Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Constitutional basis
• Article 14, Section 13, 1987 Constitution
o “The State shall protect and secure the exclusive rights of scientists, inventors,
artists and other gifted citizens to their intellectual property and creations,
particularly when beneficial to the people, for such period as may be provided by
law.”
▪ Purpose: to encourage more scientists, inventors and artists to produce
more inventions or artistic works in order to benefit the people
Patents
Primary Purpose of Patent system is not to reward the individual for his invention but for the
advancement of arts and sciences. Since inventions benefit the public, so in order to encourage
the inventors to disclose their inventions or their useful knowledge. Basically, to encourage
information dissemination of information concerning these patents.
Patentable inventions
• Any technical solution of a problem in any field of human activity which is new, involves
an inventive step and is industrially applicable. It may be, or may relate to, a product, or
process, or an improvement of any of the foregoing. (Sec. 21, IPC)
General Rule: When a work has already been made available to the public, it
shall be non-patentable for absence of novelty
3. Industrially applicable – an invention that can be produced and used in any industry. This
means an invention is not merely theoretical, but also has a practical purpose
Non-patentable inventions
1. Plant varieties or animal breeds or essentially biological process for the production of
plants or animals. This provision shall not apply to micro-organisms and non-biological
and microbiological processes;
2. Aesthetic creations;
3. Discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods;
4. Schemes, rules and methods of performing mental acts, playing games or doing
business, and programs for computers;
5. Anything which is contrary to public order or morality (IPC as amended by R.A. 9502,
Sec. 22);
6. Methods for treatment of the human or animal body; and
7. In the case of drugs and medicines, mere discovery of a new form or new property of a
known substance which does not result in the enhancement of the efficacy of that
substance
Ownership of Patents
Section 28. Right to a Patent. – The right to a patent belongs to the inventor, his heirs or assigns.
When two (2) or more persons have jointly made an invention, the right to a patent shall belong
to them jointly.
First-to-File Rule
• If two (2) or more persons have made the invention separately and independently of
each other, the right to the patent shall belong to the person who filed an application for
such invention, or
• Where two or more applications are filed for the same invention, to the applicant which
has the earliest filing date (IPC, Sec. 29)
Inventions created pursuant to a commission:
Pursuant to a commission: The person who commissions the work shall own the patent, unless
otherwise provided in the contract.
Pursuant to employment: In case the employee made the invention in the course of his
employment contract, the patent shall belong to:
a. The employee, if the inventive activity is not a part of his regular duties even if
the employee uses the time, facilities and materials of the employer;
b. The employer, if the inventive activity is the result of the performance of his
regularly-assigned duties, unless there is an agreement, express or implied, to
the contrary (IPC, Sec. 30)
Right of priority
An application for patent filed by any person who has previously applied for the same invention
in another country which by treaty, convention, or law afford similar privileges to Filipino citizens,
shall be considered as filed as of the date of filing the foreign application: Provided, That: (a) the
local application expressly claims priority; (b) it is filed within twelve (12) months from the date
the earliest foreign application was filed; and (c) a certified copy of the foreign application
together with an English translation is filed within six (6) months from the date of filing in the
Philippines.
Patent registration
The procedure for the grant of patent may be summarized as follows:
1. Filing of the application
2. Accordance of the filing date
3. Formality examination
4. Classification and search
5. Publication of application
6. Substantive examination
7. Grant of patent
8. Publication upon grant
9. Issuance of certificate
Patent application
Section 32. The application. – 32.1. The patent application shall be in Filipino or English and shall
contain the following:
a. A request for the grant of a patent;
b. A description of the invention;
c. Drawings or necessary for the understanding of the invention;
d. One or more claims; and
e. An abstract
Grounds for cancellation of patent
Any interested party may petition to cancel any patent or any claim or parts of a claim under any
of the following grounds:
1. The invention is not new or patentable;
2. The patent does not disclose the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for
it to be carried out by any person skilled in the art; or
3. Contrary to public order or morality (IPC, Sec. 61.1);
4. Patent is found invalid in an action for infringement (IPC, Sec. 82); and
5. The patent included matters outside the scope of the disclosure contained in the
application
The rights conferred by a patent application take effect after publication in the Official Gazette.
