Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Secfile 393
Secfile 393
Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory Solutions U.S. serves customers worldwide with
CCH, Aspen Publishers, and Kluwer Law International products.
(www.WKLegaledu.com)
Wolters Kluwer
Attn: Order Department
PO Box 990
Frederick, MD 21705
KF8935.M28 2016
347.73'6—dc23
2015036844
8
About Wolters Kluwer Legal &
Regulatory Solutions U.S.
Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory Solutions U.S. delivers expert content
and solutions in the areas of law, corporate compliance, health compliance,
reimbursement, and legal education. Its practical solutions help customers
successfully navigate the demands of a changing environment to drive
their daily activities, enhance decision quality and inspire confident
outcomes.
9
Contents
Preface
Citations
10
Preface
Citations
§1.1. Introduction
§1.2. The three “Rs”
1. Relevance
2. Reliability
3. Rightness
§1.3. Using the three “Rs”
§1.4. Conclusion
§2.1. Introduction
§2.2. Sources of judicial power
1. FRE 102
2. FRE 611
3. FRE 614
§2.3. Sources of judicial procedure
1. FRE 104
2. FRE 103
3. FRE 105
§2.4. Raising and meeting objections
§3.1. Introduction
§3.2. Mentioning inadmissible evidence
1. Law
2. Practice
11
§3.3. Mentioning unprovable evidence
1. Law
2. Practice
§3.4. Arguing
1. Law
2. Practice
§3.5. Stating personal opinions
1. Law
2. Practice
§3.6. Discussing law
1. Law
2. Practice
§3.7. Mentioning the opponent’s case
1. Law
2. Practice
§4.1. Introduction
§4.2. Witness competency (FRE 601)
1. Law
2. Practice
§4.3. Oath or affirmation (FRE 603)
1. Law
2. Practice
§4.4. Improper witnesses (FRE 605, 606)
1. Law
2. Practice
§4.5. Who may call witnesses (FRE 614)
1. Law
2. Practice
§4.6. Excluding witnesses (FRE 615)
1. Law
2. Practice
§4.7. Personal knowledge and opinions (FRE 602, 701)
1. Law
2. Practice
§4.8. Impeaching own witnesses (FRE 607)
1. Law
12
2. Practice
§4.9. Leading questions (FRE 611(c))
1. Law
2. Practice
§4.10. Other form objections
1. Law
2. Practice
§4.11. Refreshing recollection and recorded recollection (FRE 612,
803(5))
1. Law
2. Practice
§5.1. Introduction
§5.2. General relevance
1. Law
a. FRE 401-402
i. What are the matters in issue in the case?
ii. Is the evidence probative of a matter in issue in the case?
b. FRE 403
2. Practice
§5.3. Special relevancy rules
1. Character traits
a. Law
i. “Essential element” rule
ii. “Circumstantial evidence” rule
b. Practice
c. Summary of character evidence
2. Other crimes, wrongs, and acts
a. Law
b. Practice
c. Summary of other uncharged crimes, wrongs, or acts
3. Similar incidents evidence
a. Law
b. Practice
4. Other acts evidence in sexual assault cases (FRE 412-415)
a. Law
b. FRE 412
c. FRE 413-415
13
d. Practice
5. Habit and routine practice (FRE 406)
a. Law
b. Practice
§6.1. Introduction
§6.2. The hearsay rules
1. A “statement”
2. “Other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the
trial or hearing”
3. “Offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted”
§6.3. Non-hearsay
1. Law
a. Independent legal significance
b. Impeachment
c. Effect on listener’s state of mind
2. Practice
§6.4. Prior statement by witness (FRE 801(d)(1))
1. Law
a. Prior inconsistent statements made under oath used for
impeachment
b. Prior consistent statements
c. A statement of identification of a person
2. Practice
§6.5. Admission by party-opponent (FRE 801(d)(2))
1. Law
a. A party’s own admission
b. Adoptive admissions
c. Admissions by authorized persons, agents, and employees
d. Co-conspirator statements
2. Practice
§6.6. Summary of hearsay analysis
§7.1. Introduction
14
1. Hearsay exceptions rationale
2. The FRE 803 exceptions
3. The FRE 804 exceptions
