Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Direct Examination
Direct Examination
against Dr. Elliot Mancal, a neurologist, and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
alleging that the latter failed to diagnose him with ankylosing spondylitis and as a result
of such failure, Maresca continued to suffer from such disease and further progression
of such condition. Maresca produced expert report from Dr. Felder to that effect and the
Court ruled that his expert report is sufficient to bar the defendants’ motion for summary
judgment. However, on trial, such expert report was not admitted and not considered
by the jury. Defendants argued that Dr. Felder expert testimony failed to sufficiently
duty owed by the attending physician to the patient, a breach of such duty, that such
breach was the proximate cause of the injury suffered and the damages suffered by the
plaintiff were the direct result of such injury. Plaintiff is also required to present an expert
witness. The role of Dr. Felder as an expert witness in this case is to testify with
sufficient degree of medical certainty that there was a breach of standard of care and
such breach was the proximate cause of the injury suffered by Maresca.
The court granted judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendants for
failure of the expert witness to include in his testimony to any degree of medical
certainty that the defendants breached the standard of care or the cause of the harm
suffered by Maresca. On appeal, the Court of appeals affirmed such judgment finding
that the expert’s failure to sufficiently establish the breach of standard of care and such
is the proximate cause of the injury. Supreme Court issued an order denying a
Joseph Maresca v. Elliot Mancall, M.D. and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital.
http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/03D0242P.pdf
Joseph Maresca v. Elliot Mancall, M.D. and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital.
http://vls.law.villanova.edu/locator/3d/June2005/043103np.pdf