Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Beneficiality)
Today, I would like to present the opposing side of the debate on whether it is
beneficial to have a gun in every family in the Philippines. It is important to consider
the drawbacks and potential negative consequences. Here are the claims I want to
highlight in this debate. First, is the Accidents and Misuse of a gun in a Household
setting or structure of a person who owns a gun and lastly the escalation of violence.
So let's start on the first claim. One of the main concerns with having a gun in
every family is the risk of accidents and misuse. Firearms, if not handled properly
that can lead to unintentional injuries and even fatalities. According to Section 28
of Republic Act 10591, also known as the "Comprehensive Firearms and Ammunition
Regulation Act" prohibits the unlawful acquisition or possession of ammunition and
penalizes the offense with a minimum prison term of six (6) to twelve (12) years.
There is a case wherein the acccidental death of a 12 years old boy with dad’s gun
in San Jose Del Monte, Bulacan. The Bulacan provincial police’s initial report said
the boy managed to get hold of the PNP-issued gun owned by his father and
brought it to his school at the Benito Nieto Elementary School in their hometown.
The son shot himself inside a school around 5:40 am on Wednesday. Take note that
these cases, the guns belong to an armed personnels who are undergone to trainings
and know the rules of how to store properly a gun.
As of March 8, 2204 the Philippine National Police (PNP) has classified over
700,000 guns with expired licenses as loose firearms. In a three-month crackdown,
they recovered, surrendered and confiscated a total of 8, 255 loose firearms.
An armed citizens can act as a deterrent to criminals, there is evidence to suggest that
the proliferation of firearms can actually conribute to an increase of crime rates. 67%
proliferation of firearms is a major cause of crime and violence in the Philippines
and also showed that nearly four out of five Filipinos favor a law allowing only
law enforcers and licensed private security guards to carry firearms in public
places surveyed by the Pulse Asia. And in the Article 5, Section 32 of RA 10591
Unlawful Manufacture, Importation, Sale or Disposition of Firearms or Ammunition
or Parts Thereof, Machinery, Tool or Instrument Used or Intended to be Used in
the Manufacture of Firearms, Ammunition or Parts Thereof
The penalty of reclusion temporal1 to reclusion perpetua shall be imposed upon any
person who shall unlawfully engage in the manufacture, importation, sale or
disposition of a firearm or ammunition, or a major part of a firearm or ammunition, or
machinery, tool or instrument used or intended to be used by the same person in the
manufacture of a firearm, ammunition, or a major part thereof…
In sum, the proposal to have gun in every family in the Philippines is fraught with
severe risks and potential negative repercussions. These include the frightening
possibility of accidents and misuse, especially in households with children and the
alarming escalation of violence that could incite. The grim reality is that firearms,
even when owned by trained personnel's can be a source of tragic incidents as
evidenced by the heartbreaking case of the 12-year old boy in San Jose Del Monte,
Bulacan. Furthermore, the presence of firearms can exacerbate violence, leading to
impulsive decisions in heated arguments and increased the domestic violence. The
fact that the Philippines has one of the highest rates of intentional killings using
firearms in Asia and that the majority of Filipinos believe that the proliferation of
firearms is a major cause of crime and violence underscores the gravity of the
situation. Therefore, the potential drawbacks of having gun in every household
appear to far outweigh any perceived benefits, urging a reconsiderations of this
proposition for the safety and well-being of Filipino families.