Professional Documents
Culture Documents
F
rans Vera’s book, Grazing Ecology and duced. However, if the landscape was not very
Forest History, published in English in open, how might the current abundance and
2000, has generated considerable debate diversity of species that depend on open habitats
and not a little controversy. Whether one agrees be explained? Chris Thomas looks at whether
with his views on the role of wild grazing in shap- our open-ground species must also have been
ing pre-Neolithic European landscapes, or its abundant in the past or whether some could have
potential to generate wildlife-rich countryside in invaded and spread from the Continent after post-
the future, there can be no doubt that his book Neolithic clearances.
stimulated a re-evaluation of what we can really The next three articles consider the role of large
tell from palyo-ecological work (principally pollen herbivores in present and future landscapes. Frans
analysis, but increasingly interpretation of sub- Vera challenges the assumption that we need to
fossil insect assemblages). It chimed with discus- manage wildlife through his account of Oostvaard-
sions about how we ‘do’ conservation, particularly ersplassen (rapidly becoming a place of pilgrim-
in Britain: is the emphasis of management for age for British nature conservation workers). He
specific habitat or species targets always what we cautions against the idea that because wildlife has
should be doing? Is there a place for wilderness existed alongside farming in the past, this is neces-
and natural processes? His book was published at sarily the way it must be in future. Kathy Hodder
a time of increasing interest in wood-pastures and and James Bullock explore what naturalistic graz-
veteran trees – for which his ‘half-open landscape’ ing might mean in British conditions. Could it fit
suggested a natural analogue. However, his ideas with current approaches to nature conservation?
and arguments have not gone unchallenged. Eric Bignal and Davy McCracken, however, stress
What we have aimed to do in this special issue the importance of maintaining extensive, low-
of British Wildlife is to bring together the essen- intensity grazing systems across Europe because
tial points of Vera’s hypothesis and some of the of their associated wildlife. They see re-wilding as
evidence that has been raised in challenge, at least not an option for most of Europe.
so far as conditions in Britain, past, present and Peter Taylor stands apart from the bureau-
future, are concerned. We believe that this will cratic issues to champion the case for wild places
help to set the framework for future discussions and wild animals (including large herbivores) to
on this topic. provide the spirit of wildness. Gareth Browning
Kathy Hodder and colleagues set out the argu- and Rachel Yanik bring us back to the reality of
ments presented in Vera’s book and the main what can be done in a real place – Ennerdale, in
objections that have been raised against them the Lake District. Finally, Keith Kirby outlines
with respect to the pre-Neolithic landscape. How some of the policy challenges that need to be
likely is it that a ‘half-open landscape’ driven by addressed to allow a wilder approach to grazing
large herbivores was dominant across even the for conservation in Britain.
lowlands of Britain? David Bullock expands on We hope that you are stimulated by the ideas
the interactions between our past mammal fauna contained in these papers.
and the landscape, highlighting insights arising
from places such as the Yellowstone National Stream near Pinnick Wood,
Park, where large carnivores have been re-intro- New Forest, Hampshire. Andrew Branson
P
alaeoecologists have been encouraging us to attempts to understand them, so the vast temporal
think about the relevance of the Holocene perspective provided by palaeoecological studies
fossil record for nature conservation for can provide important guidance for nature conser-
many years (e.g. Buckland 1993) but this informa- vation (Willis & Birks 2006).
tion seems slow to filter through to the conserva- However, accurate vegetation mapping is diffi-
tion community. Indeed, Willis et al. (2005) report cult enough in modern landscapes (Cherrill &
that recently published biodiversity reports and McLean 1999), so the challenge of describing
policy documents rarely look back more than prehistoric environments is immeasurably greater.
