€ 80/LE/E0 wd OL 1d the following scenario (based on a real discipline low, based on the information in the si Scenario for Question answer the six question that foll nario. sing car wash in the munic Sigma, the owner of an ¢ Preparation of design drawis drawings were prep 7 Drawings, entitled “ABC Carwash & Storage, electrical and plumbing he preparation of the Gamma Drawings, Sigma submitted them to Omicron, chief Shortly after t 2 y building official, at the time, for the ABC mu for his consideration. Sigma and Omicron a ‘ons over the next year to discuss the project, but Omicron was never met on multiple occasic : ject, b i th the drawings and identified an evolving series of deficiencies. At Sigma’s request, Gamma revised. swings in an attempt to incorporate Omicron’s recommendations, Despite fhe revisions, Omicron continued to be critical of the drawings and would not issue-a building permit for the project. eee Engineer Kappa and his emplover, Best Civil Engineering Company (BCEC), licensed in Ontario, were re Sigma Kappa and BCEC understood that their r ‘Was limited to providing a Gamma Drawings. Kappa applied his engineering seal to all Gamma structural review o} Drawings — Shortly thereafter, Si submitted the stamped drawings t determining whether a buildi it ject), Onticron thenleantemredl Kappa directly to discuss architectural deficiencies he had identified in the drawings, and Kappa told Omicron that his review wings was limited to a structural review. Omicron identified numerous deficiencies in the drawings relating to Ontario Building Code and refused to issue a buildi it. Finally, in frustration, Sigma decided not to proceed with the roject and withdrew his application. A building permit was never granted for the proposed Se a he balding » The building was never built. 1. When Engineer Kappa checked the drawings for structural loadings, a) He was correct to stamp all the drawings. b) He was supposed to check the conformity to Ontario Building Code. .2) He was responsible for all the information contained in the drawings. 2. The proposed building was never built. “ayeThis fact has no bearing when evaluating engineer Kappa behaviour. b) If the building was not built, nobody is at default, ©) Omicron was not qualified to check the plans. d) None of the above, . Engineer Kappa and his company BCBC were specialized in structural engineering and had been paid to check the integrity of the structure. The structural drawings were correct and not in violation of the Ontario Building Code. The problems were with the other drawings. Using the professional engineer stamp on all drawings was in violation of the code of ethics, specifically: »a) iti 6) Ly. co) 4 d) 3 e) Til i 1a were diligent and had stamped only the structural drawings, and had made aaa eae onal the ober Gawings, such as plumbing and eleccca, that only the ARH checking was completed done by him:? a) Would not make any difference in judging the case : b) Would satisfy that he was doing his duty to the best of his knowledge in structural engineering. ¢) Would be judged as ethical behaviour. 8) None of the above. 5. Ifthe building had been built and the drawings, stamped by engineer Kappa, used as submitted in construction a) The public safety might have been endangered b) The owner of the building would have been in violation of Ontario Building Code c) Liability in law might have occurred e) None of the above 6. The drawings were completed by a foreign firm (i.e. USA). 8) The laws in Canada prohibit the usage of foreign firms; the project must be done by a Canadian firm “PysThe drawings must conform with rules and regulations in the jurisdiction for which they are intended to be used. ©) Engineer Kappa was not allowed to seal drawings done by a foreign firm. ‘A professional engineer seal on a drawing implies that the person that put the seal there has checked the drawing for conformity with local statutes and regulations e) Both (b) and (4). 