Professional Documents
Culture Documents
government Kersh
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/by-the-people-debating-american-government-kersh/
Electoral College Votes in the 2016 Presidential Election
Clinton Trump
Electoral Votes 232 306 Electoral Votes
0 269 0
270 Needed to win
Geographic view WA
12 NH 4 ME
MT ND VT 3 3
3 3 1
OR ID MN
7 SD 10 WI NY MA 11
4 29
3 10 MI RI 4
WY
IA 16
3 NE PA 20 CT 7
NV 6 OH
5 IL IN NJ 14
5 UT 18 WV
CA
CO 20 11 DE 3
5 KS MO 5 VA 13
9
55 6 KY 8 MD 10
11
NC 15 DC 3
AZ OK TN 11
NM AR SC 9
10 7
5 6 GA
MS AL
6 9 16
AK TX LA
3 38 8
FL
HI 29
4
Senate
House Senate
Democrats 193 47
Republicans 240 51
115th United States
Women 83 21
Congress
Men 352 79
House of Representatives
Republicans Democrats
Independents Undecided
ROGAN KERSH
Wake Forest University
THIRD EDITION
BY THE PEOPLE
DEBATING AMERICAN GOVERNMENT
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Richard O’Donnell
Murray Dry
Jim Barefield
Rogers Smith
F
our score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this
continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the
proposition that all men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any
nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a
great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that
field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that
nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate—we can not consecrate—we can
not hallow—this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled
here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The
world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never
forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here
to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly
advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining
before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that
cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here
highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation,
under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the
people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
15 Bureaucracy 448
vii
The Rise of American Nationalism 119 Fighting Terrorism and Protecting Liberty 154
America’s Weak National Government 119 Contacts with Forbidden Groups 154
COMPARING NATIONS 4.1: Government Spending Surveillance 155
as a Proportion of Gross Domestic Product 120
Size 120 Conclusion: The Dilemma of Civil Liberties 156
Authority 120 Chapter Summary 156 Study Questions 157
Independence 121
xii
xiii
Chapter Summary 446 Study Questions 447 Conclusion: The Real Solution Lies with You 477
Chapter Summary 478 Study Questions 479
15 Bureaucracy 448
BY THE NUMBERS The Bureaucracy 451 16 The Judicial Branch 480
How the Bureaucracy Grew 451
Who Are We? A Nation of Laws . . .
Birth of the Bureaucracy 451
War 452
and Lawyers 482
Embracing the Law—and Lawsuits 482
Morality 452
BY THE NUMBERS The U.S. Judiciary 483
Economics 452
Declining Trust 483
Geography 453
Courts in American Culture 484
Race/Ethnicity 453
COMPARING NATIONS 16.1: Number of Lawyers,
The Bureaucratic Model 453
Per Capita 484
Hierarchy 453
Division of Labor 454 Organizing the Judicial Branch 485
Fixed Routines 454 Divided We Rule 485
Equal Rules for All 455 State and Local Courts 486
Technical Qualifications 455 Judicial Selection 486
xv
xvii
At first, they came in small numbers: one child, two children, a few huddled together.
Then a surge: In the spring and summer of 2014, more than 63,000 unaccompa-
nied minors crossed the Mexican border into the United States. The exhausted
children—mostly from Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador—faced poverty and
violence at home. Their exodus was a humanitarian tragedy. But it was also a political
problem.
Conservative critics of the Barack Obama administration slammed the White
House for not acting sooner to stem the tide and for being “soft on immigration.”
Donald Trump launched his long-shot presidential bid, a year later, with a tough
attack on undocumented migrants. From the left, another set of voices condemned
the president for not providing services to children whose families were so desper-
ate they would send them alone across dangerous ground to an uncertain destiny.
Whatever course the administration took, it faced angry rebukes.
As partisans traded insults and pundits criticized the government’s mistakes,
something remarkable happened: Americans of all backgrounds—urban and rural,
churched and secular, liberal and conservative—came together to help the children.
College students and local residents joined to hand out medical kits and food pack-
ets. Lawyers flew in to offer free legal assistance in securing asylum. Church leaders
created makeshift shelters and organized short-term housing among the congre-
gants. One bishop in San Antonio, Texas, said the crisis had deepened his prayer
life. This is a classic story that runs right through American history: People pull
together in the face of troubled times.
Help or Clash?
That’s the United States in a nutshell. People pitch in. This is a nation of joiners and xix
helpers and activists. It always has been. Visitors in the nineteenth century were
astonished by the nation’s civic spirit. To this day Americans form book groups,
organize car washes to raise money for good causes, stack sandbags during floods,
send checks to the Red Cross, support the military, and insist that the government
help those who need help. “We are inevitably our brother’s keeper because we are
our brother’s brother,” wrote Martin Luther King. “Whatever affects one directly
affects all indirectly.”1
But that’s only one side of the story. Stream a news show and what do you see?
Fights! A few years ago, one of us (Jim) was about to go on a news show to discuss the
fallout after singer Janet Jackson inadvertently (and very briefly) went X-rated during
the Super Bowl halftime show. Jim was scheduled alongside another commentator who
was very agitated about Jackson’s behavior and believed that it signaled the decline of
America. Jim told the producer that, after exploring our different views, it would be
great if we could find some common ground. No way, retorted the producer, who ex-
plained her ideal closing shot: You’ll be shouting over each other on a split screen while
the host coolly ends the segment by saying, “We’ll have to leave it there for now, but feel-
ings run high and we’ll be hearing a lot more on this topic.” Unfortunately, searching for
common ground does not draw an audience like people screaming onscreen.
