You are on page 1of 5

Śakti 843

assembles as the maṇḍala (vāstupūjā). The para- Tantric Studies in Memory of Hélène Brunner, Pondicherry,
digm of the body of man also applies to the mea- 2007, 99–112.
surement of the main image in the central shrine Heesterman, J.C., The Broken World of Sacrifice: An Essay
in Ancient Indian Ritual, Chicago, 1993.
of a temple. The height, width, and so on are mea- Heesterman, J.C., “Self-Sacrifice in Vedic Ritual,” in: S. Shaked
sured by the forearm, hand, and digits of either et al., eds., Gilgul, Leiden, 1987, 91–106.
patron ( yajamāna) or main sculptor (sthāpati). Kramrisch, S., The Hindu Temple, 2 vols., Calcutta, 1946.
Puruṣa, being measured and providing measure, Malinar, A., The Bhagavadgītā: Doctrines and Contexts,
is thus in many ways connected with the origin of Cambridge UK, 2007.
form (Bäumer, 1982) and thus with the corporeal Mus, P., “Oú finit puruṣa?”in: Mélanges d´indianism à la
dimensions of existence, individual and cosmic. mémoire de Louis Renou, Paris, 1968, 539–563.
Nilakantam, R., “Prakṛti and Puruṣa in the Bhagavadgītā,”
IA 3/1, 1964, 254-264.
Parpola, A., “Human Sacrifice in India in Vedic Times
Bibliography and Before,” in: J.N. Bremmer, ed., The Strange World of
Human Sacrifice, Leuven, 2007, 157–177.
Bakker, H.T., “Human Sacrifice (Puruṣamedha), Construc- Srinivasan, D.M., Many Heads, Arms and Eyes: Origin,
tion Sacrifice and the Origin of the Idea of the ‘Man of Meaning and Form of Multiplicity in Indian Art, Leiden,
the Household’ (Vāstupuruṣa),” in: J.N. Bremmer, ed., 1997.
The Strange World of Human Sacrifice, Leuven, 2007, Tripathi, G.C., “On the Concept of ‘Puruṣottama’ in the
179–194. Āgamas,” in: A. Eschmann, H. Kulke & G.C. Tripathi,
Bäumer, B., “Puruṣa and the Origin of Form,” in: B. Bäumer, eds., The Cult of Jagannath and the Regional Tradition
ed., Rūpa Pratirūpa: Alice Boner Commemoration Volume, of Orissa, New Delhi, 1978, 31–59.
New Delhi, 1982, 27–34. Yamaguchi, E., “The Concept of Puruṣa in the Sāṃ khya
Filliozat, P.-S., “Note sur les modes de representation de System of Philosophy,” JORM 40–41, 1981, 167–178.
Sadāśiva dans l’ ordonnance iconographique et arcitec-
turale du temple,” in: D. Goodall & A. Padoux, eds., Angelika Malinar
Mélanges tantriques à la mémoire d’Hélène Brunner/

Śakti

The term śakti stems from the Sanskrit root śak-, meanings together. Mantras are a specific form of
“to have power to effect,” with a suffix -ktin, indi- language: like language, they express reality, but
cating the feminine gender. In general, the term unlike ordinary language, they possess magical
refers to power, strength, or energy. In the reli- power. Linguistic and cosmic powers are thus
gious context, Śakti stands for the Goddess connected, as language is but an extension of the
(→ Mahādevī), or the powers of the deities. From word principle (śabdabrahman; see → philosophy
Vedic Agni worship (→ Vedic gods) to later tantric of language). Since mantras are also used as weapons,
emanations (→ Tantrism), the meaning of śakti is the relation of śakti with weaponry is explicit.
consistent as the divine power, inseparable from Agni or fire is the most common metaphor uti-
the power holder. In subsequent development, lized to describe the ontological aspect of power.
Śakti is presented as the consort of → Śiva, with her The Vedic deity Agni is invoked as having seven
numerous manifestations. In puranic literature, “tongues,” such as → Kālī, Karālī, and so forth.
śakti also appears as a specific weapon of the gods, Early Śāktism emerges from worshipping seven or
of Subrahmaṇya in particular. Finally, the term eight “mothers” (mātṛkās; see → Śiva). It is reason-
śakti refers to the expressive power of able that early Śāktism, while keeping indigenous
language to describe reality through a direct practices alive, borrowed from or evolved out of
signifier – signified relation, through indication, Vedic literature. The Devīmāhātmya describes the
or through suggestion. Although at first glance Vedic gods separating their powers from their
these understandings do not appear intercon- body that in constellation manifests as a burning
nected, the concept of → mantra binds all these flame, from which emerges the mighty → Durgā.