7. In order tobe eligible for professional engineering status in Ontario some minimum academic requirements must be met. Which of the following statements is NOT true: a) graduation from an engineering program. q De i cradintion:conentase ane engineering program in Canada ¢) graduation from a science program. ©) graduation from a technologist program me 8 Bribery i ribery is: Pe] a) illegal sf 6) immoral ~ ) unethical Ss ‘dealboftheabove co w a o€ 80/1E/E0 wd OL ve on the board of XYZ Construction Company, which is planning a development in your town. The development has attracted criticism from citizens who called a meeting to organize opposition. You attended the meeting and spoke in favor ofthe development, Which one of the following options is most consistent with professional ethical principles? ‘ a) Speak in favor of the development without identifying your affiliation with XYZ, because your support is based solely on the merit of the project : b) Speak in favor of the development without identifying your affiliation with XYZ, because you have as much right as anyone in your town to voice your opinion ©) Speak in favor of the development and preface your statement by identifying yourself as an engineer whose opinion is supported by engineering analysis, but without identifying your affiliation with XYZ. =a), Speak in favor of the development and preface your statement by identifying your affiliation with XYZ, also stating you are exercising your right as a citizen 10. You area registered engineer working for a large design and construction firm. You would like to be more independent, so you decide to practice your entrepreneurial spirit by taking on very small design contracts on your own, working evenings and weekends to meet the contracts. You do not inform your supervisor of your activity, but your firm would not consider bidding on these small contracts as they would be more bother than they are worth. Is this a conflict of interest situation? a) Yes b) No Scenario for Questions 11-15, Read the following scenario (based on a real discipline hearing). Then, answer the five questions that follow, based on the information in the scenario Company A was engaged by a municipality to conduct a class environmental assessment for the expansion and upgrading of the municipality’s sewage treatment facilities ‘The Mayor of the municipality asked engineer Black, a specialist inthe field, and the owner of engineering Company B, to attend a public meeting where Company A would present the report. Engineer Black was not able toattend the meeting but two other engineers from his company were present at the meeting, The engineers reported the facts from the public meeting to their boss and CEO of the company, engineer Black. Engineer Black immediately wrote a letter to the Mayor of the municipality, Black ‘made accusations with respect to Company A's professional integrity and accused Company A of asia conflict interes Blac ant ome een Toe Tae jendations itr Company -A*s report Broa iter ead ie eat Company A failed to consider a process that Black invented and on which his company held patents. He also described Company As engineers as incompetent, Gubleading and selFserving, He did not send a copy of the letter to company A, but did ask the mayor to do so. Company A’s engi Suncincnariey ers wrote a detailed response to the technical criticisms in Black's letter that ents of the kind ma sine jhe municipality was concerned about the cost ofthe recommendations in the Company A report Black and another local consulting engineer, walked around the municipality looking for drainage problems and concluded that the probable main cause of th mwas Jnfitration from several sources. They recommended a television inspection ofthe sewer system to see if this was the case, and t6 identify solutions, The municipality followed this advice, identified the& = Ww on =] So co w wud || Jlaces where infiltration was occurring, and eliminated the problem. The municipality did not ex ie lagoon as had been recommended by Company A. 11. Engineer Black indicated another solution to the municipality, and his solution was adopted. id i iticize Company A. Re ee erect ince he Major tat Conaay Maen ean °) He is a better engineer. qd None of the above 12, _ Black wrote the letter to the Mayor commenting on another engineer(s) technical solution a) Black was not entitled to write the letter to the Mayor. ? b) _ Black should have to send a copy of the letter to Company Ae oO Black’s personal comments on the competence of engineers employed of Company A is unethical behaviour , 4) Both (b) and (c). 13, Considering the above facts , does the fact that Company A did not recommend Black patented process in the recommended solution ka) Have any bearing in the letter written by engineer Black? . : b) Can imply that the letter written by Black is self serving and not in the best interest of the nunicipality. Nc) _ Prove that Company A is not competent. d) _ None of the above, 14, When considering Black’ actions Black as described in the scenario, the following paragraphs of the Code of Ethics apply: a) Ti ’) Till 0) (a) and (b) d) 4 q e) 3 15. Criticism of another professional engineer's opinion might be appropriate in certain circumstances, a) Itis appropriate to attack colleagues b) Itis appropriate to maliciously injure reputation of other engineers °) {tis appropriate to criticize with the engineer’s knowledge, providing using a proper professional tone is used 4) All of the above. 