50 years and may ignore the historical context Nevertheless, pioneering work in the mid 20th
entirely. This has been a lost opportunity for century showed that pollen and spores extracted
understanding ecological systems. Many natural from peat bogs were so perfectly preserved that
processes occur over timescales that confound our they could be used to demonstrate sequences
of vegetation change since the last glaciation central and western Europe, with the assump-
(Godwin 1956). Since then, the science has tion that this period represents an almost pristine
burgeoned: ancient deposits of beetles, snails, or ‘natural’ state which should provide a suitable
fungal spores and plant macrofossils add to the conservation benchmark. Vera contends (i) that
picture, as does the chemistry of ancient lake sedi- this landscape was not closed woodland but a rela-
ments (Bell & Walker 2004). tively open park-like mosaic of wood and grass-
Many questions still remain to be answered land, and (ii) that large wild herbivores were an
by this fascinating research and one aspect has essential driving force behind woodland-grassland
received considerable attention in the last decade. vegetation cycles. The advocacy in his argument
This concerns the nature of the ‘primeval’ land- and the timing of the publication, when grazing
scapes, in other words our understanding of natu- was seen as increasingly important in conserva-
ral systems prior to significant human impact. The tion in Europe, have combined to raise the profile
debate was kindled by a thesis by the Dutch forest of this issue. If Vera is correct, the open park-like
ecologist Frans Vera in 2000 (see also Vera & landscapes were inherited rather than created by
Buissink 2007). Vera effectively challenged estab- people; this may have implications for conserva-
lished views about the primeval landscapes and tion practice in Europe.
argued that the refutation, and the resulting alter- The adoption of Vera’s ideas into conservation
native landscape models, had critical importance management plans in the UK (see Box 1) gives an
for modern conservation practice. indication of the influence that this work has had.
Vera’s thesis is focused on the pre-Neolithic Indeed, Vera’s ideas have been described as a ‘chal-
(ca 8000-5000BP) landscape in the lowlands of lenge to orthodox thinking’ (Miller 2002) and
A glade in Bramshaw Wood in the New Forest, with ancient Beech pollards forming the canopy. Some might
describe this view as classic ‘high forest’ with a closed canopy, but compared to many modern managed
woodlands it also has a ‘half open’ aspect. Andrew Branson
Was the pre-Neolithic landscape a relatively Also, in large parts of Britain, the absence of
open park-like mosaic? some shade-tolerant species such as Hornbeam
Regeneration failure of oaks and Hazel in Carpinus betulus and Beech during the mid-
modern forests Holocene (Huntley & Birks 1983) may have
Vera’s (2000) key argument lies in the well-known provided a wider potential niche for oaks than
paucity of regeneration of oaks Quercus and would have been found on the Continent.
Hazel Corylus avellana under unmanaged forest Lastly, the presence of Hazel pollen in the fossil
canopies. Vera argues that if the mid-Holocene record does not necessarily indicate large canopy
landscape consisted mainly of such closed-canopy gaps. Although very open conditions are gener-
forest, these species should not be so well repre- ally necessary for full flowering of Hazel, substan-
sented in the fossil record. He concludes that tial flowering, and so pollen production, can be
oaks and Hazel thrived in the primeval landscape frequent in very small gaps (K J Kirby unpublished
because there were large open areas for regenera- data, in Hodder & Bullock 2005a).
tion and because grazing animals reduced compe- So, although the poor regeneration of the light-
tition from more shade-tolerant species such as demanding trees and shrubs in modern forests is
Beech Fagus sylvatica. cited as a major issue for the closed-forest hypoth-
What may be underplayed is the influence of esis (Bradshaw 2002), there are explanations that
soil conditions and topography on the shade-intol- do not require a half-open landscape or a major
erance that often prevents oaks from developing role for large herbivores.
from seedlings to larger trees. In some situations
oaks may be able to maintain themselves even Can the study of fossil pollen detect
where more shade-tolerant species are present vegetation openness and thorny scrub?
(Mitchell & Cole 1998). On acid sandy soils, oaks Vera (2000) questions the potential for palynol-
were able to regenerate successfully within gaps ogy to detect vegetation openness. Although it is
in pine stands (Mosandl & Kleinert 1998; Paluch accepted that models available in 1999 gave only
& Bartkowicz 2004). Oak competes well on very a rough approximation of openness, and require
acid, nutrient-poor soils and in regions subject to improved testing (Sugita et al. 1999), the case
summer drought, while Hazel can survive on steep against palynological insights may be overstated
slopes and floodplains (Coppins et al. 2002; Sven- by Vera’s reliance on early references. Many of
ning 2002). the methodological weaknesses critiqued in Vera’s
thesis have largely been solved in more recent What do other fossil and subfossil records tell
work (Mitchell 2001) and small-scale openness us about landscape openness?
