Professional Documents
Culture Documents
August 2023
1
Table of Contents
1. INITIAL ASSESSMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL PATIENTS .................................................................................... 4
2. COGNITION & AROUSAL............................................................................................................................... 8
GLASGOW COMA SCALE (GCS) ........................................................................................................................... 8
MINI-MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION (MMSE; ENG VER.)..................................................................................... 8
MINI-MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION (MMSE; HONG KONG VER.) ....................................................................... 10
ABBREVIATED MENTAL TEST (AMT; ENG VER.) .................................................................................................. 11
ABBREVIATED MENTAL TEST (AMT; HONG KONG VER.) ...................................................................................... 12
MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT (MOCA; ENG VER.) .................................................................................. 13
MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT (MOCA; HONG KONG VER. 2010) ............................................................. 14
MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT (MOCA; HONG KONG VER. 2018) ............................................................. 15
3. MUSCLE TONE ............................................................................................................................................ 17
MODIFIED ASHWORTH SCALE (MAS) ............................................................................................................... 17
4. SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION ....................................................................................................................... 18
FUGL-MYER ASSESSMENT – UPPER EXTREMITY (FMA-UE) .............................................................................. 18
FUGL-MYER ASSESSMENT – LOWER EXTREMITY (FMA-LE) .............................................................................. 21
5. BALANCE AND MOBILITY ........................................................................................................................... 23
CLINICAL TEST OF SENSORY INTERACTION AND BALANCE (CTSIB) ................................................................... 23
FUNCTIONAL REACH TEST (FRT) ....................................................................................................................... 24
TIMED-UP-AND-GO TEST (TUGT) ..................................................................................................................... 25
BERG’S BALANCE SCALE (BBS) .......................................................................................................................... 26
BALANCE EVALUATION SYSTEMS TEST (BESTEST) ............................................................................................. 30
MINI-BESTEST.................................................................................................................................................... 40
ACTIVITIES OF BALANCE CONFIDENCE SCALE (ABC SCALE; ENG VER.) ................................................................. 43
ACTIVITIES OF BALANCE CONFIDENCE SCALE (ABC SCALE; HONG KONG VER.) ..................................................... 44
6. FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITY/ MOBILITY ............................................................................................................. 45
BARTHEL ADL INDEX (BI) .................................................................................................................................. 45
MODIFIED BARTHEL ADL INDEX (MBI) .............................................................................................................. 46
FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE (FIM) ................................................................................................ 48
ELDERLY MOBILITY SCALE (EMS) ...................................................................................................................... 52
MODIFIED RIVERMEAD MOBILITY INDEX (MRMI) ............................................................................................ 53
7. GAIT AND MOBILITY................................................................................................................................... 54
MODIFIED FUNCTIONAL AMBULATION CLASSIFICATION (MFAC) .................................................................... 55
10-METER WALK TEST ...................................................................................................................................... 56
DYNAMIC GAIT INDEX (DGI) ............................................................................................................................. 57
FUNCTIONAL GAIT ASSESSMENT (FGA) ............................................................................................................ 59
8. UPPER LIMB FUNCTION AND COORDINATION ........................................................................................... 61
JEBSEN TAYLOR HAND FUNCTION TEST ........................................................................................................... 61
ACTION RESEARCH ARM TEST .......................................................................................................................... 62
PURDUE PEGBOARD TEST ................................................................................................................................ 63
MINNESOTA MANUAL DEXTERITY TEST ........................................................................................................... 63
9. DISEASE SPECIFIC ....................................................................................................................................... 64
MODIFIED HOEHN AND YAHR STAGING ........................................................................................................... 64
AMERICAN SPINAL INJURY ASSOCIATION (ASIA) .............................................................................................. 65
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR NEUROLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF SPINAL CORD INJURY (ISNCSCI) ...... 65
SPINAL CORD INDEPENDENCE MEASURE III (SCIM III) ...................................................................................... 67
SUNNYBROOK FACIAL GRADING SYSTEM ........................................................................................................ 70
2
MOTION SENSITIVITY QUOTATION .................................................................................................................. 71
DIZZINESS HANDICAP INVENTORY (DHI; ENG VER.) ........................................................................................... 72
DIZZINESS HANDICAP INVENTORY (DHI; CHI VER.) ............................................................................................ 73
10. QUALITY OF LIFE....................................................................................................................................... 74
SHORT FORM-36 (SF-36) .................................................................................................................................. 74
SHORT FORM-12 (SF-12) .................................................................................................................................. 75
WHO QUALITY OF LIFE-BREF ............................................................................................................................ 76
3
1. Initial Assessment of Neurological Patients
Name:_____________________________Sex/Age_________________________
Diagnosis: _________________________________________________________________
HPI:_______________________________________________________________________
PMH:______________________________________________________________________
Social history:_______________________________________________________________
Family support:______________________________________________________________
Communication:
Hearing: ________________________________
Visual: _________________________________
Speech: ________________________________
General Observation:_________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
General tonus:
Trunk: _______________________________________
UL: _________________________________________
LL: __________________________________________
Pain: ________________________________________________________________
Sensation:
LUL LLL RUL RLL
Tactile
Proprioception (JPS)
Proprioception
(kinaesthesia)
4
Voluntary control
Date Testing position Active control / any abnormal movement
Hip flexion
Hip extension
Hip abduction
Knee flexion
Knee extension
Ankle DF
Trunk flex/extension
Trunk elongation
Trunk rotation
Sh protraction
Sh flexion
Sh abduction
Elbow flexion
Elbow extension
Forearm sup/pron
Wrist flex/ext
Thumb opposition
Finger flexion/extension
Balance
Sitting
Response to perturbation:_____________________________________________
Standing
Time to maintain standing with feet together, tandem, single leg stance:_________
Turning: __________________________________________________________
5
Response to perturbation: _____________________________________________
Functional activities
Bridging: __________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
Sitting to standing:___________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
Transfer:___________________________________________________________
Walking:___________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
6
Orofacial function:
Swallowing:________________________________________________________
Facial movement:____________________________________________________
left right
Finger/nose
Pronation/supination
Heel/shin
Foot tapping
Major Problems
Treatment plan:
Signature of therapist:
7
2. Cognition & Arousal
Reference: Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness:
a practical scale. The Lancet, 304(7872), 81-84.
8
MINI-MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION (MMSE; Eng Ver.)
(ICF Domain: Body Structure/Function - Impairment)
Maximu Score
m score
ORIENTATION
5 ( ) What is the year season date day month?
5 ( ) Where are we? state country town hospital floor
3 REGISTRATION
( ) Name 3 objects: 1 second to say each. Then ask the patient all 3
after you have said them. Give 1 point for each correct answer.
Then repeat them until he learns all 3.
Count trials and record.
5 Serial 7’s minus from 100. 1 point for each correct. Stop after 5
( ) answers.
Alternately spell “world” backward
3 RECALL
( ) Ask for the 3 objects repeat above. Give 1 point for each correct.
9 LANGUAGE
( ) Name a pencil, and watch (2 points
Repeat the following “no, ifs, ands or buts” (1 point)
Follow a 3-stage commands: Take a paper in your right hand,
fold it half, and put it on the floor (3 points)
Read and obey the following:
CLOSE YOUR EYES (1 point)
Write a sentence (1 point)
Copy design (1 point)
Total ( )
Reference: Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a
practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of psychiatric
research, 12(3), 189-198.
9
MINI-MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION (MMSE; Hong Kong Ver.)
(ICF Domain: Body Structure/Function - Impairment)
簡短智能測驗
最高分數 分
數
5 依家係乜野日子(年份)(季節)(月份)(幾號)(星期幾)?
5 我地依家係邊喥?
(九龍/新界/香港)(九龍/新界/香港既邊度)(醫院)(邊層樓)(病房)
或: (九龍/新界/香港) (九龍/新界/香港既邊度)(邊一科診所)(診
所名字)(邊層樓)
或: (九龍/新界/香港) (九龍/新界/香港既邊度)(邊條街)(邊一
座)(邊層樓)
或: (九龍/新界/香港) (九龍/新界/香港既邊度)(邊個屋村)(中心
名字)(邊層樓)
3 我依家會講三樣野既名, 講完之後, 請你重複一次.
請記住佢地, 因為幾分鐘後, 我會叫你再講番俾我聽。
(蘋果)、 (火車) 、 (報紙). 依家請你講番哩三樣野俾我聽.
(以第一次講的計分, 一個一分; 然後重複物件, 直至全部三樣都
記住.)
