Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Encyclopedia
0 0 0
Upload a video for this entry
There are a number of different maze solving algorithms, that is, automated methods for the solving of mazes.
The random mouse, wall follower, Pledge, and Trémaux's algorithms are designed to be used inside the maze by
a traveler with no prior knowledge of the maze, whereas the dead-end filling and shortest path algorithms are
designed to be used by a person or computer program that can see the whole maze at once. Mazes containing
Information
no loops are known as "simply connected", or "perfect" mazes, and are equivalent to a tree in graph theory. Thus
many maze solving algorithms are closely related to graph theory. Intuitively, if one pulled and stretched out the Subjects: Mathematics, Applied
paths in the maze in the proper way, the result could be made to resemble a tree. Contributor : HandWiki Liu
View Times: 320
maze solving algorithms shortest path algorithms maze solving
Entry Collection: HandWiki
Revisions: 3 times (View History)
Update Date: 08 Nov 2022
Solution to above maze. The solution is the boundary between the connected components of the wall of the
maze, each represented by a different color. https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?curid=1584916
The best-known rule for traversing mazes is the wall follower, also known as either the left-hand rule or the right-
hand rule. If the maze is simply connected, that is, all its walls are connected together or to the maze's outer
boundary, then by keeping one hand in contact with one wall of the maze the solver is guaranteed not to get lost
and will reach a different exit if there is one; otherwise, the algorithm will return to the entrance having traversed
every corridor next to that connected section of walls at least once.
Another perspective into why wall following works is topological. If the walls are connected, then they may be
deformed into a loop or circle.[1] Then wall following reduces to walking around a circle from start to finish. To
further this idea, notice that by grouping together connected components of the maze walls, the boundaries
between these are precisely the solutions, even if there is more than one solution (see figures on the right).
If the maze is not simply-connected (i.e. if the start or endpoints are in the center of the structure surrounded by
passage loops, or the pathways cross over and under each other and such parts of the solution path are
surrounded by passage loops), this method will not reach the goal.
Another concern is that care should be taken to begin wall-following at the entrance to the maze. If the maze is
not simply-connected and one begins wall-following at an arbitrary point inside the maze, one could find
themselves trapped along a separate wall that loops around on itself and containing no entrances or exits. Should
it be the case that wall-following begins late, attempt to mark the position in which wall-following began. Because
wall-following will always lead you back to where you started, if you come across your starting point a second
time, you can conclude the maze is not simply-connected, and you should switch to an alternative wall not yet
followed. See the Pledge Algorithm, below, for an alternative methodology.
3. Pledge Algorithm
Disjoint mazes can be solved with the wall follower method, so long as the entrance and exit to the maze are on
the outer walls of the maze. If however, the solver starts inside the maze, it might be on a section disjoint from the
exit, and wall followers will continually go around their ring. The Pledge algorithm (named after Jon Pledge of
Exeter) can solve this problem.[2][3]
The Pledge algorithm, designed to circumvent obstacles, requires an arbitrarily chosen direction to go toward,
which will be preferential. When an obstacle is met, one hand (say the right hand) is kept along the obstacle while
the angles turned are counted (clockwise turn is positive, counter-clockwise turn is negative). When the solver is
facing the original preferential direction again, and the angular sum of the turns made is 0, the solver leaves the
obstacle and continues moving in its original direction.
The hand is removed from the wall only when both "sum of turns made" and "current heading" are at zero. This
allows the algorithm to avoid traps shaped like an upper case letter "G". Assuming the algorithm turns left at the
first wall, one gets turned around a full 360 degrees by the walls. An algorithm that only keeps track of "current
heading" leads into an infinite loop as it leaves the lower rightmost wall heading left and runs into the curved
section on the left hand side again. The Pledge algorithm does not leave the rightmost wall due to the "sum of
turns made" not being zero at that point (note 360 degrees is not equal to 0 degrees). It follows the wall all the
way around, finally leaving it heading left outside and just underneath the letter shape.
This algorithm allows a person with a compass to find their way from any point inside to an outer exit of any finite
two-dimensional maze, regardless of the initial position of the solver. However, this algorithm will not work in
doing the reverse, namely finding the way from an entrance on the outside of a maze to some end goal within it.