The producer was demonstrating another side of America: rugged individual-
ists who push their own views and self-interests. Individualism is also an
all-American story. Its origins lie in a frontier culture that expected everyone to
watch out for themselves. This is the America that resents anyone—especially the
government—telling people what to do.
Which is the real America? They both are. Sometimes this is a land of coopera-
tion, sometimes a nation of competition. American politics, as you will see, reflects
both views.
By the People?
We picked the book’s title—By the People—because Lincoln’s phrase raises the
deepest question in American politics: Who has the power? Or to put it more point-
edly, do the people rule in this day and age? Democracy is a constant struggle; it is
an aspiration, a wish, a quest. In every chapter we’ll ask how well A
mericans are
living up to Lincoln’s ideal. Does the new media (Chapter 9) or the contemporary
Congress (Chapter 13) or the bureaucracy (Chapter 15) or state government (Chap-
ter 4) support or subvert government by the people? We’ll present the details—and
let you decide whether we should press for reform or leave things alone.
We’ll be straight with you: We won’t pretend there was a golden age in some
imaginary past. After all, the United States has been home to political machines
that enthusiastically stole votes, maintains an Electoral College designed to dis-
tort the people’s vote for president, and governs through an elaborate system of
checks and balances that blunts the popular will. (Again, you’ll soon see two sides
to each of these features of American government.) At the same time, you’ll read
about bold popular movements and unexpected electoral surges that changed the
face of the nation. In many ways, these are the most exciting moments in Ameri-
can history. They spring up at unexpected times, inspiring ordinary people to
achieve great things. Does Donald Trump’s election signify such a surge? Or are
the protest movements that have sprung up the larger agent of change? Read on
and you’ll be able to answer those questions—and many more.
1
Where Do We Go from Here: Chaos or Community? (New York: Harper & Row, 1967) 181.
The twenty-first century adds a 24/7 news cycle with commentary all the time and
from every angle.
Turn to foreign policy, where high principles contend with tough-minded real-
ism in a fractious world. When the most formidable military in human history is
mustered into action, watch presidential power expand so rapidly that it sets off
international debates about whether the great republic is morphing into an empire.
In Short
As you read this book, you’ll repeatedly encounter four questions:
• Who governs? This is the question of democracy and power—or, as we
phrased it earlier: Is this government by the people? And if and where it falls
short, how might we refresh our democracy?
• How does American politics work? Our job is to make you think like a
political scientist. What does that involve? You’ll learn in the next chapter—
and throughout the book.
• What does government do? You can’t answer the first two questions if you
don’t know what the courts or the White House or Congress or interest
groups actually do—and how they do it.
• Who are we? Americans endlessly debate America’s identity. We are
students, businesspeople, Hispanics, seniors, Texans, environmentalists,
gays, Republicans, Democrats, Christians, Muslims, military families—and
the list goes on. Sometimes it adds up to one united people; at other times
we’re left to wonder how to get along. Either way, American politics rises up
from—and shapes—a cacophony of identities and interests.
• Provided updated and new statistics on the growing income gap and its po-
litical ramifications including a new graph showing that the middle class is
losing ground relative to upper and lower classes, an analysis of current views
of the American Dream, and assessment of the NAFTA and TTIP debates.
• Incorporated new data on millennial trends regarding party affiliation, at-
titudes, and involvement in the types of participation.
• Added coverage of government-sponsored cyberwarfare.
• Revised terrorism coverage extensively alongside new discussions of the role
of the media and the handling of recent terrorist attacks in light of bureau-
cratic pathologies and updated discussions on contact with forbidden
groups, the reauthorization of the Patriot Act, and the ending of the NSA’s
collection of telecommunication data.
• Added new section on in-depth analysis of how far we have come in granting
civil rights by examining voting rights, income, poverty rates, health, life ex-
pectancy, and incarceration rates. This highlights the Supreme Court ruling
on the Voting Rights Act and voter turnout.
• Switched the order of Chapters 7 and 8 to better integrate concepts of politi-
cal socialization and public opinion shifts into our understanding of trends
in political participation.
Getting Involved
By the People is a new approach to courses in American government. The book
displays U.S. politics and government in all its glory, messiness, and power. Like
every textbook, this one informs our readers. But, as we hope you can already see,
we don’t describe government (or ideas about government) as inert and fixed.
What’s exciting about American politics, like the nation itself, is how fast it changes.
And the constant, endless arguments about what it is and what it should be next.
Our aim is to get you engaged—whether you already love politics, are a complete
newcomer to government, or whether you are a newcomer to the United States
itself. In the pages that follow, we’ll bring American government to life. Get ready
to start a great debate . . . about your future.
One final word: We’ve been working out the story line for this book throughout
our teaching careers. We’ve taught everything from very large lectures to small
seminars. Like all teachers, we’ve learned through trial and error. We’ve worked
hard to pack this book with the stories, questions, and features that all our students
have found effective. That spirit—the lessons we’ve learned in the classroom—
animates everything that follows.
• NEW—Redistricting in “Texachusetts”
• NEW—Saving the Electric Car
• Election Reform
• NEW—Fact-checking the Media
• NEW-Passing the Thirteenth Amendment
• NEW—Negotiating with China
NEW—A Closer Look Media Tutorials: Available on Dashboard and on the By the
People, Third Edition, Free and Open Companion Website (www.oup.com/us/
morone), these activities are designed to teach key concepts and help students
master important, High-interest class material. Each tutorial runs 3–5 minutes and
ends with assessment opportunities students to test what they know. Topics include:
• The Constitution: A Brief Tour
• Civil Rights: How does the Fourteenth Amendment ensure equal rights for
all Citizens?
