LIST OF CASES

LAW OF EVIDENCE
Total—100 (after mid-sems till 291022)
Explained—29

Explained
1) 2. R v. Abdullah, 1885 ILR 7 All. 385—explained
2) 5. State of Maharashtra v. Praful B. Desai (Dr), (2003) 4 SCC 601 [Live Link]—
explained
3) 12. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer, (2014) 10 SCC 473—explained
4) 13. State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu, (2005) 11 SCC 600—explained
5) 16. Sheikh Akbar v. Sheikh Khan, (1881) ILR 7 Cal 256—explained
6) 20. State of Maharashtra v. Dnyaneshwar Laxman Rao Wankhede, (2009) 15 SCC 200
—explained
7) 28. Collector of Customs v. D. Bhoormall, (1974) 2 SCC 544—explained
8) 30. R v. Turner, [1975] Q.B. 834—explained
9) 31. Abrath v. The North Eastern Railway Company, [L.R.] 11 App. Cas. 247—
explained
10) 40. N. Bhuvaneshwar Rao v. Principal, Osmania Medical College, 1985 SCC OnLine
AP 196—explained
11) 42. Shri Krishnan v. Kurukshetra University, (1976) 1 SCC 311—explained
12) 46. Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P., (1979) 2 SCC 409—
explained
13) 47. Manuelsons Hotels (P) Ltd. v. State of Kerala, (2016) 6 SCC 766—explained
14) 49. 131022-PDS CASE-NFSA, 2013-Right to Food-ration cards-estoppel case—
explained (naku teliyadu)
15) 52. State of Karnataka v. K.K. Mohandas, (2007) 6 SCC 484—explained
16) 53. Satyendra Kumar v. Raj Nath Dubey, (2016) 14 SCC 49—explained
17) 54. Narain v. State of Punjab, 1959 Supp (1) SCR 724—explained
18) 62. Abdul Rajak Murtaja Dafedar v. State of Maharashtra, (1969) 2 SCC 234 [sniff
dog]—explained
19) 70. Thompson v. State, 199 Ind. 697 (1928)—explained
20) 71. Rattan Singh v. State of H.P., (1997) 4 SCC 161—explained
21) 76. Pratapsinh V. Ved v. State, 1955 SCC OnLine Guj 1—explained
22) 77. Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Bombay, 1958 SCR 161—explained
23) 82. Indian Airlines Corporation v. Madhuri Chowdhuri, 1964 SCC OnLine Cal 38—
explained
24) 84. Makin v. Attorney General, [1894] A.C. 57—explained
25) 87. Budhsen v. State of U.P., (1970) 2 SCC 128—explained
26) 93. Mirza Akbar v. King-Emperor, 1940 SCC OnLine PC 27—explained
27) 96. Jayendra Saraswathi Swamigal v. State of T.N., (2005) 2 SCC 13—explained
28) 97. Emperor v. Panchu Das and Goberdhone Singh, 1920 SCC OnLine Cal 24—
explained
29) 99. Gujja Lal v. Fatteh Lal, 1879 ILR 6 Cal 171—explained Ma’am section 13 of
evidences act
30) Sital das v. Sant Ram section 13 of evidences Act

ALL CASES
Oral Evidence
1. Soma Bhai v. State of Gujarat, (1975) 4 SCC 257—referred
2. R v. Abdullah, 1885 ILR 7 All. 385—explained
3. Subraya M.N. v. Vittala M.N. (2016) 8 SCC 705—referred
4. Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera, 1966 SCC OnLine US SC 112 [Miranda Rules]—referred
5. State of Maharashtra v. Praful B. Desai (Dr), (2003) 4 SCC 601 [Live Link]—explained
6. Sakshi v. Union of India, (2004) 5 SCC 518—referred
7. Amitabh Bagchi v. Ena Bagchi, 2004 SCC OnLine Cal 93—referred
8. J.J. Merchant (Dr) v. Shrinath Chaturvedi, (2002) 6 SCC 635 [Consumer-VC-Evi.]—referred

Electronic Evidence
(Though Arjun Panditrao is the law today, ma’am has only explained the initial cases of Navjot
Sabdhu and Anvar only if looked comparatively)
9. Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal, (2020) 3 SCC 216—referred
10. Shafhi Mohammad v. State of H.P., (2018) 2 SCC 801—referred
11. Tomaso Bruno v. State of U.P., (2015) 7 SCC 178—referred
12. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer, (2014) 10 SCC 473—explained
13. State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu, (2005) 11 SCC 600—explained
14. Ram Singh v. Col. Ram Singh, 1985 Supp SCC 611—referred

