Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-022-00592-2
ORIGINAL PAPER
Abstract
Investigation on the dynamic characteristics of bridges for structural condition assessment is challenging when nonlinear
breathing cracks in the bridge and nonstationary vehicle-bridge interaction are considered. Variational mode decomposition
(VMD) method has been widely used to analyze the nonlinear time-series, but its performance is highly dependent on the
parameter setting, i.e., the number of modes and the penalty factor. A new method based on the parameter optimization VMD
is proposed to extract the nonlinear dynamic characteristics from responses of bridge under moving vehicle loads in this paper.
The Chicken Swarm Optimization algorithm is used to optimize the VMD parameters to improve the decomposition and
characterization. A general breathing crack model is introduced to simulate the bridge damage. The acceleration response of
bridge considering the cracks is decomposed by the proposed method. The instantaneous frequency (IF) is then obtained from
the time–frequency representation of the bridge-related response component using the ridge detection. Numerical simulations
are performed to investigate the effect of the crack location and extent on the IFs for structural damage detection. The effect of
the vehicle–bridge interaction is also discussed. The method is further verified using the laboratory experimental results of a
concrete bridge model under the vehicle load. The nonstationary and nonlinear dynamic properties of the bridge model with
different damage scenarios are successfully identified. The results show that the extracted IF clearly reveals the behaviour of
breathing crack that can be a potential indicator of the damage in the bridge.
123
Vol.:(0123456789)
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
Bovsunovsky and Surace [11] presented a state-of-the-art used to analyze the nonstationary dynamic responses of
review to illustrate the nonlinear effects caused by a breath- vehicle-bridge interaction dynamic system, as well as the
ing crack. While the studies of nonlinear behaviour at free improved empirical wavelet transform [28] and modified
and resonant vibrations of beams [9, 12] or when beam is S-transform reassignment [29]. Due to the solid mathemati-
subjected to moving masses [13, 14] are extensive, studies cal theoretical foundation compared to the abovementioned
that deal with the nonstationary and nonlinear VBI prob- methods, variational mode decomposition (VMD) methods
lems under the effect of breathing cracks are relatively less have been proved to be effective in analyzing the nonsta-
reported. Law and Zhu [15] proposed to use a crack model tionary and nonlinear dynamic responses [30, 31]. The
as presented in [16] to express the degradation in the flex- efficacy and accuracy of VMD based method compared
ural rigidity to study the dynamic responses of a cracked to EMD have been demonstrated in [32, 33]. Despite of
bridge. The opening/closing behaviour was modelled by its wide applications, the performance of VMD heavily
multiplying a time-dependent parameter to the degradation depends on the proper parameter setting, i.e., the number
damage variable [17]. Nguyen [18] compared the open and of modes and the quadratic penalty factor. Some attempts
breathing crack detection of a beam-like bridge by analyz- have been made to optimize the parameters using differ-
ing the displacement response of the bridge under a mov- ent optimization algorithms, such as the particle swarm
ing vehicle. Yin et al. [19] studied the dynamic behaviour optimization (PSO) [34]. The chicken swarm optimization
of a bridge with multi-cracks under moving vehicles. The (CSO) algorithm can be used to solve the optimization
massless rotational spring was adopted to describe the local effectively in terms of optimization accuracy, robustness
flexibility induced by a crack on the bridge. From the above and conciseness [35]. It has been confirmed that CSO
studies, it is observed that the presence of crack results in outperforms many nature-inspired algorithms like PSO
high deflections and alters beam response patterns. Moreover, and genetic algorithm in solving a wide range of standard
to appropriately model the crack influence on the stiffness benchmark and real-life problems [36, 37]. Therefore, a
of mechanical systems, the most common way was to use novel improved VMD method with parameter-optimized
a cracked element with additional compliance determined by CSO (CSO-VMD) is proposed to study the nonlinear
using the energy release rate method based on the fracture dynamic characteristics of cracked bridges.
mechanics [11, 20]. The objective of this study is to identify the nonlinear
Some experiential studies have been conducted to explore characteristics of the cracked bridge under moving vehicle
the nonstationary vibrations of the bridge under moving loads. A cracked finite element is developed by consider-
vehicles. Pakrashi et al. [21] presented an experimental ing an overall additional flexibility to the flexibility matrix
study on the evolution of a crack in a phenolic beam using of intact element [38] based on the fracture mechanics. The
beam–vehicle interaction responses. An open crack model breathing crack switching between being open and closed
was introduced by notching in the lower section of the beam. states is considered according to the curvature at the crack
McGetrick [22] constructed a scaled vehicle–bridge inter- location. A novel CSO-VMD method integrated with ridge
action model in the laboratory. Damage was simulated via detection technique is proposed for IF identification of the
rectangular saw-cuts in the flanges of the steel I-beam. The nonlinear and/or nonstationary bridge response of the VBI
bridge was modelled as a steel beam with rectangular cross- system. The identified IFs are analyzed for possible crack
section and the local damage was simulated as the additional detection. Moreover, the experimental study of a VBI model
mass put on the beam [23]. Cantero et al. [24] explored the is conducted in the laboratory where the crack damages are
bridge frequency evolution during the passage of vehicles introduced to the concrete bridge model. It is not only to
using a scaled laboratory model, where an I-section steel validate the proposed analytical method, but also to provide
beam was adopted. Some field VBI experimental tests were information of practical engineering relevance for analyzing
also conducted for the bridge modal identification and con- the structural nonlinear properties under a moving vehicle.