(IPC, Sec. 46)
a. Using a patented product after it has been put on the market in the Philippines by the
owner of the product, or with his express consent.
i. In case of drugs or medicines, the said limitation applies after a drug or medicine
has been introduced in the Philippines or anywhere else in the world by the patent
owner, or by any party authorized to use the invention. This allows parallel
importation for drugs and medicines.
ii. The right to import the drugs and medicines shall be available to any government
agency or any private third party (IPC, Sec. 72.1, as amended by R.A. No. 9502)
b. Where the act is done privately and on a non-commercial scale or for a non-commercial
purpose (IPC, Sec. 72.2)
c. Exclusively for experimental use of the invention for scientific purposes or educational
purposes (IPC, Sec. 72.3)
d. In the case of drugs and medicines, where the act included testing, using, making, or
selling the invention including any data related thereto, solely for purposes reasonably
related to the development and submission of information and issuance of approvals by
government regulatory agencies required under any law of the Philippines or of another
country that regulates the manufacture, construction, use or sale of any product.
Other Limitations
Prior user
• Person other than the applicant, who in good faith, started using the invention in the
Philippines, or undertaken serious preparations to use the same, before filing date or
priority date of the application shall have the right to continue the use thereof, but this
right shall only be transferred or assigned further with this enterprise or business (IPC,
Sec. 73)
74.1 A government agency or third person authorized by the Government may exploit the
invention even without agreement of the patent owner where:
a. The public interest, in particular, national security, nutrition, health or the development
of other sectors, as determined by the appropriate agency of the government, so requires;
or
b. A judicial or administrative body has determined that the manner of exploitation, by the
owner of the patent or his licensee is anti-competitive; or
c. IN the case of drugs and medicines, there is a national emergency or other circumstance
of extreme urgency requiring the use of the invention; or
d. In the case of drugs and medicines, there is public non-commercial use of the patent by
the patentee, without satisfactory reason; or
e. In the case of drugs and medicines, the demand for the patented article in the Philippines
is not being met to an adequate extent and on reasonable terms, as determined by the
Secretary of the Department of Health.
Doctrine of Exhaustion
• Also known as the doctrine of first sale, it provides that the patent holder has control of
the first sale of his invention. He has the opportunity to receive the full consideration for
his invention from his sale. Hence, he exhausts his rights in the future control of his
invention.
Patent Infringement
• The MAKING, USING, OFFERING FOR SALE, SELLING, or IMPORTING a patented product or
a product obtained directly or indirectly from a patented process, or the USE of a patented
process without the authorization of the patentee. (Sec. 76)
Visible sign
• Words
• Letters
• Numerals
• Figures/Pictures
• Shapes
• Colors
• Logos
• Three dimensional
• Objects
• Combinations
Not visible
• Scents
• Sounds
Distinctiveness of a mark
Trademarks are divided into five different categories, which are ranked by distinctiveness
• Fanciful trademarks – made-up words which are invented to be used as a trademark name
• Arbitrary trademarks – words that have a real, common meaning but they are completely
unrelated to the product or service
• Suggestive trademarks – named after a characteristic of the product or service
• Descriptive trademarks – description of the product or service
• Generic trademarks – cannot be protected as they are simply a generic description of the
product or service
Collective mark
• Mark or trade-name used by the members of a cooperative, an association or other
collective group or organization (ex. Halal certification)
Registration
• Prior use is not a requirement but there must be actual use after application
• Declaration of Actual Use – within 3 years from filing of the application
Non-registrable Marks
• Immoral, deceptive or scandalous matters
• Matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, etc.
• Contrary to public order or morality
• Flags/coat of arms of nations
• Names, portraits or signature of living persons (Exception: with consent)
• Names, portraits or signature of a deceased President of the Philippines (Exception:
written consent of living widow
• Identical with a registered mark belonging to a different proprietor or a mark with an
earlier filing or priority date, in respect of:
o The same goods or services, or
o Closely related goods or services, or
o If it nearly resembles such a mark as to be likely to deceive or cause confusion
(FIRST-TO-FILE RULE)
• Misleading marks
• Generic terms (signs or indications that have become customary or usual to designate the
goods or services in everyday language or in bona fide and established trade practice
• Descriptive terms (signs or indications that may serve in trade to designate the kind,
quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin, time or production of the
goods or rendering of the services, or other characteristics of the goods or services
• Color alone
• Shapes dictated by technical factors
Territoriality Principle: Trademark registration abroad shall not be valid and binding here in the
Philippines
Exception: Well-known marks, bad faith
Trademark Infringement
• Use without consent of the trademark owner of any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or
colorable limitation of any registered mark or trade name. Such use is likely to cause
confusion or mistake or to deceive purchasers or others as to the source or origin of such
goods or services, or identity of such business
Elements:
1. Ownership of a trademark through registration
2. That the trademark is reproduced, counterfeited, copied or colourably imitated by
another
3. No consent by the trademark owner or assignee
4. Use in connection with the sale, offering for sale, or advertising of any such goods,
business or services or those related thereto
5. Likelihood of Confusion
Colorable Imitation
• Such a close or ingenious imitation as to be calculated to deceive ordinary purchasers, or
such resemblance of the infringing mark to the original as to deceive an ordinary
purchaser giving such attention as a purchaser usually gives, and to cause him to purchase
the one supposing it to be the other
Likelihood of confusion
Types of confusion
• Confusion of goods – as to the goods themselves
• Confusion of business – as to the source or origin of such goods
- Wherein the goods of the parties are different, but the defendant’s product can
reasonably be assumed to originate from the plaintiff thereby deceiving the public into
believing that there is some connection between the plaintiff and defendant, which in
fact, does not exit.
