You are on page 1of 1

Gulsher Khan-2681

18/04/2024
V.K. Serganj and Mahant challenged 5 in support in Delhi at the same time consonance sufficient
caused were special appeal the dully contention application is allowed special treated to have
been filed when within the time.
The Committee Management Shri Gandhi inter colleges Tarpur whould hope Gorakhpur Shri
management. It is assesment the valid of judgement of order dated 27.2.2017 Apal Mutthukund
Singh State of UP. Were learned counsel judge set aside the order date passed District Inspector
School on the premises District Inspector Schools has no authority to take a view express District
Inspector School on contrary to the allow laid down by file Bench in the case Rahil Hasan UP
order dated 11.2.2006. There background of the case amenity at difficult is that in the District of
Gorakhpur. There is Delhi are recommendation contrary Act 1986 institution of Re-management
strictly and consonance and previous assistant under Act UP 24 and 1971 UP and 1992 as well as
framed thereunder. In the institutions concerned a post of lecturer and lecture and 3.6.2011 and
party apeal muttukund should earlier has been beyond is subject expert have teaching English
and ajust of regular integrity road post State college 14.8.2007 and therefore said claims being
according promotion and as nothing their being contend writ petition no. 3655,2016 has been
filed before this court and 55,2016 this court directed for consideration and claim of petition an
opposite party. Persuent to the said order passed by this court. The District Inspector School
started undertaking the starte appeal muthukund Singh was not at eligible as he has not complete
continence service and 5.7.2011 that is the first date of recruitment. The report in question that
has been so as submit of District Inspector School has been assailment in writ petition number
7051 of 2017 and said writ petition was allowed of 14.2.2017 a matter remained the District
Inspector School in insuring compliance of earlier prayer dated 11.5.2002 and 2016 and District
Inspector School was once again that petition opposite party contend fulfil requisite minimum
qualification. Against the said judgement the order present special appeal has been file before
this court.
Shri Rahul Jain learned counsel for the appellant has content his with and that in the present case
a writ petition has wrongly being writ petition opposite party was not at fulfil minimum
qualification permitted on the post of lecturer and Sanskrit and special deserve to be followed.
Shri Anil Kumar Yadav opposite party on the other hand has contended that rightful order by the
learned single judge and no interference be made by this court.
After this representative argument the factual on which there is no disputes the petitioner
opposite party has been any promotion on the basic of lecturer Sanskrit at Shri Gandhi inter
colleges Harpur buddha Gandhi and Gorakhpur under the provisions of UP Act no.2 and 1921.
Wherein selection by way of appointment and by way of promotion was to be made strictly in
consonance with the provision has contend under UP Act 5 1982.

You might also like