• Federalism: What does it mean to Incorporate the Bill of Rights?
• Political Participation: What affects voter turnout?
• Media: How is the news shaped by agenda setting, framing, and profit bias?
• Interest Groups: What is a Political Action Committee (PAC), and what
makes some PACs Super PACs?
• Congress: Why do we hate Congress but keep electing the same
representatives?
• The Judiciary: How do judges interpret the Constitution?
• Polling: How do we know what people know?
• Campaigns and Elections: How does gerrymandering work?
Companion website at www.oup.com/us/morone: This open-access companion
website includes a number of learning tools to help students study and review key
concepts presented in the text, including learning objectives, key-concept summa-
ries, quizzes, essay questions, web activities, and web links.
Packaging Options
Adopters of By the People can package any Oxford University Press book with the
text for a twenty percent savings off the total package price. See our many trade and
scholarly offerings at www.oup.com, then contact your local OUP sales representa-
tive to request a package ISBN. In addition, the following items can be packaged
with the text for free:
• Now Playing: Learning American Government Through Film:
ISBN 9780190233358
• Williams, Research and Writing Guide for Political Science:
ISBN 9780190243548
• Dashboard: ISBN 9780190237677
We also encourage the following texts for packaging:
• Very Short Introduction Series:
–– Valelly, American Politics
–– Crick, Democracy
–– Boyer, American History
• Lindsay, Investigating American Democracy: Readings on Core Questions
• Niven, Barack Obama: A Pocket Biography of Our 44th President
• Wilkins, Questioning Numbers: How to Read and Critique Research
Acknowledgments
When he signed us up to write this book, publisher John Challice looked us each in
the eye and said, “You know, this is going to be so much work—you’re going to be
married to us.” He was right. Yes, it was a lot of work. And yes, the Oxford team has
been like a family that carried us through the process.
There would be no book without Jennifer Carpenter, our extraordinary editor.
She guided us through the process with enormous skill. Along the way, Jen earned
the highest praise authors can give their editor: She cared about the book as much
as we did. Our development editor, Naomi Friedman, helped us so much she ought
to be considered a coauthor—she suggested, edited, cut, and cheered. Ryan Emenaker,
a political scientist at the College of the Redwoods, was a remarkable partner for
the third edition—Ryan helped us organize, research, and write. Development
manager Thom Holmes gracefully turned our messy manuscript into a tight narra-
tive bursting with special features. Assistant editor Matt Rohal guided the art pro-
gram and tracked down every picture in the following pages. Production manager
Roxanne Klaas coordinated an amazing production process; we broke the publish-
ing record for the number of times two authors wrote, “Good point!” in the margins
of an edited manuscript. Judy Ann Levine did a fine copyedit on an impossible
schedule. Art director Michele Laseau did the beautiful design. We are especially
grateful to marketing manager Tony Mathias for getting this book into your hands.
To all of you in our immediate Oxford family: Thank you! Thank you!
We had an even more important team at our side—our families and our friends.
Over the course of this book’s initial conception and subsequent writing, Rogan
moved from Syracuse University’s Maxwell School to New York University’s Wagner
School, with a sabbatical leave at Yale along the way—and then, just as we were
finishing the first edition, to Wake Forest University. Colleagues in all four places
were unfailingly generous with ideas and comments; thanks especially to Suzanne
Mettler, Jeff Stonecash, David Mayhew, Ellen Schall, Shanna Rose, and Shankar
Prasad. Because we strive throughout to get both the political science and the
practical politics right, a group of experienced and reflective inside-the-Beltway
friends cheerfully and patiently provided insight into their world: Bill Antholis,
Matt Bennett, Laura Schiller, Erik Fatemi, Tom Dobbins, Dan Maffei, Bob Shrum,
Marylouise Oates, and Don and Darrel Jodrey. Grateful thanks to them as well as
a wonderful set of current and former students, many now working in government
and politics.
By the People’s long journey to completion grew infinitely more enjoyable once
Sara Pesek joined me for the trip—through this book and everywhere else, from
Australia to Ze Café in midtown New York City. Sara’s insights into public policy
made for the liveliest newlyweds’ conversations (if you’re a politics junkie) imagin-
able; my biggest bouquet of thanks to her for that rarest of gifts: loving, fully joined
partnership.
Jim offers warm thanks to my colleagues at Brown who form a wonderful
community of scholars and teachers—always ready for coffee, lunch, or wine and a
conversation about political science. Extra thanks to Peter Andreas, Mark Blyth,
Corey Brettschneider, Ross Cheit, Elisabeth Fauquert, Alex Gourevitch, Rebecca
Henderson, Bonnie Honig, Sharon Krause, Rick Locke, Susan Moffitt, Rich Snyder,
Wendy Schiller, and Ashu Varshney. And my wonderful students sampled every idea
in this book. They are my constant teachers. Grateful thanks to Ryan Emenaker,
Dan Carrigg, Kevin McGravey, Ferris Lupino, Rachel Meade, Meghan Wilson,
Aaron Weinstein, Brandon Welch, and Cadence Willse.
Manuscript Reviewers
We have greatly benefited from the perceptive comments and suggestions of the
many talented scholars and instructors who reviewed the manuscript of By the
People. They went far beyond the call of duty in sharing thoughts and making cor-
rections. Their insight and suggestions contributed immensely to the work.