dition inspection [25, 26]. However, these experimental The rest of paper is organized as followings: Sect. 2 intro-
investigations did not consider the nonlinear effects due to duces a generic bridge model under moving loads consider-
breathing cracks. ing the nonlinear dynamic behaviour due to the breathing
A key feature of the nonlinear behaviour of cracked cracks; Sect. 3 presents the algorithm for the nonlinear char-
bridge subjected to moving vehicle load is an instantaneous acteristic identification of the bridge; Sect. 4 conducts the
change of the bridge stiffness at crack opening and closing. numerical analysis to demonstrate the effectiveness of the
To characterize the nonlinear behaviour of a bridge sub- proposed method in revealing the nonlinear characteristics
jected to moving vehicle loads, a variety of methods have of bridge and localizing the cracks. The implementation of
been developed to examine the instantaneous frequency an experimental verification on nonlinear characteristics of a
(IF) of the bridge under moving loads. Wavelet analysis typical Tee-beam under the model vehicle load is discussed
[18] and empirical mode decomposition (EMD) [27] were in Sect. 5. Finally, the conclusions are drawn in Sect. 6.
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
2.2 Bridge cracked element models The dimensionless forms can be expressed as follows (by
setting x = a∕h):
The local structural damage of the bridge is usually consid- [ ]
36Lc2 a∕h a∕h
ered as the reduction of flexural stiffness. An overall flex-
h2 ∫ ∫
�
F(1, 1) = c11 E b = 2𝜋 xF22 (x)dx + xFII2 (x)dx ,
ibility matrix is especially appropriate for the analysis of a 0 0
presented as below. and, F(2, 2) = c22 E� bh2 = F(1, 2); c21 = c12 . The entries of
the overall additional flexibility matrix cij can be obtained
2.2.1 Stiffness matrix of an open cracked element using least squares best-fitted formulas of F(1, 1) and F(2, 2).
The overall
[ additional
] flexibility matrix can be expressed
c11 c12
For a rectangular cross-sectional beam element with height as Covl = . The total flexibility matrix of the
c21 c22
h, width b and length Le, the additional strain energy due
cracked beam element can now be obtained by:
to the existence of the crack considering only the bending
deformation can be expressed as [38] [ L3 Le 2
]
e
+ c11 2EI + c12
( )2 Ctot = Cintact + Covl = L 23EI
Le
, (9)
a a KI2 + KI3 + KII2 2
e
+ c + c
∫ ∫
21 22
Πc = b Wda = b da, (2) 2EI EI
E�
0 0
where Cintact is the flexibility matrix of the intact beam ele-
where Πc is the additional strain energy due to the crack; a ment. The stiffness matrix of a cracked beam element can
is the total depth of the crack; W is the strain energy release be obtained as follows:
rate function; E� = E is the Young’s modulus for plane stress
(10)
−1 T
Kc = LCtot L ,
problem and E� = E∕(1 − 𝜇2 ) for plane strain problem; 𝜇 is
Poisson’s ratio; KI2, KII2 and KI3 are the stress intensity fac- ( )T
−1 −Le 1 0
tors due to shear force V and bending moment M at the right where L = .
