Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 and The
Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Rules, 2002 deal with
registration and better protection of geographical indications relating to goods. The primary
purpose of this Act is to provide legal protection to Indian Geographical Indications which in
turn boost exports. Registration of Geographical indication promotes economic prosperity of
producers of goods produced in a geographical territory.
According to the Act, the term ‘geographical indication’ (in relation to goods) means “an
indication which identifies such goods as agricultural goods, natural goods or manufactured
goods as originating, or manufactured in the territory of a country, or a region or locality in
that territory, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of such goods is
essentially attributable to its geographical origin and in case where such goods are
manufactured goods, one of the activities of either the production or of processing or
preparation of the goods concerned takes place in such territory, region or locality, as the case
may be”.
Definition :
Geographical Indications of Goods are defined as that aspect of industrial property which
refers to the geographical indication referring to a country or to a place situated therein as
being the country or place of origin of that product.
It is an indication
It originates from a definite geographical territory.
It is used to identify agricultural, natural or manufactured goods
The manufactured goods should be produced or processed or prepared in that
territory.
It should have a special quality or reputation or other characteristics
Any question arising as to the class within which any goods fall or the definite area in respect
of which the geographical indication is to be registered or where any goods are not specified
in the alphabetical index of goods published shall be determined by the Registrar whose
decision in the matter shall be final.
The registration of a geographical indication is not compulsory; however, it offers better legal
protection to facilitate an action for infringement. The registered proprietor and authorized
users can initiate infringement actions. The authorized users can exercise the exclusive right
to use the geographical indication. The registration of a geographical indication is valid for a
period of 10 years. It can be renewed from time to time for further period of 10 years each. If
a registered geographical indication is not renewed it is liable to be removed from the
register.
II. Fees
1. Fees may be paid in cash or sent by money order or by a bank draft or by a cheque.
2. Bank Drafts or cheques should be crossed and be made payable to the Registrar at the
appropriate office of the Geographical Indication Registry.
3. It should be drawn by a scheduled bank at the place where the appropriate office of the
Geographical Indications Registry is situated.
4. Where a document is filed without fee or with insufficient fee such document will be
deemed to have not been filed.
III. Sizes
1. All applications should be typewritten, lithographed or printed in Hindi or in English.
2. It should in large and legible characters with deep permanent ink upon strong paper, on one
side only.
3. The size should be approximately 33 cms by 20 cms and shall have on the left and part
thereof a margin of not less than 4 centimeters.
GI in India
•The Central Government of India has established the Geographical Indications Registry with
all India jurisdiction in chennai
•The GI Act is being administered by the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade
Marks ‐ who is the Registrar of Geographical Indications
The application must be filed at the Office of the GI Registry located in Chennai
Geographical Signification of the Indication
Class of goods
Geographical Area
Details of the appearance
Particulars of the producers
Affidavit deposing the Applicant’s right to become the Registrant The Registrar will
have the Application examined.
Published in the GI journal.
Notice of Opposition within a maximum period of four months of publication in the
Journal.
If the Registrar accepts the Application then a certificate of registration issued.
6. The statement contained in the application should also include the following:
An affidavit as to how the applicant claim to represent the interest of the association of
persons or producers or any organization or authority established under any law;
The standard benchmark for the use of the geographical indication or the industry standard as
regards the production, exploitation, making or manufacture of the goods having specific
quality, reputation or other characteristic of such goods that is essentially attributable to its
geographical origin with the detailed description of the human creativity involved, if any or
other characteristic;
The particulars of the mechanism to ensure that the standards, quality, integrity and
consistency or other special characteristic are maintained by the producers, or manufacturers
of the goods;
Three certified copies of the map of the territory, region or locality;
The particulars of special human skill involved or the uniqueness of the geographical
environment or other inherent characteristics associated with the geographical indication;
The full name and address of the association of persons or organization or authority
representing the interest of the producers of the concerned goods;
Particulars of the inspection structure;
In case of a homonymous indication, the material factors differentiating the application from
the registered geographical indications and particulars of protective measures adopted.
Advantages of GI
GIs are a marketing tool
Reputation for quality associated with place name used on labels, advertising
Can serve as source-identifiers for consumers.
Helps the producers develop consumer loyalty.
GI-identified products are believed to command higher prices
Of particular interest to developing countries
Legal protection and preventing from unauthorized use
Benefits for farmers and local producers
Boost the rural development
Reduces unfair practices of trade
Boosts the export
Preserving local culture and resources
Provides complete information to consumers
Cancellation of Registration of a GI
If the renewal is not effected within the prescribed or extended time the GI, the
name of the authorized user may be removed from the records.
Infringement of Registered GI :
A person is said to have infringed the GI if he,
1. Uses it as to mislead persons about the geographical origin of the goods
2. Uses any GI in such a manner which constitutes an act of unfair competition including
passing off. The expression “act of unfair competition” means an act of competition
contrary to honest practices in industrial and commercial matters.
3. Uses another GI which falsely represents to the persons that the goods originate in the
locality in respect of which such registered GI indicates.