4. The Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause
5. Organizing hearsay exceptions
§7.2. Present sense impressions (FRE 803(1))
1. Law
2. Practice
§7.3. Excited utterances (FRE 803(2))
1. Law
2. Practice
§7.4. Then existing mental, emotional, or physical conditions (FRE
803(3))
1. Law
2. Practice
§7.5. Statements for purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment (FRE
803(4))
1. Law
2. Practice
§7.6. Statements under belief of impending death (FRE 804(b)(2))
1. Law
2. Practice
§7.7. Former testimony (FRE 804(b)(1))
1. Law
2. Practice
§7.8. Statements against interest (FRE 804(b)(3))
1. Law
2. Practice
§7.9. Statements of personal or family history (FRE 804(b)(4))
1. Law
2. Practice
§7.10. Business records (FRE 803(6), 803(7), 902(11), 902(12))
1. Law
2. Practice
§7.11. Public records (FRE 803(8)-803(17))
1. Law
2. Practice
§7.12. Recorded recollection (FRE 803(5))
1. Law
2. Practice
15
§7.13. Reputation evidence (FRE 803(19)-803(21))
1. Law
2. Practice
§7.14. Treatises (FRE 803(18))
1. Law
2. Practice
§7.15. Residual or catchall exception (FRE 807)
1. Law
a. Trustworthiness
b. Necessity
c. Material fact
d. Satisfy general purpose of Rules and interests of justice
e. Notice
2. Practice
§7.16. Hearsay within hearsay (FRE 805)
1. Law
2. Practice
§7.17. Attacking and supporting credibility of declarant (FRE 806)
1. Law
2. Practice
16
§8.7. Victim’s past sexual behavior or alleged sexual predisposition in
sex offense cases (FRE 412)
1. Law
2. Practice
§8.8. Introduction to privileges
§8.9. Preliminary considerations
§8.10. Marital privilege to bar spousal testimony
1. Law
2. Practice
§8.11. Interspousal communications privilege
1. Law
2. Practice
§8.12. Attorney-client privilege
1. Law
2. Practice
§8.13. Doctor-patient privilege
1. Law
2. Practice
§8.14. Other privileges
§9.1. Introduction
§9.2. Frye, Daubert, Joiner, and Kumho Tire
1. Law
2. Practice
§9.3. Relevancy
1. Law
2. Practice
§9.4. Reliability
1. Law
2. Practice
§9.5. Sources of facts and data on which expert relies
1. Law
2. Practice
§9.6. Disclosure of basis of expert’s testimony
1. Law
2. Practice
§9.7. Form of expert’s testimony
1. Law
17
2. Practice
§9.8. FRE 403
1. Law
2. Practice
§9.9. Court-appointed experts
1. Law
2. Practice
X. EXHIBITS
§10.1. Introduction
§10.2. Foundations
§10.3. Real evidence
1. Law
a. Sensory identification
b. Chain of custody
2. Practice
§10.4. Demonstrative evidence
1. Law
2. Practice
§10.5. Documents and instruments
1. Law
2. Practice
§10.6. Business records
1. Law
2. Practice
§10.7. Public records
1. Law
2. Practice
§10.8. Recorded recollection
1. Law
2. Practice
§10.9. Summaries
1. Law
2. Practice
§10.10. Original documents (“best evidence”) rule
1. Law
2. Practice
§10.11. Electronic evidence
1. Computerized business records, data, and metadata
18
2. Electronic communications—overview
3. Authenticity of electronic communications
4. Digital photographs
5. Computer-generated animations and simulations
§11.1. Introduction
§11.2. Judicial notice
1. Law
2. Practice
§11.3. Presumptions
1. Burden of proof
2. Presumptions and inferences
§12.1. Introduction
§12.2. Cross-examination
1. Law
2. Practice
§12.3. Impeachment procedures
1. Law
a. “Voucher” rule rejected
b. Impeachment methods
c. The good faith requirement
d. The “confrontation” or “warning question” requirement
e. The relevancy requirement and the “collateral”–“non-
collateral” dichotomy
2. Practice
§12.4. Impeachment methods
1. Bias, interest, and motive
a. Law
b. Practice
2. Prior inconsistent statements
a. Law
b. Practice
3. Contradictory facts
a. Law
19
b. Practice
4. Prior convictions
a. Law
i. Overview of FRE 609
ii. The “general rule” of FRE 609(a)
iii. The 10-year rule of FRE 609(b)
