Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Replacements of components
o Recognition criteria will determine whether the amount should
be capitalized or expensed
o If capitalized, the carrying amount of the part being replaced is
derecognized
o If not practical to determine the carrying amount of the part,
the cost of the replaced part may be used to estimate CA.
Example: 4
Alpha Ltd acquires an aircraft at a cost of
N$2,000,000. It is estimated that 45% of the cost is
attributable to the frame of the aircraft, which has
an expected useful life of 20 years. The remainder
of the cost is attributable to the engines, which
need to be replaced every 5 years.
Required:
A. Calculate the annual depreciation.
B. Assume that the engines are replaced at the end of
year 4 at a cost of N$1,300,000(earlier than expected
due to an accident on the runway). How should this
be accounted for?
Major inspection
• When an asset requires regular major inspection as a
condition to its continued use, then the cost thereof
must be capitalized.
• On acquiring assets that has already undergone a
major inspection, a portion of the cost must be
allocated to the inspection component by reducing on
pro-rata basis the costs of the other components.
• The inspection component is depreciated over the
period until the date of the next inspection.
• On next inspection, the remaining carrying amount of
previous inspection should be derecognized, and the
cost of the new inspection capitalized.
Example: 5
A machine is acquired at a cost of N$500,000. This machine
consists of two components, namely component A , with a
cost of N$300,000 and useful life of 15 years and component
B with a cost of N$200,000 and useful life of 12 years. A major
inspection, covering both components, needs to be
performed every three years. On acquisition of the machine,
an inspection similar to the one that will be performed after
three years, costs N$20,000 (present value).
Required:
A. Calculate the annual depreciation.
B. Provide the journal entries for year 3 if at the beginning of the
3rd year, the inspection is performed at a cost of N$24,000.
A)
Solution
Inspection component (20,000/3) 6,667
Component A [300,000 –(20,000x300,000/500,000]/15 19,200
Component B [200,000 –(20,000x200,000/500,000]/12 16,000
Total Depreciation 41,867
B)
(dr) Accumulated depreciation: Machine: Inspection cost 13,334
(dr) Loss on derecognition 6,667
(cr) Machine: Inspection (Cost) 20,000
Derecognition of previous inspection
• Components
o On initial recognition, significant parts can be depreciated separately
o Entity may choose to depreciate insignificant parts separately
o The remainder after allocating significant parts should be depreciated
separately or if consumption patterns are different, use approximation
techniques to calculate depreciation.
Depreciation
• Depreciation begins when it is available for
use
• Depreciation ceases:
o At date asset is classified as held for sale in terms
of IFRS 5, and
o The date the asset is derecognized
• Depreciation continues even when an asset is
idle/retired unless depreciation is based on
the number of units manufactured.
Depreciation
• Depreciation methods
o Straight-line(equal parts)
o The diminishing balance method
o Unit of production
Revaluations
• Subsequently PPE can be measured at cost(cost less accum
depreciation & accumulated impairment losses) or
revaluation(FV at date of revaluation less subsequent
accumulated depreciation & subsequent accumulated
impairment losses)
• To use revaluation model, FV of the assets should be
reliably measurable
• To use this model you must also revalue the entire class
simultaneously. Revaluations should be made with
sufficient regularity.
• Class of assets is a grouping of assets of a similar nature &
use e.g. Land, Machinery, Furniture & Fittings
• Revaluation is accounted for using either net replacement
or gross replacement method
Revaluation surplus