You are on page 1of 12

Global Pharmaceutical Industry

One of the most crucial industries in the trade is medicine, it exerts the major

influence in the system of public health. Today, with the advent of the modern era, the

pharmaceutical industry has been taken aback and is now one of the most important and

significant industries in the world. Such the kind of an industry is for sure one of the crucial

issues of growth. The volume of the world pharmaceutical market will reach 887 billion

dollars in 2010 and will be approximately 1400 billion dollars in 2020 – such a growth is

58% in merely 10 years period.

Presently, the international health care and pharmaceutical business sphere is

witnessing a deep revolution as a result of the fusion of numerous factors which are playing

an increasingly crucial role in the changing scope of healthcare delivery, consumption, and

management. In this article, we would examine some of the major shifts at the science centre

landscape.

Environmental Forces Affecting the Global Pharmaceutical Industry

Healthcare organizations can use the PEST analysis framework to examine external

events and trends in four areas that frequently impact their business operations and

performance: political economic sociocultural and technological factors. In addition PESTEL

a PEST variation that offers more insights incorporates environmental and legal factors. In

Frank Aguilars groundbreaking book Scanning the Business Environment the idea of

evaluating these factors was first presented. Since then the concept has changed. Todays

healthcare organizations recognize the PESTEL analysis as a critical part of their strategic

planning process. The political economic social technical environmental and legal spheres all

play a significant role in shaping the dynamic and ever-changing environment in which the

pharmaceutical industry operates.


There is no denying the power of politics to influence business operations through

rules that control pricing drug approval processes and intellectual property rights.

Furthermore political unrest in some areas can impede market access and upset supply chains

which poses difficulties for multinational pharmaceutical companies. A strategy adjustment

that for instance makes allowances for decreased government subsidies or capitalizes on

increased government spending on healthcare may be necessary in response to a change in

tax laws. Alterations to employment law such as the 2016 legislation that affected the amount

of overtime required of employees may also require significant adjustments to staffing and

overtime requirements.

The path taken by the pharmaceutical industry is greatly influenced by economic

factors. Market demand and overall profitability are directly impacted by variables like GDP

growth healthcare spending exchange rate fluctuations and reimbursement policies. The

revenue streams and strategic planning of pharmaceutical companies may be impacted by

economic downturns if consumers spend less on healthcare. Previous research suggests that a

few economic factors could influence how well pharmaceutical companies do on the stock

market. Since pharmaceutical companies import more than 50% of their raw materials from

other nations currency rate fluctuations have a substantial impact on these businesses as a

result of their over-importing activities.

Regarding the financial market investing in the securities market is a compelling

option due to the low interest rate. Gordons equation directly links the stock price to

economic development which is another important factor in this regard. The asset portfolio

theory states that rising money volume increases demand for the stock which raises the price

of the stock. Various theories have been put forth regarding the impact of inflation on stock

prices because this relationship is not entirely explicit. All things considered an increasing
trend in inflation will typically impede economic growth over time and negatively impact

stock prices.

Patients involvement in the accomplishment of the medical act has evolved into a

modern necessity with broad and complex meanings that go beyond simply altering the

providers mindsets to include major changes to beneficiaries lifestyles consumption patterns

and prescription regimens. Change will be essential to the core reason for our existence—life

—as the daily process develops. Furthermore this will definitely be a hindrance to how the

relationship will balance the need for health. Health systems are being forced by structural

changes to move more quickly towards the future while taking current needs into account.

This is because the future strategy cannot be implemented without effective management and

marketing skills (Popa F Purcarea Th Purcarea VL Ratiu M. Marketingul serviciilor de

ingrijire a sanatatii 2007 Ed. ) Carlo Davila University. The demand for pharmaceutical

products is greatly impacted by social dynamics such as shifting healthcare awareness

changing lifestyle trends and changing demographics. I

ndustry participants face both opportunities and challenges as a result of changing

market dynamics brought about by factors like aging populations and a growing emphasis on

preventive healthcare. Furthermore the drug discovery development and distribution

processes have been completely transformed by technological advancements especially in the

biotechnology and precision medicine fields. This has changed the competitive landscape and

stimulated innovation in the sector.

Pharmaceutical firms are also adopting eco-friendly practices and sustainable

sourcing strategies to lessen their environmental impact as a result of growing environmental

concerns about sustainability waste management and energy consumption. As a significant

manufacturer of goods pharmaceutical companies have escaped scrutiny regarding their


environmental impact as Forbes notes in December 20211. Forbes continues by citing 2019

McMaster University research that shows that in 2015 the year of the Paris Agreement the

top 15 pharmaceutical companies released 55% more carbon dioxide equivalents per million

dollars of revenue than the automotive industry (Theuer 2021). Environmentally persistent

pharmaceutical pollutants (EPPPs) are non-biodegradable pharmaceutical waste products that

unintentionally affect everything from plants to wildlife. These pollutants have an impact on

the ground.