in some landscapes can now be recognised (Fyfe Non-pollen evidence has been used less frequently
2007). for interpreting past landscapes, but a combina-
For instance, studies of small hollows are tion of data sources may be used to add confidence
excluded, yet these are far more sensitive to open- to landscape models. Non-tree pollen records from
forest conditions because they tend to be domi- interglacial sites correlate well with vegetation
nated by local pollen rain, as opposed to data from openness estimated from beetle, mollusc and/or
lakes and bogs, which may collect pollen from plant macrofossils (Svenning 2002). In Svenning’s
tens of kilometres away (Bradshaw et al. 2003). review the various information sources pointed
Estimates of the source area for small-hollow sites to predominant forest in the pre-agricultural
vary from 20-30m (Bradshaw 1981; Mitchell Holocene of north-west Europe, with some open
1988) to 50-100m (Sugita 1994), and observa- vegetation on floodplains, on some calcareous or
tions from such sites tend to indicate a closed pre- poor sandy soils and in the continental interior.
Neolithic forest (Bradshaw 2002; Mitchell 2001, Whitehouse & Smith (2004) criticise Svenning’s
2005). Any further debate on past forest openness interpretation of the fossil beetle data, but in a
should also be informed by the recent advances review of data from two English Holocene sites,
in pollen mapping and data model comparisons their conclusions are not radically different from
for vegetation dynamics and climatic change (e.g. Svenning’s. They reported open woodland, but
Bradshaw 2008). little sign of grazing animals, on a calcareous site
Vera (2000) also seeks to explain why the open- in southern England, and primary forest, includ-
ground plants, such as grasses, and thorny scrub, ing a large proportion of old trees and dead wood,
which his thesis suggests should be very common, with few open taxa/dung beetles on a floodplain in
are rare in the pollen records. Obstruction the English Midlands.
provided by woodland-edge vegetation would Buckland (2005) has reviewed the fossil-insect
minimise pollen dispersal from open grassy areas evidence for Britain in more detail in relation to
in forests to mires. This argument is, however, Vera’s ideas, utilising the BUGS Coleopteran Ecol-
valid only if either woody vegetation grew pref- ogy Package of fossil record, habitat and distri-
erentially around mire edges or the proportion of bution (Buckland & Buckland 2002, 2006). He
woody vegetation in the landscape was high. concludes that, as in previous interglacials, species
It is also suggested that grass pollen deposits associated with dead wood were very frequent in
may have been uncommon in wood-pasture land- the early to mid Holocene, but declined, often to
scapes because of heavy grazing of the flowering regional extinction, from the Neolithic onwards.
heads. However, grass pollen can be well repre- Species associated with grassland and other
sented in palynological records; for instance, the components of ‘open habitats’ occurred but were
European pollen record clearly shows increased rare in the mid-Holocene, suggesting that there
proportions of grasses and herbaceous species were open areas but that such habitats formed a
with increasing evidence of Neolithic human limited part of the overall landscape. However,
activity, and grazing undoubtedly occurred during open-habitat species do become more common at
this period. the time that Neolithic humans are likely to have
The contention in Vera’s thesis that hawthorns opened up the landscape, and an apparently rapid
Crataegus and Blackthorn Prunus spinosa are diversification of dung-beetle faunas during the
‘entirely or almost entirely invisible’ to palynology Neolithic suggests an increase in their food supply.
also needs consideration. Insect-pollinated shrubs As Britain was an island from about 7500BP
making up the marginal vegetation of open spaces (Preece 1995), it seems probable that much of this
in forest are proportionately poorly represented in beetle fauna was already in residence. This would
pollen diagrams (Godwin 1956), but pollen from suggest that prior to the Neolithic clearances, wild
such scrubby species is recorded from floodplain herbivores were widespread but rare. Buckland
sites in the previous interglacial (the Ipswichian) (2005) also noted the occurrence of pyrophilic
(Svenning 2002), demonstrating that it is certainly (fire-loving) species in the pre-Neolithic land-
visible in ancient records. scape, which indicates that fire, either natural or
anthropogenic, is likely to have been a significant but most historical descriptions cite woodland
factor in creating and maintaining open condi- or ‘bushy plains’ as the primary habitat for this
tions. species. Many ‘woodland’ bird species have differ-
Macrofossils from trees may also be used to help ent patterns of habitat use in Britain and mainland
understand the nature of past forests, although Europe, and changes in habitat use have occurred
there is inevitable difficulty in interpretation of over time (Fuller 1995).