As the GI is a public property, once registered, the GI Act prohibits any assignment,
liscencing, mortgaging, etc, of such GI. However the death of an authorized user his
successor in title can be brought on record. (Sec. 24)
Chapter VIII of the Act details certain acts as offences punishable by imprisonment or with
fine or with both. The legislature has taken a strong view of infringement, piracy,
falsification, misrepresentation and has now made them penal offences. The chapter apart
from listing penalties for the above-mentioned offences also details the penalty and procedure
of prosecution.
The Act also provides that falsely representing a GI mark as registered shall be punishable
with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine or with both.
The punishment for an offence again convicted ie for second and subsequent shall not be less
than one lakh rupees and which may be extended upto two lakh rupees. (Sec 40)
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is the global forum for intellectual
property services, policy, information and cooperation.
Role of WIPO
It is an international organization dedicated to ensuring the rights of creators and owners of
the intellectual property are protected worldwide, and the inventors and authors are thus
recognized and rewarded for their ingenuity
Similarities
GIs are closely related to trademarks; both indicate product origin.
Both are valid for 10 years
Traditional Knowledge :
Traditional Knowledge means “the knowledge possessed by the indigenous people and
communities, in one or more societies and in one or more pattern, with, but not reserved to
art, dance and music, medicines and folk remedies, folk culture, biodiversity, knowledge and
protection of plant varieties, handicrafts, designs, literature”.
Traditional knowledge (TK) is knowledge, know-how, skills and practices that are developed,
sustained and passed on from generation to generation within a community, often forming
part of its cultural or spiritual identity.
While there is not yet an accepted definition of TK at the international level, it can be said
that:
TK in a general sense embraces the content of knowledge itself as well as traditional
cultural expressions, including distinctive signs and symbols associated with TK.
TK in the narrow sense refers to knowledge as such, in particular the knowledge resulting
from intellectual activity in a traditional context, and includes know-how, practices, skills,
and innovations.
Traditional knowledge can be found in a wide variety of contexts, including: agricultural,
scientific, technical, ecological and medicinal knowledge as well as biodiversity-related
knowledge.
Examples: Yoga, Application of turmeric, neem, Jamun, karela etc. guanyin cao
(i) Is traditional only to the extent that its creation and use are part of cultural
traditions of a community –“traditional” therefore does not necessarily mean that
the knowledge is ancient or static;
(ii) Is representative of the cultural values of the people and thus is generally held
collectively; and
(iii) Is not limited to any specific field of technology or the arts
According to one of the reports of WIPO on the subject defines “ traditional knowledge
comprises, tradition-based literary, artistic, or scientific works; performances; inventions;
scientific discoveries; designs; marks, names, and symbols; undisclosed information; and
all other tradition-based innovations and creations resulting from intellectual activity in
the industrial, scientific, literary or artistic fields”.
Types of Protection
Defensive protection aims to stop people outside the community from acquiring
intellectual property rights over traditional knowledge.
Defensive protection refers to a set of strategies to ensure that third parties do not gain
illegitimate or unfounded IP rights over TK. These measures include the amendment
of WIPO-administered patent systems (the International Patent Classification system
and the Patent Cooperation Treaty Minimum Documentation). Some countries and
communities are also developing TK databases that may be used as evidence of prior
art to defeat a claim to a patent on such TK. WIPO has developed a toolkit to provide
practical assistance to TK holders on documenting TK.
India, for example, has compiled a searchable database of traditional medicine that
can be used as evidence of prior art by patent examiners when assessing patent
applications. This followed a well-known case in which the US Patent and Trademark
Office granted a patent (later revoked) for the use of turmeric to treat wounds, a
property well known to traditional communities in India and documented in ancient
Sanskrit texts
Positive protection is the granting of rights that empower communities to promote
their traditional knowledge, control its uses and benefit from its commercial
exploitation. Two aspects of positive protection of TK by IP rights are being explored:
i. Preventing unauthorized use, and
ii..Active exploitation of TK by the originating community itself.
Some uses of traditional knowledge can be protected through the existing intellectual
property system, and a number of countries have also developed specific legislation.
However, any specific protection afforded under national law may not hold for other
countries, one reason why many indigenous and local communities as well as
governments are pressing for an international legal instrument.
The struggle that India had to undergo to nullify the patent granted to turmeric brought to the
forefront the dismal state of documentation of Indian traditional knowledge. Had there been
prior proper documentation, turmeric would not have been granted a patent in the
first place. However, better late than never, the Indian government realized the necessity for
the documentation of the valuable traditional knowledge of the country and in pursuance of
this created the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library- an integrated global bio piracy watch
system that allows for the monitoring of patent applications that seek to patent Indian medical
systems. It serves as a prior art registry and as a defensive mechanism against bio piracy.
The TKDL is a joint effort of the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research and the
Department of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy (AYUSH).
It enables effective detection of attempts to misappropriate this knowledge by third parties
filing applications with patent offices around the world
At present, while access to the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library is available to nine
International Patent Offices- European Patent Office, United States Patent & Trademark
Office, Japan Patent Office, United Kingdom Patent Office, Canadian Intellectual Property
Office, German Patent Office, Intellectual Property Australia, Indian Patent Office and Chile
Patent Office- by way of the TKDL Access (Non-Disclosure) Agreement, talks are underway
with Russia and Malaysia.