844 Śakti
The Vijñānabhairava describes the relation of Śiva five Buddhas and their corresponding Śaktis
and Śakti as inseparable, comparing it to fire and (→ Buddhism and Hinduism).
its burning power. → Tantras describe the rise of The Goddess-worshipping tantric traditions
the serpentine power, kuṇḍalinī, with metaphors culminate with the Krama and Mahārtha phi-
of fire. Select terminology used in describing this losophical systems (see → Kashmir Śaivism),
power includes flame, heat, light, incineration, stemming from the worship of Kālī. Kashmiri phi-
and the burning sensation that occurs in the prac- losophers such as Kallaṭa, → Abhinavagupta,
titioner’s body. Shamans demonstrate their power Kṣemarāja, or Jayaratha, and the subsequent
by showing their control over fire in various thinkers such as Amṛtānanda, Śivānanda, or
ways. Maheśvarānanda, write substantially on the phi-
In tantric cosmology, Śakti stands for both the losophy and theology of Śakti, primarily
inseparable power of the divine and a separate cat- in congruence with Trika Śaivism, pioneered
egory, the manifestation of the power of by Vasugupta and Somānanda. Core texts in
autonomy inherent in Śiva. The Trika system this tradition are Parātriṃ śikā, Mālinīvijayottara,
(→ Kashmir Śaivism) identifies the three powers, Vāmakeśvara, Yoginīhṛdaya, Tantrāloka, Spandakārikā,
Parā, Parāparā, and Aparā, resonating of the Pratyabhijñāhṛdaya, Mahārthamañjarī, and Kāmakalā-
Viṣnụ purāṇa (6.7.61), where Parā is addressed as vilāsa. Philosophical hymns such as Kramastava,
the power of → Viṣnu ̣ and Aparā as the power in Saundaryalaharī, or Cidgaganacandrikā combine
the form of individual selves (kṣetrajña), and the esoteric contemplations with devotional ardor. While
power of action that is identified with ignorance early practices focused on the goddess Kālī, subse-
(→ avidyā). With the blend of this concept of quent Śākta movements glorify the enchanting
the divine triad and the → Sāṃ khya notion of three emanation of the Goddess, Tripurasundarī.
→ guṇas, Tantras provide a vivid picture
of the triadic form of Śakti. The triad of the
Goddess described in Devīmāhātmya – Mahākālī, Śākta Upāya and the Kuṇḍalinī
Mahālakṣmī (→ Śrī Lakṣmī), and Mahāsarasvatī Śakti
(→ Sarasvatī) – has received wide prominence.
The manifestation of Śakti is always found in Tantras describe three approaches to recognizing
pluralistic depiction (ŚvetU. 6.8; ViP. 1.3.2–3). reality: the śāṃ bhava, śākta, and āṇava means
Mantras construe the body of the deities, and each (upāya). The sudden flash of the truth without any
deity is invoked with various mantras. Conse- contemplation or by mere will is identified as
quently, each deity is endowed with multiple pow- śāṃ bhava; contemplation by mind without any
ers. This plurality of powers inherent in the deities utterance or physical effort, or realization by the
is the fundamental reason behind depicting them mere effort of awareness is considered śākta; and
with multiple arms adorned with various weapons external effort with the primacy of action is recog-
and gestures. In order to indicate various powers nized as āṇava. The Trika understanding of Śakti
intrinsic to the central deity, a deity in a → maṇḍala is deeply rooted in this Śākta approach, as the phi-
is always surrounded by various Śaktis. losophy of Krama that details the emergence of
Śaiva Tantras describe the fivefold powers of the Kālī maṇḍala relies on analyzing the sequen-
Śiva that carry out the acts of creation, sustenance, tial flow of consciousness from its pure and tran-
retrieval, concealment, and → grace. The concept scendent state to the state of mind formed as
of five Śaktis becomes prominent with the emer- external entities. Abhinavagupta makes a direct
gence of the “transmission” (āmnāya) system, link between Śakti and the Śākta approach by
where Śiva emanates in five different forms, each elaborating upon Krama while addressing the
having its own counterpart Śakti. These powers, śākta means.