iv. Pardons, juvenile convictions, and appeals
v. The FRE 104(a) hearing
b. Practice
5. Character for untruthfulness
a. Law
i. Character witness testimony about the truth-telling character
of a fact witness
ii. Cross-examination of a truth-telling character witness
b. Practice
6. Conduct probative of untruthfulness
a. Law
b. Practice
i. The fact witness
ii. The character witness
7. Treatises
a. Law
b. Practice
8. Impeaching out-of-court declarants
a. Law
b. Practice
§13.1. Introduction
§13.2. Redirect examination
1. Law
2. Practice
§13.3. Recross-examination
1. Law
2. Practice
§13.4. Rebuttal
1. Law
2. Practice
§13.5. Surrebuttal
20
1. Law
2. Practice
§14.1. Introduction
§14.2. Mentioning unadmitted evidence
1. Law
2. Practice
§14.3. Misstating or mischaracterizing the evidence
1. Law
2. Practice
§14.4. Making improper comments on missing evidence
1. Law
2. Practice
§14.5. Stating personal opinions and making personal attacks
1. Law
2. Practice
§14.6. Appealing to sympathy, prejudice, and passions
1. Law
2. Practice
§14.7. Arguing the law
1. Law
2. Practice
§14.8. Making improper damages arguments
1. Law
2. Practice
§14.9. Arguing consequences of a conviction or verdict
1. Law
2. Practice
§14.10. Making improper rebuttal arguments
1. Law
2. Practice
Appendix
FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE
Index
21
22
Why Trial Evidence? The present legal landscape has numerous
evidence hornbooks and treatises, many of which are authoritative and
longstanding. What are the gaps in the existing literature that this book
seeks to fill?
This book is different from existing ones in several ways. First, it
reflects the way judges and trial lawyers in the real world of trials think, or
should think, about evidence, using the “three Rs”—relevant, reliable, and
right—as its analytical framework. Second, it is structured around the
sequential components of a trial—beginning with opening statements and
ending with closing arguments—rather than the numerical structure of the
Federal Rules of Evidence. Third, it allocates space according to how
important the topic is to judges and trial lawyers in the real world of trials,
rather than according to the interest level of academicians. For example,
party admissions and business records are important topics to trial lawyers,
judicial notice and presumptions less so, and the book reflects these
realities. Fourth, and most important, the book bridges the gap between
evidence as an academic subject in the classroom and evidence as a
functional tool in the courtroom. It shows where the evidence rules are
commonly used in the real world of trials and how the effective trial
lawyer uses them to persuade the judge deciding evidentiary issues.
This book does not claim to do some things. It does not approach
evidence from a historical development, social policy, or comparative law
perspective. It is neither a critical analysis of the existing rules nor a
critique of interpretative case law. It accepts the present evidence rules, the
ones lawyers and judges deal with on a daily basis, and analyzes them
functionally. It shows how those rules apply in the daily life of the
courtroom and how a lawyer can and should use the law as a functional
tool to persuade the judge making the evidentiary rulings.
We have not attempted to duplicate the research done by the leading
treatises. Instead, we rely on them. The book is principally footnoted to
McCormick on Evidence, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, Wigmore on
23
Evidence, and Evidence by Mueller and Kirkpatrick. The citations to these
treatises will be much more useful than individual case citations in
researching evidentiary issues that arise.
