Professional Documents
Culture Documents
02-07-2023 TO 08-07-2023
INDEX
• World Competitiveness Index
• Google versus NCLAT in SC
• National Sickle Cell Anaemia Mission
• Khasi Autonomous District Council
• Meira Paibis
• Nuclear Armaments in the World
• Report on Children & Conflict: Indian Perspective
• Global Environment Facility
• National Research Foundation
• PM PRANAM
• Greedflation
• TN Governor dismisses Minister
• Open Market Sale Scheme
• 23rd SCO Summit
WORLD COMPETITIVENESS INDEX
Recently, the International Institute for Management Development (IMD) published the World
Competitiveness Index.
ABOUT THE INDEX:
• The IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook (WCY), was first published in 1989.
• It is a comprehensive annual report and worldwide reference point on the
competitiveness of countries.
• It analyses and ranks countries according to how they manage their competencies to
achieve long-term value creation.
• It is based on 336 competitiveness criteria and four factors, namely Economic
performance, Government efficiency, Business efficiency, and Infrastructure.
KEY FINDINGS
• Denmark, Ireland, and Switzerland have been named the top three among 64 economies
measured for their global competitiveness.
• India fell three rungs to finish 40th but is still in a better position than it was between
2019-2021 when it was placed 43rd three years in a row.
• India improved in government efficiency but fared slightly poorer than other countries in
business efficiency, infrastructure, and economic performance.
• Specifically, the top three measures that helped India in its score are exchange rate
stability, compensation levels, and improvements in pollution control.
GOOGLE V/S NCLAT IN SC
• Google has filed an appeal in the Supreme Court against a verdict by the National
Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).
• In March 2023, NCLAT had partially upheld Competition Commission of India’s (CCI)
Android dominance order against Google.
o CCI is a statutory body established in March 2009 under the Competition Act, 2002
with an aim to eliminate practices having adverse effect on competition.
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA FINES GOOGLE (OCTOBER 2022)
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has imposed a penalty of Rs 1,337.76 crore on
Google for abusing its dominant position in the Android mobile device ecosystem.
WHY CCI HAS FINED GOOGLE?
CCI said that Google used its dominant position to make it mandatory that OEMs pre-install its
entire Google Mobile Suite on their phones and place them prominently.
The Mobile Suite includes Search, Chrome, YouTube, Google Play store, Maps, and Photos
among others.
The CCI found that this mandate amounts to imposition of unfair conditions on the device
manufacturers and thus was in contravention of the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002.
ABOUT COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) is a statutory body established fully in March 2009
under the Competition Act, 2002.
The Commission consists of one Chairperson and six members who shall be appointed by the
Central Government.
The commission is a quasi-judicial body who also gives opinions to statutory authorities.
It is also mandated to undertake competition advocacy, create public awareness and impart
training on competition issues.
POWERS OF CCI
• It has the power to inquire into a certain kinds of agreement as well as the dominant
position of enterprises.
• It has the power to inquire into any acquisition or combination if it determines that such
acquisition or combination may adversely affect competition in the Indian market.
• It has the power to regulate its own procedures. It also determines whether an agreement
has AAEC (Appreciable Adverse Effects on Competition).
• It has the power to impose monetary penalties upon violation of the Competition Act,
2002.
• It has the power to pass an interim order for any act where there has been anti-
competition agreements or abuse of position by dominant parties which adversely affects
the competition in the market.
WHAT CCI WANTS GOOGLE TO DO NOW?
• Apart from imposing monetary penalty, the commission has issued cease and desist
orders against Google from indulging in the found anti-competitive practices.
• It also says that OEMs should not be mandated to choose Google’s proprietary
applications and services to be pre-installed
• It is also told to not restrict uninstalling of its pre-installed apps by the users.
• The Commission also said that Google will have to allow users to choose their default
search engine during the initial device setup.
WHY HAS GOOGLE APPEALED THE NCLAT ORDER?
• Google acknowledged that the NCLAT made a correct decision by stating that harm
resulting from anti-competitive behaviour must be proven.
• However, Google also pointed out that the NCLAT failed to apply this requirement to
some of the directions given by the CCI that were upheld.
• Hence, Google decided to present its case before the Supreme Court demonstrating how
Android has benefitted Indian users, developers, and OEMs, and powered India’s digital
transformation.
THE NCLAT ORDER
• No confirmation bias in CCI’s order
o NCLAT held that the CCI's order does not suffer from any confirmation bias.
o Hence, it upheld the penalty of ₹1,337 crore imposed on Google by the CCI for its
anti-competitive conduct in the Android ecosystem.