16. A requirement for maintaining competence to practice engineering is that an engineer a) Maintain membership in a professional engineering society. b) Take a continuing education course for credit at least once every two years °) Read the monthly magazine for your engineering discipline d) Maintain current knowledge of your discipline, 17. Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of a profession? a.€ 80/LE/E0 = ai a) Specialized knowledye b) Reapanaiitity to the public ©) Self Regulation @) High Salary 18. You are presenting the experinvental work ofa multidisciplinary biomedical . ai ‘AN ehwiieering conference, One of your colleagues, Jim, has just wtival modeling Of the experimental data two days prior to the yaa Has agreed to let you use the results. Jim's name is not on the ‘hocaute the abstract aid paper were completed two months prior to the ‘What is the most appropriate way to recognize his contribution? 4) TheFe is No Need to recognize Jim's contribution because the abstract and paper Wore completed Oo Months prior to the conference b) Thee is no need to recognize Jim's contribution because he has agreed to Let you uve his work. ©) Mention it your talk that the mathematical modeling was carried out by A @) Add the statement "Mathematical modeling by Jim" in the slide 19, Bthios is the wtudy af a goodevil Dy Hhwvwrong °) ioo’badt @ helpfavharmel ) all of the above: The purpose of licensing engineering corporation is a) protect the public against inoompetence, negligence and professional iniseantuet vb) ‘Wentit\ing the individuals responsible for engineering services 2 allowing the corporation to charge higher engineering fees d) (a) and Cb) ® all of the above Scenario for Questions 21.26, Road the following scenario. Then, answer the six questions that follow, based on the iMAwynation in the scenario, Foundation and Ground te. is an ot geotechnical engineering and textin Provinces in Canada, incl nngineering firm that provides civil, mechanical and ng services, The company has offices throughout several ding Ontario, and has won numerous awards Engineer Savoy, a licensed profossional engineer, is the President of Foundation and Ground Ine. Savoy's company provides ¥ervices for projects Foundation and Ground Inc, designs as well as for projects designed by othory€ 80/LE/E0 |! \d Ground Inc's clients, Engineer Savoy relies ona tion and Ground Inc.’s field In performing services on behalf of Foundati ‘ upon the information, data and reports provided to her by Foundat technicians and testing employees. fi ind Inc.'s practice have recently Certain engineering firms in the area of Foundation and Grou P re e et ee lve mena no srking 100 arms and Tefated testing firms, The union local active in the a Foundation and'Ground-inc’sTield technicians and testing personnel into the same union Jocal that Fepresents the construction workers whose work Foundation and Ground Inc. field representatives observe, test and otherwise evaluate, The union local has a member disciplinary provision in its bylaws prohibiting any union members from making derogatory or disparaging remarks about any fellow union members or their performance. This provision is more commonly referred to by the union workers as the "no-rat’ “provision. — Engineer Savoy signs and seals reports that she receives from field technicians and testing employees, after carefully reviewing the contents of the reports. If these personnel become members of the union, Engineer Savoy says she will face an ethical dilemma. She feels she will not be able to sign and seal reports that she receives from field technicians and testing employees who are members of a union with a member disciplinary provision in their bylaws prohibiting any Union members from making derogatory or disparaging remarks about any fellow union members “or their j ice. She says that the “no-rat" provision could mean field technicians and testing ee mies loyees will Not point out errors in the work of others, even if they detect it 21. _ The “no-rat" provision in the union by laws is of concern because it: 7a) prohibits any and all criticism of the work performed by field technicians and testing employees, ~¥) could jeopardize the public health, safety and welfare. ©) _ should not be of concern to Engineer Savoy because it applies to employees