accurately determine water demand involves collecting data on water use patterns, conducting
surveys and using mathematical models to simulate water usage under different scenarios.
References:
Mwirigi, J. N., & Cui, X. (2019). Biogas production in sub-Saharan Africa: Opportunities, challenges,
and development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118199. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118199]
Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). (2018). National Population and Housing Census 2014 - Main
Report. Kampala, Uganda: Uganda Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved from [https://www.ubos.org/wp-
content/uploads/publications/03_20182014_National_Census_Main_Report.pdf]
Ministry of Water and Environment (MWE). (2019). Sector Performance Report 2018. Kampala,
Uganda: Ministry of Water and Environment, Government of Uganda. Retrieved from
[https://www.mwe.go.ug/sites/default/files/library/SPR2018%20Final%20May%207%202019.pdf]
World Bank Group. (2021). Uganda - Overview. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Retrieved from
[https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/uganda/overview]
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development (MEMD). (2020). Uganda’s Energy Policy 2002.
Kampala, Uganda: Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development, Government of Uganda. Retrieved
from [https://www.energy.go.ug/sites/default/files/Uganda%27s%20Energy%20Policy%202002.pdf]
Low
starvation standard of
Poor sanitation and
hygiene Low production rates in
beverages industries
Acivities
Regular inspection of the system
Procurement
Sizing
Tools
Flow meter Biogas-digesters
Excel Questionnaire
Pipes
Data
Population data
Expected results
Reliable water supply system
Improved standard of living
Conclusion
There is a need of integrating renewable energy in water supply systems to achieve sustainable
development goals, reliable water supply systems and overcome energy insecurity. Biogas is a clean
and renewable energy source for powering water supply systems, offering numerous environmental
benefits and the potential to enhance the resilience and self-sufficiency of communities, particularly
in rural and off-grid areas. By incorporating existing knowledge and technologies, together with
improved research and innovation, the design of efficient and sustainable biogas-powered water
supply systems can be realized, contributing to enhanced access to clean and reliable water.
Recommendation.
Further research and practical applications are needed to optimize design parameters, enhance
performance efficiency, and promote widespread adoption of this transformative technology for the
benefit of communities worldwide.Most electricity generators require a constant gas supply and high
gas quality in terms of absence of impurities like H2S.(Wasajja et al., 2021) Therefore, to efficiently
use the biogas from existing decentralized anaerobic digesters for electricity production, higher
quality and stable biogas flow must be guaranteed. The installation of a biogas upgrading and buffer
system could be considered.Research has shown that there is a potential to locally enhance biogas
quality and quantity from small-scale digesters via available pre-treatment methods for feedstock,
co-digestion, additives and operational practices.More research should be carried out to support the
integration of other renewable energy sources such as solar energy.
References:
IEA Bioenergy. (2020). Biogas for Domestic, Industrial and Rural Purposes: Challenges and
Opportunities. IEA Bioenergy.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). (2022). Biogas Basics: A Primer on Biogas
Technology and Markets. NREL/TP-7A40-82697.
Sibanda, T., et al. (2021). Biogas in Africa: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges.
Renewable Energy Focus, 38, 414-424. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ref.2021.09.008]
Uganda National Biogas Program (UNBP). (2020). Annual Report 2020. UNBP.
Sharma, A., Bhagat, S. S., & Bhatti, M. S. (2019). Design and performance evaluation of a
small-scale biogas plant for rural energy supply. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization,
and Environmental Effects, 41(20), 2521-2536.
Khan, M. A., Khan, Z. M., Khattak, S. A., & Khan, M. A. (2020). Effect of temperature on biogas
production rate: A review. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 95(5), 1225-1237.
Rahman, A. S., Kumar, A., Thakur, A., Sharma, A., & Kim, H. S. (2021). Recent advancements in
biogas purification and storage: A review. Renewable Energy, 170, 1603-1619.
Li, Y., Wen, X., Yan, C., & Zhang, S. (2018). A review on renewable energy powered water
pumping systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81(1), 1636-1643.
Kumar, R., Samadder, S. R., & Singh, A. (2020). Modeling and automation of biogas-based hybrid
energy system for rural electrification. Renewable Energy, 146, 526-536.
Li, Y., Wen, X., Yan, C., & Zhang, S. (2018). A review on renewable energy powered water
pumping systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81(1), 1636-1643.