Finally legal frameworks including regulatory requirements patent laws and

intellectual property rights shape market entry strategies product development initiatives and

pricing decisions. Legal issues like patent lawsuits can have a big impact on a businesss

ability to operate and compete in the market.

Industry Forces Affecting the Global Pharmaceutical Industry

The pharmaceutical industry is a vibrant one with room for expansion and great profit

margins. Popular medications sell for billions of dollars each year. Still before a new drug is

released onto the market millions of dollars must be spent on research and development

(R&D) and testing. A significant amount of capital is wasted to produce a single profitable

product because most new projects are rejected by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA).

Due to the high degree of technical expertise needed to properly assess the viability of

potential new products as well as the ongoing prospects for existing FDA-approved drugs

individual investors in pharmaceutical stocks face a challenging task when it comes to

analysis. The most reliable stocks are those of large- and mega-cap firms that have substantial

R&D expenditures and a variety of products. Smaller businesses that make scientific

advancements however reap the biggest rewards.


Porters Five Forces analysis is a model that can be used to analyze an industry and a

companys approach within it. An industry is analyzed with respect to five competitive forces:

industry rivalry power of suppliers power of buyers threat of new entrants and availability of

substitutes. The dynamics of the industry and whether a particular business is well-positioned

to survive in it can be seen from how these five forces interact. Michael Porter a professor at

Harvard Business School developed Porters tool. It has grown to be one of the most well-

liked and respected business strategy tools since its release in 1979. In his article How

Competitive Forces Shape Strategy published in the Harvard Business Review Porter

acknowledged that companies enjoy closely monitoring their competitors. However he

advised executives to look beyond their competitors actions and consider the forces operating

in their broader business environment. These influences could be especially important in the

pharmaceutical sector. For instance analyzing the pharmaceutical industry using Porters Five

Forces framework sheds light on the competitive dynamics and difficulties that its

participants face.

First off high barriers to entry mean that the threat of new competitors is minimal.

Market entry is impeded by strict regulations significant research and development expenses

and intricate manufacturing procedures. Though these alternatives can compete on price and

reduce market share the introduction of biosimilars and generics poses a threat to well-

established pharmaceutical companies.

Furthermore pharmaceutical companies take into account the bargaining power of

their suppliers. Suppliers of equipment raw materials and active pharmaceutical ingredients

(APIs) have clout especially if they have access to special resources or technologies. The

efficiency of the supply chain and costs for pharmaceutical companies may be impacted by

the further consolidation of the supplier sector which increases their bargaining power.
Third buyers—which include governments insurance companies and healthcare

providers—have significant negotiating power. These organizations have sway over

discussions about prices and purchases particularly in areas where procurement is centralized.

In order to preserve market share pharmaceutical companies must develop competitive

pricing strategies and value-added services in response to the availability of generic

alternatives which further increases buyer power.

Fourth branded pharmaceuticals face difficulties from the threat of alternatives like

biosimilars and generic medications especially in markets with strict regulatory processes.

But replacements present less of a risk for new treatments that fill gaps in the medical field

because they might not be as effective or distinctive. Finally there is fierce competition

amongst firms in the pharmaceutical sector. Competition amongst businesses fighting for

market share is fueled by factors such as patent expirations pricing pressures and market

consolidation.

In this fiercely competitive environment differentiation through branding innovation

and strategic alliances becomes essential for maintaining competitive advantage. Furthermore

its critical to understand that different pharmaceutical industry sectors may be in different

stages of the life cycle. Even though the market for conventional small molecule drugs may

be reaching maturity industries like biotechnology and personalized medicine are expanding

and offer opportunities for new ideas and growth.

Pharmaceutical industry life cycle

The pharmaceutical industrys various sectors show differing stages of development

when viewed within the framework of the industry life cycle. For example generic

medications are generally in the mature stage. This industry is highly competitive and

sensitive to price because there are many generic substitutes for name-brand medications. For
this developed market segment to remain profitable the emphasis frequently switches to cost

reduction and operational efficiency.

Conversely the biotechnology sector is currently in the growth stage of the industry

life cycle. Biotechnology companies are at the forefront of developing novel therapies and

treatment modalities characterized by continuous innovation and substantial investment in

R&D. Developments in fields like gene editing cell therapy and precision medicine are

driving this growth opening up new markets and opportunities for disruptive technologies.

Because of this the biotechnology industry is highly competitive and relies on intellectual

property rights scientific know-how and strategic alliances to keep a step ahead of the

competition.

Organizational Structures in the International Ethical Medicine Sector. Five major

categories of industry participants each with unique roles and strategies can be used to group

strategic groups within the global ethical pharmaceutical sector.

1. Innovators: To develop new treatments and advance biotechnological

advancements these businesses place a high priority on research and development (RandD).

They heavily invest in the search for novel therapies to treat a wide range of illnesses and

ailments. When it comes to scientific knowledge and technical prowess innovators frequently

steer the pharmaceutical industry toward the forefront propelling the creation of novel drugs.