5 請你用一百減七, 然後再減七, 一路減落去, 直至我叫你停為止.
(減五次後便停)
( )
或: 依家我讀幾個數目俾你聽, 請你倒轉頭講番出黎.
( ) (4 2 7 3 1 )
3 我頭先叫你記住既三樣野係乜野呀?
9 哩樣野係乜野? (鉛筆)(手錶). (2)
請你跟我講句說話(姨丈買魚腸).(1)
依家檯上面有一張紙. 用你既右手拿起張紙, 用兩隻手一齊將
紙摺成一半, 然後放番張紙檯上面.(3)
請你講任何一句完整既句子俾我聽。例如: (我係一個人)、(今
日天氣好好)。(1)
哩處有幅圖, 請你照住黎畫啦。
總分 :
拍手
Reference: Chiu, H. F., Lee, H. C., Chung, W. S., & Kwong, P. K. (1994). Reliability and validity
of the Cantonese version of Mini-Mental State Examination. East Asian Archives of
Psychiatry, 4(2), 25. 10
ABBREVIATED MENTAL TEST (AMT; Eng Ver.)
(ICF Domain: Body Structure/Function - Impairment)
The abbreviated mental test is to access elderly patients for the possibility of cognitive
impairment/dementia. The following 10 questions are put to the patient. Test includes short
term memory (Q3) and long term memory (Q1,7,8,9), attention (Q10) and orientation
(Q2,4,5,6). Each question correctly answered scores 1 point.
Questions Scores
3. Give the patient an address, and ask him or her to repeat it at the
end of the test e.g. 42 West Street
6. Can the patient recognize two persons (the doctor, nurse, home
help, etc.)
8. In what year did World War 1 begin? (Other dates can be sued,
with a preference for dates some time in the past)
Total Scores
Reference: Hodkinson, H. M. (1972). Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental
impairment in the elderly. Age and ageing, 1(4), 233-238.
Jitapunkul, S., Pillay, I., & Ebrahim, S. (1991). The abbreviated mental test: its use and
validity. Age and ageing, 20(5), 332-336.
11
ABBREVIATED MENTAL TEST (AMT; Hong Kong Ver.)
(ICF Domain: Body Structure/Function - Impairment)
Questions Scores
(Please circle:
0 = incorrect
answer 1 =
correct
answer)
1. Age (+/- 5 years) 0/1
請講出你的年齡
2. Time (nearest hour, or am/pm/night) 0/1
現在是什麼時間
3. Address for recall at the end of the test: 42 Shanghai Street 0/1
我告訴你一個地址,請你緊記。這地址是「上海街四十二號」
4. Year (+/- 1 year) 0/1
今年是甚麼年份
5. Place name 0/1
這裏是什麼地方
6. Recognition of two persons (doctor, nurse, etc.) 0/1
你認識這兩位人士嗎(在周圍任何兩位人士)
7. Date of birth (day and month) 0/1
請講出你的出生日期
8. Date of mid-Autumn festival 0/1
請講出中秋節的日期
9. Name of present Governor or Chinese leader 0/1
請講出香港特首的名字
10. Count 20-1 backwards 0/1
請由二十倒數至一
Total Scores
Others: ______________
Cut-off Value:
<6 = suggest abnormal cognitive function (e.g. delirium, dementia) (Chu et al., 1995)
<7 = considered impaired cognition in residential care setting (Lam et al., 2010)
Reference: Chu, L. W., Pei, C. K. W., Ho, M. H., & Chan, P. T. (1995). Validation of the
abbreviated mental test (Hong Kong version) in the elderly medical patient. Hong Kong Medical
Journal, 1, 207-211.
Lam, S. C., Wong, Y. Y., & Woo, J. (2010). Reliability and validity of the abbreviated mental test
(Hong Kong version) in residential care homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics
Society, 58(11), 2255-2257.
12
MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT (MoCA; Eng Ver.)
(ICF Domain: Body Structure/Function - Impairment)
Reference: Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bedirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V.,
Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA:
a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 13
53(4), 695-699.
MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT (MoCA; Hong Kong Ver. 2010)
(ICF Domain: Body Structure/Function - Impairment)
Reference: You, J. S., Chen, R. Z., Zhang, F. M., Zhou, Z. Y., Cai, Y. F., & Li, G. F. (2011). The
chinese (cantonese) montreal cognitive assessment in patients with subcortical ischemic vascular
dementia. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra, 1(1), 276-282.
14
MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT (MoCA; Hong Kong Ver. 2018)
(ICF Domain: Body Structure/Function - Impairment)
15
Reference: Wong, A., Law, L. S., Liu, W., Wang, Z., Lo, E. S., Lau, A., Wong, L. K. & Mok, V. C.
(2015). Montreal cognitive assessment: one cutoff never fits all. Stroke, 46(12), 3547-3550. 16
3. Muscle Tone
2 = More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but the
affected part is easily moved
Reference: Bohannon, R. W., & Smith, M. B. (1987). Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth
scale of muscle spasticity. Physical therapy, 67(2), 206-207.
17
4. Sensorimotor Function
18
B. WRIST support may be provided at the elbow to take or hold the starting position, no
none partial full
support at wrist, check the passive range of motion prior testing
Stability at 15° dorsiflexion elbow less than 15° active dorsiflexion dorsiflexion 0
at 90°, forearm pronated shoulder at 15°, no resistance tolerated maintains 1
0° dorsiflexion against resistance 2
Repeated dorsifexion / volar flexion cannot perform volitionally 0
elbow at 90°, forearm pronated limited active range of motion 1
shoulder at 0°, slight finger flexion full active range of motion, smoothly 2
Stability at 15° dorsiflexion elbow less than 15° active dorsiflexion dorsiflexion 0
at 0°, forearm pronated slight 15°, no resistance tolerated maintains 1
shoulder flexion/abduction dorsiflexion against resistance 2
Repeated dorsifexion / volar flexion cannot perform volitionally 0
elbow at 0°, forearm pronated slight limited active range of motion 1
shoulder flexion/abduction full active range of motion, smoothly 2
Circumduction cannot perform volitionally jerky 0
elbow at 90°, forearm pronated movement or incomplete 1
shoulder at 0° complete and smooth circumduction 2
C. HAND support may be provided at the elbow to keep 90° flexion, no support at the
none partial full
wrist, compare with unaffected hand, the objects are interposed, active grasp
Mass flexion
from full active or passive extension 0 1 2
Mass extension
from full active or passive flexion 0 1 2
GRASP
a. Hook grasp cannot be performed 0
flexion in PIP and DIP (digits II-V), can hold position but weak 1
extension in MCP II-V maintains position against resistance 2
b. Thumb adduction cannot be performed 0
1-st CMC, MCP, IP at 0°, scrap of paper can hold paper but not against tug can 1
between thumb and 2-nd MCP joint hold paper against a tug 2
c. Pincer grasp, opposition cannot be performed 0
pulpa of the thumb against the pulpa of 2- can hold pencil but not against tug can 1
nd finger, pencil, tug upward hold pencil against a tug 2
d. Cylinder grasp cannot be performed 0
cylinder shaped object (small can) can hold cylinder but not against tug can 1
tug upward, opposition of thumb and fingers hold cylinder against a tug 2
Total H (max12)
I. PASSIVE JOINT MOTION, upper extremity, sitting J. JOINT PAIN during passive motion,
position, compare with the unaffected side upper extremity
only few pronounced pain during
degrees movement or very marked some no
decreased normal
(less than 10° in pain at the end of the pain pain
shoulder) movement
Shoulder
Flexion (0° - 180°) 0 1 2 0 1 2
Abduction (0°-90°) 0 1 2 0 1 2
External rotation 0 1 2 0 1 2
Internal rotation 0 1 2 0 1 2
Elbow
Flexion 0 1 2 0 1 2
Extension 0 1 2 0 1 2
Forearm
Pronation 0 1 2 0 1 2
Supination 0 1 2 0 1 2
Wrist
Flexion 0 1 2 0 1 2
Extension 0 1 2 0 1 2
Fingers
Flexion 0 1 2 0 1 2
Extension 0 1 2 0 1 2
B. WRIST /10
C. HAND /14
D. COORDINATION / SPEED /6
Reference: Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jääskö, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975). The
post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian 20
journal of rehabilitation medicine, 7(1), 13–31.