0 −1 0 1
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
2.2.2 Stiffness matrix of a breathing cracked element The global matrix of all the common beam elements
𝐊com can be assembled according to the DOFs of each
A breathing cracked element depending on the curvature of element with Ke . The entries corresponding to the DOFs
the beam at the crack location is use to build the stiffness of cracked elements in 𝐊com are zeros. Assuming that the
matrix [14, 18]. The stiffness can be expressed as a continu- number of cracked beam elements is Nc, the global stiffness
ous function as follows: of the bridge 𝐊b can be written as:
[N ]
1 [ ] [ ] ∑ c
Kb = Ke + ( )[ d��
],
(11) 𝐊b NN×NN = 𝐊com NN×NN + T
𝐀i Kbi 𝐀i , (13)
2 Kc − Ke 1 + d��max i=1 NN×NN
continues until the difference between the two last maxi- ẍ b (t) = ui (t), (15)
mum curvatures becomes less than a given tolerance value. i=1
w h e re K i s t h e n u m b e r o f t h e c o mp o n e n t s
{ui (t), i = 1, 2, … K}. The VMD can decompose the bridge
2.2.3 The global stiffness matrix of the cracked bridge response into components with an adaptive filter. The
decomposition can be considered as a constrained vari-
The global stiffness matrix of the cracked bridge can be ational problem with the corresponding objective function
formed by assembling the stiffness matrices of common expressed as
intact beam elements and the cracked elements. The stiff- �K �
�� � �
ness matrix of the common intact beam element Ke can be � � j
2
fobj = min ‖𝜕t 𝛿(t) + ∗ ui (t) e−j𝜔i t
‖ ,
derived as: 𝜋t 2
{ui (t)}{𝜔i } i=1
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
By introducing the quadratic penalty factor α and multi- argfACE (K, 𝛼) argmin( C+E )
plication operator λ , the optimization objective function of = 2 . (22)
K, 𝛼 K, 𝛼
optimization problem in Eq. (16) can be transferred into an
unconstrained optimization problem as follows:
�� � � 3.3 IF identification based on chicken swarm
�� � � � � ∑
K
j 2 optimization for VMD
L ui (t) , 𝜔̄ i , 𝜆 = 𝛼 𝜕t 𝛿(t) + 𝜋t
∗ ui (t) e−j𝜔̄ i t 2
i=1
∑
K
∑
K
3.3.1 CSO
+̈xb (t) − ui (t)22 + 𝜆(t), ẍ b (t) − ui (t).
i=1 i=1
(17) The chicken swarm optimization algorithm mimics the hierar-
Then, the alternate direction method of multipliers chal order and behaviors of searching food in the chicken
approach [30, 39] is used to solve the variational problem swarm. The whole chicken swarm is divided into three groups
in Eq. (17). The complete optimization problem is divided of chickens, i.e., rooster, hen, and chick. When the CSO algo-
into a sequence of iterative sub-optimization problems. rithm solves the optimization problem of Eq. (22), each chicken
represents a feasible solution and different chickens follow dif-
3.2 Parameter optimization for VMD ferent optimization strategies. In performing CSO algorithm,
assume that the total population number of chickens is N,
It is generally recognized that the component number K and among which there are Nr roosters, Nc chicks, Nh hens, and the
the penalty factor 𝛼 have a significant impact on the per- number of mother hens is Nm. The chickens are arranged in
formance of VMD. Finding the optimal values of these two rising order according to their individual fitness values.
variables are essential. CSO is to be used for searching the The Nr chickens in front with the best fitness are defined as
optimal values of K and 𝛼 with a fitness function which is roosters, and the Nc chickens at last with the worst fitness values
made up of the average of both correlation coefficient and are called chicks. The remaining Nh (= N − Nr − Nc) chickens in
energy loss coefficient [40]. It is described as follows: the middle are treated as hens, and the mother hens are ran-
domly selected from the hens. Each virtual chicken is a vector
C+E consisting of D elements, where D denotes the dimension of
fACE (K, 𝛼) = , (18)
2 the solution space (control variables), i.e. D = 2 in this study.
where fACE (K, 𝛼) is the fitness function regarding the param- Let xi,j
t
denotes the position of the i-th chicken in the j-
eters of VMD; C indicates the maximum correlation coef- th dimension of solution space in the t-th iteration, where
ficient between all modes, and E denotes the energy loss i ∈ (1, 2, … ., N), j ∈ (1, … ., D), t ∈ (1, 2, … , Tmax ); Tmax is
coefficient. the maximal iterative number.
j
The position update formula of different types of chickens
C = max({Ci }) (19) in each iteration is as follows [36, 37].
) if fi ≤ fk
where Ci is the set of all correlation coefficients in a VMD
j {
i, k ∈ [1, N], k ≠ i
1, (
result; ui and uj are two different modes, and ui and uj are 2
𝜎 = fk −fi
exp , otherwise,
the mean of ui and uj , respectively. As the energy loss coef- |fi |+𝜀
ficient, E is defined as the ratio of the energy of the decom- (24)
position residual to the energy of the original signal, which where t+1
xi,j is
the position of j-th dimension of a chicken
can be calculated by the following formula: i in t + 1 iteration; xi,j
t,best
is the position of the i-th
∑N ∑M 2 chicken in t-th iteration, which corresponds to the
[̈xb (t) − i=1 ui (t)]
E= t=1
(21) smallest fitness value; randn(0, 𝜎 2 ) is a random number
∑N ,
[̈x
t=1 b (t)]
2
of Gaussian distribution whose variance is 𝜎 2 ; 𝜀 is
infinitesimal to avoid zero-division-error; k is a roost-
where ẍ b (t) is the original signal; N is the length of the signal er’s index, randomly selected from the rooster’s group;
data, and M is the number of modes. fi and fk are the fitness values of roosters i and k,
Therefore, the parameter optimization of VMD for a signal respectively.
can be described as follows: (2) The position updating of hens can be expressed as
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
( )
t+1 t,best t t Eq. (22). If the number of iteration time t is divisible by
xi,j =xi,j + S1 ∗ Rand ∗ xr1,j − xi,j
( ) G, the hierarchical order will be updated.