4. Trémaux's Algorithm
https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?curid=1359400
Trémaux's algorithm. The large green dot shows the current position, the small blue dots show single marks on
paths, and the red crosses show double marks. Once the exit is found, the route is traced through the singly-
marked paths.
Trémaux's algorithm, invented by Charles Pierre Trémaux,[4] is an efficient method to find the way out of a maze
that requires drawing lines on the floor to mark a path, and is guaranteed to work for all mazes that have well-
defined passages,[5] but it is not guaranteed to find the shortest route.
A path from a junction is either unvisited, marked once or marked twice. The algorithm works according to the
following rules:
Mark each path once, when you follow it. The marks need to be visible at both ends of the path. Therefore, if
they are being made as physical marks, rather than stored as part of a computer algorithm, the same mark
should be made at both ends of the path.
Never enter a path which has two marks on it.
If you arrive at a junction that has no marks (except possibly for the one on the path by which you entered),
choose an arbitrary unmarked path, follow it, and mark it.
Otherwise:
If the path you came in on has only one mark, turn around and return along that path, marking it again. In
particular this case should occur whenever you reach a dead end.
If not, choose arbitrarily one of the remaining paths with the fewest marks (zero if possible, else one), follow
that path, and mark it.
The "turn around and return" rule effectively transforms any maze with loops into a simply connected one;
whenever we find a path that would close a loop, we treat it as a dead end and return. Without this rule, it is
possible to cut off one's access to still-unexplored parts of a maze if, instead of turning back, we arbitrarily follow
another path.
When you finally reach the solution, paths marked exactly once will indicate a way back to the start. If there is no
exit, this method will take you back to the start where all paths are marked twice. In this case each path is walked
down exactly twice, once in each direction. The resulting walk is called a bidirectional double-tracing.[6]
Essentially, this algorithm, which was discovered in the 19th century, has been used about a hundred years later
as depth-first search.[7][8]
5. Dead-end Filling
Feedback
Dead-end filling is an algorithm for solving mazes that fills all dead ends, leaving only the correct ways unfilled. It
can be used for solving mazes on paper or with a computer program, but it is not useful to a person inside an
unknown maze since this method looks at the entire maze at once. The method is to 1) find all of the dead-ends
in the maze, and then 2) "fill in" the path from each dead-end until the first junction is met. Note that some
passages won't become parts of dead end passages until other dead ends are removed first. A video of dead-end
filling in action can be seen here: [1][2].
Dead-end filling cannot accidentally "cut off" the start from the finish since each step of the process preserves the
topology of the maze. Furthermore, the process won't stop "too soon" since the end result cannot contain any
dead-ends. Thus if dead-end filling is done on a perfect maze (maze with no loops), then only the solution will
remain. If it is done on a partially braid maze (maze with some loops), then every possible solution will remain but
nothing more. [3]
6. Recursive Algorithm
If given an omniscient view of the maze, a simple recursive algorithm can tell one how to get to the end. The
algorithm will be given a starting X and Y value. If the X and Y values are not on a wall, the method will call itself
with all adjacent X and Y values, making sure that it did not already use those X and Y values before. If the X and
Y values are those of the end location, it will save all the previous instances of the method as the correct path.
Here is a sample code in Java:
7. Maze-routing Algorithm
[9]
The maze-routing algorithm is a low overhead method to find the way between any two locations of the maze.
The algorithm is initially proposed for chip multiprocessors (CMPs) domain and guarantees to work for any grid-
based maze. In addition to finding paths between two location of the grid (maze), the algorithm can detect when
there is no path between the source and destination. Also, the algorithm is to be used by an inside traveler with
no prior knowledge of the maze with fixed memory complexity regardless of the maze size; requiring 4 variables
in total for finding the path and detecting the unreachable locations. Nevertheless, the algorithm is not to find the
shortest path.
Maze-routing algorithm uses the notion of Manhattan distance (MD) and relies on the property of grids that the
MD increments/decrements exactly by 1 when moving from one location to any 4 neighboring locations. Here is
the pseudocode without the capability to detect unreachable locations.