identified as awareness, bliss, will, knowledge, and The inseparable link between Śakti and Śiva is
action, are the first to emanate in the cosmic man- quintessential to Tantras. As the text Vijñā-
ifestation of tantric categories. Often depicted as nabhairava suggests,
the five faces of Śiva and sometimes found in
→ liṅga forms with five faces, the five Śaktis consti- [The highest state of Bhairava is] transcendent
tute the primary maṇḍala. This depiction of pow- to [the concepts of] space and the movement of
ers in a pentad is also common to Buddhist time, and not particularized in terms of direc-
Tantras, with the tathāgatamaṇḍala consisting of tion and designation. [This state] is impos-
Śakti 845
sible to indicate. [This,] in reality, cannot be kuṇḍalinīs is also described, located in three dif-
described. The saturated state of the self identi- ferent centers of the body. There is also a concept
cal to Bhairava, [identified as] Bhairavī, is the of cosmic kuṇḍalinī, the collective form of all the
self-experience of bliss in the heart that is expe- individual kuṇḍalinīs. Tantras identify the awak-
rienced only when [one is] free from all the men- ening of this serpentine energy and its union with
tal constructs . . . The state of Bhairava described Śiva as → liberation, describing this in terms of the
as such is the transcendent state (parā), and also surge of innate bliss.
as the goddess Parā, due to it being the highest Nātha yogins (→ Nāth Sampradāya) address
form. Just as the identity between power and this power as kuṇḍalī. Described in terms of
power-holder is always established, due to the
cidvilāsa or “the play of → consciousness” and
reason that one is the property belonging to the
piṇḍabrahmāṇḍa or the doctrine that the → body
other [lit. property bearer], Parā is the power
is identical to the cosmos, these yogins follow the
[inherent in] the supreme self. The power of fire
to burn is not considered separate [from fire].
monistic worldview that all that exists is merely
This [distinct identification] is merely the initial the manifold presentation of consciousness. The
step towards the entry into the mere being of coiled form of the serpentine power in this depic-
awareness. (VijBhai. 14–19) tion stands for the dormant consciousness that is
intrinsic to all that exists. With its rise, a yogin is
The gnosis that arises through śākta means grants supposed to acquire the gnosis that his body and
the experience of the oneness of the self and the the cosmos that parallels the divine body are iden-
totality, while retaining individuality. In this sense, tical. It thus results in the yogin establishing iden-
the śākta approach is the recognition of duality as tity between himself and Śiva.
real, while confirming nonduality in the absolute Also related to the concept of śakti is the grace
sense. One returns to the self through śākta means, of this deified spontaneous pure awareness,
with the realization that all that appears is con- addressed in terms of the “emission of energies”
sciousness alone, and accepting consciousness as (śaktipāta). Essentially, this term refers to the will
the essential nature of the Goddess. Thus the entire of Śiva to reveal himself to individuals, and his
world, following the Śākta vision, is the very power grace bestowed upon them. Depending upon the
that is inherent in Śiva. The Śākta approach, there- intensity of the emission of the powers of Śiva,
fore, is a positive response in reaction to early individuals achieve their goal in a short or
renunciatory modes of Hinduism (see → āśrama extended period of time. Even the rise of the desire
and saṃ nyāsa). Following this perspective, the for liberation or finding a mentor relies on this
world is the extension or the blissful play of Śiva, divine grace.
and the self is realized through purification of
mental constructs by observing the rise and col-
lapse of concepts, as all these concepts embody the Essential Śākta Philosophy
very self-shining nature of Śakti. A widely distrib-
uted practice of embodied Śakti is that of While the Śākta traditions unequivocally endorse
kuṇḍalinī. a plurality of goddesses, they are philosophically
Tantras and the → Haṭha Yoga literature recog- monistic. The world in their depiction is the very
nize that every individual is endowed with emanation of the Goddess. She is often invoked as
kuṇḍalinī, a serpentine power, sleeping coiled at saṃ vid or citi, meaning consciousness. Pure con-
the base of the spine. This energy awakens with sciousness, in this depiction, is autonomous in
the practice of mantra, various gestures and pos- manifesting the world, and it displays the world
tures, and specific breathing exercises, and it even- within itself by its own free will. Two terms,
tually devours all the limiting factors. This process prakāśa and vimarśa, describe philosophical and
reflects the journey of the kuṇḍalinī through the theological aspects of this “consciousness” attain-
central channel to the crown of the head, where ing manifoldness. Prakāśa means light, but here, it
she unites with Śiva. The meeting is described in identifies the self-aware nature of consciousness.