who are not licensed engineers (ie, field technicians and testing employees), 4) (@) and (b). ©) None of the above 22. Parts of the PEO Code of Ethics that could be affected by the “no rat” provision include: a) An engineer should not make unfair statements about other a a engineer should guard and Protect the ileetas Teete e engineer should not place the public welfare in jeopardy. & band) iam OF None of the above. Engineer Savoy's concerns are valid because x 2 Engineers can not in general deal with members of Unions. Engineers can not in general deal wit nions ion’s abil = fem use deal with members of Unions due to the Union’s ability to g ‘aving employees of Foundation and Ground Inc. who are i Foundation . members of a Ut allow Engineer Savoy’s engineering authority to be transferred to 2 eesengineering maiter involving public safety ~ 4) Allofthe above ? ) _Noneofthe above, 24, Because of the “no rat” provision, Union members could be subject to a) Excessive workloads b) —_Conficted loyalties. ©) _ Intimidation 8) (b) and (c). ©) Allofthe above ____ 25. The objective of sound engineering practice will be compromised by the presence of the union disciplinary provision in its bylaws prohibiting any union member from making derogatory or disparaging remarks about any other fellow union member or their performance for the fi son(s): eee ES vaio disciplinary provision, unionized field technicians and testing personnel may not in all cases provide reliable technical information 9) Unionized field technicians and testing personnel will normally not consider themselves ___bound by this union disciplinary provision © 18 Field technicians and testing employees are usually not fully committed to serving the P . interests of the public welfare, and as @ consequence will not provide the information : necessary for Engineer Savoy to perform proper engineering services for her clients and to protect the public health and safety. 4) (@)and (©) ©) Alloftthe above 26, The union disciplinary provision in its bylaws prohibiting any union member from making derogatory or disparaging remarks about any other fellow union member or their performance 8) Would prohibit Engineer Savoy from criticizing the work of field technicians on testing personnel, b) Would prohibit field technicians and testing personnel from ctiticizing the work of Engineer Savoy. © Would prohibit Engineer Savoy from criticizing the work of other engineers, 4) (@)and (b). ©) —_ None of the above, 27. Ethical dilemmas relating to engineering activities in entertainment co: mpanies (like movie Droducers and theme park operators) can arise during the follo a) ppoosing @ supplier of robotic dinosaurs, where the engineer making the choice is iased, 8) choosing a supplier of robotic dinosaurs, where the engineer making the choice is not biased, but is perceived to be. ©) the selection of software engineering tools for movie special effects from two competing providers of such tools d all ofthe above, ®) none of the above, € 80/1E/E0 —s as€ 80/1E/E0 iit 28. 30. 31 32, “ to another the duty of one engineer code of Ethics of Professional Engineers Ontario, oe Ea oa aa ae Ae er management company in the Industrial Engine 1g engineer who works for a finai agement companies do not undertake engineering Department: iced in the Facilities Engineering Department of a) _ is not applicable since financial man: D) \¢ different if the engineer wor jancial management compai would be the same if the enginee the financial management compan dé) (@and(o) ©) none of the above You find yourself facing an ethical dilemma regarding an engineering matter in a multinational company operating in Singapore. The factors you should take into account in deciding your course of action include the following: the number of workers who may die as a consequence of your decision. a) b) the number of people in the general population who may die as a consequence of your ) d) the number of people in the of your decision ©) _allof the above. The appropriate course of action is usually straightforwardly identified for an engineer faced with an ethical dilemma when: a) the actions involved in the dilemma are illegal and unethical. §) the only harm likely to result from the actions involved in the dilemma is financial ©) no one is likely to be financially harmed. d) _alloftthe above e) none of the above. irked in the Facilities Engineering Department of 9 decision. the number of workers who may lose money as a consequence of your decision. general population who may lose money as a consequence An engineer working in a small company