Test of Confusion
• Dominancy Test – Focuses on the prevalent features of the competing marks
Ex. Papa Ketsarap vs. Papa Boy Lechon Sauce
• Totality Test – determined on the basis of visual, aural, connotative comparisons and
overall impressions engendered by the marks in controversy as they are encountered in
the marketplace
Ex. Lee vs. Stylistic Mr. Lee
Other Factors
Idem Sonans Rule – aural effects of the words and letters contained in the marks are also
considered in determining the issue of confusing similarity
Ex.
1. “Pycogenor” vs. PCO-GENOL” (Prosource vs. Horphag)
2. “Dermaline” vs. “Dermalin” (Dermaline Inc. vs. Myra Pharmaceuticals)
3. “Nanny” vs. “Nan” (Nestle S.A. vs. Dy Jr.)
Unfair Competition
• It is the passing off or attempting to pass off upon the public of the goods or business of
one person as the goods or business of another with the end and probable effect of
deceiving the public.
Trademark Infringement Unfair Competition
Unauthorized use of a trademark The passing off of one’s goods as those of
another
Fraudulent intent is unnecessary Fraudulent intent is essential
GR: Prior registration of the trademark is a Registration is not necessary
prerequisite to the action
Exception: Well-known marks
COPYRIGHT
• A right over literary and artistic works which are original intellectual creations in the
literary and artistic domain protected from the moment of creation
Copyrightable works
• Literary and Artistic works
o Books, pamphlets, articles and other writings
o Lectures, sermons, addresses, dissertations prepared for oral delivery, whether or
not reduced in writing or other material form
o Letters (shall belong to the writer)
o Dramatic, choreographic works
o Musical compositions
o Works of art
o Periodicals and newspapers
o Works relative to Geography, Topography, architecture or science
o Works of applied art
o Works of a Scientific or Technical character
o Photographic works
o Audiovisual works and cinematographic works
o Pictorial illustrations and advertisements
o Computer programs; and
o Other literary scholarly, scientific and artistic works (IPC, Sec. 172.1)
• Derivative works
o Dramatizations, translations, adaptations, abridgements, arrangements, and other
alterations of literary or artistic works;
o Collections of literary, scholarly, or artistic works and compilations of data and
other materials which are original by reason of the selection or coordination or
arrangement of their contents (IPC, sec. 173)
Non-Copyrightable works
• Idea, procedure, system, method of operation, concept, principle, discovery or mere data
as such
• News of the day and other items of press information
• Any official text of a legislative, administrative, or legal nature, as well as any official
translation thereof
• Pleadings
• Decisions of courts and tribunals – this refers to original decisions and not to annotated
decisions such as the SCRA or SCAD as these already fall under the classification of
derivative works, hence copyrightable
• Any work of the government of the Philippines
• TV programs, format of TV programs
• Systems of bookkeeping; and
• Statutes
2. Moral rights – For reasons of professionalism and propriety, the author has the right:
a. To require that the authorship of the works be attributed tom him (attribution
right/paternity right)
b. To make any alterations of his work prior to, or to withhold it from publication
c. To preserve integrity of work, object to any distortion, mutilation or other
modification which would be prejudicial to his honor or reputation; and
d. To restrain the use of his name with respect to any work not of his own creation
or in a distorted version of his work (right against false attribution) (IPC, Sec. 193)
Expiration of Copyright
• Transfers to public domain
Ownership of Copyright
Copyright Infringement
Elements
• Ownership of a valid copyright
o Proof of ownership: Sec. 218 – Affidavit Evidence
o Exercise of an of the exclusive economic rights in Sec. 177 without the consent of
the copyright owner
o UNLESS: Fair use
Fair use exception
• Fair use for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching including limited (multiple)
number of copies for classroom use, scholarship, research and similar purposes (Sec. 185)