Sec. 91-100
15. Mangala Waman Karandikar v. Prakash Damodar Ranade, (2021) 6 SCC 139[91+92]—referred
16. Sheikh Akbar v. Sheikh Khan, (1881) ILR 7 Cal 256—explained
17. Subraya M.N. v. Vittala M.N., (2016) 8 SCC 705—ma’am said IMPORTANT
18. Karl v. Mississippi No. 2008-CP-00493-COA [How terms can be ambiguous]—referred
19. Riverisland Cold Storage, Inc. v. Fresno-Madera Production Credit Association, F068738 (Cal.
Ct. App. May. 11, 2015) [Parole Evidence Rule]—referred

Sec. 101
20. State of Maharashtra v. Dnyaneshwar Laxman Rao Wankhede, (2009) 15 SCC 200—
explained
21.Shivalingappa Kallayanappa v. State of Karnataka, 1994 Supp (3) SCC 235 [Sustained
Provocation]—referred

22. Woolmington v. The Director Of Public Prosecutions, [1935] A.C. 462 (insanity)
23. Mancini v. Director of Public Prosecutions, [1942] A.C. 1
24. The Director Of Public Prosecutions v. Morgan, [1975] 2 W.L.R. 913
25. The Director Of Public Prosecutions v. Beard, [1920] A.C. 479

Sec. 105-106
26. R v. M'Naughten, 1843 8 E.R. 718—referred
27. Dahyabhai Chhaganbhai Thakkar v. State of Gujarat, (1964) 7 SCR 361—referred
28. Collector of Customs v. D. Bhoormall, (1974) 2 SCC 544—explained
29. Bourhill v. Young, [1943] A.C. 92 (prudent man)—referred
30. R v. Turner, [1975] Q.B. 834—explained
Woolmington v. The Director Of Public Prosecutions, [1935] A.C. 462—referred again, not
counted
31. Abrath v. The North Eastern Railway Company, [L.R.] 11 App. Cas. 247—explained
32. Gajanan Dashrath Kharate v. State of Maharashtra, (2016) 4 SCC 604—referred
33. Tomaso Bruno v. State of U.P., (2015) 7 SCC 178—referred
34. R v. Tolson, (1889) 23 QBD 168—referred
35. Queen v. DS, (1884) 14 QBD 273—referred

Sec. 109
36. Harish Chander v. Ghisa Ram, (1981) 1 SCC 431 [Landlord]—referred (name of the case and
citation given by ma’am are different, please check once)
37. Hira Wazir v. M. Mohammad Ali Naqi, 1934 SCC OnLine Lah 603 [Principal Agent]—
referred

Sec. 110
38. Armory v. Delamirie [1722] EWHC KB J94 (31 July 1722)—referred

Sec. 111
39. Poosathurai v. Kannappa Chettiar, 1919 SCC OnLine PC 78—referred

Estoppel
Sec. 115-117
40. N. Bhuvaneshwar Rao v. Principal, Osmania Medical College, 1985 SCC OnLine AP 196
—explained
41. Sangeeta Shrivastava v. Prof. U.N. Singh, 1979 SCC OnLine Del 202—referred
42. Shri Krishnan v. Kurukshetra University, (1976) 1 SCC 311—explained
43. Rukmani Devi v. Prabhu Narayan, 2007 SCC OnLine Raj 472—referred
44. Pickard v. Sears, 112 E.R. 179—referred
45. Jethmal Himmatmal Jain v. State of Maharashtra, 1981 SCC OnLine Bom 54—referred
46. Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P., (1979) 2 SCC 409—explained
47. Manuelsons Hotels (P) Ltd. v. State of Kerala, (2016) 6 SCC 766—explained
48. State of Punjab v. Nestle India Ltd., (2004) 6 SCC 465—referred
49. 131022-PDS CASE-NFSA, 2013-Right to Food-ration cards-estoppel case—explained
(naku teliyadu)
50. Union of India v. Lt. Col. P.K. Choudhary, (2016) 4 SCC 236—referred
51. Food Corporation of India v. Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries, (1993) 1 SCC 71—referred
52. State of Karnataka v. K.K. Mohandas, (2007) 6 SCC 484—explained
53. Satyendra Kumar v. Raj Nath Dubey, (2016) 14 SCC 49—explained
54. Narain v. State of Punjab, 1959 Supp (1) SCR 724—explained
55. R.M. Malkani v. State of Maharashtra, (1973) 1 SCC 471—referred
56. LIC of India v. Anuradha, (2004) 10 SCC 131—referred
57. Phekan Singh v. Emperor, 1931 SCC OnLine Pat 24—referred
58. Kishan Lal v. Sohanlal, 1954 SCC OnLine Raj 47—referred
59. Shyam Singh v. D.I.G. of Police, 1964 SCC OnLine Raj 40—referred
60. Rameshchandra Ramchandra Golecha v. Dy. Registrar, 2015 SCC OnLine Bom 6870—
referred
61. Dharamveer v. State of U.P., (2010) 4 SCC 469—referred