Point src, dst;// Source and destination coordinates // cur also indicates the
coordinates of the current location int MD_best = MD(src, dst);// It stores the
closest MD we ever had to dst // A productive path is the one that makes our MD
to dst smaller while (cur != dst) { if (there exists a productive path) { Take
the productive path; } else { MD_best = MD(cur, dst); Imagine a line between cur
and dst; Take the first path in the left/right of the line; // The left/right
selection affects the following hand rule while (MD(cur, dst) != MD_best ||
there does not exist a productive path) { Follow the right-hand/left-hand rule;
// The opposite of the selected side of the line } }
A maze with many solutions and no dead-ends, where it may be useful to find the shortest path.
https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?curid=1730199
When a maze has multiple solutions, the solver may want to find the shortest path from start to finish. There are
several algorithms to find shortest paths, most of them coming from graph theory. One such algorithm finds the
shortest path by implementing a breadth-first search, while another, the A* algorithm, uses a heuristic technique.
The breadth-first search algorithm uses a queue to visit cells in increasing distance order from the start until the
finish is reached. Each visited cell needs to keep track of its distance from the start or which adjacent cell nearer
to the start caused it to be added to the queue. When the finish location is found, follow the path of cells
backwards to the start, which is the shortest path. The breadth-first search in its simplest form has its limitations,
like finding the shortest path in weighted graphs.
References
1. Maze Transformed on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIBwiGrUgzc
2. Abelson; diSessa (1980), Turtle Geometry: the computer as a medium for exploring mathematics, https://books
.google.com/books?id=3geYp44hJVcC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=%22Pledge%20algorithm%20%22
&f=false
3. Seymour Papert, "Uses of Technology to Enhance Education", MIT Artificial Intelligence Memo No. 298, June
1973 ftp://publications.ai.mit.edu/ai-publications/pdf/AIM-298.pdf
4. Public conference, December 2, 2010 – by professor Jean Pelletier-Thibert in Academie de Macon (Burgundy
– France) – (Abstract published in the Annals academic, March 2011 – ISSN 0980-6032) Charles Tremaux (° 1
859 – † 1882) Ecole Polytechnique of Paris (X:1876), French engineer of the telegraph
6. H. Fleischner: Eulerian Graphs and related Topics. In: Annals of Discrete Mathematics No. 50 Part 1 Volume 2,
1991, page X20.
7. Even, Shimon (2011), Graph Algorithms (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–48, ISBN 978-0-521-7
3653-4, https://books.google.com/books?id=m3QTSMYm5rkC&pg=PA46 .
8. Sedgewick, Robert (2002), Algorithms in C++: Graph Algorithms (3rd ed.), Pearson Education, ISBN 978-0-20
1-36118-6 .
9. Fattah, Mohammad; et, al. (2015-09-28). "A Low-Overhead, Fully-Distributed, Guaranteed-Delivery Routing Al
gorithm for Faulty Network-on-Chips". NOCS '15 Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Networks
-on-Chip. doi:10.1145/2786572.2786591. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2786591.
Related Entries
The Radial Arm Maze (RAM), developed by Olton and Samuelson (1976) and quickly adapted in humans, is a
high ecological spatial task, firstly used in a real environment and subsequently in the virtual one.
Keywords: human navigation; virtual reality; behavioral task; spatial abilities; large-scale task
The JPS algorithm is a pathfinding algorithm that uses pruned neighbor rules as the search direction of nodes
and the position of forced neighbors as the judgment of jump points.
In mathematical optimization and computer science, heuristic (from Greek εὑρίσκω "I find, discover") is a
technique designed for solving a problem more quickly when classic methods are too slow, or for finding
…
approximate solution when classic methodssearch
fail to find any exact solution. This is achieved by trading optimality,
Keywords: approximate solution; optimality; algorithms
completeness, accuracy, or precision for speed. In a way, it can be considered a shortcut. A heuristic function,
also simply called a heuristic, is a function that ranks alternatives in search algorithms at each branching step
©Text
based isonavailable under
available the terms
information toand conditions
decide which of the Creative
branch Commons-Attribution
to follow. ShareAlike
For example, it may (CC BY-SA)
approximate the exact
license;
solution.additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
© 2023 Encyclopedia is subsidized by MDPI. Disclaimer Terms and Conditions Private Policy