You are on page 1of 2

Introduction very specifically.

It originates from the adaptive


immune system of bacteria against viruses and
Over 250 million people worldwide are chronically plasmids. When a virus enters a bacterium, it will
infected by the hepatitis B virus (HBV). Symptoms insert its own DNA in the host DNA for further
of HBV are fatigue, fever, nausea, joint pain, replication. Some bacteria are able to copy a short
abdominal pain and yellowing of the skin and eyes. sequence of the virus’s DNA (target sequence), to
Prolonged HBV infection can lead to severe liver serve as a detection mechanism for future viral
failure, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular liver cancer. It infections. The complex in which the detection
can be fatal when not treated. Up to 600.000 mechanism operates is called CRISPR. The CRISPR
people a year are likely to die from a hepatitis B complex is attached to the nuclease Cas9. In short,
infection (Dienstag et al., 2008). CRISPR is able to recognize the viral DNA through
HBV is a double-stranded DNA virus of the its target sequence and Cas9, in turn, is able to
Hepadnaviridae family. The virus binds to the destroy the viral DNA by breaking the double helix.
hepatocyte membrane in the liver after which the Genome engineering has made it possible to
HBV core is being released in the cytoplasm and design target sequences of CRISPR, which is called
subsequently transported to the nucleus where it guide RNA (gRNA). So, in principle any desired
will form a covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) DNA sequence can be recognized and cleaved by
(figure 1). This cccDNA is crucial for the CRISPR-Cas9. Moreover, extra nucleotides can be
persistence of the infection, since it serves as a inserted to CRISPR-Cas9 and accordingly built in
template for transcription of all viral genomes and into the cell’s genome. Therefore CRISPR-Cas9 can
sub-genomes. be applied to transform DNA that causes life
threatening diseases.
In this study we want to investigate the
application of CRISPR-Cas9 in the treatment of
hepatitis B by direct targeting and cleavage of HBV
cccDNA. We hypothesize that HBV can be
suppressed by CRISPR-Cas9 through cleavage of
the HBV genome. Hence, we first examine the
efficiency of several gRNAs in HBV infected cell
lines by measuring an important indicator for viral
expression and replication in the medium,
specifically the secretion of surface antigen HBsAg.
Next, we sought to evaluate the antiviral effect of
the most effective gRNAs in a mouse model of
Figure 1. Schematic overview of the HBV life cycle. HBV, to ensure that it functions properly in the
hepatocytes of a living organism. Finally, we
Treatment of hepatitis B is currently based on wanted to examine the long-term anti-HBV effect
inhibiting viral replication by acting on post- of CRISPR-Cas9 in a special cell line that mimics
transcriptionally processes (Schlomai & Rice, the HBV life cycle components and consequently
2014). Consequently, cccDNA is not targetted, so it produces the infectious virus (Sells et al., 1987).
remains stable and persists in the hepatocyte’s Therefore, we measured the amount of cccDNA at
nucleus. Hence, medication must be taken day 24 and 34 after treatment. In all experiments
chronically to prevent further viral outbreaks. we expect CRISPR-Cas9 to cause a decrease in
Infected liver cells may contain up to 50 cccDNA HBV expression compared to control conditions.
molecules (Balsano et al., 2008), therefore agents
acting directly on cccDNA might be more desirable Materials and Methods
and possibly even curative. For example, specific
nucleases that are able to break the viruses CRISPR-Cas9 design and validation
double-stranded DNA, without damaging the host Whole-genome sequences from HBV were inquired
genomic DNA, would be ideal for this purpose. from the GenBank sequence database to
The recently developed CRISPR-Cas9 determine several target sequences. We made use
technology makes it possible to manipulate DNA of a CRISPR online design tool Dharmacon
(https://horizondiscovery.com/en/resources/featur Hydrodynamic injection of
ed-articles/dharmacon-editr-crispr-cas9-gene- 1.3x WT HBV and Cas9/gRNA
engineering-system) to generate and order four
different gRNAs (table 1), that were able to target
the HBV DNA at different locations. To evaluate the
efficiency of the gRNA’s we added the four
different designs of CRISPR-Cas9 to HBV infected
cell lines, that were maintained in DMEM and 10%
calf serum. We used mismatching target
sequences as control. To determine the efficiency
Draw blood to analyze
of the gRNA after 72 hours, we measured an
serum virus load
indicator of HBV genomic expression in the
Figure 2. Schematic overview of in vivo experiment.
medium of the cell lines, namely hepatitis B
surface antigen (HBsAg). The two most efficient
Statistical analyses
gRNAs were used for follow-up experiments.
All analyses were performed in SPSS 14.0.
Table 1. Sequences of the manufactured gRNAs. Comparisons between two groups were analyzed
by Students t-test. Comparisons among more
groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed
by Tukey’s post-hoc test to compare between two
groups.

Anti-HBV effect in vivo


We used a mouse model of HBV to evaluate the
anti-viral effect of CRISPR-Cas9 in vivo. NRG mice
were administered 15 µg 1,3xHBV plasmid and 20
µg CRISPR-Cas9 through tail vain hydrodynamic
injection in 7-9 seconds (figure 2). We took
measures on HBV titer in a blood sample to
determine the anti-viral effects of CRISPR-Cas9 at
day 2 and 4 post injection. Mismatching target
sequences were used as control. Mice were
obtained from Jackson laboratory and were housed
in an accredited facility with ad libitum access to
food and water. All animal protocols were
approved by the University of Massachusetts.

Long term anti-HBV effect


For this experiment we used the HepG2.2.15
hepatoblastoma cell line, which contains HBV
cccDNA and is able to produce infectious virions. In
contrast to other cell lines, HepG2.2.15 is ideal for
taking measures of cccDNA. We measured the
effect of CRISPR-Cas9 mediated cleavage on the
abundance of cccDNA in cells after 24 and 34 days.
Control constructs were made of mismatching
target sequences.

You might also like