(25)
t
+ S2 ∗ Rand ∗ xr2,j t
− xi,j (3) Update the positions and recalculate the fitness values,
respectively: roosters, hens, and chicks update their
positions according to Eqs. (23), (25), and (28), respec-
S1 = exp((fi − fr1 )∕(abs(fi + 𝜀))) (26) tively. Their fitness values are then recalculated using
updated positions.
( ) (4) Update individual’s best fitness value and the global best
S2 = exp( fr2 − fi , (27)
fitness value: in this iteration, if the chicken’s fitness
where xr1,j
t
is the position of individual rooster indi- value is smaller than the previous best one, the chicken’s
vidual r1 in the population of hen xi; xr2,j
t
is the position best value and the global best solution will be updated.
of random individual r2 (rooster or hen) in the other (5) Completion of one iteration: if the number of iteration
population (r1 ≠ r2 ), respectively; Rand is a random time t is less than Tmax, return to Step (2). Otherwise,
number in the interval [1]; S1 and S2 denote the the algorithm is terminated and the global best solution
weights; fr1 and fr2 are the fitness value of individual is outputted as the optimal values of control variables,
rooster in the population of hen xi and random indi- i.e., the optimal values of (K, 𝛼) for VMD.
vidual r2 in the other population, respectively;
(3) The position updating of chicks can be formulated as: The flowchart of the CSO-VMD method is presented in
( ) Fig. 1.
(28)
t+1 t t t
xi,j = xi,j + FL ∗ xm,j − xi,j , FL ∈
3.3.3 Instantaneous frequency identification
where FL is a parameter, indicating the degree that the
chick would follow its mother to forage for food; xm,j t
The extraction of the IFs from the decomposed bridge-
stands for the position of the mother of i-th chick related components can be achieved by Hilbert transform
( m ∈ [1, Nm ]). (HT). However, the identified results using HT includes a
(4) The change of hierarchical order: the status of the fast-varying frequency portion that may interfere with the
chicken swarm’s hierarchical order will remain stable critical nonlinear characteristics due to the crack damage [31,
during a period of time. To guarantee the optimal solu- 41]. Therefore, ridge detection in time–frequency represen-
tion, these statuses should be updated every G iterations tation (TFR) of the decomposed component is adopted to
to adapt to changes in chickens’ fitness values. estimate the IFs. In this study, the wavelet transform is used
to obtain the TFR of the response components extracted by
CSO-VMD. The ridge detection approach proposed in [42]
3.3.2 CSO‑VMD is employed to extract the ridge of the TFR that corresponds
to the IF at each instant of time.
The procedure of CSO-VMD is depicted as follows:
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
4.1 Dynamic responses of the bridge breathing and open cracks are quite similar and it is dif-
under a moving load ficult to see the opening and closing phenomena of the
breathing crack.
The effect of open crack to the bridge is often modelled
by a rotational spring connecting two undamaged beam 4.2 Sub‑ and super‑harmonic resonances
segments considering a crack compliance. To validate the of a cracked beam
proposed model and algorithm in this study, the mid-span
displacement of the bridge under a moving load of 40kN The nonlinear dynamic behaviour of a cracked beam due to
is compared with that by the rotational spring model in the crack opening and closing may lead to the manifesta-
[14]. Two crack cases are studied, e.g. the crack depth tion of nonlinear effects such as the sub- and super-harmonic
ratio a/h = 0.3 at the location of 1/5L from left support of resonances [43]. Thus, the spectral analysis of the vibration
bridge, and the crack depth ratio a/h = 0.4 at mid-span, in response around nonlinear resonances has been used for
correspondence to a moving load at the speed 2 m/s and structural damage detection. The existing study indicates
4 m/s, respectively. Figure 2a shows the bridge displace- that when the cracked beam is excited by the forcing fre-
ment responses at mid-span. The results obtained by the quency fw = 1/n*fb1 or n*fb1 (n = 1, 2, 3,…; fb1 is the first
present model are very close to those in [14]. Considering bridge natural frequency), the nonlinear behaviour presented
the first crack case, the mid-span acceleration responses in the bridge response spectrum can be more visible than that
of the bridge subjected to a moving load at a speed 2 m/s by other exciting frequencies [44, 45]. Therefore, a moving
using two crack models are shown in Fig. 2b. In the figure, sinusoidal force with its amplitude 10 N and its frequency