FUGL-MYER ASSESSMENT – LOWER EXTREMITY (FMA-LE)
(ICF Domain: Body Structure/Function - Impairment)
E. LOWER EXTREMITY
I. Reflex activity, supine position none can be elicited
Flexors: knee flexors 0 2
Extensors: patellar, achilles (at least one) 0 2
Subtotal I (max 4)
II. Volitional movement within synergies supine position none partial full
Flexor synergy: Maximal hip flexion Hip flexion 0 1 2
(abduction/external rotation), maximal flexion in knee Knee flexion 0 1 2
and ankle joint (palpate distal tendons to ensure active
knee flexion). Ankle dorsiflexion 0 1 2
Extensor synergy: From flexor synergy to the hip Hip extension 0 1 2
extension/adduction, knee extension and ankle plantar
flexion. Resistance is applied to ensure adduction 0 1 2
active movement, evaluate both movement and strength Knee extension 0 1 2
(compare with the unaffected side) Ankle plantar flexion 0 1 2
Subtotal II (max 14)
V. Normal reflex activity supine position, assessed only if full score of 4 points is
hyper lively normal
achieved in part IV, compare with the unaffected side
Reflex activity 2 of 3 reflexes markedly hyperactive 0
knee flexors, 1 reflex markedly hyperactive or at least 2 reflexes lively 1
Patellar, Achilles, maximum of 1 reflex lively, none hyperactive 2
Subtotal V (max 2)
21
F. COORDINATION/SPEED, supine, after one trial with both legs, eyes closed,
marked slight none
heel to knee cap of the opposite leg, 5 times as fast as possible
Tremor 0 1 2
pronounced or unsystematic slight 0
Dysmetria
and systematic 1
no dysmetria 2
≥ 6s 2 - 5s < 2s
6 or more seconds slower than unaffected side 2-5 0
Time seconds slower than unaffected side 1
less than 2 seconds difference 2
Total F (max 6)
H. SENSATION, lower extremity hypoesthesia or
eyes closed, compare with the unaffected side anesthesia normal
dysesthesia
leg 0 1 2
Light touch foot sole 0 1 2
less than 3/4 3/4 correct or correct 100%,
correct or considerable little or no
absence difference difference
hip 0 1 2
Position
knee 0 1 2
small alterations in the
ankle 0 1 2
position great toe (IP-joint) 0 1 2
Total H (max12)
I. PASSIVE JOINT MOTION, lower extremity J. JOINT PAIN during passive motion,
supine position, compare with the unaffected side lower extremity
only few decreased normal pronounced pain during some no
degrees movement or very marked pain at pain pain
(<10° hip) the end of the movement
Flexion 0 1 2 0 1 2
Hip Abduction 0 1 2 0 1 2
External rotation 0 1 2 0 1 2
Internal rotation 0 1 2 0 1 2
Knee Flexion 0 1 2 0 1 2
Extension 0 1 2 0 1 2
Ankle Dorsiflexion 0 1 2 0 1 2
Plantar flexion 0 1 2 0 1 2
Foot Pronation 0 1 2 0 1 2
Supination 0 1 2 0 1 2
F. COORDINATION / SPEED /6
H. SENSATION /12
This test is a clinical version of the Computerized Dynamic Posturography for measuring
sensory organization. It measures the way that vision, vestibular and somatosensory
interaction for maintaining balance in standing.
General instructions: Ask the subject to remove their shoes. The subject should stand erect
without moving, feet together, looking straight ahead with arms crossed. Instruct the subject
to stand as long as possible or until the trial is over. Each trial is 30 seconds and there are 6
testing conditions (see below). Each condition is performed once. Stop timing when the
subject’s arms moved from the original position, the foot moved, the subject opened his/her
eyes during an eyes closed trial, or fall.
1. Firm surface, eyes opened 2. Firm surface, eyes closed 3. Firm surface, eyes
opened, dome
4. Soft surface, eyes opened 5. Soft surface, eyes closed 6. Soft surface, eyes opened,
dome
Reference: Shumway-Cook, A., & Horak, F. B. (1986). Assessing the influence of sensory 23
interaction on balance: suggestion from the field. Physical therapy, 66(10), 1548-1550.
FUNCTIONAL REACH TEST (FRT)
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation)
Purpose:
The Functional Reach Test is a single-item test developed as a quick screen for balance
problems and falls risk in older adults.
Equipment:
- A yard stick/ruler
- A wall
Set-up:
Attached the yard stick to a wall at shoulder height. The subject stands along the length of the
yard stick, with feet shoulder distance apart, and with one arm (hand in a fist) flexed to 90°.
The examiner takes an initial reading on the yard stick from 5-10 feet away from the patient
and views the patient from the side.
Instructions:
After obtaining an initial reading, the examiner instructs the subject to reach as far forward
along the yard stick without moving the feet and without losing balance. Record the farthest
reach attained by the subject and subtracted the final reading from the initial reading to obtain
a distance. There should be 2 practice trial, followed by 3 test trials.
Interpretation:
FR norm as reported in Duncan et al. (1990):
20-40 years old: female=15 inches male=17 inches
41-69 years old: female=14 inches male=15 inches
70-87 years old: female=11 inches male=13 inches
Reference: Duncan, P. W., Weiner, D. K., Chandler, J., & Studenski, S. (1990). Functional reach:
a new clinical measure of balance. Journal of gerontology, 45(6), M192-M197.
24
TIMED-UP-AND-GO TEST (TUGT)
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation)
Purpose:
The Timed-Up-and-Go test (TUG) was developed as a quick screening tool for detecting
balance problems affecting daily mobility in elderly individuals.
Equipment:
- Arm chair
- Tape measure
- Tape
- Stop watch
Set-up:
Positioned the chair on a stable surface or against a wall that it will not move when the
subject moves from sitting to standing. Attached a piece of tape on the floor 3 meters (10
feet) away from the chair. The subject should wear regular footwear and may use any gait
assistive device that they normally use.
Instructions:
Begin the test with the subject sitting in the chair; the subject’s back should be resting on the
back of the chair. The examiner gives the following instructions: “On the word Go you will
stand up, walk to the line on the floor, turn around and walk back to the chair and sit down.
Walk at your regular pace”. The examiner starts timing on the word “Go” and stops timing
when the subject is seated with their back on the back of the chair. An un-timed practice trial
should be given to the subject, followed by 3 test trials.
Interpretation:
Interpretations based on different resources. Some examples are:
≤ 10 seconds = Normal, very fit
11-30 seconds = Good mobility, can go out alone, mobile without an assistive device
> 30 seconds = Problems, cannot go outside alone, requires an assistive device
sit-to-stand
>
-
Reference: Mathias, S., Nayak, U. S., & Isaacs, B. (1986). Balance in elderly patients: the" get-up
and go" test. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 67(6), 387-389.
25
BERG’S BALANCE SCALE (BBS)
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation)
Name Date
Location Rater
1. Sitting to standing
2. Standing unsupported
3. Sitting unsupported
4. Standing to sitting
5. Transfers
6. Standing with eyes closed
7. Standing with feet together
8. Reaching forward with outstretched arm
9. Retrieving object from floor
10. Turning to look behind
11. Turning 360 degrees
12. Placing alternate foot on stool
13. Standing with one foot in front
14. Standing on one foot
Total
General Instructions
Please demonstrate each task and/or give instructions as written. When scoring, please
record the lowest response category that applies for each item.
In most items, the subject is asked to maintain a given position for specific time.
Progressively more points are deducted if the time or distance requirements are not met, if the
subject’s performance warrants supervision, or if the subject touches an external support or
receives assistance from the examiner. Subjects should understand that they must maintain
their balance while attempting the tasks. Poor judgment will adversely influence the
performance and the scoring.
Equipment required for testing includes a stopwatch or watch with a second hand, and a ruler
or other indicator of 2, 5 and 10 inches (5, 12 and 25 cm). Chairs used during testing should
be of reasonable height. Either a step or a stool (of average step height) may be used for
item#12.
26
Scoring Criteria
1. SITTING TO STANDING
INSTRUCTIONS: Please stand up. Try not to use your hands for support.
( )4 able to stand without using hands and stabilize independently
( )3 able to stand independently using hands
( )2 able to stand using hands after several tries
( )1 needs minimal aid to stand or to stabilize
( )0 needs moderate or maximal assist to stand
2. STANDING UNSUPPORTED
INSTRUCTIONS: Please stand for two minutes without holding.
( )4 able to stand safety 2 minutes
( )3 able to stand 2 minutes with supervision
( )2 able to stand 30 seconds unsupported
( )1 needs several tries to stand 30 seconds unsupported
( )0 unable to stand 30 seconds unassisted
If a subject is able to stand 2 minutes unsupported, score full points for sitting unsupported. Proceed to item#4.