the small samples of these records. The park-like In Britain, species that depended on continu-
landscape postulated by Vera (2000) would be ous closed forest would be expected to have
expected to include open-grown trees with low, declined in the last 5,000 years because wood-
spreading branches. However, tree remains from land cover was reduced to about 5% by 1900,
lowland bogs and fens generally have the charac- whereas conditions for species of open ground
teristics of having grown in closed-canopy condi- have generally increased (Kirby 2003), and this
tions: straight trunks, narrow girth and lack of is abundantly clear from the fossil insect record
low branches (Rackham 2003). (www.Bugs2000.org). Open-ground species may
previously have been restricted to small ‘refuges’
Can the abundance of modern open- such as cliff-tops during the pre-Neolithic period
ground assemblages inform us about the and then spread to the rest of Britain. Given
pre-Neolithic environment? continuous openness in marginal habitats, disper-
The abundance of species associated with open sal would need to happen only occasionally for
conditions in modern landscapes in Britain has species’ survival (Marks 1983).
been put forward as evidence that the prime- Arguments against spread from refugia, based
val landscape must also have been open. For on the poor dispersal of old-growth species under
instance, Rose (2002) stresses the diversity of current conditions (Alexander 2004), may under-
vascular plants, epiphytic bryophytes and lichens estimate the significance of chance rare events
and butterflies found among woodland edges and the role of large herbivores in long-distance
and clearings, and Miller (2002) points out that dispersal (Schmidt et al. 2004; Eycott et al. 2004).
birds, such as the Corncrake Crex crex must have It is also easy to under-estimate the scale of past
evolved to need grassland before human clear- movement of flora and fauna in ships’ ballast
ances for agriculture. (Buckland et al. 1995; Lindroth 1957), or even
However, there is a logical flaw and a risk in on human feet (Wichmann et al. 2009). This may
extrapolating from where species occur today. well have influenced species’ dispersal during the
In modern Swedish landscapes many saproxylic Neolithic migration.
species associated with dead wood are more abun-
dant when old trees are open-grown (Rannius & Were large wild herbivores an essential
Jannson 2000). However, most sites where old driving force behind woodland-grassland
trees grow at present are former wood-pastures, vegetation cycles?
i.e. the trees grew in open conditions. Equivalent Cyclic succession and resulting mosaic patterns of
populations of invertebrates from 400-year-old vegetation have been observed for many decades
trees that grew in closed forest can be compared and were given systematic treatment in a seminal
only by use of the fossil record, because such paper by Watt (1947). The major contribution of
stands no longer exist. Frans Vera and colleagues is to assert that large
Also, limited understanding of the distribution, herbivores, such as the Aurochs, would have been
dispersal abilities and population characteristics key drivers of such cyclic processes at the land-
of many species/organisms confound interpre- scape scale, involving transitions between wood-
tations of landscape history. Motzkin & Foster land and grassland (Olff et al. 1999). There are
(2002) note that in North America many butterfly three stages in the cyclical turnover of vegetation
and moth species thought to be grassland-indica- that they propose: (i) grassland with patches of
tors may also be common in woodland. The Heath unpalatable scrub where tree seedlings can estab-
Hen Tympancuchus cupido cupido has been used lish and grow because they are protected from
to document former abundance of grasslands and grazing; (ii) groves of trees which eventually shade
other open habitats in eastern North America, out the scrub, and harbour large ungulates which
What role did the large herbivores of the Mid-Holocene play in wooded landscapes? John Davis
prevent regeneration; (iii) a break-up phase where herbivores was food supply, and that, if current
trees in the centre of the grove decay, allowing landscapes (such as the Scottish Highlands) can
light to enter, and grasses and herbs to establish – be kept open by grazing, so might have those in
leading back to the first stage. prehistory. It may be that the role of large herbiv-
Olff et al. (1999) have elaborated the mecha- ores has been under-emphasised in forest ecology.
nism by which such vegetation cycling could For instance, it is known that deer can maintain
occur, and different elements of the process can be small-scale grassy glades in British upland forests
seen at many sites, for example in the New Forest (Peterken 1996) and Elk Alces alces appear to
in southern England (Bakker et al. 2004). The prevent woodland succession in fenland sedge-
question is not, therefore, whether such a regen- communities in Poland (Svenning 2002). Rooting
eration cycle could have occurred, but whether it by Wild Boar Sus scrofa provides suitable places
was the dominant mechanism for landscape regen- for trees and shrubs to become established, but
eration and what temporal and spatial patterns it equally damage to roots and bark may lead to
might have produced. the demise of trees through subsequent disease.