plain terms such as yoga or “union” and is also Vimarśa describes awareness of objects, or the
depicted in the graphic imagery of sexual ecstasy. judgmental aspect of consciousness. It also sug-
Although a single kuṇḍalinī abiding in the body is gests the early epistemology where consciousness
very common in later Tantras, a system of three flows out and “touches” the objects so that
846 Śakti
consciousness arises. These two aspects are insep- inner cognitive modes. While the categories of
arable, like fire and its burning power. Tantras use paśyantī (seeing, the innermost verbalization that
the union of Śiva and Śakti as a metaphor to is identical to conceptualization), madhyamā
describe this self-reflexive awareness that assumes (“the middle one,” the level of speech when the
manifoldness while retaining its true nature. sound image is distinct from its reference, the
Prakāśa is also described as the seminal drop concept), and vaikharī (articulated, the audible
(bindu), which simultaneously stands for individ- speech) are explicit in Bhartṛhari’s writings, Tan-
uality and the first phoneme in Sanskrit, a. The tras add parā as the supreme speech and equate it
extension of this bindu, the self-aware cosmic with the goddess Parā. Beyond these similarities,
drop, in the form of orgasmic bliss, expressed in the concept of the powers of time, central to lin-
terms of ānanda, gives rise to phonetic expression guistic philosophy, is parallel to the powers of Śiva.
that culminates with the consonant “h” that stands As Śiva is often addressed as Mahākāla
for vimarśa. These two letters combined stand and Kālī as the goddess who transcends time
for subjective awareness, or aham (“I”), in the (kāla), this relation is not far-fetched. Ultimately,
Trika system. In maṇḍalas, the central deity or the the elemental Krama philosophy is found in
central drop refers to this very prakāśa, and Bhartṛhari’s writings when addressing the mani-
the surrounding layers relate to the phenomenal fold manifestation of the word principle. Besides
aspects of the divine body. The deities in the outer these similarities, there are also some historical
circles of a maṇḍala are thus the limbs of the cen- reasons to trace the early philosophy of Śakti in
tral divinity. the linguistic philosophy of Bhartṛhari. Not only
In addition to the philosophy of language pro- have Trika Śaivas closely read his philosophy, but
mulgated by such prominent philosophers as Helārāja, the commentator upon Bhartṛhari’s
→ Bhartṛhari and Nāgeśa, the major Hindu philo- works, is also the master of Abhinavagupta, the
sophical systems of → Nyāya and → Mīmāṃ sā prominent Kashmiri philosopher.
address the concept of śakti while discussing A closer look at Bhartṛhari’s philosophy makes
the signifying power of language. Most commonly this connection more pronounced. For Bhartṛhari,
addressed are the three śaktis of language: literal śaktis in plurality give rise to duality (VākPad.
significance (abhidhā), secondary indication 1.2). These śaktis are of a mutually exclusive char-
(lakṣaṇā), and suggestion (vyañjanā). Although at acter and are the very self of the word principle. As
first glance the theological and philosophical con- they are identical to brahman, they do not consti-
cepts of śakti appear distinct, they in fact tute duality (VākPad. 3.1.22). The two powers of
have many resemblances. The early Naiyāyikas, the word principle, space and time, are parallel to
followers of Nyāya, identify this linguistic the powers of consciousness (VākPad. 3.6.18). It is
power as “divine will.” Grammarians address noteworthy that the Trika system divides its six
the absolute in terms of the word principle categories into the “paths” of time and space. The
(śabdabrahman) that assumes manifoldness due śaktis, according to Bhartṛhari, allow the word
to the inherent powers of → brahman. The concep- principle to manifest successively by relying on
tual link between Bhartṛhari and the subsequent the power of sequence (VākPad. 1.86). Entities, in
tantric philosopher Abhinavagupta allows us to this depiction, are a mere constellation of portions
further explore the common ground between the of śakti (VākPad. 3.7.2). These powers are innate
signifying power and the cosmic Śakti. The con- to the word principle, revealed only at the moment
cept of mantra is the binding thread underlying of action (VākPad. 3.7.28). Bhartṛhari identifies
both philosophical and theological concepts of direction or space (dik) as a separate śakti (VākPad.