4. STANDING TO SITTING
INSTURCTIONS: Please sit down.
( )4 sits safety with minimal use of hands
( )3 controls descent by using hands
( )2 uses back of legs against chair to control descent
( )1 sits independently but has uncontrolled descent
( )0 needs assistance to sit
* Do in both directions
e .
g
.
Plinth/chair
Two chairs (Ix armchair + 1 without armrests
5. TRANSFERS ~ x
INSTRUCTIONS: Arrange chairs(s) for a pivot transfer. Ask subject to transfer one way toward a seat
with armrests and one way towards a seat without armrests. You may use two chairs (one with and one
without armrests) or a bed and a chair.
( )4 able to transfer safely with minor use of hands
( )3 able to transfer safely definite need of hands
( )2 able to transfer with verbal cuing and/or supervision
( )1 needs one person to assist
( )0 needs two people to assist or supervise to be safe
27
7. STANDING UNSUPPORTED WITH FEET TOGETHER
INSTRUCTIONS: Place your feet together and stand without holding.
( )4 able to place feet together independently and stand 1 minutes safely
( )3 able to place feet together independently and stand for 1 minutes
with supervision
( )2 able to place feet together independently but unable to hold for 30 seconds
( )1 needs help to attain position but able to stand 15 seconds feet together
( )0 needs help to attain position and unable to hold for 15 seconds
>
-
8. REACHING FORWARD WITH OUTSTRETCHED ARM WHILE STANDING
INSTRUCTIONS: Lift arm to 90 degrees. Stretch out your fingers and reach forward as far as you
can. (Examiner places a ruler at end of fingertips when arm is at 90 degrees. Fingers should not touch
the ruler while reaching forward. The recorded measure is the distance forward that the finger reaches
while the subject is in the most forward lean position. When possible, ask subject to use both arms
when reaching to avoid rotation of the trunk).
( )4 can reach forward confidently > 25 cm (10 inches)
( )3 can reach forward > 12cm safely (5 inches)
( )2 can reach forward >5cm safety (2 inches)
( )1 reaches forward but needs supervision
( )0 loses balance while trying/requires external support
10. TURNING TO LOOK BEHIND OVER LEFT AND RIGHT SHOULDERS WHILE STANDING
INSTRUCTIONS: Turn to look directly behind you over toward left shoulder. Repeat to the right.
Examiner may pick an object to look at directly behind the subject to encourage a better twist turn.
( )4 look behind from both sides and weight shifts well
( )3 looks behind one side only, other side shows less weight shift
( )2 turns sideways only but maintains balance
( )1 needs supervision when turning
( )0 needs assists to keep from losing balance or falling
both directions
TURN 360 DEGREES ~ Turn
in
11.
INSTRUCTIONS: Turn completely around in a full circle. Pause. Then turn a full circle in the other
direction.
( )4 able to turn 360 degrees safely in 4 seconds or less each side
( )3 able to turn 360 degrees safely one side only in 4 seconds or less
( )2 able to turn 360 degrees safely but slowly
( )1 needs close supervision or verbal cuing
( )0 needs assistance while turning
-
~ The
step should be arranged in front of the
furniture
12. PLACING ALTERNATE FOOT ON STEP OR STOOL WHILE STANDING UNSUPPORTED
INSTRUCTIONS: Place each foot alternately on the step/stool. Continue until each foot has touched the
>
A
-
safety
step/stool four times. & whole feet on the step
( )4 able to stand independently and safely and complete 8 steps in 20 seconds
( )3 able to stand independently and complete 8 steps >20 seconds
( )2 able to complete 4 steps without aid with supervision
( )1 able to complete >2 steps needs minimal assist
( )0 needs assistance to keep from falling/unable to try
28
side
good in front ; badside at the back
~ : we
usually keep balance with the leg at the back
13. STANDING UNSUPPORTED ON FOOT IN FRONT
INSTURCTIONS: (DEMONSTRATE TO SUBJECT) ESE mark YAP
Place one foot directly in front of the other. If you feel that you cannot place your foot directly in front,
try to step far enough ahead that the heel of your forward foot is ahead of the toes of other foot. (To
score 3 points, the length of the step should exceed the length of the other foot and the width of the
stance should approximate the subject’s normal stride width)
(
(
(
)4
)3
)2
able to place foot tandem independently and hold 30 seconds
able to place foot ahead of other independently and hold 30 seconds
able to take small step independently and hold 30 seconds
a
DID 3
DID
add
( )1 needs help to step but can hold 15 seconds
( )0 loses balance while stepping or standing n
56 = Functional balance
<45 = Individuals may be at greater risk of falling
Reference: Berg, K., Wood-Dauphine, S., Williams, J. I., & Gayton, D. (1989). Measuring balance
in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada, 41(6), 304-311.
Berg, K., Wood-Dauphine, S., Williams, J. I., & Maki, B. (1993). Measuring balance in the elderly:
Validation of an instrument (Dissertation). Montreal, Canada: McGill University.
29
BALANCE EVALUATION SYSTEMS TEST (BESTest)
(ICF Domains: Body Structure/Function & Activity – Impairment & Functional Limitation)
BESTest
Balance Evaluation – Systems Test
Fay Horak PhD Copyright 2008
EXAMINER NAME
Tools Required
Stop watch
Measuring tape mounted on wall for Functional Reach test
Approximately 60 cm x 60 cm (2 X 2 ft) block of 4-inch, medium-density, Tempur® foam
10 degree incline ramp (at least 2 x 2 ft) to stand on
Stair step, 15 cm (6 inches) in height for alternate stair tap
2 stacked shoe boxes for obstacle during gait
2.5 Kg (5-lb) free weight for rapid arm raise
Firm chair with arms with 3 meters in front marked with tape for Get Up and Go test
Masking tape to mark 3 m and 6 m lengths on the floor for Get Up and Go
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Reference: Horak, F. B., Wrisley, D. M., & Frank, J. (2009). The balance evaluation systems test
(BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Physical therapy, 89(5), 484-498.
39
MINI-BESTest
(ICF Domains: Body Structure/Function & Activity – Impairment & Functional Limitation)
g
do on both sides ,
do two trials for each side ,
score with better performance
between both side)
Total score with poor performance : Left .
vs Right /compared
buse
poorer performance K5s
R .: 21s
↳
tAPI-IEE E-AGP tipAD/EB E
·
= #D E
D V
I marks
=
X realignment
40
demonstrate
Isinch
9 inch ! I4inch
either 8 or 10 inch
At
41
↳
Reference: Franchignoni, F., Horak, F., Godi, M., Nardone, A., & Giordano, A. (2010). Using
psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation System’s Test: the mini-
BESTest. Journal of rehabilitation medicine: official journal of the UEMS European Board of
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 42(4), 323. 42
ACTIVITIES OF BALANCE CONFIDENCE SCALE (ABC Scale; Eng Ver.)
(ICF Domain: Participation – Participation Restriction)
Instructions: For each of the following activities, please indicate your level of balance
confidence by choosing one of the points on the scale below from 0% to 100%.
If you do not currently do the activity, try and imagine how confident you would be if you
had to do the activity. If you normally use a walking aid to do the activity or hold onto
someone, rate your confidence as if you were using these supports. If you have any
questions, please ask the administrator.
0% 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%
No Confidence Completely Confident
"How confident are you that you can maintain your balance and remain steady when
you....
1. walk around the house? ____%
2. walk up or down stairs? ____%
3. bend over and pick up a slipper from the front of a closet floor? ____%
4. reach for a small can off a shelf at eye level? ____%
5. stand on your tip toes and reach for something above your head? ____%
6. stand on a chair and reach for something? ____%
7. sweep the floor? ____%
8. walk outside the house to a car parked in the driveway? ____%
9. get into or out of a car? ____%
10. walk across a parking lot to the mall? ____%
11. walk up or down a ramp? ____%
12. walk in a crowded mall where people rapidly walk past you? ____%
13. are bumped into by people as you walk through the mall? ____%
14. step onto or off of an escalator while holding onto a railing? ____%
15. step onto or off an escalator while holding onto parcels such that you cannot hold onto
the railing? ____%
16. walk outside on icy sidewalks? ____%
Scoring: Total the ratings (possible range = 0 to 1600) and divide by 16 (or the number of
items completed; minimum of 12) to get each person’s ABC score. If a person qualifies
his/her response to items #2, #9, #11, #14, or #15 (e.g., "up" versus "down"), use the lowest
confidence rating of the two (as this will limit the entire activity). Total scores can be
computed if a person answers at least 12 of the 16 items (Myers et al., 1998).