The mechanism does, of course, assume the One problem is that this ignores possible impacts
presence of large herbivores in sufficient numbers of predators. Vera (2000) simply assumes that
to undertake this dominant role. The likelihood ‘Whatever the influence the large predators had,
of this is difficult to address due to the paucity of the densities [of large herbivores] that are required
good bone assemblages from the early to middle for the regeneration of oaks and Hazel must have
Holocene. This lack of evidence limits direct been the result.’ which illustrates the level of spec-
conclusions about the diversity and particularly ulation affecting this debate.
the abundance of the large-herbivore fauna and In recent years there have been fascinat-
its predators (Bradshaw & Hannon 2004; Vera ing insights into predator effects on the land-
2000; Yalden 1999). scape, which should at least warn us to beware
This leaves circumstantial evidence that can be of assumptions about past environments based
surmised by comparison with modern populations on limited data. For instance, the interactions
of large herbivores. This is emphasised by Fenton between vegetation structure, predator hunting
(2004), who argues that the main limitation on behaviour and herbivore response to predation
risk are complex (White et al. 2003; Laundré et ant competitors some grazing may be required for
al. 2001; Hebblewhite et al. 2002). Ecologists in them to become well establised.
Yellowstone National Park were able to demon- While we know that large herbivores can influ-
strate how the reintroduction of Wolves to over- ence forest structure, there are huge areas of uncer-
grazed forest generated a ‘landscape of fear’ by tainty and speculation about wild populations of
modifying the behaviour of grazing animals. At these animals in prehistoric times. Whether their
sites of high predation risk (e.g. low visibility behaviour or abundance, both of which are diffi-
or escape barriers), the riparian vegetation was cult to reconstruct, could have enabled them to be
released from browsing by Red Deer Cervus elap- the dominant driver of landscape composition in
hus, whereas at low-risk sites (open areas) riparian pre-Neolithic Europe remains open to debate.
vegetation was still suppressed (Ripple & Beschta
2003). Lynx Lynx lynx are also reported to have a Does evidence from literary sources inform us
significant impact on the distribution and behav- about the primeval landscape?
iour of Roe Deer Capreolus capreolus in Switzer- Early writings provide information about forest
land, which could similarly lead to reduced deer cover and wilderness and so give clues as to the
impact on vegetation (Hetherington 2006). ancient landscape. In terms of modern conserva-
We also need to improve our understand- tion decisions, it is therefore important to know
ing of the extirpated herbivores before coming what the medieval concept of wilderness entailed
to firm conclusions. The Aurochs may not have and whether it can be related to the pre-Neolithic
required large open areas in the landscape (Van landscape. Vera uses historical texts to argue that
Vuure 2005). In fact, isotope research on Auroch words such as ‘silva’, ‘Forst’, ‘forest’, ‘Wald’,
bones indicates that these bovids had an essen- ‘wold’, ‘weald’, ‘woud’ and ‘wood’ in classical and
tially woodland diet (Noe-Nygaard et al. 2005). It medieval texts did not necessarily indicate closed
remains to be seen whether further research with forest, and hence ‘medieval’ wilderness areas were
samples from a range of sites support these results. relatively open. He assumes that these wildern-
To apply Vera’s thesis specifically to British esses may reflect the condition of the pre-Neolithic
conditions, we need to allow for a reduced suite landscape.
of large herbivores compared with that on the Van Vuure (2005) argues against Vera’s sugges-
Continent. There is a very long gap in the British tion that the Latin ‘silva’ refers to a ‘mosaic of
fossil record for ‘horse’ between the Mesolithic groves and grassland’, and he considers that closed
and the early Neolithic, and there is no convincing forest is more consistent with the descriptions of
evidence for Elk after the Early Holocene, despite German forests in classical accounts, although
the one late date from the Cree River in Scot- these texts themselves are not without bias. The
land (Kitchener et al. 2004). The European Bison ‘Great Wilderness’ in East Prussia in the medieval
Bison bonasus did not return to Britain during period, described as ‘wald’, was an area of exten-
the present interglacial (Yalden 1999, 2003). sive and closed forest, interspersed by marshes,
Large herbivores were even more restricted in despite retaining populations of Wild Horse,
Ireland, where Aurochs were absent and Red Deer European Bison and Aurochs (Van Vuure 2005).