Third Edition
Bryan T. Calvin Daniel Hummel Jane Rainey
Tarrant County College, Northwest Idaho State University Eastern Kentucky University
John Carnes Nina Kasniunas Joseph Romance
Lone Star College–Kingwood Goucher College Fort Hays State University
Rosalind Blanco Cook Nicholas LaRowe Michael Romano
Tulane University University of Southern Indiana Georgia Southern University
Paul B. Davis Brad Lockerbie Jennifer Sacco
Truckee Meadows Community College East Carolina University Quinnipiac University
Michael Dichio A. Lanethea Mathews-Schultz Eric Schwartz
Fort Lewis College Muhlenberg College Hagerstown Community College
Dawn Eaton Don Mirjanian Daniel Lavon Spinks
San Jacinto College South College of Southern Nevada Stephen F. Austin State University
Kathleen Ferraiolo Carolyn Myers Jeffrey M. Stonecash
James Madison University Southwestern Illinois College Syracuse University
Ingrid Haas Hong Min Park Kathleen Tipler
University of Nebraska–Lincoln University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee University of Oklahoma
James Hite Marjorie K. Nanian Carl Wege
Portland State University Schoolcraft College Social Sciences College of Coastal
Jeneen Hobby Coyle Neal Georgia
Cleveland State University Southwest Baptist University Geoffrey Willbanks
Michael Hoover Paul Parker Tyler Junior College
Seminole State College Truman State University
Second Edition
Nathan Blank Paul Foote Ronald C. Schurin
Casper College, University of Wyoming, Eastern Kentucky University University of Connecticut
Kentucky Community & Technical Jeneen Hobby John Shively
College System Cleveland State University Longview Community College
Nichole Boutte-Heiniluoma Gary Johnson Toni-Michelle C. Travis
Jarvis Christian College Weber State University George Mason University
Blake Farrar Steven Nawara
Texas State University Valdosta State University
Jennifer Felmley Geoffrey Peterson
Santa Fe Community College University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire
First Edition
Brian A. Bearry Brian Kessel Michael Parkin
University of Texas at Dallas Columbia College Oberlin College
Emily Bentley Christopher L. Kukk Richard Pious
Savannah State University Western Connecticut State University Barnard College
R. M. Bittick Sujith Kumar Elizabeth A. Prough
Sam Houston State University University of Central Arkansas Eastern Michigan University
Wendell S. Broadwell Jr. Lisa Langenbach Wesley B. Renfro
Georgia Perimeter College Middle Tennessee State University St. John Fisher College
Allison Bunnell William W. Laverty John F. Roche, III
Fitchburg State University University of Michigan–Flint Palomar College
Frank P. Cannatelli Jeffrey Lazarus Amanda M. Rosen
Southern Connecticut State University Georgia State University Webster University
Jason P. Casellas Angela K. Lewis Anjali Sahay
University of Texas at Austin University of Alabama Gannon University
Stefanie Chambers at Birmingham Joanna Vecchiarelli Scott
Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut Gregg Lindskog Eastern Michigan University
Suzanne Chod Temple University Samuel Shelton
Pennsylvania State University Brent A. Lucas Troy University
Michael Cobb North Carolina State University Majid Shirali
North Carolina State University Thomas R. Marshall University of Nevada, Las Vegas
McKinzie Craig University of Texas at Arlington Joyce Stickney Smith
Texas A&M University A. Lanethea Mathews Hillsborough Community College,
Michael Crespin Muhlenberg College Ybor Campus
University of Georgia Vaughn May Mitchel A. Sollenberger
Amanda DiPaolo Belmont University University of Michigan–Dearborn
Middle Tennessee State University Lauri McNown Chris Soper
Stewart Dippel University of Colorado at Boulder Pepperdine University
University of the Ozarks Christina A. Medina Barry L. Tadlock
Jasmine Farrier New Mexico State University Ohio University
University of Louisville Patrick R. Miller Edwin A. Taylor, III
Michaela Fazecas University of Cincinnati Missouri Western State University
University of Central Florida Michael K. Moore Delaina Toothman
Joseph J. Foy University of Texas at Arlington Texas State University
University of Wisconsin–Parkside Roger Morton Jan P. Vermeer
Megan Francis California State University, Nebraska Wesleyan University
Pepperdine University Long Beach Jennifer E. Walsh
Rodd Freitag Yamini Munipalli Azusa Pacific University
University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire Florida State College at Jacksonville Donn Worgs
Joseph Gardner Gary Mucciaroni Towson University
Northern Arizona University Temple University Larry L. Wright
David Goldberg Jason Mycoff Florida A&M University
College of DuPage University of Delaware Shoua Yang
Frederick Gordon Steven Nawara St. Cloud State University
Columbus State University Valdosta State University Mike Yawn
Jeff Harmon Anthony Neal Sam Houston State University
University of Texas at San Antonio Buffalo State College Melanie C. Young
Jeneen Hobby Mark Nicol University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Cleveland State University Saginaw Valley State University Khodr M. Zaarour
Mark S. Jendrysik Stephen A. Nuño Shaw University
University of North Dakota Northern Arizona University
Marketing Reviewers
Oxford University Press would also like to acknowledge the contribution of addi-
tional scholars and instructors who class tested and provided their assessment of
the completed manuscript, using this work with hundreds of students in class-
rooms across the nation.