To examine change, the scale must be administered at least twice (e.g, pre/post therapy) and
scores compared. Do not simply ask clients if their confidence has increased or decreased.
Reference: Myers, A. M., Fletcher, P. C., Myers, A. H., & Sherk, W. (1998). Discriminative and
evaluative properties of the activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. The Journals of
Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 53(4), M287-M294.
Powell, L. E., & Myers, A. M. (1995). The activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. The
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 50(1), M28-M34.
43
ACTIVITIES OF BALANCE CONFIDENCE SCALE (ABC Scale; Hong Kong
Ver.)
(ICF Domain: Participation – Participation Restriction)
ABC 活動平衡信心評分表
0% 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%
無信心 絕對信心
計分表
當你做下面嗰啲活動嘅時候,你有幾多信心你可以保持平衡同埋穩定
日期
活動項目 分數
1. 喺屋裡面行嚟行去
2. 上落樓梯
3. “嗚”低身喺地下度執起隻拖鞋
4. 喺個架度,攞一個擺喺你頭咁高嘅罐頭
5. 趷高腳,去攞高過你頭頂D嘢
6. 企喺櫈上面攞嘢
7. 掃地
8. 行出屋企,去附近搭車
9. 上落你搭慣嘅交通工具
10. 穿過停車場去商場
11. 行上或者行落條短斜坡
12. 喺一個好迫,同埋周圍D人又行得好快嘅商場裡面行
13. 喺商場度行嘅時侯,俾人撞落你度
14. 捉住條扶手,踏入或者踏出扶手電梯
15. 拎住D嘢,手又冇得扶住,踏入或者踏出扶手電梯
16. 行出出便,濕滑嘅地面
總分
訪問員
Reference: Mak, M. K., Lau, A. L., Law, F. S., Cheung, C. C., & Wong, I. S. (2007). Validation of the
Chinese translated activities-specific balance confidence scale. Archives of physical medicine and
rehabilitation, 88(4), 496-503.
44
6. Functional Activity/ Mobility
BARTHEL ADL INDEX (BI)
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation)
Bowels
0 = incontinent (or needs to be given enemata)
1 = occasional accident (once a week)
2 = continent
Bladder
0 = incontinent, or catheterized and unable to manage alone
1 = occasional accident (maximum once per 24 hours)
2 = continent
Grooming
0 = needs help with personal care
1 = independent face/hair/teeth/shaving (implements provided)
Toilet use
0 = dependent
1 = needs some help, but can do something alone
2 = independent (on and off, dressing, wiping)
Feeding
0 = unable
1 = needs help cutting, spreading butter, etc.
2 = independent
Mobility
0 = immobile
1 = wheelchair independent, including corners
2 = walks with help of one person (verbal or physical)
3 = independent (but may use any aid; for example, stick)
Dressing
0 = dependent
1 = needs help but can do about half unaided
2 = independent (including buttons, zips, laces, etc.)
Stairs
0 = unable
1 = needs help (verbal, physical, carrying aid)
2 = independent
Bathing
0 = dependent
1 = independent (or in shower)
Total 0-20
Reference: Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index: a
simple index of independence useful in scoring improvement in the rehabilitation of the chronically
ill. Maryland state medical journal. 45
MODIFIED BARTHEL ADL INDEX (mBI)
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation)
48
DESCRIPTION OF THE LEVELS OF FUNCTION AND THEIR SCORES
INDEPENDENT Another person is not required for the activity (NO HELPER).
Modified Dependence – The subject expends half (50%) or more of the effort. The levels
of assistance required are:
2 Maximal Assistance – Subject expends less than 50% of the effort, but
Maximal at least 25%.
Assistance
(Subject=25%+)
1 Total Assistance – Subject expends less than 25% of the effort.
Total Assistance
(Subject=0%+)
Reference: Dodds, T. A., Martin, D. P., Stolov, W. C., & Deyo, R. A. (1993). A validation of the
functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation
inpatients. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 74(5), 531-536.
49
50
51
ELDERLY MOBILITY SCALE (EMS)
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation)
Date
Item
Lying to sitting
Sitting to lying
Sitting to standing
Standing
Gait
Timed walk (xTVG)
f Functional reach
Total score
6-meter walk
Key to score:
Sitting to standing
3 Independent in under 3 seconds (whether or not the upper limbs are used)
2 Independent in over 3 seconds
1 Needs help of 1 person (verbal or physical help, uses assisting device, pulls up using upper limb)
0 Needs help of 1 person
Standing Gait
3 Stand without support and able to reach 3 Independent (include using sticks/quadripod)
2 Stand without support but needs to reach 2 Independent with frame
1 Stand but need support 1 Mobil with walking aid but erratic/unsafe
0 Stand only with physical support 0 Needs physical help to walk or supervision
Reference: Smith, R. (1994). Validation and reliability of the Elderly Mobility Scale. Physiotherapy,
52
80(11), 744-747.
MODIFIED RIVERMEAD MOBILITY INDEX (MRMI)
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation)
Not in EMS
Item Score
1. Turning over
______
Please turn over from your back to your ______ side
5. Standing ______
Please remain standing
(The assessor times the patient for 10 seconds)
6. Transfers ______
Please go from your bed to the chair and back again
(The assessor places the chair on the patient’s unaffected side)
8. Stairs ______
Please climb up and down this flight of stairs in your usual way
OVERALL SCORE
Comments: _____________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
53
Scoring Instructions
Reference: Lennon, S., & Johnson, L. (2000). The modified rivermead mobility index: validity and
reliability. Disability and rehabilitation, 22(18), 833-839. 54
7. Gait and Mobility
MODIFIED FUNCTIONAL AMBULATION CLASSIFICATION (MFAC)
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation)
Reference:
Coordinating Committee in Physiotherapy Hospital Authority (2007). Validation study of Modified
Rivermead Mobility Index and Modified Functional Ambulation Classification for stroke patients
[Unpublished data], Hospital Authority.
Holden, M. K., Gill, K. M., & Magliozzi, M. R. (1986). Gait assessment for neurologically impaired
patients: standards for outcome assessment. Physical therapy, 66(10), 1530-1539.
55
10-METER WALK TEST
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation)
• Allow for 2-meter acceleration and deceleration phase (i.e., total 14 m walkway)
0m 2m 12m 14m
Cut-off Scores:
Reference: Bohannon, R. W. (1997). Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged
20—79 years: reference values and determinants. Age and ageing, 26(1), 15-19.
56
DYNAMIC GAIT INDEX (DGI)
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation)
Description:
Developed to assess the likelihood of falling in older adults. Designed to test eight facets of gait.
Equipment needed: Stopwatch, Box (Shoebox), Cones (2), Stairs, 20-ft walkway with 15-in wide
Completion:
Time: 15 minutes
Scoring: A four-point ordinal scale, ranging from 0-3. “0” indicates the lowest level of
function and “3” the highest level of function.
Total Score = 24
Interpretation: < 19/24 = predictive of falls in the elderly
> 22/24 = safe ambulators
57
4. Gait with vertical head turns _____
Instructions: Begin walking at your normal pace. When I tell you to “look up,” keep walking straight, but tip
your head up. Keep looking up until I tell you, “look down,” then keep walking straight and tip your head down.
Keep your head down until I tell you “look straight,“ then keep walking straight, but return your head to the
center.
Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies.
(3) Normal: Performs head turns smoothly with no change in gait.
(2) Mild Impairment: Performs head turns smoothly with slight change in gait velocity, i.e., minor
disruption to smooth gait path or uses walking aid.
(1) Moderate Impairment: Performs head turns with moderate change in gait velocity, slows down,
staggers but recovers, can continue to walk.
(0) Severe Impairment: Performs task with severe disruption of gait, i.e., staggers
outside 15” path, loses balance, stops, reaches for wall.
8. Steps _____
Instructions: Walk up these stairs as you would at home, i.e., using the railing if necessary. At the top, turn
around and walk down.
Grading: Mark the lowest category that applies.
(3) Normal: Alternating feet, no rail.
(2) Mild Impairment: Alternating feet, must use rail.
(1) Moderate Impairment: Two feet to a stair, must use rail.
(0) Severe Impairment: Cannot do safely.
TOTAL SCORE: ___ / 24
Reference: Shumway-Cook, A., Baldwin, M., Polissar, N. L., & Gruber, W. (1997). Predicting the
probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults. Physical therapy, 77(8), 812-819.