the results by two models also agree well. The results show fw = 1/2 fb1 is simulated in the same way as [46], which is
that the proposed model is effective and accurate for the used to excite the bridge. The exciting force is moving over
crack model. the bridge at a speed of 2 m/s, that the acceleration response
Figure 3 shows the displacement responses of the bridge measured at 3/8 span of the bridge is used for spectral analy-
at mid-span when the load is passing with a speed of 2 m/s sis. The Fourier spectra of bridge responses considering dif-
considering different crack conditions at mid-span, i.e., ferent crack cases of bridge are shown in Fig. 4a, with crack
no damage, a/h = 0.2 and a/h = 0.4 for open and breathing depth ratio a/h = 0.4 at mid-span. For no damage and open
crack cases, respectively. The results show that the dis- crack cases, the principal harmonic component around the
placement of the bridge without the crack is much smaller exciting frequency fw has the largest amplitude. The ampli-
than that with the crack. The displacement response of tude of the harmonic component around the bridge natural
bridge with a breathing crack is smaller than that with a frequency fb1 is relatively small. For the breathing crack case,
fully open crack of the same depth, but the difference is the amplitude of the harmonic component around the natural
not obvious when the crack depth is small, i.e., a/h = 0.2. frequency is slightly larger than that around the exciting fre-
It means that when the crack is small, the behaviors of quency. Moreover, the response spectrum of the bridge with
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
10 -3 10-3
2 2
a/h=0.3 at 1/5L, v=2m/s: Present
0 a/h=0.3 at 1/5L, v=2m/s: Reference No damage
0
a/h=0.4 at 1/2L, v=4m/s: Present Open crack: a/h=0.2
-2 a/h=0.4 at 1/2L, v=4m/s: Reference Breathing crack: a/h=0.2
-2 Open crack: a/h=0.4
Breathing crack: a/h=0.4
Dsiplacement [m]
-4
Displacement [m]
-4
-6
-6
-8
-10 -8
-12 -10
-14
0 10 20 30 40 50 -12
Distance along the bridge [m]
(a) Displacement responses -14
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance along the bridge [m]
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
1 0.96
10
For a/h=0.2: True value
fw= 1/2 fb1 No damage
For a/h=0.2: Open crack
Open crack 0.95
fb1 Breathing crack For a/h=0.2: Breathing crack
10 0 For a/h=0.4: True value
0.94 For a/h=0.4: Open crack
For a/h=0.4: Breathing crack
Normalized amplitude
fw+fb1
10 -1
Frequency [Hz]
0.93
Damage location
2fw+fb1 0.92
-2
10
0.91
10 -3 0.9
0.89
-4
10
0.88
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance along the bridge [m]
0 1 (a) IFs of bridge considering different crack cases
10 10
Frequency [Hz]
TFR
(a) For frequency of exciting force fw=1/2 fb1 1.3
10 -3
IF by ridge detection
10
1 1.2 IF by HT 3.5
No damage
fw= 2 fb1 Open crack 3
10 0 Breathing crack
1.1
Frequency [Hz]
2.5
fb1
10 -1
Normalized amplitude
1
f
b2
4 fw 2
-2
3 fw
10 0.9
1.5
10 -3 1
0.8
10 -4 0.5
0.7
10 -5 0 10 20 30 40 50
Distance along the bridge [m]
10 -6 (b) IFs identified by ridge detection and HT
10 0 10 1
Frequency [Hz]
Fig. 5 IFs of bridge subjected to a moving load considering a single
(b) For frequency of exciting force fw=2 fb1 crack
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
0.95 0.95
0.94 0.94
0.93 0.93
0.92
0.92
Frequency [Hz]
0.91
Frequency [Hz]
0.91
0.9
Damage location 1 0.9
0.89
0.89
0.88
Damage location 2 0.88
0.87
results show that there are two minimum values of the IF (b) Instantaneous curvatures at crack locations
during the passage of the loads on the bridge. The first mini-
mum value is at about 15 m and the other one is between 30 Fig. 7 Instantaneous frequencies and curvatures of bridge consider-
and 35 m of the bridge. The distance in the x-axis of figures ing multiple loads and cracks
showing instantaneous frequency and instantaneous curva-
ture denotes the moving distance of first (/front) load to the response measurement, i.e., 10 and 15%, respectively. The
left support of the bridge. The results indicate that the IF results in Fig. 7a show that the measurement noise has little
reaches to a local minimum value at about the time when the effect on the identified IFs by the proposed method.
second load arrives at the crack locations. Therefore, after
shifting with the distance between two loads, that is subtract- 4.4 Nonlinear characteristics of cracked bridge
ing 4.27 m from the locations of the minimum IF values in considering VBI
the figure, can improve the accuracy of crack localization
under given conditions. Figure 7b shows the instantaneous In previous study, the constant moving load is considered.
