You are on page 1of 1

Delaying planting provides the opportuni- • No drift hazard or herbicide carry- Crop Tolerance to Flaming

ty to kill one or two ”crops” of weeds prior over to the next season.
to planting and allows the soil to warm up, • Herbicide-tolerant or -resistant weeds We have determined the tolerance level
resulting in rapid crop growth. Rapid crop are controlled. of major crops to propane flaming. De-
growth is important in reaching a size dif- • Reduced cost compared to hand pending on the tolerable crop injury level,
ferential between a larger crop plant and weeding. a propane dose could be selected to either
the weed. This size differential is required • Reduced need for repeated cultiva- control the weed, or reduce its competitive
for success with many harrow, rotary hoe, tion and the risk of new weed flushes ability against the crop. Crop susceptibility
and cultivation operations. or increased soil erosion. to propane flaming varies with species and
• Reduced need for hand weeding in growth stages.
Properly timed mowing or cutting will
organic systems. Grass crops such as field corn, popcorn,
suppress weeds but with few exceptions
will not kill them. Cutting cedar trees (or The disadvantages of flame weeding sweet corn, and sorghum are most tolerant
other plants without basal buds) below the when compared to conventional herbicides and can be safely flamed from their VE
lowest branch will kill them. Mowing tends include: (emergence) to V10 (10-leaf) growth stages,
to be more effective on broadleaf weeds with a maximum of two postemergence
• Higher equipment cost than with flaming operations per season.
than grasses since most grasses rapidly traditional herbicide applicators.
regrow from the crown. Mowing must be • Precise timing of flaming operation is Soybean is tolerant to flaming only at
carefully timed to maximize damage to the required for crop safety. the VE–VC stages (emergence to unfolded
weed and minimize damage to the crop. • Low application speed due to smaller cotyledon) and after the V4 (4 trifoliate
Physical barriers include placing black coverage. (Most flamers treat four to leaves) growth stages. Sunflower is tolerant
plastic sheeting (mulch) either on the soil eight rows, unless custom built for 16 to flaming only at the VE–VC stage (emer-
surface or beneath a surface covering of or more rows.) gence to cotyledon) and after the V8 (8-leaf)
gravel or stone. The crop or plant to be • Lack of residual weed control. growth stage. Flaming in wheat is recom-
grown is planted through a hole cut in the mended only before crop emergence.
A flame weeder may have almost the
plastic. Black plastic is important because same weed control capacity as a mechani-
it excludes sunlight from reaching weed Cost of Flame Weeding
cal cultivator, but it is usually slower than
seeds or small plants. Plastic mulch is most those used for chemical weed control. Cost of a single flaming operation
common with high value horticultural broadcast below crop canopy could be
crops. From a resource and environment point
$10-$12 per acre, excluding equipment and
of view, the high energy requirement and
labor costs. (This estimate is based on a
the release of carbon emissions could be
Propane-Fueled seen as a disadvantage; however, propane
propane cost of $1/gallon applied at a rate
of 10-12 gallons per acre.) A banded flam-
Flame Weeding combustion is relatively clean compared to
ing application (over the crop row) can
other fossil fuels, such as diesel.
cost $5-$8 per acre due to lower propane
Flame weeding is an acceptable weed
use rates (4-6 gallons per acre).
control option in organic production and Weed Response to Flame Weeding
has received renewed interest for conven-
tional cropping systems. It can be used as Based on our recent research to deter- Resources
part of an integrated pest management mine how various weed species respond
For more information on flame weed-
program not only for weeds but also for to broadcast flaming, propane doses of 10
ing:
insect control in agronomic crops. Flame to 12 gallons per acre were highly effective
weeding controls weeds by heating plant in controlling many broadleaf weeds at • Visit http://propanecouncil.org and
tissue rather than burning it. Propane burn- early growth stages (up to 10 inches tall), search for the publication, Pro-
ers can generate combustion temperatures providing over 90% control of velvetleaf, pane-Fueled Flame Weeding in Corn,
of up to 2000oF, which rapidly raises the ivyleaf morningglory, redroot pigweed, Soybean and Sunflower, by Stevan
temperature of the exposed plant tissues. common waterhemp, lambsquarters, field Knezevic et al. The 30-page manual is
The resulting thermal shock to the plant bindweed, kochia, and Venice mallow. The free.
tissue boils water molecules inside the cells same dose of propane also provided 80%
control of several grass species, including • Contact Extension Weeds Specialist
and breaks up proteins, especially in the cell Steven Knezevic at 402-472-6498
wall. The expanding water generates a pres- barnyardgrass, green foxtail, and yellow
foxtail. The weeds listed can be controlled or sknezevic2@unl.edu.
sure that ultimately ruptures the cell wall,
dehydrating the plant through cell leakage. prior to crop planting, as well as before
Eventually plants die or their competitive and after crop emergence. Summary
ability is drastically reduced. Control of perennials with flame weed- Few nonchemical methods of weed
ing can be challenging as the flame’s heat control are so effective that any one can
Pros and Cons of Flame Weeding can’t penetrate deep into the soil to destroy stand alone in providing acceptable weed
Flaming provides multiple advantages, root structures. To provide control of peren- control. An integrated weed management
such as: nial weeds, flaming will need to be repeated (IWM) program (see previous section)
several times throughout the season. incorporating multiple approaches is
• No chemical residue is left in plants,
important for success with nonchemical
soil, air, or water.
weed control.

16 © The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska–Lincoln. All rights reserved.

You might also like