The chapters in the book have law and practice sections. The law
sections contain functional overviews of the Federal Rules of Evidence,
footnoted to the major treatises. We have relied on these and other treatises
as well as the Advisory Committee’s Notes. The practice sections contain
realistic examples, in commonly recurring fact settings, of how particular
rules are used before and during trials, how lawyers should (and
sometimes fail to) make proper evidentiary objections, and how judges
make rulings. These examples are based on actual federal and state cases.
The examples get into the mind of the judge by noting the judge’s
thoughts, concerns, and reasoning when ruling on objections. We believe
this approach is what inexperienced trial lawyers need to learn when
bridging the gap between evidence rules as academic subjects and
evidence rules as courtroom tools.
Why us? Each of us has been a trial lawyer, professor, and judge.
Collectively we have over 25 years of experience as trial lawyers, over 50
years as professors teaching and writing about evidence and trial
advocacy, and over 30 years as civil and criminal trial judges. During these
years, we have noted a disturbing, recurring fact: Many lawyers, while
“knowing” evidence rules, are less capable of using those rules as
functional tools to persuade trial judges to rule in their favor. Since we
have lived in both the world of academe and the world of trials, we hope
that our collective experiences will be useful to those who will, and those
who do, use the Federal Rules of Evidence or their state counterparts on a
regular basis in the courtroom.
Throughout the book, we have used masculine pronouns to refer to
the judges and lawyers. We did this for the sake of simplicity and
consistency, and for no other reason.
A book is always the result of more than the efforts of its authors. Our
spouses, Gloria Torres Mauet and Hon. Lauretta Higgins Wolfson
(retired), have been patient supporters of this effort from its inception.
They are both trial lawyers, and their thoughtful suggestions have
influenced the book in numerous ways. To our students and staff who have
worked with us, we say thanks.
The changes to this sixth edition are principally four-fold. First, we
have revised and expanded Sec. 7.1 and other sections dealing with the
Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause, including the Supreme Court’s
most recent decision in Ohio v. Clark, decided in June 2015. Second, we
24
have revised Sec. 10.11 covering electronic communications evidence. In
particular, the issue of authentication has become central in determining
the admissibility of electronic communications, and the section expands its
analysis of this issue. Third, amendments to Rules 801(d)(1)(B) and
803(6)-(8) of the Federal Rules of Evidence became law on December 1,
2014. Rule 801(d)(1)(B)(ii) expands the use of a witness’s prior consistent
statements “to rehabilitate the declarant’s credibility as a witness when
attacked on another ground.” Rule 803(6)-(8) now make clear that the
opponent to the admissibility of business and public records has the burden
of showing that the “source of information or the method or circumstances
of preparation indicate a lack of trustworthiness.” Finally, the text
incorporates all Supreme Court decisions through June 2015 affecting
evidence rules.
We hope you will find the additions to this sixth edition valuable.
Thomas A. Mauet
Tucson, Arizona
Warren D. Wolfson
Chicago, Illinois
25
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
always and to remember that the modern woman owes it to herself to go out
of the home and keep abreast with the times?”
But it was not a question. It was a statement. Freda made no reply and
her mother changed the subject with the satisfied air of the sower of seed.
“When you come to Ireland,” she told her father laughingly that night,
“you will sit on the doorstep and learn to smoke a pipe. And Gregory will
be president of the Republic. And I will be—(ask mother)—a model
housewife, chasing the pigs—”
They laughed with an abandonment which indicated some joke deeper
than the banality about the pigs.
“It’s a worthy task,” said her father. “I’ll come—and I’ll enjoy learning
to smoke a pipe and see Gregory run the government—and as for you—
whatever you do you’ll be doing it with spirit.”
She nodded.
“I’ve just begun to break my trail.”
Then the day came when they must leave the little frame house and after
the excitement of getting extremely long railway tickets at the station and
checking all Freda’s luggage through to New York, they said good-by to the
Thorstads and left them standing together, incongruous even in their
farewells to their daughter.