Second Edition
Ted Anagnoson Kevin Davis Donna Merrell
University of California, Santa Barbara North Central Texas College—Corinth Kennesaw State University
Steven Bayne Dennis Driggers Patrick Moore
Century College California State University, Fresno Richland College
Joshua Berkenpas Paul Gottemoller Martha Musgrove
Western Michigan University Del Mar College Tarrant County College—Southeast
Jeff Bloodworth Sara Gubala Campus
Gannon University Lamar University Michael Petersen
Theodore C. Brown Dan Guerrant Utah State University
Virginia State University Middle Georgia College Mikhail Rybalko
Kim Casey Timothy Kersey Texas Tech University
Northwest Missouri State University Kennesaw State University Joanna Sabo
Jay Cerrato Michael Latner Monroe County Community College
Bronx Community College California Polytechnic State University Hayden Smith
Ericka Christensen Maruice Mangum Washington State University
Washington State University Texas Southern University
First Edition
Gayle Alberda Deborah Ferrell-Lynn Richard Krupa
Owens Community College University of Central Oklahoma Harper College
Herrick Arnold Paul Foote Christine Lipsmeyer
Orange Coast College Eastern Kentucky University Texas A&M University
Alex L. Avila Peter L. Francia Brent Lucas
Mesa Community College East Carolina University North Carolina State University
John Barnes Rodd Freitag Margaret MacKenzie
University of Southern California University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire San Jacinto College
Charles Barrilleaux Fred Gordon Jason McDaniel
Florida State University Columbus State University San Francisco State University
Ronald Bee John I. Hanley John Mercurio
Cuyamaca College Syracuse University San Diego State University
Michael Berkman Jeff Hilmer Melissa Merry
Pennsylvania State University Northern Arizona University University of Louisville
Angelina M. Cavallo Jeneen Hobby Roger Morton
San Jacinto College Cleveland State University California State University,
Adam Chamberlain Ronald J. Hrebenar Long Beach
Coastal Carolina University University of Utah Gary Mucciaroni
Matt Childers Mark Jendrysik Temple University
University of Georgia University of North Dakota Adam J. Newmark
Benjamin Christ Aubrey Jewett Appalachian State University
Harrisburg Area Community University of Central Florida Randall Newnham
College Gary Johnson Pennsylvania State University
Diana Cohen Weber State University Roger Nichols
Central Connecticut State University Michelle Keck Southwestern College
Paul M. Collins The University of Texas at Anthony J. Nownes
University of North Texas Brownsville University of Tennessee, Knoxville
William Corbett William Kelly Anthony O’Regan
New Mexico State University Auburn University Los Angeles Valley College
Mark Ellickson John Klemanski Kenneth O’Reilly
Missouri State University Oakland University Milwaukee Area Technical College
Finally, thanks to you for picking up this book. We hope you enjoy reading it as
much as we did writing.
Jim Morone and Rogan Kersh
●●President Trump and Vice President Pence greet supporters after winning the 2016 election.
3
3. What does government do? Many people view politics as dirty and see govern-
ment as a problem, or irrelevant to their lives. We will show you how politics can
be honorable, and why government is often important, even essential. By the
time you finish this book, you will have the tools to make informed judgments
about what public officials actually do and whether government is a problem,
a solution . . . or perhaps a bit of both.
4. Who are we? In a rapidly changing, diverse, immigrant nation, this may be the
deepest question of all. American politics helps define who we are—as a commu-
nity, a people, and a nation.
Before we examine these four questions, we want to share our bias: We love politics.
We think there is nothing more interesting—not Kanye West, not Game of Thrones, not
the Super Bowl. Actually, all those involve politics too. We aim to project the excitement
of politics and power and democracy. We will brief you on basic facts, then ask you to
ponder some key questions and join in the debates. And we will suggest many ways
that you can get involved in the pageant of American politics.
Who Governs?
As Benjamin Franklin left the Constitutional Convention in 1787, a woman
stopped him. “What kind of government have you given us?” she asked. According
to legend, the wise old Franklin responded, “A republic, madam—if you can keep
it.” The United States organized itself around a ringing declaration of popular
rule: Governments derive “their just powers from the consent of the governed,” as Republic: A government
the Declaration of Independence declares. In a republic, the people are in charge. in which citizens rule
The Constitution drives home this point in its first three words: “We the People.” indirectly and make
Franklin knew, however, that popular governments were extremely difficult to government decisions
through their elected
“keep.” All previous republics—such as Athens, Rome, and Florence—had col-
representatives.
lapsed. His point was that the people have to be vigilant and active if they are to
maintain control.
Popular rule in the United States was a bold breakthrough by eighteenth- see for yourself 1.1
century standards, but it certainly did not empower everyone. The Constitution
protected slavery and gave slaveholders three-fifths of a vote for every person they
kept in chains. Women could not vote, nor could most poor men, white or black.
American Indians were considered foreigners in their native land. At the heart of
Go online to see President
American history lies the long, hard struggle to actually live up to the republic’s
Eisenhower’s warning
founding ideals, to genuinely empower “We the People.” against the creation of a
Now that most adults finally have the right to vote (eighteen-year-olds won military–industrial complex.
the vote in 1971, though many states still deny felons the right), does the public We discuss the context
really rule? Or do the rich and powerful make most of the decisions? Americans in Chapter 18.
have always worried that ordinary people will lose control. In 1961, for example,
President Dwight Eisenhower, a Republican concerned about the size of gov-
ernment, warned that the military, its corporate suppliers, and those groups’
political friends were coming together to form a military–industrial complex.
These insiders wielded too much power, he warned, creating a juggernaut of big
government, big business, and big contracts. Eisenhower’s background gave him
special credibility: He was a five-star general who had commanded U.S. forces
during World War II.
Today, critics still charge that the very wealthy—the top 1 percent—have
stripped the people of money and influence. Comedian and political commentator
Stephen Colbert held rallies in which he mocked the Supreme Court for striking
down laws that limited contributions to political campaigns. Colbert shouted, his
voice edged with sarcasm, that the Court had ended “the tragic lack of influence”
that “corporations and billionaires and unions (but mostly corporations)” exercise
in our government.3 At the same time, many conservative Americans felt that it
was government bureaucrats and the mainstream media elites who had grabbed
the power; in response, they flocked to the Tea Party, designed to return control to
the people. In 2015, sparked by police shootings of African Americans, the Black
• Pluralist theory suggests that people can influence government through the
see for yourself 1.2 many interest groups that spring up to champion everything from fighting
global warming to banning abortions. Pluralists suggest that interest groups
give most people a voice. Competing and bargaining, interest groups are a
prime mover in many government decisions.