58
FUNCTIONAL GAIT ASSESSMENT (FGA)
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation)
Description:
This test is modified from DGI to improve reliability and reduce the ceiling effect. It is used to assess postural
stability during gait tasks.
Equipment needed: Stopwatch, 4.5” Box (Shoebox) x2 , Stairs, 20’(6-m) walkway with 12”(20.48-cm) wide
Interpretation: < 22/30 = predictive of falls in the elderly (Wrisley & Kumar, 2010)
59
Reference: Wrisley, D. M., Marchetti, G. F., Kuharsky, D. K., & Whitney, S. L. (2004). Reliability,
internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment. Physical
therapy, 84(10), 906-918.
Wrisley, D. M., & Kumar, N. A. (2010). Functional gait assessment: concurrent, discriminative, and
predictive validity in community-dwelling older adults. Physical therapy, 90(5), 761-773. 60
8. Upper Limb Function and Coordination
JEBSEN TAYLOR HAND FUNCTION TEST
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation)
The Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT) is a standardized measure of functional hand
motor skills. It consists of 7 items that measure fine motor skills, weighted functional tasks
and non-weighted functional tasks. The 7 items are:
Each item is scored based on the time taken to complete the task. The scores for all 7 items
are summed for a total score. Shorter times indicate better performance. The dominant hand
is tested. Reading glasses are allowed.
Since the writing subset of the test can be affected by hand dominance, modified JTHFT can
be administered. Modified JTHFT has the same sub-tests as JTHFT without writing. It has
been reported to have strong enough correlation with activities of daily living (Davis &
Chung, 2010)
Reference: Jebsen, R. H., Taylor, N., Trieschmann, R. B., Trotter, M. J., & Howard, L. A. (1969).
An objective and standardized test of hand function. Archives of physical medicine and
rehabilitation, 50(6), 311–319.
Davis Sears E., & Chung K. C. (2010) Validity and responsiveness of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand
Function Test. The journal of hand surgery, 35(1), 30–37 61
standardized outcome measure tools are needed
>
-
ACTION RESEARCH ARM TEST
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation)
This test on the functional ability of the upper extremity has 19 tasks assigned to 4 subtests.
The method of scoring is described below:
The first task in each subtest is the most difficult, the second task is the least demanding, the
remaining tasks are in ascending order of difficulty. With the subject in sitting position, start
with task 1 of each subtest. If the subject attains full score in task 1 (the most difficult task),
the whole subtest will be given full score. On the other hand, if the subject scores 0 in task 1,
and again scores 0 in task 2 (easiest task), the whole subtest will score 0. Otherwise, continue
to test all the remaining tasks of the subtest to generate a subtest score.
The Purdue Pegboard Test measures gross movements of the fingers, hands, and arms, as
well as fine fingertip dexterity necessary in assembly tasks.
Access the complete manual of Purdue Pegboard Test for test procedures, equipment and
scoring interpretation and references at:
http://www.limef.com/downloads/MAN-32020A-forpdf-rev0.pdf
The Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test is used to evaluate a subject’s simple but rapid eye-
hand coordination and arm-hand dexterity by assessing their abilities to move small objects
of various distances. It is a test of gross motor skills.
Access the complete manual of Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test for test procedures,
equipment and scoring interpretation and references at:
https://www.rehabmart.com/pdfs/141_2_n.pdf
63
Model 32025 User’s Manual
Model 32025
Table of Contents:
System Description 3
Instructions to the Test 3
Supplementary Instructions (Adult, Adolescent): 4
Supplementary Instructions (Kiddie): 4
Scoring: 4
Interpretation: 5
Norms:
Norms by Age and Sex Kiddie-Adolescent 6
Age Curve Reference Points (Trites) Scores 7
Reference Data (Misc.) Scores 8
References: 9
Ordering Information: 10
2 3700 Sagamore Parkway North . PO Box 5729 . Lafayette, IN 47903 USA . Ph: 765-423-1505
Model 32025 User’s Manual 3
Description:
The following administrative instructions and age curve data are taken from the
Neuropsychological Test Manual developed by Dr. Ronald Trites, Royal Ottawa Hospital,
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Three batteries of tests have been defined for the normative data obtained by Trites.
The Grooved Pegboard is a manipulative dexterity test. This unit consists of 25 holes with
randomly positioned slots. Pegs, which have a key along one side, must be rotated to match the
hole before the can be inserted. This test requires more complex visual-motor coordination than
most pegboards.
“This is a pegboard and these are the pegs. (Examiner points out each and then picks up
one of the pegs and continues.)
All the pegs are the same. They have a groove, that is, a round side and a square side
and so do the holes in the boards. What you must do is match the groove of the peg with
the groove of the board and put these pegs into the holes like this. (The examiner dem-
onstrates by filling the top row. Remove the pegs, putting them back into the tray.)
When I say go, begin here and put the pegs into the boards as fast as you can, using only
your (dominant) hand. Fill the top row completely from this side to this side. Do not
skip any; fill each row the same way you filled the top row. Any questions? Ready, as
fast as you can, go.”
The examiner encourages the subject to perform the task as quickly as possible, telling him or her to speed
up if necessary. The pegs must be put in the board in the exact order and in the correct direction.
Frequently, it will be necessary to point out the first hole of a new row, particularly during the non-
dominant hand trial. Only one peg is to be picked up at a time and the subject should immediately be told if
ore than one is picked up.
Also, only one hand is to be used. Occasionally, a subject will attempt to use his or her other hand to help
turn the peg around. It may be necessary to tell the subject to keep the hand on his or her lap, or for the
examiner to hold it. If necessary, the board should be held steady for the patient. In the case of severe
motor impairment, the subject should attempt the task just to see if any of the pegs can be put in. Any factor
that may effect the subject’s performance should be noted, e.g. sore finger, bandage, etc.
If a peg is dropped to the floor, the examiner should not make an attempt to pick it up during the trial;
rather, one of the pegs correctly placed should be taken out and used again. (Usually, the first or second
peg.)
Scoring:
⑮
Record, in seconds, the length of time required to perform each trial beginning when the subject starts the
task until the last peg is put in, or the test is discontinued. A trial may be discontinued after five minutes. In
such cases, the difficulty is described and the scores are given “A” flags indicating an incomplete test.
⑪d
The second score is the number of “drops” made during each trial. A “drop” is any unintentional drop of a
peg from the time the subject attempts to pick up the peg from the try until it is placed correctly in the hole.
If more than one peg is picked up from the tray and the subject intentionally discards all but one of the pegs,
it is not considered a drop. If a peg is intentionally laid down on the side of the tray or table, in order to
purposefully manipulate the peg, it is not considered a drop. If one peg is turned with the hand not being
4 3700 Sagamore Parkway North . PO Box 5729 . Lafayette, IN 47903 USA . Ph: 765-423-1505
Model 32025 User’s Manual 5
Scoring (continued):
tested, this is noted. If, however, this occurs more than once, the score is given a “D” flag for a
nonstandard assessment.
③
The third score is the number of pegs correctly placed in the holes for each trial. The task is performed
once with the dominant and then once with the non-dominant hand. For each hand, the three scores are
summed (the total time, total number of drops and the total number of pegs correctly placed in the board)
to get complete score.
Interpretation:
When a test such as the Grooved Pegboard test is to be used for personnel selection, the ideal procedure
is to establish its validity locally, by testing all newly hired employees and correlating scores with their
subsequent performance (supervisor ratings or time they remain employed). This approach to validation
requires that test scores should not be used to select employees until evidence has accumulated of its
validity, and that test scores be inaccessible to supervisors or others who affect the worker’s ratings or
job longevity. An alternative validation procedure is to administer the test to all present employees and
correlate scores with ratings or with subsequent performance (Anastasi, 1982, pp. 65-101). The
Grooved Pegboard test should correlate most highly with those jobs, which require speed, finger
dexterity, and manual dexterity. It should be of relevance to performance on assembly and machine
operating jobs. We at Lafayette Instrument Company are always interested in validation data, which you
may collect in various industrial settings or academic studies.
Of course, scores on such a test are of diagnostic utility in Neuropsychological practice only within the
context of an extensive sampling of medical, cognitive, motor, sensory and personality factors. Keeping
this provision in mind, it should be noted that Matthews, Cleeland & Hopper (1970) found that patients
with multiple sclerosis (MS) were significantly slower than “control” patients with other central nervous
system impairments. MS patients (N = 30) had a mean of 323.40 seconds (S.D. = 176.98) while
controls (N = 30) had a mean of 171.77 seconds (S.D. = 48.20). The difference was significant (t =
5.13, p. = .01, r = .690). Out of 24 tests in the study, those “of considerable utility in inter-group
discrimination p. 6) were Grooved Pegboard Test, the Static Steadiness Test (equivalent to Lafayette
#32011), the Maze Coordination Test (similar to Lafayette #20015) and measure of Finger Tapping
speed.