They were to stop at St. Pierre over night. Mrs. Flandon had written to
urge them to do so and Freda would not have refused, if she had been
inclined to, bearing the sense of her obligation to them. She had not told her
father of that. It amused her to think that her father and Gregory each felt
the other responsible for those Fortunatus strings of railway ticket. But she
wanted Gregory to meet the Flandons again that the debt might be more
explainable later on.
St. Pierre was familiar this time when they entered it in mid-afternoon as
she had on that first arrival with her mother. It was pleasant to see Mrs.
Flandon again and to taste just for a moment the comfortable luxury of the
Flandon house. Freda felt in Mrs. Flandon a warmth of friendliness which
made it easy to speak of the money and assure her of Gregory’s ability to
pay it a little later.
“You’re not to bother,” said Helen, “until you’re quite ready. We were
more glad to send it than I can tell you. It’s a hostage to fortune for us.”
Then she changed the subject quickly.
“I wonder if you’ll mind that I asked a few people for dinner to-night.
You married a celebrity and you want to get used to it. So many people
were interested in the news item about your marriage and wanted to meet
Gregory and you. I warned them not to dress so that’s all right.”
“It’s very nice,” said Freda, “I’ll enjoy it and I think—though I never
dare to speak for Gregory—that he will too. I remember having a beautiful
time at dinner here before. When I was here visiting the Brownleys you
asked me—do you remember?”
“I asked the Brownleys to-night. They were in town—all but Allie. I
asked the elder two and Bob and her young man—Ted Smillie, you know.”
She looked at Freda a little quizzically and Freda looked back,
wondering how much she knew.
“Think they’ll want to meet me?” she asked straight-forwardly.
“I do, very much. I think it’s better, Freda, just to put an end to any silly
talk. It may not matter to you but you know I liked your father so much and
it occurred to me that it might matter to him if any untrue gossip were not
killed. And it’s so very easy to kill it.”
“You take a great deal of trouble for me,” protested Freda.
Helen hesitated. She was on the verge of greater confidence and decided
against it.
“Let me do as I please then, will you?” she said smilingly and Freda
agreed.
Helen felt a little dishonest about it. The dinner was another hostage to
fortune. It was gathering up the loose ends neatly—it was brushing out of
sight bits of unsightly thought—establishing a basis which would enable
her later to do other things.
She had an idea that it would please Gage, though he had been non-
committal when she had broached the idea of having Gregory and his wife
for a brief visit. Helen had seen but little of Gage of late. She knew he was
working hard and badly worried about money. They had sold a piece of
property to raise that thousand for the Macmillans and he had told her
definitely of bad times ahead for him. She offered to reduce the expenses of
the household and he had agreed in the necessity. They must shave every
expense. But it invigorated Helen. She had amends to make to Gage and the
more practical the form the easier it was to make them. Neither of them
desired to unnecessarily trouble those dark waters of mental conflict now.
Helen guessed that Gage’s mind was not on her and that the bad tangle of
his business life absorbed him. Brusque, haggard, absorbed, never
attempting or apparently needing affection, he came and went. Never since
Carpenter’s death had they even discussed the question of separation. That
possibility was there. They had beaten a path to it. But hysteria was too
thoroughly weeded out of Gage to press toward it. Without mutual reproach
they both saw that separation in the immediate future was the last
advantageous thing for the work of either of them and flimsy as that
foundation seemed for life together, yet it held them. They turned their
backs upon what they had lost or given up and looked ahead. Helen heard
Gage refer some political question to her for the first time, with a kind of
wonder. She suspected irony, then dropped her own self-consciousness as it
became apparent that he really did not have any twisted motive behind the
query. She began to see that in great measure he had swung loose from her,
substituting some new strength for his dependence on her love. And, when
some moment of emotional sorrow at the loss of their ardors came over her,
she turned as neatly as did he from disturbing thought to the work, which
piled in on her by letter and by conference.
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.