Relevancy
62. Abdul Rajak Murtaja Dafedar v. State of Maharashtra, (1969) 2 SCC 234 [sniff dog]—
explained
63. Baba Narayan Lakras v. Saboosa, 1943 SCC OnLine PC 20—referred
64. Gade Lakshmi Mangaraju v. State of A.P., (2001) 6 SCC 205—referred
65. Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection (Investigation), (1974) 1 SCC 345—referred
66. V.C. Shukla v. State through CBI, 1980 Supp SCC 92—referred
67. Anwar Ali v. State of H.P., (2020) 10 SCC 166—referred
68. Ratten v. The Queen, [1972] A.C. 378—referred
69. Beddingfield v. Southern Railway Company, 1906 SCC OnLine US SC 121—referred
70. Thompson v. State, 199 Ind. 697 (1928)—explained
71. Rattan Singh v. State of H.P., (1997) 4 SCC 161—explained
72. R.K Malkani v. state
Pratap v. state
Hearsay
Section 6
72. Teper v. The Queen, [1952] A.C. 480—referred
73. Myers v. The Director Of Public Prosecutions, [1965] A.C. 1001—referred
Section 7
74. Wolf v. Wolf, 41 N.D. 109, 169 N.W. 577 (1918)—referred
75. England v. England, 51 N.W.2d 437 (1952)—referred
The Director Of Public Prosecutions v. Morgan, [1975] 2 W.L.R. 913—referred (already counted)
Section 8
76. Pratapsinh V. Ved v. State, 1955 SCC OnLine Guj 1—explained
77. Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Bombay, 1958 SCR 161—explained
78. Saju v. State of Kerala, (2001) 1 SCC 378—referred
79. R. Venkatkrishnan v. CBI, (2009) 11 SCC 737—referred
80. Pandurang v. State of Hyderabad, (1955) 1 SCR 1083—referred

Sec. 10
81. State of Punjab v. Sucha Singh, (2003) 3 SCC 153 [motive however strong, is a mere suspicion
only]—referred
Mirza Akbar v. Emperor

Jayendra saraswati swamigal v. state of TN

Doodnath pandey v. state

Emperor v. pancho das and Anr

Sec. 5, 7, 9, 35
82. Indian Airlines Corporation v. Madhuri Chowdhuri, 1964 SCC OnLine Cal 38—explained

Sec. 35
83. 261022-Erandrappa v. State of Karnataka-women jewellery identification (wrong case name,
please check)

Sec. 7, 8, 9
84. Makin v. Attorney General, [1894] A.C. 57—explained
85. Laxmi Raj Shetty v. State of T.N., (1988) 3 SCC 319—referred
86. Lekhraj v. State, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 9687—referred (didn’t have the entire case name
please check)

Sec. 9
87. Budhsen v. State of U.P., (1970) 2 SCC 128—explained
88. Rameshwar Singh v. State of J&K, (1971) 2 SCC 715—referred
89. Manu Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2010) 6 SCC 1—referred
90. Mulla v. State of U.P., (2010) 3 SCC 508 [delay]—referred
91. State of H.P. v. Lekh Raj, (2000) 1 SCC 247 [sperm]—referred
92. 261022-prosecutrix cannot be made an accomplice-State of Mahrashtra [incomplete case name,
please check]
Shankar Mahto v. state of Bihar
State of Maharashtra v. Suresh
93. Mirza Akbar v. King-Emperor, 1940 SCC OnLine PC 27—explained
94. Mogul v. Mcgregor, [L.R.] 21 Q.B.D. 544—referred
95. The Queen v. Latham, [2000] WASCA 57—referred
Sardul Singh Caveeshar v. State of Bombay, 1958 SCR 161—referred (already counted)
96. Jayendra Saraswathi Swamigal v. State of T.N., (2005) 2 SCC 13—explained
97. Emperor v. Panchu Das and Goberdhone Singh, 1920 SCC OnLine Cal 24—explained
98. Rangayyan v. Innasimuthu Mudali, 1955 SCC OnLine Mad 84—referred
99. `jja Lal v. Fatteh Lal, 1879 ILR 6 Cal 171—explained
100. Omychund v. Barker, 125 E.R. 1310—referred
SAHOO … Appellant; Versus STATE OF U.P. … Respondent
Appellants: Palvinder Kaur Vs. Respondent:The State of Punjab

Pakala Narayana Swami … Appellant; Versus King-Emperor … Respondent

Chikam kotteswar rao v. chikkam subbaro

Parole admission – Slattrie v. Poole- if the pleadings can be amended, order 6

rule 17 of C.P.C – Necessary Parties.

Net raj v. state of M.P – Burden of Proof – section 114