curvatures of the bridge under moving loads. The maxi- However, when heavy vehicle is passing over the bridge, the
mum values of the instantaneous curvatures occur at crack dynamic interaction between the vehicle and bridge needs
locations, respectively. The results are consistent with the to be considered. The nonstationary and nonlinear dynamic
analytical model of the breathing crack in Sect. 2.2.2 that characteristics of cracked bridge due to the VBI needs further
the maximum curvature leads to the full open of the breath- investigation. A widely used VBI model in the literature is
ing crack. The effect of measurement noise is also studied considered as shown in Fig. 8, where the vehicle is mod-
by considering another two levels of Gaussian noise to the eled as a two-axle half-car with 4 degrees-of-freedom. The
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
Frequency [Hz]
Mass of rear axle kg m2 1000
2.47 × 106
0.85
Stiffness of front suspension N/m Ks1
Stiffness of rear suspension N/m Ks2 4.23 × 106
Damping of front suspension N s/m Cs1 3.00 × 104
Damping of rear suspension N s/m Cs2 4.00 × 104 0.8
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
1 0.92
0.9
0.95
0.88
Frequency [Hz]
Frequency [Hz]
0.9
2nd local reduction 0.86
0.84
0.85
0.82
0.8
0.8
Open crack Open crack
Breathing crack Breathing crack
0.75 0.78
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance along the bridge [m] Distance along the bridge [m]
(a) IFs
Fig. 11 IFs of bridge subjected to a moving vehicle considering a sin-
10
-4 gle crack and roughness
3
2.5
0.92
2
Instantaneous curvature
0.9
1.5
0.88
1
Frequency [Hz]
0.5 0.86
0 0.84
Curvature at first crack location
Curvature at second crack location
-0.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0.82
Distance along the bridge [m] Open crack
Breathing crack
(b) Instantaneous curvatures at crack locations
0.8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance along the bridge [m]
Fig. 10 IFs and curvatures of bridge subjected to a moving vehicle
and multiple cracks
Fig. 12 IFs of bridge subjected to a moving vehicle considering mul-
tiple cracks and roughness
IF of breathing crack case alone. However, when compared
to the bridge IF of open crack case, there is an obvious IF
reduction at the mid-span of the bridge for single crack 4.5 Comparison of the proposed CSO‑VMD
condition, as shown in Fig. 11. For the multi-crack condi- to the conventional VMD
tion, two obvious local IF reductions near the crack loca-
tions can also be observed, as shown in Fig. 12. The reduc- The superiority of the proposed CSO-VMD over the con-
tion of IF values of breathing crack case compared to the ventional VMD is demonstrated by examining their perfor-
open crack case is due to the open of breathing cracks for mance in bridge response decomposition. The bridge accel-
both conditions. Therefore, the identified nonlinear charac- eration response when the vehicle moves over the rough
teristics due to the breathing cracks of bridge can provide bridge deck is analyzed. Figure 13 shows the bridge response
preliminary information to estimate the crack locations. and response spectrum considering aforementioned multi-
ple breathing cracks. From the spectrum, it shows that the
bridge response contains the dynamic components related to
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
0
0.05
-0.05
0 0 5 10 15 20 25
0.05
-0.05
0
Amplitude [m/s 2 ]
-0.1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 -0.05
Distance along the bridge [m] 0 5 10 15 20 25
0.05
Response spectrum
0.3 f b1
0
Amplitude [dB]
-0.05
0.2 f v2 0 5 10 15 20
0.01
0.1 f
v1 0
By CSO-VMD By VMD
-0.01
0 0 5 10 15 20 25
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Time [Sec]
Frequency [Hz]
(a) Components in time domain
Fig. 13 Bridge response and response spectrum
0.2
the vehicle due to VBI, indicated as fv1 and fv2 in the figure.
The fb1 represents the first natural frequency of bridge. The 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
parameter setting for the CSO-VMD is the same as the above. 0.1 Component related to f by
v1
For the CSO-VMD, the identified optimal number of modes 0.05 CSO-VMD
in the response is 6 and the optimal penalty factor is 9850. 0
Amplitude
penalty factor is 8373 (= 0.85 × 9850) which are deliberately 0.2 By CSO-VMD
By VMD
selected to close the optimal values. The decomposition per-
0.1
0
formance of CSO-VMD and VMD is studied. Figure 14a and 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.01
b shows the extracted first four components in time and fre-
quency domains, respectively. The fifth and sixth components 0.005
are related to the higher modes of bridge and the results from 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
two methods are very similar which are, therefore, not pre- Frequency [Hz]
sented accordingly. The first component from two methods is (b) Components in frequency domain
the related to the first modal frequency of bridge. The second
and third modes from CSO-VMD are related to the vehicle Fig. 14 Bridge response decomposition by CSO-VMD and VMD
frequencies fv1 and fv2, respectively. The results indicate that
the CSO-VMD successfully extracts the slight component
related to the vehicle dynamic mode fv1, as shown in Fig. 14b. 5 Laboratory experimental study
While, the second and third modes from conventional VMD
are both related to fv2. The components related to fv1 and fv2 5.1 Experimental set‑up and test procedures
are not well separated. The fourth mode is related to the third
bridge dynamic mode. It can be seen that the CSO-VMD Reinforced concrete Tee-section beam (RC Tee-beam) is a
provides better decomposition performance than VMD due typical structural component to fabricate simply supported
to the parameter optimization. highway bridges. An experimental investigation on the
dynamic characteristics of the RC Tee-beam is conducted.