• Elite theory counters that power actually rests in the hands of a small
Go online to see Colbert
number of wealthy and powerful individuals—especially corporate execu-
mocking the Supreme
Court’s controversial tives and top government officials. The Tea Party, Black Lives Matter, and
decision to strike down many other movements all charged that elites were not sharing power with
election-financing laws. common people.
• Bureaucratic theory argues that real control lies with the millions of men
and women who carry out the day-to-day operations of modern government.
Here the power of most Americans to weigh in on policymaking is sidelined,
as bureaucratic experts establish policy.
• Social movement theory emphasizes the power citizens can wield when they
organize and rise up in protest—regardless of who is in control of day-to-day
politics.
Elite theory “Power elite” in government, Status based on economic influence and
corporations, and the military leadership positions
Social movement theory Protest movements The ability to persuade the rest of the country to
support their cause
What Do
You Think? Who Governs?
Political scientists’ two Pluralism! Elitism! A small Perhaps you would like to speak up for
most popular theories of Power is circle of wealthy one of the other theories. Do you prefer
power are pluralism and spread out in and powerful social movement theory, which places
elite theory. If you had to America. Any people hold most power in the hands of an active, engaged
choose between them, group can have of the control in group of citizens? If you’re not sure,
which would you pick? its say. America. don’t worry: We’re just getting started.
These theories represent very different answers to the vital question: Who
rules in America? Have we remained a republic, governed by the people? We will
often return to this question—and ask you to consider which of these theories best
describes power in the United States today. (And, yes, you’ll be able to mix, match,
and create your own.)
THE »» In a republic, power rests with the people. However, this is a difficult form of
BOTTOM
g overnment to maintain. The first question of American politics—raised in every
generation—is whether the people hold the power. Is the United States a govern-
LINE ment by the people?
Ideas
Powerful ideas shape American politics. The nation began by declaring what at the
time was a stunning idea: “All men are created equal” and “are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable rights.” In Chapter 2, we explore seven essential
ideas: liberty, democracy (or self-rule), individualism, limited government, the
American dream, equality, and faith in God. At first glance, these ideas may all
look simple, but as you will quickly learn, each has at least two very different sides.
Each idea provokes long, loud controversies about what values and policies Ameri-
cans should pursue.
Take democracy as an example. It may sound simple—government by the
people—but defining and achieving democracy in America has been a constant
Checks and balances: The struggle. The United States has seen a Constitution that limited the people’s influ-
principle that each branch ence, an elaborate system of checks and balances that blunts the popular will,
of government has the political machines that enthusiastically stole votes, and many other limits to democ-
authority to block the other racy. As one anxious delegate put it on the first day of the Constitutional Convention
branches, making it more
in 1787, “the people should have as little to do as may be about the government.
difficult for any one branch
They lack information and are constantly liable to be misled.”5 Can checking the
or individual to exercise too
much power. This system
people’s influence elevate popular rule? Americans still debate this question.
makes passing legislation Instead of embracing popular sovereignty, generation after generation of
far more difficult in the American leaders has preferred the rule of a few—the elite founders of the nation,
United States than in most expert bureaucrats trying to solve technical problems, or judges appointed for life
other democracies. who are removed from the public’s influence. All have aimed to protect government
from the tumult of the masses.
At the same time, bold popular movements and unforeseen electoral surges
have changed the nation. In many ways, these are the most exciting moments in
American history. They attract widespread attention, inspiring ordinary citizens to
achieve great things. The chapters that follow highlight moments when the United
States has reflected populist democracy, as well as periods when it has turned away
from the people. We also explore the great contested zone between democracy and
elitism, one that is often up for grabs. Ultimately, the struggle for power between the
elite few and the democratic many goes back to our first question: Who governs?
The United States bursts with entrepreneurial energy. New ideas bubble up all
the time. Many of these notions concern specific policy issues, but occasionally a
Institutions: The major reform shakes the entire political system. Ideas alone do not drive govern-
organizations, norms, ment decisions, but it is impossible to make sense of American politics without
and rules that structure understanding ideas, big and small.
government and public
action. Institutions
When most people talk about politics, they
think about individuals: President Donald
Trump, senators such as Marco Rubio (R-FL),
governors like Jerry Brown (D-CA) and Nikki
Haley (R-SC), or commentators such as Rush
Limbaugh and Rachel Maddow. Political scien-
tists, on the other hand, stress institutions—the
organizations, norms, and rules that structure
political action.
Congress, the Texas legislature, the Missoula
(Montana) City Council, the Supreme Court, and
the Department of Homeland Security are all
institutions. Why did the nation hold its breath in
2015, as the Supreme Court reviewed the Obama
administration’s healthcare reform law five years
after the president signed it? Study the rules
that govern institutions such as Congress, the
presidency, and the Supreme Court and you will
●●Students take to the streets of the capital to express their pro-life values. understand.
Interests
For many social scientists, interests are the center of the story. Political action often
flows from individuals, groups, and nations pursuing their own self-interest.
Individuals promote their interests in politics, just as they do in economic Rational-choice theory:
markets. Many political scientists rely on rational-choice theory: Members of the An approach to political
public, in this view, calculate the costs and benefits of any action to determine what behavior that views
will maximize their own self-interest. At an extreme, these “rat-choice” models individuals as rational,
decisive actors who know
hold that all political outcomes—elections, the passage of a law, even mass rallies—
their political interests
are an aggregate of the public’s individual interests.
and seek to act on them.