for six years is promoted to the posit Manag of Technical Services in the company. Such an engineer eae ad 8) _haslless demands on her time and fewer responsibilities than i industry in a non-managerial role "ee 5) has the same demands on her time and the same responsibilit engin ; works in industry ina non-manageril roe ie Se Toes not experience ethical dilemmas because she is in charge of the mpany’ ‘tatmice! Services division and can leave the day-to-day engineering een a wve the day-to-day engineering to others ©) none of the above. Zhe Code of Ethics of Professional Engineers Ontario and the Cod, Sh Tage cagineering society.” paprmio gm the Conger Rihicaag 4) ate useful in that they allow engine 15 to adhere to either one or the other in order to 0 adhere to either one or the other 6) have similarities in areas relating to the publie-welfuce 7 ©) are both intended with guidance on their self interests } sane mainly to provide engineers with gui lf:& = w ea te So co w Cl €) _alloftthe above. ; : federal government 33, Engineers who take on management roles in research laboratories of the federal g sometimes must address a) ethical dilemmas b) _ issues involving human resour ©) decisions involving financial and material resources d) —_allofthe above ) none of the above faced by their employees, 34 Anengineer who is an employee of a company should, as a consequence of an engineer's duty to his employer: : a) accept all assignments given to him, regardless of what is asked b) dispute the company’s requests when called for, but no more than once a year ¢) _ learn about new engineering processes of relevance to the employer’s business activities. 4 (and) ©) _ none of the above 35, AS # consequence of an engineer’s duty to one’s employer, an engineer who is an employee of company’ a) can not take part in a strike against the employer. b) can be part of a labour union, °) can not help expand the membership of a labour union d) all of the above, 8 none of the above Scenario for is 36-40. Read the following scenario entitled “Sales of furnaces are resumed after four months at Hot Furnaces R Us”. Then, answer the five questions that follow, based on the ‘information in the scenario write-up, Sales of furnaces are resumed after four months at Hot Furnaces RUs Four months ago, Several accidents involving the new Fumace 3000 prompted the company “Hot Furnaces R Us” to tell Stores selling the furnace Not to sell the any until further notice. ‘Yester the company announced sales can resume, oS te ABY unl further noi © company announced sles can resum The eee ance 3000 has been on sale in Ontario for 15 months. Hot Furnaces R Us introduced the Furnace 3000 Jast year and sold 62 during the ear. Hot Fi Up to the time of the stoppage of sales, by ‘4 forte See athe furnace was to blame for the accidents. Of the injuries, the Cro of the company was quoted in the Globe and Mail .s R Us feels it is not responsible for the accidents that resulted the furnace maker de nvolved severe burns, THE as saying, “Hot Furna wspaper naces R Us spokesperson, who handles company communications on recalls and product said the company issued a “stop delivery” notice to dealers four: months ago but liftedithe San effective yesterday. The spokesperson pointed out, “An internal investigation identified ents wele.not-the fault of the company, and that the product is sound ct that the accidents involving the Furnace 3000 led to a fatality makes Hot Fumaces R Us more responsible for determining if the Furnace 3000 was the cause of the accidents, than if no fatality occurred, >) forced Hot Furnaces R Us to investigate the cause of the accidents, whereas this was not necessary when no fatality had yet occurred, just injuries ©) makes Hot Furnaces R Us responsible for the accidents involving the Furnace 3000. dd) @and() ©) none of the above The fact that the Furnace 3000 is “high-priced’ a) does not help determine if Hot Fumaces R Us acted unethically. b) implies that the Furnace 3000 is safe. ©) implies that the Furnace 3000 can not be the cause of the accidents, sin ce the high price indicates that safely measures in the Furnace 3000 were not compromised to axe money. 