Age M SD M SD M SD M SD
5 70 33.9 75 38.1 66 32.3 73 36.8
6 58 26.1 64 33.9 63 31.2 65 30.1
7 48 24.6 51 22.0 53 24.8 58 19.9
8 38 9.02 41 14.6 38 10.4 47 26.8
9 84 19.5 92 23.8 90 54.0 96 50.6
10 83 36.5 90 28.9 84 18.1 92 24.4
11 76 18.1 86 31.0 79 17.0 92 24.8
12 78 24.4 85 32.2 80 19.5 87 21.6
13 78 40.5 81 23.8 81 52.6 84 42.4
14 79 25.2 86 44.5 77 54.3 78 17.6
6 3700 Sagamore Parkway North . PO Box 5729 . Lafayette, IN 47903 USA . Ph: 765-423-1505
Model 32025 User’s Manual 7
Grooved Pegboard
Age Curve Reference Points (Trites)
Male Female
Dominant Non-Dominant Dominant Non-Dominant
The above scores were obtained by adding: time (in seconds) required to fill pegboard, number of “drops” and number of pegs placed in the board.
Above scores derived without adding number of pegs dropped and number of pegs correctly placed in board to the subject’s time.
8 3700 Sagamore Parkway North . PO Box 5729 . Lafayette, IN 47903 USA . Ph: 765-423-1505
Model 32025 User’s Manual 9
References:
Anastasi, Anne. Psychological Testing. (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan, 1982.
Haaland, K. York, Cleelan, Charles S., & Carr, Daniel. Motor performance after unilateral
hemisphere damage in patients with tumor. Archives of Neurology, 1977, 34, pp. 556-559.
Heaton, R.K., Grant, I., & Matthews, C.G., “Differences in neuropsychological test performance
associated with age, education, and sex,” Neuropsychological Assessment of
Neuropsychiatric Disorders. New York: Oxford, 1986.
Klouoff, H. & Low, M. “Disordered brain function in young children and early adolescents:
Neuropsychological and EEG correlates,” Clinical Neuropsychology. New York: Wiley,
1974.
Knights, R.M. & Moule, P.D., “Normative data on the motor steadiness battery for chidren,”
Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26, 1968, 643-650.
Matthews, Charles, Cleeland, Charles S., & Hopper, Cornelius L. Neurological patterns in multiple
sclerosis. Diseases of the Nervous System, 1970, 31, pp. 161-170.
Matthews, C.G. & Healand K., “The effect of symptom duration on cognitive and motor
performance in Parkinsonism,” Neurology, 29, 1979, 951-956.
Trites, Ronald L. Neuropsychological Test Manual. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Royal Ottawa
Hospital, 1977.
Ordering Information:
All phone orders must be accompanied by a hard copy of value, and returned along with a cover letter explaining the
your order. All must include the following information: malfunction. Please also state the name of the Lafayette
1) Complete billing and shipping addresses Instrument representative authorizing the return. An estimate
2) Name and department of end user of repair will be given prior to completion ONLY if requested
3) Model number and description of desired item(s) in your enclosed cover letter. We must have a hard copy of
4) Quantity of each item desired your purchase order by mail or fax, or repair work cannot
5) Purchase order number or method of payment commence.
6) Telephone number
WARRANTY
DOMESTIC TERMS Lafayette Instrument guarantees its equipment against all defects
There is a $50 minimum order. Open accounts can be extended in materials and workmanship to the ORIGINAL PURCHASER
to most recognized educational institutions, hospitals and for a period of one (1) year from the date of shipment, unless
government agencies. Net amount due 30 days from the date otherwise stated. During this period, Lafayette Instrument will
of shipment. Enclose payment with the order; charge with repair or replace, at its option, any equipment found to be
VISA, MasterCard, American Express; or pay COD. We must defective in materials or workmanship. If a problem arises,
have a hard copy of your order by mail or fax. Students, please contact our office for prior authorization before returning
individuals and private companies may call for a credit the item. This warranty does not extend to damaged equipment
application. resulting from alteration, misuse, negligence or abuse, normal
wear or accident. In no event shall Lafayette Instrument be
INTERNATIONAL PAYMENT INFORMATION liable for incidental or consequential damages. There are no
There is a $50 minimum order. Payment must be made in implied warranties or merchantability of fitness for a particular
advance by: draft drawn on a major US bank; wire transfer to use, or of any other nature. Warranty period for repairs or
our account; charge with VISA, MasterCard, American used equipment purchased from Lafayette Instrument is 90 days.
Express; or confirmed irrevocable letter of credit. Proforma
invoices will be provided upon request. DAMAGED GOODS
Damaged equipment should not be returned to Lafayette
RETURNS Instrument prior to thorough inspection.
Equipment may not be returned without first receiving a Return
Goods Authorization Number (RGA). When a shipment arrives damaged, note damage on delivery
bill and have the driver sign it to acknowledge the damage.
When returning equipment for service, please call Lafayette Contact the delivery service, and they will file an insurance
Instrument to receive a RGA number. Your RGA number will claim. When damage is not detected at the time of delivery,
be good for 30 days. Address the shipment to: Lafayette contact the carrier and request an inspection within 10 days of
Instrument Company, 3700 Sagamore Parkway North, the original delivery. Please call the Lafayette Instrument
Lafayette, IN 47904, U.S.A. Shipments cannot be received at Customer Service Department for a return authorization for
the PO Box. The items should be packed well, insured for full repair or replacement of the damaged merchandise.
Reference: Hoehn, M. M., & Yahr, M. D. (1967). Parkinsonism: onset, progression and
mortality. Neurology, 17(5), 427–442.
64
AMERICAN SPINAL INJURY ASSOCIATION (ASIA)
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR NEUROLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF
SPINAL CORD INJURY (ISNCSCI)
(ICF Domain: Body Structure/Function - Impairment)
65
Reference: https://asia-spinalinjury.org/international-standards-neurological-
classification-sci-isncsci-worksheet/
66
SPINAL CORD INDEPENDENCE MEASURE III (SCIM III)
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation)
SCIM is a disability scale developed specifically for the SCI population to access various
activities of daily living. It is sensitive enough to detect important functional changes in
individuals with SCI over time.
Self Care
1. Feeding (cutting, opening containers, pouring, bringing food to mouth, holding cup
with fluid)
0. Needs parenteral, gastrostomy or fully assisted oral feeding
1. Needs partial assistance for eating and/or drinking, or for wearing adaptive devices
2. Eats independently; needs adaptive devices or assistance only for cutting food and/or pouring
and/or opening containers
3. Eats and drinks independently; does not require assistance or adaptive devices
2. Bathing (soaping, washing, drying body and head, manipulating water tap)
A. Upper Body
0. Requires total assistance
1. Requires partial assistance
2. Washes independently with adaptive devices or in a specific setting (e.g. bars, chair)
3. Washes independently; does not require adaptive devices or specific setting (not customary for
healthy people) (adss)
B. Lower Body
0. Requires total assistance
1. Requires partial assistance
2. Washes independently with adaptive devices or in a specific setting (adss)
3. Washes independently; does not require adaptive devices (adss) or specific setting
3. Dressing
A. Upper Body
0. Requires total assistance
1. Requires partial assistance with clothes without buttons, zippers or laces (cwobzl)
2. Independent with cwobzl; requires adaptive devices and/or specific settings (adss)
3. Independent with cwobzl; does not require adss; needs assistance or adss only for bzl
4. Dresses (any clothes) interpedently; does not require adaptive devices or specific setting
B. Lower Body
0. Requires total assistance
1. Requires partial assistance with clothes without buttons, zippers or laces (cwobzl)
2. Independent with cwobzl; requires adaptive devices and/or specific settings (adss)
3. Independent with cwobzl without adss; needs assistance or adss only for bzl
4. Dresses (any clothes) interpedently; does not require adaptive devices or specific setting
4. Grooming (washing hands and face, brushing teeth, combing ahir, shaving,
applying makeup)
0. Requires total assistance
1. Requires partial assistance
2. Grooms interpedently with adaptive devices
3. Grooms independently without adaptive devices
Self Care Subtotal (0-20)