• Anti-competitive practices by google
o Furthermore, NCLAT has held that Google asking the OEMs to pre-install the entire
Google Suite of 11 applications amounts to imposition of unfair conditions.
• Directions by NCLAT that were in Google's favour
o Google was fair in sending warnings (Side loading) to users when they download
applications directly from the website or from an unknown source.
o Google need not share its proprietary Application Program Interface (API) with
third parties.
o Google was right in not permitting third party application stores on its play stores
to avoid malware.
o Google can restrict uninstallation of Google suite apps on Android phones.
NATIONAL SICKLE CELL ANAEMIA MISSION
Prime Minister will launch the National Sickle Cell Anaemia Elimination Mission at a public
programme in Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh.
THE BACKGROUND
• Manipur was boiling since February 2023
o Manipur has been restive since February when the state government launched an
eviction drive seen as targeting a specific tribal group.
o The drive led to protests but not on the scale of the one seen recently.
• High Court’s order as a trigger point
o The recent protests were triggered by the Manipur High Court’s direction to the
State to pursue a 10-year-old recommendation to grant Scheduled Tribe (ST)
status to the non-tribal Meitei community.
o The Court’s order has brought the historical tensions between the valley-dwelling
Meitei community and the state’s hill tribes to a boil.
• Violence started
o A ‘tribal solidarity march’ was organised by the All Tribal Students’ Union of
Manipur (ATSUM) against the order of the High Court.
o Violent clashes broke out at various places in Manipur during the course of this
march.
MAJOR COMMUNITIES OF MANIPUR
• The State is like a football stadium with the Imphal Valley representing the playfield at
the centre and the surrounding hills the galleries.
• The valley, which comprises about 10% of Manipur’s landmass, is dominated by the non-
tribal Meitei.
o This area yields 40 of the State’s 60 MLAs.
• The hills comprising 90% of the geographical area are inhabited by more than 35%
recognised tribes.
o This area sends only 20 MLAs to the Assembly.
WHY DOES MEITI WANT ST STATUS?
• There has been an organised push in support of this demand since 2012, led by the
Scheduled Tribes Demand Committee of Manipur (STDCM).
• Recognised as tribe before merger with India
o In their plea before the High Court, it was argued that the Meitei community was
recognised as a tribe before the merger of the princely state of Manipur with the
Union of India in 1949. It lost its identity as a tribe after the merger.
• Need to preserve tradition and culture
o The demand for ST status arose from the need to preserve the community, and
save the ancestral land, tradition, culture and language of the Meiteis.
o As per the arguments forwarded by the community in the court:
▪ The community has been victimised without any constitutional safeguards
to date.
▪ The Meitein/Meetei have been gradually marginalised in their ancestral
land.
▪ Their population which was 59% of the total population of Manipur in 1951
has now been reduced to 44% as per 2011 Census data.
WHY ARE OTHER TRIBAL GROUPS AGAINST ST STATUS FOR MEITIS?
• The tribal groups say the Meiteis have a demographic and political advantage besides
being more advanced than them academically and in other aspects.
o The Meiteis are a dominant group controlling the state and its apparatuses.
o Hence, the claim that Meiteis need ST status to protect their culture and identity is
self-defeating.
• They feel the ST status to the Meiteis would lead to loss of job opportunities and allow
them to acquire land in the hills and push the tribals out.
• The Manipuri language of the Meiteis is included in the Eighth Schedule of the
Constitution.
• Sections of the Meitei community — which is predominantly Hindu — are already
classified under Scheduled Castes (SC) or Other Backward Classes (OBC).
ARE THERE ANY OTHER CONFLICT LINES?
• Unrest has been brewing among the hill tribes of the state for a number of reasons.
• Pro-government groups in Manipur claim that some tribal groups with vested interests
are trying to scuttle Chief Minister’s crusade against drugs.
• The anti-drug drive began with destroying poppy fields and the theory that illegal settlers
from Myanmar are behind clearing forests and government lands to grow opium and
cannabis.
o These settlers are ethnically related to the Kuki-Zomi people of Manipur.
• The first violent protest in March was against the eviction of the residents of a Kuki village.
o Kuki groups have claimed that the survey and eviction is a violation of Article 371C,
which confers some administrative autonomy to the tribal-dominated hill areas of
Manipur.
MEIRA PAIBIS
Recently, the Indian Army's Spear Corps accused women activist Meira Paibis in Manipur of
deliberately blocking routes and interfering in the Operations of Security Forces as the state
struggles to contain weeks of rioting and unrest.