However, there has been a drawback to the TKDL. After the setting up of the TKDL, India
has challenged several claims of patent across the world. However, concerns have arisen as to
whether the money spent by India to sustain the TKDL is worthwhile. Several other countries
such as South Korea have a system similar to that of the TKDL, yet spend a fraction of the
amount spent by India.
Further, with the TKDL available only to defend India’s traditional knowledge and not being
available for further research, much is left to be desired.
Nonetheless, the establishment of the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library has indeed
demonstrated the need to protect a nation’s traditional knowledge and the advantages of
proactive action. It has also paved the way for the efforts of other countries to protect their
traditional knowledge.
India‟s TKDL, a collaborative project between the Council of Scientific and Industrial
Research (CSIR), and the Department of AYUSH, is a home-grown effort to ensure patent
offices around the world do not grant patents for applications founded on India‟s wealth of
age-old TK.
Cases on wound healing properties of turmeric, and the antifungal properties of neem
acted as stimulants for the formation of TKDL.
In the mid-1990s, turmeric became the subject of a patent dispute. A U.S. patent (no.5,
401,504) on turmeric was awarded to the University of Mississippi Medical Center in 1995,
specifically for the "use of turmeric in wound healing." Two years later, a complaint was
filed by India's Council of Scientific and Industrial Research(CSIR).
In India, where turmeric has been used medicinally for thousands of years, concerns grew
about the economically and socially damaging impact of this legal biopiracy.
CSIR argued that turmeric has been used for thousands of years for healing wounds and
rashes and therefore its medicinal use was not a novel invention.
Their claim was supported by documentary evidence of traditional knowledge, including
ancient Sanskrit text and a paper published in 1953 in the Journal of the Indian Medical
Association.
United States Patent and Trademark Office (US PTO) investigated the validity of this patent.
In 1997, despite an appeal by the patent holders, the US PTO upheld the CSIR objections and
cancelled the patent. The turmeric case was a landmark judgment case as it was for the first
time that a patent based on the traditional knowledge of a developing country was
successfully challenged.
The use of „karela, jamun, and brinjal for control of diabetes is common knowledge and
everyday practice in India. The use of these substances in the treatment of diabetes dates back
many centuries in India and is mentioned in several ancient texts on healing such as “Wealth
of India”', the “Compendium of Indian Medicinal Plants” and the “Treatise on Indian
Medicinal Plants”.
A patent number 5,900,240 was granted recently to Cromak Research Inc based in New
Jersey to a team comprising two non-resident Indian scientists Onkar S Tomer and Kripanath
Borah, and their colleague Peter Glomski. The American patent was granted on an edible
composition comprising a mixture of at least two herbs selected from the group consisting of
jamun, bitter gourd or bitter melon (Karela), and eggplant (brinjal) .
The herbal mixtures have been cited as dietary supplements and are claimed to be especially
useful for lowering the glucose level in blood among those suffering from diabetes.
The patent was challenged on the ground of prior art. However, Article 102 of the U.S. Patent
Law, which defines prior art, does not recognise technologies and methods in use in other
countries as prior art. If knowledge is new for the U.S., it is novel, even if it is part of an
ancient tradition of other cultures and countries.. Because of this, the Jamun could be
patented in the USA. But it does created hue and cry in India for such a patent as it was
considered to be a biopiracy i.e. theft of Indian TK.
1.Hoodia Cactus and San Tribe of Africa- This plant is used as an appetite suppressant forms
the part of the TK of San people.
2. Ayhuasca meaning wine of the soul. Is a ceremonial drink prepared by the tribes in the
Amazon Basin from bark of the tree named Banisteriopsis Caapi . It is also used in the
process of treatment of certain ailments.
3. Maca and the tribes of Peru- It is a plant of radish and mustard family believed to have
been first domesticated in Junin(Peru) 1300 to 2000 years ago. It is used as health drink with
or without fruits and vegetables to improve fertility and sexual functions.
4. Jeevani and Kani Tribe in Kerala: Jeevani is a medicinal plant used as an anti stress, anti
fungal, revitalize and immune- enhancer drug by Kani Tribals. Another plant called
Arogyapaach for its medicinal effects since time immemorial.
CONCLUSION
•Globalization have caused misuse of traditional knowledge for monopolistic rights and the
ultimate profit from its sales.
•So there is a strict need of awareness for the traditional procedures and knowledge.
•Documentation activities undertaken by developing countries like India are worth
recognition.
•Therefore the protection, conservation and preservation of the traditional knowledge and its
practice and culture should be of major concern.
•In order to prevent the misuse by unauthorized parties of traditional knowledge and
promotion of its use and its importance in development
Negotiations on an international legal instrument are taking place within the WIPO
Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional
Knowledge and Folklore. In some countries, sui generis legislation has been developed
specifically to address the positive protection of TK. In addition, providers and users may
also enter into contractual agreements and/or use existing IP systems of protection
-----*****-----