scarce or absent. Bradshaw & Hannon (2004) Vera (2000) interprets Eichwald’s 1830s map
and Mitchell (2005) have therefore compared of the Bialowieza Forest in Poland as showing
the pollen profiles from Ireland with those from that it was composed of groves interspersed with
Britain and the Continent. They conclude that open grassland areas. Van Vuure produces a near-
the presence or absence of large herbivores does contemporary map (1826) which, while appearing
not significantly alter the vegetation patterns, and also to show relatively open conditions, is accom-
that large herbivores were therefore not the major panied by a written description that emphasises
factor driving forest composition. Erik Buchwald the closed nature of the forest. He concludes that
(pers. comm.) has, however, pointed out that the maps were an artist’s interpretation, rather
shade-bearing trees such as Beech and limes Tilia than a realistic depiction of the forest vegetation.
were also absent from Ireland; oaks and Hazel So both pictorial and written accounts can be
might thrive in Ireland in the absence of large untrustworthy and social context may be crucial
herbivores, whereas in the presence of shade-toler- to interpretation.
Factors such as fire and disease would have had a significant impact on the nature of the landscape. John Davis
Even if some shadows of the ‘wildwood’ practice, and Remmert (1992) introduced the
survived into historic times on the Continent, in concept of cyclical mosaics to forest ecology.
Britain, wilderness, waste and forest in the medi- Peterken (1996) concluded that in natural wood-
eval sense cannot be equated with the state of the land, openings of various kinds form a permanent
mid-Holocene landscape. Most of Britain had, by and sometimes common component.
this time, been subject to some form of agricultural
use for hundreds, if not thousands of years. Medi- Conclusions and discussion
eval wilderness or waste was strongly influenced Vera’s (2000) work has stimulated an exciting
by human management (grazing, burning, cutting debate. Unfortunately, the argument has often
of wood and bracken, etc) (Rackham 1986, 2003). polarised around the false dichotomies that either
Pollen and archaeological evidence increasingly the landscape was half-open and large herbivores
point to the demise of major uncleared landscapes were important or the landscape was completely
in Britain by the late Iron Age, which renders the closed and herbivores were not important at all.
literary debate somewhat futile. This ignores other possibilities such as that the
landscape was open, but not herbivore-driven, or
Does the established wisdom support a
closed, but with large herbivores playing a signifi-
dominance of closed-canopy forest in central
cant role. The difference between the closed-forest
and western Europe?
hypothesis and the alternative of cyclical dynam-
Although it is not difficult to find references to ics may be a matter of degree. Miller (2002), for
the ‘widely held belief that a climax vegetation of example, asks whether the grassland or the forest
closed forest covered the lowlands in prehistoric provides the matrix in which the other may be
times’ (Box 1), closer inspection of the literature found.
reveals that this view has not necessarily been One of the major problems involved in applying
supported by experts in the field. While predomi- the ideas in conservation is that there is no clear
nant tree-cover may be posited, vegetation dynam- idea of spatial or temporal scale. Vera refers to a
ics and structural variation is clearly recognised. ‘half-open’ landscape but does not give any justifi-
As early as 1945 Jones had suggested that ‘climax cation for this particular level of openness. Kirby’s
forest’ may be a ‘concept only, never existing in (2003, 2004) model, based on Vera’s description
of the phases in his cycle, shows that many differ- and that we can strive towards, but never reach, a
ent combinations of open and closed conditions future natural state.
could potentially occur. There is, however, increasing interest in creating
Degrees of openness are likely to vary in differ- landscapes that are driven more by natural distur-
ent topographic, climatic and soil conditions, but bance processes than by agricultural or forestry
at present there is no guidance on the patterns that practices. Grazing by large herbivores has a role
might be expected. Future research may reveal to play in such attempts, but not to the exclusion
more about the factors that influence temporal and of other factors. In some cases, this may involve
spatial patterns of vegetation in the full range of the descendants, albeit much modified both
environmental conditions. A focus on large herbiv- morphologically and behaviourally, of species
ores as a single factor driving landscape structure that were present in the pre-Neolithic period; in
is also rather limiting. Given the highly variable other cases, a wider range of animals may be used.