SALIENT FEATURES
• It will pave the way to establish NRF that will seed, grow and promote R&D and foster a
culture of research and innovation throughout India’s universities, colleges, research
institutions and R&D laboratories.
• The proposed Bill also repeals the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB)
established by Parliament in 2008 and subsumes it into the NRF.
o The SERB is the Department of Science and Technology’s (DST) main funding body
and is responsible for funding S&T start-ups, setting up incubators and funding
science-related projects in central and state universities
WHAT IS NRF?
• As per the recommendations of the National Education Policy (NEP), NRF will be
established at a total estimated cost of ₹50,000 crore from 2023-28.
o The government will contribute ₹10,000 crore over five years and close to ₹36,000
crore is expected to come from the private sector (as investments into research).
• The DST would be an “administrative” department of NRF that would be governed by a
Governing Board.
o The Prime Minister will be the ex-officio President of the Board and the Union
Minister of Science & Technology and Union Minister of Education will be the ex-
officio Vice-Presidents.
o The Governing Board will also consist of eminent researchers and professionals
across disciplines.
• NRF’s functioning will be governed by an Executive Council chaired by the Principal
Scientific Adviser to the Government of India.
• The NRF will prioritise research funding and the Executive Council will decide on what
areas need support.
• NRF will forge collaborations among the industry, academia, and government
departments and research institutions.
• It will focus on creating a policy framework and putting in place regulatory processes that
can encourage collaboration and increased spending by the industry on R&D.
SIGNIFICANCE
• Democratisation of science funding: NRF will emphasise the funding of projects in
peripheral, rural and semi-urban areas, which are neglected and never receive funding
for science projects.
• Finding solutions to the big problems facing Indian society: The NRF would promote
research not just in the natural sciences and engineering, but also in social sciences, arts
and humanities.
• Provides an efficient and integrated management system: For the implementation of
the missions such as the supercomputer mission or the quantum mission.
PM PRANAM
Recently, the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) approved the PM Programme for
Restoration, Awareness, Generation, Nourishment and Amelioration of Mother Earth (PM-
PRANAM) scheme.
THE PROPOSED SCHEME
• The proposed scheme intends to reduce the subsidy burden on chemical fertilisers,
which is expected to increase to Rs 2.25 lakh crore in 2022-2023, which is 39% higher
than the previous year’s figure of Rs 1.62 lakh crore.
• The scheme will not have a separate budget and will be financed by the “savings of
existing fertiliser subsidy” under schemes run by the Department of fertilisers.
• Further, 50% subsidy savings will be passed on as a grant to the state that saves the
money and that 70% of the grant provided under the scheme can be used for asset
creation related to technological adoption of alternate fertilisers and alternate fertiliser
production units at village, block and district levels.
• The remaining 30% grant money can be used for incentivising farmers, panchayats,
farmer producer organisations and self-help groups that are involved in the reduction of
fertiliser use and awareness generation.
GREEDFLATION
There is a growing consensus across the world that corporate greed is causing inflation and
workers are being doubly penalised by low wage increases and higher interest rates.
It is important to understand the policy implications and whether India is also witnessing
‘Greedflation.’
WHAT IS INFLATION?
• Inflation (or the inflation rate) is the rate at which the general price level rises.
• For example, when it is reported that the inflation rate was 5% in June 2023 it implies
that the general price level of the economy (as measured by a representative basket of
goods and services) was 5% more than what it was in June 2022.
CAUSES & TYPES OF INFLATION:
• Either price gets pushed up because input costs have risen — this is called cost-push
inflation.
o For example, if crude oil prices went up by 10% overnight because of a supply
disruption then the general price level will be pushed up because energy costs have
gone up.
• Prices are pulled up due to excess demand- this is called demand-pull inflation.
o For example, if RBI cuts interest rates sharply and the public finds that buying a
house is now quite affordable, since EMIs have fallen, then the sudden surge in
demand for new houses will pull up home prices because new houses cannot be
made immediately.
WHAT IS GREEDFLATION?
• Greedflation simply means (corporate) greed is fuelling inflation.
• In other words, instead of the wage-price spiral, it is the profit-price spiral that is in play.
• In essence, greedflation implies that companies exploited the inflation that people were
experiencing by putting up their prices way beyond just covering their increased costs
and then used that to maximise their profit margins. That, in turn, further fuelled
inflation.
• In Europe and the US there is a growing consensus that greedflation is the real culprit.
WHAT IS HAPPENING IN US & EUROPE?