Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BY X-RAY DIFFRACTION
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS (SINGLE PHASE)
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS BY PARAMETER
MEASUREMENT
The lattice parameter of a binary solid solution of B
in A depends only on the percentage of B in the
alloy, as long as the solution is unsaturated. This
fact can be made the basis for chemical analysis by
parameter measurement. All that is needed is a
parameter vs. composition curve, such as curve bc
of the figure shown, which can be established by
measuring the lattice parameter of a series of
previously analyzed alloys. This method has been
used in diffusion studies to measure the change in
concentration of a solution with distance from the
original interface. Its accuracy depends entirely on
the slope of the parameter-composition curve. In
alpha brasses, which can contain from 0 to about Variation of lattice
40 percent zinc in copper, an accuracy of +I constant with composition
percent zinc can be achieved without difficulty. in single phase region (bc
This method is applicable only to binary alloys. In curve) in a binary alloy.
ternary solid solutions, for example, the percentage Assume atom B is larger
of two components can be independently varied. than atom A.
The result is that two ternary solutions of quite
different compositions can have the same lattice
parameter.
Variation of lattice constans with
composition in binary nitride-carbide
systems. In these systems, the
variation is almost linear, obeying
Vegard’s law. Vegard’s law states
that in some material systems,
lattice constant varies linearly with
composition. If lattice constant is
measured, one can determine
chemical composition of the alloys
by using Vegard’s law.
Vegard’s Law
Where a TiCxN1-x is the lattice constant of titatnium carbonitride, a TiC is the lattice
constant of pure TiC, a TiN is the lattice constant of pure TiN, x is the mole fraction of
TiC in titanium carbonitride.
Precise lattice constant parameter measurement
We can obtain the same result directly by differentiating the Bragg law with respect
to θ. We obtain
λ = 2d sin θ
For a given error in θ
0 = 2 sin θΔd + 2d cosθΔθ
Δd θà90°, cot θ à 0
= − cot θΔθ
d Error Δa/a à0
a = d h +k +l
2 2 2
For cubic system
In summary 2θà180 °
Δa Δd
= = − cot θΔθ errorà0
a d
Although the parameter error disappears as 2θ approaches 180° ,we cannot
observe a reflected beam at this angle. But since the values of a calculated
for the various lines on the pattern approach the true value more closely as
2θ increases, we should be able to find the true value of a simply by plotting
the measured values against 2θ and extrapolating to 2θ = 180°.
Unfortunately, this curve is not linear and the extrapolation of a nonlinear
curve is not accurate. However, it may be shown that if the measured values
of a are plotted against certain functions of θ, rather than against θ or 2θ
directly, the resulting curve is a straight line which may be extrapolated with
confidence.
The general approach in finding an extrapolation function is to consider the
various effects which can lead to errors in the measured values of θ, and to
find out how these errors in θ vary with the angle θ itself.
The chief sources of error in θ are the following are Off-centering of
specimen, absorption in specimen, misalignment of the diffractometer,
unparalled X-rays, Unflat specimen surface.
Mıcrotructure of a steel
containing retained austenite
(light areas) along with
martensite.
The hardening of steel requires two operations: (1) heating to a high
temperature to form a homogeneous, face-centered-cubic solid solution
called austenite, and (2) quenching the austenite to room temperature to
transform it to a hard, metastable, body-centered-tetragonal solid solution
called martensite. In practice, the quenched steel may contain some
undissolved carbides and, because of incomplete transformation, some
austenite is often retained at room temperature. The effect of this austenite
on the service behavior of the steel is usually detrimental, but sometimes
beneficial. At any rate there is considerable interest in methods of
determining the exact amount of austenite present. Quantitative
microscopic examination is fairly satisfactory as long as the austenite
content is fairly high, but becomes unreliable below about 15 percent
austenite in many steels. The x-ray method, on the other hand, is quite
accurate in this low-austenite range, often the range of greatest practical
interest.
Assume that a hardened steel contains only two phases, martensite and
austenite. The problem is to determine the composition of the mixture,
when the two phases have the same composition but different crystal
structure.
Partial diffractometer pattern of an oil-quenched NiVsteel,containing
about 30 volume percent austenite (γ). Chromium radiation, V filter.
γ = Ostenit
α = martenzit
Assume that a hardened steel contains only two phases, martensite and austenite.
The problem is to determine the composition of the mixture, when the two
phases have the same composition but different crystal structure.
The equation is
Answer:
From equation (1):
1/1=(20.73 Vα ) / (34.78 Vγ ) ◊ Vα = 1.68 Vγ
From equation (2)
1.68 Vγ+Vγ=1 à Vγ=0.373
37.3 % retained austenite.