topography and geology that exists in Britain, a The outcomes of such efforts are by definition
more realistic approach may be to consider that uncertain and unpredictable (Hodder & Bullock
over much of the landscape there would have been 2005b). None of us will live long enough to see
several disturbance factors (grazing, flood, fire, the outcome of these attempts to create new ‘wild-
disease, wind, human activity), all driving change wood’ or ‘wild-parkland’.
to differing extents, the significance of which could
Acknowledgements
also vary over time. In Britain, deciduous forest
may rarely burn, but one rare lightning strike lead- This work was funded by English Nature. A wide
ing to extensive wildfire may have been sufficient variety of people commented on the various drafts
to modify succession for long periods. of the English Nature report, Large herbivores in
We agree that the openness of the landscape and the wildlwood and modern naturalistic grazing
the role of large herbivores have both been under- systems (EN Report 648), and of this article. We
played in past discussions, but conclude that Vera’s are grateful to them for all their contributions, but
argument – that the bulk of the lowland landscape particularly to Frans Vera for starting us all off.
was half-open and driven by large herbivores – is
not currently supported by the evidence. Multi- References and further reading
Alexander, K N A 2004 Landscapes with ancient trees: invertebrate
disciplinary studies of fossil and sub-fossil assem- mobility and population viability. In: R Smithers (ed) Landscape ecol-
blages supported by studies of fossilisation, which ogy of trees and forests pp 107-114. IALE, UK
Alexander, K N A 2005 Wood decay, insects, palaeoecology, and
help us to interpret this buried evidence, may woodland conservation policy and practice – breaking the halter.
eventually solve this problem. Antennae 29: 171-178
Andel, J V, & Aronson, J 2006 Restoration Ecology: the New Frontier.
Finally, does this debate have relevance for Blackwell Science Ltd, London
modern nature conservation? Is the pre-Neolithic Bakker, E S, Olff, H, Vandeneberghe, C, De Maeyer, K, Smit, R, Gleich-
man, J M, & Vera, F W M 2004 Ecological anachronisms in the
landscape appropriate as a ‘template’ or guidance? recruitment of temperate light-demanding tree species in wooded
The merits and limits of using any past landscapes pastures. Journal of Ecology 41: 571-582
Bell, M G 1983 Valley sediments as evidence of prehistoric land-use on
in conservation planning have deservedly received the South Downs. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 49: 119-
significant attention (e.g. Andel & Aronson 2006, 150
Bell, M, & Walker, M J C 2004 Late Quaternary Environments. Physical
Egan & Howell 2001, Higgs 2003) and certain & Human Perspectives (2nd ed). Harlow, Pearson Prentice Hall
conceptual and practical issues emerge repeatedly. Bokdam, J 2003 Nature conservation and grazing management. Free
ranging cattle as a driving force for cyclic vegetation succession. PhD
How do you select the correct ‘template’ and how thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen
meaningful is this reference to the past in a world Bradshaw, R H W 1981 Modern pollen-representation factors for
woods in south east England. Journal of Ecology 69: 45-70
where biophysical conditions constantly change. Bradshaw, R H W 2002 Forest Ecology and Management [Review of
Nature reserves in Britain are the product of their Grazing Ecology and Forest History]. Forest Ecology and Manage-
ment 165: 327-329
history, particularly the last 13,000 years since the Bradshaw, R H W 2008 Detecting human impact in pollen record using
tabula rasa of the last glaciation. Every accident of data-model comparison. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 17:
597-603
fire, disease or overgrazing has left a subtle mark Bradshaw, R H W, & Hannon, G 2004 The Holocene structure of north-
on subsequent landscapes. It would seem reason- west European forest induced from palaeoecological data. In: O
Honnay and others (eds) Forest Biodiversity: Lessons from History for
able to assume that no one really believes that past Conservation. IUFRO, Leuven
landscapes can be restored exactly, but that inval- Bradshaw, R H W, Hannon, G, & Lister, A 2003 A long-term perspective
on ungulate-vegetation interactions. Forest Ecology and Manage-
uable lessons may be learned by looking back,