The schematic description of the experimental set-up is pre-
sented in Fig. 15a, which includes three Tee-section rein-
forced concrete beams and a test model vehicle pulled by an
electric motor to move along the beam. Three beams consist
of the leading and trailing beams with a length 4.5 m each
and a main beam in the middle. The length of the main beam
is 5 m and the dimensions of the cross-section are shown in
Fig. 15b. A 60 mm diameter hole is left in the beam rib for
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
posttensioning of the beam after introducing damage to the The beam is tested in three different states, i.e., intact state
beam. The total mass of the beam is 1050 kg. For the model case, small damage case, and large damage case, respectively.
vehicle, the axle spacing is 0.8 m, and the wheel spacing is The damage is created in the form of cracks using incremen-
0.39 m with a total weight of 10.60 kN. The vehicle/bridge tal static load tests. For small damage case, a three-point load
weight ratio is 1.03 that can be considered as the situation system was applied at 1/3L from the left support of the main
of a bridge under an extra heavy vehicle. The vehicle moves beam with the peak static load to 50 kN. The loading and
along the beam at an approximate speed of 0.5 m/s during unloading procedures caused several tensile cracks with a
the moving VBI tests. Seven accelerometers are evenly dis- crack zone of 760 mm length around the loading point. For
tributed at the bottom and along the beam to measure the the large damage case, similar loading procedure to the small
dynamic responses of the beam. An INV300 data acquisition damage case was applied at 2/3L of the beam at first. Further
system is used to collect the data with the sampling frequency loading was applied with a four-point load system at 1/3L
2024.292 Hz. and 2/3L with the final load 105kN to create a crack zone
2371 mm length. During the static load test, the monitoring
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
Note: the percentage in parenthesis is the frequency change ratio to the ‘No damage’ case
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
40
Measured at 1/8L 40
38 Measured at 4/8L
Measured at 6/8L 38
36
36
Frequency [Hz]
34
34
32
Frequency [Hz]
32
30
30
28
28
26
24 26
24 No damage
22 Large damage
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 After post-tensioning
22
Vehicle position [m] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Vehicle position [m]
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
123
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
17. Lee JH, Fenves GL (1998) Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading 34. Li H, Liu T, Wu X, Chen Q (2020) An optimized VMD method
of concrete structures. J Eng Mech 124(8):892–900. https://d oi.o rg/ and its applications in bearing fault diagnosis. Measurement
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892) 166:108185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108185
18. Nguyen KV (2013) Comparison studies of open and breathing 35. Meng XB, Liu Y, Gao XZ, Zhang HZ (2014) A new bio-inspired
crack detections of a beam-like bridge subjected to a moving vehi- algorithm: chicken swarm optimization. In: International confer-
cle. Eng Struct 51:306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstr uct. ence in swarm intelligence. Springer, pp 86–94. https://doi.org/10.
2013.01.018 1007/978-3-319-11857-4_10
19. Yin XF, Liu Y, Deng L, Kong X (2017) Dynamic behavior of dam- 36. Li YT, Wu Y, Qu XJ (2017) Chicken swarm-based method for
aged bridge with multi-cracks under moving vehicular loads. Int ascent trajectory optimization of hypersonic vehicles. J Aerosp Eng
J Struct Stab Dyn 17(02):1750019. https://doi.org/10.1142/S 0219 30(5):04017043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.
455417500195 0000757
20. Dimarogonas AD (1996) Vibration of cracked structures: a state 37. Deb S, Gao XZ, Tammi K, Kalita K, Mahanta P (2020) Recent
of the art review. Eng Fract Mech 55(5):831–857. https://doi.org/ studies on Chicken Swarm Optimization algorithm: a review
10.1016/0013-7944(94)00175-8 (2014–2018). Artif Intell Rev 53(3):1737–1765. https://doi.org/
21. Pakrashi V, O’Connor A, Basu B (2010) A bridge-vehicle interac- 10.1007/s10462-019-09718-3
tion based experimental investigation of damage evolution. Struct 38. Zheng DY, Kessissoglou NJ (2002) Free vibration analysis of a
Health Monit 9(4):285–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921709 cracked beam by finite element method. J Sound Vib 273:457–475.
