4.

The engagement between science and Christianity has undergone a significant transformation in recent
times, moving away from an attitude of opposition to one of constructive interaction and dialogue. This
shift is characterized by mutual recognition of each other's capabilities and importance, as well as
mutual respect and openness. He mentioned an example of Fritjof Capra, saying: “Science does not
need religion. Religion does not need science. But humans need both.” Scientists and theologians alike
have demonstrated a readiness to listen to each other's perspectives, fostering a positive and
constructive atmosphere. This change has been influenced by various factors, including developments in
science itself, such as the humbling experience brought about by discoveries in quantum theory and
relativity, which highlighted the limitations and incompleteness of scientific knowledge. Additionally, the
influence of certain scientists who espoused a religious worldview, like Einstein and Francis Collins, has
contributed to this shift in attitude. He put forward the discussion of Louis de Broglie stated that, “Let us
add that this increased body awaits a supplement of the soul and that the mechanism demands a
mysticism.” Moreover, positive developments within the Catholic Church, exemplified by the Second
Vatican Council and the leadership of figures like Pope John Paul II, have played a crucial role in fostering
a warm and friendly relationship between science and religion. Institutions and initiatives dedicated to
promoting dialogue between science and theology have also emerged, further facilitating this
constructive engagement.

Despite this progress, challenges remain, particularly in reconciling certain scientific findings with
traditional religious beliefs and moral values. Recent advancements in fields such as cosmology, “
Challenge to the biblical idea of creation.” genetics, and neuroscience pose challenges to biblical
interpretations of human nature, and the soul. Moreover, the emergence of dynamic worldviews rooted
in evolution and the ethical implications of artificial intelligence present additional areas of tension. I
would like to put forward what he stated it as an approach in finding the solutions pertaining the
tension, by noting that, “the positive approach means that these challenges are looked upon not as
attacks, but as opportunities to learn better and progress more.” However, there is a growing
recognition of the need for constructive dialogue between science and religion to address these
challenges effectively. This dialogue is essential for harnessing the potential of scientific advancements
for the benefit of humanity while ensuring that ethical considerations and moral values are upheld.
Robert Boyle (1627–1691): Prominent scientist and theologian who argued that “the study of science
could improve glorification of God.” As the world becomes increasingly reliant on science and
technology, the integration of religious insights and values into the discourse surrounding these
developments becomes not just an option but a moral obligation to ensure the holistic well-being of
individuals and society as a whole.