A more traditional view of interests focuses not on individuals but on groups.
Arthur Bentley recognized back in 1908 that interest groups had become a power-
ful force in U.S. politics. Whether they use their influence for good or for ill, they are
a permanent feature of free societies. (Remember that pluralists believe interest
groups are the central actors in American government.)
Finally, political theorists and politicians alike often seek (or claim to seek) the
public interest, the shared good of the whole society. Idealists have argued against
pandering to the interests of individuals or groups. Instead, they suggest that
government ought to pursue “the greatest good for the greatest number.” But who
decides what is the “greatest good?” This returns us to our first question: Who gov-
erns? The answer lies in who can most effectively get his or her voice heard.
In the chapters that follow, we explore all three types of interests: self-interest,
group interest, and public interest. Behavioral scientists add one more twist.
Although we may think of our own interests, including our political views, as
perfectly rational, most people exhibit a large degree of self-deception and nonra-
tional behavior. Experiments repeatedly show, for example, that many people
tend to vote for the name that appears first on a list of candidates, especially in
elections for obscure offices. Other experiments show that people do not change
their views when confronted with evidence that they are wrong—it only makes
them cling more strongly to their position. Experts are no more rational than
anyone else. Even experienced analysts are overconfident about their ability to
predict political events and outcomes—and, despite their certainty, they are often
wrong.6
Individuals
Finally, individuals influence political outcomes. This book puts special emphasis
on how ordinary people change the world. Our hope is simple: We want to inspire
you, the reader, to get involved. Here we share one example.
Marla Ruzicka was one of the first American civilians to arrive in Iraq after
the United States toppled Saddam Hussein in 2003. A self-described “civics
junkie” since high school, Marla had visited Afghanistan and seen the terrible
toll that wars could take on civilian populations. With no particular foreign
policy experience, the twenty-five-year-old established a public service organi-
zation in Iraq that she called the Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conf lict, or
CIVIC. Along with providing first aid, food, clothing, and comfort to ordinary
Iraqis injured during the war, Marla formed survey teams of volunteers that
kept a count of Iraqi civilians killed, whether by insurgents, the remnants of
Saddam’s army, or U.S. forces.
Marla’s efforts attracted attention back in Washington, where Pentagon offi-
cials initially sought to dissuade her from publicizing her count. Eventually she
received substantial support from Congress for her CIVIC efforts to aid civilian
victims in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
Marla described herself as “an ordinary American girl.” She grew up in California,
attended Long Island University, and relied on friends and well-wishers to sponsor
her initial CIVIC work.
There is a tragic note to Marla’s story: In April 2005, as she traveled to an in-
jured Iraqi’s home, her car was targeted by an explosive device, and she was killed.
We highlight Marla’s example both to honor her
memory (one of your authors was her friend) and
to emphasize the importance of individual ini-
tiative in every operation of American govern-
ment. Today, the organization she founded has
programs not only in Iraq and Afghanistan, but
also in Syria, Somalia, Mali, and other war-torn
countries. She is an example of how individuals
with a passion for political change can make a
difference in politics—and in people’s lives.
History
As the four “Is” reappear throughout this book,
you will see that we pay special attention to the
history of each. Why is an idea like freedom
powerful? Why does an institution such as Con-
●●Individuals can make a difference. Marla Ruzicka in Kabul, Afghanistan. gress look like it does? To understand you have
to know how they developed over time. While we hope you share our passion for
the drama and excitement of American history, we tell historical stories for a more
important reason. You cannot understand where the nation is, or where it might be
going, without knowing where it has been.
THE »» American political decisions are shaped by four “I” factors: ideas, institutions,
BOTTOM
interests, and individuals.
LINE »» Mastering how the four “Is” shaped politics also requires an understanding
of history.
●●The three sectors of society. Individuals engage in all three sectors: personal life when they pray, play, and raise a
family; civil society when they volunteer to clean up an oil spill; and government in all its forms—as when they help a
police officer master hop scotch.
some goal. Examples include a student government, a Bible study circle, a group of
recycling volunteers, or a business association. Finally, government involves formal
and informal institutions that make decisions for the whole society.
The lines separating these different sectors are blurry. Successful democracy
requires a vibrant civic spirit. When people join groups—even if it’s just a soccer
club or knitting circle, they get used to interacting with others and solving prob-
lems together. They develop what Alexis de Tocqueville, a French visitor to America
in 1831–1832, called the “habits of the heart”—the interchanges and projects that
build the foundation of robust democracies. Private groups foster the skills and
attitudes that make people effective citizens.8
Public–private partnership: In addition, the different sectors come together to undertake public projects.
A government program or Public–private partnerships bring private actors such as businesses together
service provided through with government officials to renovate parks, construct sports arenas, or launch
the joint efforts of private innovative schools.
sector actors (usually
businesses) and public
officials.
No Big Government!
Americans have a very active civil society. In the abstract, at least, they prefer vol-
untary groups to government action. Polls consistently reflect public disapproval
for all aspects of government: bureaucrats, the mainstream media, lobbyists, and
Congress. Today, only 24 percent of Americans trust the national government “to
do the right thing most of the time”9 (see Figure 1.1).
If Americans dislike “Big Government,” then how did we get such a thicket of
over thirteen hundred federal agencies and fifteen Cabinet departments, populated
by more than 2.2 million civilian employees? Include another nearly 2.5 million
members of the active and reserve armed forces, and you get a sprawling national
government. Add state (4.4 million) and local (12.2 million) workers alongside the
500,000 elected officials, and you get an idea of the sheer size of the U.S. government—
almost 22 million men and women who touch every aspect of our lives.