4) (a)and (0). ©) none of the above. assessment, with the full cooperation the Furnace 3000 was not responsible. Hot Fumaces R Us, after studying the situation, decided that o company deems not to be its responsibi eat esponsibility, was the likely cau, none of the above, »perator error, which the se of the accidents, all of the above,B ~ Ww os ~ So co Ww ZL ors and syery” notice to dealers i fetopidel 40. The fact that Hot Furnaces R Us overtummed its own “stop 4 decided to resume sales indicates that a) Hot Furnaces R Usis ethical Hot Furnaces R Us is unethical ioe 2 ) Hot Fumaces R Us is only concerned with making sales 20° @ . @and(O) ¢) __ none of the above. = p) to each statement. Read the following statement carefully and answer true (a) or false (b) 41 __ Ethical behaviour is timeless and universal. __-TRUE(a) FALSE (b) a ‘ impact 42 Engineers with purchasing responsibility should not be accountable for the imp: sunnliers have on the envigonment. ‘TRUE (a) FALSE (b) % 43 Canadian citizens want business to contribute to broader societal goals. | TRUE(@) FALSE (b) 44 Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) is growing slowly because investors are only concerned about the financial return TRUE(@) FALSE (b) 45. _Ifitis legal it is ethical TRUE (@) FALSE (b) 46. The 2006 World Wildlife Fund ‘Living Planet Report’ indicates that advances in more efficient and environmentally friendly vehicles have significantly reduced our impact on the planet TRUE (a) FALSE (b) 7 ae Tfallowed by law, it can be ethical for Canadian engineers responsible for workers health and safety and the environment in developing countries to have lower health and safety or environmental standards than those used in Canada TRUE (a) FALSE (b) 47. 48. Economic growth in a country will always result in reducing povert TRUE (a) FALSE (b) ee 49. Unknowingly failing to comply with laws and i i Gent and regulations is an example of unethical behaviour. 50. The focus of a Management System is to ensure that identified actions, and legal and self fi oe gal and self-regulatory requirements are managed and appropriat TRUE (a) FALSE (b) impacts and outcomes 'e internal controls are in€ 80/LE/E0 wd Z| Sl 52. 56. 61. 9 8 gS 0 26000 will provide gui t responsibili tions and vide gui izati sponsibility for its act idance to organizations to accept ISO 2 gui omissions but not those of its suppliers TRUE(@) FALSE (b) i 2 Is Failure of governments to enforce existing laws concerning the environment and workers right: True is one of the reasons for the Montreal Consensus. TRUE (a) FALSE (b) The focus of AA 1000 is to increase quality in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting to all stakeholders TRUE(@) FALSE () An engineer who does not consider the impact that his / her design (either products, processes or services) has on ‘the environment or on employees is acting unethically. TRUE (@) FALSE (b) ‘The rapid advancements in science and technology have not enabled the environment to absorb the unprecedented growth in human activity TRUE (a) FALSE (b) pociety recognizes that the negative impact of human activity is outweighed by societal benefits. TRUE (a) FALSE (b) A -Anti-corruption is covered in the UN Global Cor as well as the OECD Guidelines, TRUE (a) FALSE (b) a i The Montreal Consensus says that globalization and trade liberalization should bring improved Prosperity to all TRUE (a) FALSE (b) TRUE (a) FALSE (b) Not every engineering project affects the ‘environment. TRUE (a) FALSE (b) Engineers. ‘alane-can-provide the Solutions to environmental ‘Problems. TRUE (a) FALSE (b) SR will not provide an organization with a TRUE (@) FALSE (b) Companies can limit damage to their reputat lealing ode violations or environmental abu: anita ses, TRUE(@) FALSE (b) Way to identify and manage risks Openly with problems of. labour TRUE (a) FALSE (b)a ~S w as = So co w a a ization The ISO 14001 Enviror System (EMS) will ensure that an organiza has identified its signif TRUE (a) FALSE (b) S Engineers should not be held accountable for knowing which laws and regulations or industry é gineers should not be held accountable standards relate to what their organization does TRUE (a) FALSE (b) 66. An ISO 14001 EMS will en: regulations and standards at the ti TRUE (@) FALSE () 67 OHSAS 18001 Health and Safery the hazards and risks thas their emp TRUE@) FALSE (b) 68 ISO 26000 will provide international best Practice guiding principles and framework for CSR and Sustainable Develonenent TRUE (a) FALSE (b) organization is aware of all of the related laws, 6 registration audit. yerent System will ensure that employers are aware of. 28 ase exposed to. Read the following carefully and choose the best possible answer(s) for each statement / question 69. Social Responsibility (SR) is abo a) Maximizing shareholders p obeying the laws, 4) The responsibility of an organization for the impacts of its decisions and activities on society and the envisonment © Creating jobs in countries with less stringent