2. The goal of generics manufacturers who specialize in creating off-patent versions

of pharmaceuticals is to provide affordable substitutes for branded medications. They mainly

compete on price using economies of scale and productive production methods to provide

reasonably priced drugs. Generic medications contribute significantly to improving

healthcare affordability and accessibility even though they might not have the same level of

brand recognition as their branded counterparts.


3. Producers of biosimilars: These businesses create biologics that are substantially

similar to branded biopharmaceuticals as a follow-up. At a lower cost than their reference

products biosimilars provide efficacy and safety profiles that are comparable. Producers of

biosimilars hope to gain market share by providing more reasonably priced substitutes for

more costly biologics which will increase patient access to necessary treatments for ailments

like diabetes cancer and autoimmune diseases.

4. Contract Research Organizations (CROs): CROs offer outsourced services for

pharmacovigilance regulatory affairs and clinical trials among other areas of drug

development. CROs provide knowledge and resources to pharmaceutical companies in order

to expedite the drug development process lower expenses and minimize risks. Their services

are essential to the pharmaceutical industrys attempts to legally and efficiently introduce

novel treatments to the market.

5. Specialty Pharmaceutical Companies: Dedicated to treating uncommon diseases or

niche therapeutic areas specialty pharmaceutical companies create and distribute drugs for

particular patient demographics. These businesses frequently deal with unmet medical needs

in neurological oncology and orphan disease fields.

Specialty pharmaceutical companies focus on niche markets and are able to command

premium prices and build strong relationships with payers healthcare providers and patients.

Sanofis strategic decisions.

Sanofi a major participant in the global pharmaceutical market has taken a number of

initiatives to strategically adjust to the dynamics of the industry. First off to strengthen its

position in rare diseases and biotechnological breakthroughs Sanofi bought Genzyme a well-

known biotechnology company realizing the value of diversification. With this move Sanofi
was able to expand its portfolio with cutting-edge treatments that address unmet medical

needs and tap into niche markets.

Second Sanofi focused its resources on important therapeutic areas like diabetes

cancer and vaccines by selling off non-core businesses as part of its portfolio optimization

strategy. Sanofis goal in portfolio reduction was to focus on strategically important areas

where it could best use its resources and experience. Thirdly Sanofi set out on a global

expansion path in order to take advantage of emerging market opportunities. To increase its

market share and gain access to new patient populations it made strategic alliances and

investments in developing markets. By using this strategy Sanofi was able to broaden its

revenue sources and lessen its reliance on mature markets in addition to tapping into quickly

expanding markets. Sanofi also adopted a digital transformation strategy for all aspects of its

business using digital technologies for marketing patient engagement and research and

development. Through the use of analytics and digital tools Sanofi aims to provide

personalized healthcare solutions that improve patient outcomes increase efficiency and

accelerate innovation. Pressures to maintain prices and deal with patent expirations continued

even as Sanofi made strategic decisions to improve its competitiveness and meet changing

market demands. A thorough analysis of these initiatives results taking into account both

immediate benefits and long-term sustainability is necessary for success evaluation.

Notwithstanding obstacles Sanofis calculated moves demonstrate its proactive attitude to

adjusting to market conditions and setting itself up for long-term success.

Analysis and integration.

When it came to reducing the risks related to patent expirations and generic

competition Sanofis diversification strategy was crucial. Sanofi reduced its reliance on

conventional blockbuster medications facing patent cliffs by diversifying its product portfolio
through the acquisition of Genzyme and growing its footprint in rare diseases and

biotechnology. With more generic competitors entering the market Sanofi was able to

preserve market share and revenue streams thanks to this calculated gamble. Moreover

Sanofis position as an industry leader in innovation was strengthened by strategic acquisitions

and partnerships that made access to cutting-edge technologies and innovative therapies

easier.

Sanofi strengthened its competitive edge in the quickly changing pharmaceutical

market by collaborating with biotechnology companies and research institutes to obtain

access to novel treatment modalities and promising drug candidates which improved its

pipeline. Sanofi also made a strategic move to enter emerging markets in order to position the

business for long-term growth and to access new revenue streams. Sanofi became less

dependent on mature markets and expanded its geographic footprint by investing in areas

with expanding healthcare infrastructure and growing demand for pharmaceutical products.

This increased Sanofis resilience to economic uncertainties and market fluctuations.

Furthermore Sanofis brand reputation and competitiveness in the global pharmaceutical

market have been enhanced by its unwavering focus on innovation and patient-centricity.

Sanofi set itself apart from competitors and strengthened its relationships with

patients healthcare providers and other stakeholders by putting a priority on research and

development efforts aimed at addressing unmet medical needs and improving patient

outcomes. This helped the company maintain its reputation as a reliable and progressive

pharmaceutical company.

Conclusion
In summary to develop successful strategies and prosper in a highly competitive

environment pharmaceutical companies must possess a thorough understanding of industry

dynamics environmental factors and strategic alliances.

References

Pharmaceutical market volume. Available from www.imshealth.com.

You might also like