67
Respiration and Sphincter Management
5. Respiration
0. Requires tracheal tube (TT) and permanent or intermittent assisted ventilation (IAV)
2. Breathes interpedently with TT; requires oxygen, much assistance in coughing or TT
management
4. Breathes independently with TT; requires little assistance in coughing or TT management
6. Breathes independently without TT; requires oxygen, much assistance in coughing, a mask (e.g.
peep) or IAV (bipap)
8. Breathes independently without TT; requires little assistance or stimulation for coughing
10. breathes indepdently without assistance or device
6. Sphincter Management – Bladder
0. Indwelling catheter
3. Residual urine volume (RUV) > 100cc; no regular catheterization or assisted intermittent
catheterization
6. RUV <100cc or intermittent self-catheterization; needs assistance for applying drainage
instrument
9. Intermittent self-catheterization; uses external drainage instrument; does not need assistance for
applying
11. Intermittent self-catheterization; continent between catheterizations; does not use external
drainage instrument
13. RUV <100cc; needs only external urine drainage; no assistance is required for drainage
15. RUV <100cc; continent; does not use external drainage instrument
7. Sphincter Management – Bowel
0. Irregular timing or very low frequency (less than once in 3 days) of bowel movements
5. Regular timing, but requires assistance (e.g. for applying suppository); rare accidents (less than
twice a month)
8. Regular bowel movements, without assistance; rare accidents (less than twice a month)
10. Regular bowel movements, without assistance; no accidents
8. Use of Toilet (perineal hygiene, adjustment of clothes before/after, use of napkins
or diapers)
0. Requires total assistance
1. Requires partial assistance; does not clean self
2. Requires partial assistance; cleans self independently
4. Uses toilet independently in all tasks but needs adaptive device or special setting (e.g. bars)
5. Uses toilet independently; does not require adaptive devices or special setting
Respiration and Sphincter Management Subtotal (0-40)
Mobility (room and toilet)
9. Mobility in Bed and Action to Prevent Pressure Sores
0. Needs assistance in all activities: turning upper body in bed, turning lower body in bed, sitting
up in bed, doing push-ups in wheelchair, with or without adaptive devices, but not with electric
aids
2. Performs one of the activities without assistance
4. Performs two or three of the activities without assistance
6. Performs all the bed mobility and pressure release activities independently
10. Transfers: bed-wheelchair (locking wheelchair, lifting footrests, removing and
adjusting arm rests, transferring, lifting feet)
0. Requires total assistance
1. Needs partial assistance and/or supervision, and/or adaptive devices (e.g. sliding board)
2. Independent (or does not require wheelchair)
11. Transfers: wheelchair-toilet-tub (if uses toilet wheelchair: transfers to and from;
if uses regular wheelchair: locking wheelchair, lifting footrests, removing and
adjusting armrests, transferring, lifting feet)
0. Requires total assistance
1. Needs partial assistance and/or supervision, and/or adaptive devices (e.g. grab-bars)
2. Independent (or does not require wheelchair)
68
Mobility (indoors and outdoors, on even surface)
12. Mobility Indoors
0. Requires total assistance
1. Needs electric wheelchair or partial assistance to operate manual wheelchair
2. Moves independently in manual wheelchair
3. Requires supervision while walking (with or without devices)
4. Walks with a walking frame or crutches (swing)
5. Walks with crutches or two canes (reciprocal walking)
6. Walks with one cane
7. Needs leg orthosis only
8. Walks without walking aids
13. Mobility for Moderate Distances (10-100 meters)
0. Requires total assistance
1. Needs electric wheelchair or partial assistance to operate manual wheelchair
2. Moves independently in manual wheelchair
3. Requires supervision while walking (with or without devices)
4. Walks with a walking frame or crutches (swing)
5. Walks with crutches or two canes (reciprocal walking)
6. Walks with one cane
7. Needs leg orthosis only
8. Walks without walking aids
14. Mobility Outdoors (more than 100 meters)
0. Requires total assistance
1. Needs electric wheelchair or partial assistance to operate manual wheelchair
2. Move independently in manual wheelchair
3. Requires supervision while walking (with or without evices)
4. Walks with a walking frame or crutches (swing)
5. Walks with crutches or two canes (reciprocal walking
6. Walks with one cane
7. Needs leg orthosis only
8. Walks without walking aids
15. Stair Management
0. Unable to ascend or descend stairs
1. Ascends and descends at least 3 steps with support or supervision of another person
2. Ascends and descends at least 3 steps with support of handrail and/or crutch or cane
3. Ascends and descends at least 3 steps without any support or supervision
16. Transfers: wheelchair-car (approaching car, locking wheelchair, removing arm
and footrests, transferring to and from car, bringing wheelchair inot and out of car)
0. Requires total assistance
1. Needs partial assistance and/or supervision and/or adaptive devices
2. Transfers independent; does not require adaptive devices (or does not require wheelchair)
17. Transfers: ground-wheelchair
0. Requires assistance
1. Transfers independent with or without adaptive devices (or does not require wheelchair)
Mobility Subtotal (0-40)
Total SCIM Score (0-100)
Reference: Catz, A., Itzkovich, M., Steinberg, F., Philo, O., Ring, H., Ronen, J., Spasser, R.,
Gepstein, R., & Tamir, A. (2001). The Catz-Itzkovich SCIM: a revised version of the Spinal Cord
Independence Measure. Disability and rehabilitation, 23(6), 263–268.
69
SUNNYBROOK FACIAL GRADING SYSTEM
(ICF Domain: Body Structure/Function - Impairment)
Reference: Ross, B. G., Fradet, G., & Nedzelski, J. M. (1996). Development of a sensitive clinical
facial grading system. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 114(3), 380-386. 70
MOTION SENSITIVITY QUOTATION
(ICF Domain: Body Structure/Function - Impairment)
Reference: Akin, F. W., & Davenport, M. J. (2003). Validity and reliability of the Motion Sensitivity
Test. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 40(5), 415.
Shepard, N. T., Smith-Wheelock, M., Telian, S. A., & Raj, A. (1993). Vestibular and balance
rehabilitation therapy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 102(3), 198–205.
71
DIZZINESS HANDICAP INVENTORY (DHI; Eng Ver.)
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation & Participation – Participation Restriction)
Reference: Jacobson, G. P., & Newman, C. W. (1990). The development of the dizziness
handicap inventory. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 116(4), 424-427.
72
DIZZINESS HANDICAP INVENTORY (DHI; Chi Ver.)
(ICF Domain: Activity – Functional Limitation & Participation – Participation Restriction)
Reference: Poon, D. M. Y., Chow, L. C. K., Hui, Y., Au, D. K. K., & Leung, M. C. P. (2004).
Translation of the dizziness handicap inventory into Chinese, validation of it, and evaluation of the
quality of life of patients with chronic dizziness. Annals of Otology, Rhinology &
Laryngology, 113(12), 1006-1011.
73
10. Quality of Life
SHORT FORM-36 (SF-36)
(ICF domain: Participation – Participation Restriction)
Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a generic patient-report measure for the assessment of health-
related quality of life. There are 36 items in the measure and they are divided into 8
subscales:
Physical functioning
Role limitation due to physical problems
Role limitations due to emotional problems
Vitality (Energy/fatigue)
Emotional well-being
Social functioning
Bodily pain
General health
Health change
Scores are transformed onto a scale from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health).
Each subscales score contributes to the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental
Component Summary (MCS) scores.
For the survey and the scoring instruction of SF-36, please visit: https://www.rand.org/health-
care/surveys_tools/mos/36-item-short-form.html
For the online version, please visit: https://orthotoolkit.com/sf-36/
For the Hong Kong version, please visit:
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/suppl/2015/03/17/bmjopen-2014-006521.DC1/bmjopen-
2014-006521supp_appendix.pdf
Reference: Ware Jr, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey
(SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical care, 473-483. 74
SHORT FORM-12 (SF-12)
(ICF domain: Participation – Participation Restriction)
Short Form-12 (SF-12) is a generic patient-report measure for the assessment of health-
related quality of life. SF-12 is a shortened version of SF-36. It was designed to reduce the
burden of response. There are 12 items in the measure and they are divided into 8 subscales
as same as SF-36. Each subscales score contributes to the Physical Component Summary
(PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores.
SF-12 is not available for free by its authors, due to a scoring programme.
Reference: Ware Jr, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-Item Short-Form Health
Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical care, 220-
233. 75
WHO QUALITY OF LIFE-BREF
(ICF domain: Participation – Participation Restriction)
76
77
Reference: Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O'Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health
Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of
the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of life Research, 13, 299- 78
310.