environmental laws <) Governments leaving it upto corporations 10 implement SR policies 2) Allof the above 7. Approcess for Social Responsibility and a) Increasing sales b) Reducing cost Ho) Identifying and managing risk 4) All of the above Sustainable Development could result in: 71. The principles of the G20 Montreal Consensus state that: 8) Globalization must be beneficial to ail » There 1s a need for greater distribution of the benefits of ‘slobalization ©) The poor need to be shielded from the otential ti i See po negative impact of globalizationcal system. se of the ecological sy is about economic growth atthe expense Of err ion of d) Sustainable slag is about eonon Been economic e) Sustainable development is al able resources. irrepla ‘The World Wildlife Fond Tine Fes theo ae and the pressure on the biosphere aaeine ° omthe nomen consunption of natural resources b) Reflects the health ce ioc sc ere ® ce thst cee nance ae resources 25% faster than they can be renewed e) Allofthe above, 74 SRisabout: a) Knowing your stakeholders and their expectations b) Measuring and reporting on stakeholder satisfaction, ©) An organization wide commitment to stakeholder satisfaction d) Having a systematic approach to continual improvement 8 Allofthe above 75. Thanks to rapid advances in engineering and technology there is a decline in: a) The negative impact of business and society on the environment b) Extreme poverty arising from the acceleration of globalization ©) Human rights violations by individuals, families, corporations and civil society organizations ) None of the above 76. The UN Global Compact is a voluntary initiative to promote sustainable develo j 8) ‘The UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights pment bee dion P b) The International Lab; i age ) Righter Week #00 Organization (ILO) Declaration on Fundamental Principles and ®) Rio declaration on Environment and Development @ Allofthe above 77. Organizations need a Risk Management S; stem because: —Wa) Competent employees take shortcut i jor ri B) All organizations age ke Sporteuts and unknowingly take major risks ©) To eliminate risks i 4) Ithelps you find the guil i 6) Allofthoabens 1? Sulty party when something goes wrong a ASO 26000 SR will provide practical gu 00 SR wil guidance related to: ) Integrating and implements ighout an organization and i indng ts supply chan eS O¥BHOM an organization and its sphere of influence, ») Identifying and engaging with stakeholders Q) Communicating commitments and performance relating to SR € 80/LE/EO I Fiction 77 of the O. Reg. 941. 77 Professional Engineers Ontario Code of Ethics, § > The following is the Code of Ethics of the Association: Hioner’s clients, to other members 1. Itisthe duty of a practitioner to the public, to the practitioner's employer, to the pr of the practitioner's profession, and to the practitioner tact at all times with, i. faimess and loyalty to the practitioner's associates, employers, clisats, subordinates and employees, iifidelity to public needs, iiidevotion to high ideals of personal honour and professional integrity, Iwknowledge of developments inthe area of professional engincering relevant to any services that are undertaken, and ‘.competence in the performance of any professional engineering services that are undertaken 2. A practitioner shall, sick public regard forthe practitioner's profession by extending the public knowledge thereof and discouraging untrue, unfair or exaggerated ctatements with respec to professional engineering, iiinot express publicly, or while the practitioner is Sa witness before a court, commission or other tribunal, piions on professional engineering matters that are nt Iounded on adequate knowledge and honexe conviction, ‘Werdeavor to keep the practitioner's licence, temporary licence, limited licence or certificate of authorization, as the case bi ‘may be, permanently displayed in the practitioners place of business 3 Apr Carman oben ater for cach employer as fitful agent ortrustce and shal an ‘and avoid or disclose a conflict of interest that might influence the practitioner's actions or judgment. Sonat eg toner must disclose immediatly tothe practitioner's client an might must di : ty interest, direct or indi Susie rica in ay way tothe professional jodgment ofthe one oe rendering sevice otis clea, : i Hi i i i So ore sso hip be ccing: ot engnecha ee cape Subordinates, and extend the pepebtattoner shall maintain the honour and before the proper onour and integrity ofthe 3 gy “Beni wooesiont dienee eiea coer POSE td wit aro four mos ag ‘Practit a So oo w e a w S 16