śakti: mantra, the power inherent in the deities 3.6.3–27). This power of space in the philosophy
and expressed through their weapons, is a specific of language parallels the energies of Śiva depicted
form of language. in five-fold sequence. Following this Śākta depic-
In addition to the aforementioned reasons that tion, Vāmeśvarī emits the world out of her own
relate cosmic and linguistic powers, the concept of body while manifesting the sequence, Khecarīs
pratibhā, the intuitive and spontaneous power of operate in the sky of consciousness, Gocarīs oper-
language, is at the core of both of these systems. ate on the planes characterized by speech, Dikcarīs
Furthermore, both systems categorize speech as operates in ten directions, and Bhūcarīs move on
moving from its external and auditory form to the the earth. Along the same lines, Bhartṛhari’s pre-
Śakti 847
sentation of kriyāśakti, the power of action that described by Bhartṛhari in terms of manifestation
brings about transformation in form, is compara- (unmīlana) and concealment (nimīlana; VākPad.
ble to Śiva’s power of action. 3.9.56) resonate of the entwined concepts of
The criticism by Trika Śaivas of linguistic phi- unmeṣa and nimeṣa (SpKā. 1.1) that stand for both
losophy is that the grammarians place paśyantī as the opening and closing of the eyes of Śiva
supreme, while they add another category, parā. and also for the manifestation and retrieval of
This refers to awareness itself that is identified as the world.
speech due to its inner expressive nature and also Śākta rituals endeavor to vivify this philosophy
identified as the Goddess. Explicitly, Trika Śaivas through maṇḍala worship, visualizations, and
advanced and deified nuances of speech, while mantra recitations, or through various yogic prac-
simply incorporating the early categories, the tices including the “piercing” (vedha) of the
three tiers of speech, into their system. This rela- → cakras through the rise of kuṇḍalinī. Śākta ritu-
tionship is vividly shown in Utpaladeva’s identifi- als can include, although not exclusively, elements
cation of paśyantī speech with the goddess that are forbidden in → Smārta Hinduism, such
Parāparā (ĪśPraKā. 1.5.13–14). Further confirm- as meat, liquor, dried grains, fish, and sexual
ing this link, Abhinavagupta identifies Aparā as union. Goddess worshippers, originally the Kaulas
the madhyamā speech (PaTrVi. 17: 13–14). (→ Tantrism), are thus divided into two branches:
Central to both Śākta philosophy and the phi- the Pūrva (early) Kaula, whose practitioners are
losophy of language is the concept of pratibhā. restrained in the symbolic application of forbid-
This term generates a wide range of applications, den elements, and the Uttara (later) Kaula, whose
from the spontaneous power inherent in the word yogins seek union with the Goddess by finding
principle to the Śākta appropriation as the God- identity of her manifestation in the feminine
dess. Besides applying this term in a purely lin- form.
guistic sense, Bhartṛhari also uses it to describe
yogic intuition or poetic ability, and the spontane-
ous manifestation of particular qualities in a spe- Bibliography
cific time. Creativity is at the core of all the
applications of pratibhā. The most immediate Avalon, A., Shakti and Shakta, New York, 1965, 1978.
mode of awareness, including the comprehension Dyczkowski, M.S.G., The Stanzas of Vibration: The
Spandakārikā with Four Commentaries, Albany, 1992.
of sentence meaning, is nondual in this depiction,
Furlinger, E., The Touch of Śakti: A Study in Non-dualistic
for awareness in this state is not separated into the Trika Śaivism of Kashmir, Delhi, 2009.
form of subject and object. In the Śākta depiction, Padoux, A., Vāc: The Concept of the Word in Selected Hindu
pratibhā stands for the autonomous power inher- Tantras, Albany, 1990.
ent in consciousness that gives rise to plurality, Pandey, K.C., Abhinavagupta: A Historical and Philosophi-
and this is identical to Pratibhā, the goddess. cal Study, Varanasi, 1963.
Finally, time as the power of the word principle Silburn, L., Kuṇḍalinī: Energy of the Depth, Albany, 1988.
Singh, J., Parātrīśikā Vivaraṇa: The Secret of Tantric Mysti-
as depicted by Bhartṛhari parallels the concept of
cism, Delhi, 2005.
Kālī, the mighty goddess, the expression of the Tigunait, R., Śakti: The Power in Tantra: A Scholarly
power of action and the embodiment of the Approach, Honesdale, 1998.
sequence of both cognitive and cosmic manifesta- White, D.G., The Kiss of the Yoginī: “Tantric Sex” and Its
tions. As the goddess devours time manifest in South Asian Contexts, Chicago, 2003.
sequence and thus is transcendent, she is synony-
Sthaneswar Timalsina
mous with vimarśa. The two powers of time

You might also like