Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROTOCOLS (CA- I)
INTRODUCTION
The development of the ICESCR was part of the broader post-World War II
human rights movement, which sought to codify a comprehensive framework for
the protection of human dignity and well-being. The idea of economic, social, and
cultural rights gained momentum alongside civil and political rights, reflecting the
interconnected nature of human rights and the need for a holistic approach to
human dignity.
The ICESCR's origins can be traced back to the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights (UDHR) adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. While
the UDHR included several economic, social, and cultural rights, it was not
legally binding. The subsequent drafting of the ICESCR was driven by the desire
to establish a legally enforceable framework specifically dedicated to these rights.
Negotiations for the covenant began in the early 1960s within the United Nations
Commission on Human Rights. After several years of drafting and deliberation,
the ICESCR was adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1966, alongside the
ICCPR. The covenant entered into force in 1976 after it was ratified by a
sufficient number of member states.
Since its adoption, the ICESCR has played a crucial role in promoting and
protecting economic, social, and cultural rights worldwide. It has been ratified by
a significant number of countries, demonstrating the widespread recognition of
these rights as fundamental to human dignity and development. The ICESCR,
along with its optional protocol, provides avenues for individuals and groups to
seek redress for violations of their economic, social, and cultural rights,
contributing to the ongoing effort to create a more just and equitable world.
Optional Protocol:
The Optional Protocol enhances the implementation and enforcement mechanisms
of the ICESCR by establishing two key procedures:
1. Review of State Reports: Similar to the HRC's function under the ICCPR,
the CESCR reviews periodic reports submitted by states parties on their
implementation of the ICESCR. States are required to submit initial reports
shortly after ratification and subsequent periodic reports detailing the
measures taken to fulfill their obligations under the covenant. The CESCR
examines these reports, engages in dialogue with states parties, and
provides recommendations and observations to address any shortcomings in
the implementation of economic, social, and cultural rights.
All States parties are obliged to submit regular reports to the Committee on how
the rights are being implemented.
States must report initially one year after acceding to the Covenant and then
whenever the Committee requests (usually every four years).
The Committee examines each report and addresses its concerns and
recommendations to the State party in the form of "concluding
observations.”
PURPOSE:
The Covenant follows the structure of the UDHR and ICCPR, with a preamble
and THIRTY ONE articles, divided into FIVE parts
• Part 1 (Article 1)
• Part 2 (Article 2-5)
• Part 3 (Article 6-15)
• Part 4 (Article 16-25)
• Part 5 (Article 26-31)
Article 2 - Non-Discrimination:
Example: Enforcement of labor laws that mandate fair wages, safe working
conditions, and reasonable working hours to protect workers' health,
safety, and well-being.
Articles 16-25:
Article 25 - Amendments:
Article 28 - Denunciation:
These examples illustrate how the articles of the ICESCR translate into real-
world policies, programs, and actions aimed at promoting and protecting
economic, social, and cultural rights for all individuals and communities.
3. Legislative Framework:
4. Progressive Realization:
In summary, while the ICESCR and the Constitution of India are distinct legal
instruments, they share common goals in promoting and protecting economic,
social, and cultural rights. Both documents serve as important frameworks for
ensuring the well-being and dignity of individuals and communities, with the
Constitution of India providing a domestic legal framework and the ICESCR
offering international standards and guidelines for states parties, including India,
to follow.
CONCLUSION