Rahman, A. S., Kumar, A., Thakur, A., Sharma, A., & Kim, H. S. (2021). Recent advancements in
biogas purification and storage: A review. Renewable Energy, 170, 1603-1619.
Sharma, A., Bhagat, S. S., & Bhatti, M. S. (2019). Design and performance evaluation of a small-
scale biogas plant for rural energy supply. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and
Environmental Effects, 41(20), 2521-2536.
Kumar, R., Samadder, S. R., & Singh, A. (2020). Modeling and automation of biogas-based
hybrid energy system for rural electrification. Renewable Energy, 146, 526-536.
Mengistu, M. G., Belay, A. S., & Asfaw, S. L. (2019). Design and performance evaluation of solar
and biogas hybrid water supply system. Energy Reports, 5, 776-784.
Mengistu, M. G., Belay, A. S., & Asfaw, S. L. (2019). Design and performance evaluation of solar
and biogas hybrid water supply system. Energy Reports, 5, 776-784.
Kumar, R., Samadder, S. R., & Singh, A. (2020). Modeling and automation of biogas-based hybrid
energy system for rural electrification. Renewable Energy, 146, 526-536.
Li, Y., Wen, X., Yan, C., & Zhang, S. (2018). A review on renewable energy powered water
pumping systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81(1), 1636-1643
Rahman, A. S., Kumar, A., Thakur, A., Sharma, A., & Kim, H. S. (2021). Recent advancements in
biogas purification and storage: A review. Renewable Energy, 170, 1603-1619.
Sharma, A., Bhagat, S. S., & Bhatti, M. S. (2019). Design and performance evaluation of a small-
scale biogas plant for rural energy supply. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and
Environmental Effects, 41(20), 2521-2536
Mengistu, M. G., Belay, A. S., & Asfaw, S. L. (2019). Design and performance evaluation of solar
and biogas hybrid water supply system. Energy Reports, 5, 776-784.
Rahman, A. S., Kumar, A., Thakur, A., Sharma, A., & Kim, H. S. (2021). Recent advancements in
biogas purification and storage: A review. Renewable Energy, 170, 1603-1619.
Kumar, R., Samadder, S. R., & Singh, A. (2020). Modeling and automation of biogas-based hybrid
energy system for rural electrification. Renewable Energy, 146, 526-536.
Li, Y., Wen, X., Yan, C., & Zhang, S. (2018). A review on renewable energy powered water
pumping systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81(1), 1636-1643.
Sharma, A., Bhagat, S. S., & Bhatti, M. S. (2019). Design and performance evaluation of a small-
scale biogas plant for rural energy supply. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and
Environmental Effects, 41(20), 2521-2536
Kumar, R., Samadder, S. R., & Singh, A. (2020). Modeling and automation of biogas-based hybrid
energy system for rural electrification. Renewable Energy, 146, 526-536.
Sharma, A., Bhagat, S. S., & Bhatti, M. S. (2019). Design and performance evaluation of a small-scale
biogas plant for rural energy supply. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental
Effects, 41(20), 2521-2536.
Rahman, A. S., Kumar, A., Thakur, A., Sharma, A., & Kim, H. S. (2021). Recent advancements in biogas
purification and storage: A review. Renewable Energy, 170, 1603-1619
Winrock International. (2017). Renewable Energy and Water Services (REWS) in Kenya: A Market
Assessment for Solar and Biogas-Powered Water Pumps.
Mwirigi, J. W., Njoroge, R., Kinyanjui, T., & Kogi-Makau, W. (2020). Feasibility Study of Solar-Biogas-
Powered Water Pumping for Irrigation in Rural Tanzania. In 2020 2nd International Conference on
Agriculture, Food Security and Safety (ICAFS). IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICAFS50459.2020.9149511
Ministry of Water and Environment (Uganda). (2018). National Water and Sanitation Sector
Performance Report 2017
Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). (2020). Uganda National Household Survey 2019/2020: Socio-
economic Module.
Gasana, J., & Cavendish, W. (2015). Renewable energy policy analysis in Uganda. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 530-539. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.009
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development (Uganda). (2019). Uganda's Renewable Energy Policy
2019
Ministry of Water and Environment (Uganda). (2018). National Water and Sanitation Sector
Performance Report 2017.
Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). (2020). Uganda National Household Survey 2019/2020: Socio-
economic Module.