Americans have long told admiring stories about individual heroes who won
greatness on their own—free of government meddling. But the details are often
Johnson
Nixon
Ford
Carter
Reagan
Bush
Clinton
W. Bush
Obama
G.W.
80%
G.
60%
40%
20%
0%
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
●●Figure 1.1 American trust in government remains at historic lows. (Pew Research Center)
more nuanced. Take those famous inventors, the Wright brothers. Working out of
their bicycle shop, Orville and Wilbur created the first viable airplanes, opening the
path to air travel. What you may not have heard is that the Wrights were able to
develop their invention because of timely investments from their first client: the
U.S. military.10 Yes, government support was essential to launching the aviation
industry—just as it was to exploring space, creating the Internet, and building the
infrastructure we drive, walk, fly, run, and otherwise move around on every day.
And, in reality, despite the low trust in government generally, Americans give the
government high marks for specific tasks—for example, for responding to natural
disasters (79% approval), keeping the country safe from terrorism (72%), and
ensuring safe food and medicine (72%).11
Could we—and should we—shift some of the national government’s functions
to civil society and let volunteers do the work? To answer such questions, you first
have to know what government does.
Language: Finnish
Kokoelma kertoelmia
Kirj.
Fredrik Nycander
Ari Aalto
SISÄLLYS:
Esipuhe.
Nuorta väkeä.
Matka Lysekiliin.
Ei maksa vaivaa.
Pohjakalaa.
Kaksi kruunua.
Kosinta.
Vappuyö.
Keulapuolella.
Lumen alla.
Tupa.
Vahinkolaukaus.
Kun pappi kuoli.
Vanha laivuri.
Kajavia.
Vanhat neidit.
Esipuhe.
Olen nuori.
Tekijä
Nuorta väkeä.
Hän toivoi Ollille jotakin pahaa, mutta Katrinalle — ei toki, hän olisi
voinut laskea hänet puuvillapatjalle. Kun hän vain ajatteli, kuinka ne
nyt siellä seisoivat uskollisuuden lupauksia tekemässä —
varmaankin olivat he juuri lasketelleet sanat papin jälestä — kävivät
hänen kasvonsa tuskan rypistämiksi ja harmin kyynelet pakkautuivat
hänen silmiinsä.
Kummallista, että ihminen voi pitää niin paljon toisesta ja se, että
tämä ei voi välittää takasin. Sen asian laita on hullusti maailmassa!
Eikö hän, Gert, ollut sanonut Katrinalle niin monta kertaa, että hän oli
kiusallisuuteen asti rakastunut häneen, niin kerrassaan rakastunut,
että tuskin tiesi mitä tehdä — ja kuitenkin oli hänen kerrassaan
mahdotonta saada tyttö omakseen. Voiko kukaan käsittää, että hän
tahtoisi omakseen Ollin? Hänen, joka oli niin sairas pitkät ajat, niin
raihnas mies, että tuskin kykeni kyntämään, mutta ajoi mieluummin
lääkäriin. Rahoja hänellä oli tiettävästi — ajatteles, jos tyttö rahojen
takia olisi hänet ottanut. Ei, sitä hän ei voinut koskaan uskoa. Se oli
kehno ajatus, jonka paholainen oli hänessä herättänyt!
Gert puristi nyrkkiään yksinäisyydessään, ja otsasuonet hänen
lakkinsa alla paisuivat.
— Hyvää päivää!
— Hyviä ystäviä olemme me aina olleet, ja nyt voit sinä hyvin istua
alas ja saada osasi hääruoasta.
Katrina sanoi sen niin sävyisästi ja siivosti, ja Gert katsoi häneen
lempeämmin kuin koskaan ennen.
— Kaunis hän on aina ollut, sen minä kyllä tiedän — vastasi Gert
painolla.
— Gert, Gert!…
— Gert!
— Elä tee mitään hullutuksia, Gert. Minä oli pakoitettu, minä olin
pakoitettu!
— Siitä minä viis, mutta minä pidin sinusta, ja sinun olisi pitänyt
tulla minulle, kuuletkos.
— En, en.
— Kyllä, kyllä.
Mutta Olli oli hintelo eikä hänen jaloissaan ollut mitään jäntevyyttä.
Gert rupesi nauramaan niin, että koko hänen ruumiinsa vapisi.
Hän nauroi ei niin paljo tuon aviomiehen tanssille kuin sille
ajatukselle, kuinka hän tulisi peijaamaan Ollia. Ja kun Olli oli
lopettanut tanssin, meni Gert hänen luokseen ja löi hänelle kättä
oikein reilusti, niin että Ollin polvet aivan horjahtivat, ja sitten sanoi
hän, kasvot hyvää tuulta hehkuvina ja äänessä mitä toverillisin
sointu:
— Minä olen aina ollut vihainen sinulle, Olli, Mutta ei maksa olla
häijynä ja pahaa tahtovana, kuules, jos tahdot kuten minä, niin
juomme lasin yhdessä ja tulemme hyviksi ystäviksi.
Matka Lysekiliin.
— Ei, jei, älkäähän lähtekö nyt. Nuppinne eivät ole selvät — arveli
Abrahamsson.
Hän oli nähnyt unta, että joukko poikasia raapi hänen laatikkoaan.
Nyt alkoi hän ymmärtää tulleensa väärää tietä. Ja nyt tahtoi hän
herättää toisetkin.
Siinä se seisoi.
— Suusi kiinni!
Ei maksa vaivaa.