352147 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00504-2
22. McGetrick PJ, Kim CW (2013) A parametric study of a drive by 39. Bertsekas DP (1982) Constrained optimization and Lagrange mul-
bridge inspection system based on the Morlet wavelet. Key Eng tiplier methods. Comput Sci Appl Math. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Mater 569–570:262–269. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific. C2013-0-10366-2
net/KEM.569-570.262 40. Huang QY, Liu X, Li Q, Zhou Y, Yang T, Ran MX (2021) A
23. Mei QP, Gül M, Boay M (2019) Indirect health monitoring of parameter-optimized variational mode decomposition method
bridges using Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients and principal using salp swarm algorithm and its application to acoustic-
component analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 119:523–546. based detection for internal defects of arc magnets. AIP Adv
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.10.006 11(6):065216. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0054894
24. Cantero D, McGetrick P, Kim CW, O’Brien E (2019) Experimental 41. Wang ZC, Xin Y, Ren WX (2015) Nonlinear structural model
monitoring of bridge frequency evolution during the passage of updating based on instantaneous frequencies and amplitudes of the
vehicles with different suspension properties. Eng Struct 187:209– decomposed dynamic responses. Eng Struct 100:189–200. https://
219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.065 doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.002
25. Wang HQ, Nagayama T, Nakasuka J, Zhao BY, Su D (2018) 42. Iatsenko D, McClintock PVE, Stefanovska A (2016) Extraction of
Extraction of bridge fundamental frequency from estimated vehicle instantaneous frequencies from ridges in time-frequency represen-
excitation through a particle filter approach. J Sound Vib 428:44– tations of signals. Signal Process 125:290–303. https://doi.o rg/1 0.
58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.04.030 1016/j.sigpro.2016.01.024
26. Zhan JW, Zhang F, Siahkouhi M, Kong X, Xia H (2021) A dam- 43. Sinha JK (2009) Higher order coherences for fatigue crack detec-
age identification method for connections of adjacent box-beam tion. Eng Struct 31(2):534–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engst
bridges using vehicle-bridge interaction analysis and model updat- ruct.2008.10.004
ing. Eng Struct 228:111551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstr uct. 44. Long H, Liu YL, Liu KF (2019) Nonlinear vibration analysis of a
2020.111551 beam with a breathing crack. Appl Sci 9(18):3874. https://doi.org/
27. Kildashti K, Makki Alamdari M, Kim CW, Gao W, Samali B 10.3390/app9183874
(2020) Drive-by-bridge inspection for damage identification 45. Bovsunovsky AP, Surace C, Bovsunovsky OA (2006) The effect
in a cable-stayed bridge: numerical investigations. Eng Struct of damping and force application point on the non-linear dynamic
223:110891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110891 behaviour of a cracked beam at sub and superresonance vibra-
28. Li JT, Guo J, Zhu XQ (2021) Time-varying parameter identifi- tions. Strength Mater 38(5):492–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/
cation of bridges subject to moving vehicles using ridge extrac- s11223-006-0068-8
tion based on empirical wavelet transform. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 46. Pugno N, Surace C, Ruotolo R (2000) Evaluation of the non-linear
21(04):2150046. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455421500462 dynamic response to harmonic excitation of a beam with several
29. Zhang J, Yang D, Ren WX, Yuan Y (2021) Time-varying char- breathing cracks. J Sound Vib 235(5):749–762. https://doi.o rg/1 0.
acteristics analysis of vehicle-bridge interaction system based on 1006/jsvi.2000.2980
modified S-transform reassignment technique. Mech Syst Signal 47. Li JT, Zhu XQ, Law SS, Samali B (2020) A two-step drive-by
Process 160:107807. https://d oi.o rg/1 0.1 016/j.y mssp.2 021.107807 bridge damage detection using dual Kalman filter. Int J Struct Stab
30. Dragomiretskiy K, Zosso D (2014) Variational mode decomposi- Dyn 20(10):2042006. https://doi.org/10.1142/S02194554204200
tion. IEEE Trans Signal Process 62:531–544. https://doi.org/10. 67
1109/TSP.2013.2288675 48. Yang YB, Cheng MC, Chang KC (2013) Frequency variation
31. Xin Y, Li J, Hao H (2020) Damage detection in initially nonlinear in vehicle–bridge interaction systems. Int J Struct Stab Dyn
structures based on variational mode decomposition. Int J Struct 13(02):1350019. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455413500193
Stab Dyn 20(10):2042009. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021945542 49. Kim CY, Jung DS, Kim NS, Kwon SD, Feng MQ (2003) Effect of
0420092 vehicle weight on natural frequencies of bridges measured from
32. Tian YD, Zhang J (2020) Structural flexibility identification via traffic-induced vibration. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 2(1):109–115.
moving-vehicle-induced time-varying modal parameters. J Sound https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857543
Vib 474:115264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115264
33. Yang YB, Shi K, Wang ZL, Xu H, Zhang B, Wu YT (2021) Using Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
a single-DOF test vehicle to simultaneously retrieve the first few jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
frequencies and damping ratios of the bridge. Int J Struct Stab Dyn
21(08):2150108. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021945542150108X
123